throbber
Paper 9
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Date Entered: March 29, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`AQ TEXTILES, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ARUN AGARWAL,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases
`PGR2017-00041 (Patent 9,481,950 B2)
`PGR2017-00042 (Patent 9,493,892 B1)
`PGR2018-00018 (Patent 9,708,737 B2)
`____________
`
`Before BART A. GERSTENBLITH, CARL M. DEFRANCO, and
`KEVIN W. CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`CHERRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Termination of Trial, Dismissing the Petition, and Settlement
`35 U.S.C. § 327; 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.71(a), 42.72, 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2017-00041 (Patent 9,481,950 B2)
`PGR2017-00042 (Patent 9,493,892 B1)
`PGR2018-00018 (Patent 9,708,737 B2)
`
`By an email dated March 22, 2018, we authorized Patent Owner Arun
`Agarwal and Petitioner AQ Textiles, LLC (collectively, “the Parties”) to file
`joint motions to terminate these proceedings accompanied by true copies of
`all their agreements in contemplation of termination and a joint request to
`treat the filed copies of those agreements as business confidential
`information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`On March 23, 2018, the Parties filed a Joint Motion to Terminate
`Proceedings Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327 and to Seal Pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(c) (Paper 141), copies of a written Settlement Agreement
`(Exhibit 2003), a Strategic Alliance Agreement (Exhibit 2004), and a
`License Agreement (Exhibit 2005).
`The Parties indicate that they have settled their underlying dispute and
`have agreed to terminate these proceedings pursuant to the Settlement
`Agreement, Strategic Alliance Agreement, and License Agreement, true and
`correct copies of which were filed with the Parties’ Motion. Paper 14, 2.
`The Parties further indicate that there are no other proceedings concerning
`the subject patent. See Pet. 83; Paper 15, 1.
`Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the
`filing of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice
`Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012). Although trial has
`been instituted in PGR2017-00041 and PGR2017-00042, we have not
`decided the merits of either proceeding. See 35 U.S.C. § 327(a) (“A post-
`
`
`1 Similar motions and exhibits were filed in all three proceedings. For
`simplicity, we cite only the papers filed in PGR2017-00042, unless
`otherwise noted.
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`PGR2017-00041 (Patent 9,481,950 B2)
`PGR2017-00042 (Patent 9,493,892 B1)
`PGR2018-00018 (Patent 9,708,737 B2)
`
`grant review instituted under this chapter shall be terminated with respect to
`any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and the patent owner,
`unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request
`for termination is filed.”); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72 (“The Board may terminate a
`trial without rendering a final written decision, where appropriate . . . .”).
`We are persuaded that, under these circumstances, termination of these
`proceedings is appropriate. This paper does not constitute a final written
`decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 328(a).
`As for PGR2018-00018, Patent Owner has yet to file a Preliminary
`Response and we have yet to institute trial. Thus, the proceeding is still in a
`preliminary stage. The parties indicate that they have “settled their dispute.”
`PGR2018-00018, Paper 6, 2. Accordingly, we determine that dismissal of
`the Petition in PGR2018-00018 is appropriate. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a).
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Motion to Terminate Proceedings
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327 and to Seal Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`(PGR2017-00041, Paper 15; PGR2017-00042, Paper 14; PGR2018-00018,
`Paper 6) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement (Exhibit 2003
`in PGR2017-00041 and PGR2017-00042; Exhibit 2001 in PGR2018-
`00018), Strategic Alliance Agreement (Exhibit 2004 in PGR2017-00041 and
`PGR2017-00042; Exhibit 2002 in PGR2018-00018), and License
`Agreement (Exhibit 2005 in PGR2017-00041 and PGR2017-00042;
`Exhibit 2003 in PGR2018-00018) shall be kept separate from the file of the
`
`3
`
`
`

`

`PGR2017-00041 (Patent 9,481,950 B2)
`PGR2017-00042 (Patent 9,493,892 B1)
`PGR2018-00018 (Patent 9,708,737 B2)
`
`above-referenced respective patent, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327(b) and 37
`C.F.R. § 42.74(c);
`FURTHER ORDERED that that the trials in PGR2017-00041 and
`PGR2017-00042 are terminated; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition in PGR2018-00018 is
`dismissed.
`
`4
`
`
`

`

`PGR2017-00041 (Patent 9,481,950 B2)
`PGR2017-00042 (Patent 9,493,892 B1)
`PGR2018-00018 (Patent 9,708,737 B2)
`
`
`For Petitioner:
`Jason L. Lester
`Jason T. Condrasky
`MACCORD MASON PLLC
`jlester@maccordmason.com
`jcondrasky@maccordmason.com
`
`For Patent Owner:
`Michelle W. Skinner
`EDWARDS MAXSON MAGO & MACAULAY, LLP
`mskinner@em3law.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket