throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 32
`Entered: December 27, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`GENOME & COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case PGR2019-00002
`Patent 9,855,302 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SHERIDAN K. SNEDDEN, SUSAN L.C. MITCHELL, and
`JOHN E. SCHNEIDER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SCHNEIDER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00002
`Patent 9,855,302 B2
`
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner both request an oral hearing pursuant to
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 27 and 28. The requests are granted to the extent
`
`set forth below and subject to the following conditions.
`
`Oral arguments will commence at 1:00 PM Eastern time on
`
`January 15, 2020, at the USPTO Headquarters on the ninth floor of Madison
`
`Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. The hearing will be
`
`open to the public for in-person attendance that will be accommodated on a
`
`first-come, first-served basis. The parties are directed to contact the Board
`
`at least 10 days in advance of the hearing if there are any concerns about
`
`disclosing confidential information. The Board will provide a court reporter
`
`for the hearing, and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record
`
`of the hearing. To facilitate planning, each party must send an email
`
`message to PTABHearings@uspto.gov five days prior to the hearing if the
`
`number planning to attend the hearing in-person for its side (attorneys and
`
`others) exceeds five people.
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner both request sixty minutes for argument.
`
`Papers 27 and 28. Accordingly, the Board determines that each party shall
`
`be allotted sixty (60) minutes of total time to present argument. Petitioner
`
`bears the ultimate burden of proof that the patent claims at issue are
`
`unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will open the hearing by presenting its
`
`case regarding the challenged claims for which we instituted trial. Petitioner
`
`may reserve some of its argument time for rebuttal. Absent special
`
`circumstances, a petitioner will not be permitted to reserve for rebuttal more
`
`than half the total time allotted for argument. Thereafter, Patent Owner will
`
`respond to Petitioner’s presentation and present its argument regarding its
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00295
`Patent 9,320,765 B2
`
`motion to amend. Patent Owner also may reserve some of its argument time
`
`for a brief sur-rebuttal.
`
`The Board’s August 2018 Trial Practice Guide Update (“TPGU”)
`
`provides an opportunity for the parties to request a pre-hearing conference.
`
`See TPGU 19 (“The purpose of the pre-hearing conference is to afford the
`
`parties the opportunity to preview (but not argue) the issues to be discussed
`
`at the oral hearing, and to seek the Board’s guidance as to particular issues
`
`that the panel would like addressed by the parties.”). If either party desires a
`
`pre-hearing conference, the parties should jointly contact the Board by
`
`January 8, 2020 to request a conference call for that purpose.
`
`Demonstrative exhibits used at the final hearing are aids to oral
`
`argument and not evidence, and should be clearly marked as such. For
`
`example, each slide of a demonstrative exhibit may be marked with the
`
`words “DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE” in the footer.
`
`Demonstrative exhibits must not include new evidence and each must
`
`include citations to the record sufficient to establish that the exhibit contains
`
`no new argument or evidence not already of record in the proceeding(s) in
`
`which it is offered. The parties are directed to serve demonstrative exhibits
`
`on opposing counsel at least seven (7) days before the hearing date. Please
`
`also provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board at
`
`least seven (7) days prior to the hearing by emailing them to
`
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov. Notwithstanding 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), the
`
`parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in the record of this
`
`proceeding without prior authorization from the Board.
`
`The Board expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith
`
`to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits, but if such objections
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00295
`Patent 9,320,765 B2
`
`cannot be resolved, the parties may file any objections to demonstrative
`
`exhibits with the Board at least four (4) days before the hearing. Any
`
`objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be
`
`considered waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`
`demonstratives are subject to objection and include a short (one sentence or
`
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`
`schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`
`reserve ruling on the objections until the oral argument. The parties are
`
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`
`Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB
`
`January 27, 2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content
`
`of demonstrative exhibits.
`
`One member of the panel will attend the hearing electronically from a
`
`remote location and will not be able to view the projection screen in the
`
`hearing room. If a demonstrative exhibit is not made available prior to the
`
`hearing so that a judge appearing remotely has access to the demonstrative,
`
`that demonstrative may not be presented at the hearing. Counsel must
`
`identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or
`
`page number) referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00295
`Patent 9,320,765 B2
`
`accuracy of the reporter’s transcript and for the benefit of the judge(s)
`
`presiding over the hearing remotely.
`
`The Board generally expects lead counsel for each party to be present
`
`in person at the oral hearing. Any counsel of record may present the party’s
`
`argument as long as that counsel is present in person.
`
`A party may also request remote video attendance for one or more of
`
`its other attendees to view the hearing from any USPTO location. To
`
`request remote video viewing, a party must send an email message to
`
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov ten business days prior to the hearing, indicating
`
`the requested location and the number planning to view the hearing from the
`
`remote location. The Board will notify the parties if the request for video
`
`viewing is granted. Note that it may not be possible to grant the request due
`
`to the availability of resources.
`
`Any special requests for audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`
`PTABHearings@uspto.gov. A party may also indicate any special requests
`
`related to appearing at an in-person oral hearing, such as a request to
`
`accommodate physical needs that limit mobility or visual or hearing
`
`impairments, and indicate how the PTAB may accommodate the special
`
`request. Any special requests must be presented in a separate
`
`communication not less than five (5) days before the hearing
`
`It is ORDERED that the parties’ requests for oral hearing (Papers 27
`
`and 28) are granted subject to the conditions set forth in this Order; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that oral hearing, conducted pursuant to the
`
`procedures outlined above, shall commence at 1:00 PM Eastern Time on
`
`January 15, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00295
`Patent 9,320,765 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`John A. Bauer
`Kongsik Kim
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS GLOVESKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`John.Bauer@mintz.com
`KKim@mintz.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
` Scott E. Kamholtz
`Jennifer L. Robbins
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`skamholz@cov.com
`jrobbins@cov.com
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket