throbber
·1· · · · · ·IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·2
`
`·3
`· · · · · · · · ·BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`·4
`
`·5
`
`·6
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·GRUNENTHAL GMBH,
`·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Petitioner
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · v.
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · ·ANTECIP BIOVENTURES II LLC,
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Patent Owner
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13· · · · · · · · · · · · · Case PGR2017-00022
`· · · · · · · · · · · ·U.S. Patent No. 9,408,862 B2
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17· · · · · ·The deposition of STEPHEN BRUEHL, a witness in the
`
`18· · · ·above-entitled cause, taken before Cynthia Odom,
`
`19· · · ·Licensed Court Reporter and Notary Public in and for
`
`20· · · ·Davidson County, Tennessee, at 511 Union Street, Suite
`
`21· · · ·2700, Nashville, Tennessee, on the 9th day of January,
`
`22· · · ·2018, commencing at 9:00 a.m., pursuant to the Rules
`
`23· · · ·governing U.S. Patent and Trademark Procedure.
`
`24
`
`25 Job No. 441881
`
`ANTECIP EXHIBIT 2026
`Grunenthal GmbH v. Antecip Bioventures II LLC
`PGR2017-00022
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`·1· ·APPEARANCES:
`·2· · ·FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`· · · · ·1290 Avenue of the Americas
`·3· · · ·New York, New York 10104-3800
`· · · · ·For Grunenthal GMBH
`·4· · · ·BY:· JAMES R. TYMINSKI, ESQ.
`· · · · ·(212) 218-2520
`·5· · · ·jtyminski@fchs.com
`·6· · ·MASCHOFF BRENNAN
`· · · · ·1389 Center Drive, Suite 300
`·7· · · ·Park City, Utah 84098
`· · · · ·For Antecip Bioventures II, LLC
`·8· · · ·BY:· R. PARRISH FREEMAN, JR., ESQ.
`· · · · ·(435) 575-1419
`·9· · · ·pfreeman@mabr.com
`10· ·ALSO PRESENT:
`11· · · ·Brent A. Johnson, Ph.D., Esq.
`· · · · ·William Solander, Esq.
`12
`13
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·INDEX
`14· ·Witness· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Page
`15· ·Stephen Bruehl
`16· ·Direct Examination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
`17· ·Cross Examination. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
`18
`· · · · · · · · · · CONFIDENTIAL DESIGNATION
`19
`· · ·Page 46, Line 6, through
`20· ·Page 47, Line 9
`21
`22· · · · · · · · · · · · · EXHIBITS
`23· ·No.· Description· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Page
`24· ·No Exhibits Marked.
`25
`
`Page 3
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · S T I P U L A T I O N
`·2· · · ·The deposition of STEPHEN BRUEHL taken by
`·3· ·agreement at 511 Union Street, Suite 2700, Nashville,
`·4· ·Tennessee, beginning at 9:00 A.M., January 9, 2018, on
`·5· ·behalf of the Patent Owner pursuant to the provisions
`·6· ·of the Rules governing U.S. Patent and Trademark
`·7· ·Procedure.
`·8· · · ·Formalities as to notice, caption, certificate,
`·9· ·and filing are waived.
`10· · · ·All objections, except as to the form of the
`11· ·question, are reserved to the hearing.· The reporter,
`12· ·being a notary public, may swear the witness.
`13· · · · · · · · · · ·STEPHEN BRUEHL,
`14· ·having first been duly sworn, testified as follows:
`15· · · · · · · · · ·DIRECT EXAMINATION
`16· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`17· · · Q.· · Dr. Bruehl, you're testifying today as an
`18· ·expert in the area of methods of treating knee pain;
`19· ·is that correct?
`20· · · A.· · That's correct, pain and -- chronic pain and
`21· ·chronic pain treatment.
`22· · · Q.· · And you have training in methods of treating
`23· ·knee pain?
`24· · · A.· · I have training in methods of evaluating and
`25· ·treating chronic pain.
`
`Page 4
`·1· · · Q.· · Do you have education in treating knee pain?
`·2· · · A.· · Yes, I do.
`·3· · · Q.· · Do you have experience in methods of treating
`·4· ·knee pain?
`·5· · · A.· · Not personally but in the research context,
`·6· ·yes.
`·7· · · Q.· · Would you say you have skill in the area of
`·8· ·methods of treating knee pain?
`·9· · · A.· · I have skill in the area of chronic pain,
`10· ·which encompasses knee pain.
`11· · · Q.· · And you have knowledge of methods of treating
`12· ·knee pain?
`13· · · A.· · Yes.
`14· · · Q.· · Do you have any training with regard to oral
`15· ·zoledronic acid?
`16· · · A.· · My training from that comes from reading
`17· ·about bisphosphonates and writing about them in the
`18· ·context of treating other conditions.
`19· · · Q.· · So I'm asking specifically with regard to
`20· ·training; do you have any specialized training?
`21· · · A.· · Like educational training?
`22· · · Q.· · Yes.
`23· · · A.· · No, I do not.
`24· · · Q.· · So my next question is any education in the
`25· ·area of oral zoledronic acid, and I believe you said
`
`Page 5
`
`·1· ·no?
`·2· · · A.· · No, be the same issues.
`·3· · · Q.· · And do you have any experience with oral
`·4· ·zoledronic acid?
`·5· · · A.· · In the research context I've written about it
`·6· ·before, read about it.
`·7· · · Q.· · Would you say you have any specialized skill
`·8· ·with regard to oral zoledronic acid?
`·9· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form.
`10· · · A.· · Skill in what capacity?
`11· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`12· · · Q.· · Skill -- you can define it however you like.
`13· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form.
`14· · · A.· · Yeah, I have some knowledge of that based on
`15· ·reading that I've done, scientific literature.
`16· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`17· · · Q.· · Would you say you have skill in excess of
`18· ·others in the field?
`19· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form.
`20· · · A.· · I would say that I have knowledge of
`21· ·bisphosphonates and zoledronic acid based on reading
`22· ·that would make me comparable to other people in that
`23· ·situation.
`24· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`25· · · Q.· · So your skill is based on your knowledge,
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`·1· ·which is based on reading?
`·2· · · A.· · Correct, and working with other people who
`·3· ·use bisphosphonates.
`·4· · · Q.· · Do you have any specialized training with
`·5· ·regard to nonoral applications of zoledronic acid?
`·6· · · A.· · Such as intravenous?
`·7· · · Q.· · Yes.
`·8· · · A.· · It would be the same issue, just based on
`·9· ·reading literature.
`10· · · Q.· · So no specialized training?
`11· · · A.· · No.
`12· · · Q.· · No education?
`13· · · A.· · No, no specific education on that.
`14· · · Q.· · And your experience is based on what you've
`15· ·read?
`16· · · A.· · What I've read and then talking with other
`17· ·people who do use it clinically.
`18· · · Q.· · And would you say you have any skill with
`19· ·regard to the uses of nonoral zoledronic acid?
`20· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form.
`21· · · A.· · Skills in terms of what?
`22· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`23· · · Q.· · Using it.
`24· · · A.· · No special skills beyond what I've read and
`25· ·discussed with other people who do use it.
`
`Page 7
`
`·1· · · Q.· · And your knowledge of the uses and
`·2· ·applications of nonoral zoledronic acid come from that
`·3· ·same source, your reading and speaking with others who
`·4· ·have used it?
`·5· · · A.· · That's correct.
`·6· · · Q.· · So is it fair to say with regard to both oral
`·7· ·and nonoral zoledronic acid that you don't have any
`·8· ·firsthand experience with using it?
`·9· · · A.· · I don't use it clinically, that's correct.
`10· · · Q.· · You said you don't use it clinically; do you
`11· ·use it non-clinically?
`12· · · A.· · No, not -- no, I don't have pragmatic use of
`13· ·administering the drug.
`14· · · Q.· · Do you have any firsthand experience with any
`15· ·use of the drug?
`16· · · A.· · I'm not sure what other uses would be.
`17· · · Q.· · Well, you said pragmatic, so I'm just --
`18· · · A.· · Oh, pragmatic meaning like actually hands-on
`19· ·administering to patients using for clinical purposes,
`20· ·I don't do that.
`21· · · Q.· · You don't have any personal experience with
`22· ·the use of zoledronic acid in --
`23· · · A.· · No.
`24· · · Q.· · -- either form, oral or nonoral?
`25· · · A.· · That's correct.
`
`Page 8
`·1· · · Q.· · How about with regard to bioavailability, do
`·2· ·you know what I mean when I say that?
`·3· · · A.· · Yes, I do.
`·4· · · Q.· · Can you tell me what you think I mean?
`·5· · · A.· · That means that the amount of the drug that
`·6· ·is ingested in whatever route, it's the percentage of
`·7· ·the drug that actually gets processed in the body and
`·8· ·can have an active effect.
`·9· · · Q.· · And that which is not processed stays in the
`10· ·GI tract; right?
`11· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form, outside
`12· ·the scope.
`13· · · A.· · Are you referring to IV or oral?
`14· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`15· · · Q.· · Well, there's no real bioavailability issue
`16· ·with IV, is there, it's 100 percent absorbed, is it
`17· ·not?
`18· · · A.· · That is correct.
`19· · · Q.· · So I'm referring to non-IV uses.
`20· · · A.· · Okay.
`21· · · Q.· · And I guess specifically oral.
`22· · · A.· · Okay.· So oral stays in the GI tract?· No,
`23· ·it's -- all of it ends up getting excreted or absorbed
`24· ·into the bone.
`25· · · Q.· · Well, I'm trying to distinguish between --
`
`Page 9
`·1· ·you know, in terms of a bioavailability percentage, do
`·2· ·you have an understanding of what that percentage
`·3· ·would be based on?
`·4· · · A.· · Yes, it would be like doing a study of the
`·5· ·pharmacokinetics where they would administer a certain
`·6· ·amount of drug and then follow how much is excreted
`·7· ·over time.
`·8· · · Q.· · But it's the amount that goes into the system
`·9· ·versus the amount that stays in the GI tract; is it
`10· ·not?
`11· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form, and
`12· ·outside the scope of the direct.
`13· · · A.· · I guess on a very brief time scale that would
`14· ·be correct because it would end up getting excreted
`15· ·from the GI tract.
`16· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`17· · · Q.· · Do you have any specialized training with
`18· ·regard to bioavailability?
`19· · · A.· · No, I do not.
`20· · · Q.· · So you have no specialized education with
`21· ·regard to bioavailability?
`22· · · A.· · No, I'm not, and in this case I'm relying on
`23· ·Dr. Wilson for that expertise.
`24· · · Q.· · So no experience with bioavailability?
`25· · · A.· · In the context of reading articles that have
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`·1· ·discussed that.
`·2· · · Q.· · Any other context?
`·3· · · A.· · No.
`·4· · · Q.· · Any specialized skill with regard to
`·5· ·bioavailability?
`·6· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form.
`·7· · · A.· · No.
`·8· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`·9· · · Q.· · Any specialized knowledge with regard to
`10· ·bioavailability?
`11· · · A.· · No.
`12· · · Q.· · Can you tell me what you did today in
`13· ·preparation for this deposition?· I'm sorry, let me
`14· ·back up.
`15· · · · · · · · · MR. FREEMAN:· Scratch that question.
`16· · · Q.· · Did you do anything in preparation for your
`17· ·testimony today?
`18· · · A.· · Yes, I did.
`19· · · Q.· · What did you do?
`20· · · A.· · I read my declaration; Dr. Wilson's
`21· ·declaration; the patent office response to the initial
`22· ·filing; I read the response filed by your client and
`23· ·their expert, Dr. Papopolous, I believe, in response
`24· ·to the patent office response; I looked at the
`25· ·articles that were in my reference list in my
`
`Page 12
`·1· · · Q.· · Did they hand you anything that looked to be
`·2· ·like notes or work product?
`·3· · · A.· · No.
`·4· · · Q.· · No summaries or charts or anything like that?
`·5· · · A.· · Just charts that are embedded in the context
`·6· ·of those things that were filed as exhibits.
`·7· · · Q.· · Did you meet with your lawyers?
`·8· · · A.· · Yes.
`·9· · · Q.· · How much time did you spend with them?
`10· · · A.· · Haven't tallied it up, about 12 hours total.
`11· · · Q.· · Yesterday?
`12· · · A.· · Sunday and Monday.
`13· · · Q.· · So that's yesterday and the day before
`14· ·yesterday?
`15· · · A.· · Yes, correct.
`16· · · Q.· · I'm going to hand you what has already been
`17· ·marked in the case as Exhibit 1003, which is a copy of
`18· ·your declaration.· Do you want a clip?
`19· · · A.· · Yeah, please.
`20· · · Q.· · Do you have Exhibit 1003 in front of you?
`21· · · A.· · Yes, I do.
`22· · · Q.· · So paragraph 1, if you'll follow me, you make
`23· ·reference to the references cited in this declaration;
`24· ·do you see that?
`25· · · A.· · Yes.
`
`Page 11
`·1· ·declaration and saw at least one article from the
`·2· ·filing that you had -- that your client had included
`·3· ·in their response.
`·4· · · Q.· · What do you mean when you say that?
`·5· · · A.· · There was a Conte reference that I did not
`·6· ·reference in my declaration that was cited in your
`·7· ·client's response.
`·8· · · Q.· · The response in this case?
`·9· · · A.· · Yes, the response to the patent office, there
`10· ·was a citation for a Conte article.
`11· · · Q.· · Is that an exhibit in this case?
`12· · · A.· · I would -- I'm assuming so, it was cited in
`13· ·one of the responses I read.
`14· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· I can represent it's an
`15· ·exhibit in this case, it's the Conte article that's
`16· ·referenced in Dr. Papopolous' declaration.
`17· · · A.· · And I also looked over the patents, the 862
`18· ·patent, the Leonard, the Fox, the Marian poster.
`19· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`20· · · Q.· · Your lawyers provided you with these
`21· ·documents?
`22· · · A.· · Yes.
`23· · · Q.· · To your knowledge is everything that they
`24· ·provided you of record in this case?
`25· · · A.· · To my knowledge, yes.
`
`Page 13
`·1· · · Q.· · Grunenthal's counsel provided those to you;
`·2· ·is that correct?
`·3· · · A.· · No, not in all cases.
`·4· · · Q.· · You found some yourself?
`·5· · · A.· · I did, I found many of them myself.
`·6· · · Q.· · Which ones did you find yourself?
`·7· · · A.· · Let's see, and this is just by recollection
`·8· ·so I'm not 100 percent sure this is accurate.
`·9· · · Q.· · Okay.
`10· · · A.· · I believe 1017 -- do you want me to go by
`11· ·number?
`12· · · Q.· · Yes, please.
`13· · · A.· · 1017, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1023,
`14· ·1024, 1025, 1029, 1030, 1045, 1046, 1047, 1048, 1049,
`15· ·1050, 1051, 1053, 1055, 1056, 1057.· I guess that's it
`16· ·on my sheet; are there others?· I just want to make
`17· ·sure I'm not missing a page.
`18· · · Q.· · No, I don't think there are others relevant
`19· ·to your declaration.
`20· · · A.· · Okay.· All right.
`21· · · Q.· · So is it fair to say that the other exhibits
`22· ·that you referred to -- the other references that you
`23· ·referred to in your declaration that you did not just
`24· ·list for me as having been found by you were provided
`25· ·to you by your counsel?
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`·1· · · A.· · Yes, that's correct.
`·2· · · Q.· · And --
`·3· · · A.· · I'm sorry, did I say 1008?
`·4· · · Q.· · You did not.
`·5· · · A.· · Okay.· 1008 was one I found also.
`·6· · · Q.· · And to be clear, when I say your counsel I'm
`·7· ·referring to Grunenthal's legal counsel; is that your
`·8· ·understanding as well?
`·9· · · A.· · That is how I interpret that, yeah.
`10· · · Q.· · Have you been deposed before?
`11· · · A.· · Yes.
`12· · · Q.· · Just one quick reminder, we have to be
`13· ·careful not to speak over each other.
`14· · · A.· · I understand, and I'll do my best not to.
`15· · · Q.· · Fair enough.· So you mentioned that you've
`16· ·done some reading on the area of zoledronic acid; is
`17· ·that correct?
`18· · · A.· · That's correct.
`19· · · Q.· · And oral zoledronic acid?
`20· · · A.· · That's correct.
`21· · · Q.· · Would you say you stay informed of efforts to
`22· ·make oral zoledronic acid?
`23· · · A.· · I think that might go a little far, but I
`24· ·have read quite a bit of material that is relevant to
`25· ·that over the past several years.
`
`Page 16
`
`·1· ·May rather of 2014; is that correct?
`·2· · · A.· · What paragraph is that?· I just to want make
`·3· ·sure the date is correct.
`·4· · · Q.· · Paragraph 18.
`·5· · · A.· · 18.
`·6· · · Q.· · Well, that's what has the date.
`·7· · · A.· · That's the filing date?
`·8· · · Q.· · Yeah.
`·9· · · A.· · Yes, paragraph 30.
`10· · · Q.· · Yes, paragraph 30.
`11· · · A.· · Yes, so that's -- yes, I was.
`12· · · Q.· · You didn't envision using oral zoledronic
`13· ·acid to treat knee pain at that time, did you?
`14· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form.
`15· · · A.· · As of what time?
`16· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`17· · · Q.· · May of 2014.
`18· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Same objection.
`19· · · A.· · I'm having a little trouble, I just want to
`20· ·make sure of the date because I was involved with Thar
`21· ·Pharmaceuticals starting at some point around then, I
`22· ·don't know the exact date, and just to be specific,
`23· ·that they were in the process of trying to develop an
`24· ·oral zoledronic acid.· I'm not sure if it was prior to
`25· ·May 27, 2014.
`
`Page 15
`·1· · · Q.· · So have you seen in the literature a trend
`·2· ·toward -- not a trend but an emphasis on obtaining
`·3· ·higher bioavailability?
`·4· · · A.· · Yes, I know that's an issue with the oral
`·5· ·bisphosphonates.
`·6· · · Q.· · Above 2.5 percent?
`·7· · · A.· · Just higher is better basically is my
`·8· ·understanding.
`·9· · · Q.· · Are you aware that Novartis tried to
`10· ·commercialize a high bioavailability oral zoledronic
`11· ·acid and failed?
`12· · · A.· · I believe I have heard that before.
`13· · · Q.· · Are you aware of others that also tried and
`14· ·failed?
`15· · · A.· · With oral bisphosphonates?
`16· · · Q.· · Oral zoledronic acid.
`17· · · A.· · Oral, no, I'm not aware of any others that
`18· ·have failed.
`19· · · Q.· · Are you aware of anyone else that's trying
`20· ·right now?
`21· · · A.· · I think it's -- the two parties in this case
`22· ·are the two that I'm aware of specifically with
`23· ·zoledronic acid.
`24· · · Q.· · So you said you were a person of skill in the
`25· ·art at the time of the invention, that's March -- or
`
`Page 17
`
`·1· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`·2· · · Q.· · And they were trying to achieve a higher
`·3· ·bioavailability; is that right?
`·4· · · A.· · That's correct.
`·5· · · Q.· · Is there any reason why they would ever try
`·6· ·to achieve or anyone would try to achieve a lower
`·7· ·bioavailability?
`·8· · · A.· · My understanding --
`·9· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form, and
`10· ·outside the scope of the direct.
`11· · · A.· · My understanding is that that is not the
`12· ·desire in terms of bioavailability, that the difficult
`13· ·thing to achieve is to increase bioavailability, and I
`14· ·would assume that there are ways to reduce it that
`15· ·would probably be much easier than increasing
`16· ·bioavailability, but I think Dr. Wilson could answer
`17· ·that better.
`18· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`19· · · Q.· · So no one of skill in the art would be
`20· ·motivated to push the bioavailability range lower?
`21· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form and
`22· ·object as outside the scope of the direct.
`23· · · A.· · Not that I would think, that does not seem
`24· ·obvious to me, although it certainly is possible to do
`25· ·that.
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`·1· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`·2· · · Q.· · Let's look at paragraph 5, please.· Your
`·3· ·background is a bachelor of sciences in psychology
`·4· ·from Belmont; is that correct?
`·5· · · A.· · Correct.
`·6· · · Q.· · And that's here in Nashville?
`·7· · · A.· · That's correct.
`·8· · · Q.· · And then you received a master's in clinical
`·9· ·psychology from Kentucky; is that correct?
`10· · · A.· · That's correct.
`11· · · Q.· · And then you have there that you have a Ph.D.
`12· ·in clinical psychology with a specialization in health
`13· ·psychology?
`14· · · A.· · That is correct.
`15· · · Q.· · And then you say that the Ph.D. is a research
`16· ·degree specifically training the individual to design
`17· ·and conduct research studies and to read and interpret
`18· ·the published literature.
`19· · · A.· · That is entirely correct.
`20· · · Q.· · So there's two different components of that;
`21· ·right?
`22· · · A.· · Okay.
`23· · · Q.· · I'm asking you, do you agree with me so far,
`24· ·two different components, at least as --
`25· · · A.· · You mean to design and conduct?
`
`Page 20
`·1· ·happens after training, because starting in about 19
`·2· ·--
`·3· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`·4· · · Q.· · But I am just focused on the training right
`·5· ·now.
`·6· · · A.· · Okay.· Well, restate the question, please.
`·7· · · Q.· · Your Ph.D., your degree, doctor of
`·8· ·philosophy, is in the psychology of treating pain; is
`·9· ·that correct?
`10· · · A.· · That would be a main focus of it, yes.
`11· · · Q.· · Not so much the use of medication or
`12· ·prescribing it, using medication to treat the pain?
`13· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Objection to form.
`14· · · A.· · In terms of training that's partially true
`15· ·because in graduate school part of my training was
`16· ·being involved in research that was being conducted,
`17· ·and that research did involve administration of drugs.
`18· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`19· · · Q.· · You're not a medical doctor, are you?
`20· · · A.· · No, I'm not.
`21· · · Q.· · And you can't prescribe medication, you
`22· ·cannot prescribe medication; is that correct?
`23· · · A.· · That is correct.
`24· · · Q.· · You don't treat patients, do you?
`25· · · A.· · I used to treat patients in the context of a
`
`Page 19
`·1· · · Q.· · Okay.· Good point.· What I meant there is you
`·2· ·have designing and conducting research studies and
`·3· ·then read and interpret published literature.
`·4· · · A.· · Those would be two different things.
`·5· · · Q.· · And was that the focus of the Ph.D., those
`·6· ·two goals?
`·7· · · A.· · Yes, that is a big part of the Ph.D., and it
`·8· ·distinguishes it from a Psy.D degree, which is just a
`·9· ·clinical degree that teaches people to see patients.
`10· ·And I would just mention in context, because people
`11· ·outside the area wouldn't necessarily know this, but
`12· ·in the context of medical research it's very common
`13· ·for Ph.D.s, frequently psychologists, to be the ones
`14· ·that are helping direct the research efforts because
`15· ·of those kinds of skills that you develop.
`16· · · Q.· · Well, your Ph.D. is in psychology; is that
`17· ·right?
`18· · · A.· · Yes.
`19· · · Q.· · So is your Ph.D. in the psychology -- I mean
`20· ·to the extent it relates to methods of treating pain
`21· ·is it limited to the psychology of methods of treating
`22· ·pain?
`23· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form.
`24· · · A.· · I would point out two things, one is that the
`25· ·-- and you have to distinguish training from what
`
`Page 21
`·1· ·multidisciplinary team, chronic pain patients. I
`·2· ·didn't prescribe for those patients, however.
`·3· · · Q.· · You didn't prescribe medication to those
`·4· ·patients?
`·5· · · A.· · Yes, that's correct.
`·6· · · Q.· · Would you agree with me that the claims in
`·7· ·this case, claims 2 through 16, involve prescribing
`·8· ·medication?
`·9· · · A.· · They involve medication.
`10· · · Q.· · The medications --
`11· · · A.· · I mean the bioavailability is -- regards to
`12· ·prescribing it, but it involves the treatment of knee
`13· ·pain using oral zoledronic acid.
`14· · · Q.· · To your knowledge is there any
`15· ·over-the-counter oral zoledronic acid available?
`16· · · A.· · No.
`17· · · Q.· · So it would necessarily involve prescribing
`18· ·oral zoledronic acid, would it not?
`19· · · A.· · Yes, or working with somebody who does.
`20· · · Q.· · When you say you treat patients, or you used
`21· ·to treat patients in the context of clinical trials,
`22· ·is that what you said?
`23· · · A.· · I said multidisciplinary care, so it is a
`24· ·team involving a physician, psychologist, frequently
`25· ·physical therapist, occupational therapist.
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Page 22
`·1· · · Q.· · What would your role be in that context?
`·2· · · A.· · My direct clinical role would be treating the
`·3· ·patients using the psychological perspective, like
`·4· ·skills that they could learn mentally to manage pain
`·5· ·more effectively, but it would frequently involve very
`·6· ·close collaboration with the physicians, and in the
`·7· ·context of team meetings there would be issues
`·8· ·discussed, like medications that were being used and
`·9· ·options for that, and they would sometimes involve me
`10· ·in those discussions, particularly when it involved
`11· ·things like antidepressants and other options like
`12· ·that.
`13· · · Q.· · But the psychology of using the
`14· ·antidepressants; is that right?
`15· · · A.· · For that particular type drug it would be the
`16· ·impact it would have on their psychological state.
`17· · · Q.· · When you say impact do you mean the medical
`18· ·effect or the psychological impact of the patient
`19· ·perceiving themselves now as someone who takes
`20· ·medication to manage an issue?
`21· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form.
`22· · · A.· · The issue you just stated there did sometimes
`23· ·come up, but it was primarily dealing with the medical
`24· ·effect of the drug on the symptoms that were
`25· ·psychological in nature, such as depression, which is
`
`Page 24
`
`·1· · · Q.· · Were you trained with regard to
`·2· ·bisphosphonates generally?
`·3· · · A.· · No, I was not, not in my education.
`·4· · · Q.· · You've gained some understanding regarding
`·5· ·bisphosphonates since obtaining your Ph.D.; is that
`·6· ·correct?
`·7· · · A.· · That's correct.
`·8· · · Q.· · If a person of skill in the art reads
`·9· ·something pertaining to intravenous bisphosphonate
`10· ·that wouldn't really teach that person anything about
`11· ·oral bisphosphonates, would it?
`12· · · · · · · · · MR. TYMINSKI:· Object to form.
`13· · · A.· · No, not necessarily, and you have to factor
`14· ·in the bioavailability issues.
`15· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`16· · · Q.· · Looking at paragraph 6, you were a professor
`17· ·of anesthesiology at Vanderbilt; is that correct?
`18· · · A.· · That's correct.· Technically it's Vanderbilt
`19· ·University Medical Center.
`20· · · Q.· · Do you teach currently about using oral
`21· ·zoledronic acid?
`22· · · A.· · Yeah, and some of the educational talks that
`23· ·I give will talk about bisphosphonates in general, I'm
`24· ·not sure necessarily zoledronic acid for treatment of
`25· ·complex regional pain syndrome.
`
`Page 23
`·1· ·very common, or anxiety symptoms, but you're correct,
`·2· ·I was not the one prescribing the medication.
`·3· ·BY MR. FREEMAN:
`·4· · · Q.· · And you don't currently treat patients?
`·5· · · A.· · No, I'm 100 percent research funded.
`·6· · · Q.· · When was the last time you were involved in
`·7· ·an interdiscipline -- what did you call it,
`·8· ·multidisciplinary?
`·9· · · A.· · You can call it either, interdisciplinary or
`10· ·multidisciplinary, and that would be 2003, it's been a
`11· ·while.
`12· · · Q.· · So you weren't treating patients in any
`13· ·capacity in May of 2014?
`14· · · A.· · No, the only patient contact I would have
`15· ·would be in the context of research studies where we
`16· ·do deal with chronic pain patients.
`17· · · Q.· · So in your training for your Ph.D. you were
`18· ·trained to design clinical trials; is that correct?
`19· · · A.· · That was part of it, yes.
`20· · · Q.· · Were you trained to design any involving oral
`21· ·zoledronic acid?
`22· · · A.· · No, not specifically.
`23· · · Q.· · Were you trained to design any involving
`24· ·nonoral zoledronic acid?
`25· · · A.· · No, not specifically.
`
`Page 25
`·1· · · Q.· · So just to be clear, you're teaching students
`·2· ·-- you don't know whether you are teaching them with
`·3· ·regard to zoledronic acid specifically?
`·4· · · A.· · Well, the reason I used that particular
`·5· ·language was I'm talking about teaching that is not
`·6· ·just like predoctoral students, I'm talking about
`·7· ·teaching residents, people who are already faculty or
`·8· ·practitioners in the community, because I do
`·9· ·continuing medical education talks sometimes, and I
`10· ·know that in the past I have talked about use of
`11· ·bisphosphonates for treatment of complex regional pain
`12· ·syndrome because that is a particular type of
`13· ·treatment that seems to work in that population, and I
`14· ·think at some point I have probably mentioned that
`15· ·there are these other forms in development that I just
`16· ·cannot recall whether I've used zoledronic acid as a
`17· ·specific example of ongoing studies.
`18· · · Q.· · So you're a Ph.D. in clinical psychology, and
`19· ·now you're a professor of anesthesiology, to me that's
`20· ·a big change, but I'm not a doctor or anything like
`21· ·that, so can you help me understand how -- your
`22· ·application of your Ph.D. training in being a
`23· ·professor of anesthesiology?
`24· · · A.· · Yes, yes, and I agree it looks weird to
`25· ·somebody who doesn't know the reasons why.· So chronic
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`·1· ·pain clinics are most frequently staffed by
`·2· ·anesthesiologists because many of the techniques that
`·3· ·are used beyond pharmacological treatments are various
`·4· ·forms of blocks, like sympathetic nerve blocks or
`·5· ·sematic nerve blocks that anesthesiologists have a
`·6· ·great deal of training in because of what they do in
`·7· ·the operating room, and because the chronic pain
`·8· ·treatment centers are often affiliated with the
`·9· ·anesthesiology departments what that means is other
`10· ·people that work in the area of chronic pain often are
`11· ·housed in anesthesiology departments, so in my
`12· ·particular case it goes back to the issue of the
`13· ·Ph.D., being training and doing research, conducting
`14· ·research and reading research, so my role in our
`15· ·department is to take those skills and develop
`16· ·research projects that can get funding ideally, like
`17· ·from National Institutes of Health, and carry out
`18· ·those research studies using those skills, and while
`19· ·in some cases the studies may be psychological in
`20· ·nature those broad clinical -- broad training and
`21· ·research skills can be applied to medical areas as
`22· ·well, and over time what happens is while I may have
`23· ·started out as a psychologist purely over time the
`24· ·work that I've done has expanded through
`25· ·collaborations and expertise that I've just gained
`
`Page 28
`
`·1· ·capacity; is that right?
`·2· · · A.· · Yes, as a person who is not legally capable
`·3· ·of prescribing then we always have co-investigators
`·4· ·who are physicians who do the actual prescribing, so
`·5· ·in our morphine study we have a couple of faculty in
`·6· ·our department that are the ones who are the physician
`·7· ·of record doing the prescribing.
`·8· · · Q.· · Describe that morphine study for me in just a
`·9· ·little bit more detail.
`10· · · A.· · Well, the one that -- this is one -- there
`11· ·were actually two in the series, but the one that is
`12· ·probably most relevant here was answering a question
`13· ·which the National Institute on Drug Abuse asked me
`14· ·about, they said what do we know about how endogenous
`15· ·opioids, what you would call endorphins, how those
`16· ·relate to how people respond to pain medications
`17· ·because they were concerned with the overuse of
`18· ·analgesic medications in chronic pain patients, and
`19· ·their idea that kind of fits in the broader scope of
`20· ·personalized medicine is that maybe these drugs aren't
`21· ·for everyone and that maybe you want to limit them and
`22· ·target them at people that are going to get a better
`23· ·cost benefit with it, they get better pain relief and
`24· ·lower risks, or lower side effects, so that was what
`25· ·the task was that was given to us to do that, so the
`
`Page 27
`·1· ·along the way and to doing studies that have to do
`·2· ·with something very different than psychology, like
`·3· ·dealing with drug responses, and for example right now
`·4· ·one of my grants that is housed through the
`·5· ·anesthesiology department is a grant from the National
`·6· ·Institute on Drug Abuse, looking at predictors of
`·7· ·responses to analgesic drugs, like morphine, in
`·8· ·chronic pain patients.
`·9· · · Q.· · Are you using your psychology background in
`10· ·that capacity?
`11· · · A.· · I'm using my skills that ultimately went back
`12· ·to my Ph.D. in developing good research studies, so I
`13· ·mean that's -- it's like -- the skills that you
`14· ·develop to do a high quality research study in a
`15· ·psychological trial are virtually identical to the
`16· ·skills you would use in developing a drug trial, it's
`17· ·the same issues involved in experimental controls and,
`18· ·you know, confounds to interpretation and those kinds
`19· ·of things, and over time through collaborations I've
`20· ·developed expertise in nonpsychological studies as
`21· ·well, although I started to mention earlier even in
`22· ·graduate school I was doing studies that had an M.D.
`23· ·to do the prescribing, but studies using drugs to
`24· ·probe certain aspects of the stress response.
`25· · · Q.· · But you were working with others in that
`
`Page 29
`·1· ·study we did had chronic back pain patients and also a
`·2· ·group of healthy people come in, and they would do
`·3· ·three sessions in the laboratory, one session they got
`·4· ·saline placebo intravenously, another session they got
`·5· ·a drug called Naloxone, which is an opiate receptor
`·6· ·antagonist, and then the third session they got a
`·7· ·weight adjusted dose of morphine, and in each of those
`·8· ·they would undergo a series of pain stimulus
`·9· ·procedures and then they would say -- basically it's
`10· ·like a computer controlled heat stimulus for a g

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket