throbber
5/10/2018
`
`Guidance on the impact of SAS on AIA trial proceedings | USPTO
`
`Guidance on the impact of SAS on AIA
`trial proceedings
`Release date: April 26, 2018

`On April 24, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 2018 WL 1914661, (U.S. Apr. 24, 2018). In light
`of this decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) will proceed in the following fashion at this time. The PTAB will
`continue to assess the impact of this decision on its operations and will provide further guidance in the future if
`appropriate.
`
`As required by the decision, the PTAB will institute as to all claims or none. At this time, if the PTAB institutes a trial, the
`PTAB will institute on all challenges raised in the petition. 
`
`For pending trials in which a panel has instituted trial on all of the challenges raised in the petition, the panel will continue
`with the proceeding in the normal course. By contrast, for pending trials in which a panel has instituted trial only on some
`of the challenges raised in the petition (as opposed to all challenges raised in the petition), the panel may issue an order
`supplementing the institution decision to institute on all challenges raised in the petition. 
`
`Additionally, for pending trials in which a panel enters an order supplementing the institution decision pursuant to this
`notice, the panel may take further action to manage the trial proceeding, including, for example, permitting additional
`time, briefing, discovery, and/or oral argument, depending on various circumstances and the stage of the proceeding. For
`example, if the panel has instituted a trial and the case is near the end of the time allotted for filing the Patent Owner
`Response, the panel may extend the due date for the Patent Owner Response to enable the patent owner to address any
`additional challenges added to the proceeding. Additionally, cases near the end of the 12-month statutory deadline may
`be extended, on a case-by-case basis, if required to afford all parties a full and fair opportunity to be heard. In such cases,
`the panel may adjust other procedural dates as necessary. 
`
`Upon receipt of an order supplementing the institution decision, the petitioner and patent owner shall meet and confer to
`discuss the need for additional briefing and/or any other adjustments to the schedule. While the Board may act sua sponte
`in some cases, additional briefing and schedule adjustments might not be ordered if not requested by the parties.
`Additionally, the parties may agree to affirmatively waive additional briefing or schedule changes. After meeting and
`conferring, the parties then shall contact the Board to discuss any requested additional briefing and/or schedule changes.
`It is expected that the parties will work cooperatively amongst themselves to resolve disputes and propose reasonable
`modifications to the schedule. Any remaining disputes shall be raised in a conference call with the Board. For details, the
`parties are commended to the order supplementing the institution decision entered in their particular case, and shall
`follow the instructions provided by the Board in such order. 
`
`The final written decision will address, to the extent claims are still pending at the time of decision, all patent claims
`challenged by the petitioner and all new claims added through the amendment process.  
`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/patent-trial-and-appeal-board/trials/guidance-impact-sas-aia-trial
`
`1/2
`
`Patent Owner Gree, Inc.
`Exhibit 2001 - Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`5/10/2018
`Guidance on the impact of SAS on AIA trial proceedings | USPTO
`If parties have any questions about the impacts of the SAS decision, the parties may contact the panel (if case-specific) or
`submit questions in writing to the Board’s Trials@uspto.gov email box (if general).
`
`The PTAB will host a “Chat with the Chief” webinar on Monday, April 30, 2018, from noon to 1 p.m. ET to discuss the SAS
`decision, its impacts on AIA trial proceedings, and answer questions. 
`

`
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/patent-trial-and-appeal-board/trials/guidance-impact-sas-aia-trial
`
`2/2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket