`571.272.7822
`
`
`Paper No. 12
`
` Entered: October 1, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`LEVITATION ARTS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FLYTE LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case PGR2018-00073
`Patent D799,100
`____________
`
`Before JOHN C. KERINS, GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN,
`and BART A. GERSTENBLITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`OBERMANN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion to Correct a Clerical Error
`37 C.F.R. § 42.104(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PGR2018-00073
`Patent D799,100
`
`
`
`
`On September 6, 2018, Petitioner filed a Motion to Correct a Clerical
`Error. Paper 6 (“Motion”). Also on September 6, 2018, with the Motion,
`Petitioner filed the curriculum vitae of Petitioner’s witness, Mr. Geraint
`Krumpe. Ex. 1021 (“Krumpe CV”). In a nutshell, Petitioner requests leave
`to file the Krumpe CV in support of the Petition, without changing the filing
`date accorded to the Petition. Paper 6, 3; see Paper 5 (Notice of Filing Date
`Accorded Petition, dated July 3, 2018). Our rules contemplate that a
`petitioner may seek permission to correct a clerical error without changing
`the filing date accorded a petition. 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(c).
`Patent Owner did not file an opposition to the Motion. See Ex. 3001
`(email communication, authorizing briefing and setting forth a briefing
`schedule). Accordingly, we consider the Motion unopposed by Patent
`Owner.
`The Motion is supported by a Declaration of Mr. Brian Lynch, Lead
`Counsel for Petitioner in this proceeding. Ex. 1023 (Lynch Declaration);
`Paper 1 (“Petition”), 2 (identifying Mr. Lynch as Lead Counsel). Mr. Lynch
`provides credible and persuasive information that the Krumpe CV was
`inadvertently omitted from filing with the Petition due to a clerical error that
`occurred during a planned merging and uploading of the document as a PDF
`file to support the Declaration of Mr. Krumpe (Ex. 1003). Ex. 1023 ¶¶ 3–8.
`Mr. Lynch further shows sufficiently that, once the omission was
`discovered, Petitioner undertook timely and adequate measures to correct the
`clerical error and minimize any prejudice to Patent Owner. Id. at ¶¶ 9–11.
`Accordingly, we grant the Motion without requiring any change to the
`filing date accorded to the Petition.
`
`2
`
`
`
`PGR2018-00073
`Patent D799,100
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion to Correct a Clerical
`Error (Paper 6) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibit 1021, filed September 6, 2018,
`shall be considered in support of Mr. Krumpe’s Declaration (Ex. 1003); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the correction of the clerical error
`pertaining to Exhibit 1021 shall not disturb the filing date accorded to the
`Petition.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`PGR2018-00073
`Patent D799,100
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Brian P. Lynch
`Matthew G. McAndrews
`NIRO MCANDREWS, LLC
`blynch@niro-mcandrews.com
`mmcandrews@niro-mcandrews.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Nigamnarayan Acharya
`nigam.acharya@lewisbrisbois.com
`
`4
`
`