throbber
6/28/2018
`
`Purdue Pharma Statement on Abuse and Diversion of OxyContin®
`
`http://www.purduepharma.com:80/pressroom/news/oxycontinNews/160_Statem
`
`Go
`
`2 captures
`21 Oct 2002 - 17 Feb 2003
`
`SEP OCT FEB
`21
`2001 2002 2003
`
`👤 ⍰ ❎
`
`
`f 🐦
`
`▾ About this capture
`
`
`
`Prescribing Information
`
`For Immediate Release
`
`Contact: James W. Heins/Purdue Pharma /203-588-8069
`Statement Regarding Suspension of 160 mg OxyContin®
`Tablets
`
`
`
`Stamford, CT – May 11, 2001 - Purdue Pharma introduced the 160 mg strength
`OxyContin® tablets to help patients suffering from the most severe, persistent pain.
`However, recent media attention has made more people aware of the abuse potential
`of opioid analgesics. Even though there have been few reports of diversion of the
`160 mg tablets, Purdue is concerned about the possibility of illicit use of tablets of
`such high strength.
`
`
`Therefore, we have decided to temporarily suspend shipment of the 160 mg tablets –
`at least until we have studied this issue further. This is voluntary action on Purdue’s
`part. While we regret that our action may burden some patients, we believe strongly
`that on balance our action is the right thing to do.
`
`
`Purdue is working to ensure that patients with legitimate medical need continue to
`have access to OxyContin® tablets, and we remain committed to helping educate the
`medical community about its appropriate use.
`
`
`Purdue Letter to Healthcare Professionals
`OxyContin® Package Insert
`
`
`
`https://web.archive.org/web/20021021055206/http://www.purduepharma.com:80/pressroom/news/oxycontinNews/160_Statement.asp
`
`1/1
`
`Purdue 2013
`Collegium v. Purdue, PGR2018-00048
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket