`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`HUNTING TITAN, INC.
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`DYNAENERGETICS EUROPE GMBH
`
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case: PGR2020-00080
`Patent No. 10,472,938
`
`____________
`
`DECLARATION OF THILO SCHARF
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 1 of 16
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Thilo Scharf, being over the age of 18 and competent to make the
`
`declarations herein, do hereby declare that:
`
`1.
`
`I am the Product Line Director of Systems at DynaEnergetics Europe
`
`GmbH (“DynaEnergetics”), and I have held this role since 2017. I joined
`
`DynaEnergetics as a Customer Support Manager in 2011 before becoming a
`
`Product Line Manager in 2014. In my roles as Product Line Manager and now as
`
`Product Line Director, I have overseen the development of new products for
`
`DynaEnergetics, including the DynaStage® system, all the way from conception of
`
`the product to designing the product and ultimately launching the product into the
`
`marketplace. I also meet with DynaEnergetics’ customers and industry groups in
`
`the United States.
`
`2.
`
`DynaEnergetics introduced their DynaStage® perforation gun system
`
`during the Offshore Technology Conference (OTC) in May 2014.
`
`3.
`
`The DynaStage® system (shown below, as introduced in 2014) is
`
`DynaEnergetics’ fully Plug and Go™ perforating system. The DynaStage® system
`
`is designed to greatly reduce the industry’s most common failure points and
`
`elevate users’ safety while simplifying and streamlining operations. For example,
`
`the DynaStage® system reduces gun assembly and disassembly times,
`
`maintenance, and risk of misfire.
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 2 of 16
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 2009 at 1.
`
`4.
`
`The DynaStage® system was a top-down redesign of conventional
`
`perforation guns and associated wellbore perforating operations.
`
`5.
`
`Conventional perforation guns required meticulous, manual assembly
`
`of perforation gun components and wiring of electrical and ballistic connections
`
`necessary for relaying signals to and through the gun. Assembling the components
`
`included, among other things, positioning a highly-engineered and machined metal
`
`charge tube containing explosive shaped charges within a gun carrier, and wiring
`
`the electrical and making the ballistic connections used to relay electrical
`
`detonation signals and detonate the shaped charges. Assembly and/or wiring was
`
`performed on-site, due to, for example, transportation regulations prohibiting
`
`transporting products in a manner that might result in accidental detonation of
`
`explosive components.
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 3 of 16
`
`
`
`6.
`
`For example, the excerpts below, from Petitioner’s own Gun Loading
`
`Manual (Ex. 2004) and User Manual (Ex. 2005), illustrate and describe, in
`
`Petitioner’s own words, just one portion of the complicated assembly and wiring
`
`configurations and procedures that conventional perforating systems required when
`
`DynaEnergetics launched the DynaStage® system, and still require.
`
`Ex. 2004 at 14.
`
`Ex. 2005 at 40, 43.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 4 of 16
`
`
`
`7.
`
`As shown in the images above, when assembling the perforation gun
`
`string, wiring had to be manually manipulated and connected to other wires via a
`
`small port in the top of the tandem sub. Such subs were reusable components since
`
`they isolated adjacent guns and were not destroyed by explosions of the guns. This
`
`port in the sub was also used to manually wire (i.e., by hand) all of the
`
`connections, including connecting a “signal” line wire to a selective perforation
`
`switch and/or to a detonator.
`
`8.
`
`In a conventional perforation gun, it is not uncommon for ground
`
`wires to be manually wedged on or in between threaded pieces, wrapped around an
`
`end of an outer gun carrier, or wrapped around an existing screw or retainer nut.
`
`Without a reliable ground wire connection design, the electrical connection might
`
`become damaged, unstable/ intermittent or fail outright upon assembly and / or
`
`conveying/ running of the perforation gun. In addition, when a wired detonator is
`
`used it must be manually connected to the ground wire and upon connecting
`
`perforation gun components by, e.g., threaded connections that require relative
`
`rotation between the components, the ground wire may become twisted, crimped,
`
`pierced, ripped away from electrical components, etc.
`
`9.
`
`The above “Installing the ControlFire® switch into tandem subs”
`
`portion of Petitioner’s User Manual (Ex. 2005 at 43) is typical of the complex
`
`wiring instructions for conventional wired perforating gun systems, and that is just
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 5 of 16
`
`
`
`for the tandem sub connections between guns. An actual gun/tool string that is
`
`deployed in the wellbore may further include a number of different components—
`
`such as a top connector to a wireline, a bottom connector/tool for terminating the
`
`gun/tool string, other wellbore tools such as plugs, etc.—and each component
`
`typically requires its own procedures. Ex. 2005 at, e.g., 43 (“Installing the
`
`ControlFire® switch into a bottom gun (no plug),” “Installing the ControlFire®
`
`switch into a bottom gun (with plug): FOR PLUG-SHOOT APPLICATIONS,
`
`THERE WILL BE TWO ControlFire® SWITCHES BELOW THE BOTTOM
`
`GUN: ONE FOR THE BOTTOM GUN AND ONE FOR THE IGNITER TO THE
`
`SETTING TOOL.”), 44 (“Connecting a bottom gun to a plug-shoot adapter”). The
`
`above Figures 47 and 48 from Petitioner’s User Manual (Ex. 2005 at 43), and
`
`model assembly from Petitioner’s Loading Manual (Ex. 2004 at 14) illustrate the
`
`confusing array of wires that a user would see and need to coordinate with the
`
`wiring instructions during the wiring procedures.
`
`10.
`
`In addition, the above excerpts are directed to wiring procedures for
`
`electrical feedthrough connections and do not include the additional wiring
`
`procedures required to arm the gun to actually detonate. Ex. 2004 at, e.g., 45-48.
`
`11. The collection of free wires, component parts, and complicated wiring
`
`instructions shown above and, generally, in Petitioner’s own user documents, e.g.,
`
`Ex. 2004, 2005, contribute significantly to component failure and human error that
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 6 of 16
`
`
`
`can render guns inoperable and potentially dangerous either within or outside of
`
`the well and the time and (specialized) labor-intensive processes that delay
`
`wellbore operations and drive costs up for operators and service companies.
`
`12. The above Figure 40 from Petitioner’s User Manual (Ex. 2005 at 40)
`
`also illustrates the fixed shaped charge phasing aspect that limits conventional
`
`perforating gun systems with conventional, machined metal charge tubes.
`
`13. The DynaStage® system was, when launched, and is still, today,
`
`unrivaled in performance and technological advances and has proved to be the
`
`safest and most reliable, versatile, and highly valued perforating gun system in the
`
`industry. In fact, the DynaStage® system ushered in the era of “pre-wired” and
`
`factory assembled perforation guns that do not require cumbersome on-site
`
`assembly of internal components or wiring of electrical and/or ballistic
`
`connections.
`
`14.
`
`Indeed, the DynaStage® perforation gun system is assembled in
`
`DynaEnergetics’ facility in Blum, TX, ballistically connected, tested for electrical
`
`and mechanical connectivity, shipped to the wellbore site and as a last stage, a
`
`wireless detonator is inserted into each gun. By assembling perforation guns in
`
`this way, wellbore site operators have experienced far fewer on-site safety and
`
`quality incidents (and near misses), and reliability in perforating has increased.
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 7 of 16
`
`
`
`15. Dozens of pre-wired guns inspired by the DynaStage® system have
`
`now entered the market—the DynaStage® system has singularly changed the
`
`industry and raised performance standards, setting a new, higher benchmark
`
`against which all perforating systems in the market, including look-alike systems
`
`and pre-wired guns, are measured.
`
`16. The heart of the DynaStage® system is, as shown below, a stackable
`
`assembly of injection-molded shaped charge holders and connectors for ballistic
`
`and electrical connections, and DynaEnergetics’ flagship wireless “push-in” Plug
`
`and Go™ detonator, shown in the below image of the current commercial
`
`embodiment, and in the configuration shown in FIG. 30 of the ’938 Patent.
`
`Ex. 2006 at 7.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 8 of 16
`
`
`
`Plug and Go™ Detonator
`
`
`
`
`
`17. The injection-molded components are custom-formed to make all
`
`necessary electrical and ballistic connections by contact (i.e., without manual
`
`wiring) in an entirely self-contained, modular assembly completed, loaded, and
`
`locked into a gun carrier, and quality tested in the factory. After arrival at the
`
`wellbore site, the wireless detonator need only be inserted into the top connector of
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 9 of 16
`
`
`
`the perforating assembly to complete the electrical connections and ballistic
`
`couplings.
`
`18. A top connector includes directional locking fins to lock the assembly
`
`safely within the gun carrier during their trip to the wellbore site.
`
`
`
`19. Upon arrival at the wellbore site, the modular assemblies are armed
`
`and electrical feedthrough connections are completed by simply inserting the Plug
`
`and Go™ detonator into an end of a connector, as shown above.
`
`20. The Plug and Go™ detonator is reminiscent in size and shape to a meat
`
`thermometer, and inserting it into the connector is simpler than inserting a battery
`
`into a flashlight.
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 10 of 16
`
`
`
`
`
`21. The detonator includes all of the electrical connections, safety and
`
`switch circuitry, explosive components and controls necessary for relaying
`
`electrical signals along a gun string and selectively detonating the shaped charges
`
`after receiving its unique series of digital detonation codes. All of the electrical
`
`connections and ballistic alignments are automatically made when the detonator is
`
`inserted into the top connector.
`
`22. As shown below in Figure 32 from the ’938 Patent and a blown-up
`
`excerpt thereof, the bulkhead (orange) is positioned within a tandem seal adapter
`
`(TSA) (pink). The term “bulkhead” is a common and accepted industry term and
`
`is generally understood to include a device that pressure isolates adjacent guns and
`
`passes an electrical signal between the adjacent guns. The term “tandem seal
`
`adapter” is not a common or accepted industry term. DynaEnergetics coined that
`
`term to describe a component, i.e., the TSA shown below, that creates a seal
`
`between two gun housings and provides a channel to receive or accommodate the
`
`bulkhead. The bulkhead seals adjacent guns when positioned within the TSA. In
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 11 of 16
`
`
`
`addition to sealing the guns, the bulkhead has an electrical pin contact assembly
`
`(brownish orange) passing through the middle of it to electrically connect adjacent
`
`guns.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 12 of 16
`
`
`
`23. The development work behind these DynaStage® system innovations
`
`was extensive and required a rethinking of the most fundamental principles of
`
`perforating products. Such innovative features of the DynaStage® system
`
`described and claimed in the ʼ938 Patent include: developing a wireless detonator
`
`having three separate and distinct wireless connectors, and developing a wireless
`
`ground contact connector capable of maintaining a reliable contact with a TSA
`
`without becoming compromised, or otherwise interfering with a pin contact
`
`extending from a bulkhead within the TSA to a wireless signal-in connector on the
`
`detonator adjacent to the TSA.
`
`24. Since its introduction to the market in 2014, the DynaStage® system
`
`has been very successful and displaced sales of traditional gun systems at a high
`
`rate. For example, a report published by third-party Stifel Financial Corp. on
`
`stocks in the oilfield services and equipment sector indicates that sales of the
`
`DynaStage® system increased from only 2,500 units in the first quarter of 2017 to
`
`over 80,000 units in the first quarter of 2018. Ex. 2007 at 53. This is generally
`
`consistent with my understanding and DynaEnergetics’ internal records.
`
`25. DynaEnergetics’ customers were initially skeptical about the
`
`DynaStage® system and whether its benefits justified the increased price over
`
`conventional systems. However, after field trials demonstrated its enormous
`
`benefits, customers began to demand the DynaStage® system.
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 13 of 16
`
`
`
`26. DynaEnergetics’ market share has increased as a result of the
`
`DynaStage® system’s success and adoption in the industry. A report published by
`
`third-party industry experts Spears and Associates shows that, by the end of the
`
`third quarter in 2019, DynaEnergetics had roughly 24% share of the perforating
`
`market, nearly doubling its market share since 2017. Ex. 2010 at 104. I note that
`
`the report shows Hunting Titan’s increase in market share following the
`
`introduction of its H-1™ Perforating Gun System, Hunting Titan’s answer to the
`
`DynaStage® system, in 2015. Id. The previous leader in the segment (Corelab
`
`Owen) lost market share year over year by not offering a comparable system. Id.
`
`27.
`
`In response to this success, DynaEnergetics recently completed
`
`construction of a new 74,000-square-foot state of the art facility in Blum, Texas
`
`focused on production of the DynaStage® system. The new facility has six new
`
`assembly lines for the DynaStage® system, which has significantly expanded
`
`DynaEnergetics’ capacity to meet customer demand for the DynaStage® system
`
`and allowed for DynaEnergetics’ continued growth. Ex. 2007 at 53; Ex. 2011.
`
`28.
`
`In addition to its commercial success, the DynaStage® system has
`
`garnered significant praise from the industry for its improved safety and ability to
`
`significantly reduce the risk of misruns, misfires, and human error and its 99.99%
`
`operating efficiency. Ex. 2007 at 2, 6; Ex. 2012. Our customers have also touted
`
`the benefit of the Plug and Go™ nature of the DynaStage® system because it
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 14 of 16
`
`
`
`“[d]oes not require any initiator or switch wiring or crimping at the wellsite.” Ex.
`
`2013 at 5.
`
`29.
`
` Based on my knowledge and experience, I believe that the success of
`
`and praise for the DynaStage® system can be directly attributed to several features
`
`described in the ’938 Patent, including but not limited to the features described in
`
`detail above.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`Page 15 of 16
`
`
`
`I hereby declare that all statements of my knowledge made in this declaration are
`
`true and that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under
`
`Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`Dated:
`
`b‘MW'
`
`-
`
`‘1
`
`will
`
`Thilo Scharf
`
`DynaEnergetits Europe GmbH
`Ex. 2003
`
`Page 16 of 16
`
`