throbber
Addiction Biology (2002) 7, 357–364
`
`INVITED REVIEW
`
`The pharmacology of psilocybin
`
`TORSTEN PASSIE, JUERGEN SEIFERT, UDO SCHNEIDER &
`HINDERK M. EMRICH
`
`Department of Clinical Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical School Hannover, Hannover,
`Germany
`
`Abstract
`Psilocybin (4-phosphoryloxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamin e) is the major psychoactive alkaloid of some species of
`mushrooms distributed worldwide. These mushrooms represent a growing problem regarding hallucinogenic drug
`abuse. Despite its experimental medical use in the 1960s, only very few pharmacological data about psilocybin
`were known until recently. Because of its still growing capacity for abuse and the widely dispersed data this
`review presents all the available pharmacological data about psilocybin.
`
`Introduction
`Psilocybin-containing mushrooms are one of the
`major hallucinogenic drugs of abuse today. These
`mushroom species are distributed worldwide1
`and their abuse potential produces partially
`harmful effects in a growing population of psy-
`chedelic drug users.2 No physical damage but
`many psychiatric complications have been repor-
`ted worldwide.3 Recent research has been repor-
`ted on the treatment of compulsive disorders in
`humans with psilocybin; 4 therefore, it is impor-
`tant to know the essential pharmacological data
`about psilocybin.
`Despite the fact that pure synthetic psilocybin
`(Indocybin® Sandoz) was used and marketed for
`experimental and psychotherapeutic purposes in
`the 1960s, until recently only limited pharmaco-
`logical data were available. In recent years some
`experimental psychophysiological studies were
`performed in which human pharmacokinetic and
`
`pharmacodynamic data of psilocybin were
`explored further.5 –10 Because of the widely dis-
`persed material about the pharmacological prop-
`erties of psilocybin, old and new data are
`reviewed here. It should be noted that character-
`ization of the complex psychopathological phe-
`nomena inudced is not in the focus of this
`review.
`
`Pharmacology of psilocybin
`Psilocybin (4-phosphoryloxy-N,N-dimethyltryp-
`tamine) is a substituted indolealkylamine and
`belongs to the group of hallucinogenic trypta-
`mines. Psilocybin was isolated from Central
`American mushrooms (Psilocybe mexicana) by the
`renowned Swiss chemist Albert Hofmann in
`1957, and in 1958 was produced synthetically for
`the first time.11 It has been found in many species
`of mushrooms worldwide1 (Fig. 1).
`
`Correspondence to: Torsten Passie, Medical School Hannover (Germany), Department of Clinical Psychiatry
`and Psychotherapy, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany. Tel: 0049 511 5323517; Fax: 0049 511
`5322415; E-mail: dr.passie@gmx.de
`Received for publication 15th October 2001. Accepted 30th May 2002.
`
`ISSN 1355-6215 print/ISSN 1369-1600 online/02/040357-08
` Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs
`DOI: 10.1080/1355621021000005937
`
`Taylor & Francis Ltd
`
`EXHIBIT K
`
`

`

`358
`
`T. Passie et al.
`
`Figure 1. Molecular structures of psilocybin and psilocin.
`
`Psychic effects
`In a medium dosage (12–20 mg p.o.), psilocybin
`was found to produce a well-controllable altered
`state of consciousness. This state is marked by
`stimulation of affect, enhanced ability for intro-
`spection and altered psychological functioning in
`the direction of Freudian primary processes,
`known otherwise as hypnagogic experience and
`dreams.12 Especially noteworthy are perceptual
`changes such as illusions, synaestesias, affective
`activation, and alterations of thought and time
`sense. The effects last from 3 to 6 hours.
`After extensive tests in animals and humans,
`psilocybin was distributed worldwide under the
`name Indocybin® (Sandoz) as a short-acting and
`more compatible substance (than, for example,
`LSD)
`to support psychotherapeutic proce-
`dures.13 Experimental and therapeutic use was
`extensive and without complications.14
`
`Somatic effects
`Cerletti15 reported an LD50 for mice with intra-
`venous application of 280 mg/kg which may imply
`an LD50 of some grams of psilocybin in humans.
`In some in vitro experiments, except for an
`inhibitory effect on the neurotransmitter ser-
`otonin, psilocybin showed no specific effects on
`isolated organs (intestines, heart) of guinea pigs
`and rats.15 Characteristic autonomic effects of the
`neurovegetative system that were notable for the
`whole animal (mice, rats, rabbits, cats and dogs)
`with doses of 10 mg/kg s.c. included: mydriasis,
`piloerection, irregularities in heart and breathing
`rate and discrete hyperglycaemic and hypertonic
`effects.15 Cerletti interpreted these effects as an
`
`excitatory syndrome caused by central stimula-
`tion of the sympathetic system. In contrast to an
`autonomic excitatory syndrome, motor behaviour
`was muted.16 –18 Experiments with Rhesus mon-
`keys (2–4 mg/kg i. p.) confirmed the above
`changes of physiological parameters and a central
`excitatory syndrome. After 20–40 minutes the
`EEG showed a disappearance of alpha activity
`and an increase of beta activity in the neo-
`cortex.19 In two early non-blind studies in healthy
`volunteers (n = 12, 0.12–0.15 mg/kg p.o.),20
`(n = 22, 10 mg p.o.)21 the EEG showed variations
`of visual evoked potentials and decrease in alpha
`and theta frequencies. There were no changes in
`the electroretinogram. 21
`The somatic effects in humans were investi-
`gated first by Quetin22 in a non-blind study in
`healthy volunteers (n = 29, 8–12 mg p.o., i.m.).
`The physiological changes which were noted
`regularly are listed in Table 1. These effects were
`confirmed qualitatively by another early non-
`blind study (n = 16, 0.11 mg/kg p.o.).33 Discrete
`changes of RR and pulse were also confirmed in a
`recent double-blind placebo-controlled study
`(n = 8, 0.2 mg/kg p.o.), as shown in Table 2.9 The
`effects described were barely noticeable and
`should be interpreted as secondary pharmaco-
`logical effects, induced mainly by the sympatho-
`mimetic excitation syndrome.24 Hollister et al.25
`found no significant aberrations of the afore-
`mentioned parameters
`in one subject after
`adminstration of psilocybin for 21 consecutive
`days with increasing dosages (1.5 mg increased to
`25 mg p.o. in three doses per day). Electrolyte
`levels, liver toxicity tests and blood sugar levels
`remained unaffected.23 – 25 Human leucocytes
`
`

`

`Table 1. Somatic symptoms
`
`Table 2. Blood pressure and heart rate changes
`
`Pharmacology of psilocybin
`
`359
`
`Percentage of subjects
`
`Midriasis
`Heart frequency
`Accelerated
`Slowed
`Variable
`No change
`Arterial blood pressure
`Hypotension
`Hypertension
`Instability
`No change
`Nausea
`Reflexes tendineae
`Increased
`Decreased
`No change
`Dysmetry
`Tremor
`
`93%
`
`56%
`13%
`31%
`0%
`
`34%
`28%
`22%
`16%
`44%
`
`80%
`6%
`13%
`16%
`25%
`
`Modified from ref. 22. N = 30, 8–12 mg psilocybin i.m.,
`p.o.
`
`were found by Quetin23 (n = 29, 8–12 mg p.o.,
`i.m.) and Hollister et al.25(n = 16, 0.06–0.2 mg/
`kg p.o., s.c.) to be reduced in number temporarily
`between the second and fourth hour after psilocy-
`bin. In a recent double-blind placebo-controlled
`study (n = 8, 0.2 mg/kg p.o.) endocrine activity
`(cortisol, prolactin, growth hormone) was found
`not to be affected significantly by psilocybin. 9
`Experiments in mice (4, 8 and 16 mg/kg) with
`the micronucleus test, highly sensitive to the
`chromosome-breaking potential of substances,
`found no evidence
`for genetic aberrations
`through psilocybin.26 In mutagenicity testing it is
`not possible at present to prove the mutagenic
`potential of a compound in a single test system.
`Results of other tests are required to confirm
`these negative results.
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`Pharmacokinetic studies showed that 50% of
`14C-labelled psilocybin was absorbed following
`oral administration. The isotope is distributed
`almost uniformly
`throughout
`the whole
`body.27,28 As part of a recent double-blind
`placebo-controlled psychopathological
`study
`(n = 13, 0.2 mg/kg p.o.), Holzmann5 assayed psi-
`locybin metabolites in human plasma and urine
`by HPLC as part of an investigation of the
`
`Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
`Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
`Heart rate
`
`Mean/SD
`
`25.9 ± 11.7
`10.0 ± 7.6
`10.4 ± 12.6
`
`From ref. 9. N = 8, 0.2 mg/kg psilocybin p.o.
`
`pharmacokinetics of psilocybin and psilocin. In
`another recent double-blind placebo-controlled
`study (n = 6, 0.5–3 mg i.v.; n = 6 0.22mg/kg p.o.)
`Hasler et al.6 used HPLC with column-switching
`coupled with the electrochemical detection pro-
`cedure for reliable quantitative determination of
`psilocybin metabolites. Altogether, four metabo-
`lites of psilocybin have been identified (Fig. 2):
`
`4-hydroxy-N,N-dimethyltrypt-amine
`(Psilocin);
`4-hydroxyindole-3-yl-acetaldehyde (4H1A);
`(41-IIAA);
`4-hydroxyindole-3-yl-acetic-acid
`and
`4-hydroxytryptophol (41-IT).
`
`According to the two above-mentioned phar-
`macokinetic studies in humans it was found that
`after oral administration (on an empty stomach),
`psilocybin is detectable in significant amounts in
`the plasma within 20–40 minutes. Psychological
`effects occur with plasma levels of 4–6 mg/ml.5,6
`The threshold dose depends on interindividual
`differences, but may be in the range of 3–5 mg
`p.o. for a subjectively detectable sympathomi-
`metic, but not hallucinogenic, effect as found in
`double-blind placebo-controlled trials.29 The full
`effects occur with doses of 8–25 mg p.o. within
`70–90 minutes. Psilocin appears in the plasma
`after 30 minutes. A significant first-pass effect
`with the vast majority of psilocybin converted
`into psilocin mainly by hepatic metabolism can
`be assumed.29 Another early biochemical study
`showed psilocin to be the main, if not the solely
`pharmacologically active substance by decreasing
`the dephosphorylation of psilocybin to psilocin
`using a competetive substrate (beta-glycerophos-
`phate) for blocking the alkaline phosphatase.30
`Recent experimentation on rodent tissue pre-
`sented more evidence for complete conversion of
`psilocybin to psilocin before entering systemic
`circulation.31 This assumption is also supported
`
`d
`d
`d
`d
`

`

`360
`
`T. Passie et al.
`
`Figure 2. Metabolism of psilocybin.
`
`by the finding that equimolar amounts of psilocy-
`bin and psilocin evoke qualitatively and quantita-
`tively similar psychotropic effects in humans.32
`Psilocybin could therefore be referred to as a
`prodrug. However, because of the lack of reliable
`analytical methods for the determination of psilo-
`cybin in human plasma, it was not possible to
`prove this assumption by showing the absence of
`the parent drug in plasma after psilocybin admin-
`istration. After a rapid increase of psilocin plasma
`levels a plateau of about 50 minutes follows, after
`which there is a relatively slow decline of the
`curve, ending at about 360 minutes. This is
`confirmed by the subjective impressions of the
`subjects and Leuner’s diagram of the clinical
`course (Fig. 3).13 An interesting fact may be the
`much shorter half-life (mean 74.1 ± 19.6 minutes
`
`i.v. compared to 163 ± 64 minutes p.o.) and
`duration of action (subjective effects lasting only
`15–30 minutes) when psilocybin is given intra-
`venously, as performed in a recent double-blind
`placebo controlled trial.29
`Despite weight-specific dosage used in recent
`human studies, the plasma concentration-time
`curves indicate highly variable plasma concentra-
`tions. However, the timing of the maximum
`plasma concentration is after approximately 80
`minutes (Fig. 4).6
`The elimination of glucuronidated metabolites
`as well as unaltered psilocybin (3–10%) was
`found to occur through the kidneys. Approx-
`imately two-thirds of the renal excretion of
`psilocin is completed after 3 hours, but with great
`interindividual differences. The mean elimination
`
`

`

`Pharmacology of psilocybin
`
`361
`
`Figure 3. Course of clinical effects of LSD, psilocybin and CZ-74 (a psilocybin-derivative).13
`
`Figure 4. Time-course of plasma levels for psilocin after 0.224 mg/kg body weight psilocybin p.o. (n = 6).6
`
`half-life of psilocin is 50 minutes (Fig. 5, Table
`3).5
`In two early single-blind randomized compar-
`ative studies a dose of 100 mg psilocybin was
`reported as equivalent to 1 mg LSD and 1000 mg
`mescaline.33,34 Even though significant tolerance
`is known to occur with repeated use of psilocybin,
`the development of physical dependence does not
`occur.35,36 Other early single-blind experiments
`showed cross-tolerance of psilocybin and
`LSD.37,38
`
`Pharmacodynamics
`Two recent double-blind placebo controlled PET
`(positron emission tomography) studies using
`[F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose showed brain meta-
`bolic activation under the influence of psilocybin.
`Gouzoulis et al.8 (n = 8, 0.20 mg/kg p.o.) found
`no increase of global brain metabolism, while
`Vollenweider et al.7 (n = 15, 0.26 mg/kg p.o.)
`found a general increase of cortical metabolism.
`Vollenweider et al. found increased metabolism
`bilaterally in the frontomedial and frontolateral
`
`

`

`362
`
`T. Passie et al.
`
`Figure 5. Mean urine excretion rate of psilocin after 0.224 mg/kg psilocybin p.o. (n = 8).6
`
`cortex (24%), as well as in the anterior cingulate
`gyrus (25%), the temporal-medial cortex (25%)
`and the basal ganglia (19%). The smallest increa-
`ses were found in the sensorimotor (15%) and the
`occipital cortex (14%). Furthermore, an increase
`of
`the
`frontal-occipital metabolic gradient
`occurs.7 Regional activation was especially high
`in the right hemispheric frontotemporal cortical
`regions and decreased in the thalamus.8
`Psilocybin interacts mainly with serotonergic
`neurotransmission (5-HT1A, 5-HT1D, 5-HT2A
`and 5-HT2C receptor subtypes). It binds with
`high affinity at 5-HT2A (Ki = 6 nM) and to a
`lesser extent at 5-HT1A (Ki = 190 nM) recep-
`tors.39 It should be noted that psilocybin and its
`active metabolite psilocin have— in contrast to
`the indoleamine LSD—no affinity for dopamine
`D2 receptors.40 A recent double-blind placebo-
`controlled study (n = 15, 0.25 mg/kg p.o.) with
`ketanserin pre-treatment (20 mg/40 mg p.o.)
`showed that the psychotomimetic effects of psilo-
`cybin can be blocked completely using the
`preferential 5HT2A receptor antagonist ketan-
`serin.41 It is probable, therefore, that the effects
`of psilocybin are mediated mainly via activation
`
`of presynaptic 5HT2A receptors. However, pre-
`treatment with the D2 receptor antagonist halo-
`peridol also reduces psilocybin-induced psycho-
`tomimesis, which raises the possibility that
`psilocybin-induced psychotomimesis is a second-
`ary response to increased dopaminergic transmis-
`sion, as demonstrated recently in a double-blind
`placebo-controlled PET study in humans (n = 7,
`0.25 mg/kg p.o.) using the D2-receptor ligand
`[11C] raclopride.42 Functional interactions of
`central dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems
`have been well demonstrated.43,44
`In experiments with rats, Aghajanian 45 showed
`psilocybin to interact mainly with serotonin
`receptors of the dorsal raphe nucleus. Because of
`its inhibiting influence on neurones of the dorsal
`raphe nucleus an activation of noradrenergic
`neurones of the nearby
`locus coeruleus
`is
`induced. The locus coeruleus represents a major
`center for the integration of sensory input. This
`may explain some forms of perceptual alterations
`such as synaesthesias. Another hypothesis gen-
`erated in the course of recent human studies with
`psilocybin assumed that alterations of different
`feedback-loops between cortex and thalamus are
`
`Table 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters of psilocin, the active metabolite (N = 8, 0.224 mg/kg psilocybin p.o.)6
`
`Cmax[ng/ml plasma]
`
`tmax[min]
`
`AUCo-` [ng min/ml]
`
`t1/2
`
`Fabs[%]
`
`Mean(SD)
`
`8.2 (2.8)
`
`105 (37)
`
`1963 (659)
`
`163.3 (63.5)
`
`52.7 (20.4)
`
`

`

`responsible for an “opening of the thalamic filter
`for sensory input” as the cause of the psilocybin
`induced frontal hyperfrontality, as shown in PET
`studies.7
`The evidence reviewed suggests psilocybin to
`exhibit low toxicity and may be seen as physio-
`logically well tolerated. However, most studies
`are old and do not meet contemporary standards
`for safety studies. In particular, properly con-
`ducted safety pharmacology studies are lacking.
`Complications may result mainly from its psy-
`chotomimetic effects in vulnerable individuals,
`especially under uncontrolled conditions.
`
`Acknowledgements
`We should like to thank Felix Hasler, PhD, for
`permitting the use of some of the figures in the
`text.
`
`References
`1. Stamets P. Psilocybin mushrooms of the world.
`Olympia, WA: Ten Speed Press, 1996.
`2. Pollock SH. The psilocybin mushroom pandemic. J
`Psychedelic Drugs 1975;7:73–84.
`3. Pierrot M, Josse P, Raspiller MF et al. Intoxications
`par champignons hallucinogenes. Ann Med Interne
`(Paris) 2000; 151 (suppl.):BB16–19.
`4. Delgado PL, Moreno FA. Hallucinogens, ser-
`otonin, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Psy-
`choactive Drugs 1998;30:359 –66.
`5. Holzmann PP. Bestimmung von Psilocybin-Metab-
`oliten im Humanplasma und -urin. T Èubingen: PhD
`Dissertation University of T Èubingen (Germany),
`1995.
`6. Hasler F. Untersuchungen zur Humanpharmako-
`kinetik von Psilocybin. Berne: PhD Dissertation
`University of Berne (Switzerland), 1997.
`7. Vollenweider FX, Leenders KL, Scharfetter C et al.
`Positron emission tomography and [F-18] fluor-
`odeoxyglucose studies of metabolic hyperfrontality
`and psychopathology in the psilocybin model of
`psychosis. Neuropsychopharmacology 1997;16:
`357–72.
`8. Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E, Schreckenberger M et al.
`Neurometabolic effects of psilocybin, 3,4-methyl-
`(MDE)
`enedioxyethylamphetamine
`and
`d-methamphetamine in healthy volunteers. Neuro-
`psychopharmacology 1999;20:565 –81.
`9. Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E, Thelen B, Habermeyer E et
`al. Psychopathological, neuroendocrine and auto-
`nomic effects of 3,4-methylenedioxyethylampheta-
`mine (MDE), psilocybin and d-methamphetamine
`in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 1999;
`142:41–50.
`10. Vollenweider FX. Advances and pathophysiological
`models of hallucinogenic drug actions in humans: a
`preamble for schizophrenia research. Pharmaco-
`psychiatry 1998;31 (suppl.):92–103.
`
`Pharmacology of psilocybin
`
`363
`
`11. Hofmann A, Heim R, Brack A et al. Psilocybin und
`Psilocin, zwei psychotrope Wirkstoffe aus mex-
`ikanischen Zauberpilzen. Helv Chim Acta
`1959;XLII:1557–72.
`12. Leuner H. Die experimentelle Psychose. Berlin,
`G Èottingen, Heidelberg: Springer, 1962.
`13. Leuner H. Halluzinogene. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien:
`Huber, 1981.
`14. Passie T. Psilocybin in der modernen Psychother-
`apie. Curare 1995;18:131–52.
`15. Cerletti A. Etude pharmacologique de la psilocy-
`bine. In: Heim R, Wasson RG, editors. Les
`champignons hallucinogenes du mexique. Paris:
`Museum de historie naturelle; 1958, pp. 268–71.
`16. Cerletti, A. Pharmacology of psilocybine. In: Brad-
`ley P, Deniker P, Radouco-Thomas C, editors.
`Neuro-psychopharmacology. Amsterdam: Elsevier;
`1959, pp. 291–4.
`17. Hofmann A, Heim R, Brack A et al. Psilocybin und
`Psilocin, zwei psychotrope Wirkstoffe aus mex-
`ikanischen Zauberpilzen. Helv Chim Acta
`1959;XLII:1557–72.
`18. Monnier M. Action de la psilocybine au cerveau du
`lapin. Experientia 1959;15:321–3.
`19. Horibe M. The effects of psilocybin on EEG and
`behavior
`in monkeys. Act Nerv
`Sup
`1974;16:40–2.
`20. Da Fonseca JS, Cardoso C, Salgueiro E, Fialho
`ML. Neurophysiological and psychological study
`of psilocybin-induced modification of visual infor-
`mation processing in man. In: Bente D, Bradley
`PB, editors. Neuro-psychopharmacology, vol. 4.
`Amsterdam, London, New York: Elsevier; 1965,
`pp. 315–19.
`21. Rynearson RR, Wilson MR, Bickford RG. Psilocy-
`bin-induced changes in psychologic function, elec-
`troencephalogram, and light-evoked potentials in
`human subjects. Mayo Clin Proc 1968;43:
`191– 204.
`22. Quetin AM. La Psilocybine en psychiatrie clinique
`et experimentale. Paris: Medical Dissertation Uni-
`versity of Paris, 1960.
`23. Hidalgo W. Estudio comparativo psicofisiologico de
`la mescalina, dietilamida del acido D-lysergico y
`psilocibina. Acta Med Venezolana 1960;8:56–62.
`24. Delay J, Pichot P, Lemperiere T, Nicolas-Charles
`PJ. Etude psycho-physiologique et clinique de la
`psilocybine. In: Heim R, Wasson RG, editors. Les
`champignons hallucinogenes du mexique. Paris:
`Museum de historie naturelle; 1958, pp.
`287–310.
`25. Hollister LE. Clinical, biochemical and psycho-
`logic effects of psilocybin. Arch Int Pharmacodyn
`Ther 1961;130:42–52.
`26. Van Went GF. Mutagenicity testing of 3 hallucino-
`gens: LSD, psilocybin and delta 9-THC, using the
`micronucleus test. Experientia 1978;34:324–5.
`27. Brown FC. Hallucinogenic drugs. Springfield, IL:
`CC Thomas; 1972.
`28. Hopf A, Eckert H. Distribution patterns of
`14C-psilocin in the brains of various animals. Act
`Nerv Sup 1974;16:64–6.
`29. Hasler F, Bourquin D, Brenneisen R, BÈar T,
`Vollenweider FX. Determination of psilocybin and
`
`

`

`364
`
`T. Passie et al.
`
`4-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid in plasma by HPLC-
`ECD and pharmacokinetic profiles of oral and
`intravenous psilocybin in man. Pharm Acta Helv
`1997;72:175 –84.
`30. Horita A. Some biochemical studies on psilocybin
`and psilocin. J Neuropsychiatry 1963;4:270–3.
`31. Eindvindvik K, Rasmussen KE. Handling of psilo-
`cybin and psilocin by everted sacs of rat jejunum
`and colon. Acta Pharm Nord 1989;1:295–302.
`32. Laatsch H. Zur Pharmakologie von Psilocybin und
`Psilocin. In: Liggenstorfer R, RÈatsch C, editors.
`Maria Sabina-Botin der heiligen Pilze. Solothurn,
`L Èohrbach: Nachtschatten; 1996, pp. 193– 202.
`33. Isbell H. Comparison of the reactions induced by
`psilocybin and LSD-25 in man. Psychopharmaco-
`logia 1959;1:29–38.
`34. Wolbach AB, Miner EJ, Isbell H. Comparison of
`psilocin with psilocybin, mescaline and LSD-25.
`Psychopharmacologia 1962;3:219–23.
`35. Abramson HA, Jarvik ME, Gorin MH, Hirsch
`MW. Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD 25): XVII.
`Tolerance development and its relationship to a
`theory of psychosis. J Psychol 1956;41:81–6.
`36. Balestrieri, C. On the action mechanisms of LSD
`25. In: Abramson HA, editor. The use of LSD in
`psychotherapy and alcoholism. Indianapolis, New
`York, Kansas City: Bobbs Merrill; 1967, pp.
`653–60.
`37. Isbell H, Wolbach AB, Wikler A, Miner EJ. Cross
`tolerance between LSD and psilocybin. Psycho-
`pharmacologia 1961;2:147–59.
`38. Abramson HA, Rolo A. Lysergic acid diethylamide
`(LSD-25): XXXVIII. Comparison with actions of
`
`methysergide and psilocybin on test subjects. J
`Asthma Res 1965;3:81–96.
`39. McKenna DJ, Repke DB, Peroutka SJ. Differential
`interactions of indolealkylamines with 5-hydroxy-
`tryptamines receptor subtypes. Neuropsychophar-
`macology 1990;29:193 –8.
`40. Creese I, Burt DR, Snyder SH. The dopamine
`receptor: differential bindingof d-LSD and related
`agents to agonist and antagonist states. Life Sci
`1975;17:15–20.
`41. Vollenweider FX, Vollenweider-Scherpenhuysen
`MFI, BÈabler A, Vogel H, Hell D. Psilocybin induces
`schizophrenia-like psychosis in humans via ser-
`otonin-2 agonist action. Neuroreport 1998;9:
`3897–902.
`42. Vollenweider FX, Vontobel P, Hell D, Leenders
`KL. 5-HAT modulation of dopamine release in
`basal ganglia in psilocybin-induced psychosis in
`man—a PET study with [11C]raclopride. Neuro-
`psychopharmacology 1999;20:424 –33.
`43. Joyce JN. The dopamine hypothesis of schizo-
`phrenia: limbic interactions with serotonin and
`norepinephrine. Psychopharmacology 1993;112:
`S16–34.
`44. Kapur S, Remington G. Serotonin-dopamine inter-
`action and its relevance to schizophrenia. Am J
`Psychiatry 1996;153:466 –76.
`45. Aghajanian GK. LSD and phenethylamine hallu-
`cinogens: common sites of neuronal action. In:
`Pletscher A, Ladewig D, editors. 50 years of
`LSD. Current status and perspectives of halluci-
`nogens. New York, London: Parthenon; 1994,
`pp. 27–42.
`
`

`

`Copyright© 2002 EBSCO Publishing
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket