throbber
Deposition of:
`David J Greenblatt , M.D.
`
`July 2, 2020
`
`In the Matter of:
`Teva Pharmaceuticals vs. Corcept
`Therapeutics
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`800-734-5292 | calendar-dmv@veritext.com |
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 1
`
`

`

` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` _____________________
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Page 1
`
` TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
`
` Petitioner
`
` v.
`
` CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS, INC.
`
` Patent Owner
`
` PGR2019-00048
`
` Patent No. 10,195,214
`
` _____________
`
` Thursday, July 2, 2020
`
` Deposition of DAVID J. GREENBLATT,
`
` M.D., taken virtually via Zoom, at the
`
` home of David J. Greenblatt, M.D., beginning at
`
` 11:04 a.m., before Ryan K. Black, a Registered
`
` Professional Reporter, Certified Livenote
`
` Reporter and Notary Public in and for the
`
` Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 2
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
` STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX, P.L.L.C.
` BY: DEBORAH STERLING, PH.D., ESQ - Via Zoom
` WILLIAM H. MILLIKEN, ESQ - Via Zoom
` 1100 New York Avenue NW
` Washington, DC 20005
` 202.371,2600
` dsterling@sternekessler.com
` wmilliken@sternekessler.com
`
` Representing - Petitioner Teva Pharmaceuticals
` USA, Inc.
`
` QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP
` BY: ERIC STOPS, ESQ - Via Zoom
` JOHN GALANEK, ESQ - Via Zoom
` 51 Madison Avenue
` 22nd Floor
` New York, New York 10010
` 212.849.7150
` ericstops@quinnemanuel.com
` johngalanek@quinnemanuel.com
`
` Representing - Patent Owner Corcept
` Therapeutics, Inc.
` Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 3
`
`

`

` I N D E X
`
` TESTIMONY OF: DAVID J. GREENBLATT, M.D. PAGE
`
` By Mr. Stops...................................4
`
`Page 3
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
` PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS
`
` EXHIBIT PAGE
`
` 1067...........................................6
`
` 1015..........................................33
`
` 1004..........................................46
`
` 2036..........................................54
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4 5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 4
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 4
`
` Whereupon --
`
` * * *
`
` DAVID J. GREENBLATT, M.D.,
`
` called to testify, having been first duly sworn
`
` or affirmed via Zoom video conference, was
`
` examined and testified as follows:
`
` * * *
`
` EXAMINATION
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Good morning, Dr. Greenblatt.
`
` A. Good morning.
`
` Q. As you'll recall, my name is Eric
`
` Stops. This will be your second deposition in
`
` this proceeding, correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. And you're appearing today in this PGR
`
` proceeding on behalf of Teva, correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. Have you had any remote depositions
`
` taken before today?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Okay. And where are you physically
`
` located this morning?
`
` A. I'm in my home in a room in the
`
` basement.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 5
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Q. Okay. Is there anyone that's involved
`
` in this matter physically present with you this
`
`Page 5
`
` morning?
`
` A. No.
`
` Q. Okay. Now, you should have received a
`
` box of paper documents from us for use in your
`
` deposition. Did you receive that box?
`
` A. I did.
`
` Q. Okay. If you haven't already, could
`
` you open up the box?
`
` A. It's open.
`
` Q. Excellent.
`
` And does the box contain manila
`
` folders with numbers on the folders?
`
` A. It does.
`
` Q. And there are documents in the
`
` folders?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. Okay. And just for your information,
`
` the numbers on the folders are the exhibit
`
` numbers that the parties have been using in this
`
` PGR proceeding. That's just for your reference.
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And could you confirm that you haven't
`
` written on, highlighted, flagged or otherwise
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 6
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 6
`
` marked up the documents in the box?
`
` A. The only thing I did was write the
`
` document number on the lower right up to the
`
` upper right so that I can see it.
`
` Q. Understood. Okay.
`
` And for your deposition today,
`
` I'm going to need you to use the copy of the
`
` documents from the box. So to the extent you
`
` have any other marked-up copies of documents,
`
` notes or other materials relating to this
`
` matters, please set those aside for the duration
`
` of the deposition. Okay?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Okay. So in your box of documents,
`
` would you locate Exhibit Number 1067? That
`
` should be your second declaration.
`
` A. Yes, I have it.
`
` MR. STOPS: Okay. And give me one
`
` moment. I'm also going to move the document in
`
` the electronic system into the marked exhibits
`
` folder.
`
` (Previously marked Exhibit No. 1067,
`
` Dr. Greenblatt's second declaration, was
`
` introduced electronically.)
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 7
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 7
`
` Q. Okay. And, Dr. Greenblatt, are you
`
` -- just for the purpose of the deposition, do
`
` you want to use, to the extent possible, just
`
` the paper documents, or are you also using the
`
` electronic system, as well?
`
` A. I would like to use only paper.
`
` Q. All right.
`
` A. And if you can screen share, instead
`
` of getting me into the Veritext thing, that
`
` would be good.
`
` MR. STOPS: Okay. I think that will
`
` work out just fine.
`
` And just, I guess this is a question
`
` for Deb and Ryan for this, if we're relying on
`
` the paper documents, Deb, do you also have them,
`
` or would you like me to have those put into the
`
` electronic system, as well?
`
` MS. STERLING: I have them, because I
`
` received a box. But it might be better for
`
` those following along if you dropped them into
`
` the folder.
`
` MR. STOPS: That's true. And it will
`
` also make it easier for Ryan, as well.
`
` THE REPORTER: Yes.
`
` MR. STOPS: So I will do that. I will
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 8
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 8
`
` put them both into the electronic system, as
`
` well as identifying the paper documents.
`
` VERITEXT TECHNICIAN: And if I can
`
` just add to this without interrupting too much,
`
` the act of moving it into the exhibits folder
`
` actually marks it as an exhibit on the PDF, as
`
` well.
`
` MR. STOPS: Understood. I believe
`
` that virtually all, if not all of the documents
`
` we talked about today, are documents that are
`
` already marked as exhibits in the proceeding,
`
` so it should be --
`
` VERITEXT TECHNICIAN: Sorry for the
`
` interruption.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Okay. So back to business.
`
` Dr. Greenblatt, can you identify the
`
` Exhibit 1067 for me?
`
` A. Yes, I have it. It's the -- it's just
`
` what you said. It's the second declaration of
`
` myself.
`
` Q. Excellent.
`
` Would you turn to Paragraph 6 of your
`
` second declaration? It's on Page 2.
`
` A. Yes.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 9
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 9
`
` Q. And in Paragraph 6 of your second
`
` declaration, you list the materials that you
`
` considered in preparing your deposition
`
` -- sorry, in preparing your declarations,
`
` correct?
`
` A. Both declarations.
`
` Q. Yes. This is the material that
`
` you've considered in preparing both of your
`
` declarations, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Okay. And you did not review anything
`
` beyond the materials cited in Paragraph 6 in
`
` formulating your opinions, correct?
`
` A. My opinions were adequately formulated
`
` based on what is listed in Paragraph 6, but in
`
` the course of my normal professional activities
`
` continuously dealing with scientific papers, et
`
` cetera, in this area.
`
` Q. Okay. Your specific opinions in this
`
` matter, though, are based on the materials
`
` listed in Paragraph 6, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. Okay. Is there anything else that you
`
` considered specifically for your opinions in
`
` this matter that's not listed in Paragraph 6?
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 10
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 10
`
` A. It would be the same answer. I mean,
`
` I am continuously in contact with scientific
`
` literature, not in the context of the case, but
`
` normal professional activities, that have to do
`
` with CYP3A and drug interactions. I did not,
`
` specifically, to my recollection, rely on any of
`
` those, but, nonetheless, that's there.
`
` Q. All right. Maybe I'll ask a slightly
`
` different question, then. You did not review
`
` any materials relating to Mifepristone that form
`
` the basis for your opinions in your expert
`
` declarations beyond those listed in Paragraph 6,
`
` correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` MR. STOPS: Okay. Let's pause for
`
` one second. In my realtime I have a lot of
`
` things that are definitely not English. Is
`
` anybody else seeing this?
`
` MS. STERLING: I, too, am getting a
`
` lot of gibberish transcript.
`
` MR. STOPS: Okay. Is there a easy way
`
` to refresh this, Ryan?
`
` THE REPORTER: I'm not sure. I
`
` think it's coming through Remote Counsel. I'd
`
` have to -- actually, we'd have to go offline for
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 11
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 11
`
` a minute and I'd have to reach out to them and
`
` see if they could help us.
`
` MR. STOPS: Okay. Let me try one
`
` thing. I'm going to refresh that page and see
`
` if that helps. Let's go off the record for a
`
` minute.
`
` (Brief recess.)
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Dr. Greenblatt, in your Paragraph 6
`
` list of materials, the very last item on the
`
` list is Exhibit 2056, correct?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. And Exhibit 2056 is the declaration of
`
` a Dr. Gingrich, correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. And you're aware that declaration of
`
` Dr. Gingrich was submitted on behalf of the
`
` patent owner, correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. You did not review the deposition
`
` transcript of Dr. Gingrich, correct?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. Did you ask counsel for Dr. Gingrich's
`
` deposition transcript?
`
` A. I did not.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 12
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 12
`
` Q. And you did not review the declaration
`
` of Dr. Carol, which was submitted on behalf of
`
` the patent owner, correct?
`
` A. Not that I can recollect.
`
` Q. And you did not review the deposition
`
` transcript of Dr. Carol, correct?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. You also did not review the
`
` declaration of Dr. Katznelson that was submitted
`
` on behalf of patent owner, correct?
`
` A. That's correct.
`
` Q. And you did not review the deposition
`
` transcript of Dr. Katznelson, correct?
`
` A. Did you just say the same thing, or
`
` did you say --
`
` Q. My first question was on the
`
` declaration of Dr. Katznelson. My second
`
` question was on the deposition transcript of
`
` Dr. Katznelson. It was, you did not review the
`
` deposition transcript of Dr. Katznelson,
`
` correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. And you did not review the declaration
`
` of Dr. Dobbs, which was submitted on behalf of
`
` petitioner, correct?
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 13
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 13
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. And you did not review the deposition
`
` transcript of Dr. Dobbs, correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. You also did not speak with Dr. Dobbs
`
` in formulating your opinions for this case, or,
`
` rather, this proceeding, correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. Other than counsel, you did not speak
`
` with anyone in formulating your opinions for
`
` this proceeding, correct?
`
` A. I spoke with counsel, but I formulated
`
` my own opinion.
`
` Q. Yes. So I was just asking you in
`
` terms of if there was anyone other than counsel
`
` that you spoke with in formulating your
`
` opinions?
`
` A. No one else.
`
` Q. Okay. Thank you.
`
` And you did not review any clinical
`
` practice guidelines for the treatment of
`
` Cushing's Syndrome in formulating your opinions,
`
` correct?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: Correct. Sorry. That
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 14
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 14
`
` is correct.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. And did you not review any journal
`
` articles regarding the treatment of Cushing's
`
` Syndrome in formulating your opinions, correct?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection; form.
`
` THE WITNESS: That's correct.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Now, in Paragraph 4 of your second
`
` declaration, you note that Corcept has proposed
`
` a definition for the person of ordinary skill in
`
` the art that differs from your definition,
`
` correct?
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. And you're comfortable with the use
`
` of the acronym POSA for the person of ordinary
`
` skill in the art, correct?
`
` A. Yes. Correct.
`
` Q. And you disagree with Corcept's
`
` proposed definition of the POSA, correct?
`
` A. In part.
`
` Q. Yes. And the part that you disagree
`
` with is the Corcept's requirement of a medical
`
` professional with experience treating Cushing's
`
` Syndrome, correct?
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 15
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 15
`
` A. Correct.
`
` Q. So it is your opinion that a medical
`
` professional with experience treating Cushing's
`
` Syndrome does not need to be part of the POSA or
`
` POSA team, correct?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: Not correct.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. My understanding if -- okay.
`
` Does a medical professional with
`
` experience treating Cushing's Syndrome need to
`
` be part of the POSA or POSA team?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: Going to my own concept
`
` of POSA, it utilizes a team approach. And an
`
` individual of that type could be called upon and
`
` included, if necessary, but it's not obligatory.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Okay. So under your definition of the
`
` person of skill in the art, or person of skill
`
` in the art team, it is not obligatory to include
`
` a medical professional with experience treating
`
` Cushing's Syndrome; is that right?
`
` MS. STERLING: Object to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: Sorry.
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 16
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` Same answer. I feel it is not
`
` obligatory, but such a person could participate,
`
`Page 16
`
` if needed.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Okay. And is such a person needed for
`
` the purposes of rendering the opinions contained
`
` in your declarations?
`
` A. I believe not.
`
` Q. Okay. In Paragraph 7 of your
`
` declaration, you list drug-drug interaction
`
` study variables that come from Dr. Gingrich's
`
` declaration, correct?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: Could you say that
`
` again?
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Sure.
`
` In Paragraph 7 of your second
`
` declaration, you quote Dr. Gingrich's
`
` declaration where he lists a series of drug
`
` interaction study variables, correct?
`
` A. Yes, I have a quote from Dr. Gingrich.
`
` Q. And the quote from Dr. Gingrich
`
` concerns variables used in drug interaction
`
` studies, correct?
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 17
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: Well, it is the list of
`
`Page 17
`
` such things, yes.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Okay. I guess, as an initial matter,
`
` based on your experience, are there any
`
` additional factors or variables that should be
`
` added to this list?
`
` A. I can't exclude it, but I would have
`
` to take some time to sit down and think about,
`
` if I thought it was useful to construct such a
`
` list, what might be added.
`
` Q. Okay. You have not done that exercise
`
` yet, correct?
`
` A. That's correct. I have not done such
`
` an exercise.
`
` Q. Okay. And there's no factors or
`
` variables that you would add sitting here today
`
` without further time to reflect; is that
`
` correct?
`
` A. I think I just answered that. I would
`
` need to think -- if I were to construct a list,
`
` if I thought it was useful to construct a list,
`
` I would have to consider what might be added.
`
` Q. Okay. And the variables that
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 18
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 18
`
` Dr. Gingrich had cited in the quotation in your
`
` declaration, those come from the 2006 Drug
`
` Interaction Guidance, correct?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection; foundation.
`
` Form.
`
` THE WITNESS: That I don't know. I
`
` haven't cross-checked.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Okay. Okay.
`
` You're aware that there are variables
`
` or factors listed in the 2006 drug interaction
`
` guidance, correct?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection; form.
`
` THE WITNESS: I am aware, yes.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Okay. In your opinion, are all drug
`
` interaction studies routine?
`
` A. In my opinion, no study is routine.
`
` A study has to be -- the design of a study
`
` has to be thought through and the variables
`
` considered and the study is designed. That
`
` takes some thought, and that's not like you do
`
` it in 30 seconds. But, in general, for any
`
` particular question, a study can be designed.
`
` Q. Okay. In Paragraph 8, you state on
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 19
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` the very bottom of Page 5, you refer to the, "in
`
` my field." Do you see those lines at the very
`
`Page 19
`
` bottom of Page 5?
`
` A. Yes.
`
` Q. What do you mean by, "your field," for
`
` that, in this context?
`
` A. Well, in general, the field of
`
` clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics drug
`
` interactions, metabolic inhibition and induction
`
` and these are things that a POSA would deal
`
` with.
`
` Q. Okay. All right. I'm just trying to
`
` read from the screen.
`
` In Paragraph 10 of your second
`
` declaration on Page 6, you begin your discussion
`
` of the variables or factors for drug interaction
`
` study designs, correct?
`
` A. Well, I think Paragraph 10 stands as
`
` stated; for example, with respect to the first
`
` variable, study design, and it goes on.
`
` Q. Sure.
`
` The paragraph, and I believe it goes
`
` from Paragraph 10 through Paragraph 20 of your
`
` report, concern your opinions on the variables
`
` used in drug interaction studies, correct?
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 20
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 20
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection to form, and
`
` to the extent it misstates testimony.
`
` THE WITNESS: Well, I think I would
`
` just leave the content of Paragraphs 10 through
`
` 20 as they are. I mean, each one considers a
`
` point and discusses it. So I would stand by
`
` that content.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Okay. Now, you could have discussed
`
` the variables used in drug interaction studies
`
` in your first declaration, correct?
`
` A. How do you mean, "I could have?"
`
` Q. This discussion of -- of the variables
`
` used in drug interaction studies could have been
`
` part of your first declaration, correct?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection; form.
`
` Relevance.
`
` THE WITNESS: Well, this declaration
`
` is -- you know, stands on its own. I mean, it's
`
` -- you know, the first declaration is what it is
`
` and it stands on its own. So I don't know how
`
` to answer that. I mean, I could have -- I guess
`
` -- I don't know.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Well, I mean, why didn't you include a
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 21
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 21
`
` discussion on drug interaction study variables
`
` in your first declaration?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection; form.
`
` Relevance.
`
` THE WITNESS: If I didn't, I don't
`
` know.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Okay. In Paragraph 12 of your second
`
` declaration, you state at the very end, "the
`
` study will be expected to yield a reliable
`
` result."
`
` Do you see that sentence?
`
` A. I do.
`
` Q. What did you mean by, "a reliable
`
` result?"
`
` A. Well, a result that's scientifically
`
` valid and interpretable.
`
` Q. Just so I'm clear, could you give me
`
` an example of the opposite? When would a result
`
` be unreliable?
`
` A. I really can't answer that, because I
`
` generally don't try to design studies like that.
`
` Q. Understood.
`
` Have you reviewed or seen any
`
` drug interaction studies that you would have
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 22
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 22
`
` considered resulting in an unreliable result?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: My expectation is, yes.
`
` But I cannot, at this point, point to any.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Can two studies that are
`
` scientifically valid yield opposite results?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: Well, I don't think that
`
` opposite is the right word. The point is that
`
` two studies can be well-executed with proper
`
` designs and yield scientifically accurate and
`
` interpretable results, yet the two different
`
` studies might not agree. That doesn't mean that
`
` they're opposite, but they might not fully
`
` agree.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Okay. How is it that two studies that
`
` are scientifically valid could yield results
`
` that do not fully agree?
`
` A. Well, let's say the studies were done
`
` at different sites, in different laboratories
`
` using different subjects using different doses
`
` of the same drug using different kinds of study
`
` designs, analytical methods, statistical
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 23
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 23
`
` methods. So they may be studying the same
`
` subject, and both give reliable results in their
`
` context, but they don't necessarily have to
`
` agree a hundred percent.
`
` Q. Okay. So different factors in
`
` different analyses can yield different results,
`
` correct?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection to form.
`
` THE WITNESS: I would stick with the
`
` answer I just gave.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Okay. Sir, two drug interaction
`
` studies that were done under different
`
` conditions could both be scientifically valid,
`
` yet yield results that do not agree, correct?
`
` MS. STERLING: Objection; form.
`
` Misstates testimony.
`
` THE WITNESS: My prior answer stands,
`
` and a drug interaction study is a study. So
`
` that's encompassed in the prior answer.
`
` BY MR. STOPS:
`
` Q. Do you agree that two drug interaction
`
` studies that were done under different
`
` conditions could both be scientifically valid
`
` yet yield results that do not agree?
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`215-241-1000 ~ 610-434-8588 ~ 302-571-0510 ~ 202-803-8830
`
`Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`PGR2019-00048
`Corcept Ex. 2070, Page 24
`
`

`

`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket