`Patent No. 9,636,583
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`Supercell Oy,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`
`GREE, Inc.,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`PGR2018-00029
`Patent 9,636,583
`_____________
`
`PETITIONER SUPERCELL OY’S REQUEST FOR
`ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`30646/96002/FW/10689975.1
`
`
`
`PGR2018-00029
`Patent No. 9,636,583
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F. R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s August 20, 2018 Scheduling
`
`Order (Paper 22), Petitioner Supercell Oy hereby requests oral argument on the issues
`
`set forth below at a time set by the Board. Pursuant to the Board’s March 29, 2019
`
`Order, Patent Owner understands that oral argument is currently scheduled for
`
`June 21, 2019. Petitioner proposes that argument in this case be consolidated with
`
`the hearing in PGR2018-00047, which is also scheduled for June 21, 2019, and
`
`involves a related patent, Patent No. 9,770,659. The patent at issue in this
`
`proceeding is the parent of Patent No. 9,770,659 and includes overlapping subject
`
`matter.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner respectfully requests up to
`
`ninety (90) minutes of oral argument for both Petitioner and Patent Owner for the
`
`consolidated hearings (PGR2018-00029 and PGR2018-00047) on all issues raised
`
`in the papers in each case, including the Petition, Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`
`Response, Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response, Patent
`
`Owner’s Sur-Reply, the Board’s Institution Decision, Patent Owner’s Request for
`
`Reconsideration, Decision on Request for Rehearing, Patent Owner’s Response,
`
`Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response, and Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply.
`
`
`
`1
`
`30646/96002/FW/10689975.1
`
`
`
`PGR2018-00029
`Patent No. 9,636,583
`
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board provide audio/visual equipment
`
`to display demonstrative exhibits and evidence of record, including the use of a
`
`projector and screen for displaying documents.
`
`Petitioner requests oral argument on all issues raised in the parties’ filings,
`
`including but not limited to the following:
`
`1.
`
`Whether claims 1-15 of U.S. Patent No. 9,636,583 are unpatentable
`
`based on the grounds on which the Board instituted trial.
`
`Any issues specified by Patent Owner in a request for oral argument.
`
`Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 22, 2019
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/Jennifer R. Bush/
`
`JENNIFER R. BUSH
`Reg. No. 50,784
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`30646/96002/FW/10689975.1
`
`
`
`PGR2018-00029
`Patent No. 9,636,583
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, the undersigned certifies that on April 22, 2019, I
`
`caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing PETITIONER SUPERCELL OY’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) to be electronically
`
`served on Patent Owner’s lead and backup counsel at the following addresses:
`
`John C. Alemanni
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`42088 Six Forks Road, Suite 1400
`Raleigh, NC 27609
`
`jalemanni@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Scott E. Kolassa
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1080 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`skolassa@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Dated: April 22, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`Andrew Rinehart
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1001 West Fourth Street
`Winston-Salem, NC 2710-2400
`
`arinehart@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Steven D. Moore
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1900
`San Francisco, CA 9411
`
`smoore@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`
`
`/Jennifer R. Bush/
`JENNIFER R. BUSH
`Reg. No. 50,784
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`30646/96002/FW/10689975.1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
