throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 28
`
`
`
`
` Entered: December 6, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`ADELLO BIOLOGICS LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`AMGEN INC. and AMGEN MANUFACTURING LIMITED
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case PGR2019-00001
`Patent No. 9,856,287 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before ZHENYU YANG, CHRISTOPHER G. PAULRAJ, and
`J. JOHN LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`YANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement after Institution of Trial
`35 U.S.C. § 327; 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00001
`Patent No. 9,856,287 B2
`
`
`With our authorization, Petitioner Adello Biologics, LLC and Patent
`Owner filed a Joint Motion to Terminate this proceeding pursuant to 35
`U.S.C. § 327. Paper 25. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327(b), they filed a true and
`correct copy of a settlement agreement. Ex. 1052. In addition, they also
`jointly requested that the settlement agreement be filed as business
`confidential information, and be kept separate from the publicly available
`patent files. Paper 26.
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 327(a), “[a] post-grant review instituted under this
`chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” In
`this case, although Patent Owner has filed its Patent Owner Response, the
`Board has not decided the merits of the proceeding.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.72, “[t]he Board may terminate a trial without
`rendering a final written decision, where appropriate, including . . . pursuant
`to a joint request under 35 U.S.C. . . . 327(a).” After reviewing the Joint
`Motion to Terminate and the settlement agreement, we determine that it is
`appropriate to terminate the proceeding with respect to Petitioner Adello.
`We previously granted the Motion Requesting Adverse Judgment
`against Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. Paper 23. Under Section 327(a), “[i]f
`no petitioner remains in the post-grant review, the Office may terminate the
`review.” We determine that it is appropriate to terminate the proceeding in
`its entirety without rendering a final written decision. Therefore, the Joint
`Motion to Terminate is GRANTED.
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00001
`Patent No. 9,856,287 B2
`
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate is GRANTED and this
`proceeding is hereby TERMINATED; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the settlement agreement will be treated
`as business confidential information, and will be kept separate from the
`patent files.
`
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00001
`Patent No. 9,856,287 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Teresa Rea
`Deborah Yellin
`Shannon Lentz
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`trea@crowell.com
`dyellin@crowell.com
`slentz@crowell.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`J. Steven Baughman
`Megan Raymond
`PAUL WEISS RIFKIND WHARTON & GARRISON LLP
`sbaughman@paulweiss.com
`mraymond@paulweiss.com
`
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket