throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 9
` Date: May 20, 2020
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SHIELDMARK, INC.
`Petitioner,
`v.
`CLIFFORD A. LOWE
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`PGR2019-00058
`Patent 10,214,664 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI, and
`SHELDON M. MCGEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MCGEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00058
`Patent 10,214,664 B2
`
`On April 8, 2020, the Board’s electronic filing system, PTABE2E,
`
`sent an email to the parties stating that a Request for Rehearing had been
`filed in this proceeding. The email also indicated, in all capital letters,
`“THERE WERE NO DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED WITH THIS
`REQUEST.” Ex. 3001.
`
`On May 13, 2020, the Board contacted the parties as follows:
`
`On April 8, 2020, it appears that Petitioner initiated the process
`of filing a request for rehearing in PTABE2E. However, no
`actual document was filed. Petitioner is requested to indicate
`whether it intended to file a request for rehearing, and if so,
`explain why no document was filed and whether it now seeks to
`submit a request for rehearing late. To the extent that Petitioner
`wishes the Board to accept the late filing of a request for
`rehearing, the parties shall meet and confer on that issue and
`propose mutually available times for a conference call on May
`18–21, 2020.
`
`
`
`The parties requested a call with the Board and on May 19, 2020,
`Judges Crumbley, Kokoski, and McGee held a call with counsel to address
`whether the Board should accept the late filing of Petitioner’s Request for
`Rehearing. Petitioner’s counsel represented Petitioner had intended to file a
`Request for Rehearing, believed it had timely done so, and that a copy was
`timely served on Patent Owner’s counsel on April 8, 2020. During the
`conference call, Patent Owner’s counsel confirmed that Patent Owner was
`timely served with Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing on April 8, 2020, and
`that it opposes Petitioner’s request that the Board accept the late filing of
`Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing. Both parties indicated that they believed
`Petitioner’s Request was properly filed with the Board until receiving the
`Board’s May 13, 2020 email.
`
`2
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00058
`Patent 10,214,664 B2
`
`During the conference call, the Board authorized Petitioner to file a
`
`motion to accept the late filing of the Request for Rehearing that was served
`on Patent Owner April 8, 2020, along with a copy of the Request for
`Rehearing. The motion should explain the circumstances that led to the
`filing error, and set forth why good cause exists for the Board to accept the
`late filing. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(c)(3) (“A late action will be excused on a
`showing of good cause or upon a Board decision that consideration of the
`merits would be in the interests of justice.”). The motion may not exceed
`three pages in length and is due within five business days of the conference
`call, i.e., no later than May 27, 2020. We also authorized Patent Owner to
`file an opposition to Petitioner’s motion, also limited to three pages and due
`within five business days after Petitioner’s motion is filed with the Board.
`Patent Owner’s opposition, if filed, shall explain what prejudice Patent
`Owner has suffered or will suffer if Petitioner’s motion is granted.
`
`
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner is authorized to file a motion to accept the
`late filing of its Request for Rehearing, not exceeding three pages in length,
`along with a copy of the Request for Rehearing as served upon Patent
`Owner’s counsel, no later than May 27, 2020;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is authorized to file an
`opposition to Petitioner’s motion, not exceeding three pages in length,
`within five business days after Petitioner’s motion is filed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`PGR2019-00058
`Patent 10,214,664 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Howard Wernow
`Rich Megley
`Joseph Sebolt
`howard.wernow@sswip.com
`rmegley@leesheikh.com
`joe.sebolt@sswip.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Ray L. Weber
`Laura J Gentilcore
`rlweber@rennerkenner.com
`ljgentilcore@rennerkenner.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket