throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 16
`Entered: December 20, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` ____________
`
`ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SILENCE THERAPEUTICS GMBH,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case PGR2018-000751 (Patent 9,783,802)
`Case PGR2018-00088 (Patent 9,790,505)
`Case PGR2018-00089 (Patent 9,790,501)
`____________
`
`
`Before JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI, JON B. TORNQUIST, and
`MONTÉ T. SQUIRE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SQUIRE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Granting Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding and
`Granting Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as
`Business Confidential Information
`35 U.S.C. § 327; 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.74
`
`
`1 We exercise our discretion to issue one order to be entered in all three
`cases. The parties are not authorized to use this style heading for subsequent
`papers without prior Board approval.
`
`

`

`PGR2018-00075 (Patent 9,783,802)
`PGR2018-00088 (Patent 9,790,505)
`PGR2018-00089 (Patent 9,790,501)
`
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`On December 18, 2018, with our prior authorization,2 Petitioner and
`Patent Owner (collectively referred to as “the Parties”) filed a joint motion
`to terminate in each of the above-referenced cases (“Joint Motions” or “Joint
`Mot.”). Paper 13.3 Along with the Joint Motions, the Parties filed a
`confidential Settlement and License Agreement (Exhibit 1087, “Settlement
`Agreement”), as well as joint requests to treat the Settlement Agreement as
`business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327(b) and 37
`C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (Paper 14 (“Joint Req.”)). The Parties represent that the
`filed copy of the Settlement Agreement is a true and correct copy. Joint
`Mot. 1.
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 327(a), post-grant review proceedings “shall be
`terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the
`petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of
`the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”
`In the Joint Motions, the Parties represent that they have entered into a
`settlement agreement. Joint Mot. 1. The Parties represent that their
`settlement agreement resolves all currently pending Office and District
`Court proceedings between them involving the patents at issue in these
`proceedings. Id. at 1–2. The Parties further represent that they have reached
`
`
`2 Filing of the Joint Motions was authorized via e-mail correspondence from
`Board personnel on December 17, 2018.
`3 The parties’ filed substantively similar papers and exhibits in each case.
`Unless otherwise noted, we cite to the papers and exhibit filed in PGR2018-
`00075 as representative.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`PGR2018-00075 (Patent 9,783,802)
`PGR2018-00088 (Patent 9,790,505)
`PGR2018-00089 (Patent 9,790,501)
`
`an agreement to jointly seek termination of these post-grant review
`proceedings. Id. at 2.
`These proceedings are at an early stage, and we have not yet decided
`whether to institute trials. In view of the early stage of these proceedings
`and the settlement between the Parties, we determine that good cause exists
`to terminate these proceedings with respect to the Parties.
`The Parties also filed a joint request in each case that the Settlement
`Agreement be treated as business confidential information and be kept
`separate from the file of the patent involved in the respective proceeding.
`Joint Req. 1. After reviewing the Settlement Agreement between Petitioner
`and Patent Owner, we find that the Settlement Agreement contains
`confidential business information regarding the terms of settlement. We
`determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement Agreement between
`Petitioner and Patent Owner as business confidential information pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 327(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`This paper does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`§ 328(a).
`
`III. ORDER
`Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is:
`ORDERED that the Parties’ joint motion to terminate each case
`(PGR2018-00075 (Paper 13), PGR2018-00088 (Paper 13), and PGR2018-
`00089 (Paper 13)) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties’ joint request to treat the
`Settlement Agreement as business confidential information in each case is
`granted;
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`PGR2018-00075 (Patent 9,783,802)
`PGR2018-00088 (Patent 9,790,505)
`PGR2018-00089 (Patent 9,790,501)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement shall be kept
`separate from the files of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,783,802, 9,790,505, and
`9,790,501, respectively, and made available only to Federal Government
`agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause,
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that post-grant review proceedings PGR2018-
`00075, PGR2018-00088, and PGR2018-00089 are each hereby terminated.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`PGR2018-00075 (Patent 9,783,802)
`PGR2018-00088 (Patent 9,790,505)
`PGR2018-00089 (Patent 9,790,501)
`
`PETITIONER:
`Scott K. Reed
`Prajakta A. Sonalker
`VENABLE LLP
`sreed@venable.com
`psonalker@venable.com
`AlnylamPTAB@venable.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Matthew I. Kreeger
`Jian Xiao
`MORRISION & FOERSTER LLP
`MKreeger@mofo.com
`JXiao@mofo.com
`68013-423-PGR@mofo.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket