`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Trials
`Aaron Olejniczak; Trials
`trittmaster@foley.com; mhouston@foley.com; Chris Liro; Ed Williams; jillj@andruslaw.com; Marie Mikolainis
`RE: PGR2021-00085 - Conference Call with Board regarding Proposed Motion to Enlarge Page Limits
`Thursday, March 10, 2022 1:47:41 PM
`
`Counsel:
`
`Patent Owner’s request is granted. Rather than filing a separate motion in this instance, we will
`treat as a motion itself Patent Owner’s email with the unopposed request to expand the page limits
`for its forthcoming Motion to Amend by 10 pages. Petitioner’s Opposition to the Motion to Amend
`may similarly include an additional 10 pages beyond the page limits provided by our rules. The
`Board does not believe a conference call is needed at this time.
`
` A
`
` copy of this email will be submitted for the record and will be considered an order on Patent
`Owner’s request and motion for expanded page limits for the Motion to Amend.
`
`If the parties have further questions related Patent Owner’s request or the relief being granted, they
`should promptly contact the Board.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Maria King
`Deputy Chief Clerk for Trials
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`703-756-1288
`
`
`
`
`From: Marie Mikolainis <mariem@andruslaw.com> On Behalf Of Aaron Olejniczak
`Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2022 10:03 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: trittmaster@foley.com; mhouston@foley.com; Aaron Olejniczak <aarono@andruslaw.com>;
`Chris Liro <chris.liro@andruslaw.com>; Ed Williams <ewilliams@andruslaw.com>;
`jillj@andruslaw.com; Marie Mikolainis <mariem@andruslaw.com>
`Subject: PGR2021-00085 - Conference Call with Board regarding Proposed Motion to Enlarge Page
`Limits
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear PTAB,
`
`We represent Patent Owner VA-Q-TEC AG. in proceeding PGR2021-00085 currently pending before
`
`
`
`the Board. We are writing to ask for a conference call with the Board so that we may discuss filing a
`Motion to Enlarge Page Limits for Patent Owner’s anticipated Motion to Amend, which is due Friday,
`March 11, 2022.
`
`In the Motion to Enlarge Page Limits, Patent Owner would like to request to page limit for its
`anticipated Motion to Amend be enlarged from 25 to 35 pages. The additional pages are necessary
`because claim reproduction is required to make the support and benefit showings required by the
`MTA rule. Merely reproducing any of these substitute claims in a MTA in order to show support
`therefore occupies substantial additional space. Indeed, the listing of the claims and associated
`support in the current draft MTA takes up over nine pages alone.
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Pelican Biothermal indicated they will not oppose such motion, if they are
`allowed a commensurate increase in the page limit for their Response to the Motion to Amend.
`
`The parties propose the call be scheduled
`Today after 1:30 pm Eastern/12:30 pm Central, or
`Friday, March 11 after 2:00 pm Eastern/1:00 pm Central.
`
`Counsel for Petitioner have been copied on this email.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Aaron T. Olejniczak
`Attorney
`Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP
`790 North Water Street, Suite 2200
`Milwaukee, WI 53202
`p 414.271.7590 │ f 414.271.5770
`e aarono@andruslaw.com │ vcard
`w andruslaw.com
`
`The contents of this message and any attachments are only for the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential, privileged,
`and/or otherwise legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient(s), it is strictly prohibited to use, copy or share any part of this message. Please
`destroy any copies of this message immediately and notify the sender if you received this message in error.
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
