throbber
ARTICLE
`
`doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.002
`
`Design of Noninflammatory Synthetic siRNA Mediating
`Potent Gene Silencing in Vivo
`
`Adam D. Judge, Gurneet Bola, Amy C.H. Lee, Ian MacLachlan,*
`
`Protiva Biotherapeutics, 100-3480 Gilmore Way, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5G 4Y1
`
`*To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. Fax: +1 604 630 5103. E-mail: ian@protivabio.com.
`
`Available online 15 December 2005
`
`Targeted silencing of disease-associated genes by synthetic short interfering RNA (siRNA) holds
`considerable promise as a novel therapeutic strategy. However, unmodified siRNA can be potent
`triggers of the innate immune response, particularly when associated with delivery vehicles that
`facilitate intracellular uptake. This represents a significant barrier to the therapeutic development
`of siRNA due to toxicity and off-target gene effects associated with this inflammatory response.
`Here we show that immune stimulation by synthetic siRNA can be completely abrogated by
`selective incorporation of 2V-O-methyl (2VOMe) uridine or guanosine nucleosides into one strand
`of the siRNA duplex. These noninflammatory siRNA, containing less than 20% modified
`nucleotides, can be readily generated without disrupting their gene-silencing activity. We show
`that, coupled with an effective systemic delivery vehicle, 2VOMe-modified siRNA targeting
`apolipoprotein B (apoB) can mediate potent silencing of its target mRNA, causing significant
`decreases in serum apoB and cholesterol. This is achieved at therapeutically viable siRNA doses
`without cytokine induction, toxicity, or off-target effects associated with the use of unmodified
`siRNA. This approach to siRNA design and delivery should prove widely applicable and
`represents an important step in advancing synthetic siRNA into a broad range of therapeutic
`areas.
`
`Key Words: RNA interference, nucleic acid therapeutics, synthetic siRNA, chemical modification,
`inflammatory response, apolipoprotein B, interferons, liposomes
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Short interfering RNA (siRNA)1 are double-stranded RNA
`duplexes that silence target gene expression through the
`process of RNA interference (RNAi) [1]. Gene silencing by
`this evolutionarily conserved mechanism results from
`the sequence-specific degradation of mRNA when bound
`within the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) by its
`complementary siRNA strand [2,3]. Naturally occurring
`siRNA are derived from the cleavage of long double-
`stranded RNA (dsRNA) by the endonuclease Dicer with
`subsequent unwinding and loading of single strands into
`the RISC. RNAi can also be mediated by the transfection
`of chemically synthesized siRNA [4] and there is currently
`great interest in developing synthetic siRNA that target
`disease-associated genes as therapeutic agents [1]. In this
`
`1Abbreviations used: apoB, apolipoprotein B, TLR, Toll-like receptors,
`sRNAsingle-stranded RNA, dsRNA, double-stranded RNA, siRNA, short
`interfering RNA, IFN-a,
`interferon-a, IL-6,
`interleukin-6, TNF-a, tumor
`necrosis factor-a, RNAi, RNA interference, h-gal, h-galactosidase, PBMC,
`peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
`
`respect, several studies have now reported in vivo silenc-
`ing of endogenous [5] and viral genes [6–9] using
`synthetic siRNA administered via a clinically viable route.
`As part of the innate defense mechanism against
`invading pathogens, the mammalian immune system is
`activated by a number of exogenous RNA [10–12] and
`DNA species [13], resulting in the release of inflamma-
`tory cytokines and interferons (IFN) such as IFN-a.
`Initial studies on the off-target effects of siRNA focused
`on the induction of IFN responses from cell lines, most
`likely through activation of
`the dsRNA-dependent
`protein kinase (PKR)
`[14–16]. Our group [17] and
`others [18,19] have recently demonstrated that syn-
`thetic siRNA can also be potent activators of both the
`murine and the human innate immune system, partic-
`ularly when associated with lipidic or polycation-based
`vehicles that facilitate intracellular delivery via endo-
`somes. Although still poorly defined, immune recog-
`nition of siRNA is sequence dependent [17–19] and
`likely involves signaling through the endosomal Toll-
`like receptor-7 (TLR7) pathway [18]. The consequences
`
`494
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 13, No. 3, March 2006
`Copyright C The American Society of Gene Therapy
`1525-0016/$30.00
`
`Alnylam Exh. 1079
`
`

`

`doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.002
`
`ARTICLE
`
`of activating the innate immune response can be
`severe, particularly in more sensitive species, including
`humans [20,21], due to local and systemic inflamma-
`tory reactions that can be triggered by TLR ligands at
`very low doses. Toxicities associated with the admin-
`istration of siRNA in vivo have been attributed to such
`a response [9,17].
`Stabilization of synthetic siRNA against rapid nuclease
`degradation is often regarded as a prerequisite for in vivo
`and therapeutic applications. This is achieved using
`stabilization chemistries that were previously developed
`for ribozymes and antisense oligonucleotide drugs [22].
`These include chemical modifications to the 2V-OH group
`in the ribose sugar backbone, such as 2V-O-methyl
`(2VOMe) and 2V-fluoro (2VF) substitutions, that are readily
`introduced as modified nucleotides during siRNA syn-
`thesis. A number of reports have shown that siRNA
`containing 2VOMe [23–25], 2VF [24–27], 2V-deoxy [26], or
`blocked nucleic acidQ (LNA) [18,28] modifications can
`retain functional RNAi activity,
`indicating that these
`chemistries can be compatible with the RNAi machinery.
`However, these modifications to siRNA appear to be
`tolerated only in certain ill-defined positional or
`sequence-related contexts as, in many cases, their intro-
`duction has a negative impact on RNAi activity
`[18,23,25,26,28]. Therefore, the design of chemically
`modified siRNA has required a stochastic screening
`approach to identify duplexes that retain potent gene-
`silencing activity.
`Poor uptake of exogenous nucleic acids by cells
`represents an additional barrier to the development of
`siRNA-based drugs. To develop a delivery vehicle that
`enhances intracellular uptake of nucleic acids and is
`suitable for systemic administration, we have encapsu-
`lated siRNA within liposomes termed stable nucleic acid
`lipid particles (SNALP). These systems are effective at
`mediating RNAi in vitro [9,17] and have been shown to
`inhibit viral replication at therapeutically viable siRNA
`doses in a murine model of hepatitis B [9]. These studies
`led to the discovery that chemical modification of the
`siRNA (greater than 90% modified nucleotides), origi-
`nally designed to maximize serum stability and nuclease
`resistance, also abrogated the immunostimulatory prop-
`erties of the unmodified duplex.
`In this report, we demonstrate that only minimal
`2VOMe modifications within one strand of the duplex are
`sufficient to abrogate fully the immunostimulatory
`activity of siRNA, irrespective of its sequence. By restrict-
`ing the degree of chemical modification, noninflamma-
`tory siRNA that retain full RNAi activity can be readily
`generated. Using apolipoprotein B (apoB) as an endoge-
`nous gene target, we show that potent gene silencing can
`be achieved in vivo using these modified siRNA, without
`evidence of cytokine induction, immunotoxicity, or off-
`target effects associated with immune activation trig-
`gered by the unmodified siRNA.
`
`RESULTS
`2V-O-Methyl Modifications within ssRNA Abrogate
`Immune Stimulation
`We have recently shown that synthetic siRNA can
`activate innate immune responses in a sequence-depend-
`ent manner [17] and that this deleterious side effect is
`abrogated in stabilized siRNA with extensive chemical
`modifications (N90% of nucleotides) throughout the
`ribose backbone [9]. To examine the extent and type of
`chemical modification required to inhibit immune cell
`activation by RNA, we selectively introduced 2VOMe
`nucleotides into the GU-rich immunostimulatory motif
`of a single-stranded RNA oligonucleotide (ssRNA) derived
`from a h-galactosidase control (h-gal) siRNA [17]. Oligo-
`nucleotide sequences used in these studies are provided
`in Table 1. 2VOMe modification of the 5 nucleotides
`comprising the immunostimulatory 5V-UGUGU-3V motif
`(2VOMe GU) in the h-gal sense ssRNA completely abro-
`gated IFN-a induction when we treated human periph-
`eral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) cultures with lipid
`encapsulated ssRNA (Fig. 1A). Inhibition of the interferon
`response was also achieved by selectively modifying
`either the two guanosine (2VOMe 2  G) or the three
`uridine nucleotides (2VOMe 3  U) within the motif. The
`
`TABLE 1: RNA oligonucleotides
`Sequence 5V-3V
`
`Strand
`
`Native (S)
`UUGAUGUGUUUAGUCGCUAUU
`2VOMe GU(S)
`UUGAUGUGUUUAGUCGCUAUU
`2VOMe 3  U(S)
`UUGAUGUGUUUAGUCGCUAUU
`2VOMe 2  G(S)
`UUGAUGUGUUUAGUCGCUAUU
`2VOMe 2  G 3V(S) UUGAUGUGUUUAGUCGCUAUU
`Native (AS)
`*UAGCGACUAAACACAUCAAUU
`2VOMe AC(AS)
`*UAGCGACUAAACACAUCAAUU
`Native (S)
`GUCAUCACACUGAAUACCAAU
`2VOMe U(S)
`GUCAUCACACUGAAUACCAAU
`2VOMe G(S)
`GUCAUCACACUGAAUACCAAU
`2VOMe C(S)
`GUCAUCACACUGAAUACCAAU
`2VOMe A(S)
`GUCAUCACACUGAAUACCAAU
`Native (AS)
`*AUUGGUAUUCAGUGUGAUGACAC
`2VOMe GU(AS)
`*AUUGGUAUUCAGUGUGAUGACAC
`2VOMe U(AS)
`*AUUGGUAUUCAGUGUGAUGACAC
`2VOMe G(AS)
`*AUUGGUAUUCAGUGUGAUGACAC
`Native (S)
`GUGAUCAGACUCAAUACGAAU
`2VOMe U(S)
`GUGAUCAGACUCAAUACGAAU
`Native (AS)
`*AUUCGUAUUGAGUCUGAUCACAC
`2VOMe GU(AS)
`*AUUCGUAUUGAGUCUGAUCACAC
`Native (S)
`GUGGUAUUGUUCCUCCUAAdTdT
`2VOMe GU(S)
`GUGGUAUUGUUCCUCCUAAdTdT
`2VOMe U(S)
`GUGGUAUUGUUCCUCCUAAdTdT
`Native (AS)
`*UUAGGAGGAACAAUACCACdTdT
`2VOMe U(AS)
`*UUAGGAGGAACAAUACCACdTdT
`2VOMe C(AS)
`*UUAGGAGGAACAAUACCACdTdT
`Unmodified (native) and 2V-O-methyl modified (2VOMe) RNA oligonucleotides correspond-
`ing to the sense (S) and antisense (AS) strands of h-gal control, apoB-1, apoB mismatch,
`and vFLIP siRNA are shown. 2VOMe-modified nucleotides are underlined, asterisks represent
`5V phosphates.
`
`Name
`h-Gal
`
`apoB-1
`
`apoB
`mismatch
`
`vFLIP
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 13, No. 3, March 2006
`Copyright C The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`495
`
`

`

`ARTICLE
`
`doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.002
`
`inhibitory effect of 2V-O-methylation, however, did not
`appear to require the direct modification of the nucleo-
`tides within the immunostimulatory GU-rich motif since
`selective modification of the two guanosine residues 3V of
`the UGUGU motif, toward the end of the h-gal ssRNA
`(2VOMe 2  G 3V), also resulted in complete abrogation of
`the interferon response in PBMC cultures (Fig. 1A). As
`described previously, the unmodified complementary
`antisense (AS) ssRNA sequence was inherently nonim-
`munostimulatory in these assays [17]. We achieved
`similar results using the transfection reagent polyethyle-
`nimine (PEI) to deliver the RNA to PBMC (Supplementary
`Fig. S1). We applied a similar approach to the modifica-
`
`FIG. 1. 2VOMe modification abrogates ssRNA-mediated interferon induction in
`human PBMC. Liposome-encapsulated, unmodified (native) or 2VOMe U-, G-,
`or GU-modified ssRNA representing the sense (S) and antisense (AS) strands of
`(A) h-gal and (B) apoB-1 siRNA were cultured with PBMC at increasing
`concentrations (5–135 nM). Sequences are detailed in Table 1. IFN-a was
`assayed in culture supernatants at 24 h. Values are means + SD of triplicate
`cultures.
`
`tion of the constituent 21- and 23-base strands of an
`siRNA duplex targeting human and mouse apoB (apoB-1
`siRNA) [5]. As predicted by its GU-rich nucleotide
`sequence [11,17], unmodified apoB-1(AS) ssRNA stimu-
`lated a strong IFN-a response in PBMC cultures, even at
`low concentrations (Fig. 1B). This response was fully
`inhibited by 2VOMe modification of either the 5 nucleo-
`tides comprising the 5V-GUGUG-3V motif (2VOMe GU) or
`the 6 guanosine (2VOMe G) or 7 uridine (2VOMe U)
`residues in apoB-1(AS) ssRNA (Fig. 1B). The unmodified,
`complementary apoB-1 sense oligonucleotide (apoB-1(S))
`encapsulated in lipid particles did not induce IFN-a in
`PBMC (Fig. 1B), although high doses of this oligonucleo-
`tide delivered as PEI polyplexes were found to activate a
`cytokine response (not shown). This weak response to
`PEI-complexed apoB-1(S) ssRNA was also inhibited by
`2VOMe-uridine modification. These findings demonstrate
`that the selective incorporation of 2VOMe-modified
`nucleotides within ssRNA is sufficient to prevent stim-
`ulation of the interferon response from innate immune
`cells.
`
`Selective Nucleotide Modifications within siRNA
`Abrogate Immune Stimulation
`To examine whether selective 2VOMe modifications
`within siRNA duplexes also inhibited immune stimula-
`tion, we generated a series of h-gal and apoB-1 siRNA
`comprising 2VOMe-modified sense or AS strands
`annealed to their complementary unmodified oligonu-
`cleotides (see Table 1). As predicted by results for the
`constituent ssRNA (see Fig. 1A), double-stranded h-gal
`siRNA comprising the 2VOMe-modified UGUGU, 2  G,
`or 3  U sense strand annealed with the unmodified
`(nonimmunostimulatory) AS strand induced no detect-
`able interferon response from human PBMC (Fig. 2A).
`selective 2VOMe modification of
`Interestingly,
`the
`complementary 5V-ACACA-3V motif in the AS strand,
`juxtaposed to the unmodified 5V-UGUGU-3V motif in
`the sense strand, also diminished the level of IFN-a
`induction despite the annealed duplex containing the
`unmodified (immunostimulatory) sense strand (Fig.
`2A). We found similar results with modified apoB-1
`duplex siRNA (Fig. 2B). Unmodified apoB-1 siRNA
`induced a strong IFN-a response in PBMC and this
`reaction was completely abrogated when 2VOMe GU-,
`U-, or G-modified AS strands were incorporated in the
`apoB-1 duplex. Strikingly, modified apoB-1 siRNA
`containing 2VOMe G- or U-modified sense strands
`annealed to the unmodified,
`immunostimulatory, AS
`strand were also rendered nonimmunostimulatory (Fig.
`2B). Abrogation of cytokine induction by 2VOMe G or
`U modifications to the sense strands of modified apoB-
`1 siRNA appeared absolute as even high concentrations
`(675 nM, ~9 Ag/ml) of modified siRNA failed to induce
`IFN-a or inflammatory cytokines such as TNF in PBMC
`cultures (Figs. 2B and 2C).
`
`496
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 13, No. 3, March 2006
`Copyright C The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`

`

`doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.002
`
`ARTICLE
`
`FIG. 2. Selective 2VOMe modifications to siRNA
`duplexes abrogate cytokine induction in human PBMC.
`(A, B) Interferon-a and (C) TNF induction from human
`PBMC cultured with increasing concentrations (8–675
`nM) of encapsulated (A) h-gal or (B, C) apoB-1 or apoB
`mismatch siRNA. Cytokine responses to unmodified
`(native) siRNA were compared to duplexes containing
`2VOMe-modified U, G, C, or A residues in either the
`sense (S) or the antisense (AS) strands as indicated (see
`Table 1 for siRNA sequences). Secreted cytokines were
`assayed after 24 h culture. Values are means + SD of
`triplicate cultures.
`
`We did not observe the inhibitory effect of 2V-O-
`methylation on immune stimulation by siRNA with all
`patterns of modification, however, as apoB-1 siRNA
`containing 2VOMe-modified cytidine residues induced
`levels of cytokines similar to those induced by the native
`
`duplex (Fig. 2B). The incorporation of 2VOMe adenosine
`resulted in significant, but not absolute, inhibition of the
`cytokine response. These differences did not simply reflect
`the extent of chemical modification, as the 2VOMe G-, U-,
`C-, and A-modified apoB-1 contain 2, 5, 6, and 8 modified
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 13, No. 3, March 2006
`Copyright C The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`497
`
`

`

`ARTICLE
`
`doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.002
`
`FIG. 3. Selective 2VOMe modifications to siRNA duplexes abrogates cytokine induction in vivo. (A, C, E, F) Serum interferon-a and (B, D) TNF and IL-6 levels 6 h
`after intravenous administration of encapsulated (A, B) h-gal, (C, D) apoB-1, (E) apoB mismatch, and (F) vFLIP siRNA. Responses to unmodified (native) siRNA
`were compared to duplexes containing 2VOMe-modified U, G, or C residues in either the sense (S) or the antisense (AS) strands as indicated (see Table 1 for siRNA
`sequences). All mice received 40 Ag encapsulated siRNA. Values are means + SD from three or four animals. Lower levels of quantitation are 75 pg/ml for IFN-a,
`30 pg/ml for TNF, and 60 pg/ml for IL-6.
`
`498
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 13, No. 3, March 2006
`Copyright C The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`

`

`doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.002
`
`ARTICLE
`
`nucleotides in the sense strand, respectively. This suggests
`that unmodified U and/or G residues may play a key role in
`immune recognition of the duplex siRNA.
`To confirm that this approach to siRNA design would
`successfully inhibit inflammatory responses to siRNA in
`vivo, we assessed the immunostimulatory activity of the
`2VOMe-modified h-gal and apoB-1 siRNA in mice. Intra-
`venous administration of lipid-encapsulated h-gal (Figs.
`3A and 3B) or apoB-1 (Figs. 3C and 3D) siRNA containing
`2VOMe-modified guanosine or uridine residues in either
`sense or AS strands caused no detectable increase in
`serum IFN-a or inflammatory cytokines such as TNF. This
`was in marked contrast to the unmodified or cytosine-
`modified siRNA that induced substantial elevations in the
`level of these cytokines (Figs. 3C and 3D). We confirmed
`these striking effects of selective 2VOMe modification by
`applying a similar approach to modifying apoB mismatch
`[5] and vFLIP [29] siRNA sequences (see Table 1). For the
`apoB mismatch (Fig. 3E) and vFLIP siRNA duplexes (Fig.
`3F), modifying either the GU-rich regions or only the
`uridine residues in either one of the RNA strands
`completely abrogated cytokine induction by the siRNA
`duplex. Inhibition of the cytokine response to modified
`apoB mismatch siRNA was also confirmed in human
`PBMC cultures (Figs. 2B and 2C). As with apoB-1,
`selective incorporation of 2VOMe cytosine residues into
`vFLIP siRNA did not substantially reduce the IFN-a
`response (Fig. 3F). Thus far, we have consistently
`observed, for each siRNA sequence tested, that the
`introduction of 2VOMe uridine or guanosine residues
`has generated a noninflammatory duplex. Five additional
`examples are provided in Supplementary Figs. S2–S4.
`Taken together, these findings support the conclusion
`that the underlying mechanism for immune recognition
`of short RNA duplexes appears to be largely conserved
`between mouse and humans [17,18]. Our results indicate
`that this mechanism can be profoundly disrupted in
`either species by the incorporation of as few as 2 2VOMe
`
`modified nucleotides within either strand of the RNA
`duplex.
`
`Restricting Modifications to siRNA Sense Strand can
`Help Maintain RNAi Activity
`We assessed the gene silencing activity of native and
`2VOMe-modified apoB-1 siRNA in vitro. Unmodified
`apoB-1 encapsulated within liposomes caused potent,
`dose-dependent inhibition of apoB protein in HepG2
`cell culture supernatants (Fig. 4). Estimated IC50 values
`(~1.5 nM) were in agreement with those established for
`this siRNA sequence using Oligofectamine transfection
`in a similar in vitro model [5]. Modified apoB-1 duplexes
`in which 2VOMe modifications were restricted to the
`nontargeting sense, or passenger, strand displayed apoB
`silencing activity broadly similar to that of the native
`siRNA (Fig. 4). In contrast, modifications to the target-
`ing AS, or guide, strand severely impacted the RNAi
`activity of this duplex. Incorporation of 2VOMe uridine
`or guanosine residues in the AS strand abrogated apoB
`gene silencing, whereas the duplex containing the 5V-
`GUGUG-3V modified AS strand displayed substantially
`reduced activity compared to the native or sense
`modified duplexes (estimated IC50 ~15 nM). Unmodi-
`fied or modified apoB mismatch control siRNA yielded
`no significant inhibition of apoB protein expression
`(Fig. 4). A similar strategy of restricting 2VOMe mod-
`ifications to the sense strands of h-gal 728 and
`luciferase siRNA also proved successful
`in generating
`noninflammatory siRNA that retained full RNAi activity
`(Supplementary Figs. S3 and S4). Although frequently
`reported to occur, it is not yet possible to predict how a
`particular pattern of chemical modifications may neg-
`atively impact RNAi activity [18,23,25,26,28]. Consis-
`tent with our findings on apoB-1, 2VOMe modification
`to the AS strand of an siRNA duplex, particularly at the
`5V end, has been shown to reduce its RNAi activity [25].
`However, other groups have identified siRNA sequences
`
`FIG. 4. In vitro silencing of apoB expression by 2VOMe-
`modified siRNA. HepG2 cells were treated with
`encapsulated apoB-1 or mismatch siRNA at the
`indicated concentrations (0.6–45 nM). Unmodified
`(native) apoB-1 siRNA was compared to apoB-1
`duplexes containing 2VOMe-modified U, G, or C
`residues in the sense (S) strand or GU motif, U, or G
`residues in the antisense (AS) strand as indicated (see
`Table 1 for modified siRNA sequences). Unmodified
`and 2VOMe U(S) apoB mismatch siRNA served as
`control duplexes. ApoB protein in culture superna-
`tants was measured by ELISA after 48 h. ApoB levels
`are expressed as % of PBS-treated control cultures.
`Each value is derived from means of duplicate cultures
`and is representative of three separate experiments.
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 13, No. 3, March 2006
`Copyright C The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`499
`
`

`

`ARTICLE
`
`doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.002
`
`that can tolerate extensive 2VOMe modifications to the
`AS strand [8,23]. Our results suggest that selective 2VOMe
`modifications, restricted to the sense strand of siRNA,
`offer a robust approach to overcoming the problem of
`immune activation by siRNA while reducing the chance
`of negatively impacting RNAi activity. It is envisaged that
`this approach can be applied to many, if not all, siRNA
`sequences with inherent capacity to stimulate the innate
`immune response. In our experience, this would encom-
`pass the majority of conventionally designed synthetic
`siRNA.
`
`Potent RNAi Activity without Immune Stimulation
`in vivo
`We assessed 2VOMe-modified apoB-1 siRNA for their
`ability to silence gene expression in vivo. We selected
`2VOMe U(S)- and GU(AS)-modified apoB-1 as noninflam-
`matory duplexes (see Figs. 2 and 3). This also afforded the
`opportunity to assess the impact of chemical modifica-
`tions that reduced in vitro RNAi activity of the AS
`modified siRNA (see Fig. 4). We formulated native or
`2VOMe-modified apoB-1 and mismatch siRNA in SNALP,
`shown previously to deliver siRNA to the liver [9]. For use
`in systemic applications, nucleic acid-based drugs require
`stabilization or protection from nuclease degradation.
`Encapsulation inside the lipid bilayer protected unmodi-
`fied and otherwise labile siRNA from serum nuclease
`degradation for greater than 24 h at 378C in vitro,
`implying that encapsulation offers adequate nuclease
`protection without the need for extensive chemical
`modification to the siRNA. By comparison, naked siRNA
`was fully degraded within 4 h under similar conditions
`(Fig. 5).
`We administered encapsulated apoB siRNA intrave-
`nously to BALB/c mice at 5 mg/kg/day for 3 days. This
`regimen represents a 10-fold reduction in apoB-1 siRNA
`dose originally reported to be efficacious in experiments
`utilizing cholesterol-conjugated, chemically modified
`apoB-1 siRNA [5]. Animals receiving native, immunosti-
`mulatory apoB-1 or mismatch siRNA displayed overt
`symptoms of toxicity as evidenced by a loss of 10.5 and
`9% of initial body weight, respectively, by day 3 (Fig. 6A)
`and mild deterioration in general body condition during
`the course of treatment (not shown). In contrast, treat-
`ment with the 2VOMe-modified siRNA was well tolerated
`with minimal (less than 1%) or no body weight loss (Fig.
`6A). We confirmed abrogation of the innate cytokine
`response in these efficacy studies by in-life serum IFN-a
`analysis (Fig. 6B), and accordingly we attribute the
`toxicity associated with administration of the unmodi-
`fied siRNA to the systemic cytokine response. Of note,
`cytokine levels and body weight loss induced by unmodi-
`fied mismatch siRNA were lower than for the correspond-
`ing active apoB-1 duplex. The mismatch control in this
`case was generated by four G/C substitutions within the
`apoB-1 sequence [5], providing further evidence for the
`
`FIG. 5. Encapsulation of siRNA in lipid particles protects against serum
`nuclease degradation. Unmodified naked (top) or SNALP-encapsulated
`(middle) apoB-1 siRNA were incubated in 50% mouse serum at 378C. Duplex
`integrity was assessed at indicated time points by nondenaturing PAGE
`analysis. Addition of Triton X to disrupt lipid particle integrity (bottom)
`restored siRNA nuclease sensitivity.
`
`sequence-dependent effects on immune stimulation by
`RNA duplexes.
`As a direct measure of RNAi-mediated knockdown, we
`determined apoB mRNA in the liver 2 days after final
`siRNA treatment (Fig. 6C). In both the native and the
`2VOMe U(S)-modified apoB-1-treated groups, apoB mRNA
`levels were significantly reduced compared to PBS-treated
`animals (18 F 2 and 18 F 5% of PBS controls, respec-
`tively). By comparison, mice treated with 2VOMe GU(AS)-
`modified apoB-1 siRNA displayed less pronounced silenc-
`ing of apoB mRNA (44 F 4% of controls), which
`correlated with reduced in vitro RNAi activity of this
`modified siRNA (see Fig. 4). ApoB mRNA levels in the
`modified mismatch group were equivalent to those in
`PBS controls (Fig. 6C), while the native mismatch siRNA
`caused a modest reduction in apoB mRNA levels (79 F
`12% of PBS controls). The modest reduction in liver apoB
`mRNA observed with the native mismatch siRNA was
`apparent in three separate experiments (not shown) and
`correlated with interferon release and symptoms of
`toxicity associated with systemic administration and
`delivery of the unmodified siRNA.
`Silencing of apoB mRNA in the liver resulted in
`proportional, sequence-specific reductions in serum
`apoB protein. Mice treated with native, 2VOMe U(S)- or
`GU(AS)-modified apoB-1 siRNA had serum apoB protein
`levels that were 26, 28, and 47% those of the PBS-treated
`animals, respectively (Fig. 6D). Functional silencing of
`apoB expression was reflected in significant reductions
`in serum cholesterol that also correlated with the
`relative potency of mRNA and protein knockdown. Mice
`treated with native or 2VOMe U(S)- or GU(AS)-modified
`apoB-1 siRNA displayed serum cholesterol
`levels that
`were 48, 51, and 69% of cholesterol levels in the PBS
`control group (Fig. 6E). Neither mismatch siRNA had
`any effect on serum cholesterol (Fig. 6E). In separate
`experiments, the noninflammatory 2VOMe G(S)-modi-
`fied apoB-1 mediated similar reductions in apoB mRNA,
`
`500
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 13, No. 3, March 2006
`Copyright C The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`

`

`doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.002
`
`ARTICLE
`
`FIG. 6. Silencing of apoB expression in vivo without activation of the innate immune response. (A–E) In vivo effects following intravenous administration of
`encapsulated apoB-1 or mismatch siRNA in mice. Mice were treated on days 0, 1, and 2 with encapsulated unmodified (native) or 2VOMe U(S)- or GU(AS)-
`modified apoB-1 and native or 2VOMe U(S)-modified mismatch siRNA at 5 mg/kg per day. (A) Daily changes in body weight (% of day 0 weight) of apoB-1 (solid
`symbols) and mismatch (open symbols) siRNA-treated mice over the 4-day study period. (B) Serum IFN-a from test bleeds 6 h after initial treatment; lower level
`of quantitation 75 pg/ml. (C) apoB mRNA levels in liver, (D) apoB protein in serum, and (E) serum cholesterol (mM) 2 days after final siRNA treatment. C and D
`are expressed as % of apoB mRNA and apoB protein compared to PBS-treated animals. All values are means + SD of five animals. All data are representative of
`two separate experiments. Statistical significance versus PBS-treated animals: *P b 0.05, **P b 0.005, ***P b 0.00005; unpaired two-tailed t test on group values
`prior to normalization to PBS.
`
`MOLECULAR THERAPY Vol. 13, No. 3, March 2006
`Copyright C The American Society of Gene Therapy
`
`501
`
`

`

`ARTICLE
`
`doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.11.002
`
`protein, and serum cholesterol, in the absence of IFN
`induction (not shown).
`Results from these studies demonstrate that lipid
`encapsulation of siRNA provides adequate serum stabil-
`ity for systemic applications and negates the need for
`extensive chemical modifications to the RNA. This,
`coupled with the effective delivery of the siRNA pay-
`load to the target organ, in this case the liver, facilitates
`the silencing of endogenous genes. This is exemplified
`in these studies by apoB, a protein that represents a
`potential therapeutic target for hypercholesterolemia.
`Importantly, the 2VOMe-modified siRNA, designed to be
`noninflammatory, displayed potency in vivo that
`is
`equivalent to that of the unmodified siRNA but with-
`out the immunotoxicity and other off-target effects
`associated with the systemic administration of unmodi-
`fied siRNA. We believe that
`this approach will be
`generally applicable to a wide range of gene targets
`and shows great promise for use in a therapeutic
`setting.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Although naked siRNA can trigger RNA interference in
`vivo without apparent IFN induction [30], recent reports
`have shown that, when formulated with lipidic or
`polycation-based delivery systems, unmodified siRNA
`can be potent activators of the innate immune response
`[17–19]. TLR7, located within the endosomal compart-
`ment, has been implicated as the primary immune
`recognition pathway for siRNA [18] and this may, in
`part, explain why delivery vehicles that enter cells
`through the endosomal pathway can potentiate this
`response. Based on the finding that immune activation
`by siRNA is sequence dependent, we have shown
`previously that it is possible to design active siRNA with
`negligible immunostimulatory activity by selecting
`sequences that lack GU-rich motifs [17]. Although this
`strategy has proven successful, it significantly limits the
`number of novel siRNA sequences that can be designed
`against a given target. Furthermore, it currently requires
`some degree of screening due to the relatively ill-defined
`nature of putative RNA immunostimulatory motifs. In
`this report, we highlight a novel and robust approach to
`abrogating synthetic siRNA-mediated immune stimula-
`tion by selective incorporation of 2VOMe-modified
`nucleotides into the siRNA duplex. Remarkably, incorpo-
`ration of as few as two 2VOMe guanosine or uridine
`residues in highly immunostimulatory siRNA molecules
`completely abrogated siRNA-mediated interferon and
`inflammatory cytokine induction in human PBMC and
`in mice in vivo. This degree of chemical modification
`represents ~5% of the native 2V-OH positions in the siRNA
`duplex. Since complete abrogation of the immune
`response required only one of the RNA strands to be
`selectively modified, 2VOMe modifications could be
`
`restricted to the sense strand of the duplex, thereby
`minimizing the potential for attenuating the potency of
`the siRNA. These findings have provided a simple ration-
`ale for the synthesis of nonimmunostimulatory siRNA
`based on native sequences with proven RNAi activity. We
`demonstrate that by combining selectively modified
`siRNA with an effective systemic delivery vehicle, potent
`silencing of an endogenous gene target can be achieved
`in vivo at therapeutically viable doses without the
`deleterious side effects associated with systemic activa-
`tion of the innate immune response.
`It is unclear at present how the introduction of
`2VOMe nucleotides into siRNA prevents recognition of
`the duplex RNA by the immune system. Although there
`is evidence from gene-deficient mice that TLR7 is
`required for siRNA-mediated immune stimulation [18],
`the nature of the physical
`interaction between the
`receptor and the putative ligand is not known. This is
`also true for the defined TLR7/8 ligands that include
`guanosine analogues [31] and ssRNA containing GU or
`poly(U) motifs [11,12]. The mammalian immune system
`comprises a number of alternative signaling pathways
`that can also be activated by RNA species [10,32–35],
`and studies in cell lines suggest that siRNA may be a
`ligand for TLR3 [36] or dsRNA-dependent PKR [14,16]
`under certain conditions. Further work is therefore
`required to confirm the precise mechanism of siRNA-
`mediated immune activation before the molecular basis
`underlying the inhibitory effects of 2VOMe modification
`can be fully elucidated. Since the 2V-OH in the ribose
`backbone is a distinguishing feature of RNA, extensive
`chemical substitutions at this position may be antici-
`pated to disrupt recognition of the modified nucleic acid
`by an RNA binding receptor pathway. However, our
`studies show that 2VOMe-modified siRNA are rendered
`nonimmunostimulatory despite retaining up to 95% of
`their native ribonucleotides, including those comprising
`defined immunostimulatory regions of the RNA. 2VOMe
`is considered to be a relatively bulky chemical group at
`the 2V position that sits within the minor groove of an
`RNA duplex without significantly distorting its A-form
`helical structure [26,37]. This may be s

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket