throbber
Filed on behalf of: Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
`
`Filed: June 16, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________________
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`_______________________
`
`Case PGR2019-00048
`U.S. Patent No. 10,195,214
`_______________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION OF DANIEL C. WIESNER
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00048
`U.S. Patent No. 10,195,214
`
`Patent Owner Corcept Therapeutics (“Corcept”) hereby moves pursuant to
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) and the authorization provided by the Board in Paper No. 3,
`
`for the admission pro hac vice of Daniel C. Wiesner in the present Post Grant
`
`Review, such that he may be appointed additional back-up counsel for Patent
`
`Owner.
`
`I.
`
`TIME FOR FILING
`
`Pursuant to the authorization provided in Paper No. 3, this motion for pro
`
`hac vice admission is being filed no sooner than twenty-one (21) days after service
`
`of the Petition.
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`Mr. Wiesner is a member in good standing of the State Bar of New York,
`
`and has practiced patent litigation since 2004. Ex. 2068 ¶ 1.
`
`Mr. Wiesner has never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body. Id. ¶ 2.
`
`Mr. Wiesner has never had any application for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body denied. Id. ¶ 3.
`
`Mr. Wiesner has never been the subject of any sanctions or contempt
`
`citations imposed by any court or administrative body. Id. ¶ 4.
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00048
`U.S. Patent No. 10,195,214
`
`Mr. Wiesner has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.
`
`Id. ¶ 5.
`
`Mr. Wiesner understands that he will be subject to the USPTO Code of
`
`Professional Responsibility and disciplinary jurisdiction. Id. ¶ 6.
`
`Mr. Wiesner has previously applied to appear pro hac vice before the Patent
`
`and Trademark Office in Actavis LLC v. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC, IPR2017-
`
`01101, IPR2017-01103, IPR2017-01104 (PTAB), and was admitted. Id. ¶ 7.
`
`Mr. Wiesner has an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in
`
`this Post Grant Review. Mr. Wiesner is trial counsel for Corcept in the patent
`
`litigation against Teva concerning the patent challenged in the petition (Corcept
`
`Therapeutics, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et. al, No. 2:18-cv-03632-
`
`SDW-CLW (D.N.J.)). Id. ¶ 8. As such, Mr. Wiesner has obtained substantial
`
`familiarity with the involved patent, the prior art, and the various issues raised in
`
`this Post Grant Review. Id. Patent Owner has a substantial need for Mr.
`
`Wiesner’s pro hac vice admission and his continued involvement in this
`
`proceeding.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, there is good cause to admit Mr. Wiesner on a pro
`
`hac vice basis to serve as additional back-up counsel for Corcept. Accordingly,
`
`2
`
`

`

`Patent Owner respectfully requests that this Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`PGR2019-00048
`U.S. Patent No. 10,195,214
`
`be granted.
`
`Date: August 13, 2020
`
`F. Dominic Cerrito (Reg. No. 38,100)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel: (212) 849-7000
`Fax: (212) 849-7100
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Eric C. Stops (Reg. No. 51,163)
`Frank C. Calvosa (Reg. No. 69,064)
`John Galanek (Reg. No. 74,512)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel: (212) 849-7000
`Fax: (212) 849-7100
`Back-Up Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`3
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00048
`U.S. Patent No. 10,195,214
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________________
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`_______________________
`
`Case PGR2019-00048
`U.S. Patent No. 10,195,214
`_______________________
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00048
`U.S. Patent No. 10,195,214
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on the date indicated below a copy of the
`
`foregoing Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Daniel C.
`
`Wiesner was served electronically by e-mailing copies to counsel of record for
`
`Petitioners at dsterling-PTAB@sternekessler.com, opartington-
`
`PTAB@sternekessler.com, jcrozendaal-PTAB@sternekessler.com, ueverett-
`
`PTAB@sternekessler.com, wmilliken-PTAB@sternekessler.com.
`
`Date: August 13, 2020
`
`F. Dominic Cerrito (Reg. No. 38,100)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel: (212) 849-7000
`Fax: (212) 849-7100
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Eric C. Stops (Reg. No. 51,163)
`Daniel C. Wiesner (pro hac vice)
`Frank C. Calvosa (Reg. No. 69,064)
`John Galanek (Reg. No. 74,512)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel: (212) 849-7000
`Fax: (212) 849-7100
`Back-Up Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket