throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 13
`
` Entered: May 11, 2018
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`PRIME WIRE & CABLE, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TELEBRANDS CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case PGR2018-00010
`Patent 9,752,761
`_______________
`
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, and
`MONICA S. ULLAGADDI, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ULLAGADDI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Termination of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2018-00010
`Patent 9,752,761
`
`
`I. BACKGROUND
`
`Prime Wire and Cable, Inc. (“Petitioner”) and Telebrands Corp. (“Patent
`Owner”) filed a Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74. Paper 8. The parties also filed a Joint Motion to File
`Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information and to Keep Separate.
`Paper 9. Petitioner and Patent Owner indicate that, pursuant to the Agreement,
`they have settled their dispute regarding U.S. Patent No. 9,752,761. Paper 8, 1.
`The parties identified the Agreement as business confidential information and
`requested that the Agreement be kept separate from the patent file under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 327(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b)-(c). Paper 9, 1. The Board generally expects
`that a case “will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement, unless the
`Board has already decided the merits.” Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012); see 37 C.F.R. § 42.74. Here, the Board has
`not issued a Decision on Institution. Under these circumstances, we determine that
`it is appropriate to terminate this proceeding. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.74. We also
`determine that it is appropriate to treat the Agreement (Ex. 1055) as business
`confidential information to be kept separate from the patent file. See 35 U.S.C. §
`327(b).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`PGR2018-00010
`Patent 9,752,761
`
`
`II. ORDER
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that this proceeding is terminated as to all parties;
`
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the request to treat the Agreement (Ex. 1055) as
`business confidential information, kept separate from the patent file of U.S. Patent
`No. 9,752,761 and made available only to Federal Government agencies on written
`request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, under 35 U.S.C. § 327(b)
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted.
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`John K. Buche
`Bryce A. Johnson
`BUCHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
`jbuche@buchelaw.com
`bjohnson@buchelaw.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert T. Maldonado
`Tonia A. Sayour
`Elana B. Araj
`Benjamin Y. Han
`COOPER & DUNHAM LLP
`rmaldonado@cooperdunham.com
`tsayour@cooperdunham.com
`earaj@cooperdunham.com
`bhan@cooperdunham.com
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket