throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 10
`Date: January 11, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH
`ORGANISATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`BASF PLANT SCIENCE GMBH,
`Patent Owner.
`
`PGR2021-00004
`Patent 10,533,183 B2
`
`Before ULRIKE W. JENKS, JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI, and
`ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KOKOSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Granting Request for Adverse Judgment
`After Institution of Trial
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PGR2021-00004
`Patent 10,533,183 B2
`Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
`(“Petitioner”) filed a Petition requesting post-grant review of claims 1–9 of
`U.S. Patent No. 10,533,183 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’183 patent”). Paper 1.
`BASF Plant Science GmbH (“Patent Owner”) did not file a Preliminary
`Response. We instituted a post-grant review as to all challenged claims on
`the grounds raised in the Petition on April 22, 2021. Paper 6. Pursuant to
`the Scheduling Order, Patent Owner was to file a response to the petition
`and/or a motion to amend the patent by July 16, 2021. Paper 7, 12. Instead,
`Patent Owner filed a Notice re: Statutory Disclaimer, informing the Board
`that it was “disclaiming all claims in the patent.” Paper 9, 1 (“Notice”).
`With its Notice, Patent Owner filed a copy of the Disclaimer in Patent Under
`37 C.F.R. § 1.321(a) that was submitted to the Office on July 16, 2021.
`Ex. 2001 (“Disclaimer”).
`Pursuant to our rules, “[a]ctions construed to be a request for adverse
`judgment include . . . [c]ancellation or disclaimer of a claim such that the
`party has no remaining claim in the trial.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(2). Here,
`Patent Owner disclaimed claims 1–9 of the ’183 patent under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 253 according to the procedures set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 1.321(a). See
`Ex. 2001, 1. Accordingly, we construe Patent Owner’s Disclaimer as a
`request that the Board enter judgment against it with respect to claims 1–9,
`the only claims at issue in this trial, and we grant that request. See Unified
`Patents, LLC v. Arsus, LLC, IPR2020-00948, Paper 18 at 2 (PTAB Jan. 27,
`2021) (construing statutory disclaimer of all challenged claims as a request
`for adverse judgment), aff’d Case No. 2021-01648, 2021 WL 5315423 (Fed.
`Cir. Nov. 16, 2021).
`
`2
`
`

`

`PGR2021-00004
`Patent 10,533,183 B2
`
`ORDER
`
`It is hereby
`ORDERED that, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b), adverse judgment
`is entered against Patent Owner with respect to claims 1–9 of U.S. Patent
`No. 10,533,183 B2.
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Gary J. Gershik
`John P. White
`COOPER & DUNHAM LLP
`ggershik@cooperdunham.com
`jwhite@cooperdunham.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Sandip H. Patel
`Mark H. Izraelewicz
`MARSHALL GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP
`spatel@marshallip.com
`mizraelewicz@marshallip.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket