throbber
251
`
`Stiiniilatioti of Prritable Tissues by Means oC an Alternating Magnetic Field.*
`( 2 m 9 )
`
`A u c x A N m x ~ U L I N , NORMAN 0. Ritii.1, A N D I’AU~, 1. HROBEKG
`(Introduced by I,. LV. Roth)
`Uepi . of Biophysics, Univrrsity of California, Los Angeles
`
`Observation of visual sensations not caused
`by light, by technicians working in the vici-
`nity of large choke coils carrying strong alter-
`nating currents, was reported by Thompson
`( 1). He was able to reproduce such an effect
`by exposing the head of human subjects to an
`extensive a1 ternating magnetic field generated
`inside a large coil. This phenomenon (“phos-
`phenes”) has also been studied by others( 2-5).
`The stimulation is evidently due to eddy cur-
`rents induced in the tissues exposed to the al-
`ternating magnetic field. No attempt has
`been made in any of these investigations to
`localize the stimulus. The nearest approach
`to a search for local effects of ,an alternating
`magnetic field was an attempt by Magpusson
`and Stevens(4) to stimulate a (cat’s nerve by
`disposing it transversely
`in a.n a1 ternating
`magnetic field. The result of this experiment
`was negative.
`Methods. The magnetic fields used in the
`above-mentioned experiments were obtained
`with electromagnets excited with low fre-
`quency a.c. (below 90 cps) as well as with in-
`termittent d.c. The observed light sensation
`was monochromatic (bluish white) ? flickering
`and strongest near the periphery of the retina.
`To obtain a more nearly localized effect in
`our experiments, a bar electrornagnet with a
`pyramidal pole tip, shown in Fig. 1, was con-
`structed. Distribution of the axial field in-
`tensity component is shown in the same dia-
`gram. Currents of 2 frequencies have been
`used to energize this magnet, 60 cps and 1,000
`cps. The maximum flux density obtained at
`the pole tip with the 60 cps source (a.c. line
`voltage) was 8,740 gauss (rms) and with the
`1.000 cps source (motor-generator set), 2,2 60
`gauss (rms) . In spite of the lower flux den-
`sity at 1,0001 cps, the induced eddy currents
`are stronger as compared to those induced at
`60 cps due to the proportionality of the in-
`* This work supported by grant from Office csf
`
`Naval Research.
`
`duced e.m.f. to rate of change of the magnetic
`field.
`Results. Observations of the phosphenes
`reported by previous authors have been veri-
`fied a t 60 cps. The flickering light sensation
`was strongest when the pole tip was held
`against the temporal area but could still be de-
`tected when the pole was placed against the
`occipital area. No other sensations or effects
`were observed in varying the location of the
`pole tip relative to different areas of the cor-
`tex.
`At 1,000 cps a new effect was observed
`when the magnet pole was close to the tem-
`ple. There was an intense sensation of nasal
`obstruction experienced by all subjects.
`It proved possible to stimulate frog nerves
`intensely at 60 cps as well as a t 1,000 cps by
`winding a nerve about the pole tip to form a
`closed one-turn bop. The pole tip was well
`insulated by a cap of acrylic plastic material
`(“Densoform”). A nerve-muscle preparation
`of a frog’s sciatic nerve attached to the gas-
`trocnemius muscle was used (Fig. 1). Tn-
`tense tetanic contractions of the muscle were
`obtained whenever the magnet was excited.
`Fig. 2 shows a record of the muscle contrac-
`tion with a simultaneous recording of the pat-
`tern of the stimulus. The latter recording was
`obtained by registration of the e.m.f. induced
`by the stimulating magnetic field in a loop
`surrounding the pole tip. The same effect
`has also been obtained in a substantially ho-
`mogeneous 60 cps magnetic field of 6,000
`gauss rms flux density. f t also proved pos-
`sible to stimulate contraction in excised frog
`muscles placed in a Petri dish and submerged
`in Ringer’s solution. The Petri dish was
`placed into the gap of an electromagnet gener-
`ating a 60 cps magnetic field in a 5 x 15 cm
`gap of 2.8 cm pole separation. The bottom
`of the Petri dish was parallel to the horizon-
`tally oriented poIe faces. Tetanic contractions
`olf freshly excised muscles were observed while
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ebm.sagepub.com
`
` at GEORGETOWN UNIV MED CTR on August 18, 2015
`
`Allergan EX1087
`
`

`

`252
`
`STIMULATION OF IRRITABLE TISSUES
`
`the magnetic field was on. Stimulation of the
`irritable tissues by the eddy currents induced
`in the contents of the Petri dish showed a de-
`pendence on their position in the dish as well
`as on their orientation. The maximum effect
`was observed when the muscle was placed
`near the rim of the Petri dish and no effect
`was seen when the muscle was a t the center.
`With the muscle placed near the rim, the con-
`traction was strongest when the longitudinal
`axis of the muscle was oriented tangentially
`and least strong or absent for the radial orien-
`tation. These observations are in accordance
`with the anticipated distribution of eddy cur-
`rents which flow along the rim of the Petri
`
`Pu
`
`FIG. 1. EM: laminated bar electromagnet generating
`a non-homogeneous alternating magnetic field the
`axial component of which is represented in the dia-
`gram as a function of distance from the pole face P.
`N: nerve forming a closed loop in magnetic field.
`M: frog's gastrocnemius muscle. C: wire loop sur-
`rounding pole tip of the magnet. R: rectifier which
`rectifies the a.c. signal induced in loop C. The recti-
`fied signal is recorded by one of the 2 recorder chan-
`nels. PC: photocell (International Rectifier Corp.
`type B-10) of
`the photoelectric device recording
`muscle contraction. L: light source. S: shutter which
`can be lifted by the string attached to frog leg. The
`shutter is actually flush with bottom of photocell PC.
`It is represented somewhat longer in the diagram to
`show the point of attachment of the string to which
`weight W is attached. When muscle contracts, shut-
`ter S and weight W are lifted thus exposing an in-
`creasing area of the photovoltaic cell PC to light from
`the source L. Voltage output of photocell is recorded
`by the second channel of the 2-channel recorder.
`
`TIME
`t
`
`FIG, 2. Temporal relationship between stimulus and
`response in electromagnetic stimulation. A. Photo-
`electrically recorded movement of frog leg produced
`by contraction of the gastrocnemius muscle. Muscu-
`lar contraction is evoked by stimulation of the nerve
`S of Fig. 1 through the current induced in it by the
`alternating magnetic field. B. The stimulus as a func-
`tion of time in arbitrary units as represented by recti-
`fied and filtered e.m.f. induced in loop C of Fig. 1.
`
`dish. The stimulating action of alternating
`magnetic fields depends on the induced eddy
`current density. It is reasonable to assume
`that an increase in intensity and, to a limited
`extent, in frequency of the alternating mag-
`netic field used would lead to observation of
`effects which were not observed at the eddy
`current densities produced under the condi-
`tions described above.
`Summary. Stimulation of frog nerves and
`of excised frog muscles submerged in Ringer's
`solution has been obtained without the use
`of electrodes by means of sinusoidal alternat-
`ing magnetic fields. This effect is due to eddy
`currents induced in conductive tissues and
`their surroundings. Visual and non-visual
`sensations have been induced in human sub-
`jects by non-homogeneous alternating mag-
`netic fields adjacent to the brain.
`The authors are indebted to Mr. R. T. Kado
`for valuable technical assistance.
`
`1. Thompson, S. P., Proc. R o y . Soc. B, 1910, v82,
`.196.
`2. D'Arsonval, M. A., C. R. Biol., Paris, 1896,
`v48, 450.
`3. Dunlap, K., Science, 1911, v33, 68.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ebm.sagepub.com
`
` at GEORGETOWN UNIV MED CTR on August 18, 2015
`
`Allergan EX1087
`
`

`

`CATIONS AND CANINE TAG
`
`2 53
`
`4. Magnusson, C. E., Stevens, H. C., Am. J .
`Physiol., 1911, v29, 124.
`5 . Barlow, H. B., Kohn, H. I., Walsh, E. G., ibid., Received July 16, 1959.
`
`1946, ~ 1 4 8 , 3'12.
`
`P.S.E.B.M., 1959, V102.
`
`Cation Specificity of Thrombocyte Agglutinating Activity ( T A g ) of C a n i n e
`(25210)
`Plasma.*
`R. G. MASON,+ E. C. LEROY~ AND K. RI. BRINXHOUS
`Dept. of Pathology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
`
`Canine plasma possesses the ability to ag-
`glutinate homologous and autologous platelets
`rapidly in the presence of Mg++ or &In++ (1).
`This property of plasma has been termed
`thrombocyte agglutinating activity (TAg) .
`TAg is contained in crude gNobulin fractions
`of plasma, but not in the albumin fractions.
`I t is non-dialyzable and heat-labile. TAg ap-
`pears to be separate from the plasma proco-
`agulants, fibrinogen and antihemophilic fac-
`tor, as well as from prothrombin and related
`BaS04-adsorbable factors. In this study TAg
`was tested for activity with 15 separate ca-
`tions. The active ions were studied further to
`determine the relative amounts needed for
`prompt agglutination of platelets with TAg.
`Methods. Details of the macroscopic plate-
`let agglutination test for TAg have been de-
`scribed( 1 ) . The test is done in 2 stages. In
`the first or incubation stage, canine plasma is
`incubated for 30 min. with a cation chloride
`solution. In the second or agglutination stage,
`a standard suspension of washed canine plate-
`lets is added to the incubation mixture and
`time and degree of agglutination determined.
`Three types of canine plasma were used.
`Resin plasma was prepared by use of Dowex
`50 resin columns( 1). Oxatate plasma has
`been described(2). EDTA plasma was pre-
`pared by mixing 9 parts of whole dog blood
`with one part of stock EDlTA solution( l ) ,
`previously diluted one to' 3.27 with normal
`saline. Plasma dialysis against 0.154 M NaCl
`was carried out with Visking casing (18 hr
`continuous agitation, 4°C). Adsorbed plas-
`mas (resin, oualate, or EDTA) were prepared
`* This investigation was suppcrted in part by
`grant from Nat. Heart Inst., N.J.H., P.H.S.
`t Post-Sophomore Research Fellow, N.I.H., P.H.S.
`
`by adding to' each ml plasma 100 mg Bas04
`(Merck) (contact time 30 min, 4°C) and re-
`peating the procedure once. In the prothrom-
`bin time test with adsorbed plasmas no clot
`formed in 10 min. The chloride salts of vari-
`ous cations were used; all salts were Baker
`A.R., except FeC13 (Mallincrodt) , PbCb
`(Fisher), and BaC12 (Merck) . Solutions
`were standardized by chloride analyses,
`and diluted to 0.108 M. For weaker so-
`lutions, serial 2-fold dilutions were made
`with 0.154 M NaC1. Cation concentration
`in
`the experiments
`is expressed as mM
`cation added per liter of plasma incubation
`mixture. Platelet suspensions( 1) were pre-
`pared from EDTA canine plasma and con-
`In several ex-
`tained 4 * lo5 platelets/cmm.
`periments, platelet preparation was modified
`by resuspending the platelets in solutions con-
`(Armour).
`taining 0.5% bovine albumin
`With this modification the platelet pellet could
`be resuspended rapidly, and platelet reactiv-
`ity was unchanged.
`TAg and B a S 0 4 adsorption of
`Results.
`plasma. A series of tests were performed to
`determine the effect of BaS04 adsorption of
`plasma on platelet agglutination by TAg. Fig.
`1 shows the results obtained with resin plasma
`before and after adsorption, With either Mgi+
`or Mn '+, rapid agglutination occurred, regard-
`less of plasma adsorption or cation concentra-
`tion used. Only with adsorbed plasma a t the
`lower A h + + concentrations were agglutination
`times less rapid
`than with non-adsorbed
`plasma. With Ca++, on the other hand, no
`agglutination occurred with adsorbed plasma;
`with non-adsorbed plasma, clotting occurred
`in the incubation phase and the resultant se-
`rum caused moderately rapid agglutination.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`ebm.sagepub.com
`
` at GEORGETOWN UNIV MED CTR on August 18, 2015
`
`Allergan EX1087
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket