throbber
J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`DOI 10.1007/s11746-009-1423-2
`
`O R I G I N A L P A P E R
`
`A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Melting Points of Fatty Acids
`and Esters Determined by Differential Scanning Calorimetry
`
`Gerhard Knothe Æ Robert O. Dunn
`
`Received: 16 January 2009 / Revised: 26 May 2009 / Accepted: 5 June 2009 / Published online: 26 June 2009
`Ó AOCS 2009
`
`Abstract The melting point is one of the most important
`physical properties of a chemical compound and it plays a
`significant role in determining possible applications. For
`fatty acid esters the melting point is essential for a variety
`of food and non-food applications, the latter including
`biodiesel and its cold-flow properties. In this work, the
`melting points of fatty acids and esters (methyl, ethyl,
`propyl, butyl) in the C8–C24 range were determined by
`differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), many of which for
`the first time. Data for triacylglycerols as well as ricinoleic
`acid and its methyl and ethyl esters were also acquired. For
`some compounds whose melting points have been previ-
`ously reported, data discrepancies exist and a comprehen-
`sive determination by DSC has not been available.
`Variations in the present data up to several °C compared to
`data in prior literature were observed. The melting points
`of some methyl-branched iso- and anteiso-acids and esters
`were also determined. Previously unreported systematic
`effects of compound structure on melting point are pre-
`including those for x-9 monounsaturated fatty
`sented,
`acids and esters as well as for methyl-branched iso and
`anteiso fatty acids and esters. The melting point of a pure
`fatty acid or ester as determined by DSC can vary up to
`
`Product names are necessary to report factually on available data;
`however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of
`the product, and the use of the name by USDA implies no approval of
`the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable.
`G. Knothe (&) R. O. Dunn
`US Department of Agriculture,
`Agricultural Research Service,
`National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research,
`1815 N. University St, Peoria, IL 61604, USA
`e-mail: gerhard.knothe@ars.usda.gov
`
`approximately 1 °C. Other thermal data, including heat
`flow and melting onset temperatures are briefly discussed.
`Keywords Fatty acids Differential scanning
`calorimetry Butyl esters Ethyl esters Melting point
`Methyl esters Propyl esters
`
`Introduction
`
`The melting point (MP) of a substance is one of its most
`important physical properties. It plays a major role in
`determining the suitability and applicability of a substance
`in countless food and non-food applications. Numerous
`structural factors influence the MP of an organic com-
`pound, including the molecular weight, the number and
`configuration of double bonds, triple bonds, branching,
`stereochemistry, and the presence of one or more polar
`groups
`such as OH, with interrelationships existing
`between these features for specific compounds or classes of
`compounds. These effects are also observed in long-chain
`fatty compounds.
`Several reasons prompted the present investigation of
`the MP of fatty compounds. First, while MP data for many
`common fatty acids and esters are given in reference works
`[1–5] or primary literature [6–10], such data for many other
`similar compounds are not readily available. Especially
`data for compounds with MP at lower temperatures (below
`ambient) are often less readily available. Therefore, in this
`work additional MP data are provided that are not or not
`readily available in the existing literature including several
`new systematic structure-property effects. Furthermore,
`most MP data that are routinely used were determined with
`varying equipment before the advent or more widespread
`use of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Thus a
`
`123
`
`Purdue 2014
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

`

`844
`
`J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`
`second goal of this work is to provide compile and evaluate
`such information using DSC. It may be noted that photo-
`pyroelectric measurements of melting phenomena provide
`information complementary to DSC [11]. A third reason is
`that MP data compiled from the literature (Tables 1, 2)
`display discrepancies for many compounds, providing an
`incentive to determine more accurate values.
`Previous work has shown that the melting and crystal-
`lization behavior of fatty acids and esters depend strongly
`on structural features such as chain length, position and
`configuration of double or
`triple bonds or
`functional
`groups, with some systematic effects of the structure on
`MP having been established. It was recognized early [12]
`that the MP of a saturated fatty acid with an odd number of
`carbon atoms is slightly lower than that of the even-num-
`bered fatty acid with one less carbon atom, an observation
`confirmed by later studies cited above. Besides the afore-
`mentioned studies on common fatty acids and esters, other
`literature reports MP data with systematic influences for
`fatty acids and esters with a variety of structures, including
`octadecynoic [7, 13], pentadecynoic acids [13], methyl
`epoxyoctadecanoates [14], methyl-substituted octadeca-
`noic acids [15], vinyl fatty acids [16], and wax esters [17].
`Recently, melting data of some methyl and iso-propyl
`esters of branched (iso and anteiso) acids [18] and various
`oleates [19] were reported.
`An increasingly common industrial application of fatty
`esters is biodiesel [20, 21], defined as the mono-alkyl esters
`of vegetable oils or animal fats. While biodiesel is gener-
`ally technically competitive with conventional diesel fuel
`derived from petroleum (petrodiesel), it features advanta-
`ges in terms of domestic production, renewability, reduc-
`tion of most regulated exhaust emissions except nitrogen
`oxides, biodegradability, inherent lubricity, and safer han-
`dling due to higher flash point. Technical problems with
`biodiesel include nitrogen oxides exhaust emissions, oxi-
`dative stability and cold flow. The latter problem is
`exemplified by the relatively high cloud and pour points of
`biodiesel [22]. A major factor influencing this cold flow
`behavior is the high MP of saturated fatty esters found in
`biodiesel.
`Data analyzed from DSC melting and cooling (freezing)
`curves were correlated with measured cold flow properties
`of biodiesel [23]. Both cloud point (CP) and low-temper-
`ature flow test (LTFT) data indicated good probabilities of
`correlating to melting curve peak maximum temperatures.
`Completion of melt temperatures from DSC melting curves
`were used to predict crystallization temperatures of FAME
`from conventional and low-palmitic acid soybean oil [24]
`and mono-alkyl esters from tallow and waste grease [25,
`26].
`Thus cold flow is a major factor when considering which
`fatty esters to enrich in biodiesel when ‘‘designing’’ an
`
`123
`
`optimized biodiesel fuel composition. In recent work, it
`was discussed that esters of palmitoleic acid and decanoic
`acid may be candidate compounds for enrichment in bio-
`diesel to help improve cold flow while not comprising
`other important fuel properties [27]. Biodiesel produced by
`transesterification of oils or fats with medium—(C2 or C4)
`or branched—chain alcohols, instead of the more com-
`monly used methanol, generally has better cold flow
`properties [24–26, 28–30]. Thus, for determining optimum
`mono-alkyl fatty ester compositions and for modeling the
`cold flow behavior of mixtures of esters such as biodiesel,
`accurate and consistent MP data are critical, thus providing
`another reason for this study.
`In light of the issues mentioned above, in this work the
`MP of fatty acids as well as a variety of methyl, ethyl and
`other alkyl esters,
`including fatty acids with methyl
`branching (iso and anteiso fatty acid chains) in the C8–C24
`range, which covers the most common fatty acids, were
`determined by DSC. The MP of numerous compounds
`previously not investigated for this property were deter-
`mined. Systematic influences for x-9 fatty acids and esters
`as well as methyl-branched iso acids and methyl esters are
`presented for the first time. The results are compared to
`literature data.
`
`Experimental
`
`Straight-chain fatty acids and esters were obtained from Nu
`Chek Prep (Elysian, MN). Branched fatty acids and esters
`were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI) or
`Matreya LLC (Pleasant Gap, PA). To ensure purity and
`nature of
`the samples, some samples were randomly
`checked by GC-MS and NMR (solvent CDCl3; 500 MHz
`for 1H-NMR, 125 MHz for 13C-NMR). All samples were
`found to be of advertised purities or higher ([98–99%).
`NMR also served structure verification purposes, including
`the double bond position for unsaturated fatty acids and
`esters. The position and separation of the olefinic carbon
`signals in 13C-NMR of monounsaturated fatty acid chains
`depends on the proximity of the double bond to the ter-
`minal ester or methyl group [31]. Thus, for a double bond
`‘‘migrating’’ from the 5- to the 15-position in the mono-
`unsaturated samples investigated here, a decrease in the
`difference of the signals of the olefinic carbons from
`2.9 ppm (C20:1 D5) to 0.03 ppm (C22:1 D13) to 0 ppm
`(C23:1 D14 and C24:1 D15) was observed.
`Differential scanning calorimetry analysis is based on
`determining heat flow through a sample by simultaneous
`measurements through a sample pan and an empty refer-
`ence pan. Hermetically sealed aluminum pans were used
`for
`the present analyses. A computer-controlled DSC
`model Q2000 (TA Instruments, Wilmington, DE) was used
`
`Purdue 2014
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

`

`J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`
`845
`
`Table 1 Literature data for melting points (°C) of saturated straight-chain fatty acids and esters investigated here
`
`Chain Acid
`
`Methyl ester
`
`Ethyl ester
`
`Propyl ester
`
`Butyl ester
`
`Triacylglycerol
`
`8:0
`
`16.5 [1, 3]; 16.3 [2]
`
`16, 16.5 [4]
`
`16 [5]
`
`-40 [1–3]
`
`-37.27 [5]
`
`9:0
`
`12.2 [1], 12.3 [2],
`
`-35 [4]
`
`12.4 [3]
`
`12.5, 15 [4]
`
`12.52 [5]
`
`10:0
`
`31.5 fr [1]; 31.9 [2],
`
`31.4 [3]
`
`31.6, 31.5 [4]
`
`31.39 [5], 31.0 [5]
`
`-18 [1–3]
`
`-13.34 [5]
`
`-43.1 [1–3]
`
`-43.1 [5]
`
`-36.7 [1–3]
`
`-44.5 [4]
`
`-36.7 [5]
`
`-20 [1–3]
`
`-19.9 [5]
`
`11:0
`
`28.6 [1–3]
`
`-16 [1], -15 [2, 3]
`
`29.3, 28.2–28.6 [4]
`
`28.20 [5]
`
`-15 [5]
`
`-46.2 [1–3]
`
`-42.9 [1–3]
`
`-45 [3]
`
`-43 [3]
`
`-38 [2, 3]
`
`-38 [4]
`
`32 [3]
`
`32 [4]
`
`31.2 [4]
`
`12:0
`
`44 [1], 43.2 [2], 43.8 [3]
`
`5.2 FP [1], 5.2 [2, 3] -1.8 FP [1], -10 [2, 3]
`
`-7 [4]
`
`46.4 [1]
`
`44.8, 44 [4]
`
`44.1 [5], 44.2 [5]
`
`13:0
`
`41.5 [2, 3]
`
`41.8, 44.5–45.5 [4]
`
`41.76 FP [5]
`
`14:0
`
`58 [1], 53.9 [2],
`
`54.2 [3]
`
`54.4, 54 [4]
`
`5 [4]
`
`4.80 [5]
`
`6.5 [2, 3]
`
`6.5 [4]
`
`5.5 [5]
`
`19 [1–3]
`
`18.5 [4]
`
`17.86 [5]
`
`18.8–19.1 [9]
`
`-15.5 [5]
`
`-4.8 [5]
`
`44.5 [4]
`
`12–13 [1], 12.3
`
`9.4–10.0 [9]
`
`6.2–7.0 [9]
`
`56.5 [2], 58.5 [3]
`
`[2, 3]
`
`12.3 [4]
`
`11 [5]
`
`58.5 [4]
`
`57.4 [5], 54.25 [5]
`
`15:0
`
`53–54 [1], 52.3 [2, 3]
`
`18.5 [1–3]
`
`52.5, 53 [4]
`
`52.40 [5]
`
`16:0
`
`63 [1], 63.1 [2],
`
`62.5 [3]
`
`62.9, 63–64 [4]
`
`62.8–63.0 [5]
`
`18.5 [4]
`
`18.5 [5]
`
`19.2–19.4 [9]
`
`30 [1–3]
`
`30.5 [4]
`
`29.5 [5]
`
`30.0–30.3 [9]
`
`17:0
`
`62–63 [1], 61.3 [2, 3]
`
`30 [1–3]
`
`61.3, 62–63 [4]
`
`60.85 [5]
`
`18:0
`
`71.2 [1], 68.8 [2],
`
`69.3 [3]
`
`70.1, 69.7 [4]
`
`68.9 [5], 69.5 [5]
`
`19:0
`
`69.4 [1–3]
`
`69.4, 68.7 [4]
`
`68.6 [5]
`
`30 [4]
`
`29 [5]
`
`29.7–30.2 [9]
`
`39.1 [1–3]
`
`39.1 [4]
`
`37.85 [5]
`
`41.3 [n]
`
`38.9 [4]
`
`39.5–40.5 [5]
`
`38.7–39.0 [9]
`
`12.6–13.0 [9]
`
`14 [4]
`
`11.5 [5]
`
`12.7–13.2 [9]
`
`11.9–12.1 [9]
`
`6.8–7.1 [9]
`
`a: 24 b: 19.3 [1],
`
`20.4 [1, 2]
`
`16.9 [1–3]
`
`66.4 [1], 66.5 [2.3]
`
`24 [2, 3]
`
`19.3 [4]
`
`23.2 [5]
`
`24.3–24.8 [9]
`
`28 [1, 2]
`
`25.2 [5]
`
`25.0–25.4 [9]
`
`20.9–21.9 [9]
`
`16.8–17.1 [9]
`
`66.4 [4]
`
`24.2–24.7 [7, 9]
`
`20.4–21.0 [9]
`
`64 [4]
`
`31–33 [1], 33
`
`28.9 [1, 2]
`
`27.5 [1, 2],
`
`73 [1]
`
`[2]
`
`33.4 [4]
`
`33.5 [5]
`
`37–38 [5]
`
`35.7–36.2 [9]
`
`28.6 [4]
`
`30.8–31.4
`
`[7]
`
`73.5 [4]
`
`27[3]
`
`27.5 [4]
`
`26.6–27.2 [7]
`
`33.0–33.9 [7]
`
`29.2–31.4 [7]
`
`71 [4]
`
`123
`
`Purdue 2014
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

`

`846
`
`Table 1 continued
`
`J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`
`Chain Acid
`
`Methyl ester
`
`Ethyl ester
`
`Propyl ester
`
`Butyl ester
`
`Triacylglycerol
`
`20:0
`
`77 [1], 76.5 [2, 3]
`
`54.5 [1–3]
`
`76.1, 77 [4]
`
`73.35 [5]
`
`45.8–46.3 [4]
`
`45.8 [5]
`
`50 [1, 2]
`
`41.4–42 [4]
`
`40.54 [5]
`
`45.8–46.3 [9]
`
`41.4–42.0 [9]
`
`21:0
`
`75.2, 73–74 [3]
`
`74.3 [4]
`
`48–50 [3]
`
`48–49 [4]
`
`46.7–47.0 [8]
`
`22:0
`
`80 [1], 81 [2], 81.5 [3]
`
`54 [1–3]
`
`80, 81–82 [4]
`
`79.95 [5]
`
`54 [4]
`
`53.2 [5]
`
`45 [4]
`
`44.3–44.5 [8]
`
`50 [1, 2]
`
`50 [4]
`
`48.25 [5]
`
`52.2–52.8 [9]
`
`47.8–48.5 [9]
`
`23:0
`
`79.6, 79.1 [4]
`
`79.1 [5]
`
`24:0
`
`87.5 [2, 3]
`
`55.6 [1]
`
`53.4 [4]
`
`55–56 [5]
`
`53.3–53.5 [9]
`
`59.5–60 [4]
`
`84.2, 87.5–88 [4]
`
`57.8 [5]
`
`52–53 [5]
`
`50.8–51.2 [9]
`
`56–57 [4]
`
`54.35 [5]
`
`84.15 [5]
`
`57.8–58.3 [9]
`
`54.2–54.5 [9]
`
`FP freezing point
`
`38.3–39.0 [7]
`
`36.6–36.8 [7]
`
`78 [4]
`
`42.4–43.1 [6]
`
`40.1–40.4 [6]
`
`75.9 [4]
`
`45.7–46.2 [7]
`
`43.8–44.1 [7]
`
`82.5 [3]
`
`48.4–49.2 [7]
`
`47.3–47.5 [9]
`
`51.8–52.3 [7]
`
`50.6–50.8 [9]
`
`86 [4]
`
`for determining the melting phase transitions of experi-
`mental samples. The system consisted of a measurement
`cell fitted with a refrigerated cooling system and a model
`5000 PC-based controller for conducting experiments and
`analyzing the resulting scans. Reference and sample pans
`were placed in precise positions within the cell by an
`autosampler. The sample purge gas was dry nitrogen at
`50.00 mL/min.
`Melting phase transitions were analyzed by the proce-
`dure given in American Oil Chemists’ Society (AOCS)
`method Cj 1-94 [32]. The three-step temperature program
`consisted of: (1) heating the sample to the starting tem-
`perature and holding it isothermally for 10 min to ensure
`complete transition into the liquid phase; (2) cooling
`rapidly to form a solid phase and holding for 30 min; and
`(3) heating at 5 °C/min back across the melting region to
`the final temperature.
`While DSC instruments are commonly calibrated with
`indium, the performance of the instrument at temperatures
`below the MP of indium (156.79 °C; enthalpy of melt-
`ing = 28.66 J/g) was checked with additional materials due
`to the lower MP of fatty esters. Thus benzil, a common MP
`standard, and water were selected as compounds for com-
`parison. The peak melting temperature values for benzil and
`water (distilled) were 94.37 (average of three determina-
`tions; standard deviation 0.08) and -0.04 °C (three deter-
`minations,
`standard deviation 0.34),
`respectively. A
`literature value for the MP of benzil is 94.87 °C [3].
`
`For each DSC peak, an onset, peak and completion
`temperature (Ton, Tpeak, Tcom, respectively) can be deter-
`mined directly from the scan by use of the system software.
`As discussed below, Tpeak is given in the tables as MP.
`Typical scans are shown in Figs. 1 and 2.
`
`Results and Discussion
`
`In this work, the MP of saturated and unsaturated fatty
`acids and esters with chain lengths C8–C24 were deter-
`mined by DSC using AOCS method Cj 1-94. The exam-
`ined chain length range covers most fatty acids as they
`occur naturally in vegetable oils or animal fats. Several
`methyl-branched saturated acids of the iso (branching at
`Cn-1 in the chain) and anteiso (branching at Cn-2) types
`were also studied. Typical DSC heating scans are shown in
`Figs. 1 and 2. Tables 1, 2 and 3 contain literature data on
`the MP of compounds investigated here while Tables 4, 5,
`6, and 7 present data determined during the course of this
`work. Table 4 presents the MP of saturated fatty acids,
`methyl esters, ethyl esters as well as some propyl and butyl
`esters for this range of fatty acid chain lengths. Table 5
`lists the same information for a variety of olefinic fatty
`acids and esters with chain lengths C11–C24. Table 6 gives
`this information for some methyl-branched (mainly iso
`and anteiso) acids and esters with a total of C11–C20
`including the methyl branch. The MP of triacylglycerols
`
`123
`
`Purdue 2014
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

`

`J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`
`847
`
`Table 2 Literature data for melting points (°C) of unsaturated fatty acids and esters investigated here
`
`Chain
`
`Acid
`
`Methyl ester
`
`Ethyl ester
`
`Propyl ester Butyl ester
`
`Triacylglycerol
`
`-27.5 [2, 3]
`
`-27.5 FP [4]
`
`-27.5 [5]
`
`-38 [2, 3]
`
`-37.5 [5]
`
`\15 [5]
`
`\15 [5]
`
`C11:1 D10
`
`C14:1 D9c
`
`C16:1 D9c
`
`C16:1 D9t
`C18:1 D6c
`
`24.5 [2, 3]
`
`24.5 [4]
`
`24–24.5 [5]
`
`-4 [2]
`
`-4.5 [4]
`
`-4.5 to -4 [5]
`
`-0.1 [2], 0.5 [3]
`
`0.5 [4]
`
`-1.0 [5]
`
`32, 32–33 [4]
`
`29.8 [3], 29, 31, 33 [4]
`
`31 [10]
`
`28–29 [6], 29 [8]
`
`28.6 [5]
`
`C18:1 D6t
`
`52.7–53.4, 54–59 [4]
`
`53 [10]
`
`53-54 [6], 54 [8]
`
`53.6 [5]
`
`28 [4]
`
`52 [4]
`
`C18:1 D9c
`
`16.3 [1], 13.4 [2, 3]
`
`-19.9 [1–3]
`
`\-15 [5]
`
`-26.4 [1–3] -5.5 [1], -32 [2], -4 [3]
`
`12 (lab), 16 (stab), 16.2 [4] -19.6 to -19.9 [5]
`
`-26.4 [4]
`
`5 [4]
`
`13.2 [5]
`
`13 [10]
`
`10–11 [6], 11 [8]
`
`C18:1 D9t
`
`45 [1–3]
`
`C18:1 D11c
`
`45.5, 45–45.5 [4]
`
`43.68 [5]
`
`44 [10]
`
`44.5–45.5 [6], 45 [8]
`
`15.5, 14.5–15.5 [4]
`
`13–14 [5]
`
`15 [10]
`
`12.5–13.5 [6], 13 [8]
`
`C18:1 D11t
`
`44 [2, 3]
`
`C18:1 D9c,12c
`
`44.1, 43.5–44.1 [4]
`
`43.5–44.5 [5]
`
`44 [10]
`
`43.5–44.5 [6], 44 [8]
`
`-5 [1]
`
`-5 [2]
`
`-5 [10]
`
`-5.2 to -5.0 [5]
`C18:1 D9c, 12c, 15c -11.3 [1]
`
`-11 [2]
`
`-11 [10]
`
`-11.3 to -11 [5]
`
`27, 26–27 [4]
`
`52.5–54 [4]
`
`23–23.5 [4]
`
`C20:1 D5c
`C20:1 5t
`C20:1 D9c
`
`13.5 [3]
`
`13–13.5 [4]
`\15 [5]
`
`5.8 [3]
`
`5.1 [4]
`
`-12.5 [4]
`
`10.6 [4]
`
`\15 [5]
`
`-11 [4]
`
`-35 [1, 3]
`\15 [5]
`
`-45.5 [3]
`\15 [5]
`
`123
`
`Purdue 2014
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

`

`848
`
`Table 2 continued
`
`Chain
`
`C20:1 D9t
`C20:1 D11c
`
`C20:1 D11t
`
`Acid
`
`54 [4]
`
`24 [2, 3]
`
`25, 24–25 [4]
`
`22 [5]
`
`49–51 [4]
`
`53–54 [5]
`
`J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`
`Methyl ester
`
`Ethyl ester
`
`Propyl ester Butyl ester
`
`Triacylglycerol
`
`-45 [4]
`
`-15 [5]
`
`C22:1 D13c
`
`33–34 [1], 33.5 [2],
`
`2–3 94 [5]
`
`32 [4]
`
`34–35 [4]
`
`34–35 [5]
`
`30.5 [4]
`
`30–30.5 [5]
`
`58 [4]
`
`-14.10°C
`
`146.2J/g
`
`-13.06°C
`
`34.7 [3]
`
`33.5 (-51, -7, 2, 14) [4]
`
`33.5 [5]
`
`C22:1 D13t
`
`61.5 [1], 61.9 [2, 3]
`
`C24:1 D15c
`
`61.5 [4]
`
`60 [5]
`
`39–39.5 [5]
`
`45–41 [4]
`
`1
`
`0
`
`-1
`
`-2
`
`-3
`
`Heat Flow (W/g)
`
`Fig. 1 DSC heating scan of
`methyl decanoate (data included
`in calculation in Table 5)
`
`-4
`-100
`
`-80
`
`-60
`
`-20
`-40
`Temperature (°C)
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`(triglycerides) of fatty acids with chain lengths C8–C24 are
`contained in Table 7. Figs. 3, 4 and 5 are visualizations of
`the data in Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7.
`
`Procedure
`
`For sake of brevity and reasons given below, only the values
`of Tpeak are given in Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7. Although gen-
`erally an increase in heat flow was observable for increased
`chain lengths, heat flow varied considerably and was
`probably affected by how the sample itself was distributed
`within the pan. Therefore, no heat flow data are given. The
`variability of heat flow was confirmed by analyzing some
`samples sequentially five times. The heat flow decreased
`considerably within such a sequence, being only a fraction
`of the initial value when the fifth run was conducted.
`
`Melting onset and completion can also be determined by
`DSC and these parameters are usually reported when
`AOCS method Cj 1-94 is applied to analyze oils and fats.
`However,
`these temperatures,
`rather
`the differences
`between melting peak maxima and onset and completion
`temperatures, also depend on the amount of sample, so that
`the melting onset and completion temperatures are not
`given here. The values for Tpeak appear to be less influ-
`enced by this aspect. Generally, the difference between
`melting onset temperature and peak temperature (given as
`MP) was greater (range of 1.5–3 °C) than that between
`peak temperature and melting completion temperature
`(range 0.5–1.5 °C). The peak melting temperature is given
`as MP in Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7. It may be noted that, for
`example, the peak melting temperature given for water and
`benzil (see ‘‘Experimental’’ section) is the closest of all
`
`123
`
`Purdue 2014
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

`

`J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`
`849
`
`-7.59°C
`
`11.34°C
`
`28.59J/g
`
`-5.90°C
`
`150.6J/g
`
`1
`
`0
`
`-1
`
`-2
`
`Heat Flow (W/g)
`
`Fig. 2 DSC heating scan of
`oleic acid (data included in
`calculation in Table 5)
`
`-3
`-100
`
`-80
`
`-60
`
`-40
`
`0
`-20
`Temperature (°C)
`
`12.64°C
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`Table 3 Literature data for melting points (°C) of branched fatty
`acids and esters investigated here
`
`Branched (iso)a
`
`Acid
`
`Methyl ester
`
`materials exhibiting such behavior is beyond the scope of
`this work. In order to record any such observations, peaks
`indicating polymorphism are indicated in Tables 4 and 5
`by peak maxima given in italics. The MP given correspond
`to the stable modification of the compounds investigated
`here. Note that in case of discrepancies with literature
`values, the MP determined here are usually either slightly
`lower than the previous literature values or tend towards
`the lower end of reported values.
`
`Comparison to Prior Data
`
`The data in Tables 1, 2 and 3 show that in many cases the
`MP data in the literature agree well with data observed
`here. However, in some cases significant differences can be
`observed. Furthermore, there are numerous cases in which
`prior literature data vary, so that the present data can be
`used to verify or confirm more accurate data.
`Results for several compounds deviated considerably
`from reported literature data. The MP was -2 °C in the
`present work for ethyl dodecanoate compared with lower
`literature values of -10 and -15 °C (Table 1). Likewise,
`the MP of propyl heptadecanoate was 22.3 °C compared
`with 24.2-24.7 °C in the literature. Similar observations
`were made for comparison of results with literature values
`in Table 2 with corresponding data for alkyl oleates. Propyl
`oleate has MP = -30.5 versus -27.2 °C from the litera-
`ture (Table 2); butyl oleate has MP = -34.8 versus -26.4
`to -31.7 °C (Table 2); and butyl elaidate has MP = 0.2
`versus 10.6 °C. The MP of methyl linoleate was -43.1 °C
`in the present work though some scans showed a minor
`peak near -37.8 °C, compared with a value of -35 °C
`from the literature. Methyl cis-11-eicosenoate had an
`MP = -7.8 °C for the present work, a value that was
`than -45 °C as reported in the
`considerably higher
`literature.
`
`123
`
`10-Me C11
`
`12-Me C14
`
`13-Me C14
`
`14-Me C15
`
`15-Me C16
`
`16-Me C17
`
`17-Me C18
`
`41.2 [4]
`
`41.2 [5]
`
`53 [4]
`
`50.5–51 [5]
`
`52.5–53 [4]
`
`61.8–62.4 [4]
`
`61.8–62.4 [5]
`
`60.3–60.5 [4]
`
`68.8–69.7 [5]
`
`67.3–67.8 [4]
`
`67.3–67.8 [5]
`
`66.5–67 [15]
`
`18-Me C19
`
`75.3 [5]
`
`Branched (anteiso)
`
`10–Me C12
`
`12-Me C14
`
`13-Me C15
`
`14-Me C16
`
`2.7 [18]
`
`16.5 [18]
`
`18.3–18.9 [4]
`
`25.7 [18]
`
`26/27.5 [4]
`
`26–28 [5]
`
`-31.8 [18]
`
`-10.9 [18]
`
`65–66 [5]
`
`(S): 39.5–40, 39–40 [4]
`
`3.8 [18]
`
`a For example, the acid termed 10-Me C11 is 10-methyl undecanoic
`acid with 11 carbons in the chain but possessing a total of 12 carbon
`atoms when counting the branching at C11
`
`three temperatures (onset, peak, melting) to its known MP,
`providing a justification for using only this value.
`Variations in the DSC-based MP determinations of up to
`approximately ±1 °C were observed. The MP points of all
`samples were thus determined at least in triplicate. The
`resulting standard deviation (SD) for a sample is given in
`parentheses in Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7.
`The DSC scans of some compounds investigated here
`are more complex than only exhibiting one peak corre-
`sponding to the MP. Investigating the polymorphism of all
`
`Purdue 2014
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

`

`850
`
`J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`
`52.32(0.44),51.17(1.22)
`
`45.29(0.17)
`
`55.92(0.16)
`
`51.22(0.73)
`
`48.64(0.25)
`
`43.66(0.37),36.30(0.28)
`
`35.14(0.07),20.27(0.02),23.60(0.23)
`
`37.15(0.07),31.99(0.09)
`
`41.33(0.66)
`
`30.71(0.03),15.84(0.06),18.87(0.10)
`
`32.94(0.24),25.36(0.15)
`
`35.28(0.41),27.30(0.53)
`
`38.03(0.31),31.89(0.13)
`
`25.63(0.18),10.51(0.11),14.09(0.14)
`
`28.10(0.30),24.93(0.81)
`
`32.98(0.33),30.43(0.33)
`
`37.66(0.25)
`
`19.68(0.20),9.18(0.23)
`
`16.07(0.26)
`
`6.26(0.06),3.82(0.31)
`
`5.57(0.12)
`
`-8.48(0.25)
`
`-6.53(0.19),-7.42(0.09)
`
`-23.69(0.14)
`
`-22.96(0.21)
`
`-43.10(0.10)
`
`-43.33(0.06)
`
`Butylester
`
`22.32(17.81)
`
`20.27(0.23)
`
`24.70(0.32),19.92(0.41)
`23.23(0.42)
`
`9.24(0.37)
`
`-4.35(0.19)
`
`-19.70(0.08)
`
`-21.84(0.19)
`
`-41.81(0.13)
`
`-45.68(0.32)
`
`Propylester
`
`11.81(0.29)
`
`12.52(0.60)
`
`-2.07(0.22)
`
`-1.78(0.24)
`
`-19.43(0.41)
`
`-20.44(0.42)
`
`-43.56(0.22)
`
`-44.74(0.14)
`
`Ethylester
`
`5.17(0.35)
`
`4.30(0.54)
`
`Standarddeviationsinparentheses.Secondarypeakslikelyindicatingadditionalphasetransitionsareitalicized
`
`58.61(0.71)
`
`53.38(0.45)
`
`53.22(0.26)
`
`47.58(0.34)
`
`46.43(0.38)
`
`28.58(0.06),25.85(0.37)
`28.48(0.44)
`
`18.47(0.50)
`
`18.09(0.42)
`
`83.82(0.42)
`
`78.74(0.26)
`
`79.54(0.34)
`
`73.69(0.34)
`
`74.76(0.27)
`
`67.76(0.27),66.53(0.23)
`
`69.29(0.19)
`
`60.85(0.34),57.27(0.15)
`62.20(0.19)
`
`52.15(0.17),46.00(0.35)
`
`53.47(0.31),50.52(0.16)
`
`41.37(0.20),34.64(0.46)
`
`43.29(0.34),42.96(0.03)
`
`-12.17(0.33)
`
`27.32(0.05),17.42(0.26)
`
`-13.48(0.52)
`
`30.80(0.31)
`
`-34.99(0.53)
`
`11.28(0.50),-9.31(0.19)
`
`-37.43(0.26)
`
`15.41(0.18)
`
`24:0
`
`23:0
`
`22:0
`
`21:0
`
`20:0
`
`19:0
`
`18:0
`
`17:0
`
`16:0
`
`15:0
`
`14:0
`
`13:0
`
`12:0
`
`11:0
`
`10:0
`
`9:0
`
`8:0
`
`Table4Meltingpoints(°C)ofsaturatedfattyacidsandestersdeterminedinthepresentwork
`
`Methylester
`
`Acid
`
`Chain
`
`123
`
`Purdue 2014
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

`

`J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`
`851
`
`aSingledetermination
`Secondarypeakslikelyindicatingadditionalphasetransitionsareitalicized
`
`123
`
`-22.69
`
`-58.61a
`-51.50(0.63)
`
`-57.63a
`
`-0.23(0.03),-0.55
`
`-0.03(0.60)
`
`-30.50(0.34)-34.76(0.43)
`
`-11.35(0.14)
`
`-24.35(0.12)
`
`-12.83(0.16)
`
`-52.61(0.36),-54.10(0.14)
`
`-66.19(0.07)
`
`1.21(0.42)
`
`13.27(0.15)
`
`24.50(0.34)
`
`-10.54(0.22)
`
`5.63(0.32),3.00(0.06)
`
`14.11(0.43)
`
`-8.80(0.26)
`
`3.14(0.75)
`
`9.49(0.28)
`
`18.22(0.13)
`
`29.36(0.14)
`
`8.47(0.15)
`
`20.76(0.41)
`
`-7.79(0.34)
`
`9.11(0.43)
`
`-8.57(0.45),-46.95(0.51),-18.92(0.44)
`-7.51(0.36)
`-61.71a
`
`2.39(0.20),-45.52(0.21)
`-2.33(0.49)
`
`-43.09(0.71),-37.77(0.02)-56.72(0.57),-58.80(1.23)
`
`4.10(0.32)
`
`-36.49(0.68)
`
`4.17(0.36)
`
`-20.32(0.36)
`
`9.45(0.30)
`
`-7.74(0.49)
`
`-20.02(0.32),-21.94(0.41)
`
`-10.99(0.29)
`
`9.94(0.24)
`
`-24.29(0.72)
`
`9.94(0.24)
`
`-20.21(0.51)
`
`19.16(0.20)
`
`-0.97(0.26)
`
`-16.02(0.26)
`
`-2.99(0.39)
`
`-34.10(0.26),-43.53(0.14)-36.65(0.29)
`
`-65.35(0.38)
`
`-32.24(0.31)
`
`-52.26(0.82)
`
`-24.63(0.23)
`
`32.96(0.14)
`
`51.94(0.31)
`
`23.37(0.14)(-4.68),
`
`35.13(0.26)(34.09)
`
`26.61(0.57)(4.92)
`
`22.47(0.29)
`
`-7.15(0.69)
`
`43.37(0.65)
`
`15.40(0.29)
`
`43.35(0.24)
`
`12.82(0.15),-5.59(0.30)
`
`52.38(0.22)
`
`29.11(0.14)
`
`15.05(0.19),-0.62
`
`32.22(0.33)
`
`1.22(0.46),-23.77(2.69)
`
`-3.91(1.17)
`
`23.91(0.14)
`
`24:1D15c
`23:1D14c
`22:1D13t
`22:1D13c
`21:1D12
`20:1D11t
`20:1D11c
`20:1D8c
`20:1D5c
`19:1D10c
`18:3D9c,D12c,D15c-11.58a
`18:2D9c,D12c
`18:1D11t
`18:1D11c
`18:1D9t
`18:1D9c
`18:1D6t
`18:1D6c
`17:1D10c
`16:1D9t
`16:1D9c
`14:1D9c
`11:1D10
`
`42.87(0.27)
`
`43.23(0.11),39.28(0.23)
`
`59.16(0.39)
`
`32.18(0.37),7.69(0.19),29.16(0.62)-3.05(0.43)
`
`Butylester
`
`Propylester
`
`Ethylester
`
`Methylester
`
`Acid
`
`Chain
`
`Table5Meltingpoints(°C)ofunsaturatedfattyacidsandestersdeterminedinthepresentwork
`
`Purdue 2014
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

`

`852
`
`J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`
`Table 6 Melting points (°C) of some branched fatty acids and methyl
`esters determined in the present work
`
`Chain
`
`Iso acids
`
`10-Methyl C11
`
`11-Methyl C12
`
`12-Methyl C13
`
`13-Methyl C14
`
`14-Methyl C15 (isopalmitic)
`
`15-Methyl C16
`
`16-Methyl C17 (isostearic)
`
`17-Methyl C18
`
`18-Methyl C19
`
`19-Methyl C20
`
`Anteiso acids
`
`12-Methyl C14
`
`13-Methyl C15
`
`14-Methyl C16
`
`Acid
`
`Methyl ester
`
`40.28
`
`40.57
`
`53.13
`
`51.35
`
`61.94
`
`59.78
`
`69.23
`
`66.34
`
`74.68
`
`72.51
`
`24.05
`
`37.10
`
`-13.02
`
`-6.87
`
`3.48
`
`6.37
`
`16.80
`
`17.55
`
`26.82
`
`27.98
`
`36.43
`
`-5.29
`
`-13.34
`
`7.62
`
`The present data can also be employed to verify more
`accurate data reported in the literature. For example, ethyl
`nonanoate had a MP = -43.6 °C (Table 4) compared to
`values of -36.7 and -44.4 °C in Table 1. Other examples
`included methyl decanoate (MP = -13.5 herein vs. -18 to
`-13 °C in the literature), ethyl heptadecanoate (24.7 vs.
`25–28 °C), methyl eicosanoate (MP = 46.4 vs. 46–
`54.5 °C), ethyl eicosanoate (MP = 41.3 vs. 41–50 °C), and
`tetracosanoic acid (83.8 vs. 84–88 °C). The common
`methyl palmitate had MP = 28.5 °C in comparison with
`values of 24 and 29.5–30.5 °C reported in the literature.
`In the present work, the MP of oleic acid was determined
`to be around 12.8 °C. Literature values for the MP of oleic
`acid given in the literature varies in the range of 10–16 °C,
`probably due to different crystalline modifications, although
`one paper [33] reports 5 °C as the MP for oleic acid as
`determined by DSC, a result not in agreement with the
`present work or with other investigations reported in the
`literature. For the common ester methyl stearate, a MP of
`37.7 °C (Table 4) was found, a value that generally agreed
`well with MP data given in the literature (37–39.1 °C).
`Another work [18] provides MP for various oleate
`esters. In that reference, the peak melting temperature of
`methyl oleate is reported as -17.3 °C, which is several °C
`higher than the value reported here. The lowest melting
`reported was for isopropyl oleate around -33 °C. In con-
`trast, analysis of DSC cooling curves for methyl oleate
`yielded crystallization onset
`(freezing point)
`tempera-
`tures = -17.5 °C [34] and -19.8 °C [35], values compa-
`rable to those in Tables 2 and 5.
`Another study [36] reported MP data for several pure
`FAME measured by an automated ‘‘mini-cloud point’’ test
`
`123
`
`Table 7 Melting points of some triacylglycerols determined in the
`present work (quadruplicate determinations; standard deviations in
`parentheses)
`
`Chain
`
`Saturates
`
`Melting point (°C)
`
`8:0
`
`9:0
`
`10:0
`
`11:0
`
`12:0
`
`13:0
`
`14:0
`
`15:0
`
`16:0
`
`17:0
`
`18:0
`
`19:0
`
`20:0
`
`21:0
`
`22:0
`
`23:0
`
`9.44 (0.14)
`
`9.46 (0.09)
`
`30.37 (0.24)
`
`27.98 (0.84)
`
`46.29 (0.04)
`
`44.60 (0.25)
`
`57.35 (0.19)
`
`55.46 (0.05)
`
`65.45 (0.27)
`
`64.11 (0.06)
`
`72.67 (0.32)
`
`71.31 (0.29)
`
`77.67 (0.12)
`
`76.36 (0.43)
`
`82.50 (0.08)
`
`81.85 (0.22)
`
`Unsaturates
`16:1 D9c
`
`18:1 D6c
`18:1 D9c
`18:1 D11c
`18:2 D9c, D12c
`19:1 D10c
`20:1 D11c
`21:1 D12c
`22:1 D13c
`24:1 D15c
`
`-22.75; 25.68, -21.81; -27.75, -21.88 (two
`peaks)
`
`26.24 (0.06)
`
`3.98 (0.59)
`
`1.04 (0.08)
`
`-12.70 (0.35)
`
`26.12 (0.05)
`
`10.11 (0.10), 17.80 (0.14)
`
`37.97 (0.08)
`
`29.78 (0.23)
`
`41.43 (0.09)
`
`apparatus. Although this experimental procedure is better
`characterized as analysis of crystallization onset tempera-
`tures, data reported as MP for methyl myristate (17 °C) and
`stearate (37 °C) were within 1–2 °C of results reported in
`the present work. An earlier work [37] analyzed and
`reported Tonset and Tpeak from DSC heating scans per-
`formed on methyl palmitate, stearate and oleate. Onset
`temperatures were 1.8–2.1 °C lower than measured peak
`maxima for these esters. Taking the MP at peak maximum
`temperature resulted in values for methyl palmitate, stea-
`rate and oleate (29.9, 39.0, -18.9 °C) that agreed well with
`results shown in Table 4.
`
`Saturated Unbranched Fatty Acid Chains
`
`The data in Table 1 for saturated fatty acids confirm
`previous observations [9, 12] regarding alternating MP,
`
`Purdue 2014
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

`

`J Am Oil Chem Soc (2009) 86:843–856
`
`853
`
` Acid
` Methyl ester
`
`75
`70
`65
`60
`55
`50
`45
`40
`35
`30
`25
`20
`15
`10
`
`05
`
`-5
`-10
`-15
`
`Melting Point (oC)
`
`22
`21
`20
`19
`18
`17
`16
`15
`14
`13
`12
`Number of carbon atoms in the fatty acid chain (incl. branching)
`
`Fig. 5 Melting points (Tpeak) of iso acids and their methyl esters. The
`number of carbon atoms includes those in the methyl branches
`
`decreasing with the number of carbons in the ester moiety.
`In this case, the esters of odd-numbered fatty acids show
`only minor differences, often less than 1 °C, to those of the
`preceding even-numbered fatty esters. Furthermore,
`the
`MP differences between acids their corresponding esters
`decrease with increasing chain length.
`
`Unsaturated Fatty Acid Chains
`
`The introduction of one cis double bond in a fatty acid
`chain reduces the MP considerably compared to the satu-
`rated chain with the same number of carbon atoms. A trans
`double bond has comparatively little effect on the MP
`compared to the saturated chain with the same number of
`carbon atoms. This is a result of a cis double bond intro-
`ducing a bend in the hydrocarbon chain while in the case of
`a trans double bond, the chain is propagated in a fashion
`close to that of the corresponding saturated species. This
`structural similarity of chains with trans double bonds to
`fully saturated chains is also expressed in other physical
`properties, such as viscosity [38].
`The cis x-9 fatty acids in the range of C18–C24 show MP
`alternation reversed in comparison to the saturated fatty
`acid chains. For these fatty acids, the even-numbered cis
`x-9 fatty acid possesses a slightly lower MP (or only slightly
`higher, see C20 vs. C19) than the preceding odd-numbered
`fatty acid or the increase is very small (Table 5; Fig. 4).
`Another reversal is the strong alternation observed for the
`cis x-9 methyl and ethyl esters in comparison to the acids.
`This effect is also shown by the difference in MP between
`the acids and the corresponding methyl esters. For the cis
`x-9 chains with an even number of carbons, the difference
`in MP between the acid and the corresponding me

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket