throbber
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
`published: 19 November 2015
`doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01015
`
`Wrinkled1 Accelerates Flowering and
`Regulates Lipid Homeostasis
`between Oil Accumulation and
`Membrane Lipid Anabolism in
`Brassica napus
`
`Qing Li, Jianhua Shao, Shaohua Tang, Qingwen Shen, Tiehu Wang, Wenling Chen and
`Yueyun Hong*
`
`National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural
`University, Wuhan, China
`
`Wrinkled1 (WRI1) belongs to the APETALA2 transcription factor family; it is unique to
`plants and is a central regulator of oil synthesis in Arabidopsis. The effects of WRI1 on
`comprehensive lipid metabolism and plant development were unknown, especially in
`crop plants. This study found that BnWRI1 in Brassica napus accelerated flowering and
`enhanced oil accumulation in both seeds and leaves without leading to a visible growth
`inhibition. BnWRI1 decreased storage carbohydrates and increased soluble sugars to
`facilitate the carbon flux to lipid anabolism. BnWRI1 is localized to the nucleus and
`directly binds to the AW-box at proximal upstream regions of genes involved in fatty
`acid (FA) synthesis and lipid assembly. The overexpression (OE) of BnWRI1 resulted
`in the up-regulation of genes involved in glycolysis, FA synthesis, lipid assembly, and
`flowering. Lipid profiling revealed increased galactolipids monogalactosyldiacylglycerol
`(MGDG), digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG), and phosphatidylcholine (PC) in the leaves
`of OE plants, whereas it exhibited a reduced level of the galactolipids DGDG and MGDG
`and increased levels of PC, phosphatidylethanolamide, and oil [triacylglycerol (TAG)] in
`the siliques of OE plants during the early seed development stage. These results suggest
`that BnWRI1 is important for homeostasis among TAG, membrane lipids and sugars,
`and thus facilitates flowering and oil accumulation in B. napus.
`
`Keywords: Wrinkled1 (WRI1), oil accumulation, flowering, lipid homeostasis, transcriptional regulation, Brassica
`napus
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Lipids not only serve as storage components of high-density energy, but they also function
`as essential components of cell membranes and regulators of various cellular processes during
`growth, development, and stress responses (Wang et al., 2006; Hong et al., 2008, 2009; Phillips
`et al., 2009; To et al., 2012). Fatty acid (FA) synthesis and lipid assembly involve multiple
`steps (Li-Beisson et al., 2010). The initial precursors of lipid biosynthesis include acetyl-CoA
`and glycerol-3-phosphate, which are initially derived from glycolysis and the Calvin–Benson
`cycle in plants (Kang and Rawsthorne, 1996; Alonso et al., 2007). The acetyl-CoA carboxylase
`(ACCase) complex is made of three subunits, namely biotin carboxyl carrier protein (BCCP),
`biotin carboxylase (BC), and carboxyltransferase (CT); this complex is encoded by separated
`
`Edited by:
`Chandrashekhar Pralhad Joshi,
`Michigan Technological University,
`USA
`Reviewed by:
`Biswapriya Biswavas Misra,
`University of Florida, USA
`Upinder S. Gill,
`The Samuel Roberts Noble
`Foundation, USA
`
`*Correspondence:
`Yueyun Hong
`hongyy@mail.hzau.edu.cn
`
`Specialty section:
`This article was submitted to
`Plant Biotechnology,
`a section of the journal
`Frontiers in Plant Science
`Received: 03 September 2015
`Accepted: 02 November 2015
`Published: 19 November 2015
`Citation:
`Li Q, Shao J, Tang S, Shen Q,
`Wang T, Chen W and Hong Y (2015)
`Wrinkled1 Accelerates Flowering
`and Regulates Lipid Homeostasis
`between Oil Accumulation
`and Membrane Lipid Anabolism
`in Brassica napus.
`Front. Plant Sci. 6:1015.
`doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01015
`
`Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
`
`1
`
`November 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 1015
`CSIRO Exhibit 1016
`
`

`

`Li et al.
`
`BnWRI1 in Flowering and Lipid Homeostasis
`
`genes in plants and catalyzes acetyl-CoA and CO2 to produce
`malonyl-CoA, the first committed step in de novo FA synthesis
`(Slabas and Fawcett, 1992; Ohlrogge and Browse, 1995; Ohlrogge
`and Jaworski, 1997; Voelker and Kinney, 2001; Sasaki and
`Nagano, 2004). Malonyl-CoA was then transferred to ACP
`protein by malonyl-CoA: ACP transferase (MAT) to initiate FA
`synthesis, and malonyl-CoA provides a two-carbon unit for acyl
`chain elongation as catalyzed by an FA synthase (FAS) complex
`(Ohlrogge and Browse, 1995). The synthesized FAs are either
`retained in the chloroplast for galactolipid synthesis or exported
`to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for membrane phospholipid
`and storage lipid [triacylglycerol (TAG)] assembly. The final
`step of TAG assembly as catalyzed by DAG acyltransferase
`(DGAT), which occurs
`in the Kennedy pathway,
`is also
`regarded as a critical reaction for oil accumulation (Slabas
`and Fawcett, 1992; Ohlrogge and Browse, 1995; Zou et al.,
`1999; Voelker and Kinney, 2001). The loss of DGAT1 resulted
`in reduced seed oil content, whereas DGAT1 overexpression
`(OE) enhanced the seed oil content in Arabidopsis (Zou et al.,
`1999; Jako et al., 2001). The OE of maize high-oil DGAT1-2
`also promoted oil accumulation in maize seeds (Zheng et al.,
`2008). Alternatively, phosphatidylcholine (PC) also provides
`an acyl chain toward DAG for TAG synthesis, as catalyzed
`by phospholipid:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (PDAT; Dahlqvist
`et al., 2000; Tarczynski and Shen, 2008; Zhang et al., 2009).
`Given the complicated networks that make up the lipid
`anabolic process,
`it would be more efficient
`to boost oil
`accumulation by enhancing multiple routes in a coordinated
`fashion including carbon partitioning, FA synthesis, and lipid
`assembly. Therefore, the identification of the key enzymes or
`master regulators involved in multiple steps simultaneously
`becomes an attractive approach for improving oil production
`(Ohlrogge and Jaworski, 1997; Ruuska et al., 2002; Cahoon et al.,
`2007; Mu et al., 2008). Transcriptomic profiling revealed that
`the genes encoding enzymes involved in FA synthesis is co-
`regulated to the rate of acyl chain synthesis, suggesting that
`transcriptional regulation plays an important role in the lipid
`biosynthesis process (Ruuska et al., 2002; Baud and Lepiniec,
`2009; Barthole et al., 2012). Recent studies have identified several
`transcription factors that are capable of governing multiple oil
`accumulation steps (Cernac and Benning, 2004; Shen et al., 2010;
`To et al., 2012). Wrinkled1 (WRI1) belongs to the APETALA2
`(AP2)-ethylene-responsive element binding protein family of
`transcription factors, and it acts as a central regulator in seed
`oil accumulation by modulating numerous genes simultaneously
`during late glycolysis and FA biosynthesis. A deficiency mutant
`of Arabidopsis WRI1 (AtWRI1) leads to wrinkled seeds with 80%
`less seed oil content in Arabidopsis (Focks and Benning, 1998;
`Cernac and Benning, 2004). The loss of AtWRI1 also leads to
`impaired seed germination and seedling establishment, whereas
`AtWRI1 OE enhances oil accumulation in Arabidopsis, which
`is accompanied by aberrant seedling development (Stone et al.,
`2001; Kwong et al., 2003; Cernac and Benning, 2004; Cernac et al.,
`2006; Baud et al., 2007). AtWRI1 binds to the AW-box consensus
`[CnTnG](n)7[CG] in the proximal promoter of target genes that
`are involved in the glycolysis and FA synthesis of Arabidopsis
`(Maeo et al., 2009; To et al., 2012).
`
`The biological significance of WRI1 has been extensively
`studied in relation to oil accumulation in Arabidopsis. The role of
`WRI1 in comprehensive lipid regulation in other plant species,
`particularly in crop plants, remains to be elucidated. A recent
`study showed that the WRI1 homolog from maize is able to
`compensate for the impaired oil accumulation and seedling
`establishment of the Atwri1 mutant in Arabidopsis (Cernac
`et al., 2006; Pouvreau et al., 2011). The OE of ZmWRI1 in
`maize increased the levels of FAs and some amino acid residues
`(Pouvreau et al., 2011), suggesting that the role of WRI1 in
`oil accumulation is highly conserved between monocot and
`dicot plants. Arabidopsis that overexpresses AtWRI1 exhibits
`undesirable agronomic traits, with retarded growth and reduced
`biomass (Lotan et al., 1998; Stone et al., 2001; Cernac and
`Benning, 2004; Wang et al., 2007; Mu et al., 2008), whereas
`ZmWRI1 OE in maize promotes oil accumulation without visible
`side effects on growth and development (Shen et al., 2010). The
`results suggest that the role of WRI1 in oil synthesis is conserved
`but distinguishable in different plant species. The WRI1 in
`different plant species may exhibit a unique role in addition to
`its effect on oil accumulation. Furthermore, most WRI1 studies
`have been focused on oil accumulation, and the effects of WRI1
`on membrane phospholipids and galactolipids have remained
`unknown. In the present study, we characterized BnWRI1
`(BnaA09g34250D) from Brassica napus (B. napus). BnWRI1 OE
`in B. napus resulted in enhanced lipid anabolism by binding
`to the cis-element CnTnG (n)7CG in the promoter regions of
`genes involved in FA synthesis and lipid assembly to up-regulate
`these target genes. BnWRI1 promotes oil accumulation and
`thylakoid membrane monogalactosyldiacylglycerol
`(MGDG),
`digalactosyldiacylglycerol
`(DGDG),
`and PC biosynthesis
`to regulate homeostasis among membrane lipids, oils, and
`carbohydrates. Therefore, BnWRI1 OE facilitates flowering,
`reproduction, and oil production without visible side effects on
`the growth of B. napus.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
`The Westar cultivar of canola (B. napus L.) was used in this
`study. Seeds were germinated in either Murashige and Skoog
`(MS) plates or soil in pots. Three-week-old seedlings were then
`transferred to pots containing soil. The plants were raised in
`a growth room under 16 h light (25◦C)/8 h dark (20◦C), a
`photosynthetic photon flux density of 200–300 mmol m−2 s−1,
`and 60% relative humidity, or natural conditions during winter-
`spring seasons in Wuhan, China. For the field growth test,
`3-week-old seedlings were transferred to the field at suitable
`spacing (33 cm × 50 cm) that were arranged in a one-way
`randomized block design with 30 plants/lines per block, and three
`replications.
`
`Gene Cloning, Vector Construction, and
`B. napus Plant Transformation
`To obtain the full-length BnWRI1 cDNA,
`total RNA was
`extracted from the leaves of 4-week-old B. napus plants, and it
`
`Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
`
`2
`
`November 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 1015
`CSIRO Exhibit 1016
`
`

`

`Li et al.
`
`BnWRI1 in Flowering and Lipid Homeostasis
`
`was subjected to reverse transcription to obtain first strand
`cDNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Trans-
`full-length BnWRI1
`Gene Biotech, Beijing, China). The
`cDNA was amplified by PCR with primers BnWRI1F 5(cid:3)-
`GGATCCATGAAGAGACCCTTAACCACT-3(cid:3) and BnWRI1R
`5(cid:3)-GAGCTCTCAGACAGAATAGTTCCAAGAA-3(cid:3), and then it
`was ligated into binary vector pBI121, which had been digested by
`SacI and BamHI. The resulting construct was transformed into
`B. napus by Agrobacterium GV3101 mediation with hypocotyls
`used as explants for regeneration. The transgenic shoots were
`first selected on kanamycin (50 μg/ml), and then the kanamycin
`resistant shoots were transferred to MS medium containing
`1-naphthaleneacetic acid for rooting. The transgenic plants were
`further confirmed by PCR with a pBI121 vector and BnWRI1
`sequence specific primers (Supplemental Table S1).
`
`Subcellular Localization
`The full-length cDNA of BnWRI1 was ligated into pCAMB-
`IA1301 vector that had been digested by the restriction enzymes
`SacI and BamHI. The construct containing BnWRI1-GFP was
`introduced into Agrobacterium GV3101 and infiltrated into
`tobacco leaves for 24 h to obtain transient protein expression
`under the control of the 35S promoter. Subcellular localization
`was visualized under a confocal
`laser scanning microscope
`(Leica, Biberach, Germany) with the exciter filter HFT488 and
`the transmitting optical filter BP505–530 to observe the green
`fluorescence. The nuclei were labeled with 4(cid:3),6-diamidine-2-
`phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) staining.
`
`RNA Extraction and Quantitative
`Real-time PCR
`Total RNA was extracted from various tissues at different stages
`using TransZol reagent (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China), and
`it was then treated with RNase-free DNaseI (NEW ENGLAND
`Biolabs, Ipswitch, MA, USA) to remove any contaminating DNA.
`The resulting RNA was used for first strand synthesis by reverse
`transcriptase with an oligo-d (T) 18 primer (TransGen Biotech,
`Beijing, China) to obtain cDNA according the manufacturer’s
`protocol. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with SYBR
`Green PCR Master Mix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China)
`on a single-color Real-time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad,
`Hercules, CA, USA). A BnActin gene was used as the standard
`control. The quantitative real-time PCR conditions were as
`follows: 95◦C for 1 min; 40 cycles of 95◦C for 30 s, 55◦C for
`30 s, 72◦C for 30 s; and 72◦C for 10 min for the final extension.
`The primers used for real-time PCR are listed in Supplemental
`Table S2.
`
`Lipid Extraction and Analyses
`Lipids were extracted from the leaves, developing siliques,
`and mature seeds. The lipids were separated on a thin layer
`chromatography (TLC) plate with developing solvent consisting
`of petroleum ether, ethyl ether, and acetic acid (80:20:1, v/v).
`The separated lipids were visualized with iodine vapor and the
`spots were scraped for measurement by GC analysis (Agilent
`7890A, Santa Clara, CA, USA) after a methyl ester reaction with
`
`methanol and toluene containing 5% H2SO4 at 80◦C for 3–4 h.
`To measure the seed oil contents, oil was extracted from the
`seeds and tested by GC analysis after the methyl ester reaction as
`detailed above. The GC running conditions were as follows: the
`injection port temperature was 180◦C, and the oven temperature
`was set at 180◦C for 2 min and was increased by 10◦C/min up to
`220◦C for 5 min. The temperature of the flame ionization detector
`was 280◦C with flow rates of 30, 300, and 25 ml/min for hydrogen,
`air, and helium, respectively.
`
`Electrophoretic Mobility-shift Assay
`The full-length cDNA of Bn WRI1 was amplified by using the
`forward primer 5(cid:3)-CCCGGGTATGAAGAGACCCTTAACCAC-
`3(cid:3) coupled with the reverse primer 5(cid:3)-GGATCCCGACAG
`AATAGTTCCAAGAA-3(cid:3), and then it was ligated to pET28a
`vectors that were digested by BamHI and SacI. This construct
`was transformed into Escherichia coli strain Rosetta (DE3), and
`the BnWRI1 protein was expressed by induction with 0.6 mM
`isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) while the strain
`was grown in Luria Bertani (LB) medium overnight at 20◦C.
`The cells were harvested and lysed by sonication in a buffer
`(300 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM imidazole, 5%
`glycerol, and 50 mM NaH2PO4). The cell lysate was centrifuged
`at 12,000 r/min for 20 min. The supernatant was incubated
`with Ni-NTA resin (Shanghai Sangon, http://www.sangon.com)
`for 3 h at 4◦C. The BnWRI1 protein was eluted from the
`resin after three washes with wash buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4,
`300 mM NaCl, and 20 mM imidazole, pH 8). Protein from
`E. coli cells containing only the pET28a vector was used as
`a negative control. The DNA sequences that were 300 and
`250 bp upstream from the start codon of KASI and GPAT9,
`respectively, were amplified from Arabidopsis with the KASI
`forward primer 5(cid:3)-GAATTCTGTTGAGTTACGAATTGGAG-
`3(cid:3), coupled with the KASI reverse primer 5(cid:3)-GAGCTCATTGAG
`AGAGGTATTGAGAG-3(cid:3), and the GPAT9 forward primer
`5(cid:3)-GAATTCACATAATATGTCCAAGATCATT-3(cid:3) coupled with
`the GPAT9 reverse primer 5(cid:3)-GAGCTCCTATTATACTTATA
`CCACAT-3(cid:3). The substitutive nucleotide (C→T, T→C, G→A)
`mutant at the AW-box [CnTnG](n)7[CG] was amplified by using
`a similar approach. The amplified DNA fragments containing
`native or mutant AW-box were incubated with purified BnWRI1
`protein in binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 250 mM
`NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1% glycerol, 1 mg/ml BSA, 1 mM DTT) for
`1 h at 4◦C. The resulting mixture was separated on native PAGE
`(6%) by electrophoresis and was visualized under UV light. The
`binding activity of BnWRI1 to the AW-box was also determined
`with biotin labeled DNA probes using a chemiluminescent
`electrophoretic mobility-shift assays (EMSA) kit (Beyotime,
`China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
`
`Measurements of Protein, Starch, and
`Soluble Sugar
`Proteins were extracted from leaves and seeds by homogenizing
`in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl,
`1 mM EDTA, and 1% (w/v) SDS, and incubating the mixture
`for 2 h at 25◦C. The homogenate was centrifuged at 16,000 g for
`
`Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
`
`3
`
`November 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 1015
`CSIRO Exhibit 1016
`
`

`

`Li et al.
`
`BnWRI1 in Flowering and Lipid Homeostasis
`
`FIGURE 1 | BnWRI1 expression pattern and overexpression (OE) of
`BnWRI1 in Brassica napus. (A) Transcript level of BnWRI1 in different
`B. napus tissues at seedling, bolting, flowering and seed developing stages.
`The expression level was quantified by real-time PCR normalized to the
`expression of BnActin. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). R, root; St, stem; L,
`leaf; Bu, flower bud; F, flower; and Si15, Si30, and Si45, siliques at 15, 30,
`and 45 days, respectively, after anthesis. (B) The construct containing
`BnWRI1 in the binary vector pBI121. (C,D) The transcript level of BnWRI1 in
`BnWRI1-OE plants according to semi-quantitative RT-PCR (C) and
`quantitative real-time PCR (D). Total RNA was extracted from the leaves of
`6-week-old plants, and the expression level was detected by using
`BnWRI1-specific primers. The expression levels were normalized to BnActin.
`OE2, OE16, and OE16 represent BnWRI1-OE lines. Values are mean ± SD
`(n = 3). ∗∗Indicates significant difference at P < 0.01 compared with the WT
`based on Student’s t-test.
`
`10 min, the supernatant was diluted 200 times and the protein
`concentration was measured by Lowry D protein assay (Bio-Rad).
`Soluble sugars were measured using phenol-sulfuric acid method
`(DuBois et al., 1956; Chow and Landhausser, 2004). In brief, leaf
`samples (1 g fresh weight) were homogenized with deionized
`water and filtered. The extract (50 μl) was mixed with 450 μl of
`sulfuric acid containing anthrone (2 mg/ml) at 95◦C, and then the
`absorbance at 625 nm was monitored by spectrometer (Infinite
`M200 PRD, Untersbergstr, Austria). For starch extraction, the
`remaining sediment was suspended in a solution containing 0.2 N
`KOH and incubated at 95◦C for 1 h, followed by the addition of
`1 N acetic acid and incubation for 15 min. After centrifugation at
`16,000 g for 5 min, the starch in the supernatant was measured by
`using a method similar to that of soluble sugars.
`
`FIGURE 2 | Accelerated flowering in BnWRI1-OE plants. (A) BnWRI1-OE
`and WT plants at the vegetative growth stage. The pictures were taken of
`plants that were grown in pots at 30 days after germination. (B) Accelerated
`flowering in BnWRI1-OE plants. The picture was taken of 145-day-old plants
`grown in the field. (C) Days to bolting based on a flowering rate of 50%
`(n = 20, r = 3). (D) The flowering rate of OE and WT plants grown under the
`same conditions. Values are mean ± SD (n = 20, r = 3). (E) Inflorescent
`branch number of BnWRI1-OE and WT. The data were collected from mature
`plants (175-day-old) grown in the field (n = 12, r = 3). (F) The fresh weights of
`aerial part from 175-day-old plants grown in the field. Values are mean ± SD
`(n = 12, r = 3). ∗,∗∗Indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01,
`respectively, compared with the WT based on Student’s t-test.
`
`Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
`
`4
`
`November 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 1015
`CSIRO Exhibit 1016
`
`

`

`Li et al.
`
`BnWRI1 in Flowering and Lipid Homeostasis
`
`FIGURE 3 | Enhanced seed oil accumulation in BnWRI1-OE plants. Total TAG content (A) and fatty acid (FA) composition (B) in the seeds of BnWRI1-OE and
`WT. Total TAG content (C) and FA composition (D) in the leaves of BnWRI1-OE and WT. Lipids were extracted from the leaves of 8-week-old plants and were
`separated by using a thin layer chromatography (TLC) plate. TAG spots were scraped and extracted for methylation and GC measurement. Values are mean ± SD
`(n = 4); ∗∗P < 0.01.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Expression Pattern and the Effect of
`BnWRI1 on Flowering in B. napus
`To investigate the temporal and spatial distribution of BnWRI1
`mRNA in B. napus, total RNA was extracted from various tissues
`at different stages and used for analysis by quantitative real-
`time PCR. During the seedling and bolting stages, the BnWRI1
`transcript level was higher in leaves and flower buds than it was
`in roots and stems (Figure 1A). During the flowering stage, the
`BnWRI1 expression was higher in flowers than in leaves and
`stems. The transcript level was rapidly up-regulated in siliques
`and was highest at 30 days after anthesis (Figure 1A).
`To explore the biological function of BnWRI1 in B. napus, full-
`length BnWRI1 cDNA was cloned by reverse transcription PCR
`by using mRNA that was extracted from leaves as a template,
`and the cDNA was ligated into binary vector pBI121. The
`resulting construct containing BnWRI1 was transformed into
`B. napus under the control of the 35S promoter (Figure 1B).
`More than 30 independent transgenic lines were obtained, and
`the BnWRI1 transcript level in transgenic plants was much
`higher than that of the wild-type (WT; Figures 1C,D). Three
`
`representative, independent BnWRI1 OE lines, OE2, OE16, and
`OE17, were selected randomly from 30 transgenic lines, and
`they were used for further characterization. These plants were
`grown under natural conditions either in the field or in pots,
`and no visual growth change was observed between OE and WT
`plants, which showed a similar leaf size, leaf number, and growth
`rate during the vegetative growth stage (Figure 2A). However,
`BnWRI1 accelerated flowering; OE plants bolted and flowered
`4 to 6 days earlier than WT plants (Figures 2B,C). At 136 days
`after germination, 60% of the OE plants were flowering, whereas
`only 23% of the WT plants were flowering (Figure 2D). The
`earlier flowering in OE plants did not cause changes in the total
`number of inflorescent branches and biomass at the mature stage
`compared with the results for the WT plants (Figures 2E,F).
`Overexpression of BnWRI1 Enhances Oil
`Accumulation in Seeds and Leaves
`without Undesirable Agronomic Traits
`To investigate the role of BnWRI1 in oil (TAG) synthesis, the oil
`content was measured in both the seeds and leaves of OE and
`WT plants. The oil content of BnWRI1-OE seeds was significantly
`higher than that of the WT, and it was increased by 31, 38,
`
`Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
`
`5
`
`November 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 1015
`CSIRO Exhibit 1016
`
`

`

`Li et al.
`
`BnWRI1 in Flowering and Lipid Homeostasis
`
`FIGURE 4 | The effect of BnWRI1 on partitioning among lipids, sugars, and proteins in B. napus. (A) Total FA contents in leaves from BnWRI1-OE and WT
`plants. (B,C) The soluble sugars, starch, total sugars, and proteins in the leaves of 2-month-old plants. (D,E) The soluble sugar, starch, total sugar, and protein
`contents in mature seeds. Values are mean ± SD (n = 3). DW, dry weight; ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.
`
`and 18% in OE2, OE16, and OE17, respectively (Figure 3A).
`FA profiling revealed that oleic acid (18:1) contributed mostly
`to oil accumulation in OE plants. Other FA species such as 16:0
`and 18:2 also increased in OE seeds (Figure 3B). The OE of
`BnWRI1 also increased the oil contents of vegetative tissues. The
`oils in the leaves were primarily composed of 16:0, 18:1, and
`18:0 FA species, which account for ∼90% of the total FA species.
`The total TAG contents of the leaves from OE2, OE16, and
`OE17 increased by 28, 67, and 63%, respectively, in comparison
`with the WT plants (Figure 3C). The enhanced TAG in the
`OE leaves resulted from the increase of 16:0, 18:0, 18:1, and
`18:2 FA species (Figure 3D). The relative increase in leaf oil
`content from BnWRI1 OE was greater than that of the seed oil
`content.
`
`The Effect of BnWRI1 on Total Lipids,
`Sugar, and Protein Accumulation
`tissues,
`green
`Carbohydrates
`are
`photosynthesized
`in
`predominantly in leaves, which are the major source tissue,
`providing precursors for lipid and protein synthesis. Carbon
`partitioning among these metabolites is a major factor that
`influences lipid accumulation. To determine whether enhanced
`oil accumulation resulted from alterations in carbon partitioning,
`the contents of the total
`lipids, soluble sugars, starch, and
`proteins were measured in the leaves of 3-month-old plants
`at the flowering stage. The total
`lipid content of OE leaves
`was significantly higher than that of WT, and it was increased
`
`by 24, 47, and 25% for OE2, OE16, and OE17, respectively
`(Figure 4A). BnWRI1-OE leaves exhibited increased soluble
`sugars with reduced starch contents compared with WT plants
`(Figures 4B,C). However, the total sugars and total protein
`content in OE leaves were not substantially different from those
`of WT plants (Figures 4B,C). In comparison with those in the
`leaves, the contents of soluble sugars, starch, total sugars, and
`proteins in mature seeds were less altered between the OE and
`WT (Figures 4D,E). The starch contents of OE2 and OE16 seeds
`were lower than that of the WT, whereas the soluble sugar, total
`sugar, and protein contents in OE seeds were not significantly
`different from that of the WT (Figures 4D,E). These results
`indicate that enhancing the lipid content by overexpressing
`BnWRI1 without reducing sugars and proteins, but enhanced
`leaf sugar moves from storage starch to soluble sugars for lipid
`accumulation.
`
`BnWRI1 Binds to the Proximal Upstream
`Regions of Genes Involved in Lipid
`Anabolism
`into the molecular mechanism of BnWRI1
`To get
`insight
`in lipid metabolism and carbon partitioning, the subcellular
`localization of BnWRI1 and its putative target genes involved
`in lipid metabolism were investigated. The full-length cDNA
`of BnWRI1 was fused with GFP at the C-terminus and then
`transiently expressed in the epidermal cells of tobacco leaves by
`Agrobacterium infiltration. Green fluorescent BnWRI1-GFP was
`
`Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
`
`6
`
`November 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 1015
`CSIRO Exhibit 1016
`
`

`

`Li et al.
`
`BnWRI1 in Flowering and Lipid Homeostasis
`
`FIGURE 5 | Nuclear localization of BnWRI1. (A) Green fluorescence of BnWRI1-GFP. (B) Nucleus stained with DAPI. (C) Bright image. (D) Merged image of the
`same cells observed in (A). BnWRI1-GFP was transiently expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana epidermal cells and visualized under by confocal laser scanning
`microscopy. The nuclear localization of BnWRI1 was indicated by green fluorescence that was overlaid with the nucleus indicated by DAPI staining.
`
`visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Figure 5A),
`and the resulting image was overlaid with a nucleus marked by
`4(cid:3),6-diamidine-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) staining,
`confirming that the introduced BnWRI1 is localized to the
`nucleus (Figures 5B–D). The proximal upstream regions of
`Arabidopsis genes such as pyruvate kinase (PKp), BCCP2,
`KASI, LPAT2, and GPAT9 that are involved in glycolysis, FA
`synthesis, and lipid assembly contain the AW-box featured
`with [CnTnG](n)7[CG] (Figure 6A). To test whether BnWRI1
`binds to the target DNA fragments containing the AW-box,
`the BnWRI1 protein was expressed in E. coli and purified for
`binding assays (Figure 6C). The DNA fragments of 250–300 bp
`that contained the AW-box [CnTnG](n)7[CG] in the promoter
`region of two representative genes known as KASI and GPAT9
`were amplified and used for EMSA. When BnWRI1 protein
`was incubated with the DNA fragment amplified from the KASI
`promoter containing the AW-box [CnTnG](n)7[CG], the target
`DNA was bound to BnWRI1, as indicated by the shifted bands at
`the top of gel when it was visualized under UV light (Figure 6D).
`However, when the DNA fragment with a mutant AW box
`[TnCnA](n)7[CG] was explored,
`the binding between the
`
`BnWRI1 and the DNA fragment was abolished, as shown by the
`observation that the DNA band position remaining unchanged
`in the gel (Figures 6B,D). A similar gel shift was observed
`when BnWRI1 protein was incubated with the DNA fragment
`containing an AW box [CnTnG](n)7[CG] from the promoter
`region of GAPT9 (Figure 6D). The binding was diminished when
`the consensus was mutated to [CnTnG](n)7[TA] for the GPAT9
`promoter (Figures 6B,D). A similar result was found when the
`DNA probes were labeled with biotin (Figure 6E). These results
`suggest that BnWRI1 specifically binds to the promoter region
`containing the AW-box, which is conserved with Arabidopsis
`WRI1, and the AW-box is essential for the interaction between
`BnWRI1 and the target gene promoters.
`
`Overexpression of BnWRI1 Up-regulates
`the Transcript Level of Genes in
`Glycolysis, Fatty Acid Synthesis, Lipid
`Assembly, and Flowering
`To investigate whether BnWRI1 OE up-regulated the transcript
`level of genes involved in the lipid anabolism process, RNA
`
`Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org
`
`7
`
`November 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 1015
`CSIRO Exhibit 1016
`
`

`

`Li et al.
`
`BnWRI1 in Flowering and Lipid Homeostasis
`
`FIGURE 6 | BnWRI1 binding to proximal upstream regions of genes involved in lipid anabolism. (A) The AW-box [CnTnG](n)7[CG] in the proximal upstream
`regions of genes involved in glycolysis, FA synthesis, and lipid assembly. (B) Consensus [CnTnG](n)7[CG] of the AW-box and its mutant AW-box [TnCnA](n)7[CG] of
`the KASI promoter or [CnTnG](n)7[TA] of GPAT9 promoter. (C) Recombinant BnWRI1 protein (50 kD) expressed in E. coli cells. (D) BnWRI1 specifically binds to the
`promoter region of KASI and GPAT9 containing the AW-box as assayed by EMSA. The binding was abolished when the conserved sequence was mutated into the
`[TnCnA](n)7[CG] of the KASI promoter or the [CnTnG](n)7[TA] of the GPAT9 promoter. The purified BnWRI1 protein (0.4 μg) was incubated with the target DNA
`fragment for 1 h. The resulting complex was visualized under UV light. The lanes from left to right: M, DNA ladder; KASI promoter only; BnWRI1 (0.4 μg) + KASI
`promoter; KASI mutant promoter only; BnWRI1 (0.4 μg) + KASI mutant promoter; GPAT9 promoter only; BnWRI1 (0.4 μg) + GPAT9 promoter; GPAT9 mutant
`promoter only; BnWRI1 (0.4 μg) + GPAT9 mutant promoter; BnWRI1 only. (E) The binding activity of BnWRI1 to the AW-box or its mutant AW-box (mAW) in the
`promoter regions of KASI and GPAT9 by EMSA using the DNA probes labeled with biotin. The shifted band is indicated by the arrow.
`
`was extracted from the leaves and analyzed by quantitative real-
`time PCR. These genes include PKp2 in glycolysis, BCCP2,
`MAT, KASI, ENR1, and acyl-ACP thioesterase (FATA) in the
`FA biosynthetic process, and GPAT9, LPAT2, and DGAT1 in
`lipid assembly. The transcript levels of the tested genes were all
`significantly higher in OE plants than in the WT. Despite the
`significant elevation of genes in multiple pathways by BnWRI1,
`the regulation of BnWRI1 in specific routes differs to variable
`extents. The transcript level of genes involved in glycolysis and
`FA synthesis including PKp2, MAT, KASI, ENR1, and FATA was
`up-regulated the most, and the expression levels in OE plants
`were more than twofold that of the WT (Figures 7A,B). The
`BnWRI1 enhanced expression of genes involved in FA synthesis
`was most prominent among the tested genes (Figure 7B).
`Moreover, RNA accumulation for the genes involved in lipid
`assembly was also strongly induced in OE plants. The mRNA
`level of GPAT9 in OE plants accumulated more than twofold
`that of the WT (Figure 7C). The LPAT2 and DGAT1 transcript
`levels were also substantially higher in OE than in WT plants
`(Figures 7C,D). In addition,
`the FLOWERING LOCUS T
`(FT) is a key regulator in the control of flowering time in
`several plant species, and the FT expression level in OE plants
`was threefold higher than that of the WT (Figure 7E). The
`results suggest that BnWRI1 synchronously promotes multiple
`pathways in transcriptional regulation to enhance the plant
`reproductive process, seed development, and oil accumulation in
`B. napus.
`
`The Effect of BnWRI1 on the Membrane
`Lipid Composition
`Most studies have focused on the effect of WRI1 on oil
`accumulation, but
`the effect of WRI1 on the membrane
`lipid composition remains elusive. The OE of BnWRI1 in
`B. napus leads to the involvement of numerous genes in
`glycolysis, FA biosynthesis, and the lipid assembly process,
`indicating its significance in lipid anabolism. To investigate
`the effect of BnWRI1 on various lipid metabolisms further,
`phospholipids and galactolipids from leaves or siliques during
`flowering stages were analyzed. The phosphatidylethanol (PE)
`and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) in leaves remained comparable
`between OE and WT plants (Figure 8A). However, BnWRI1
`OE resulted in a significant increase in MGDG, DGDG, and
`PC in leaves relative to their levels in WT plants (Figure 8A).
`The incre

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket