Alicea, Franchesca
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Good afternoon,
`
`Trials
`Thursday, May 14, 2020 2:53 PM
`Venkat Konda; Trials
`Modi, Naveen; FlexLogix Konda PGR; Anderson, Paul M.
`RE: PGR2019-00037 & 42: Request for more pages - Revised Motion to Amend by
`Tomorrow May 15, 2020
`
`1. The page limits for Patent Owner’s Revised Motion to Amend and for Petitioner’s opposition are increased to 30 pages.
`
`2. Patent Owner’s proposed format for identifying support for claim limitations in the priority documents is acceptable.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`(571)272-7822
`
`From: Venkat Konda <venkat@kondatech.com>  
`Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 4:08 AM 
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>; Kellogg, Andrew <Andrew.Kellogg@USPTO.GOV> 
`Cc: Modi, Naveen <naveenmodi@paulhastings.com>; FlexLogix Konda PGR <PH‐FlexLogix‐Konda‐
`PGR@paulhastings.com>; Anderson, Paul M. <paulanderson@paulhastings.com>; Venkat Konda 
`<venkat@kondatech.com> 
`Subject: PGR2019‐00037 & 42: Request for more pages ‐ Revised Motion to Amend by Tomorrow May 15, 2020 
`
`To,
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board,
`United States Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`Dear Mr. Kellogg,
`
`Tomorrow May 15, 2020 is the due date, as I, Patent Owner, am intending to submit Patent Owner's Revised
`Motion to Amend.
`I am cc'ing the Petitioner as well. (Since the following two questions are procedural or prior discussed matter, I
`did not contact the Petitioner and cc'ing them in this email).
`I have two procedural questions:
`
`1. For the PO's Motion to Amend submitted on December 11, 2019, Board approved, "In both PGR2019-
`00037 and PGR2019-00042, the page limits for Patent Owner’s motion to amend and for Petitioner’s
`opposition to Patent Owner’s motion to amend are increased to 30 pages". Is this valid for Revised
`Motion to Amend as well? If not, I would like to request page limit extension to 30 pages for both the
`proceedings just like for Motion to Amend on December 11, 2019.
`2. Also I have a question, regarding the format of Revised Motion to Amend:
`
`1
`
`Ex. 3002
`PGR2019-00037
`
`

`

`1. To explain my question, I am using the attached Motion to Amend submitted on December 11,
`2019 as a sample.
`2. First I ADDED line numbers to each page of the Substitute claims in the Appendix I Page # 1 -
`Page # 24 (Please refer to Appendix I # 1 - Page #24 of the attached sample document)
`3. Next, In the table, within the 30 pages allowed, the original table (please refer to Pages 8-9 in the
`Motion pages of the attached sample document) needs to be modified with corresponding
`columns for each of the priority application. So this will add 3 more columns to the table. To
`accommodate 3 more columns I have removed the "Amended Claim language" in the first
`column of that table titled "Reference to the pages/lines to Claim Language in Appendix I" and
`replaced with page/line numbers (for example: Page 2:21 - Page 3:3 in the first row and first
`column of the attached sample document in Page 9). PLEASE LET ME KNOW if this is the
`correct way of submitting Revised Motion to Amend.
`
`Your guidance is critical for me as a Pro se Patent Owner. Please advise.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`Venkat Konda
`Patent owner for PGR2019-000437 & 42
`Email: venkat@kondatech.com
`Phone # 408-472-3273
`
`
`--
`
`NOTICE: This e-mail and any attached documents are CONFIDENTIAL and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
`addressed, and may be a communication privileged by law. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
`all copies from your system. Any review, use, retention, dissemination, distribution, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. Thank
`You.
`
`2
`
`