`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Counsel,
`
`Trials
`Monday, April 12, 2021 1:44 PM
`Isaac Rabicoff; Trials
`Jung Hahm
`RE: Unopposed Leave to Move for Adverse Judgment re PGR2020-00011
`
`Patent Owner may file a Motion for Adverse Judgment. Under Rule 42.73(b), Patent Owner need not seek permission to
`file such a motion, and may request judgment against itself at any time during the proceeding. The parties also are
`authorized to file a joint request to cancel the April 14, 2021, oral argument. If the parties do not file such a request, the
`argument shall proceed as scheduled.
`
`Regards,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`(571)272-7822
`
`From: Isaac Rabicoff <isaac@rabilaw.com>
`Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 11:19 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Jung Hahm <jung@unifiedpatents.com>
`Subject: Unopposed Leave to Move for Adverse Judgment re PGR2020‐00011
`
`Your Honors:
`
`Patent Owner requests leave to Move for Adverse Judgment under § 42.73(b), based on mootness, given that
`this Motion was filed after the Federal Circuit appeal was dismissed. As such, the Board need not reach the
`merits of this Motion.
`
`Should the Board grant this request for relief, we believe that these proceedings should be terminated given that
`Petitioner's original petition is also moot based on the same grounds.
`
`Petitioner does not oppose this request.
`
`Additionally, the parties also agree that the 4/14 Oral Argument need not be held in light of Patent Owner's
`request for Adverse Judgment.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Isaac Rabicoff
`Rabicoff Law LLC
`www.RabiLaw.com
`
`1
`
`
`
`5680 King Centre Dr, Suite 645
`Alexandria, VA 22315
`773.669.4590
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
