throbber
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 503 (2010) 207–212
`
`Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
`
`Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
`
`j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / y a b b i
`
`C-terminal region of USP7/HAUSP is critical for deubiquitination activity and
`contains a second mdm2/p53 binding site
`Jianhong Ma a,⇑, John D. Martin b, Yu Xue c, Leng A. Lor b, Karen M. Kennedy-Wilson b, Robert H. Sinnamon b,
`
`Thau F. Ho b, Guofeng Zhang b, Benjamin Schwartz b, Peter J. Tummino d, Zhihong Lai e
`a Analytical Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, UE1125, 709 Swedeland Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA
`b Biological Reagent and Assay Development, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA
`c Biopharm Research Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, 709 Swedeland Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA
`d Emerging Science DPU, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA
`e Worldwide Clinical Trials, 1000 Continental Drive, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA
`
`a r t i c l e
`
`i n f o
`
`a b s t r a c t
`
`Article history:
`Received 1 July 2010
`and in revised form 22 August 2010
`Available online 15 September 2010
`
`Keywords:
`USP7
`HAUSP
`mdm2
`p53
`Deubiquitination
`Second binding site
`
`Introduction
`
`USP7, also known as the hepes simplex virus associated ubiquitin-specific protease (HAUSP), deubiquiti-
`nates both mdm2 and p53, and plays an important role in regulating the level and activity of p53. Here,
`we report that deletion of the TRAF-like domain at the N-terminus of USP7, previously reported to con-
`tain the mdm2/p53 binding site, has no effect on USP7 mediated deubiquitination of Ubn-mdm2 and Ubn-
`p53. Amino acids 208–1102 were identified to be the minimal length of USP7 that retains proteolytic
`activity, similar to full length enzyme, towards not only a truncated model substrate Ub-AFC, but also
`Ubn-mdm2, Ubn-p53. In contrast, the catalytic domain of USP7 (amino acids 208–560) has 50–700 fold
`less proteolytic activity towards different substrates. Moreover, inhibition of the catalytic domain of
`USP7 by Ubal is also different from the full length or TRAF-like domain deleted proteins. Using glutathi-
`one pull-down methods, we demonstrate that the C-terminal domain of USP7 contains additional binding
`sites, a.a. 801–1050 and a.a. 880–1050 for mdm2 and p53, respectively. The additional USP7 binding site
`on mdm2 is mapped to be the C-terminal RING finger domain (a.a. 425–491). We propose that the C-ter-
`minal domain of USP7 is responsible for maintaining the active conformation for catalysis and inhibitor
`binding, and contains the prime side of the proteolytic active site.
`Ó 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
`
`The ubiquitin–proteasome pathway plays an important role in
`regulating many biological processes, including cell cycle, differen-
`tiation, immune response, DNA repair, and apoptosis [1,2]. Ubiqui-
`tination is a highly dynamic and reversible process, regulated by
`multiple ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and deubiquitinating en-
`zymes. Formation of an isopeptide bond between the C-terminal
`carboxylate group of ubiquitin and the e-amino group of a Lys res-
`idue in a substrate protein proceeds through a three-step cascade
`mechanism involving the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), a ubiq-
`uitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), and a ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3).
`Substrate proteins can form conjugates with a single ubiquitin or
`ubiquitin chains at a single or multiple Lys residues [1,2].
`Ubiquitination of proteins can be reversed by the deubiquitinat-
`ing enzymes (DUBs) [3–5]. DUBs have important functions, such as
`rescuing substrate proteins from proteasomal degradation, recy-
`cling Ub, and controlling protein trafficking. There are at least five
`
`⇑ Corresponding author. Fax: +1 610 270 7100.
`
`E-mail address: jane.2.ma@gsk.com (J. Ma).
`
`0003-9861/$ - see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
`doi:10.1016/j.abb.2010.08.020
`
`distinct subclasses of DUBs, of which the Ub-specific proteases
`(USPs)1 constitute the largest family with more than 50 family
`members [3–5]. USPs are cysteine proteases containing conserved
`regions in their amino acid sequence surrounding the Cys, His, and
`Asp/Asn residues that form the catalytic triad. Beyond the catalytic
`domain, USPs often encode N-terminal and C-terminal extensions
`that may be important for substrate recognition and subcellular
`localization. The substrate specificity and physiological functions
`of most USPs are not yet understood.
`One of the best characterized USP is USP7 or HAUSP (herpes
`simplex virus associated ubiquitin-specific protease). USP7 was
`shown to directly bind to and deubiquitinate the p53 tumor
`suppressor protein [6]. Overexpression of USP7 resulted in the
`stabilization of p53 in cells. However, when USP7 was knocked
`out either by siRNA [7] or by homologous recombination [8],
`
`1 Abbreviations used: Ub, ubiquitin; DUB, deubiquitinating enzyme; USP, ubiquitin-
`specific protease; HAUSP, hepes simplex virus associated ubiquitin-specific protease;
`Ub-AFC, ubiquitin 7-amino-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin; Ubal, ubiquitin aldehyde;
`TRAF, TNF receptor associated factors; SDS–PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacryl-
`amide gel electrophoresis; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; a.a., amino acid.
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1019
`Page 1
`
`EXHIBIT 7
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449503:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`208
`
`J. Ma et al. / Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 503 (2010) 207–212
`
`stabilization of p53 was observed rather than the expected effect of
`destabilization. This paradox can be explained by USP7’s preferen-
`tial deubiquitination of mdm2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase which ubiqui-
`tinates p53 and thereby mediates its degradation. Knockdown of
`USP7 results in the stabilization of p53, induction of p53 responsive
`genes, and growth inhibition or apoptosis in cancer cells with func-
`tional p53 [7,8]. Because of the important role USP7 plays in regulat-
`ing the p53 pathway, inhibition of USP7’s protease activity or its
`interaction with mdm2 could be an effective way to reactivate p53
`for the treatment of cancer.
`USP7 is composed of 1102 amino acids and several distinct do-
`mains. The N-terminal domain (NTD) of USP7 has sequence homol-
`ogy to the TNF receptor associated factors (TRAFs) and was shown
`to bind to mdm2, p53, as well as the Epstein–Barr virus nuclear
`antigen 1 (EBNA1) [9–13]. Crystal structures and binding studies
`suggest that the mdm2 peptides bind to the same surface groove
`in USP7 as peptides derived from p53, but with more extensive
`interactions and enhanced affinity [10,12]. The C-terminal region
`of USP7(560–1102) contains regions required for interactions with
`Ataxin-1 [14] and the herpes virus protein ICP0 [11]. The catalytic
`domain was mapped to amino acids 208–560 [9]. Crystal struc-
`tures of the catalytic domain in the presence and absence of a cova-
`lent inhibitor, ubiquitin aldehyde (Ubal), revealed that the active
`site of USP7 is misaligned in the apo structure. Formation of the
`covalent adduct of Ubal with the catalytic cysteine residue induces
`a drastic conformational change in the active site, realigning the
`catalytic triad for catalysis [9].
`In the current study, we have identified novel mdm2/p53 bind-
`ing sites on USP7 (a.a. 801–1050 and 880–1050 for mdm2 and p53,
`respectively), distinct from the N-terminal TRAF-like domain. We
`have also demonstrated that the catalytic domain of USP7 (a.a.
`208–560) is significantly less active than the full-length USP7 or
`truncated USP7 (a.a. 208–1102). Moreover, inhibition of the cata-
`lytic domain of USP7 is also different from the full length or
`TRAF-like domain deleted proteins. The C-terminus of USP7 ap-
`pears to be critical for its catalytic activity either by constituting
`part of the active site or by maintaining the active conformation
`for catalysis and for inhibitor binding.
`
`Material and methods
`
`Protein expression and purification of USP7, mdm2, and p53
`
`Full-Length USP7 (NP_003461) was cloned from a human colon
`cDNA library using standard PCR techniques. It was subcloned into
`the vector pENTR/TEV/D-TOPO (Invitrogen K252520) and used as a
`template to generate different USP7 truncations. All USP7 con-
`structs contained a 6 his tag and a tobacco etch virus (tev) prote-
`ase cleavage site N-terminal of the USP7 coding region. Protein
`expression was carried out in Sf9 insect cells with baculovirus
`infection at 27 °C for 3 days.
`Sf9 cells expressing various USP7 constructs were centrifuged
`and cell pellets were lysed in buffer A (20 mM Tris–HCl at pH
`7.6, 2 mM TCEP, 5% glycerol) plus 250 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole
`and EDTA free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). The cellular ex-
`tract was clarified by centrifugation at 17,000 rpm for 60 min at
`4 °C, before loading onto a Ni–NTA column. After washing exten-
`sively with buffer A plus 250 mM NaCl containing 20 mM and then
`40 mM imidazole, his-tagged USP7 was eluted with buffer A
`containing 250 mM imidazole and 250 mM NaCl. Subsequently,
`USP7 proteins were purified by size exclusion chromatography
`(superdex 200 in buffer A with 150 mM NaCl), followed by MonoQ
`chromatography (eluted in buffer A at 180 mM NaCl).
`GST-mdm2 and its deletion mutants, GST- or strep-tagged p53
`and GST-E1 were expressed and purified as described [15].
`
`Generation and partial purification of Ubn-p53 and Ubn-mdm2
`
`UbcH5b was conjugated to Cy5-labeled ubiquitin (Cy5-Ub-
`UbcH5b) as described [15]. Ubiquitinated p53 (Ubn-p53) was gen-
`erated using p53 and Cy5-Ub-UbcH5b in an enzymatic reaction
`catalyzed by mdm2. The reaction was carried out in buffer B
`(15 mM HEPES at pH 7.5, 5 mM NaCl, and 10 mM octylglucoside)
`containing 20 lM Cy5-Ub-UbcH5b, 5 lM strep-tagged p53, and
`0.2 lM GST-tagged mdm2 at room temperature for 60 min. To
`get rid of the excess Ub-UbcH5b and mdm2, strep-tagged p53 spe-
`cies were partially purified from the reaction mixture using stept-
`actin Sepharose resin (Genosys Biotech), washed with buffer C
`(50 mM Tris at pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1% triton
`X-100 amd 0.5 mM TCEP) with 1% triton X-100 followed by buffer
`C with 0.1% triton X-100, and eluted with 4 mM d-biotin. Partial
`purified Ubn-p53 was desalted using a G-25 column into buffer C
`without triton X-100. Mdm2-catalyzed p53 ubiquitination usually
`results in multiple monoubiquitinated p53 (Ubn-p53) containing
`mainly p53 with 1–5 ubiquitin conjugates [16]. Using a Cy5-Ub
`calibration curve, we analyzed the partially purified Ubn-p53 by
`SDS–PAGE, and calculated the concentration of Ubn-p53 based on
`the fluorescence intensity of Cy5-Ub that is attached to p53. We
`estimated that the partially purified Ubn-p53 mixture contained
`24% ubiquitinated p53.
`Ubn-mdm2 was generated using the mdm2 auto-ubiquitination
`reaction carried in buffer B containing 20 lM Cy5-Ub-UbcH5b and
`0.4 lM GST-tagged mdm2 for 4 h at room temperature. The reac-
`tion mixture was incubated with glutathione–Sepharose 4B resin
`(GE Healthcare), washed with buffer D (25 mM HEPES at pH 7.3,
`150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 0.1 mM TCEP) with 1% followed
`by 0.1% triton X-100, and finally eluted with buffer D containing
`0.1% triton X-100 and 20 mM glutathione. Partial purified Ubn-
`mdm2 was desalted into a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES at pH
`7.3, 1 mM DTT and 0.05% CHAPS using a G-25 column. Because
`mdm2 auto-ubiquitination usually results in a mixture of mdm2
`with high molecular weight ubiquitin chains, we quantified the
`amount of mdm2 before and after the reaction using western blot
`analysis with a monoclonal anti-mdm2 antibody (BD Pharmingen,
`#556353). Our estimate is that 70% of mdm2 has been converted
`to Ubn-mdm2 under our reaction conditions. In our USP7 mediated
`deubiquitination assays using Ubn-mdm2 as substrates, total pro-
`tein concentration of Ubn-mdm2 was indicated in the assays.
`
`In vitro ubiquitination assays for USP7
`
`We used three substrates to assess the activity of full-length
`USP7 and various truncated constructs: ubiquitin-7-amino-4-(tri-
`fluoromethyl)coumarin (ubiquitin-AFC, Boston Biochem), Ubn-p53
`and Ubn-mdm2. Ubiquitin-AFC cleavage was monitored fluoromet-
`rically, similar to procedures described for Ub-AMC [17]. Reactions
`were carried out in buffer E (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA,
`0.5 mM TCEP, 0.1 mg/ml BSA and 0.05% CHAPS) using low volume
`384 black assay plates (GreinerBio) at room temperature. The reac-
`tion mixture contains Ub-AFC and different USP7 constructs at var-
`ious concentrations. Cleavage of Ub-AFC by USP7 was monitored
`kinetically for 1 h using the analyst plate reader (Molecular Devices)
`for fluorescence intensity at excitation/emission wavelength of
`405 nm and 520 nm, respectively. The initial velocity of the reac-
`tions was used for steady-state analysis and IC50 determination.
`An SDS–PAGE assay was used to quantify USP7 mediated
`deubiquitination of Ubn-mdm2 and Ubn-p53. Reactions were car-
`ried out at room temperature using 2.65 lg/ml Ubn-p53 or
`1.68 lg/ml Ubn-mdm2, and USP7 enzymes at various concentra-
`tions in buffer E. After 20 min, the reactions were stopped with
`4 SDS-reducing sample buffer and separated using 4–12%
`NuPAGE Bis–Tris SDS–PAGE (Invitrogen). Fluorescence intensity
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1019
`Page 2
`
`EXHIBIT 7
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449503:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`J. Ma et al. / Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 503 (2010) 207–212
`
`209
`
`of Cy5-Ub product bands were quantified on a Typhoon 9400 im-
`ager (GE Healthcare) and converted to molar units using a Cy5-
`Ub calibration curve.
`A covalent USP7 inhibitor, ubiquitin aldehyde (Ubal) (Boston
`Biochem) [18], in serial dilution ranging from 25 lM to 0.005
`nM, was premixed with various USP7 constructs indicated above
`for 1 h at room temperature. Reactions were initiated with sub-
`strates (final concentration: 0.5 lM Ub-AFC; or 2.65 lg/ml Ubn-
`p53; or 1.68 lg/ml Ubn-mdm2) and carried out as described above.
`
`Binding interaction of USP7 to mdm2 or p53 by GST pull-down
`
`Various USP7 constructs (0.5 lM) were incubated with 0.5 lM of
`GST-p53, GST-mdm2, GST-E1 or GST in buffer F (50 mM HEPES pH
`7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM TCEP, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 50 mM NaCl, and
`0.3% CHAPS) at room temperature for 30 min. GST-E1 and GST were
`included as negative controls for the pull-down. Glutathione–Se-
`pharose 4B resins (washed with buffer F, blocked with 0.5% nonfat
`milk and washed with buffer F again) were added and allowed to
`incubate for 1 h at 4 °C with mixing. The resins were washed four
`times with washing buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA,
`0.5 mM TCEP, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.5% nonidet P-
`40) and heated for 10 min at 95 °C in 1 SDS–TrisGlycine sample
`loading buffer. Bound proteins were separated on 4–20% TrisGlycine
`polyacrylamide gels, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane
`(Invitrogen), and analyzed by western blot using a monoclonal
`anti-his tag primary antibody (9.25 lg/ml) against his-tagged
`USP7 constructs and an Alexa Fluor 680 conjugated goat anti-mouse
`secondary antibody (0.8 lg/ml) (Molecular Probes); or a polyclonal
`anti-USP7 (1050–1102) primary antibody (1 lg/ml) (Bethyl Lab)
`and an Alexa Fluor 680 conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary anti-
`body (0.8 lg/ml) (Molecular Probes). Immunodetection was carried
`out using the Odyssey Infrared Image system (Li-Cor Bioscience),
`and quantified by ImageQuant (Molecular Dynamics).
`
`Results
`
`Deletion mapping of USP7 for deubiquitination activity
`
`To understand the domain requirements for USP7’s deubiquiti-
`nation activity, we expressed and purified a series of USP7 con-
`structs as N-terminal His-tagged fusion proteins. All the truncated
`USP7 enzymes contain the catalytic domain (a.a. 208–560) with
`various C-terminal extensions,
`including 208–1102, 208–1050,
`208–880, 208–801 and 208–560. The N-terminal TRAF-like domain,
`previously reported to contain the mdm2 and p53 interaction sites,
`has been deleted from these truncated USP7 constructs.
`The deubiquitination activity of all of the truncated USP7 con-
`structs were compared with full-length USP7 using Ub-AFC as a
`model substrate (Table 1). USP7(208–1102) has similar activity
`as the full length protein. However, deletion of the last 52 amino
`acids results in 65-fold loss of activity based on kcat/Km for
`
`Table 1
`Kinetic constants of full-length USP7 and its deletion mutants for the hydrolysis of
`Ub-AFC.
`
`Enzyme
`
`USP7(1–1102)
`USP7(208–1102)
`USP7(208–1050)
`USP7(208–880)
`USP7(208–801)
`USP7(208–560)
`
`Ub-AFC
`kcat (s1)
`1.64 ± 0.07
`3.28 ± 0.14
`0.014 ± 0.001
`0.042 ± 0.005
`0.010 ± 0.0004
`0.014 ± 0.0005
`
`Km  106 (M)
`0.70 ± 0.03
`1.30 ± 0.09
`0.38 ± 0.12
`1.67 ± 0.11
`1.76 ± 0.19
`4.79 ± 0.70
`
`kcat/Km  106 (s1 M1)
`2.34 ± 0.007
`2.53 ± 0.067
`0.036 ± 0.008
`0.025 ± 0.001
`0.006 ± 0.004
`0.003 ± 0.0003
`
`Each kinetic constant is the mean of two replicates ± SD.
`
`USP7(208–1050). Deletion of additional amino acids from the
`C-terminus causes further decrease in activity. The loss of activity
`is primarily due to a decrease in kcat. While Km of Ub-AFC at 1 lM
`is very similar for various USP7 constructs (except USP7(208–560)
`which has a slightly higher Km (4.79 lM)), kcat is significantly dif-
`ferent and reflects the changes in the specific activity (kcat/Km)
`for the various USP7 constructs. These results suggest that deletion
`of C-terminal region of USP7 reduces catalysis more significantly
`than affecting the binding of Ub-AFC to the enzyme.
`Since Ub-AFC is a truncated model substrate for USP7, we gen-
`erated two physiological substrates (Ubn-mdm2 and Ubn-p53) to
`compare the specific activity of the various USP7 constructs. An
`SDS–PAGE assay was used to quantify USP7 mediated deubiquiti-
`nation of Ubn-mdm2 and Ubn-p53. Fluorescence intensity of
`Cy5-Ub product bands resulted from the deubiquitination of
`Ubn-mdm2 and Ubn-p53 were quantified on a Typhoon 9400 ima-
`ger (see Supplementary data). Our results showed that USP7(208–
`1102), lacking the N-terminal mdm2/p53 binding domain, has
`similar activity as full-length USP7 in catalyzing deubiquitination
`of not only Ub-AFC, but also Ubn-mdm2 and Ubn-p53 (Table 2).
`Similar trends of activity towards these substrates were also
`observed for the C-terminally deleted constructs. Deletion of the
`last 52 residues from the C-terminus results in significant
`(>20-fold) loss of activity and additional deletions further decrease
`the specific activity towards all three substrate tested. The catalytic
`core domain, USP7(208–560), is >700-fold less active than full-
`length USP7 towards Ub-AFC and Ubn-p53 substrates and 50-fold
`less active towards Ubn-mdm2.
`
`Inhibition of USP7 catalyzed deubiquitination by Ubal
`
`Since the deletion of the C-terminal region of USP7 resulted in a
`dramatic decrease of
`its proteolytic activity, we investigated
`whether inhibition of these USP7 constructs may also be different.
`Ubal is a potent inhibitor of USPs because it forms a covalent thio-
`hemiacetal adduct with the active site Cys [18]. We demonstrated
`that Ubal exhibits time-dependent inhibition of USP7 (data not
`shown). To take into consideration the time dependency of Ubal
`modification, we preincubated USP7 enzymes with Ubal for 1 h
`prior to substrate addition and measured IC50 rather than generat-
`ing kinact and Ki values. These IC50 values reflect an approximation
`of Ubal potency under our experimental conditions. Our results
`showed that Ubal is a very potent inhibitor against full-length
`USP7 and USP7(208–1102) with IC50 against Ub-AFC of 1.18 and
`1.50 nM, respectively (Table 3). However, the inhibitory effect of
`Ubal becomes weaker towards the C-terminally deleted USP7 con-
`structs. For example, using Ub-AFC as a substrate, IC50 of Ubal
`against USP7(208–560) core catalytic domain is 317 nM, 264-fold
`less potent than against full-length USP7. Similar decrease in Ubal
`potency against USP7(208–560) was also observed using the
`
`Table 2
`Comparison of relative activity of full-length USP7 and deletion mutants in catalyzing
`Ub-AFC, Ubn-p53 and Ubn-mdm2 deubiquitination.
`
`Enzyme
`
`USP7(1–1102)
`USP7(208–1102)
`USP7(208–1050)
`USP7(208–880)
`USP7(208–801)
`USP7(208–560)
`
`Substrates
`
`Ub-AFC
`
`100 ± 0.3
`108 ± 2.9
`1.56 ± 0.34
`1.07 ± 0.06
`0.25 ± 0.02
`0.12 ± 0.01
`
`Ubn-p53
`
`100 ± 11
`64 ± 8
`2.1 ± 0.3
`2.2 ± 0.2
`0.73 ± 0.09
`0.14 ± 0.02
`
`Ubn-mdm2
`
`100 ± 8
`118 ± 13
`4.4 ± 0.4
`11.3 ± 1.6
`0.66 ± 0.05
`2.0 ± 0.3
`
`Relative activity of full-length USP7 was set as 100. Specific activities of all USP7
`constructs were compared with the full-length USP7. Each relative activity is the
`mean of more than two replicates ± SD.
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1019
`Page 3
`
`EXHIBIT 7
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449503:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`210
`
`J. Ma et al. / Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 503 (2010) 207–212
`
`Table 3
`Effects of ubiquitin aldehyde on USP7 catalyzed hydrolysis of various substrates.
`
`Enzyme
`
`USP7(1–1102)
`USP7(208–1102)
`USP7(208–1050)
`USP7(208–880)
`USP7(208–801)
`USP7(208–560)
`
`Substrate
`
`Ub-AFC
`IC50 (nM)
`
`1.18 ± 0.12
`1.50 ± 0.10
`8.69 ± 1.00
`5.18 ± 1.21
`28.3 ± 5.1
`316.9 ± 6.4
`
`Ubn-p53
`IC50 (nM)
`
`1.02 ± 0.15
`
`–
`–
`–
`–
`433.8 ± 20
`
`Ubn-mdm2
`IC50 (nM)
`
`1.58 ± 0.61
`–
`–
`–
`–
`340.6 ± 224.2
`
`The data is the mean of two determinations ± SD.
`
`physiological substrates, Ubn-p53 and Ubn-mdm2. Taken together,
`these data demonstrate that inhibition by Ubal of USP7 catalyzed
`deubiquitination is less potent towards C-terminally truncated vs
`full-length USP7 protein.
`
`Mapping of the second mdm2/p53 binding site on USP7 critical for
`deubiquitination
`
`We have observed that USP7(208–1102), lacking the N-terminal
`mdm2/p53 binding TRAF-like domain, has similar activity as full-
`length USP7 in catalyzing deubiquitination of Ubn-mdm2 and
`Ubn-p53 (Table 2). This result suggested that binding through the
`N-terminal TRAF-like domain of USP7 is not essential for USP7 cat-
`alyzed mdm2 or p53 deubiquitination. Therefore, USP7 probably
`contain a second mdm2 and p53 binding site potentially critical
`for its deubiquitination activity.
`To probe for the putative interaction site between USP7
`constructs and mdm2 or p53, we carried out GST pull-down
`
`experiments. Our results showed that USP7 constructs 1–1102,
`208–1102 and 208–1050 bind to mdm2 and p53 (Fig. 1A and B).
`In addition, USP7(208–880) binds mdm2, but not p53. In contrast,
`USP7(208–801) and the catalytic domain USP7(208–560) does not
`bind to either mdm2 or p53. Therefore, 801–1050 residues of USP7
`contain the second binding site for mdm2; and 880–1050 residues
`of USP7 contain the second binding site for p53.
`
`Mapping of the USP7 binding site on mdm2 critical for
`deubiquitination
`
`To identify the additional site on mdm2 critical for USP7 bind-
`ing, we performed GST pull-down experiments using USP7 or
`USP7(208–1102) and various mdm2 deletion mutants. A series of
`truncated mdm2 constructs containing the C-terminal RING finger
`region with different deletion at the N-terminus were expressed
`and purified as N-terminal GST-tagged fusion proteins [15]. Our re-
`sults showed that both full-length USP7 and USP7(208–1102),
`lacking the previously identified N-terminal p53/mdm2 binding
`domain, can bind to full-length mdm2, mdm2-S211 (a.a. 211–
`491), mdm2-E285 (a.a. 285–491), mdm2-D361 (a.a. 361–491)
`and mdm2-S425 (a.a. 425–491) (Fig. 2); and as expected have no
`significant binding affinity for the negative control GST-E1 and
`GST proteins. Therefore, the RING finger domain (a.a. 425–491)
`contains the additional USP7 binding site.
`
`Discussion and conclusion
`
`USP7 is an important regulator of the mdm2/p53 pathway. It
`preferentially deubiquitinates mdm2 over p53. The net result of
`
`Binding to USP7
`by GST pulldown
`Activity p53 mdm2
`
`USP7
`
`1-205
`
`208-560
`
`560-880
`
`880-1102
`
` +++++ + +
`
`USP7(208-1102)
`
`208-560
`
`560-880
`
`880-1102
`
` +++++ +
`
` +
`
`USP7(208-1050)
`
`208-560
`
`560-880
`
`880-1102
`
` +++ + +
`
`USP7(208-880)
`
`208-560
`
`560-880
`
` ++ -
`
`USP7(208-801)
`
`208-560
`
`560-801
`
` + -
`
`USP7(208-560)
`
`208-560
`
` + -
`
` +
`
` -
`
` -
`
`A
`
`B
`
`USP7 1-1102 208-1102 208-1050
`1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 MW
`kDa
`250
`
`USP7 208-880 208-801 208-560
`1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 MW
`kDa
`250
`
`98
`64
`50
`36
`
`16
`6
`
`98
`64
`50
`36
`
`16
`6
`
`Fig. 1. Identification of the second p53 and mdm2 binding site on USP7. (A) A summary of USP7 activity and binding to p53 and mdm2 in various USP7 constructs. The
`regions of USP7 corresponding to the p53/mdm2 binding (1–205), the catalytic domain (205–560), the ICP0 binding domain (205–880) and the C-terminal domain (880–
`1102) have been labeled using different colors. (B) Binding of various USP7 constructs to GST tagged p53 or mdm2 using GST pull-down as described in materials and
`methods. GST-E1 was included as a negative control. Bound USP7 protein was detected by western blot using an anti-His antibody and the Odyssey Infrared Image system.
`Lane 1, GST-p53; 2, GST-mdm2; 3, GST-E1; 4, 2 pmol full-length USP7 or 1 pmol of USP7 deletion mutants as controls for antibody detection. MW, molecular mass markers.
`(For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1019
`Page 4
`
`EXHIBIT 7
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449503:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`J. Ma et al. / Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 503 (2010) 207–212
`
`211
`
`A
`
`GST p53 binding
`
`acidic domain Zn finger RING finger
`
`1 102 223 274 305 322 438 478 491
`
`Mdm2-FL
`
`Mdm2-S211
`
`Mdm2-E285
`
`Mdm2-D361
`
`Mdm2-S425
`
`B
`
`Full-length USP7
`
`USP7 (208-1102)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MW
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MW
`
`Fig. 2. Identification of the second USP7 binding site on mdm2. (A) A summary of various GST-mdm2 constructs. The regions of mdm2 corresponding to the p53 binding, the
`acidic, the zinc finger and the RING finger domain have been labeled using different colors. The numbers corresponds to amino acid residues of mdm2. (B) Western blots of
`GST pull-down using full-length USP7 or USP7(208–1102) and GST–mdm2 as described in materials and methods. GST and GST–E1 were included as negative controls. Lane
`1, GST-mdm2; 2, GST-mdm2-S211; 3, GST-mdm2-E285; 4, GST-mdm2-D361; 5, GST-mdm2-S425; 6, GST; 7. GST-E1; 8, 1.6 pmol full-length USP7 or 1 pmol of USP(208–
`1102) mutant as controls for antibody detection. MW, molecular mass markers. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the
`web version of this article.)
`
`USP7 knockout is the destabilization of mdm2 and induction of
`p53 and p53 responsive genes [7,8]. Targeting the USP7 deubiqui-
`tinating activity or the mdm2 interaction with USP7 could be effec-
`tive ways to treat cancer by activating wild type p53. Therefore, it
`is important to gain a better understanding of the mechanism of
`substrate recognition and catalysis for USP7. In this report, we have
`identified a novel mdm2/p53 binding site on USP7 (a.a. 801–1050/
`880–1050, respectively). We have also demonstrated that the cat-
`alytic domain of USP7(208–560) is significantly less active than the
`full-length USP7 or USP7(208–1102). Moreover, inhibition of the
`catalytic domain of USP7 by Ubal is also different from the full
`length or TRAF-like domain deleted proteins. The C-terminus of
`USP7 appears to be critical for its catalytic activity either by consti-
`tuting part of the active site or by maintaining the proper confor-
`mation for catalysis and inhibitor binding.
`The region of USP7 critical for mdm2 and p53 binding was
`originally mapped to the N-terminal TRAF-like domain by Hu
`and colleagues [9]. Using a large p53 fragment (a.a. 94–393),
`USP7(53–208) was identified to be the p53 binding motif by gel
`filtration analysis. They also identified a p53 fragment (a.a. 357–
`382) to be both necessary and sufficient for USP7(53–208) binding
`[9]. Using a large mdm2 fragment (a.a. 170–423), they reported
`that USP7(53–208) also contains a mdm2 binding site, and that a
`mdm2 fragment (a.a. 223–232) is essential to bind to USP7(53–
`208) [10]. The crystal structures of the USP7 TRAF-like domain
`alone and with a p53 peptide (359–368) or a mdm2 peptide
`(223–332) fused to its C-terminus showed that the p53 and
`mdm2 peptides recognize the same surface groove in USP7. How-
`ever, the mdm2 peptide has more extensive interactions and better
`affinity than the p53 peptide [10]. Sheng et al. also co-crystalized
`the TRAF-like domain of USP7 with peptides derived from p53
`(a.a. 359–367) and mdm2 (a.a. 141–150) [13]. They found that
`these peptides bind the same surface on USP7 as Epstein–Barr nu-
`clear antigen-1, explaining the competitive nature of the interac-
`tions. It is worth noting that while the two groups identified the
`same p53 peptide critical
`for interacting with the TRAF-like
`domain of USP7, the mdm2 peptides that each group has identified
`
`are different, suggesting that there are at least two binding sites on
`mdm2 for the TRAF-like domain of USP7.
`These earlier studies highlighted the importance of USP7’s
`N-terminal TRAF-like domain for mdm2/p53 interaction. Surpris-
`ingly, we demonstrated that the deletion of the TRAF-like domain
`had no impact on USP7’s deubiquitination activity towards not
`only Ub-AFC, but also Ubn-mdm2 and Ubn-p53. This paradox has
`led us to carry out GST pull-down experiments using full-length
`mdm2 and p53 to map their binding domains on USP7. We demon-
`strated that the C-terminal domain of USP7 contains a second site
`required for mdm2/p53 binding (a.a. 801–1050 and a.a. 880–1050
`for mdm2 and p53 binding, respectively). We speculate that the
`earlier studies have missed this second mdm2/p53 binding site
`on USP7 because fragments of p53 (missing the N-terminal do-
`main) and mdm2 (without the N-terminal p53 binding domain
`and the C-terminal RING finger domain) rather than full length
`proteins were used for complex formation with various USP7 con-
`structs. In fact, our deletion mapping of mdm2 identified the RING
`finger domain to contain the additional USP7 interaction site.
`Although we did not map the second USP7 binding site on p53, it
`is possible that p53 (1–94) contains the second USP7 binding site
`that interacts with USP7(880–1050).
`USP7, mdm2 and p53 proteins all contain at least two binding
`sites for each other [15,19]. Different binding sites correspond to
`different functions. The N-terminal interaction of mdm2 and p53
`results in the inhibition of p53 transcriptional activation, while
`the second binding between mdm2(211–361) and p53 core do-
`main is critical for mdm2-catalyzed p53 ubiquitination [15,19].
`For USP7, even though the N-terminal TRAF-like domain does bind
`to mdm2 and p53, it is not essential for USP7’s deubiquitinating
`activity towards mdm2 and p53. Instead, the TRAF-like domain
`has been reported to affect nuclear localization of USP7, suggesting
`that it may have functions not directly related to its enzymatic
`activity. The C-terminal region (a.a. 560–1102) has been reported
`to contain the binding site for protein partners like ICP0 and Atax-
`in-1 [11,14]. A possible role of the C-terminal region for oligomer-
`ization has also been suggested [20]. Our results demonstrated that
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1019
`Page 5
`
`EXHIBIT 7
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449503:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`212
`
`J. Ma et al. / Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 503 (2010) 207–212
`
`C-terminal region of USP7 contains a second p53/mdm2 binding
`site and is critical for catalysis, either by constituting part of the ac-
`tive site or by maintaining the active conformation for catalysis
`and for inhibitor binding. Since USP7’s deubiquitinating activity
`is extremely sensitive to the loss of the last 52 amino acids of
`the C-terminus beyond the second mdm2/p53 binding site, activity
`measurement of our deletion mutants did not allow us to conclude
`that the second mdm2/p53 binding site is indeed critical for sub-
`strate recognition and deubiquitination. Additional investigations
`will be required to unambiguously demonstrate whether the sec-
`ond mdm2/p53 binding sites critically contribute to substrate rec-
`ognition and catalysis.
`USP7(208–1102) is the minimal domain required for activity
`and substrate recognition. Within this region of USP7, a.a. 208–
`560 contains the catalytic triad and the ubiquitin binding site.
`USP7(801–1050) contains the p53/mdm2 binding site. Deletion
`of the last 52 residues of USP7 C-terminus has very dramatic im-
`pact on USP7 activity. Therefore, USP7(1050–1102) either forms
`part of the active site or maintains the active conformation of
`USP7. Inter

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket