throbber
Biochemical characterization of USP7 reveals
`post-translational modification sites and structural
`requirements for substrate processing and subcellular
`localization
`Amaury Ferna´ ndez-Montalva´ n1, Tewis Bouwmeester2, Gerard Joberty2, Robert Mader3,
`Marion Mahnke4, Benoit Pierrat1, Jean-Marc Schlaeppi4, Susanne Worpenberg1
`and Bernd Gerhartz1
`
`1 Expertise Platform Proteases, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
`2 Cellzome AG, Heidelberg, Germany
`3 Musculoskeletal Disease Area, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
`4 Biologics Centre, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
`
`Keywords
`biochemical characterization; cysteine
`protease; deubiquitinating enzyme; ubiquitin
`pathway; USP7 ⁄ HAUSP
`
`Correspondence
`A. Ferna´ ndez-Montalva´ n, Molecular
`Screening and Cellular Pharmacology,
`Merck Serono S.A., 9 Chemin des Mines,
`Case postale 54, CH-1211 Geneva 20,
`Switzerland
`Fax: +41 22 4149558
`Tel: +41 22 4144977
`E-mail: amaury.fernandez@merckserono.net
`B. Gerhartz, Expertise Platform Proteases,
`Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research,
`CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
`Fax: +41 61696 8132
`Tel: +41 61696 1204
`E-mail: bernd.gerhartz@novartis.com
`
`(Received 20 April 2007, revised 14 June
`2007, accepted 25 June 2007)
`
`doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05952.x
`
`Ubiquitin specific protease 7 (USP7) belongs to the family of deubiquitinat-
`ing enzymes. Among other functions, USP7 is involved in the regulation of
`stress response pathways, epigenetic silencing and the progress of infections
`by DNA viruses. USP7 is a 130-kDa protein with a cysteine peptidase core,
`N- and C-terminal domains required for protein–protein interactions. In
`the present study, recombinant USP7 full length, along with several vari-
`ants corresponding to domain deletions, were expressed in different hosts
`in order to analyze post-translational modifications, oligomerization state,
`enzymatic properties and subcellular localization patterns of the enzyme.
`USP7 is phosphorylated at S18 and S963, and ubiquitinated at K869 in
`mammalian cells. In in vitro activity assays, N- and C-terminal truncations
`affected the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme different. Both the protease
`core alone and in combination with the N-terminal domain are over 100-
`fold less active than the full length enzyme, whereas a construct including
`the C-terminal region displays a rather small decrease in catalytic effi-
`ciency. Limited proteolysis experiments revealed that USP7 variants con-
`taining the C-terminal domain interact more tightly with ubiquitin. Besides
`playing an important role in substrate recognition and processing, this
`region might be involved in enzyme dimerization. USP7 constructs lacking
`the N-terminal domain failed to localize in the cell nucleus, but no nuclear
`localization signal could be mapped within the enzyme’s first 70 amino
`acids. Instead, the tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor-like
`region (amino acids 70–205) was sufficient to achieve the nuclear localiza-
`tion of the enzyme, suggesting that interaction partners might be required
`for USP7 nuclear import.
`
`Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) are a superfamily of
`thiol- and metallo proteases specialized in the process-
`ing of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. They are
`
`responsible for the disassembly of ubiquitin chains, and
`for the cleavage of mono- and oligomers of this mole-
`cule, either in precursor form or attached to small
`
`Abbreviations
`CBP, calmodulin binding protein; DUB, deubiquitinating enzyme; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase;
`NLS, nuclear localization signal; SUMO-1, small ubiquitin-like modifier protein 1; TAP, tandem affinity purification; TRAF, tumor necrosis
`factor receptor associated factor; Ub, ubiquitin; UCH, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase; USP, ubiquitin specific protease.
`
`4256
`
`FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4256–4270 ª 2007 Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research (NIBR). Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1021
`Page 1
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449507:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`A. Ferna´ ndez-Montalva´ n et al.
`
`Biochemical characterization of USP7
`
`nucleophiles and proteins [1]. Among the DUBs, the
`ubiquitin specific proteases (USPs) constitute the larg-
`est subfamily with 58 cysteine peptidase genes identified
`so far [2]. One of the most prominent members of this
`subfamily is USP7 (EC 3.1.2.15), also known as herpes
`virus associated ubiquitin-specific protease (HAUSP)
`due to its discovery in the promyelocytic leukemia
`nuclear bodies of herpes simplex virus-infected cells [3].
`Recognition and processing of ubiquitylated forms of
`the tumor suppressor p53 and its negative modulator
`MDM2, a RING domain E3-ligase, suggested an
`important role for USP7 in cell survival pathways
`[4–7]. More recently, the identification of MDMX and
`DAXX (both regulatory proteins in the p53-MDM2
`pathway) as USP7 substrates [8,9] has revealed a far
`more complex involvement of this enzyme in cell fate
`decisions than initially expected. In addition, reports
`about USP7 activity on the epigenetic regulator his-
`tone 2B [10] and the transcription factor FOXO4 [11]
`point to further roles for this DUB in the maintenance
`of cell homeostasis. Additional evidence for the crucial
`role of USP7 is provided by the fact that targeting this
`enzyme belongs to the strategies evolved by the herpes
`simplex virus [12,13] and Epstein–Barr [14,15] viruses
`for successful host infection.
`USP7 is a 1102 amino acid protein with a molecular
`weight of approximately 130 kDa (Fig. 1A). In cells,
`the enzyme has been reported to be dimerized, poly-
`ubiquitinated and polyneddylated [16]. The sites or
`regions involved in these events have not been mapped
`so far. The N-terminal of USP7 part displays sequence
`homology to the TNF receptor associated factors
`(TRAFs) and was shown to interact with several
`TRAF family proteins [17]. This domain also binds
`fragments derived from p53, MDM2 and the Epstein–
`Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) proteins in vitro
`[14,15,18–21]. Recently, elucidation of the 3D-structure
`of an USP7 fragment containing amino acids 54–204
`disclosed an eight-stranded beta sandwich fold typical
`for the TRAF protein family [15]. Further cocrystal
`structures with substrate-derived peptides,
`revealed
`that a P ⁄ AXXS consensus
`sequence is
`recognized
`mainly by residues W165 and N169 located in a shal-
`low surface groove on the TRAF domain [15,19,21].
`Limited proteolysis identified two digestion resistant
`fragments in the C-terminal region of USP7, mapping
`to amino acids 622–801 and 885–1061 [18]. The first of
`these polypeptides was shown to mediate the inter-
`action of USP7 with the herpes virus protein ICP0
`in vitro [18]. Additionally, a yeast two hybrid screen
`revealed a region including amino acids 705–1102 was
`required for association with Ataxin-1 [22] (Fig. 1A).
`Further structural–functional features of this domain
`
`A
`
`C223
`
`H464
`
`D481
`
`TRAF
`
`Protease Core
`
`C-Terminal
`
`1
`
`208
`
`560
`
`1102
`
`Ubiquitin binding
`
`EBNA1 / p53 /
`HDM-2 binding
`
`ICP-0 binding
`
`Ataxin binding
`
`208
`
`560
`
`1102
`
`B
`
`1
`
`USP7-FL
`
`USP7 1-560
`
`USP7 208-560
`
`USP7 208-1102
`
`USP7 1-205-EGFP
`
`EGFP
`
`EGFP
`
`USP7 20-205-EGFP
`
`EGFP
`
`USP7 50-205-EGFP
`
`EGFP
`
`USP7 70-205-EGFP
`
`Fig. 1. Structural–functional
`features and constructs of USP7
`designed for this study. (A) Schematic representation of the USP7
`structure. The N-terminal TRAF-like domain (amino acids 50–205) is
`preceded by a Q-rich region not represented here. This domain has
`been reported to interact with p53, MDM2 and Epstein–Barr virus
`nuclear antigen 1. The protease core (amino acids 208–560) con-
`tains the catalytic triad formed by the conserved residues C223,
`H464 and D481. Two protein–protein interaction sites at amino
`acids 599–801 and 705–1102 were described in this region for ICP-
`0 and Ataxin-1. (B) Design of USP7 variants used in this work. Con-
`structs comprising USP7 full
`length (FL) and amino acids 1–560,
`208–560 and 208–1102, were prepared for expression in different
`hosts. Constructs expressed using the baculovirus system (all
`except the protease core) had a C-terminal hexahistidine tag. The
`catalytic domain was expressed as a GST-6XHis N-terminal fusion
`protein. Variants designed for expression in mammalian cells had
`an N-terminal 3XFLAG tag and a C-terminal Myc tag. USP7-FL con-
`structs used for proteomics analysis contained either N- or C-termi-
`nal CBP-Protein A tags separated by a TEV-protease cleavage site.
`
`are currently unknown. Sequence analysis anticipated
`a protease domain with conserved Cys and His
`boxes delimited by the N- and C-terminal regions [3].
`
`FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4256–4270 ª 2007 Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research (NIBR). Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
`
`4257
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1021
`Page 2
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449507:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`Biochemical characterization of USP7
`
`A. Ferna´ ndez-Montalva´ n et al.
`
`limited proteolysis and
`Matching these predictions,
`X-ray crystallography disclosed amino acids 208–560
`as the protease core of USP7 [20] (Fig. 1A). Two
`crystal
`structures of
`this
`fragment alone and in
`complex with ubiquitin (Ub)-aldehyde
`revealed a
`‘Fingers’,
`‘Palm’ and ‘Thumb’
`three-domain archi-
`tecture, apparently conserved throughout
`the USPs
`[20,23–25]. These structures illuminated an activation
`mechanism for USP7 in which a papain-like catalytic
`triad (C223, H464 and D481) is assembled via con-
`formational changes triggered by the interaction with
`ubiquitin. A similar mechanism was described the
`same year for the activation of the structural homo-
`logue calpain by calcium ions
`[26].
`Interestingly,
`here the catalytic unit is significantly less active than
`the full
`length heterodimeric enzyme [26,27]. The
`individual contributions of USP7 structural domains
`to the activity of the full length enzyme have not been
`investigated so far.
`In the present study, the biochemical properties and
`structure–function relationships of USP7 were charac-
`terized. We have mapped sites for phosphorylation
`and ubiquitination, and studied the oligomerization
`state of the enzyme in vitro and in cells. The kinetic
`parameters for the hydrolysis of ubiquitin substrates
`by full length USP7 and domain deletion variants have
`been determined. The results suggest a role for the
`C-terminus in substrate processing and oligomeriza-
`tion. In addition, a fragment including amino acids
`70–205 was found to be sufficient for nuclear targeting.
`As this region is involved in protein–protein inter-
`actions, association with nuclear proteins might be
`required for USP7 subcellular localization.
`
`Results
`
`Heterologous expression and purification
`of functional USP7 variants
`
`In the present study, a novel semiautomated expression
`and purification system was used for the production of
`several USP7 domain deletion variants (Fig. 1B) in
`Baculovirus-infected insect cells. The procedure yielded
`approximately 6 mg (USP7 full length), 5 mg (1–560)
`and 4 mg (208–1102) of purified recombinant protein
`per litre of insect cell culture. In addition, an average
`of 7 mg USP7 208-560 per litre of Escherichia coli fer-
`mentation broth was obtained from the soluble cell
`fraction. The recombinant proteins were purified to
`homogeneity (‡ 90%) based on SDS ⁄ PAGE (Fig. 2)
`and reversed phase HPLC analysis. N-terminal
`sequencing showed that both USP7-FL and USP7
`1-560 expressed in insect cells were N-terminally blocked
`
`Fig. 2. Purity and folding of recombinant USP7 variants. SDS ⁄ PAGE
`analysis (in a 4–20% gradient gel) of USP7 variants before (–) and
`after (+) 1-h native limited proteolysis with tosylphenylalanylchlo-
`romethane-treated trypsin as described in the experimental section.
`The arrows indicate digestion products in USP7 full
`length sub-
`jected to sequencing analysis. The N-terminal sequences of these
`fragments are written on the left with special symbols used to
`mark bands of similar identity derived from other USP7 variants.
`These symbols were also used to represent graphically the cleav-
`age sites on the schematic view of USP7 shown below.
`
`by acetylation, as confirmed by MALDI-TOF-MS.
`LC-MS analysis of USP7-FL revealed two protein
`masses of 130 464.0 and 130 540.0 Da, corresponding
`very likely to acetylated and single phosphorylated
`USP7, respectively. Again, two masses of 65 919.5 and
`65 999.5 were found for USP7 1-560, corresponding
`likewise
`to acetylated and single phosphorylated
`USP7 1-560,
`respectively. This
`post-translational
`modification was later confirmed in USP7 purified
`from mammalian cells (see below). LC-MS analysis
`of USP7 208-1102 showed that around 60% of the
`protein had a three amino acid truncation at
`the
`N-terminus. None of these modifications or hetero-
`geneities was observed in the 208-560 protein produced
`in E. coli.
`All USP7 variants were subjected to limited proteo-
`lysis by trypsin under native conditions,
`in order to
`evaluate their structural integrity and correct folding
`by comparison of cleavage sites. For USP7-FL, bands
`corresponding to seven main digestion fragments were
`visualized by SDS ⁄ PAGE (Fig. 2). Five out of them,
`with a molecular weight ‡ 25 kDa were subjected to
`
`4258
`
`FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4256–4270 ª 2007 Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research (NIBR). Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1021
`Page 3
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449507:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`A. Ferna´ ndez-Montalva´ n et al.
`
`Biochemical characterization of USP7
`
`protein sequencing. This analysis mapped their N-ter-
`to residues I36, K209, E557 ⁄ Q559, S341 and
`mini
`I885. Identical digestion patterns were found in all
`variants according to the presence or absence of the
`cleavage sites in their sequences (Fig. 2), strongly indi-
`cating a correct overall folding of these proteins. The
`tryptic processing matched with the domain organiza-
`tion proposed earlier in similar experiments (Fig. 1A),
`although some cleavage sites differed from those previ-
`ously described [18,20].
`
`Identification of post-translational modifications
`in USP7 purified from mammalian cells
`
`The observation that USP7 expressed in insect cells
`was phosphorylated in its N-terminal region motivated
`us to investigate post-translational modifications on
`tandem affinity purification (TAP)-tagged USP7 puri-
`fied from mammalian cells. LC-MS ⁄ MS analysis
`revealed the presence of two phosphopeptides AGE
`QQLSEPEDMEMEAGDTDDPPR, corresponding to
`amino acids 12 to 35, and IIGVHQEDELLECLSP
`ATSR, corresponding to amino acids 949–968. Manual
`the corresponding MS ⁄ MS spectra
`verification of
`allowed for the assignment of the phosphoacceptor res-
`idues to S18 and S963, respectively (Fig. 3A). USP7
`was previously described to be ubiquitinylated and
`neddylated. Western analysis showed that affinity puri-
`fied TAP-tagged USP7 is (mono)-ubiquitinylated in
`HeLa cells (Fig. 3B). LC-MS ⁄ MS identified a single
`ubiquitinylated ⁄ neddylated
`peptide, DLLQFFKPR
`corresponding to amino acids 863–871. Manual inspec-
`tion of the MS ⁄ MS spectra showed that the diglycine
`remnant was conjugated to K869. The strong identifi-
`cation of ubiquitin in the same gel band as USP7,
`combined with the absence of Nedd8, strongly suggests
`that the modified site is indeed ubiquitinylated.
`
`Analysis of USP7 oligomerization: possible role
`of the C-terminal region
`
`USP7 was reported to exist both as dimer in cells [16],
`and as a monomer in solution [18,20]. Interestingly,
`during the size exclusion chromatography step of
`USP7-FL and USP7 208-1102 purification, fractions
`displaying DUB activity eluted from the Superdex 200
`SEC column as single peaks but at elution volumes
`corresponding to significantly larger proteins. These
`observations were confirmed by analysis of
`freshly
`purified USP7-FL using analytical size exclusion chro-
`matography coupled to light scattering measurement.
`As shown in the supplementary Fig. S1A, USP7-FL
`showed a retention time on the Sephacryl S-300
`
`column between ferritin (440 kDa) and aldolase
`(158 kDa), suggesting a molecular weight of around
`250 kDa. In contrast,
`the light scattering measure-
`ments showed an average molecular mass between
`131.8 and 139.0 kDa, corresponding to the monomeric
`form of USP7. Noteworthy, the light scattering results
`may be indicative of a mixed population, with mostly
`monomers but also a few dimers or higher aggregates.
`The amount of dimers or aggregates appears
`to
`increase, when freezing and thawing the protein (data
`not shown). In native nonreducing PAGE, purified
`USP7-FL migrated as two discrete bands of relative
`mobilities corresponding to the monomer and putative
`dimers (supplementary Fig. S1B). Accordingly, when
`cell lysates containing either endogenously or ectopi-
`cally expressed USP7 were subjected to native PAGE
`and proteins detected by western blot again two anti-
`body reactive bands were observed (supplementary
`Fig. S1C). In line with this observation, LC-MS ⁄ MS
`analysis of proteins copurified with the TAP-tagged
`USP7 as described above revealed the presence of the
`nontagged USP7 N-terminal peptide (MNHQQQQQ
`QQK) derived from the endogenous enzyme (not
`shown). Interestingly, variants lacking the C-terminal
`region ran as a single band in the native nonreducing
`PAGE (supplementary Fig. S1B), suggesting a role for
`the C-terminal in the oligomerization event.
`
`Substrate specificity and enzymatic properties
`of USP7
`
`As part of the characterization of USP7 biochemical
`properties, we have measured its kinetic parameters for
`the hydrolysis of ubiquitin C-terminal 7-amido-4-meth-
`ylcoumarin (Ub-AMC), a fluorogenic substrate which
`has proven to be an useful tool with a number of
`deubiquitinating enzymes [28–31]. In order to assess its
`substrate specificity, USP7 activities on small ubiqu-
`itin-like modifier protein 1 (SUMO-1)-AMC, Nedd8-
`AMC and Z-LRGG-AMC,
`a
`synthetic peptide
`substrate representing the C-terminus of ubiquitin,
`were
`investigated.
`In addition, we
`evaluated the
`hydrolysis by the enzyme of ubiquitin C-terminal-Lys-
`tetramethylrhodamine (Ub-K-TAMRA) and Ub-K-
`peptide-TAMRA, two substrates with the fluorophore
`group attached as isoamide bond. The Ub-AMC assay
`described in the experimental section was linear for at
`least 1 h at enzyme concentrations up to 5 nm. Using
`similar conditions with SUMO-1-AMC and Nedd8-
`AMC as
`substrates, no USP7 activity could be
`detected,
`indicating a high specificity for ubiquitin,
`despite the well known homologies among ubiquitin-
`like proteins (Fig. 4A). Unlike other DUBs [31,32],
`
`FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4256–4270 ª 2007 Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research (NIBR). Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
`
`4259
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1021
`Page 4
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449507:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`Biochemical characterization of USP7
`
`A. Ferna´ ndez-Montalva´ n et al.
`
`A
`100
`
`y''5
`531.4
`
`LE/EL
`243.2
`
`y''6
`698.4
`
`pS
`
`IIGVHQEDELLECL(pS)PATSR
`
`y''2
`262.2
`
`y''3
`363.2
`
`
`
`MH33+ - H3PO4
`
`b10 2+
`567.9
`
`y'‘8 2+
`486.3
`
`y''6-
`H3PO4
`600.4
`
`y'‘8-
`H3PO4
`873.6
`
`750.4
`
`y7
`811.5
`
`b10
`1134.7
`
`b9
`1021.7
`y9
`1100.6
`
`y8
`971.6
`
`%
`
`b2
`227.2
`
`I/L
`86.1
`
`a2
`199.2
`
`0
`
`b11
`1247.9
`
`b12
`1376.8
`
`m/z
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800
`
`1000
`
`1200
`
`1400
`
`Tandem Affinity Purification
`
`Lysate
`
`MG132
`
`-
`
`+
`
`TEV-
`eluate
`
`-
`
`+
`
`CBP-
`eluate
`
`-
`
`+
`
`B
`
`100
`
`b2
`229.1
`
`y''5
`808.5
`
`y''4
`661.4
`
`y''6
`936.6
`
`Ub-USP7
`
`TAP-USP7
`CBP-USP7
`
`y''7
`1049.7
`
`m/z
`
`97 kDa
`
`97 kDa
`
`WB: Ub
`
`WB: CBP
`
`(GG)K
`b3
`342.2
`
`y''3
`514.3
`
`a2
`201.1
`
`y''2
`272.2
`
`%
`
`0
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`800
`
`1000
`
`Fig. 3. Characterization of USP7 post-translational modifications. (A) LC-MS ⁄ MS spectrum of the USP7 tryptic peptide IIGVHQEDELLECL ⁄
`(pS)PATSR containing the phosphorylated residue S963. (B) Left panel: western blot detection of TAP-tagged USP7 and ubiquitinylated proteins
`throughout the two-step tandem affinity purification from mammalian cells using anti-CBP and anti-ubiquitin sera. Cells were either nontreated
`or pretreated with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. Right panel: LC-MS ⁄ MS spectrum of the USP7 tryptic peptide DLLQFF ⁄ (Ub-K)PR
`containing the ubiquitinated residue K869.
`
`4260
`
`FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4256–4270 ª 2007 Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research (NIBR). Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1021
`Page 5
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449507:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`A. Ferna´ ndez-Montalva´ n et al.
`
`Biochemical characterization of USP7
`
`Fig. 4. Enzymatic characterization of USP7. (A) Progress curves for the USP7-catalyzed hydrolysis of Ub-AMC (j), SUMO-1-AMC (d) and
`Nedd8-AMC (.). Raw fluorescence intensities (RFU) collected every 5 min with kex ¼ 360 nm and kem ¼ 465 nm were plotted as a function
`of the time (s). Reactions were conducted at room temperature, in 50 mM Tris ⁄ HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 100 mM NaCl
`and 0.1% (w ⁄ v) Chaps using 1.56 nM of USP7 full length. Ub-AMC, SUMO-1-AMC and Nedd8-AMC were at 1 lM. Each data point repre-
`sents the average of at least two independent experiments with two replicas each. (B,C) Dependence of enzyme velocity on the pH (B),
`ionic strength or viscosity (C) for the USP7-catalyzed hydrolysis of Ub-AMC. Reactions were conducted at room temperature in appropriate
`buffers for each pH (see experimental section) or in 25 mM Tris ⁄ HCl, buffer, pH 7.5, 5 mM dithiothreitol and 0.1% (w ⁄ v) CHAPS at the indi-
`cated concentrations of NaCl (j), NaSCN (d), Na-citrate (m) or glycerol (h). In these experiments, the nominal concentration of USP7 was
`5 nM and Ub-AMC was at 1 lM.(D) Linearity range of the Ub-AMC hydrolysis reactions catalyzed by USP7-FL (j), USP7 1-560 (d), USP7
`208-560 (m) and USP7 208-1102 (.). These experiments were conducted at room temperature in 50 mM Tris ⁄ HCl buffer, pH 7.5, 1 mM
`EDTA, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 100 mM NaCl and 0.1% (w ⁄ v) Chaps with 1 lM Ub-AMC and the enzyme concentrations indicated in the experi-
`mental section.
`
`hydrolysis of Z-LRGG-AMC could not be measured
`at maximum enzyme concentrations of 200 nm. USP7
`is active on Ub-AMC in a pH range between 7.5 and
`9.5 with an activity maximum at pH 8.5 (Fig. 4B).
`Substrate hydrolysis was affected by increasing concen-
`trations of NaCl (Fig. 4C). The effect of the chaotrop-
`ic NaSCN was noticeable at lower concentrations than
`with NaCl or the kosmotropes Na-citrate and glycerol
`(Fig. 4C). The data shown in Table 1 and supplemen-
`tary Fig. 2 demonstrate that USP7-FL recognized
`Ub-AMC and Ub-K-TAMRA with slightly different
`
`affinities. Accordingly, the catalytic efficiency of USP7-
`FL for the hydrolysis of Ub-K-TAMRA was improved
`by five-fold with respect
`to Ub-AMC. Under the
`conditions chosen for the assay, saturation was not
`reached with Ub-K-peptide-TAMRA.
`
`Processing of ubiquitin synthetic substrates by
`USP7-FL and domain deletion variants
`
`Evaluation of the hydrolysis of Ub-AMC and Ub-K-
`TAMRA by USP7-FL and its domain deletion
`
`FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4256–4270 ª 2007 Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research (NIBR). Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
`
`4261
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1021
`Page 6
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449507:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`Biochemical characterization of USP7
`
`A. Ferna´ ndez-Montalva´ n et al.
`
`Table 1. Kinetic parameters for the hydrolysis of Ub-AMC (a) and Ub-K-TAMRA (b) by USP7 domain deletion variants.
`
`USP7 variant
`
`Substrate
`
`[Protein] (nM)
`
`Full length
`
`1–560
`
`208–560
`
`208–1102
`
`Ub-AMC
`Ub-K-TAMRA
`Ub-AMC
`Ub-K-TAMRA
`Ub-AMC
`Ub-K-TAMRA
`Ub-AMC
`Ub-K-TAMRA
`
`1
`5
`100
`1000
`100
`2000
`5
`100
`
`KM (lM)
`
`17.5 ± 2.0
`6.6 ± 0.7
`27.6 ± 3.4a
`10.9 ± 1.0
`44.2 ± 3.8a
`36.8 ± 4.9a
`22.8 ± 2.1
`7.2 ± 0.8
`
`kcat (s
`
`)1)
`
`kcat ⁄ KM (s
`
`
`
`)1ÆlM)1)
`
`Fold decrease in
`catalytic efficiency
`
`3.56
`6.76
`0.045
`0.018
`0.077
`0.039
`0.805
`0.33
`
`2.03 · 105
`1.02 · 106
`1.6 · 103
`1.6 · 103
`1.7 · 103
`1.1 · 103
`3.53 · 104
`4.58 · 104
`
`1
`1
`127
`644
`119
`936
`6
`23
`
`a Km values higher than the maximum substrate concentrations used for the titrations should be considered as approximate figures.
`
`variants at increasing enzyme concentrations revealed
`that different amounts of each protein were required
`to attain comparable reaction velocities (Fig. 4D). The
`kinetic parameters for these reactions were determined
`by measuring their rates at increasing substrate con-
`centrations. To this end, enzyme concentrations that
`allowed assay linearity for at least 1 h were used. As
`shown in Table 1,
`the deletion variants recognized
`both substrates with similar affinities, but remarkable
`differences were observed in the turnover (kcat) and
`efficiency (kcat ⁄ KM).
`consequently in the
`catalytic
`USP7 208-560 and USP7 1-560 were significantly less
`active than the full length enzyme, whereas the enzy-
`matic activity of USP7 208-1102 was rather similar to
`the wild-type. These results indicate an important role
`for the C-terminal domain in catalysis. The compari-
`son between Ub-AMC and Ub-K-TAMRA, revealed
`more pronounced differences in the catalytic efficiency
`of the variants relative to USP7-FL when using the
`e-amino-linked substrate.
`
`C-terminal truncations destabilize the
`ubiquitin–enzyme complex
`
`Having realized the importance of USP7 C-terminus
`for efficient substrate processing,
`the question was
`asked whether
`conformational
`changes driven by
`ubiquitin binding to the core domain, or direct inter-
`actions of this region with the substrate would be
`required for proper recognition and processing. In
`order to address this issue USP7-FL and the domain
`deletion variants were subjected to limited proteolysis
`by trypsin under native conditions in the presence or
`absence of a molar excess ubiquitin. Digestion was
`examined over time by SDS ⁄ PAGE and Coomassie
`Blue staining. Surprisingly, the fragments produced by
`limited proteolysis were identical with and without
`ubiquitin (Fig. 5). N-terminal sequencing of them con-
`firmed that the cleavage sites corresponded to those
`
`Fig. 5. Limited proteolysis of USP7 variants in the presence and
`absence of ubiquitin. SDS ⁄ PAGE (4–20% gradient gels) showing the
`limited proteolysis of native USP7-FL and variants thereof by trypsin
`over time with and without ubiquitin. The arrows indicate fragments
`from USP7-FL and USP7 208-1102 protected from tryptic digestion by
`the presence of ubiquitin. N-terminal sequences of these fragments
`are shown on the right accompanied by the symbols used in Fig. 2.
`
`observed in the experiment described above (Fig. 2).
`However, stabilization of some proteolysis products in
`the presence of ubiquitin was observed, demonstrating
`a
`partial
`protection
`of
`some
`trypsin
`cleavage
`sequences. The main fragment stabilized in the full
`length enzyme contained amino acids I36 to R558.
`This effect was less pronounced in USP7 1-560. In
`variants lacking the N-terminal domain, a fragment
`corresponding to amino acids K209 to R559 was stabi-
`lized by the presence of ubiquitin. Interestingly, this
`behavior was more evident for USP7 208-1102. In
`both digestion products, the cleavage site protected by
`the presence of ubiquitin was Ser341, located in the
`‘fingers’ region of the catalytic core domain involved
`in the recognition of the ubiquitin core. These results
`show that all USP7 variants were able to bind ubiqu-
`itin through the protease core domain, suggesting that
`
`4262
`
`FEBS Journal 274 (2007) 4256–4270 ª 2007 Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research (NIBR). Journal compilation ª 2007 FEBS
`
`Post-Grant Review Petition for US 9,840,491
`EXHIBIT 1021
`Page 7
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`DELANSORNE DECLARATION
`
`214LT:20700:449507:1:ALEXANDRIA
`
`

`

`A. Ferna´ ndez-Montalva´ n et al.
`
`Biochemical characterization of USP7
`
`the enzyme–substrate complexes were more stable in
`the context of an intact C-terminal region.
`
`Structural requirements for USP7 nuclear
`localization
`
`In order to further characterize structure–function rela-
`tionships for USP7, we studied the effect of domain
`deletions in the subcellular localization patterns of the
`enzyme. To this end, several mammalian cell lines were
`transiently transfected with vectors encoding the USP7
`variants described above (Fig. 1B). Synthesis of recom-
`binant proteins was corroborated by immunoblot anal-
`ysis of cell
`lysates with either FLAG (M2) or Myc
`(9E10) specific monoclonal antibodies (not shown).
`Expression levels were dependent on the construct
`sequence and the cell line used. Both antibodies detected
`higher quantities of USP7 1-560 and USP7 208-560
`than USP7 full
`length and USP7 208-1102 in the
`western blots (not shown). Immunofluorescent staining
`revealed different subcellular localization patterns for
`the constructs (Fig. 6). USP7-FL and variant 1-560
`localized preferentially to the cell nucleus, whereas
`USP7 208-560 and USP7 208-1102 were detected mostly
`in the cytosol. A small
`fraction of USP7 208-560
`observed in the nucleus is likely an artifact caused by
`the strong over expression of this variant because USP7
`208-1102 did not show this behavior. Fusion proteins
`containing the N-terminal domain of USP7 (amino
`acids 1–205) and variants with deletions of the first 20,
`50 and 70 amino acids linked to enhanced green fluores-
`cent protein (EGFP) at their C-terminus localized in the
`cell nucleus (Fig. 6).
`
`Discussion
`
`In the present study, we have mapped S18, S963 and
`K869 as phosphorylation and ubiquitination sites of
`USP7. Depending on the techniques used, monomers
`or dimers of the enzyme were detected in vitro, whereas
`in cells evidence was obtained pointing to oligomeriza-
`tion events. Deletion of
`the N- and C-terminal
`domains of USP7 affected the activity of the enzyme,
`with the C-terminus having a major impact. Interest-
`ingly, this region appears to be required for enzyme
`oligomerization. Finally, we have observed that the
`N-terminal domain of USP7, and particularly a frag-
`ment including amino acids 70–205,
`is sufficient to
`achieve nuclear localization of the enzyme.
`Based on our results, USP7 can be added to the list
`of deubiquitinating enzymes found to be phosphory-
`lated [33–35]. In fact, phosphorylation on S18 had been
`reported previously from a HeLa large scale proteomics
`
`study [36]. This phosphorylation site is a low stringency
`consensus site for casein kinase II. Noteworthy, the
`casein kinase II catalytic subunits alpha1 and alpha2
`and regulatory subunit beta were copurified with
`tagged USP7, suggesting that CKII could indeed be the
`upstream kinases responsible for the phosphorylation
`at this position (data not shown). S963 phosphoryla-
`tion has not been described so far and this position is
`not a known consensus site for any kinase. Interest-
`ingly, both sites are located near regions involved in
`protein–protein interactions. By analogy with the
`DUB CYLD [35] and TRAF family members such as
`TANK [37,38], whose function is modulated by the
`inhibitor of jB kinase, a regulatory role can be pre-
`sumed for USP7 phorsphorylation. The identification
`of K869 as the ubiquitination site of USP7 represents
`additional evidence for the interaction of the enzyme
`with E3 ubiquitin ligases. Remarkably, the ubiquitina-
`tion site is close to the region where it was reported to
`interact with ICP-0 [18], supporting the observation
`that USP7 can be ubiquitinated by this E3 ligase but
`not by MDM2 [12]. Our findings indicate that USP7
`could exist as a dimer in cells. The data obtained with
`purified enzyme is, however, contradictory, suggesting
`that further cellular components might be required to
`stabilize these oligomers. Noteworthy the enzymatic
`behavior of USP7 in the presence of kosmotropes cor-
`responds to an enzyme that is fully active in its mono-
`meric form. Further analysis is required in order to
`understand the roles of the putative dimerization event.
`USP7 recognizes ubiquitin with high specificity.
`Moreover,
`its lack of activity on short peptide sub-
`strates comprising the C-terminus of ubiquitin aligns
`with recent data reported for USP2 [25] and USP8
`[39], suggesting that recognition of both the ubiquitin
`C-terminus and its core are equally important
`for
`catalysis. The affinity of USP7 for Ub-AMC (KM ¼
`17.5 lm) was approximately 500-fold lower than in the
`case of the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases (UCHs)
`[29]. Compared to other USPs, USP7 shows slightly
`for Ub-AMC than USP5 (KM ¼
`lower affinities
`1.4 lm) [30] and USP2 (KM ¼ 0.554 lm) [25], respec-
`tively, and displays a similar KM as USP8 (KM ¼
`10.2 lm) [39]. Differences in the ubiquitin recognition
`mechanisms and in the structural rearrangements upon
`substrate binding displayed by UCHL-1 [37], UCHL-3
`[20,40,41] and USP5 [32,42], might account for the
`variations in affinity with respect to USP7. Renatus
`et al. [25] discussed recently the possible origin of the
`substrate affinity divergences compared to USP7

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket