throbber
2705–2716
`Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 11
`DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg393
`
`Structural variations and stabilising modifications of
`synthetic siRNAs in mammalian cells
`
`Frank Czauderna, Melanie Fechtner, Sibylle Dames, Hu¨ seyin Aygu¨ n1, Anke Klippel,
`Gijsbertus J. Pronk, Klaus Giese and Jo¨ rg Kaufmann*
`
`Atugen AG, Otto Warburg Haus (No. 80), Robert-Roessle-Strasse 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany and 1BioSpring,
`Hanauer Landstrasse 526, 60386 Frankfurt, Germany
`
`Received March 20, 2003; Revised and Accepted April 11, 2003
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`interfering RNAs (siRNA)
`Double-stranded short
`induce post-transcriptional silencing in a variety of
`biological systems. In the present study we have
`investigated the structural requirements of chemic-
`ally synthesised siRNAs to mediate efficient gene
`silencing in mammalian cells. In contrast to studies
`with Drosophila extracts, we found that synthetic,
`double-stranded siRNAs without specific nucleotide
`overhangs are highly efficient in gene silencing.
`Blocking of the 5¢-hydroxyl terminus of the anti-
`sense strand leads to a dramatic loss of RNA inter-
`ference activity, whereas blocking of the 3¢ terminus
`or blocking of the termini of the sense strand had
`no negative effect. We further demonstrate that syn-
`thetic siRNA molecules with internal 2¢-O-methyl
`modification, but not molecules with terminal modi-
`fications, are protected against serum-derived
`nucleases. Finally, we analysed different sets of
`siRNA molecules with various 2¢-O-methyl modifica-
`tions for stability and activity. We demonstrate that
`2¢-O-methyl modifications at specific positions in
`the molecule improve stability of siRNAs in serum
`and are tolerated without significant loss of RNA
`interference activity. These second generation
`siRNAs will be better suited for potential therapeutic
`application of synthetic siRNAs in vivo.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The term RNA-mediated interference (RNAi) was initially
`introduced by Fire and co-workers (1)
`to describe the
`observation that injection of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)
`into the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans can block expres-
`sion of genes highly homologous in sequence to the delivered
`dsRNA. RNAi is evolutionarily conserved among eukaryotes
`and it appears to have an essential role in protecting the
`genome against invasion by pathogens such as viruses, which
`generate dsRNA molecules upon activation and replication
`(2). Most recently two independent studies demonstrated that
`the yeast RNAi machinery is required for the formation and
`
`maintenance of heterochromatin during mitosis and meiosis,
`indicating additional functions for RNAi (3,4). In the past,
`repression of genes by long dsRNAs has been less successful
`in mammalian cells with the exception of embryonic cells
`(5,6). Use of short (<30 nt) synthetic dsRNAs allowed for
`sequence-specific gene silencing yet avoided the non-selective
`toxic effects of long dsRNAs in differentiated mammalian
`cells (7). This discovery triggered a much wider interest in the
`RNAi phenomenon since it provides a new avenue for loss of
`function studies in somatic cells of vertebrates. Initial studies
`with these small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) demonstrated
`that the duplex must have 2 or 3 nt overhanging 3¢ ends for
`efficient cleavage destruction of the target mRNA (8). The 3¢
`overhangs can be generated by cleavage of long dsRNA into
`siRNAs by a multidomain RNase III-like enzyme, known as
`Dicer (9). In a subsequent step the siRNA associates with the
`RNAi-induced silencing complex (RISC), which is then
`guided to catalyse the sequence-specific degradation of the
`mRNA (9–11).
`RNAi induced by synthetic siRNAs is transient, and in
`mammalian cell culture systems re-expression of the target
`mRNA usually occurs after a few days (12,13). Therefore an
`improvement in the intracellular and extracellular stability of
`the effector molecules will be one crucial aspect for the
`successful in vivo application of synthetic siRNAs. A variety
`of chemical modifications, including terminal and internal
`modifications (e.g. 2¢-O-modification or phosphorothioate
`linkages), have been tested to see whether they influence
`RNAi inducing activity (7,8,13–15). However, these studies
`did not adequately assess the effect of the different modifi-
`cations on sensitivity of these molecules to siRNA-degrading
`serum-derived nucleases.
`In the present work we define the minimal structural
`requirements of siRNAs in mammalian cells and test a series
`of chemical modifications to improve the stability of siRNAs
`for future in vivo applications. To determine differences in
`potency, we measured the inhibition of expression of several
`targets, including PTEN, p110b and Akt1, which are all
`members of the phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase pathway
`(16,17). Surprisingly, we found no overhang dependence of
`the siRNA duplexes in HeLa cells, which is in contrast to
`observations made in the Drosophila system (15). We have
`established the minimal required size for functional siRNAs in
`HeLa cells and have developed functionally active siRNA
`
`*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 30 9489 2833; Fax: +49 30 9489 2801; Email: kaufmann@atugen.com
`
`Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 31 No. 11 ª Oxford University Press 2003; all rights reserved
`
`Alnylam Exh. 1028
`
`

`

`2706 Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 11
`
`molecules with increased nuclease resistance. Our results
`provide a basis for the further development of synthetic siRNA
`molecules with improved characteristics, including higher
`resistance to serum-derived endonucleases.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Synthetic siRNAs and GeneBlocs
`
`Synthetic siRNAs were purchased from BioSpring (Frankfurt,
`Germany). The oligoribonucleotides were resuspended in
`RNase-free TE to a final concentration of 50 mM. In the case of
`bimolecular siRNA molecules, equal aliquots (100 mM) were
`combined to a final concentration of 50 mM. For the formation
`of duplexes the siRNAs were incubated at 50(cid:176)C for 2 min in
`annealing buffer (25 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2) and were
`cooled down to room temperature. The PTEN-specific
`GeneBlocs
`used
`have
`the
`schematic
`structure
`cap-
`nnnnnnNNNNNNNNnnnnnn-cap, as published previously
`(16), where cap represents an inverted deoxy abasic modifi-
`cation, n stands for 2¢-O-methyl ribonucleotides (A, G, U or C)
`and N represents phosphorothioate-linked deoxyribonucleo-
`tides (A, G, T or C).
`
`Cell culture and transfections
`
`line used in the experiments
`The particular HeLa cell
`presented was a gift
`from M. Gossen (MDC, Berlin,
`Germany) and was grown in Eagle’s minimum essential
`medium with 2 mM L-glutamine, Earle’s balanced salt
`solution, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM non-essential
`amino acids and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Synthetic
`siRNA and antisense GeneBloc transfections were carried out
`in 96-well or 10 cm plates (at 30–50% confluency) by using
`cationic lipids such as Oligofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
`CA) or NC388 (Atugen, Berlin, Germany) as reported
`previously (16). HeLa cells were transfected by adding a
`pre-formed 53 concentrated complex of siRNAs and lipid in
`serum-free medium to cells in complete medium. The total
`transfection volume was 100 ml for cells plated in 96-wells and
`10 ml for cells in 10 cm plates. The final lipid concentration
`was 0.8–1.2 mg/ml depending on cell density; the siRNA
`concentration is indicated in each experiment.
`
`Antibodies and immunoblotting
`
`Cell lysates were prepared and aliquots of the cell extracts
`containing equal amounts of protein were analysed by
`immunoblotting as described previously (16,17). The murine
`monoclonal anti-p110a antibody has been described (18).
`Rabbit polyclonal anti-Akt and anti-phospho-Akt
`(S473)
`antibodies were obtained from Cell Signalling Technology.
`The murine monoclonal anti-PTEN antibody was from Santa
`Cruz Biotechnology.
`
`Quantitation of mRNA by Taqman analysis
`
`The RNA of cells transfected in 96-wells was isolated and
`purified using the Invisorb RNA HTS 96 kit (InVitek GmbH,
`Berlin, Germany). Inhibition of targeted mRNA expression
`was detected by real time RT–PCR (Taqman) analysis using
`300 nM 5¢ forward primer, 300 nM 3¢ reverse primer and
`100 nM Fam-Tamra-labelled Taqman probe. The gene-
`specific primer sequences can be obtained on request. The
`
`reaction was carried out in 50 ml and assayed in an ABI
`PRISM 7700 Sequence detector (Applied Biosystems) accord-
`ing to the manufacturer’s instructions under the following
`conditions: 48(cid:176)C for 30 min, 95(cid:176)C for 10 min, followed by
`40 cycles of 15 s at 95(cid:176)C and 1 min at 60(cid:176)C.
`
`Nuclease resistance assay
`For the stability assay 5 ml of (2.5 mM) siRNA was incubated
`in 50 ml of fetal bovine serum for 15 or 120 min at 37(cid:176)C. The
`solution was extracted with phenol and siRNA was precipi-
`tated with ethanol and separated on 10% polyacrylamide gels
`followed by ethidium bromide staining. Equal amounts of
`siRNA before serum incubation (0 min) was extracted with
`phenol in parallel and loaded as an input control.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Comparison of synthetic siRNAs and antisense molecules
`in HeLa cells
`
`As most published studies with siRNA in mammalian cells
`have involved the knock-down of ectopically or abundantly
`expressed genes, we first set out to demonstrate that synthetic
`siRNAs can be efficient tools in reducing endogenous mRNA
`and protein levels. For this purpose we designed and analysed
`siRNA molecules specific for the tumour suppressor PTEN.
`For comparison and as a positive knock-down control, we
`employed in parallel conventional antisense molecules
`containing the same nucleotide sequences. The antisense
`molecules, here called GeneBlocs, consisted of nine internal
`deoxyribonucleotides for activation of RNase H flanked by six
`2¢-O-methyl-modified ribonucleotides, whereas the siRNAs
`used consisted of
`two 21mer
`ribonucleotides with two
`deoxythymidine nucleotides at the 3¢ termini (Fig. 1A). The
`double-stranded siRNA as well as
`the single-stranded
`GeneBlocs are identical in length (21mer + terminal modifi-
`cations). To control for non-specific transfection effects, we
`included mismatch sequences as negative controls. HeLa cells
`were transfected with increasing amounts of these molecules
`and the PTEN mRNA level was analysed 24 h later by real
`time PCR (Taqman). The maximal reduction of PTEN mRNA
`normalised to the mRNA of p110a, one of the catalytic
`subunits of PI 3-kinase, was reached with 2.2 nM siRNA and
`20 nM GeneBloc (Fig. 1B). To verify the result on the mRNA
`level, we analysed protein reduction induced by antisense
`GeneBloc and siRNA transfection in a second set of experi-
`ments. HeLa cells were transfected with increasing amounts of
`these molecules and cell lysates were analysed 48 h later by
`immunoblot analysis using PTEN-specific antibodies. p110a
`protein level served as a loading control (Fig. 1C). Maximal
`PTEN protein knock-down was detected with 2.5 nM
`siRNA and 15 nM GeneBloc. These experiments demonstrate
`that siRNA molecules can efficiently reduce mRNA and
`protein levels of endogenous genes. Furthermore,
`these
`siRNAs
`can be more
`efficient
`in mediating mRNA
`reduction when compared to conventional antisense molecules
`directed against
`the same target sequence. The observed
`differences in efficacy may be due to different mechanisms
`of target recognition and/or degradation and may reflect
`the involvement of more efficient catalytic steps in the case
`of RNAi.
`
`

`

`fTBNlA
`PTBNlB
`
`PTBNl»t-!
`PTBNl.a-M
`
`S'
`cquua9cagaaacaaaa9ga9-TT
`3 ' TT-goaaucc;rueuuuguuuucouo
`•
`•
`•
`•
`S '
`oqu.9a;oaoaaa9aaaau9a9-TT
`3 ' TT-gcacuoquguuucuuuuacuc
`
`A
`
`C
`
`PRN GB
`
`PTBN GBl'9-i
`
`S'
`
`S'
`
`iB-ouoouuTTGTTTCTGouaaog- iB
`•
`
`iB-cucauuTTCTTTGTGoucaeq-iB
`
`•
`
`• •
`
`Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 11
`
`2707
`
`B
`
`~
`
`!:!
`0
`~ 1.2
`<I.
`1
`z 0.8
`w
`~ 0,6
`a.
`.. 0,2
`0 ., 0,4
`a:
`
`0
`
`~
`- 1
`~ 1,2
`~
`<I.
`z 0,8
`w
`~
`0,6
`Q.
`., .. 0,2
`0
`0,4
`a:
`
`0
`
`35nM
`8.75nM
`Q 2,2nM
`a 0,55nM
`(cid:127) 0,13nM
`(cid:127) 003nM
`
`O 40nM
`(cid:143) 20nM
`1onM
`llil 5nM
`
`slRNA
`
`UT
`
`PTEN
`1AB
`
`PTEN
`1ABMM
`
`GeneBloc
`
`UT
`
`PTEN
`GB
`
`PTEN
`GBMM
`
`GeneBloc
`
`siRNA
`
`UT 0,9 3.7 15 60 0.15 0.6 2.5 10 nM
`
`- -----------
`
`p110c,
`
`PTEN - __ _
`
`1 2
`
`3 4
`
`5 6 7 8 9
`
`Figure 1. mRNA and protein knock-down of endogenous PTEN and induced by transfection of siRNA or GeneBloc (GB, antisense) in HeLa cells. (A) The
`sense (A) and antisense (B) strands of siRNA targeting human PTEN mRNA are shown in comparison to the corresponding GeneBloc (antisense molecules).
`siRNAs were synthesised with 2 nt deoxythymidine (TT) 3¢ overhangs. GeneBlocs representing the third generation of antisense oligonucleotides with
`inverted abasic (iB) end modifications (see Materials and Methods). The sequences of the respective mismatch controls (MM) containing 4 nt changes are
`shown. (B) Reduction of PTEN mRNA expression in siRNA- and GeneBloc-transfected HeLa cells. HeLa cells were transfected with the indicated amounts
`of siRNA and GeneBloc as described. After 24 h, RNA was prepared and subjected to real time RT–PCR (Taqman) analysis to determine PTEN mRNA
`levels relative to p110a mRNA levels. Each bar represents triplicate transfections (6 SD). (C) Inhibition of PTEN protein expression analysed by
`immunoblot. The cells were harvested 48 h after transfection of the indicated amounts of GeneBlocs or siRNAs. Cell lysates were separated by SDS–PAGE
`and analysed by immunoblotting using anti-PTEN and anti-p110a antibody. The amount of p110a, a catalytic subunit of PI 3-kinase, was used as a loading
`control. Control cell extract from untransfected HeLa cells (UT) were loaded in the left lane.
`
`No overhang requirements of siRNA duplexes in
`mammalian cells
`
`Duplex length requirements of siRNA duplexes in
`mammalian cells
`
`The structural–functional relationship of siRNAs has been
`extensively studied biochemically using Drosophila melano-
`gaster embryo lysates (7,15). Using this system it has been
`demonstrated that duplexes with 2 nt 3¢ overhangs were the
`most efficient triggers of mRNA degradation (8,15,19). To test
`whether a similar dependence is true for mammalian cells, we
`transfected PTEN siRNA molecules with 3¢ or 5¢ overhangs or
`without overhangs into HeLa cells. Surprisingly, we did not
`observe a more efficient knock-down of target RNA with
`siRNAs containing 3¢ overhangs when compared to blunt
`molecules or those with 5¢ overhangs (Fig. 2A). Similar results
`were obtained for the second target p110b (Fig. 2C). To verify
`the observed mRNA knock-down, we performed an immuno-
`blot analysis using PTEN-specific antibodies (Fig. 2B). In
`these experiments the reduction of PTEN protein expression
`as well as the downstream phosphorylation of Akt1 kinase, a
`consequence of PTEN protein inhibition (16,17), was very
`similar with the different siRNA duplexes. We concluded
`from these data that 3¢ overhangs on synthetic siRNAs are not
`essential for RNAi in HeLa cells.
`
`We next examined the effects of duplex length variations on
`siRNA activity. For these experiments we used the Akt1
`kinase as a target. Duplexes of 19 nt length were highly
`efficient in reducing Akt1 mRNA levels independent of the
`nature (deoxyribonucleotides or ribonucleotides) of the 3¢
`overhang (Fig. 3A, compare molecules 1AB, 2AB, 3AB and
`4AB). This result is consistent with our observation that a 3¢
`overhang appears not to be crucial for siRNA function in HeLa
`cells. Next we reduced the duplex length to 17 nt (Fig. 3A,
`molecule 5AB). This molecule did show a dramatically
`reduced silencing activity, suggesting that active siRNA
`duplexes must have a minimal length (~19 nt), which is in
`agreement with experiments assessing activity of siRNA
`molecules with different duplex lengths in Drosophila extracts
`(15). This minimal duplex length for active siRNA molecules
`might be explained mechanistically by two different require-
`ments. First, a minimal base pairing between the antisense
`siRNA and the target mRNA may be obligatory or, second,
`incorporation into the RISC requires a minimal length of the
`siRNA duplex. To address this question we synthesised and
`
`(cid:143)
`(cid:143)
`(cid:143)
`

`

`2708 Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 11
`
`A
`
`B
`
`C
`
`Ratio PTEN/p11 Oc,;
`
`0
`
`"'
`
`025nM
`D5nM
`D1nM
`(cid:127) 0.2nM
`
`PTENlA
`PTENlB
`
`PTEN1.AMM
`PTENlBMM
`
`PTEN2A
`PTEN2B
`
`PTEN2AMM
`PTEN2BMM
`
`PT&N3A
`PTEN3B
`
`PTEN3l\MM
`PTEN3BMM
`
`s·
`cguuagcagaaacaaaaggag- TT
`3' TT-gcaaucgucuuuguuuuccuc
`•
`•
`•
`•
`s·
`cgu9a9cacaaa9aaaaugag- TT
`3 · TT-gcacuoguguuucuuuuacuc
`
`s·
`3'
`s·
`3•
`
`eguuagcagaaacaaaaggag
`9caauc9ucuuuguuuuccuc
`•
`•
`•
`•
`egugagoaoaaagaaaaugag
`gcacucguguuucuuuuacuc
`s· TT-oguu.agcagaaac:.aaaaggag
`9caaucgucuuuquuuuccuc• TT
`3·
`s·
`3'
`
`T
`"'
`T
`T
`TT-cgugagcacaaagaaaaugag
`geacucguguuueuuuuacuc- TT
`
`UT
`
`1AB
`
`1AB 2AB 2AB 3AB 3AB GB GB
`MM
`MM
`MM
`MM
`
`p1 10c,; - - - - - ---- -
`PTEN - --
`-
`-
`-
`P*-Akt - - - - - -
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Ratio p110~ / p110c,;
`-,,.
`-...,
`(I) ~ -...,
`0
`0
`0
`
`0
`(l)
`
`0
`
`pllOPlA
`p11op10
`
`pllOPlAMM
`pllOPlBMM
`
`p110P2A
`pllOP2B
`
`pllOP3A
`p110P3B
`
`s ·
`uggaaugaaooacuggaauuu•TT
`3 · TT-accuuacuuggugaccuuaaa
`• • • ••
`•
`s·
`ugguaucaagcucaggaauau-TT
`3' TT-aceauag,.iucgaquccuuaua
`s ·
`3 '
`
`uggaaugaaccacuggaauuu
`accuuacuuggugaccuuaaa
`
`s·
`3 '
`
`TT-u99aau9aaccacu99aauuu
`accuuacuuggugaccuuaaa-TT
`
`UT
`
`0 1onM
`•1nM
`
`Figure 2. siRNA duplexes with a 3¢ or 5¢ overhang or without overhang (blunt) are equally potent in mediating gene silencing in HeLa cells. (A) Inhibition
`of PTEN mRNA expression in HeLa cells transfected with the indicated amounts of siRNA molecules. The sequences and different terminal structures of the
`siRNAs molecules are shown on the left. Mutations in the mismatch molecules are indicated by arrowheads. Samples were analysed in parallel for the level
`of PTEN mRNA expression 24 h after transfection by real time RT–PCR (Taqman) analysis. PTEN mRNA levels are shown relative to the mRNA levels of
`p110a, which served as internal reference. Each bar represents triplicate transfections (6 SD). (B) Inhibition of PTEN protein expression by use of siRNAs
`with different terminal structures. The cells were harvested 48 h after transfection of the indicated siRNAs (30 nM) (lanes 2–7) or GeneBlocs (30 nM) (lanes
`8 and 9). Cell extracts were separated by SDS–PAGE and analysed by immunoblotting using anti-p110a, anti-PTEN or anti-phospho-Akt antibody. The
`amount of p110a was used as a loading control and control cell extracts from untransfected HeLa cells (UT) were loaded in lane 1. (C) Inhibition of p110b
`mRNA expression in HeLa cells transfected with the indicated amounts of siRNA molecules. p110b mRNA levels are shown relative to the mRNA levels of
`p110a, which served as internal reference. The ratio of p110b/p110a mRNA of untransfected HeLa cells is shown at the bottom (UT). Each bar represents
`triplicate transfections (6 SD).
`
`transfected 19 nt long siRNA duplex molecules with one and
`two terminal mutations (CG and UA inversion) relative to the
`wild-type sequence (Fig. 3A, molecules 6AB and 7AB). Both
`
`molecules, even the molecule with a stretch of only 15 nt base
`pairing to the target mRNA, were functional in reducing the
`Akt1 mRNA level. We concluded from this result that the
`
`

`

`Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 11
`
`2709
`
`A
`
`Aktl lA
`Aktl 1B
`
`Aktl 2A
`Aktl 2B
`
`Aktl 3A
`Akt l 3B
`
`Aktl 4A
`Aktl 4B
`
`Akt l SA
`Aktl SB
`
`Ak tl 6A
`Aktl 6B
`
`Aktl 7A
`Aktl 7B
`
`PTBN lA
`P'l'EN 18
`
`P1'ENA
`P'l.'ENB
`
`P'l.'E>Mil
`PTE>M<l
`
`PTENl<H2
`P'l.'ENIK!
`
`B
`
`s ·
`cgaggggaguacaucaaga- uu
`3· uu-gcuccccucaugu.aguucu
`s·
`cgaggggaguacaucaaga-cc
`3 · uu-gcuccecuoauguaguuou
`s·
`ogaggggaguacauoaaga- CC
`3 · TT-9cuccccucauguaguucu
`s·
`ogaggggaguaoauoaaga- TT
`3 · TT- gcuccccucaugu.aguucu
`s·
`9a9999~gu.aeauca$g- •c
`3 • ug- cuccccucauguaguuc
`•
`•
`s·
`990.ggggogua.coucoogu- TT
`3 • TT- ccuccccucauguaguuca
`••
`••
`s·
`9ca999gaguaeoucaacu- TT
`3 · TT-cguocccucaugu.aguuga
`s ·
`cguuagcagaaacaaaaggag-TT
`3 · TT-gca.aucgucuuuguuuuoeuo
`
`Ratio Akt1 / p110a
`0
`
`0 ~ ~ -
`...
`- "' ;,.
`
`0 "
`
`-·m
`
`D25nM
`(cid:143) 5nM
`(cid:127) 1nM
`
`Duplex length
`
`19mer
`
`19mer
`
`19mer
`
`19mer
`
`17mer
`
`19mer(2MM)
`
`19mer(4MM)
`
`21mer
`
`UT
`
`S ' guuagcagaaacaaaagga
`3'caauc9ueuuu9uuuuoeu
`•
`S ' guuagcagaaagaaaagga
`3'caaucgucuuucuuuuccu
`• •
`S'guuageacaaagaaaagga
`3 ' caauoguguuucuuuuccu
`• •
`•
`S' guuaecaeaaagaaaagga
`3 ' caaugguguuucuuuuccu
`• • • •
`5 ' guuaccacaaagaauagga
`3 ' caaugguguuucuuauccu
`
`UT
`
`Ratio PTEN/p110a
`
`C
`
`D40nM
`o 20nM
`Cl 10nM
`D SnM
`
`p110a-
`
`PTEN -
`
`p110a-
`
`PTEN -
`
`PTEN PTEN
`MM1
`
`48 h -
`-
`
`96 h
`
`Figure 3. Duplex length requirement and tolerance for mutation in siRNAs in HeLa cells. (A) Inhibition of Akt1 mRNA expression in HeLa cells transfected
`with the indicated amounts of siRNA molecules. The sequences, lengths and different terminal structures (3¢ deoxyribonucleotides in upper case letters) of the
`siRNA molecules are shown on the left. The nucleotide changes in the mismatch siRNA molecule are indicated by arrowheads. Samples were analysed in
`parallel for the level of Akt1 and p110a mRNA expression 24 h after transfection by real time RT–PCR (Taqman) analysis. The mRNA levels of p110a served
`as internal reference. Each bar represents triplicate transfections (6 SD). (B) Inhibition of PTEN mRNA expression in HeLa cells transfected with the indi-
`cated amounts of siRNA molecules. The sequences of the corresponding siRNA molecules are shown on the left. (C) Inhibition of PTEN protein expression
`analysed by immunoblot. The cells were harvested 48 or 96 h after transfection of the indicated siRNAs (30 nM). Cell extracts were separated by SDS–PAGE
`and analysed by immunoblotting as described previously. The positions of PTEN and p110a, which was used as a loading control, are indicated on the left.
`
`duplex length itself, but not the base pairing of the antisense
`siRNA with the target mRNA, seems to determine the minimal
`length of functional siRNAs. These data suggest that the
`length of the double-stranded helix is an important determin-
`ant for incorporation into the RISC complex. Since the
`introduced mismatches at the terminal ends of the siRNA
`duplexes had little effect on RNAi, we wanted to analyse the
`effect of mismatches located in the centre of the molecule
`(Fig. 3B). For these experiments we used 19 nt long blunt
`siRNAs directed against PTEN mRNA. The sequence changes
`
`in one siRNA strand were compensated by complementary
`changes in the other strand to avoid disrupting duplex
`formation. A siRNA with only one point mutation in the
`centre of the molecule was severely compromised in its ability
`to reduce mRNA and protein expression levels (Fig. 3B and
`C). This result indicates that the RNAi machinery is highly
`discriminative between perfect and imperfect base pairing
`between target mRNA and siRNA in the centre of the duplex.
`The dependence on a perfect complementarity between target
`and siRNA has been investigated for RNAi before (13–15,19).
`
`

`

`2710 Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 11
`
`Effects on RNAi and siRNA stability of 5¢ and 3¢
`terminal modifications
`
`Having established the minimal structural requirements of
`siRNA duplexes, we wanted to test whether chemical end
`modifications can lead to more stabilised, active siRNA
`molecules. As a starting point we have used an inverted deoxy
`abasic (iB) modification (for details and structure see 16) and
`an amino end modification (NH2) (amino group with 6-carbon
`linker at the terminal phosphate; for details see 20). Similar
`end modifications have been successfully used to stabilise
`conventional antisense molecules and ribozymes (21) and are
`generally considered to protect
`therapeutic nucleic acids
`against serum-derived exonuclease activities (22). RNAi
`induction by siRNA duplexes with an NH2 or iB modification
`was dramatically reduced when all four termini were modified
`(Fig. 4A, compare molecule 1AB with 4AB and 5A5B).
`However, siRNA molecules which were modified only at the
`terminus of the sense strand showed no reduction in gene
`silencing activity (Fig. 4A, molecule 2B4A). Even siRNA
`molecules, which had no end protection at the 5¢-end of the
`antisense strand but on all other termini, showed no reduction
`in RNAi activity (Fig. 4A, molecules 6B4A and 7B4A). This
`result is in agreement with recently published results demon-
`strating the importance of the 5¢-hydroxyl group of the
`antisense strand for RNAi (20,23). In order to test whether the
`terminal modifications were capable of increasing stability in
`serum, we incubated the different siRNA duplexes at 37(cid:176)C in
`calf serum, followed by separation on 10% polyacrylamide
`gels. Surprisingly we were not able to detect any increase in
`stability or nuclease resistance (Fig. 4B). Neither the NH2 nor
`the iB end modification stabilised the siRNA duplexes
`significantly. This result suggests that siRNA molecules are
`degraded predominantly by serum-derived endonucleases. To
`test this hypothesis we synthesised siRNA duplex containing
`internal 2¢-O-methyl ribonucleotides at all positions, a com-
`monly used modification to increase stability of RNA-
`containing molecules (24). This internally modified molecule
`showed extreme resistance against degradation in our serum
`incubation assay (Fig. 4B, siRNA molecule at the bottom), and
`therefore might have better pharmacodynamic properties
`in vivo.
`
`Synthetic siRNA molecules with specific internal 2¢-O-
`methyl modification mediate RNAi and have increased
`stability in serum
`
`To identify synthetic siRNA molecules which have increased
`stability, but are also able to efficiently induce RNAi, we
`tested a series of molecules with 2¢-O-methyl residues at
`different positions (Fig. 5). siRNA molecules with either one
`or both strands consisting of 2¢-O-methyl residues were not
`able to induce RNAi in our mammalian system (Fig. 5A,
`molecules V2, V5 and V6). Similar results were observed with
`2¢-O-methyl-modified siRNAs in Drosophila lysates employ-
`ing a luciferase-based RNAi assay (15). However,
`the
`decrease in activity was less pronounced when only parts of
`the strands were modified. This result is in agreement with a
`recent study employing siRNAs, which were not modified in
`the core but contained different internal modifications at the
`terminal nucleotides of both strands (14). Interestingly, a
`molecule with an unmodified antisense strand (lower) and a
`
`completely modified sense strand was significantly more
`active when compared to the reversed version (Fig. 5A,
`compare molecules V5 and V6). This result suggests again
`that the antisense strand of the siRNA seems to be more
`critical and sensitive to modification. The most efficient
`molecules in reducing PTEN mRNA had only stretches of
`modification leaving the 5¢-end unmodified or were modified
`on alternating positions on both strands (Fig. 5A, molecules
`V10 and V12). At this point it was crucial to analyse the
`stability and activity of partially 2¢-O-methyl-modified siRNA
`molecules in more detail. To demonstrate nuclease resistance
`we incubated the different siRNA versions in serum followed
`by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. As shown before,
`blunt-ended siRNA molecules with unmodified ribonucleo-
`tides were very rapidly degraded whereas a complete substi-
`tution with 2¢-O-methyl nucleotides mediated resistance
`against serum-derived nucleases (Fig. 5B, compare molecule
`AB with V1). siRNA molecules with partial 2¢-O-methyl
`modification also showed an increased stability when com-
`pared to unmodified siRNAs. Especially, molecules with
`alternating modifications on both strands showed a significant
`improvement in stability (Fig. 5B, molecules V13, V14, V15
`and V12). More importantly, transfection of three of these
`molecules into HeLa cells did result in a significant down-
`regulation of PTEN protein expression (Fig. 5C, lanes 6, 9 and
`10). Detection of p110a protein by immunoblot was used as a
`loading control. In this RNAi activity assay we observed an
`unexpected preference for molecules which were modified at
`every second nucleotide beginning with the most 5¢ terminal
`nucleotide of the antisense strand (molecules V15 and V12).
`Molecules which contained modifications beginning with the
`second nucleotide at the 5¢ end of the antisense strand were
`more stable but had a strongly reduced activity in gene
`silencing (molecules V13 and V14). This result points towards
`highly specific interactions between the involved enzymes and
`precise nucleotides in the siRNA duplex. Taken together our
`data demonstrate that 2¢-O-methyl modifications at particu-
`larly selected positions in the siRNA duplex can increase
`nuclease resistance and do not necessarily abolish RNAi
`completely.
`An increased stability of synthetic siRNAs should primarily
`have implications for in vivo application, e.g. mouse models or
`in therapeutic applications of siRNA. Nevertheless we wanted
`to analyse whether the introduced modification can also lead
`to an extended protein knock-down in cell culture systems. In
`order to demonstrate this effect, we transfected HeLa cells
`transiently for 6 h using our cationic lipids with different
`versions of PTEN-specific siRNAs. The lipid siRNA complex
`was then washed away and the PTEN protein knock-down was
`analysed 48 and 120 h later. Generally knock-down experi-
`ments without continuous transfection of siRNAs are compli-
`cated due to rapid growth of untransfected cells in this time
`period resulting in a very transient knock-down (13).
`However, here we were able to demonstrate a prolonged
`PTEN protein knock-down with siRNA molecules stabilised
`by the described 2¢-O-methyl modifications. At 48 h post-
`transfection the unmodified siRNA (AB) shows the biggest
`reduction in PTEN protein levels; however, at 120 h post-
`transfection the reduction in PTEN protein expression is
`superior with the siRNAs stabilised by alternating 2¢-O-
`methyl modifications (Fig. 5D, compare lane 2 with lanes 4,
`
`

`

`Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 11
`
`2711
`
`Ratio PTEN/p110a
`
`5 '
`3'
`
`cguuagcagaaacaaaaggag- TT
`TT- gcaaucgucuuuguuuuccuc
`
`NH2 - cguuagcagaaacaaaaggag- TT-NH2
`5 '
`3 ' NH2 - TT- gcaaucgucuuuguuuuccuc-NH2
`
`5 '
`3'
`
`iB- cguuagcagaaacaaaaggag- TT- iB
`iB- TT- gcaaucguc uuuguuuuccu c- iB
`
`5 '
`3 '
`
`NH2- cguuagcagaaacaaaaggag- TT-NH2
`i B- TT- gcaauc guc uuuguuuuccu c
`
`NH2- cguuagcagaaacaaaaggag- TT-NH2
`5 '
`3 ' NH2- TT- gcaaucgucuuuguuuuccuc
`
`5 '
`3 '
`
`5'
`3 '
`
`NH2- cguuagcagaaacaaaaggag- TT-NH2
`TT-gcaaucguc uuuguuuuccuc
`
`NH2-cguuagcagaaacaaaaggag-TT-NH2
`gcaaucgucuuuguuuuccuc
`
`UT
`
`stability
`Serum O' 15' 120'
`
`activity
`
`A
`
`PTENl A
`PTENl B
`
`PTEN4A
`PTEN4B
`
`PTEN5A
`PTEN5B
`
`PTEN4A
`PTEN6B
`
`PTEN4A
`PTEITTB
`
`PTEN4A
`PTENlB
`
`PTEN4A
`PTEN2B
`
`B
`
`- - - - -TT
`TT - - - - -
`
`TT
`
`iB-
`iB-TT
`
`NH2 -
`NB,-TT
`
`NHz- TT
`
`TT
`
`TT- iB
`-iB
`
`TT-NB2
`- NH2
`
`TT-NH2
`
`llll lll'IIIIIII TT
`TT jjjj j j jj jjjjjj f
`
`+++
`
`+++
`
`+++
`
`-
`-
`
`+++
`
`-
`
`Figure 4. RNAi activity and stability in serum of modified siRNA molecules. (A) Activity of siRNA with modified termini. 19mer duplex siRNAs specific
`for PTEN mRNA were synthesised with 2 nt deoxythymidine (TT) 3¢ overhangs or without overhangs. iB represents inverted deoxy abasic end modifications,
`NH2 represents end protection with amino-C6 linker at the terminal phosphates. Inhibition of PTEN mRNA expression in HeLa cells transfected with the
`indicated amounts of modified siRNA molecules was determined by Taqman analysis as described before. (B) Stability assay of siRNAs with different
`chemical modifications. The structure of the modified siRNA molecules are schematically shown on the left. The siRNA molecule at the bottom was
`synthesized with 2¢-O-methyl ribonucleotides (A, G, U and C) at all positions, indicated by IIIIII. Polyacrylamide gel (10%) electrophoresis of the indicated
`siRNA molecules after incubation in serum as described in Materials and Methods.
`
`

`

`2712 Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 11
`
`A
`
`Ratio PTEN/p110a
`
`.,
`
`w
`
`0
`
`UT
`
`PTEN 2A
`PTEN 2B
`
`S • cguua9cageoocaa.aa9 gag
`3 · gcaaucgucuuuQuuuuecuc
`
`PTEN2AMM 5 • C9ll9A9(:1"caaa9Aa.aAu9.,9
`PTEN28MM 3 • gcacucguguuucuuuuac uc
`
`PTENV1
`
`5 . ~2£!2:&UCH.&IISISllllS,:
`J ' ~IUJOCIIJCUUUCNUUUOCUC
`
`PTENV2
`
`5 . CQUU~~IHlAC.!IM~ iQ
`J . QC&AUOIJUCUU~WUOC'UC
`
`PTENV3
`
`5' c9uu!9:C:!51:aa&e-.a~9ag
`J · ocaaU()(lUCUu~\NUOCUC
`
`PTENV4
`
`5 • C9\lU.S9C40UAC.U.1&.,9gAg
`3' gcaai.K.~UCCUC
`
`PTENV5
`
`5 • 9l!:!!:!!;2C!2_!a.c•u•S12"SI:
`3 • gc;.ao)U~\!Cuuuguuuuocuc
`
`PTENV6
`
`5 · c9Uuaocaqaaacaa.aaq9a9
`3 ' qcuuoqucuuuquuuuocuc
`
`PTENV7
`
`5 • cquupoc:pgauc:atuu1ggag
`J · gcaaucqucuuugu\Nuoeuc
`
`PTENVS
`
`5 • cguuagcagaaacw:'99!'9
`3 · geaauoquouuu9uuuuccuc
`
`PTENV9
`
`S · 9l!!!:!!5lei1S[aaa.ca..-asm:all
`J • 9C44UC~
`UtlU(."CUC
`
`PTEN V10 5 · cguuaoe~
`J '~UCllV~
`
`caa.a!.i!l!i
`UOCUC
`
`PTENV11 5 • 0Cl'UUaOC!Slau.caaaaSISl!51:
`J'ocaau~
`uocuc
`
`PTEN V12 S ' S.9!.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket