throbber
7298–7307 Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, Vol. 38, No. 20
`doi:10.1093/nar/gkq621
`
`Published online 12 July 2010
`
`Solution-state structure of a fully alternately
`20-F/20-OMe modified 42-nt dimeric siRNA construct
`
`Peter Podbevsek1, Charles R. Allerson2, Balkrishen Bhat2 and Janez Plavec1,3,4,*
`
`1Slovenian NMR Center, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia,
`2Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Isis Phamaceuticals, Inc., 1896 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad CA 92008,
`USA, 3Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana and 4EN-FIST Center of
`Excellence, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
`
`Received May 5, 2010; Revised June 21, 2010; Accepted June 27, 2010
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A high-resolution solution structure of a stable 42-nt
`RNA dimeric construct has been derived based on a
`high number of NMR observables including nuclear
`overhauser effects (NOEs), J-coupling constants
`and residual dipolar couplings (RDCs), which were
`all obtained with isotopically unlabeled molecules.
`Two 21-nt siRNA that efficiently hybridize consist
`of ribose units that were alternately substituted by
`20-fluoro or 20-methoxy groups. Structure calcula-
`tions utilized a set of H-F RDC values for all
`21 20-fluoro modified nucleotides under conditions
`of weak alignment achieved by Pf1 phages. A com-
`pletely 20-F/20-OMe modified dimeric RNA construct
`adopts an antiparallel double-helical structure con-
`sisting of 19 Watson–Crick base pairs with addition-
`al 30 UU overhangs and a 50 phosphate group on the
`antisense strand. NMR data suggest that the stabil-
`ity of individual base pairs is not uniform throughout
`the construct. While most of the double helical
`segment exhibits well dispersed imino resonances,
`the last three base pairs either display uncharacter-
`istic chemical shifts of imino protons or absence of
`imino resonances even at
`lower
`temperatures.
`Accessibility of imino protons to solvent exchange
`suggests a difference in stability of duplex ends,
`which might be of importance for incorporation of
`the guide siRNA strand into a RISC.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`During recent years, it has become evident that small regu-
`latory RNAs play an important role in many biological
`processes including control of mechanisms directing gene
`
`expression and thus can be exploited for various thera-
`peutic purposes. An accidental discovery, which suggested
`that RNA can be used for silencing virtually any gene, has
`opened up a new field of gene therapy (1–5). The mech-
`anism, termed RNA interference (RNAi), is triggered by
`short RNA duplexes (6–8). Naturally occurring siRNAs
`are produced by enzymatic cleavage of a longer double
`stranded RNA molecule into shorter RNA duplexes.
`siRNAs are typically 21-nt long and contain 2-nt 30 over-
`hangs and 50 phosphates. Once in cells, siRNA associates
`with
`argonaute
`and
`other
`proteins
`forming
`an
`RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) (9). One strand
`of the siRNA duplex is degraded, while the other strand
`stays bound to the RISC and base pairs with a messenger
`RNA (mRNA) containing the complementary sequence.
`The proteins within RISC possess nuclease activity and
`cleave the target mRNA at a single site. Binding of
`RNA to a complementary region on its target mRNA
`leads to gene silencing by translational repression and/or
`mRNA degradation. This reduces the level of target
`mRNA in cells and effectively knocks down a specific
`gene.
`Since siRNAs can be artificially introduced into cells by
`various methods, RNAi has become a powerful tool for
`the regulation of gene expression. Unfortunately, the
`initial promises of the use of synthetic siRNAs consisting
`of solely standard nucleotides proved problematic. One of
`the main difficulties is the short half-life of unmodified
`RNA in serum due to the activity of endo- and exonucle-
`ases. In order to overcome the problem of instability
`against nuclease degradation, a variety of chemically
`modified nucleotides have been utilized in synthetic
`siRNAs (10–12). Earlier studies showed that the 20-OH
`group is not required for siRNAs to elicit an RNAi
`response (13). Therefore, the 20 position on the sugar
`moiety has been extensively modified. It has been shown
`that 20-O-methyl (20-OMe) (14) and 20-deoxy-20-fluoro
`
`*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +386 1 4760353; Fax: +386 1 4760300; Email: janez.plavec@ki.si
`Present address:
`Balkrishen Bhat, Regulus Therapeutics, 1896 Rutherford Road, Carlsbad CA 92008, USA.
`
`ß The Author(s) 2010. Published by Oxford University Press.
`This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
`by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
`
`

`

`(20-F) (15) modifications (Figure 1) increase the nuclease
`stability of siRNAs, and at the same time retain its RNAi
`activity. Second generation antisense oligonucleotides
`incorporating these 20-modifications exhibit high binding
`affinity to the target RNA, enhanced metabolic stability,
`and improved pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles (16).
`Several reports have discussed different extents of substi-
`tution with modified nucleotides ranging from just a single
`nucleotide to the use of uniform modification along both
`strands (12).
`Recently, Bhat and coworkers identified a highly potent
`siRNA duplex, which targets the B site of the human
`phosphatase and tensin homolog mRNA, which was pre-
`viously shown to be a target for degradation using the
`siRNA approach (17). The fully modified duplex, which
`is comprised of alternating 20-F and 20-OMe nucleotides
`exhibits several desirable pharmacokinetic properties (18).
`The melting temperature of the modified duplex is 20C
`higher in comparison to an unmodified RNA oligonucleo-
`tide. High thermal stability is, at least in part, responsible
`for the significantly higher plasma stability observed in the
`modified siRNA. Consequently, 20-F/20-OMe siRNA
`showed a more than a 500-fold increase in in vitro
`potency versus unmodified siRNA (18,19).
`20-modifications can influence the sugar conformation
`to adopt a predominantly North-type (N) sugar pucker,
`and can also improve properties such as affinity (20–24).
`20-modifications that provide a gauche effect and/or a
`charge effect can play a significant role in the level of
`nuclease resistance. Interplay of stereoelectronic effects,
`sequence, hydration or metal ion interactions can influ-
`ence equilibrium between canonical A- and B-type
`duplex and other conformations.
`The focus of the current study is on a 42-nt dimeric
`RNA construct which consists of 19 Watson–Crick base
`pairs, 30 UU overhangs in both strands, which are found
`
`Figure 1. Schematic representation of 20-deoxy-20-fluoro (left) and
`20-OMe (right) substituted ribose units in the preferred N-type sugar
`conformation.
`
`Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, Vol. 38, No. 20 7299
`
`in naturally occurring siRNAs, and a 50 phosphate on the
`antisense strand, which is required for the correct pos-
`itioning within the RISC (Figure 2). We attempt to
`analyze conformational preorganization of the two 21-nt
`RNAs separately and after hybridization into the dimeric
`construct by solution state NMR without the use of 13C
`and 15N isotope labeling. Structural characterization of
`the dimeric construct provides molecular details which
`correlate with the high potency of the modified siRNA.
`Overall topology and details of the 3D structure of the
`fully 20-F/20-OMe modified siRNA duplex together with
`the dynamics of individual segments offer deeper insights
`into structural features as well as the role of 30 overhangs.
`At the outset, we expected to observe differences in duplex
`stability that would be localized to the specific section of
`the construct. Contiguous base pairs in the 50 seed region
`and near the cleavage site are important for nuclease
`activity (25,26). Disruption of
`the helical duplex
`geometry may be important for intermolecular inter-
`actions of a RNA complex with its complementary
`region on a target mRNA which is at the heart of gene
`silencing by translational repression or degradation.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Sample preparation and NMR data collection
`
`The NMR sample was prepared by dissolving the oligo-
`nucleotides ISIS 401156 (50-GGGUAAAUACAUUCUU
`CAUUU-30) and ISIS 401157 (P-50-AUGAAGAAUGUA
`UUUACCCUU-30) in a 100% 2H2O or 5% 2H2O, 95%
`H2O aqueous solution containing 20 mM NaCl and
`20 mM sodium
`phosphate
`buffer
`(pH = 6.8).
`Oligonucleotide concentration in the NMR sample was
`2.0 mM per strand. The sample used to measure residual
`dipolar couplings (RDCs) was prepared by redissolving
`the NMR sample in a 100% 2H2O filamentous Pf1
`phage solution (Asla Ltd). The total phage concentration
`was 17 mg/ml which resulted in a deuterium splitting of
`17.1 Hz at 800 MHz. 1D 1H and 2D NOESY, DQF-COSY
`and TOCSY NMR spectra were recorded on Varian
`VNMRS 800 MHz spectrometer equipped with a cold
`probe. DPFGSE water suppression scheme was used for
`suppression of the water signal. 2D HP-COSY spectra
`were recorded on a Varian VNMRS 600 MHz spectrom-
`eter with a penta probe. All experiments were performed
`on a natural abundance sample at temperatures ranging
`from 0 to 35C. NMR spectra were processed and
`
`Figure 2. Base pairing pattern of the 20-F/20-OMe modified sense/passenger and antisense/guide RNA strands. 20-F and 20-OMe modified nucleotides
`are depicted in green and blue, respectively. The base paired segments of the strands that displayed observable imino resonances are shaded in red.
`
`

`

`7300 Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, Vol. 38, No. 20
`
`analyzed using VNMRJ (Varian Inc.) and Sparky
`software (UCSF).
`
`No other deviations in the two final families of structures
`could be observed.
`
`Tm measurement
`
`A solution for measuring the thermal stability of the
`fully-modified duplex was prepared by combining equal
`volumes of 8 mM solutions of each oligonucleotide in a
`buffer of 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate
`(pH 7) and 0.1 M EDTA, yielding final concentration
`of 4 mM duplex. A Cary 100 Bio spectrophotometer with
`the Cary Win UV Thermal program was used to measure
`absorbance versus temperature. The solution was heated
`at 0.5C/min from 15 to 95C (repeated in triplicate), and
`Tm was determined from the A260 versus temperature
`curve.
`
`Structure calculations
`
`Structure calculations were performed using AMBER 9
`software with the parmbsc0 force field (27). Force field
`parameters for the modified nucleotides were used from
`previous studies (28,29). Initial starting structure was
`created using the InsightII software. The structure was
`then subjected to 100 ps of NMR restrained simulated an-
`nealing (SA) calculations using a generalized Born implicit
`solvation model. For each SA calculation a random
`starting velocity was used. For the first 15 ms the mol-
`ecules were held at a constant temperature of 300 K. The
`molecules were then heated to 1000 K in the next 10 ps,
`after which temperature was constant for 25 ps, scaled
`down to 100 K in the next 25 ps and reduced to 0 K in
`the
`last
`25 ps.
`The
`force
`constants
`were
`1 A˚ 2 for nuclear overhauser effect (NOE)
`35 kcal mol
`2
`1 rad
`for
`torsion angle and
`distance, 300 kcal mol
`1 A˚ 2 for base planarity restraints. Direct
`25 kcal mol
`dipolar HF coupling restraints were used to define the
`five unique elements of the alignment tensor. In the
`AMBER software, these elements are treated as additional
`variables and are optimized along with the structural par-
`ameters. The variables used are the Cartesian components
`of the alignment tensor in the axis system defined by the
`molecule itself. The alignment tensor was fitted to the
`starting structure, and the tensor obtained from this
`fitting was used as the initial guess for further refinement.
`The cutoff for non-bonded interactions was 20 A˚ . The
`SHAKE algorithm for hydrogen atoms was used with a
`tolerance of 0.0005 A˚ . All structures from SA were sub-
`jected to a maximum of 10 000 steps of steepest descent
`minimization. A family of 10 minimized structures with
`the lowest energy and the smallest NMR violations were
`selected for further analysis. Helical parameters were
`determined with 3DNA 2.0 software (30). We have also
`performed the structural calculations without the use of
`base planarity restraints. The convergence and overall
`RMSD of the final structures were comparable to the
`original set of structures. Analysis of local base-pair par-
`ameters showed that the average propeller twist changed
`from 6.7 (SD 0.6, maximum deviation per base pair 3.7)
`to 10.1 (SD 1.2, maximum deviation per base pair 7.0)
`with and without base planarity restraints, respectively.
`
`Coordinate deposition
`
`The coordinates for the family of the 10 lowest energy
`structures of the 20-F/20-OMe modified dimeric 42-nt con-
`struct have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with
`the accession code 2KWG.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Single-strand preorganization
`Solutions of individual 20-F/20-OMe modified 21-nt RNA
`oligonucleotides were prepared in 5% 2H2O, 95% H2O
`and transferred into NMR tubes. 1D 1H NMR spectrum
`of the sense strand exhibits three imino resonances at 15C
`(Figure 3A and B). The resonance at d12.4 p.p.m. reveals a
`slightly broader width at half-height in comparison to the
`remaining two resonances and undergoes
`significant
`broadening upon lowering the temperature to 0C. The
`chemical
`shifts of
`the two sharp imino resonances
`suggest the formation of one AU and one GC base pair.
`Imino–imino cross-peak in NOESY spectrum (data not
`shown) indicates that the two base pairs are adjacent.
`The base pairing pattern can be associated with one of
`the topologies suggested by the MFOLD program (31)
`(Figure 3A). No NOESY cross-peaks at d12.4 p.p.m.
`could be observed due to the broad nature of resonance
`signal.
`Five imino resonances in the range from d11.0 to
`14.0 p.p.m. could be observed in the 1D 1H NMR
`spectrum of the antisense strand at 15C (Figure 3C and
`D). On the basis of chemical shifts, the two upfield imino
`resonances were assigned to a GU base pair, which was
`confirmed by the strong NOESY imino–imino cross-peak
`between them. The GU base pair is adjacent to an AU
`base pair with its imino proton resonating at d14.0 p.p.m.
`The two remaining resonances at d13.1 and 13.2 p.p.m.
`exhibit a NOESY cross-peak between each other, but no
`cross-peaks to other imino protons. The resonances at
`d13.1 and 13.2 p.p.m. correspond to adjacent AU and
`GC base pairs, respectively. The base pairing pattern
`could be linked to one of the topologies suggested by
`the MFOLD program (31) (Figure 3C).
`
`Dimeric construct exhibits well resolved NMR signals
`Equimolar amounts of the two 20-F/20-OMe modified
`21-nt RNA oligonucleotides in 5% 2H2O, 95% H2O
`were transferred into an NMR tube. 1D 1H 800 MHz
`NMR spectrum exhibited sharp and well resolved reson-
`ances (Figure 4). Seventeen imino resonances could be
`identified in the region from d11.5 to 14.2 p.p.m.
`indicating Watson–Crick base pairing, which suggests
`the formation of a single double helical structure. A
`second sample of equimolar amounts of the 20-F/20-OMe
`oligonucleotides was prepared in phosphate buffer
`solution, and was used to measure the thermal hybridiza-
`tion stability (Tm) of
`the resulting duplex. A single
`81.7C,
`hyperchromic
`transition was observed at
`
`

`

`Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, Vol. 38, No. 20 7301
`
`Figure 3. Base pairing pattern of the sense (A) and antisense (C) strands and the corresponding 1D 1H NMR spectra of individual sense (B) and
`antisense (D) strands recorded at 15C.
`
`Figure 4. 1D 1H NMR spectrum of the dimeric RNA construct recorded at 25C. Imino region with the assignment of resonances is shown in the
`inset.
`
`

`

`7302 Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, Vol. 38, No. 20
`
`confirming the formation of a single base paired species.
`Detailed temperature-dependent NMR measurements
`were used to assess the local thermal stability of individual
`base pairs. The NMR melting profiles in temperature
`range from 25 to 80C reveal that the melting of the
`duplex is not uniform and that base pairs located in the
`labile segment of the helix exhibit noticeably lower melting
`temperatures in comparison to the rest of the construct
`(Supplementary Figure S1). U15, U16 and G24 imino
`proton resonances which are resolved throughout the tem-
`perature range can be observed at temperatures of up to
`55C. On the other hand, G27 imino proton, which con-
`stitutes the next base pair is observed at temperatures of
`up to 70C. Other imino resonances cannot be uniquely
`identified due to distinct temperature variation of their
`chemical shift and severe spectral overlap. They can be
`temperatures of up to 65C.
`observed, however, at
`Interestingly, some imino peaks are observed even at
`80C.
`the imino resonances was possible
`Assignment of
`through the imino–imino sequential walk in 2D NOESY
`spectra (Figure 5). The imino peaks indicated the forma-
`tion of continuous Watson–Crick base pairs between
`G1-C40 and U16-A25 pairs. The additional C17 G24
`base pair was inferred through the observation of G24
`imino proton at the chemical shift of d11.5 p.p.m. This
`chemical shift of a GC Watson–Crick base pair suggests
`specific stacking interactions or other structural features at
`the end of a perfectly hydrogen bonded double helix. The
`imino proton of a GC base pair flanked by a UA base pair
`at the 50 end and an AU base pair at the 30 end could be
`shielded by over 2 p.p.m. in an A-RNA helix (32). It is
`noteworthy, that the signal intensity and the half-width of
`the G24 imino proton is comparable to other imino
`signals. No imino proton resonances could be detected
`
`the 2D NOESY spectrum
`Figure 5. The imino–imino region of
`(tm = 250 ms, 15C). Lines represent the sequential walk for the base
`paired region (G1-C17 and G24-C40).
`
`for hypothetical A18 U23 and U19 A22 base pairs at tem-
`peratures as low as 0C.
`
`Assignment of resonances
`
`Assignment of imino protons, which established second-
`ary structure was followed by more detailed assignment of
`non-exchangeable protons (33,34). Pyrimidine H5 protons
`were identified with the use of 2D DQF-COSY spectra
`showing through bond correlations with aromatic H6
`protons of the same residue. Cytosine H5 protons ex-
`hibited strong intranucleotide NOESY correlations with
`amino protons, which in turn showed NOE cross-peaks to
`base paired guanine imino protons. Adenine H2 reson-
`ances were assigned through their strong NOE correl-
`ations with base paired uracil imino protons. Sequential
`aromatic (H6/H8)-sugar H10 connectivities could be
`traced through the whole length of both sense and anti-
`sense strands (Figure 6), which enabled us to assign all
`aromatic and anomeric protons. However, this was done
`with the help of HF couplings which could be observed in
`the 2D NOESY spectra. Specifically, scalar couplings of F
`with H10 helped us to identify sugar protons belonging to
`nucleotides with the 20-F modification. H20 protons of all
`20-F substituted nucleotides and cca 50% of the H30 res-
`onances of 20-F substituted nucleotides could be assigned
`due to their coupling with fluorine nuclei. Only a few H20
`protons of 20-OMe substituted nucleotides could be
`assigned. 20-OMe proton resonances (in the region from
`d3.3 to 3.9 p.p.m.) were assigned by their intra- and
`internucleotide correlations with aromatic protons. 2D
`DQF-COSY spectrum showed no H10-H20 cross-peaks
`indicating that the sugar conformations of all nucleotides
`1H
`adopted predominantly N-type puckering. The
`chemical
`shift values have been deposited in the
`Biological Magnetic Resonance data Bank (BMRB, acces-
`sion no. 16852).
`
`Restraints and structure calculations
`
`NOE distance restraints for non-exchangeable protons
`were obtained from 2D NOESY spectra recorded at
`25C in 100% 2H2O with mixing times ranging from 80
`to 250 ms. The volume of
`the pyrimidine H5-H6
`cross-peak was used as the distance reference (2.45 A˚ ).
`NOE distance restraints for exchangeable protons were
`obtained from 2D DPFGSE NOESY spectra recorded
`at 25C in 5% 2H2O, 95% H2O with mixing time of
`250 ms. Cross-peaks were classified as strong (1.8–3.6 A˚ ),
`medium (2.6–5.0 A˚ ) and weak (3.5–6.5 A˚ ).
`Torsion angle restraints for a and z were set to 0 ± 120
`to exclude trans conformations inferred from the narrow
`range of 31P resonances. Torsion angles " were restrained
`to 235 ± 65 to exclude the unfavorable gauche+ conform-
`ation. Torsion angles b were restrained to 180 ± 40
`(trans) due to the lack of P-H50 and P-H500 cross-peaks
`in HP-COSY spectrum. The backbone torsion angle re-
`straints (a, b, " and z) were used only for the base paired
`region (G1-C17, G24-C40). Due to the absence of H10-H20
`cross-peaks in 2D DQF-COSY spectra, which indicate an
`N-type sugar pucker, torsion angles d of all nucleotides
`were restrained to 85 ± 30. All torsion angles  were
`
`

`

`Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, Vol. 38, No. 20 7303
`
`Figure 6. The aromatic–anomeric region of the 2D NOESY spectrum (tm = 150 ms, 25C). Lines represent the sequential walk for the sense,
`G1-U21 (A) and antisense, A22-U42 (B) strands, which are shown separately to reduce overlap.
`
`restrained to 120 ± 90 (anti) based on the intensity of
`intraresidual H6/H8-H10 NOESY cross-peaks.
`The above NOE distance and torsion angle restraints
`were complemented by the implementation of HF residual
`dipolar coupling constants (35). The fluorine nucleus
`(placed on every other nucleotide) is coupled to H10, H20
`and H30 sugar protons. Coupling constants were obtained
`by measuring the HF splittings, which are observable in
`traces of H10-H20 and H20-aromatic cross-peaks
`in
`NOESY spectra. Two bond F-H20 splittings are in the
`range from 42.8 to 53.8 Hz and three bond F-H10 splittings
`are between 12.1 and 18.8 Hz. After the addition of the Pf1
`phages, the splittings were measured again and the RDC
`values were calculated. We were able to collect F-H10 and
`F-H20 RDC values for all 21 nt, which are 20-F modified.
`Measured RDC vales range from 0.7 to 5.2 Hz for F-H20
`
`and from 0.1 to 3.0 Hz for F-H10 coupled pair. F-H30
`splittings were observed in NOESY spectra and are in the
`range from 25 to 30 Hz. However, F-H30 RDCs could not
`be determined with sufficient accuracy due to the unreli-
`the F-H30 splitting and severe
`able measurement of
`spectral overlap which limited assignment of H30 protons.
`Finally, 311 NOE restraints, 219 torsion angles and 42
`RDCs were used in the structure calculation process
`(Table 1). Forty hydrogen bond and 34 bp planarity re-
`straints were used for the 17 AU and GC base pairs. No
`hydrogen bond and planarity restraints were used for the
`hypothetical A18 U23 and U19 A22 base pairs, for which
`no imino signals could be observed.
`A set of 100 structures was calculated using SA protocol
`and energy minimization, from which the 10 lowest energy
`structures were selected. The final set of 10 structures
`
`

`

`7304 Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, Vol. 38, No. 20
`
`Table 1. Structural statistics
`
`NOE-derived distance restraints
`Intranucleotide NOEs
`Sequential NOEs
`Long-range NOEs
`Torsion angle restraints
`Hydrogen bond restraints
`Base pair planarity restraints
`Residual dipolar couplings
`NOE violations >0.3 A˚
`Deviations from idealized covalent geometry
`Bonds (A˚ )
`Angles ()
`Pairwise heavy atom RMSD (A˚ )
`Overall
`Without UU overhangs (1–19, 22–40)
`Only the base paired region (1–17, 24–40)
`
`135
`151
`25
`219
`40
`34
`42
`0
`
`0.010 ± 0.000
`2.48 ± 0.02
`
`2.29
`1.78
`1.54
`
`Figure 7. (A) The lowest energy structure of the 20-F/20-OMe modified
`dimeric 42-nt RNA construct. Nucleotides G1-U16 and A25-C40 are
`depicted in blue, base pair C17 G24 is in yellow and base pairs A18
`U23 and U19 A22 are in orange. (B) Superposition of the 10 lowest
`energy structures of the 42-nt construct. Sense and antisense strands are
`in blue and red, respectively.
`
`exhibits a pairwise heavy atom RMSD of 2.3 A˚ , while the
`base paired region (G1-C17, G24-C40) alone displays a
`RMSD of 1.5 A˚ . The construct adopts an A-type double
`helical structure (Figure 7) with an average rise and twist
`parameters of 2.9 A˚ and 30.5, respectively. For compari-
`son, the rise and twist parameters in standard A-type
`RNA are 2.8 A˚ and 32.8, respectively (36).
`
`Figure 8. Superposition of the 10 lowest energy structures of the U20,
`U21 overhang over the U19 A22 base pair.
`
`Perusal of the structures shown in Figure 7 shows the
`formation of 19 Watson–Crick base pairs in the stem
`region (G1-U19 and A22-C40).
`Interestingly,
`imino
`proton signals of A18-U23 and U19-A22 base pairs have
`not been observed experimentally. In accordance, the
`structure of these two terminal base pairs is less well
`defined, due to the lack of a hydrogen bond, base
`planarity and backbone torsion angle restraints. All
`20-OMe groups in the stem region are rotated towards
`the minor groove. The structure of the U20 and U21
`overhang in the sense strand is not well defined.
`However,
`in all 10 final structures U20 stacks on the
`terminal A19 U22 base pair and in several structures
`U21 stacks on U20 (Figure 8). On the other hand, the
`U41 and U42 overhang in the antisense strand does not
`stack on the terminal G1 C40 base pair, instead, 20-OMe
`group of C40 is positioned above its pyrimidine ring and
`blocks stacking of U41. As a result, the U41 and U42
`overhang is poorly defined and does not adopt a well
`defined structure.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Short synthetic oligonucleotides can be used to specifically
`modulate gene expression through the RNA interference
`(RNAi) mechanism. However, the use of such molecules
`in vivo did not bring expected results, partly due to the low
`nuclease stability of siRNA oligonucleotides originating
`from natural nucleotides. Several chemical modifications
`on
`the
`ribose
`ring were
`shown
`to
`improve
`pharmacokinetic properties of synthetic oligonucleotides
`without causing toxicity, which is crucial for delivery of
`such molecules into living organisms. A completely 20-F/
`20-OMe modified dimeric RNA construct was previously
`shown to be a highly potent RNAi trigger in HeLa cells
`(18). In the current study, we present a 3D structure of a
`42-nt dimeric alternately 20-F/20-OMe modified construct
`consisting of a Watson–Crick base paired duplex with
`additional 30 UU overhangs and a 50 phosphate group
`on the antisense strand, which mimics naturally occurring
`siRNAs produced in cells by the Dicer enzyme.
`The two 21-nt oligos efficiently hybridize thus forming
`an A-type double helix with 30 UU overhangs on both
`strands. The helical segment is completely complementary
`
`

`

`and exhibits 19 Watson–Crick base pairs. The overall
`thermal stability of the duplex, reflected by a Tm of
`81.7C, is not appreciably different from the stability of
`an identical duplex lacking the 30 UU overhangs, with a
`previously reported Tm of 82.0C (18). However, NMR
`data suggests that the stability of individual base pairs is
`not uniform throughout the entire length of the construct.
`Most of the double helix (G1-U16, A25-C40), apart from
`the last three base pairs, exhibits well dispersed imino res-
`onances in the Watson–Crick region of NMR spectra.
`However,
`the last 3 bp display somewhat different
`properties. G24 imino proton exhibits a chemical shift of
`d11.5 p.p.m., which is uncharacteristic for imino protons
`involved in GC Watson–Crick base pairs. Interestingly,
`the line-width of
`this signal
`is comparable to other
`imino resonances in the Watson–Crick region. U19 and
`U23 imino resonances involved in AU base pairs could
`not be observed in NMR spectra even after lowering the
`temperature to 0C, which clearly indicates that these
`imino protons are accessible
`to solvent
`exchange.
`Differences in stability of helix segments can be attributed
`to the base pair composition of the construct, which ends
`with two AU base pairs on one end and with three GC
`base pairs on the opposite end. Our findings are in agree-
`ment with previous reports, which suggest that a differ-
`ence in stability of duplex ends is required for the
`incorporation of the correct siRNA strand into RISC
`(37,38).
`During the RISC assembly process, the RISC-loading
`complex loads the siRNA duplex into Ago2 (39). The 50
`end of the guide strand is inserted into the phosphate
`binding pocket of the Ago2 PIWI domain and serves as
`a template for target mRNA recognition. The passenger
`strand is subsequently cleaved by Ago2 and ejected from
`the RISC complex. Guide and passenger strands are
`determined on the basis of relative stabilities of helix
`ends (37,38). The helix end that is less stable interacts
`with the PIWI domain of Ago2, which results in the un-
`winding of the first base pair (40,41). The strand whose 50
`end is at the less stable end of the helix becomes the guide
`strand, while the other strand becomes the passenger
`strand. Our data show a clear difference in the relative
`stability of helix ends. The labile base pairs A18 U23
`and U19 A22 suggest that the A22–U42 strand will serve
`as a guide strand and will thus control the incorporation
`of the siRNA duplex into the RISC complex.
`Although one end of the helix is less stable, the existence
`of fraying ends in solution can be dismissed due to the
`presence of
`several
`inter-strand NOE cross-peaks
`correlating aromatic and sugar protons between U20
`and A22 (Supplementary Figure S2). All
`structures
`exhibit A18 U23 and
`obtained by SA simulations
`U19 A22 base pairs, despite the absence of hydrogen
`bond restraints for these base pairs. Stabilization of
`these base pairs is probably achieved through favorable
`stacking interactions. Furthermore, the U20 and U21
`overhang in the sense strand stacks efficiently on the
`terminal U19 A22 base pair.
`On the other hand, there is poor, if any, base–base
`stacking of the U41 and U42 overhang on the terminal
`GC base pair in the antisense strand. The stacking of U41
`
`Nucleic Acids Research, 2010, Vol. 38, No. 20 7305
`
`is prevented by the 20-OMe group of C40, which is pos-
`itioned directly above the aromatic ring of C40. As a
`result, the structure of the U41, U42 overhang is poorly
`defined. This appears to have no effect on the terminal GC
`base pair. Apart from the G1 imino proton signal being
`slightly broader at 25C, which is expected due to its
`exposure to exchange processes at the helix end, there is
`no indication of exchange of hydrogen bonded imino
`protons with solvent in the rest of the helix (G1-U16,
`A25-C40).
`For comparison, preliminary measurements on the
`native isosequential siRNA were performed. The native
`analogue displays similar features to the 20-F/20-OMe
`modified siRNA. Very good dispersion of the imino
`proton
`chemical
`shifts
`has
`been
`observed
`(Supplementary Figures S3 and S4). As expected, the
`G24 imino proton exhibits an upfield chemical shift due
`to its position between UA and AU base pairs. However,
`a large part of the aromatic and anomeric proton reson-
`ances is condensed in highly overlapped regions, which
`precludes further analysis with an isotopically unlabeled
`RNA sample of this molecular weight (Supplementary
`Figure S5). It is noteworthy that DQF-COSY spectrum
`showed no cross-peaks in H10-H20 region, which is indica-
`tive of N-type sugar conformation.
`All nucleotides in the construct exhibit a predominantly
`N-type sugar pucker, which is usually found in RNA mol-
`ecules. This is partly due to the presence of 20 modifica-
`tions, which favor the C30-endo conformation of the sugar
`ring (20–22). The RNA like
`conformation greatly
`improves the binding affinity for the target RNA, which
`is desired for synthetic siRNA oligonucleotides. It is not
`surprising that the introduction of 20-fluoro and 20-OMe
`modifications does not have any significant impact on the
`structure of the construct. Deviations from the native
`A-type RNA structure could reduce the efficiency of the
`RNAi mechanism. The alternating 20-F/20-OMe motif
`appears to be a promising design for synthetic siRNA
`oligonucleotides with high serum stability.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`A high-resolution structure of the stable 42-nt RNA
`dimeric construct has been derived based on a high
`number
`of NMR observables
`including NOEs,
`J-coupling constants and RDCs. It is amazing that suffi-
`cient resolution of NMR signals was achieved on an
`800 MHz NMR spectrometer which enabled sequential
`assignment of a 14 kDa dimer without isotope labeling.
`The two 21-nt oligos efficiently hybridized thus forming
`an A-type double helix with 30 UU overhangs on both
`strands. Ribose units in siRNA construct were alternately
`substituted by a 20-deoxy-20-fluoro or 20-methoxy groups
`which contributed to the stabilization of the N-type sugar
`conformation that is typically associated with structure of
`A-form of RNA. Structure calculations utilized a set of
`H-F RDC values under conditions of weak alignment
`achieved by Pf1 phages for all 21 nt, which were 20-F
`modified. A completely 20-F/20-OMe modified dimeric
`RNA construct adopts an

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket