throbber
Scientific Abstracts
`
`Saturday, 14 june 2014
`
`781
`
`in the others. We also evaluate the usefulness of procalcitonin for differentiating
`diagnosis between acute gout arthritis and bacterial infection.
`Methods: The serum samples were obtained from 67 patients with acute gout
`arthritis and 90 age-matched patients with bacterial infection. Serum procalcitonin
`levels were measured by an enzyme-linked fluorescent assay.
`Results: The serum procalcitonin levels in patients with acute gouty arthritis were
`significantly lower than those in patients with bacterial
`infection (0.096±0.105
`ng/mL vs 4.941±13.763 ng/mL, p =0.001). However, other inflammatory param-
`eters, such as ESR, CRP and WBC, showed no significant differences between
`these two groups. Patients with acute gout arthritis had statistically higher serum
`uric acid levels than the patients with bacterial
`infection (7.62±2.03 mg/dL vs
`5.19±2.36 mg/dL, p<0.001); however, 19.4% (13/67) among the acute gout
`arthritis group had lower uric acid level (below 6.0 mg/dL). To determine the
`discriminative ability of procalcitonin between acute gout arthritis and bacterial
`infection, we conducted ROC analysis about procalcitonin, uric acid, ESR, CRP
`and WBC. The area under the curve (AUC) of procalcitonin and uric acid were
`0.852 (95% CI 0.793-0.911, p<0.001) and 0.808 (95% CI 0.738-878, p<0.001),
`respectively. There was no significance at ESR, CRP and WBC. With a cut off
`value of 0.095 ng/dL, the sum of sensitivity and specificity of procalcitonin were
`the highest (80.0% and 80.6%, respectively).
`Conclusions: Serum procalcitonin levels were significantly lower in patient with
`acute gout arthritis than in patients with bacterial infection. The serum procalcitonin
`level is expected to be a useful serologic marker for the differentiating acute gout
`arthritis from bacterial infection.
`References:
`[1] Simon L et al. Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers
`of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis
`2004:39:206-17.
`Disclosure of Interest: None declared
`DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4127
`
`SAT0524 PREDICTORS OF A CLINICAL RESPONSE TO
`BISPHOSPHONATES TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH
`COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME TYPE I
`M. Manara, A. Becciolini, F. Rovelli, F. Zucchi, L. Sinigaglia, M. Varenna.
`Rheumatology Department, Gaetano Pini Institute, Milan, Italy
`Background: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type I (CRPS-I) is a painful
`condition which can lead to potential disability. The efficacy of Bisphosphonates
`(BPS) treatment in this syndrome has been demonstrated in trials in which
`different types and dosages of BPS were investigated1,2.
`Objectives: Aim of the study was to identify variables predictive of a clinical
`response to BPS treatment in a large cohort of subjects with CRPS-I.
`Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with CRPS-I referred to our Unit
`in the last 5 years for a treatment with intravenous BPS (Neridronate 100 mg
`for 4 infusions, Pamidronate 60 mg for 4 infusions or Clodronate 300 mg for 10
`infusions) was performed. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of CRPS-I according
`to Budapest criteria3 were included when follow up data were available. Baseline
`variables (demographic characteristics, CRPS-I site, predisposing event, duration
`of symptoms before BPS treatment,
`type of BPS used, associated clinical
`manifestations, imaging) and outcome measures (pain values) were collected.
`A clinical response to the treatment was defined as a reduction in pain on a
`Visuo-Analogic Scale (VAS) higher than 50% compared to baseline at 45-60 days
`from the beginning of the treatment4.
`Results: A total of 172 patients were included in the study, with a mean (SD) age
`of 56.7 (13.8) years. Among them, 116 (67.4%) were treated with Neridronate,
`47 (27.3%) with Pamidronate and 9 (5.2%) with Clodronate. A clinical response
`to the treatment was observed in 123 (71.5%) patients. Subjects responding to
`the treatment had a shorter duration of symptoms [median (IQR): 3 (2,5) vs
`5 (2,7); p=0.000] and showed more frequently inflammatory signs (92.7% vs
`69.8%; p=0.000). A fracture as predisposing event was more likely to be found
`in responders (53.7% vs 30.6%, p=0.006). The treatment with amino-BPS was
`associated with a higher frequency of response than Clodronate treatment (73%
`vs 44.4%; p=0.065). At multivariate analysis a “warm” inflammatory phase of the
`disease [OR (95%CI): 4.57 (1.59, 13.15)] and a fracture as predisposing event
`[OR (95%CI): 3 (1.20, 7.52)] were associated with increased odds of response to
`the treatment.
`Conclusions: The treatment of CRPS-I with intravenous BPS is more likely to be
`effective when established in an early “warm” phase of the disease. Subjects with
`a previous fracture may represent a subset of patients with a higher chance to
`benefit from BPS treatment.
`References:
`[1] Brunner F, Schmid A, Kissling R, Held U, Bachmann LM. Biphosphonates for
`the therapy of complex regional pain syndrome I - systematic review. Eur J
`Pain. 2009;13:17-21.
`[2] Varenna M, Adami S, Rossini M, Gatti D, Idolazzi L, Zucchi F, Malavolta N,
`Sinigaglia L. Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I with ner-
`idronate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Rheumatology
`2013;52:534-42.
`[3] Harden RN, Bruehl S, Stanton-Hicks M, Wilson PR. Proposed new diagnostic
`criteria for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Med 2007;8:326-31.
`[4] Forouzanfar T, Weber WE, Kemler M, van Kleef M.What is a meaningful pain
`
`reduction in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1? Clin J Pain
`2003;19:281-5.
`Disclosure of Interest: None declared
`DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.3734
`
`SAT0525 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PAGET’S
`DISEASE OF BONE OR WITH THE SQSTM1/P392L MUTATION
`CARRIAGE
`M.-C. Audet 1, C. Beaudoin 2, S. Guay-Bélanger 2, J. Dumont 2, J.P. Brown 1,
`L. Michou 1. 1Department of Rheumatology, CHU de Québec; 2CHU de Québec
`Research Centre, Quebec, Canada
`Background: Several publications have demonstrated that the most frequent
`mutation in Paget’s disease of bone (PDB), SQSTM1/P392L, leads to some of the
`phenotypic characteristics of PDB, but this single mutation is seemingly unable
`to result in the complete pagetic phenotype, suggesting that other mechanisms
`such as environmental factors may play a role.
`Objectives: Identify environmental
`factors associated with PDB or with the
`SQSTM1/P392L mutation carriage in the French-Canadian population.
`Methods: We investigated environmental factors through a questionnaire in 176
`French-Canadian patients with PDB and 147 healthy controls not carrier of the
`SQSTM1/P392L mutation. The questionnaire contained the following sections:
`socio-demographic and physical characteristics, tobacco exposure, diet, resi-
`dency, work, leisure, and contact with animals, during childhood/adolescence
`and adulthood. Associations between environmental
`factors and PDB, or
`SQSTM1/P392L mutation (86 individuals carried the mutation,
`including 48
`patients with PDB), were searched relying on Chi-squared, Fisher and t tests.
`Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval were calculated. Univariate followed
`by multivariate analysis were done for association with PDB. Correlation between
`members of same family was considered when possible. Analysis adjusted for age
`and gender were done for the association study with SQSTM1/P392L mutation.
`Results: We administered the questionnaire to 361 participants: 176 patients with
`PDB and 147 healthy controls. 86 individuals were carriers of the SQSTM1/P392L
`mutation, among whom 48 were patients with PDB and 38 were healthy
`carriers of
`the mutation.
`In univariate model, we found an association of
`PDB with, wood-fire heating in childhood (OR=2.48 (1.37-4.49), p<0.01), rural
`residency during adolescence (OR=2.09 [1.19-3.67], p<0.01) and residency
`near a farm in childhood (OR=1.77 [1.02-3.09], p=0.04). In multivariate model,
`significant association was found between PDB and wood-fire heating in childhood
`(OR=2.10[1.13-3.90], p=0.02). Male gender (OR=4.63 [2.46-8.72], p<0.01) and
`lower educational
`level (OR=2.13 [1.13-4.02], p=0.02) were also associated
`with PDB. Carriage of the SQSTM1/P392L mutation was associated with rural
`residency (OR=2.66 [1.42-4.99], p<0.01), wood-fire heating (OR=2.25 [1.20-4.24],
`p=0.01), residency near a farm (OR=2.37 [1.29-4.38], p<0.01) and work on a
`farm (OR=3.30 [1.75-6.24], p<0.01) in childhood. There was also an association
`with residency near a mine (OR=6.64 [1.68-26.27], p<0.01) and work in a
`mine (OR=6.89 [1.35-35.31], p=0.02). Interestingly, association with exposition to
`different animals during childhood were found with the SQSTM1/P392L mutation
`(p<0.05): horse, dog, sheep, pork, cattle and poultry.
`Conclusions: PDB and the carriage of
`the SQSTM1/P392L mutation were
`significantly associated with rural residency. Carriage of the SQSTM1/P392L
`mutation was also strongly associated to work on a farm or in a mine and
`exposition to some animals during childhood.
`Acknowledgements: CHU de Quebec foundation
`Disclosure of Interest: None declared
`DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-eular.4393
`
`SAT0526 THE FREQUENCY OF CALCIUM PYROPHOSPHATE
`DEPOSITION DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ARTHRITIS
`M. Eliseev, S. Vladimirov, E. Nasonov. Research Institute of Rheumatology,
`Moscow, Russian Federation
`Background: Most of
`the patients with acute arthritis are diagnosed gout.
`However, the frequency of Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease (CPPD)
`in patients with acute arthritis is not enough valuated.
`Objectives: To evaluate the frequency of CPPD in patients with acute arthritis
`and describe joint involvement in these patients.
`Methods: 150 adults with acute mono-/olygoarthritis during not more than 2
`weeks were enrolled. The mean age was 60±12 years (28-76 ys). All patients
`underwent aspiration of synovial fluid (SF) from inflamed joint (I MTP, knee or
`ankle). Crystal identification was performed using polarized light microscopy with
`compensator (Olympus CX31-P). Diagnosis of CPPD fulfilled McCarty diagnostic
`criteria. For both CPPD and gout the diagnosis was based on crystal visualization
`in SF.
`Results: Gout was diagnosed in 51 (34%), CPPD – in 45 (30%) of pts. 15 (14%)
`of pts occurred to have both CPPD and gout. 39 (26%) of pts had other diagnosis.
`There was male predominance in pts with gout (40m/11f) unlike CPPD, where we
`observed female predominance (32f/13m). Pts with gout were younger than those
`with CPPD (35,5±9 ys vs 58,4±12,8 ys, correspondingly, p<0,05). In CPPD pts
`arthritis most frequently developed in the knee joints (76,3%). Acute arthritis of
`the ankle and I MTP joints manifested in 30,3% and 10,5% of pts with CPPD. We
`
`Grun. Exh. 1037
`PGR for U.S. Patent No. 9,820,999
`
`1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket