`Application No.
`Applicant(s)
`
`
`
`
` ; is ; 13/926,959 WU ETAL.
`
`Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary
`_
`_
`Examiner
`Art Unit
`
`
`
`SHENGJUN WANG 1627
`
`All participants (applicant, applicant's representative, PTO personnel):
`
`(1) SHENGJUN WANG.
`
`(2) Sreeni Padmanabhan.
`
`Date of Interview: 15 January 2016.
`
`(3) Joy Lymnn Nemirow.
`
`(4)
`
`Type:
`
`[] Video Conference
`{1 Telephonic
`(] Personal [copy given to: L) applicant [ applicant's representative]
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted:
`lf Yes, brief description:
`
`[[] Yes
`
`CT No.
`
`[101 112 (102 103 [Jothers
`Issues Discussed
`(For each of the checked box(es) above, please describe below the issue and detailed description of the discussion)
`
`Claim(s) discussed: 7.
`
`Identification of prior art discussed: All prior art cited in prior office action.
`
`Substance of Interview
`(For each issue discussed, provide a detailed description and indicate if agreement was reached. Some topics mayinclude; identification orclarification of a
`reference or a portion thereof, claim interpretation, proposed amendments, arguments ofany applied referencesetc...)
`
`172 first
`The rejections set forth in prior office action have been discussed. For the rejection under 35 U.S.C.
`paragraph, Written description rejection, the scope of Ar and L1 have been discussed. Allowable subject matters have
`also been discussed. It is agreed that the application has support for L1 as amide or a bond, and Ar as bicyclic nitrogen-
`containing heteroaryl with the proviso in the claims. The examiner further indicate that compounds with L1 is -NH-C(O)-
`and Ar is nitrogen containing bicyclic heteroaryl, with the proviso therein, are allowable. Applicants will fully consider
`whether to take the allowable subject now andfilie continuation_persueing other subject matter orto file to file RCE for
`a broad scope of claims .
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: The formal written reply to the last Office action must include the substanceof the interview. (See MPEP
`section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, applicant is given a non-extendable period of the longer of one month or
`thirty days from this interview date, or the mailing date of this interview summary form, whicheveris later, to file a statement of the substanceof the
`interview
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substance of any interview of record. A complete and proper recordation of the
`substanceof an interview should include the itemslisted in MPEP 713.04 for complete and proper recordation including the identification of the
`general thrust of each argument or issue discussed, a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the
`general results or outcomeof the interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issues raised.
`
`[x] Attachment
`/SHENGJUN WANG/
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1627
`
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-413 (Rev. 8/11/2010)
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20160121
`
`PETITIONER NPC EX. 1010
`Page 1 of 2
`
`PETITIONER NPC EX. 1010
` Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP), Section 713.04, Substance of Interview Must be Made of Record
`A complete written statement as to the substance of any face-to-face, video conference,or telephone interview with regard to an application must be made ofrecord in the
`application whether or not an agreement with the examiner was reachedal the interview
`
`Summary of Record of Interview Requirements
`
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 1.133 Interviews
`Paragraph (b)
`
`In every instance where reconsideration is requested in view of an interview with an examiner, a complete written statement of the reasons presented at the interview as
`warranting favorable action must be filed by the applicant. An interview does not remove the necessity for reply to Office action as specified in §§ 1.111, 1,135. (35 U.S.C. 132)
`
`37 CFR §1.2 Business to be transacted in writing.
`All business with the Patent or Trademark Office should be transacted in writing. The personal attendance of applicants or their attorneys or agents at the Patent and
`Trademark Office is unnecessary. The action of the Patent and Trademark Office will be based exclusively on the written record in the Office. No attention will be paid to
`any alleged oral promise, stipulation, or understandingin relation to which there is disagreement or doubt.
`
`
`The action of the Patent and Trademark Office cannot be based exclusively on the written record in the Office if that record is itself
`incomplete through the failure to record the substance ofinterviews.
`It is the responsibility of the applicant or the attorney or agent to make the substanceofan interview of record in the applicationfile, unless
`the examinerindicates he or she will do so.
`It is the examiner's responsibility to see that such a record is made and to correct material inaccuracies
`which beardirectly on the question of patentability.
`
`Examiners must complete an Interview Summary Form for each interview held where a matter of substance has been discussed during the
`interview by checking the appropriate boxes andfilling in the blanks. Discussions regarding only procedural matters, directed solely to restriction
`requirements for which interview recordation is otherwise provided for in Section 812.01 of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, or pointing
`out typographical errors or unreadable script in Office actions or the like, are excluded from the interview recordation procedures below. Where the
`substance of an interview is completely recorded in an Examiners Amendment, no separate Interview Summary Recordis required.
`
`The Interview Summary Form shall be given an appropriate Paper No., placed in the right hand portion of the file, and listed on the
`“Contents” section of the file wrapper.
`In a personalinterview, a duplicate of the Form is given to the applicant(or attorney or agent) at the
`conclusion of the interview.
`In the case of a telephone or video-conference interview, the copy is mailed to the applicant's correspondence address
`either with or prior to the next official communication. If additional correspondence from the examineris notlikely before an allowance orif other
`circumstances dictate, the Form should be mailed promptly after the interview rather than with the next official communication.
`
`The Form provides for recordation of the following information:
`- Application Number (Series Code and Serial Number)
`—Name of applicant
`—Name of examiner
`— Date of interview
`— Typeofinterview (telephonic, video-conference, or personal)
`—Name of participant(s) (applicant, attorney or agent, examiner, other PTO personnel, etc.)
`— Anindication whether or not an exhibit was shown or a demonstration conducted
`- An identification of the specific prior art discussed
`— An indication whether an agreement was reached andif so, a description of the general nature of the agreement (may be by
`attachment of a copy of amendments or claims agreed as being allowable). Note: Agreementas to allowability is tentative and does
`not restrict further action by the examiner to the contrary.
`-The signature of the examiner who conductedthe interview (if Form is not an attachmentto a signed Office action)
`
`It is desirable that the examiner orally remind the applicant of his or her obligation to record the substanceofthe interview of each case.It
`should be noted, however, that the Interview Summary Form will not normally be considered a complete and proper recordationof the interview
`unless it includes, or is supplemented by the applicant or the examinerto include, all of the applicable items required below conceming the
`substance of the interview.
`A complete and proper recordation of the substance of any interview should include at least the following applicable items:
`1) A brief description of the nature of any exhibit shown or any demonstration conducted,
`2) an identification of the claims discussed,
`3) an identification of the specific prior art discussed,
`4) an identification of the principal proposed amendments of a substantive nature discussed, unless these are already described on the
`Interview Summary Form completed by the Examiner,
`5) a brief identification of the general thrust of the principal arguments presented to the examiner,
`(The identification of arguments need not be lengthy or elaborate. A verbatim or highly detailed description of the argumentsis not
`required. The identification of the argumentsis sufficientif the general nature or thrust of the principal arguments madeto the
`examiner can be understood in the context of the application file. Of course, the applicant may desire to emphasize and fully
`describe those arguments which he or she feels were or might be persuasive to the examiner.)
`6) a generalindication of any other pertinent matters discussed, and
`7) if appropriate, the general results or outcomeofthe interview unless already described in the Interview Summary Form completed by
`the examiner.
`Examiners are expected to carefully review the applicant's record of the substanceofan interview.
`accurate, the examinerwill give the applicant an extendable one month time period to correct the record.
`
`If the record is not complete and
`
`Examiner to Check for Accuracy
`
`If the claims are allowable for other reasons of record, the examiner should sendaletter setting forth the examiner's version of the
`statementattributed to him or her.
`If the record is complete and accurate, the examiner should place theindication, “Interview Record OK" on the
`paper recording the substance of the interview along with the date and the examiner'sinitials.
`
`PETITIONER NPC EX. 1010
`Page 2 of 2
`
`PETITIONER NPC EX. 1010
` Page 2 of 2
`
`