throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 10
`
` Date: December 3, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TRUTEK CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`PGR2021-00005
`Patent 10,736,931 B2
`____________
`
`Before ERICA A. FRANKLIN, ULRIKE W. JENKS, and
`SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Dismissing the Petition and Terminating the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.71(a), 42.72, 42.74
`
`

`

`PGR2021-00005
`Patent 10,736,931 B2
`With authorization of the Board, the parties filed a joint motion to
`dismiss the petition. Paper 7. The parties explain that dismissal is
`appropriate because they have reached an agreement that “completely
`resolves all pending controversies between the Patent Owner and the
`Petitioner concerning [US Patent 10,736,931 B2].” Id. at 2.
`The parties have filed a true copy of their written settlement
`agreement, Paper 8, and they “certify that there are no other agreements or
`understandings, oral or written, between them, including any collateral
`agreements, made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the dismissal
`of the present proceeding as set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 327(b),” Paper 7, 2. In
`the joint motion, the parties explain also that a joint motion to dismiss the
`related district court litigation, Trutek Corp. v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., Case
`No. 3:19-cv-17647-BRM-ZNQ (D.N.J. Sept. 5, 2019), is being filed in light
`of the settlement. Paper 7, 3–4.
`The parties correctly note that a Decision on Institution for this
`proceeding has not been entered and the merits of the proceeding have not
`been decided. Id. at 3.
`Based on the foregoing, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.71(a), 42.72, and
`42.74, we determine that it is appropriate to dismiss the petition and
`terminate the proceeding.
`Additionally, the parties filed a joint request that the settlement
`agreement be treated as business confidential information and kept separate
`from the file of the involved patent. Paper 9. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C § 327(b)
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, that request is granted also.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`PGR2021-00005
`Patent 10,736,931 B2
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`In accordance with the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the joint motion to dismiss the petition is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request for the settlement
`agreement, Paper 8, to be treated as business confidential information and
`kept separate from the file of the involved patent under the provisions of 35
`U.S.C. § 327(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the proceeding is terminated.
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Stanley Kremen
`uspto@patentsgroup.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael Dokhanchy
`Reza.dokhanchy@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket