throbber
Paper No. 14
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: September 20, 2019
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case PGR2019-00048
`Patent 10,195,214 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before JAQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, Deputy Chief Administrative
`Patent Judge, ROBERT A. POLLOCK, and DAVID COTTA,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COTTA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00048
`Patent 10,195,214 B2
`
` ANALYSIS
`On May 7, 2019, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (“Petitioner”) filed
`a Petition requesting post-grant review of U.S. Patent No. 10,195,214 B2.
`Paper 2. On August 23, 2019, Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. (“Patent Owner”)
`filed a Preliminary Response. Paper 8. On September 11, 2019, the Board
`received an email in which Petitioner requested “authorization to file a 3-
`page reply to Corcept’s Preliminary Patent Owner Response to address
`certain statements in Corcept’s POPR that mischaracterize the schedule of
`the concurrent litigation involving the ’214 patent.” Ex. 3001. In that email,
`Petitioner represented that Patent Owner would not oppose Petitioner’s
`request for a Reply if Petitioner did not oppose a request from Patent Owner
`to file a 3-page Sur-Reply. Id. Petitioner further represented that it did not
`oppose a Sur-Reply. Id. In an email dated September 12, 2019, we
`authorized Petitioner to file a three (3) page Reply to be filed on or before
`September 23, 2019. Id. We also authorized Patent Owner to file a three (3)
`page Sur-Reply to be filed on or before October 3, 2019. We stated that we
`would issue an order to that effect in due course. Id.
`II. ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing and in view of our email to the
`parties of September 12, 2019, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner is
`authorized to file a Reply of not more than three (3) pages to Patent Owner’s
`Preliminary Response. Petitioner’s Reply shall be limited to the subject
`matter of the schedule of the concurrent litigation and shall be filed on or
`before September 23, 2019. Patent Owner is authorized to file a Sur-Reply
`of not more than three (3) pages. Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply shall be limited
`
`2
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00048
`Patent 10,195,214 B2
`to the subject matter of Petitioner’s Reply and shall be filed on or before
`October 3, 2019.
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Deborah Sterling
`Olga Partington
`STERNE KESSLER GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`dsterling-ptab@sternekessler.com
`opartington-ptab@sternekessler.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Francis Cerrito
`Frank Calvosa
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`nickcerrito@quinnemanuel.com
`frankcalvosa@quinnemanuel.com
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket