throbber
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
`Volume 18, Number 1, 2003
`© 2003 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
`
`Intravenous Neridronate in Adults With Osteogenesis Imperfecta
`
`S ADAMI,1 D GATTI,1 F COLAPIETRO,1 E FRACASSI,1 V BRAGA,1 M ROSSINI,1 and L TATO` 2
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a heritable disease of connective tissue, characterized by increased bone
`fragility. Bisphosphonates currently seems to be the most promising therapy, at least in children. We tested
`IV neridronate, an amino-bisphosphonate structurally similar to alendronate and pamidronate in adults with
`OI. Twenty-three men and 23 premenopausal women with OI were randomized to either iv neridronate (100
`mg infused intravenously for 30 minutes every 3 months) or no treatment with a ratio of 2 to 1. Control
`patients were given the same bisphosphonate therapy at the end of the first year. Clinical evaluation included
`bone densitometry measurements using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), fasting serum and urinary
`biochemistry every 6 months, and radiographs of the spine taken at baseline and after 12 and 24 months of
`follow-up. Spine and hip bone mineral density rose by 3.0 ⴞ 4.6% (SD) and by 4.3 ⴞ 3.9%, respectively, within
`the first 12 months of treatment, whereas small insignificant changes were observed in the control group.
`During the second year of follow-up, additional 3.91% and 1.49% increases were observed at the spine and
`hip, respectively. Markers of skeletal turnover significantly fell during neridronate treatment. Fracture
`incidence during neridronate treatment was significantly lower than before therapy and compared with
`controls. Neridronate iv infusions, administered quarterly, significantly increase bone mineral density and
`lowered the risk of clinical fracture in adults with OI. Bisphosphonate therapy seems to provide clinical
`benefits, not only to children with OI, but also to adult patients. (J Bone Miner Res 2003;18:126 –130)
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA (OI) is a heritable disease of
`
`connective tissue caused by heterologous mutations in
`the genes encoding for type I collagen and characterized by
`increased bone fragility.(1) Four types are commonly distin-
`guished based on clinical and genetic features, although
`overlap forms are often observed. In its mildest form (type
`I), fractures tend to occur mostly before puberty and again
`after menopause. Type II OI leads to perinatal death. Type
`III OI causes fractures that are very frequent, resulting in
`short stature, severe deformities, and shortened life expect-
`ancy. These fractures are also typical of type IV but are less
`severe.(2)
`Several therapies have been proposed for the treatment of
`OI, including fluoride, calcitonin,(3) growth hormone,(4) and
`bone marrow transplantation.(5) To date, bisphosphonates
`seems to be the most promising therapy, at least for children
`with OI. Beneficial effect were reported in a number of early
`relatively small studies,(6 –11) which have been recently sup-
`ported in a larger cohort of children treated for up to 5 years
`
`The authors have no conflict of interest.
`
`with cyclical iv pamidronate.(12) This treatment resulted in
`significant increases in bone mineral density (BMD) by dual
`energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at any investigated
`skeletal site, leading to a partial catch-up toward normal
`values. These BMD changes were reported with increased
`physical activity and lower fracture risk compared with
`retrospective events.(12,13)
`However, all these studies were carried out in children
`with severe OI and understandably encourage bisphospho-
`nate therapy for adults with type I OI.
`In 1995, in collaboration with the Istituto Superiore di
`Sanita` (part of the Ministry of Health) and of the Italian
`Association of patients with OI [AsItOI]), we initiated a
`large randomized, controlled therapeutical trial of iv neridr-
`onate in all patients with OI. Here, we report the preliminary
`results obtained in men and in premenopausal women.
`Neridronate is an amino-bisphosphonate structurally similar
`to alendronate and pamidronate, differing only in the num-
`ber of methyl groups of the side-chain: five for neridronate,
`three for alendronate, and two for pamidronate.(14) It has
`been investigated for the treatment of Paget’s disease of
`bone(15–18) and recently registered in Italy for the treatment
`
`1Rheumatologic Rehabilitation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
`2Clinica Pediatrica, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
`
`126
`
`Grun. Exh. 1014
`PGR for U.S. Patent No. 9,707,245
`
`

`

`BISPHOSPHONATES IN ADULTS WITH OSTEOGENEIS IMPERFECTA
`
`127
`
`Patients
`
`All
`
`Active group
`
`Control group
`
`N
`
`46
`
`31
`
`15
`
`TABLE 1. PRINCIPAL CLINICAL AND ANAGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDY POPULATION
`
`Type of OI
`(I—III—IV)
`
`Sex
`(male—female)
`
`Age
`[mean ⫾ SD (range)]
`
`Weight
`[mean ⫾ SD (range)]
`
`Height
`[mean ⫾ SD (range)]
`
`38—2—6
`
`26—2—3
`
`23—23
`
`15—16
`
`12—0—3
`
`8—7
`
`34.9 ⫾ 7.9
`(21–50)
`35.1 ⫾ 7.1
`(22–48)
`34.7 ⫾ 9.3
`(21–50)
`
`57.8 ⫾ 13.6
`(22–87)
`57.7 ⫾ 11.7
`(31–77)
`57.9 ⫾ 16.9
`(22–87)
`
`150.9 ⫾ 20.7
`(90–180)
`151.3 ⫾ 17.9
`(111–180)
`150.4 ⫾ 25.7
`(90–180)
`
`TABLE 2. BASELINE BONE DENSITOMETRY AND BONE MARKERS (SERUM BONE ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE [BAP], SERUM CROSS-LAPS [SCTX],
`AND URINARY FREE-IDROSSY PYRIDINOLINE [UFDPD]) VALUES OF STUDY POPULATION
`
`N
`
`46
`
`31
`
`15
`
`All
`
`Active group
`
`Control group
`
`Normal range
`
`Spine BMD
`[mg/cm2 (T score)]
`
`Hip BMD
`[mg/cm2 (T score)]
`
`BAP (U/I)
`
`sCTX
`(pmol/liter)
`
`ufDPD
`(nmol/mmol creatinine)
`
`727 ⫾ 103
`(⫺3.4 ⫾ 1.0)
`712 ⫾ 105
`(⫺3.5 ⫾ 1.0)
`766 ⫾ 98
`(⫺3.0 ⫾ 0.9)
`
`727 ⫾ 103
`(⫺2.5 ⫾ 1.5)
`721 ⫾ 152
`(⫺2.6 ⫾ 1.4)
`762 ⫾ 190
`(⫺2.3 ⫾ 1.6)
`
`20.1 ⫾ 9.1
`
`2366 ⫾ 1706
`
`19.0 ⫾ 8.7
`
`2295 ⫾ 1718
`
`20.6 ⫾ 9.4
`
`2468 ⫾ 1844
`
`10.4 ⫾ 13.3
`
`10.9 ⫾ 13.2
`
`10.0 ⫾ 13.7
`
`11.5–25.1
`
`1111–2559
`
`2.3–7.8
`
`of OI based on clinical trial, the results of which are, in part,
`reported here.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Patients
`
`All subjects affected by any type of OI and registered
`with the AsItOI were informed by the association newslet-
`ter, either directly or through their parents, regarding the
`possibility to participate in a clinical trial of a new bisphos-
`phonate. Several others contacted our center after a public
`appeal on national radio. After excluding the patients who
`had already received bisphosphonates or were younger than
`3 years, an informed written consent was obtained from 209
`patients. Seventy-eight of these were adults, and 46 con-
`cluded after the first 2 years of study follow-up. These latter
`patients provide the data for this per-protocol, pre-planned,
`interim analysis. The principal characteristics of the 46
`patients are listed in Tables 1 and 2. The history of prior
`clinical fracture during 4 years preceding recruitment was
`carefully collected from all patients.
`
`Treatment
`
`The patients were randomized according to OI type (type
`I or type III and IV) to either iv neridronate or no treatment
`with a ratio of 2 to 1. One hundred milligrams neridronate
`diluted in 250 ml of saline solution was infused intrave-
`nously in 30 minutes every 3 months. The dose used was the
`lowest effective dose in lowering biochemical evidence of
`Paget’s disease activity by 50% after a single infusion.(15–18)
`All patients had their dietary calcium intake regularly
`evaluated and maintained above 1000 mg daily, through
`diet or supplementation. Vitamin D2 supplements (50,000 U
`
`monthly) were given if the serum 25OH-vitamin D levels
`fell below 20 ng/ml. Calcium and/or vitamin D2 supple-
`ments were necessary throughout the study in five of the
`patients. It is worth noting that all patients but one had
`adequate calcium and vitamin D intake for years, because of
`the continuous educational program from AsItOI.
`The control patients commenced the neridronate treat-
`ment after 12 months of follow-up with continued con-
`trolled calcium and vitamin D intake.
`Study protocol was approved and constantly monitored
`by the local ethical committee and the Istututo Superiore
`della Sanita` (part of the Italian Ministry of Health).
`Measurements
`
`All patients were seen at 3-month intervals, but full
`clinical evaluation including bone densitometry measure-
`ments by DXA and fasting serum and urinary (second
`morning voiding) biochemistry was obtained per-protocol
`every 6 months. Radiographs of the spine (anteroposterior
`and lateral views) were obtained at baseline and after 12 and
`24 months. Prevalent vertebral fractures were identified and
`graded blindly by a semiquantitative scale.(19) A new ver-
`tebral fracture was defined as a decrease in anterior, mid-, or
`posterior vertebral height of at least 4 mm. Additional
`X-rays were obtained at any skeletal site whenever symp-
`toms of fractures occurred. All patients were assessed for
`clinical fractures that had occurred during the 4 years pre-
`ceding recruitment. An interim analysis of fracture rate was
`a safety end-point specifically required by the ethical com-
`mittee.
`Changes in the BMD at the lumbar spine and total hip
`were measured by DXA (QDR 4000; Hologic, Waltham,
`MA, USA). The precision error for BMD at different skel-
`
`

`

`128
`
`ADAMI ET AL.
`
`etal sites ranges from 0.9% to 2.1% in subjects with a wide
`range of bone mass values.
`Serum cross-laps (sCTX; Osteometer Biotech, Herler, Den-
`mark), urinary free-deoxy pyridinoline (ufDPD, Pyrilinks-D;
`Metra Biosystems, Mountain View, CA, USA), and serum
`bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP, Alkphase–B; Metra Bio-
`systems) were measured by enzyme-linked immunoabsor-
`bent assay. The inter- and intra-assay variations ranged from
`7% to 12%.
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`The within-subject changes in BMD and in biochemical
`markers were tested by two-sided paired t-test, and the
`between group differences were tested by analysis of vari-
`ance (ANOVA) and then by Student t-test. Intention-to-treat
`analysis was planned, but it was not applied because all
`patients completed the treatment follow-up.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Before treatment, all subjects had normal serum calcium,
`phosphate, 25 OH-vitamin D (⬎12 ng/ml), and parathyroid
`hormone (PTH) levels (Allegro intact PTH, normal val-
`ues ⬍ 60 pg/ml), and there was no evidence of other
`relevant diseases. The two groups of patients were compa-
`rable with for age, weight, height, and female-male ratio,
`and nonstatistically different for bone markers and baseline
`BMD values (Tables 1 and 2), which was below the World
`Health Organization (WHO) definition of osteoporosis(20) in
`81% of the patients at the spine. The distribution of the type
`of OI was also similar.
`The mean changes in BMD in the two groups are shown
`in Fig. 1. Spine and hip BMD rose by 3.0 ⫾ 4.6% and by
`4.3 ⫾ 3.9%, respectively, after the first 12 months of treat-
`ment, whereas small insignificant changes were observed in
`the control group. During the second year, additional 3.9%
`and 1.5% increases were observed at the spine and hip,
`respectively, in the treatment group. The densitometric re-
`sponse to treatment during the second year in the patients
`who served as controls during the first year was very similar
`to the changes obtained during the first year by the first
`group.
`In Table 3, the pooled BMD changes during administra-
`tion of neridronate are listed according to gender and sep-
`arately for the patients with type I OI. There were no
`differences in the BMD increments between men and
`women. All patients with type III and IV OI had BMD
`increases (data not shown) at the end of the 1 year treatment
`that were greater than 3% as the lowest detectable change
`(CV% ⫻ 2公2) in individual subjects for our instrument.
`Markers of skeletal
`turnover significantly fell during
`neridronate treatment. The mean decrease was 20% for BAP
`and 25% for sCTX. ufDPD also decreased by 20%, but the
`changes were less consistent throughout the treatment
`(Fig. 2).
`Some deformities (N1 to 3) of thoracic and lumbar ver-
`tebrae, mostly of grade 1, were visible at baseline in all
`patients. Overt morphometric fracture (grade ⱖ 2) were
`found in 21 of the patients. One clinical-morphometric
`vertebral fracture and one limb fracture occurred in the
`
`FIG. 1. Bone mineral density changes during treatment with iv
`neridronate (solid line) and control period (dashed line): *p ⬍ 0.05
`between groups; †p ⬍ 0.05 from baseline; ‡p ⬍ 0.001 from baseline.
`
`control group during the first year of observation. One limb
`fracture was recorded in the treatment patients, but no
`fractures occurred in the control group while on treatment
`during the second year of follow-up. Overall, 18 clinical
`fractures during 4 years prior recruitment were reported by
`16 patients. The most recent clinical fracture occurred 5
`months prior recruitment. The difference in fracture inci-
`dence during treatment (1/77 patient-years) and during
`pooled pre-recruitment and control time (18/199 patient-
`years) was at the limit of significance (p ⫽ 0.03; Fisher’s
`exact t-test; relative risk [RR], 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02 to 1.09).
`Thirteen of the patients complained of flu-like symptoms,
`resembling a typical acute phase reaction,(21) 24 –36 h after
`the first iv infusion, lasting less than 36 h. An attenuated
`reaction was also noted by four patients after the second
`infusion. None of the patients complained of symptomatic
`hypocalcemia or other side effects associated with iv ami-
`nobisphosphonate administration.(22)
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`This the first “per-protocol” controlled clinical trial car-
`ried out
`in patients with OI, although in some studies
`attempts were made to have control data.(12,13) This is also
`the first report on the effects of bisphosphonate therapy in
`adults.
`Bone fragility in OI results from quantitative and quali-
`tative alterations in type I collagen that are not expected to
`benefit directly from a treatment with antiresorbing agents,
`
`

`

`BISPHOSPHONATES IN ADULTS WITH OSTEOGENEIS IMPERFECTA
`
`129
`
`TABLE 3. PERCENT CHANGES OF SPINE AND OF HIP BONE MINERAL DENSITY (BMD) IN TYPE I OI PATIENTS (POOLING ACTIVE GROUP AND
`THE FIRST YEAR OF TREATMENT OF THE CONTROL GROUP) AFTER NERIDRONATE THERAPY ACCORDING TO GENDER
`(NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS IN BRACKETS)
`
`Time intervals (months)
`
`All patients
`
`Males
`
`Females
`
`Type I patients
`
`Spine BMD
`0–6
`0–12
`0–18
`0–24
`Hip BMD
`0–6
`0–12
`0–18
`0–24
`
`* p ⬍ 0.02 from baseline.
`
`3.0 ⫾ 6.4 (46)*
`3.6 ⫾ 5.4 (46)*
`4.6 ⫾ 6.0 (31)*
`6.9 ⫾ 3.5 (31)*
`
`1.2 ⫾ 3.5 (29)
`3.5 ⫾ 3.9 (29)*
`5.5 ⫾ 5.1 (19)*
`7.6 ⫾ 6.3 (19)*
`
`1.8 ⫾ 7.2 (23)
`2.5 ⫾ 5.5 (23)
`4.2 ⫾ 6.9 (17)*
`6.4 ⫾ 3.6 (17)*
`
`1.2 ⫾ 2.2 (15)
`4.2 ⫾ 2.7 (15)*
`5.7 ⫾ 3.1 (10)*
`5.5 ⫾ 2.1 (10)*
`
`4.4 ⫾ 5.2 (23)*
`4.8 ⫾ 5.3 (23)*
`5.1 ⫾ 5.0 (14)*
`7.5 ⫾ 3.3 (14)*
`
`1.1 ⫾ 4.6 (14)
`2.7 ⫾ 4.8 (14)*
`5.4 ⫾ 6.7 (9)*
`9.8 ⫾ 8.5 (9)*
`
`2.9 ⫾ 6.4 (38)*
`3.2 ⫾ 5.3 (38)*
`4.3 ⫾ 6.2 (26)*
`6.7 ⫾ 3.3 (26)*
`
`0.9 ⫾ 3.4 (26)
`3.6 ⫾ 3.7 (26)*
`5.7 ⫾ 4.9 (18)*
`6.7 ⫾ 5.7 (18)*
`
`such as bisphosphonates. However, there is histomorpho-
`metric and biochemical evidence of
`increased bone
`resorption.(23–25) This was also somewhat apparent in the
`patients described here and in the entire cohort of our
`patients. The high bone turnover might be caused by recur-
`rent fracture or be directly related to the abnormal bone
`structure, but it might contribute to the pathogenesis of OI.
`In fact, beneficial effects of antiresorptive agents were
`shown in children with OI, in whom intermittent iv pam-
`idronate resulted in large and sustained increases in
`BMD.(12) The substantial effect on bone mass observed in
`that study might has been related to the young age of the
`patients (very high bone turnover); however, a control group
`was not reported.
`In our study, we show that intermittent iv neridronate
`results in significant increases in BMD in adult OI patients.
`The magnitude of the observed changes in bone mass
`should be considered clinically relevant based on the rela-
`tionship found in postmenopausal osteoporosis between
`BMD changes and fracture risk reduction during bisphos-
`phonate therapy.(26) In fact, a trend for a reduction in frac-
`ture rate, which was significant by pooling retrospective and
`prospective events, was observed, although the study was
`not powered for such an endpoint(s). On the other hand, in
`comparing retrospective to prospective events, the effect of
`improved education associated with the participation “per
`se” to a clinical trial, on reducing risks of trauma (falling,
`lifting heavy objects, etc.), cannot be excluded.
`The increases in BMD observed during neridronate therapy
`are likely caused by suppression of bone resorption and sec-
`ondary lowering of bone remodeling space.(27) In children with
`OI treated with pamidronate, an improvement in the balance
`between bone formation and bone resorption has been sug-
`gested based on the relative changes in urinary N-telopeptide
`of type I collagen and alkaline phosphatase markers of bone
`resorption and bone formation, respectively.(12) In our adult
`patients, the pattern of changes in bone markers did not
`support this hypothesis, with an apparent equivalent sup-
`pression for both. The magnitude of changes in bone mark-
`ers was less than observed in children with OI given iv
`pamidronate(12) or in postmenopausal women after oral 10
`mg alendronate or 5 mg risedronate.(28,29) This does not
`
`FIG. 2. Changes in bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), serum CTX
`(sCTX), and urinary free DPD/creatinine ratio (ufDPD) during treat-
`ment with iv neridronate (solid line) and control period (dashed line):
`*p ⬍ 0.05 between groups; †p ⬍ 0.05 from baseline; ‡p ⬍ 0.01 from
`baseline.
`
`

`

`130
`
`ADAMI ET AL.
`
`imply that neridronate was underdosed. In fact, in prior
`studies, baseline bone turnover was considerably greater
`than documented in our male or premenopausal adult pa-
`tients with OI. It should also be recalled that sCTX was
`measured 3 months after the last infusion of neridronate and
`immediately before the next one when bone resorption had
`possibly resumed. Our results cannot be easily compared
`with others because bisphosphonates have been rarely eval-
`uated in premenopausal women or in young men without
`focal bone diseases.
`In conclusion, iv infusions of neridronate given quarterly
`increase bone density in adults with OI, and this is associ-
`ated with a lower risk for clinical fracture. Until now, data
`indicating some clinical benefit of bisphosphonate therapy
`were available only for growing individuals with the most
`severe form of the disease. The densitometric results and the
`effects on fracture rate we observed support the efficacy of
`bisphosphonate treatment for adults with type I OI, in whom
`fracture risk can be at least as large as that observed in
`postmenopausal women in whom a T score ⬍ ⫺2.5 SD
`represents a widely accepted threshold for pharmacologic
`intervention. An additional benefit of bisphosphonates ther-
`apy in adults with OI may be the preservation of better bone
`mass for later age or after menopause.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Smith R 1986 Osteogenesis imperfecta. Clin Rheum Dis 12:655–
`689.
`2. Sillence DO, Senn A, Danks DM 1979 Genetic heterogeneity in
`osteogenesis imperfecta. J Med Genet 16:101–116.
`3. Castells S 1973 New approaches to treatment of osteogenesis
`imperfecta. Clin Orthop 93:239 –249.
`4. Marini JC, Bordenick S, Heavner G, Rose S, Hintz R, Rosenfeld R,
`Chrousos GP 1993 The growth hormone and somatomedian axis in
`short children with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Clin Endocrinol
`Metab 76:251–256.
`5. Horewitz EM, Prockop DJ, Gordon PL, Koo WW, Fitzpatrick LA,
`Neel MD, McCarville ME, Orchard PJ, Pyeritz RE, Brenner MK
`2001 Clinical responses to bone marrow transplantation in children
`with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. Blood 97:1227–1231.
`6. Devogelaer JP, Malghem J, Maldague B, Nagant de Deuxchaisnes
`C 1987 Radiological manifestations of bisphosphonate treatment
`with APD in a child suffering from osteogenesis imperfecta. Skel-
`etal Radiol 16:360 –363.
`7. Huaux JP, Lokietek W 1988 Is APD a promising drug in the
`treatment of severe osteogenesis imperfecta? J Pediatr Orthop
`8:71–72.
`8. Brumsen C, Hamdy NAT, Papapoulos SE 1997 Long-term effects of
`bisphosphonates on the growing skeleton: Studies of young patients
`with severe osteoporosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 76:266–283.
`9. Bembi B, Parma A, Bottega M, Ceschel S, Zanatta M, Martini C,
`Ciana G 1997 Intravenous pamidronate treatment in osteogenesis
`imperfecta. J Pediatr 131:622– 625.
`10. Åstro¨m E, So¨derha¨ll S 1998 Beneficial effect of bisphosphonate
`during five years of treatment of severe osteogenesis imperfecta.
`Acta Pediatr 87:64 – 68.
`11. Gonzalez E, Pavia C, Ros J, Villaronga M, Valls C, Escola J 2001
`Efficacy of low dose schedule pamidronate infusion in children with
`osteogenesis imperfecta. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 14:529–533.
`12. Glorieux FH, Bishop NJ, Plotkin H, Chabot G, Lanoue G, Travers
`R 1998 Cyclic administration of pamidronate in children with
`severe osteogenesis imperfecta. N Engl J Med 339:947–952.
`13. Plotkin H, Rauch F, Bishop NJ, Montpetit K, Ruck-Gibis J,
`Travers R, Glorieux FH 2000 Pamidronate treatment of severe
`
`osteogenesis imperfecta in children under 3 years of age. J Clin
`Endocrinol Metab 85:1846 –1850.
`14. Fleisch H 2000 Bisphosphonates: Mechanism of action. Endocri-
`nol Rev 19:80 –100.
`15. McCloskey EV, Yates AJ, Beneton MN, Galloway J, Harris S, Kanis
`JA 1987 Comparative effects of intravenous diphosphonates on cal-
`cium and skeletal metabolism in man. Bone 8(Suppl 1):S35–S41.
`16. Delmas PD, Chapuy MC, Edouard C, Meunier PJ 1987 Beneficial
`effects of aminohexane diphosphonate in patients with Paget’s disease
`of bone resistant to sodium etidronate. Am J Med 83:276–282.
`17. Atkins RM, Yates AJ, Gray RE, Urwin GH, Hamdy NA, Beneton
`MN, Rosini S, Kanis JA 1987 Aminohexane diphosphonate in the
`treatment of Paget, s disease of bone. J Bone Miner Res 2:273–9.
`18. Adami S, Bevilacqua M, Broggini M, Filipponi P, Ortolani S,
`Palummeri E, Ulivieri F, Nannipieri F, Braga V 2002 Short-term
`intravenous therapy with neridronate in Paget’s disease. Clin Exper
`Rheumatol 220:55–58.
`19. Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin RS, Black D,
`Cummings SR for the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research
`Group 1996 Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantita-
`tive morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral
`fractures in osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 11:984 –996.
`20. WHO 1994 Assessment of fracture risk and its application to
`screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical report
`series, 843, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
`21. Adami S, Bhalla AK, Dorizzi R, Montesanti F, Rosini S, Salvagno
`G, LoCascio V 1987 The acute-phase response after bisphospho-
`nate administration. Calcif Tissue Int 41:326 –331.
`22. Adami S, Zamberlan N 1996 Adverse effects of bisphosphonates:
`A comparative review. Drug Safety 14:158 –170.
`23. Baron R, Gertner JM, Lang R, Vignery A 1983 Increased bone
`turnover with decreased bone formation by osteoblasts in children
`with osteogenesis imperfecta tarda. Pediatr Res 17:204 –207.
`24. Brenner RE, Vetter U, Bollen Am, Mo¨rike M, Eyre DR 1994 Bone
`resorption assessed by immunoassay of urinary cross linked col-
`lagen peptides in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone
`Miner Res 9:993–997.
`25. Glorieux FH, Travers R, Chabot G, Lanoue G 1994 Bone histo-
`morphometric analysis in osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Miner
`Res 9(Suppl 1):S226.
`26. Hockberg MA, Greenspan S, Wasnich RD, Miller P, Thompson
`DE, Ross PD 2002 Changes in bone density and turnover explain
`the reductions in incidence of nonvertebral fractures that occur
`during treatment with antiresorptive agents. J Clin Endocrinol
`Metab 87:1586 –1592.
`27. Adami S, Kanis JA 1995 Assessment of involutional bone loss:
`Methodological and conceptual problems. J Bone Miner Res 10:
`511–517.
`28. Chesnut CH, McClung MR, Ensrud KE, Bell NH, Genant HK,
`Harris ST, Singer SR, Stock JL, Yood RA, Delmas PD, Pryor-
`Tillotson S, Santora AC 1995 Alendronate treatment of the post-
`menopausal osteoporotic woman: Effect of multiple dosages on
`bone mass and bone remodeling. Am J Med 99:144 –152.
`29. Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, McKeever CD, Hangartner T,
`Keller M, Chesnut CH, Brown J, Eriksen EF, Hoseyni MS, Axel-
`rod DW, Miller PD 1999 Effects of risedronate treatment on
`vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in women with postmeno-
`pausal osteoporosis. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 282:
`1344 –1352.
`
`Address reprint requests to:
`Silvano Adami, MD
`Ospedale
`37067 Valeggio
`Verona, Italy
`
`Received in original form June 4, 2002; in revised form July 24,
`2002; accepted August 1, 2002.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket