throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
` Paper No. 19
` Entered: May 26, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CIZION, LLC,
`d/b/a VULCAN INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`KERR MACHINE CO.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`PGR2020-00065
`Patent 10,591,070 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before HYUN J. JUNG, JAMES J. MAYBERRY, and RYAN H. FLAX,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MAYBERRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial
`35 U.S.C. § 327; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2020-00065
`Patent 10,591,070 B2
`
`
`Pursuant to our authorization, the parties filed a Joint Motion to
`Terminate Proceeding (Paper 15) and a Joint Request to Keep Settlement
`Agreement Confidential and Separate Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (Paper
`16), seeking to terminate PGR2020-00065. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(b), the parties also filed a true copy of their written agreement
`(Ex. 1075) in the proceeding. Ex. 1075 is entitled “Confidential Settlement
`Communication” and contemplates the parties executing “a more detailed
`settlement agreement.” Ex. 1075, 2. PGR2020-00065 concerns U.S. Patent
`No. 10,591,070 B2 (the “’070 patent”). Ex. 1001.
`In response to further instructions from the Board, the parties filed an
`Amended Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding (Paper 17) and an
`Amended Joint Request to Keep Settlement Agreement Confidential and
`Separate Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (Paper 18). With that filing, the parties
`filed a confidential, finalized Settlement Agreement (Ex. 1076).
`In the Amended Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding, the parties
`indicate that they have reached a confidential settlement of their dispute with
`respect to the ’070 patent. Paper 17, 2. The parties further indicate this
`settlement includes the present proceeding and the underlying district court
`litigation. Id.
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 327(a), “a post-grant review instituted under this
`chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`request of the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the
`merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” The
`parties indicate that the Board has not already decided the merits in the
`present proceeding, making termination appropriate under 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.72. Paper 17, 3. The parties also indicate that the underlying district
`court litigation involving the ‘070 patent has already been dismissed. Id.
`
`2
`
`

`

`PGR2020-00065
`Patent 10,591,070 B2
`
`
`(citing Kerr Machine Co. v. Vulcan Industrial Holdings, LLC, C.A. No. 6-
`20-cv-00200, Dkt. 80 (W.D. Tex. May 10, 2021)).
`In view of the circumstances presented in this case, we agree that
`terminating this proceeding is proper at this time. Indeed, there are strong
`public policy reasons to favor settlement between the parties to a
`proceeding. See Consolidated Trial Practice Guide (“Consolidated Practice
`Guide”)1 at 86; see also 84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019). When, as
`here, we have not rendered a Final Written Decision on the merits, we
`generally expect that the proceeding will terminate after the filing of a
`settlement agreement. See id.
`Based on the preceding, we determine that it is appropriate to
`terminate this proceeding without rendering a Final Written Decision as to
`the patentability of the challenged claims of the ’070 patent.
`The parties also “jointly request that the Board treat the [p]arties’
`confidential Settlement Agreements [Exhibits 1075 and 1076] as business
`confidential information, and keep that Agreements separate from the files
`of the involved patent (No. 10,591,070) and this [post-grant review]
`proceeding.” Paper 18, 2. The parties state that Exhibits 1075 and 1076
`represent “[a] true and correct copy of the Settlement Agreements between
`the [p]arties.” Id.
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the parties’ request that the settlement agreements
`(Ex. 1075 and Ex. 1076) be treated as business confidential information and
`
`
`1 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`3
`
`

`

`PGR2020-00065
`Patent 10,591,070 B2
`
`
`kept separate from the file of U.S. Patent No. 10,591,070 B2, under the
`provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that previously filed motion and request
`regarding Exhibit 1075 alone are moot and expunged (Papers 15, 16); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Joint Motion to Terminate
`Proceeding is granted, and this proceeding is hereby terminated.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`PGR2020-00065
`Patent 10,591,070 B2
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Brenton Babcock
`Barry Herman
`WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP
`Brent.Babcock@wbd-us.com
`Barry.Herman@wbd-us.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`James Hall
`Stephen Zinda
`J. David Cabello
`CABELLO HALL ZINDA, PLLC
`james@chzfirm.com
`stephen@chzfirm.com
`david@chzfirm.com
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket