throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HUNTING TITAN, INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DYNAENERGETICS EUROPE GMBH
`
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case: PGR2020-00080
`Patent No. 10,472,938
`
`____________
`
`DECLARATION OF THILO SCHARF
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 1 of 16
`
`

`

`
`
`I, Thilo Scharf, being over the age of 18 and competent to make the
`
`declarations herein, do hereby declare that:
`
`1.
`
`I am the Product Line Director of Systems at DynaEnergetics Europe
`
`GmbH (“DynaEnergetics”), and I have held this role since 2017. I joined
`
`DynaEnergetics as a Customer Support Manager in 2011 before becoming a
`
`Product Line Manager in 2014. In my roles as Product Line Manager and now as
`
`Product Line Director, I have overseen the development of new products for
`
`DynaEnergetics, including the DynaStage® system, all the way from conception of
`
`the product to designing the product and ultimately launching the product into the
`
`marketplace. I also meet with DynaEnergetics’ customers and industry groups in
`
`the United States.
`
`2.
`
`DynaEnergetics introduced their DynaStage® perforation gun system
`
`during the Offshore Technology Conference (OTC) in May 2014.
`
`3.
`
`The DynaStage® system (shown below, as introduced in 2014) is
`
`DynaEnergetics’ fully Plug and Go™ perforating system. The DynaStage® system
`
`is designed to greatly reduce the industry’s most common failure points and
`
`elevate users’ safety while simplifying and streamlining operations. For example,
`
`the DynaStage® system reduces gun assembly and disassembly times,
`
`maintenance, and risk of misfire.
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 2 of 16
`
`

`

`
`
`Ex. 2009 at 1.
`
`4.
`
`The DynaStage® system was a top-down redesign of conventional
`
`perforation guns and associated wellbore perforating operations.
`
`5.
`
`Conventional perforation guns required meticulous, manual assembly
`
`of perforation gun components and wiring of electrical and ballistic connections
`
`necessary for relaying signals to and through the gun. Assembling the components
`
`included, among other things, positioning a highly-engineered and machined metal
`
`charge tube containing explosive shaped charges within a gun carrier, and wiring
`
`the electrical and making the ballistic connections used to relay electrical
`
`detonation signals and detonate the shaped charges. Assembly and/or wiring was
`
`performed on-site, due to, for example, transportation regulations prohibiting
`
`transporting products in a manner that might result in accidental detonation of
`
`explosive components.
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 3 of 16
`
`

`

`6.
`
`For example, the excerpts below, from Petitioner’s own Gun Loading
`
`Manual (Ex. 2004) and User Manual (Ex. 2005), illustrate and describe, in
`
`Petitioner’s own words, just one portion of the complicated assembly and wiring
`
`configurations and procedures that conventional perforating systems required when
`
`DynaEnergetics launched the DynaStage® system, and still require.
`
`Ex. 2004 at 14.
`
`Ex. 2005 at 40, 43.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 4 of 16
`
`

`

`7.
`
`As shown in the images above, when assembling the perforation gun
`
`string, wiring had to be manually manipulated and connected to other wires via a
`
`small port in the top of the tandem sub. Such subs were reusable components since
`
`they isolated adjacent guns and were not destroyed by explosions of the guns. This
`
`port in the sub was also used to manually wire (i.e., by hand) all of the
`
`connections, including connecting a “signal” line wire to a selective perforation
`
`switch and/or to a detonator.
`
`8.
`
`In a conventional perforation gun, it is not uncommon for ground
`
`wires to be manually wedged on or in between threaded pieces, wrapped around an
`
`end of an outer gun carrier, or wrapped around an existing screw or retainer nut.
`
`Without a reliable ground wire connection design, the electrical connection might
`
`become damaged, unstable/ intermittent or fail outright upon assembly and / or
`
`conveying/ running of the perforation gun. In addition, when a wired detonator is
`
`used it must be manually connected to the ground wire and upon connecting
`
`perforation gun components by, e.g., threaded connections that require relative
`
`rotation between the components, the ground wire may become twisted, crimped,
`
`pierced, ripped away from electrical components, etc.
`
`9.
`
`The above “Installing the ControlFire® switch into tandem subs”
`
`portion of Petitioner’s User Manual (Ex. 2005 at 43) is typical of the complex
`
`wiring instructions for conventional wired perforating gun systems, and that is just
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 5 of 16
`
`

`

`for the tandem sub connections between guns. An actual gun/tool string that is
`
`deployed in the wellbore may further include a number of different components—
`
`such as a top connector to a wireline, a bottom connector/tool for terminating the
`
`gun/tool string, other wellbore tools such as plugs, etc.—and each component
`
`typically requires its own procedures. Ex. 2005 at, e.g., 43 (“Installing the
`
`ControlFire® switch into a bottom gun (no plug),” “Installing the ControlFire®
`
`switch into a bottom gun (with plug): FOR PLUG-SHOOT APPLICATIONS,
`
`THERE WILL BE TWO ControlFire® SWITCHES BELOW THE BOTTOM
`
`GUN: ONE FOR THE BOTTOM GUN AND ONE FOR THE IGNITER TO THE
`
`SETTING TOOL.”), 44 (“Connecting a bottom gun to a plug-shoot adapter”). The
`
`above Figures 47 and 48 from Petitioner’s User Manual (Ex. 2005 at 43), and
`
`model assembly from Petitioner’s Loading Manual (Ex. 2004 at 14) illustrate the
`
`confusing array of wires that a user would see and need to coordinate with the
`
`wiring instructions during the wiring procedures.
`
`10.
`
`In addition, the above excerpts are directed to wiring procedures for
`
`electrical feedthrough connections and do not include the additional wiring
`
`procedures required to arm the gun to actually detonate. Ex. 2004 at, e.g., 45-48.
`
`11. The collection of free wires, component parts, and complicated wiring
`
`instructions shown above and, generally, in Petitioner’s own user documents, e.g.,
`
`Ex. 2004, 2005, contribute significantly to component failure and human error that
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 6 of 16
`
`

`

`can render guns inoperable and potentially dangerous either within or outside of
`
`the well and the time and (specialized) labor-intensive processes that delay
`
`wellbore operations and drive costs up for operators and service companies.
`
`12. The above Figure 40 from Petitioner’s User Manual (Ex. 2005 at 40)
`
`also illustrates the fixed shaped charge phasing aspect that limits conventional
`
`perforating gun systems with conventional, machined metal charge tubes.
`
`13. The DynaStage® system was, when launched, and is still, today,
`
`unrivaled in performance and technological advances and has proved to be the
`
`safest and most reliable, versatile, and highly valued perforating gun system in the
`
`industry. In fact, the DynaStage® system ushered in the era of “pre-wired” and
`
`factory assembled perforation guns that do not require cumbersome on-site
`
`assembly of internal components or wiring of electrical and/or ballistic
`
`connections.
`
`14.
`
`Indeed, the DynaStage® perforation gun system is assembled in
`
`DynaEnergetics’ facility in Blum, TX, ballistically connected, tested for electrical
`
`and mechanical connectivity, shipped to the wellbore site and as a last stage, a
`
`wireless detonator is inserted into each gun. By assembling perforation guns in
`
`this way, wellbore site operators have experienced far fewer on-site safety and
`
`quality incidents (and near misses), and reliability in perforating has increased.
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 7 of 16
`
`

`

`15. Dozens of pre-wired guns inspired by the DynaStage® system have
`
`now entered the market—the DynaStage® system has singularly changed the
`
`industry and raised performance standards, setting a new, higher benchmark
`
`against which all perforating systems in the market, including look-alike systems
`
`and pre-wired guns, are measured.
`
`16. The heart of the DynaStage® system is, as shown below, a stackable
`
`assembly of injection-molded shaped charge holders and connectors for ballistic
`
`and electrical connections, and DynaEnergetics’ flagship wireless “push-in” Plug
`
`and Go™ detonator, shown in the below image of the current commercial
`
`embodiment, and in the configuration shown in FIG. 30 of the ’938 Patent.
`
`Ex. 2006 at 7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 8 of 16
`
`

`

`Plug and Go™ Detonator
`
`
`
`
`
`17. The injection-molded components are custom-formed to make all
`
`necessary electrical and ballistic connections by contact (i.e., without manual
`
`wiring) in an entirely self-contained, modular assembly completed, loaded, and
`
`locked into a gun carrier, and quality tested in the factory. After arrival at the
`
`wellbore site, the wireless detonator need only be inserted into the top connector of
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 9 of 16
`
`

`

`the perforating assembly to complete the electrical connections and ballistic
`
`couplings.
`
`18. A top connector includes directional locking fins to lock the assembly
`
`safely within the gun carrier during their trip to the wellbore site.
`
`
`
`19. Upon arrival at the wellbore site, the modular assemblies are armed
`
`and electrical feedthrough connections are completed by simply inserting the Plug
`
`and Go™ detonator into an end of a connector, as shown above.
`
`20. The Plug and Go™ detonator is reminiscent in size and shape to a meat
`
`thermometer, and inserting it into the connector is simpler than inserting a battery
`
`into a flashlight.
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 10 of 16
`
`

`

`
`
`21. The detonator includes all of the electrical connections, safety and
`
`switch circuitry, explosive components and controls necessary for relaying
`
`electrical signals along a gun string and selectively detonating the shaped charges
`
`after receiving its unique series of digital detonation codes. All of the electrical
`
`connections and ballistic alignments are automatically made when the detonator is
`
`inserted into the top connector.
`
`22. As shown below in Figure 32 from the ’938 Patent and a blown-up
`
`excerpt thereof, the bulkhead (orange) is positioned within a tandem seal adapter
`
`(TSA) (pink). The term “bulkhead” is a common and accepted industry term and
`
`is generally understood to include a device that pressure isolates adjacent guns and
`
`passes an electrical signal between the adjacent guns. The term “tandem seal
`
`adapter” is not a common or accepted industry term. DynaEnergetics coined that
`
`term to describe a component, i.e., the TSA shown below, that creates a seal
`
`between two gun housings and provides a channel to receive or accommodate the
`
`bulkhead. The bulkhead seals adjacent guns when positioned within the TSA. In
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 11 of 16
`
`

`

`addition to sealing the guns, the bulkhead has an electrical pin contact assembly
`
`(brownish orange) passing through the middle of it to electrically connect adjacent
`
`guns.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 12 of 16
`
`

`

`23. The development work behind these DynaStage® system innovations
`
`was extensive and required a rethinking of the most fundamental principles of
`
`perforating products. Such innovative features of the DynaStage® system
`
`described and claimed in the ʼ938 Patent include: developing a wireless detonator
`
`having three separate and distinct wireless connectors, and developing a wireless
`
`ground contact connector capable of maintaining a reliable contact with a TSA
`
`without becoming compromised, or otherwise interfering with a pin contact
`
`extending from a bulkhead within the TSA to a wireless signal-in connector on the
`
`detonator adjacent to the TSA.
`
`24. Since its introduction to the market in 2014, the DynaStage® system
`
`has been very successful and displaced sales of traditional gun systems at a high
`
`rate. For example, a report published by third-party Stifel Financial Corp. on
`
`stocks in the oilfield services and equipment sector indicates that sales of the
`
`DynaStage® system increased from only 2,500 units in the first quarter of 2017 to
`
`over 80,000 units in the first quarter of 2018. Ex. 2007 at 53. This is generally
`
`consistent with my understanding and DynaEnergetics’ internal records.
`
`25. DynaEnergetics’ customers were initially skeptical about the
`
`DynaStage® system and whether its benefits justified the increased price over
`
`conventional systems. However, after field trials demonstrated its enormous
`
`benefits, customers began to demand the DynaStage® system.
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 13 of 16
`
`

`

`26. DynaEnergetics’ market share has increased as a result of the
`
`DynaStage® system’s success and adoption in the industry. A report published by
`
`third-party industry experts Spears and Associates shows that, by the end of the
`
`third quarter in 2019, DynaEnergetics had roughly 24% share of the perforating
`
`market, nearly doubling its market share since 2017. Ex. 2010 at 104. I note that
`
`the report shows Hunting Titan’s increase in market share following the
`
`introduction of its H-1™ Perforating Gun System, Hunting Titan’s answer to the
`
`DynaStage® system, in 2015. Id. The previous leader in the segment (Corelab
`
`Owen) lost market share year over year by not offering a comparable system. Id.
`
`27.
`
`In response to this success, DynaEnergetics recently completed
`
`construction of a new 74,000-square-foot state of the art facility in Blum, Texas
`
`focused on production of the DynaStage® system. The new facility has six new
`
`assembly lines for the DynaStage® system, which has significantly expanded
`
`DynaEnergetics’ capacity to meet customer demand for the DynaStage® system
`
`and allowed for DynaEnergetics’ continued growth. Ex. 2007 at 53; Ex. 2011.
`
`28.
`
`In addition to its commercial success, the DynaStage® system has
`
`garnered significant praise from the industry for its improved safety and ability to
`
`significantly reduce the risk of misruns, misfires, and human error and its 99.99%
`
`operating efficiency. Ex. 2007 at 2, 6; Ex. 2012. Our customers have also touted
`
`the benefit of the Plug and Go™ nature of the DynaStage® system because it
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 14 of 16
`
`

`

`“[d]oes not require any initiator or switch wiring or crimping at the wellsite.” Ex.
`
`2013 at 5.
`
`29.
`
` Based on my knowledge and experience, I believe that the success of
`
`and praise for the DynaStage® system can be directly attributed to several features
`
`described in the ’938 Patent, including but not limited to the features described in
`
`detail above.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 15 of 16
`
`

`

`I hereby declare that all statements of my knowledge made in this declaration are
`
`true and that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under
`
`Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Dated:
`
`b‘MW'
`
`-
`
`‘1
`
`will
`
`Thilo Scharf
`
`DynaEnergetits Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`
`Page 16 of 16
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket