throbber

`California Exotic Pest Plant Council
`
`1996 Symposium Proceedings
`
`Why Herbicides Are Selective
`
`David W. Cudney
`Department of Botany and Plant Sciences
`University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0124
`
`
`
`
`
`Selective herbicides have been used extensively since the introduction of 2,4-D in the late '40s. They have
`been one of the miracles of modem agriculture, releasing thousands of people from the drudgery of hand
`weeding. A selective herbicide is one that kills or retards the growth of an unwanted plant or "weed" while
`causing little or no injury to desirable species. 2,4-D used in turf will kill many of the broadleaf weeds that
`infest turf while not significantly injuring the turfgrass. But selectivity is a fickle, dynamic process. Excessive
`rates of 2,4-D applied to stressed turfgrass may injure the turf.
`Selectivity has always depended on proper herbicide application. Normally herbicides work selectively
`within a given rate of application. Too little herbicide and no weed control, too much and crop injury may
`occur. But selectivity is more complex than this. It is a dynamic process that involves the interaction of the
`plant, the herbicide, and the environment.
`
`
`The Plant
`
`
`
`Factors that involve plant response include: genetic inheritance, age, growth rate, morphology, physiology,
`and biochemistry. The genetic make-up of a plant determines how that plant responds to herbicides and its
`environment. The age of the plant often determines how well an herbicide works, older plants are generally
`much more difficult to control than seedlings. Preemergence herbicides often work only on plants during the
`germination process and will have little effect on older plants. Plants which are growing rapidly are usually
`more susceptible to herbicides.
`The morphology of a plant can help to determine its susceptibility to herbicides. Annual weeds in a deep-
`rooted crop can be controlled because the herbicide is concentrated in the first inch of soil where the weeds
`and weed seeds are. Weeds with exposed growing points may be killed by contact sprays, while grasses with
`protected growing points may be burned back, but escape permanent injury. Certain leaf properties can allow
`better spray retention and thus better kill (broadleaf species vs. grasses or hairy vs. smooth leaves). Sprays
`tend to be retained on pigweed and mustard leaves and bounce off of onion or grass species.
`The physiology of a plant can determine how much of an herbicide will be absorbed onto the plant and the
`speed with which it is transported to its site of action. Plants with thick waxy cuticles or hairy leaf surfaces
`may not absorb sufficient herbicide to be injured. Wetting agents in herbicide formulations are used to combat
`these leaf characteristics and increase absorption. The transport rate of herbicides in plants varies. Usually
`susceptible plants transport herbicide more readily than resistant ones. Some plants can adsorb herbicides
`along the transport pathway, preventing them from reaching their site of action.
`Biochemical reactions also account for selectivity. Most herbicides have a biochemical reaction within
`susceptible plants which accounts for their herbicidal activity. They may bind to critical enzymes within
`susceptible plants and block important metabolic processes (glyphosate), they may block photosynthesis
`(diuron) or respiration, or they may affect cell division (trifluralin). Herbicides may be absorbed as relatively
`innocuous chemicals (2,4-DB) and activated to deadly compounds (2,4-D) within susceptible plants. Other
`herbicides (atrazine) may be detoxified within some plants (com) while killing weeds which fail to metabolize
`the herbicide.
`
`
`
`
`Herbicides are quite specific in their structures as to whether or not herbicidal activity is possible. Slight
`changes in conformation or structure will alter herbicidal activity. Trifluralin and benefin differ in only a
`
`The Herbicide
`
`Page 1
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1011
`Syngenta v. FMC, PGR2020-00028
`
`

`

`
`California Exotic Pest Plant Council
`
`1996 Symposium Proceedings
`
`methyl group moved from one side of the molecule to the other, yet trifluralin is about twice as active as
`benefin. Esters of phenoxy (MCPP etc.) acids are usually much more active than are amines. The manner of
`formulation of an herbicide can affect its selectivity. The most extreme case of this might be granular
`formulations which bounce off desirable plants to reach the soil where they then limit germinating weeds.
`Other substances known as adjuvants or surfactants are often added to improve the application properties of a
`liquid formulation and increase activity.
`The manner in which an herbicide is applied can affect its selectivity. When a broad-spectrum
`postemergence herbicide like glyphosate is applied as a shielded, directed, or wicked application within a
`susceptible crop, susceptible foliage is avoided and selectivity is achieved with this normally non-selective
`herbicide.
`Herbicides can be grouped into families based on the type of action that they have within affected plants
`(their mode of action). Herbicides which affect similar sites or processes within affected plants produce
`similar injury symptoms. The herbicide families listed below are grouped on the basis of how they affect
`plants:
`1. The Growth Regulator Herbicides (2,4-D, MCPP, dicamba, and triclopyr). These are mostly foliar applied
`herbicides which are systemic and translocate in both the xylem and phloem of the plant. They mimic
`natural plant auxins, causing abnormal growth and disruption of the conductive tissues of the plant. The
`injury from this family of herbicides consists of twisted, malformed leaves and stems.
`2. The inhibitors of amino acid synthesis (glyphosate, halosulfuron, imazethapyr, and sulfometuron). Both
`foliar and soil applied herbicides are in this family. Glyphosate translocates in the phloem with
`photosynthate produced in the leaves. Others in this family move readily after root or foliar absorption.
`These herbicides inhibit certain enzymes critical to the production of amino acids. Amino acids are the
`building blocks of proteins. Once protein production stops, growth stops. Symptoms are stunting and
`symptoms associated with lack of critical proteins.
`3. Cell membrane disrupters - with soil activity (oxyfluorfen, lactofen, and acifluorfen). Soil and foliar
`applied with limited movement in soil. These herbicides enter the plant through leaves, stems, and roots,
`but are limited in their movement once they enter the plant. Membrane damage is due to lipid
`peroxidation. Symptoms are necrosis of leaves and stem.
`4. Lipid biosynthesis inhibitors (diclofop, fluazifop, sethoxydim, and clethodim). Foliar applied Diclofop has
`both soil and foliar activity. Herbicides in this family move in both the xylem and phloem of the plant and
`inhibit enzymes critical in the production of lipids. Lipids are necessary to form plant membranes which
`are essential to growth and metabolic processes. Symptoms include stunting and death of tissue within the
`growing points of plants.
`5. Pigment inhibitors (norflurazon, fluridone, and amitrol). Soil applied and move in the xylem except
`amitrol, which moves in both phloem and xylem. These herbicides inhibit carotinoid biosyntehsis, leaving
`chlorophyll unprotected from photooxidation. This results in foliage which lacks color. Symptoms
`include albino or bleached appearance of foliage.
`6. Growth inhibitors of shoots (thiocarbamate herbicides including: EPTC, cycloate, pebulate, and
`molinate). Soil applied and somewhat volatile, requiring incorporation. Enter the plant through the roots
`and translocated through the xylem with the transpiration stream to the growing points in the shoot. Mode
`of action is unclear, but affects developing leaves in growing points of susceptible plants. Symptoms
`include stunting and distortion of seedling leaves.
`7. Herbicides which disrupt cell division (trifluralin, DCPA, dithiopyr, oryzalin, pronamide, pendimethalin,
`and napropamide). All are soil applied, with limited movement in the soil. Absorbed through roots or
`emerging shoot tips. Once absorption takes place, movement is limited (site of action is near the site of
`absorption). These herbicides inhibit cell division or mitosis, except pronamide and napropamide which
`stop cell division before mitosis. Symptoms include stunting and swollen root tips.
`8. Cell membrane disrupters - no soil activity (paraquat, diquat, glufosinate, acids, oils, soaps). These
`herbicides are foliar applied with no soil activity. They enter the plant through the leaves and stems and
`do not move significantly within the plant once absorbed. These herbicides either act directly on cell
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`
`California Exotic Pest Plant Council
`
`1996 Symposium Proceedings
`
`membranes (acids, soaps. oils) or react with a plant process to form destructive compounds which result in
`membrane damage. Symptoms include rapid necrosis of the leaves and stem.
`Inhibitors of photosynthesis (atrazine, simazine, metribuzin, cyanazine, prometryn, diuron, linuron,
`tebuthiuron, and bromacil). These are soil applied herbicides, however, all except simazine also have
`foliar activity. They move readily in the plant in the xylem with the transpiration stream where they
`concentrate in the leaves at the site of photosynthesis. Once there they block the electron transport system
`of photosynthesis, causing a build up of destructive high energy products which destroy chlorophyll and
`ultimately the leaf tissues. Symptoms include chlorotic (yellowed ) leaves which become necrotic.
`
`The Environment
`
`9.
`
`
`
`
`
`There are many ways that the environment interacts with herbicide selectivity. The soil determines how much of
`soil applied herbicides are available for activity. Sandy soils, with low organic content, are much more active and
`conversely less selective than clay soils with high organic content at a given rate of herbicide application. Irrigation
`or rainfall amount and timing influence the depth to which herbicides may move in the soil and plant growth and
`stress, all of which can increase or decrease herbicide selectivity. Temperature affects the rate of herbicide transport,
`the rate of biochemical reactions, plant growth, plant stress, and ultimately herbicide selectivity. Wind, relative
`humidity, insects, plant pathogens, and nutritional status also affect plant growth and stress which can increase or
`decrease herbicide selectivity.
`Herbicide selectivity is truly a dynamic process. It involves complex interactions between the plant, the
`herbicide and the environment.
`
`
`
`Ashton, Floyd M. and W. A. Harvey. 1976. Selective chemical weed control. University of California bulletin 1919. 17 pages.
`Warren, G. F., F D. Hess, et al. 1995 Herbicide action short course at Purdue. Syllabus. 787 pages.
`Tickes, Barry, D. W. Cudney, and C. L. Elmore. 1996. Herbicide injury symptoms. University of Arizona Bulletin 195021.
`
`Suggested Reading
`
`Page 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket