throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`JENNEWEIN BIOTECHNOLOGIE GmbH,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`GLYCOSYN LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case PGR2019-00023
`U.S. Patent No. 9,970,018
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO SEAL AND TO ENTER STIPULATED
`PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`

`

`Case No. PGR2019-00023
`Patent No. 9,970,018
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Patent Owner Glycosyn LLC
`
`(“Glycosyn” or “Patent Owner”) respectfully submits this motion to seal portions of
`
`its Patent Owner Preliminary Response (“Preliminary Response”) and the entirety
`
`of Exhibit 2002 (Excerpts of the December 14, 2018 Deposition Transcript of Dr.
`
`Gregory Stephanopoulos) (“Stephanopoulos Transcript”) which is being filed
`
`concurrently with this Motion. Sealing the material set forth below is required to
`
`maintain confidentiality designations made by Petitioner Jennewein Biotechnologie
`
`GmbH (“Jennewein” or “Petitioner”) during the related ITC proceeding, Certain
`
`Human Milk Oligosaccharides and Methods of Producing the Same, Inv. No. 337-
`
`TA-1120 (U.S.I.T.C.) (the “ITC Investigation”).
`
`Glycosyn further requests entry of the Stipulated Protective Order attached as
`
`Appendix 1, which is based on the Board’s Default Protective Order with minor edits
`
`added to conform the Default Protective Order with the protective order in place at
`
`the ITC. The Stipulated Protective Order with these changes highlighted in blue is
`
`attached as Appendix 2.
`
`The parties have not met and conferred on this Motion. On Friday, April 5,
`
`2019, counsel for Glycosyn contacted Petitioner’s counsel by email and identified
`
`the portions of the Stephanopoulos Transcript that Glycosyn planned to submit with
`
`its Preliminary Response. Glycosyn’s counsel requested that Jennewein de-
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case No. PGR2019-00023
`Patent No. 9,970,018
`
`designate the portions of the deposition transcript included in Exhibit 2002 or
`
`identify any Jennewein confidential information that required protection. On
`
`Tuesday, April 9, 2019, counsel for Jennewein replied to state that he was busy with
`
`a trial but that a response would be coming “as soon as possible.” As of the time of
`
`this filing, Glycosyn has not received a response regarding the confidentiality of
`
`Exhibit 2002 but Patent Owner has agreed to the entry of the Stipulated Protective
`
`Order.
`
`II.
`
`LEGAL STANDARD FOR SEALING THE IDENTIFIED
`INFORMATION
`Documents filed in an IPR are generally available to the public. 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.14. However, the Board may, for good cause, protect confidential information
`
`from public disclosure. 37 C.F.R. § 42.14; see also Garmin Int’l v. Cuozzo Speed
`
`Tech., LLC, IPR2012-00001, Paper 36 at 3-4 (PTAB Apr. 5, 2013). Where possible,
`
`parties should redact sensitive information from their filings, rather than seek to seal
`
`entire documents. Office Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48761 (2012).
`
`When determining good cause, the Board must balance the public’s interest
`
`in a complete and understandable file history with the party’s interest in protecting
`
`sensitive information. See Garmin, IPR2012-00001, Paper 36, 3-4 (citing Office
`
`Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. at 48760). However, the public’s interest in
`
`having access to a party’s confidential business that is only indirectly related to
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case No. PGR2019-00023
`Patent No. 9,970,018
`
`patent validity is “minimal.” Id. at 8-9 (granting the patent owner’s motion to seal
`
`an agreement relating to the “commercializ[ation]” of the patent-at- issue).
`
`Glycosyn is submitting excerpts of the Stephanopoulos Transcript (Exhibit
`
`2002) with its Preliminary Response. Glycosyn’s Preliminary Response also
`
`references and includes content from this same deposition transcript. The
`
`Stephanopoulos Deposition excerpts to be sealed were designated as confidential by
`
`the Petitioner during the ITC Investigation pursuant to a protective order, and
`
`Glycosyn’s request is based on the need to respect that designation and maintain the
`
`non-disclosure of information, at least until such time as Petitioner responds to
`
`Glycosyn’s request for de-designation.1 The Preliminary Response also includes
`
`and quotes information from that same exhibit (Exhibit 2002). See e.g., Paper No.
`
`5 at pp. 10-11.
`
`In addition, pursuant to paragraph 5(A)(ii) of the Stipulated Protective Order,
`
`Patent Owner has filed a redacted version of the Preliminary Response (see Paper
`
`1 It is Glycosyn’s position that there is no basis to designate any of the cited
`
`portions of the Stephanopoulos Transcript as confidential under any protective
`
`order, but Glycosyn is filing this motion out of respect for the ITC protective order
`
`and in light of the fact that Glycosyn has not yet received a response from counsel
`
`for Patent Owner to Glycosyn’s April 5 request for de-designation.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case No. PGR2019-00023
`Patent No. 9,970,018
`
`No. 6) in an attempt to minimize the impact on the public’s interest in maintaining a
`
`complete and understandable record.
`
`III. CERTIFICATION OF CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §
`42.54
`Glycosyn has attempted to confer in good faith with Petitioner regarding the
`
`confidentiality designation attached to Exhibit 2002 to determine if this motion to
`
`seal was necessary. As of the date of this filing, Glycosyn has not received a
`
`substantive response from Petitioner regarding that exhibit. However, the parties
`
`have reached an agreement on the Stipulated Protective Order and Glycosyn
`
`respectfully requests that the Board enter that order in this proceeding.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case No. PGR2019-00023
`Patent No. 9,970,018
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`For the foregoing reasons, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`grant this Motion to Seal and to Enter the Stipulated Protective Order.
`
`Dated: April 10, 2019
`
`/Peter J. Cuomo/
`Peter J. Cuomo (Reg. No. 58,481)
`Daniel B. Weinger (Reg. No. 68,836)
`Michael C. Newman
`(pro hac vice to be filed)
`Thomas H. Wintner
`(pro hac vice to be filed)
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,
`GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`One Financial Center
`Boston, MA 02111
`Telephone: 617-348-1854
`Facsimile: 617-542-2241
`E-mail: pjcuomo@mintz.com
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case No. PGR2019-00023
`Patent No. 9,970,018
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that a copy of PATENT OWNER’S MOTION TO SEAL AND TO
`
`ENTER PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER is being served by electronic mail
`
`on the following counsel of record:
`
`Lead Counsel
`Bryan Nese (Reg. No. 66,023)
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006-1101
`Telephone: (202) 263-3266
`Fax: (202) 263-3300
`bnese@mayerbrown.com
`US-CLIENT-
`JenneweinITC@mayerbrown.com
`
`Backup Counsel
`Gary M. Hnath
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1999 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006-1101
`Telephone: (202) 263-3040
`Fax: (202) 263-3300
`ghnath@mayerbrown.com
`
`Scott A. McMurry (Reg. No. 61,152)
`Ying-Zi Yang (Reg. No. 52,381)
`Lana Khoury
`MAYER BROWN LLP
`1221 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10020
`Telephone: (212) 506-2500
`Fax: (212) 849-5656
`smcmurry@mayerbrown.com
`yyang@mayerbrown.com
`lkhoury@mayerbrown.com
`
`Dated: April 10, 2019
`
`/Peter J. Cuomo/
`Peter J. Cuomo (Reg. No. 58,481)
`
`6
`
`

`

`Appendix 1
`Appendix 1
`
`

`

`Stipulated Protective Order
`This stipulated protective order governs the treatment and filing of confidential
`information, including documents and testimony.
`
`Confidential information shall be clearly marked “PROTECTIVE ORDER
`1.
`MATERIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY MATERIAL.”
`
`Access to confidential information marked as “PROTECTIVE ORDER
`2.
`MATERIAL” is limited to the following individuals who have executed the Acknowledgement
`appended to this order:
`
`Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the proceeding
`(A)
`and other persons who are named parties to the proceeding.
`
`Outside Counsel. Outside Counsel of record for a party in the proceeding
`(B)
`(and they shall have such access without the requirement to sign the Acknowledgement).
`
`Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who further certify
`(C)
`in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor to any party, or a consultant for, or
`employed by, such a competitor with respect to the subject matter of the proceeding.
`
`(D)
`
`In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`Other Employees of a Party. Employees, consultants or other persons
`(E)
`performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and support staff, who sign the
`Acknowledgement, shall be extended access to confidential information only upon agreement of
`the parties or by order of the Board upon a motion brought by the party seeking to disclose
`confidential information to that person. The party opposing disclosure to that person shall have
`the burden of proving that such person shall be restricted from access to confidential
`information.
`
`The Office. Employees and representatives of the Office who have a need
`(F)
`for access to the confidential information shall have such access without the requirement to sign
`an Acknowledgement. Such employees and representatives shall include the Director, members
`of the Board and their clerical staff, other support personnel, court reporters, and other persons
`acting on behalf of the Office.
`
`Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court
`(G)
`reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who are reasonably necessary to
`assist those persons in the proceeding shall not be required to sign an Acknowledgement, but
`shall be informed of the terms and requirements of the Protective Order by the person they are
`supporting who receives confidential information.
`
`A party or non-party may designate certain confidential material as “HIGHLY
`3.
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY MATERIAL,” by marking it as such,
`provded that the party or non-party has a good faith basis to believe that such information is
`particularly sensitive and a substantial competitive harm might result if it were made public.
`Access to any material marked as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`MATERIAL” is limited to the following individuals who have executed the Acknowledgement
`appended to this order: outside counsel of record for a party in this IPR Proceeding, and only the
`
`

`

`individuals identified abouve in 2(C), 2(F), and 2(G). Nothing in this Order, or the parties’
`consent thereto, should be construed to supersede or replace any other confidentiality obligations
`held by a disclosing party under a protective order entered by another tribunal including the
`International Trade Commission or any U.S. district court.
`
`Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts to maintain
`4.
`the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`(A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which persons not
`authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality of the
`(B)
`information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those the recipient uses to maintain the
`confidentiality of information not received from the disclosing party;
`
`Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access to the
`(C)
`confidential information understand and abide by the obligation to maintain the confidentiality of
`information received that is designated as confidential; and
`
`Limiting the copying of confidential information to a reasonable number
`(D)
`of copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and maintaining a record of the locations of such
`copies.
`
`Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following procedures to
`5.
`maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`(A)
`
`Documents and Information Filed With the Board
`
`A party may file documents or information with the Board under
`(i)
`seal, together with a non-confidential description of the nature of the confidential information
`that is under seal and the reasons why the information is confidential and should not be made
`available to the public. The submission shall be treated as confidential and remain under seal,
`unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the Board
`determines that the documents or information do not qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of the
`information submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file confidential and non-
`confidential versions of its submission, together with a Motion to Seal the confidential version
`setting forth the reasons why the information redacted from the non-confidential version is
`confidential and should not be made available to the public. The non-confidential version of the
`submission shall clearly indicate the locations of information that has been redacted. The
`confidential version of the submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted information shall
`remain under seal unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte,
`the Board determines that some or all of the redacted information does not qualify for
`confidential treatment.
`
`Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties. Information
`(B)
`designated as confidential that is disclosed to another party during discovery or other
`proceedings before the Board shall be clearly marked as “PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL”
`or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY MATERIAL” and shall be
`produced in a manner that maintains its confidentiality.
`2
`
`

`

`Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order. The Standard
`(i)
`Acknowledgement of Protective Order form submitted herewith may be used to acknowledge a
`protective order and gain access to information covered by the protective order.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order
`
`I, __________________________ , affirm that I have read the Protective Order; that I will abide
`
`by its terms; that I will use the confidential information only in connection with this proceeding
`
`and for no other purpose; that I will only allow access to support staff who are reasonably
`
`necessary to assist me in this proceeding; that prior to any disclosure to such support staff I
`
`informed or will inform them of the requirements of the Protective Order; that I am personally
`
`responsible for the requirements of the terms of the Protective Order and I agree to submit to the
`
`jurisdiction of the Office and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
`
`for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order and providing remedies for its breach.
`
`Signed by:
`
`Title:
`
`Company:
`
`Date:
`
`4
`
`

`

`Appendix 2
`Appendix 2
`
`

`

`Default Stipulated Protective Order
`This standing stipulated protective order governs the treatment and filing of confidential
`information, including documents and testimony.
`
`Confidential information shall be clearly marked “PROTECTIVE ORDER
`1.
`MATERIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY MATERIAL.”.”
`
`Access to confidential information marked as “PROTECTIVE ORDER
`2.
`MATERIAL” is limited to the following individuals who have executed the Acknowledgement
`appended to this order:
`
`Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the proceeding
`(A)
`and other persons who are named parties to the proceeding.
`
`Outside Counsel. Outside Counsel Party Representatives.
`(B)
`Representatives of record for a party in the proceeding (and they shall have such access without
`the requirement to sign the Acknowledgement).
`
`Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who further certify
`(C)
`in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor to any party, or a consultant for, or
`employed by, such a competitor with respect to the subject matter of the proceeding.
`
`(D)
`
`In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`Other Employees of a Party. Employees, consultants or other persons
`(E)
`performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and support staff, who sign the
`Acknowledgement, shall be extended access to confidential information only upon agreement of
`the parties or by order of the Board upon a motion brought by the party seeking to disclose
`confidential information to that person. The party opposing disclosure to that person shall have
`the burden of proving that such person shall be restricted from access to confidential
`information.
`
`The Office. Employees and representatives of the Office who have a need
`(F)
`for access to the confidential information shall have such access without the requirement to sign
`an Acknowledgement. Such employees and representatives shall include the Director, members
`of the Board and their clerical staff, other support personnel, court reporters, and other persons
`acting on behalf of the Office.
`
`Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court
`(G)
`reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who are reasonably necessary to
`assist those persons in the proceeding shall not be required to sign an Acknowledgement, but
`shall be informed of the terms and requirements of the Protective Order by the person they are
`supporting who receives confidential information.
`
`A party or non-party may designate certain confidential material as “HIGHLY
`3.
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY MATERIAL,” by marking it as such,
`provded that the party or non-party has a good faith basis to believe that such information is
`particularly sensitive and a substantial competitive harm might result if it were made public.
`Access to any material marked as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`MATERIAL” is limited to the following individuals who have executed the Acknowledgement
`
`

`

`appended to this order: outside counsel of record for a party in this IPR Proceeding, and only the
`individuals identified abouve in 2(C), 2(F), and 2(G). Nothing in this Order, or the parties’
`consent thereto, should be construed to supersede or replace any other confidentiality obligations
`held by a disclosing party under a protective order entered by another tribunal including the
`International Trade Commission or any U.S. district court.
`
`Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts to maintain
`3.4.
`the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`(A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which persons not
`authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality of the
`(B)
`information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those the recipient uses to maintain the
`confidentiality of information not received from the disclosing party;
`
`Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access to the
`(C)
`confidential information understand and abide by the obligation to maintain the confidentiality of
`information received that is designated as confidential; and
`
`Limiting the copying of confidential information to a reasonable number
`(D)
`of copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and maintaining a record of the locations of such
`copies.
`
`Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following procedures to
`4.5.
`maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`(A)
`
`Documents and Information Filed With the Board
`
`A party may file documents or information with the Board under
`(i)
`seal, together with a non-confidential description of the nature of the confidential information
`that is under seal and the reasons why the information is confidential and should not be made
`available to the public. The submission shall be treated as confidential and remain under seal,
`unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the Board
`determines that the documents or information do not qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of the
`information submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file confidential and non-
`confidential versions of its submission, together with a Motion to Seal the confidential version
`setting forth the reasons why the information redacted from the non-confidential version is
`confidential and should not be made available to the public. The non-confidential version of the
`submission shall clearly indicate the locations of information that has been redacted. The
`confidential version of the submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted information shall
`remain under seal unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte,
`the Board determines that some or all of the redacted information does not qualify for
`confidential treatment.
`
`Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties. Information
`(B)
`designated as confidential that is disclosed to another party during discovery or other
`proceedings before the Board shall be clearly marked as “PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL”
`
`2
`
`

`

`or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY MATERIAL” and shall be
`produced in a manner that maintains its confidentiality.
`
`Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order. The Standard
`(i)
`Acknowledgement of Protective Order form submitted herewith may be used to acknowledge a
`protective order and gain access to information covered by the protective order.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order
`
`I, __________________________ , affirm that I have read the Protective Order; that I will abide
`
`by its terms; that I will use the confidential information only in connection with this proceeding
`
`and for no other purpose; that I will only allow access to support staff who are reasonably
`
`necessary to assist me in this proceeding; that prior to any disclosure to such support staff I
`
`informed or will inform them of the requirements of the Protective Order; that I am personally
`
`responsible for the requirements of the terms of the Protective Order and I agree to submit to the
`
`jurisdiction of the Office and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
`
`for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order and providing remedies for its breach.
`
`Signed by:
`
`Title:
`
`Company:
`
`Date:
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket