`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 22
`Entered: December 8, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`PEBBLE TIDE, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`PGR2020-00011
`Patent 10,303,411 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, DAVID C. MCKONE,
`and CHRISTOPHER L. OGDEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`MCKONE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Increasing Page Limit of Opposition to Motion to Amend
`37 C.F.R. § 42.24
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PGR2020-00011
`Patent 10,303,411 B2
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`Unified Patents (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition (Paper 1, “Pet.”)
`requesting post-grant review (“PGR”) of claims 1–20 of U.S. Patent
`No. 10,303,411 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’411 patent”). Pet. 5. We instituted an
`inter partes review of claims 1–20 of the ’411 patent. Paper 12 (“Dec.”).
`Pebble Tide LLC (“Patent Owner”) filed a Motion to Amend (Paper 18,
`“Mot. to Amend”) seeking to substitute claims 21–35 for claims 1–3, 5, 6,
`8–11, 13, 14, 16–18, and 20 of the ’411 patent.
`According to our rules, a motion to amend and an opposition to such a
`motion are both limited to 25 pages. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.24(a)(1)(vi),
`42.24(b)(3). Motions to amend, like all documents created for one of our
`proceedings, must comply with our general formatting requirements,
`including the use of 14-point Times New Roman proportional font and
`double spacing. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(2). By email, Petitioner contends
`that the Motion to Amend is formatted such that it effectively has more than
`25 pages. Petitioner requests that the page limit for its opposition to the
`Motion to Amend be increased by 8 pages, to 33 pages. Petitioner
`represents that Patent Owner does not oppose this request and that the
`parties have agreed to Petitioner’s proposal to avoid a dispute on Petitioner’s
`page-limit contentions regarding the Motion to Amend.
`In light of the parties’ agreement, we authorize an eight-page increase
`to the page limit for Petitioner’s opposition to the Motion to Amend, i.e., to
`33 pages. Petitioner’s opposition must comply with our general formatting
`requirements in Rule 42.6(a)(2). Likewise, any reply from Patent Owner
`must comply with our general formatting requirements in Rule 42.6(a)(2)
`and the page limit of Rule 42.24(c)(3).
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`PGR2020-00011
`Patent 10,303,411 B2
`
`II. ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the page limit for Petitioner’s opposition to Patent
`Owner’s Motion to Amend is increased by 8 pages, i.e., to 33 pages.
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Jung Hahm
`Roshan Mansinghani
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC
`jung@unifiedpatents.com
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Isaac Rabicoff
`RABICOFF LAW LLC
`isaac@rabilaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
