throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Trials
`Stein, Alexander B.; Trials
`Heard, Preston; Moyles, Lisa; Rockman, J; Ney, Angela; Herman, Barry; Friedman, Ana; Das, Sujohn; Hawes, C.
`Erik; Story, Melissa; 697 Patent-PGR-Service
`RE: PGR2021-00097 - Request for Conference Call
`Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:48:29 PM
`
`Counsel,
`
`No conference call is necessary.
`
`The briefing on Petitioner’s motion for discovery is due to be completed on July 20, 2022. See Ex.
`3010 at 1. The current due date for Petitioner’s reply brief is July 12, 2022, and the current due date
`for Patent Owner’s sur-reply brief is August 23, 2022. See Paper 47 at 1. Because the motion
`briefing will not be completed until after Petitioner’s reply must be filed, the extensions proposed by
`Petitioner below provide a reasonable amount of additional time for the parties to address the
`evidence at issue, should Petitioner’s motion be granted.
`
`Thus, Petitioner’s reply brief is now due on July 29, 2022, and Patent Owner’s sur-reply brief is due
`on September 8, 2022.
`
`(Please note that this email will be added to the record as a 3000-series exhibit.)
`
`Thank you,
`
`Megan Carlson
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`(571) 272-1650
`Megan.Carlson@uspto.gov
`
`From: Stein, Alexander B. <alexander.stein@morganlewis.com>
`Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 11:49 AM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Heard, Preston <Preston.Heard@wbd-us.com>; Moyles, Lisa <LMoyles@moylesip.com>;
`Rockman, J <JRockman@moylesip.com>; Ney, Angela <Angela.Ney@wbd-us.com>; Herman, Barry
`<Barry.Herman@wbd-us.com>; Friedman, Ana <Ana.Friedman@wbd-us.com>; Das, Sujohn
`<sujohn.das@morganlewis.com>; Hawes, C. Erik <erik.hawes@morganlewis.com>; Story, Melissa
`<melissa.story@morganlewis.com>; 697 Patent-PGR-Service <697Patent-PGR-
`Service@morganlewis.com>
`Subject: RE: PGR2021-00097 - Request for Conference Call
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Your Honors,
`
`PGR2021-00097
`
`1
`
`Ex. 3011
`
`

`

`
`The parties have been discussing a potential stipulation to extend due dates 2 and 3 to account for
`this additional motion practice. Unfortunately, those discussions have reached an impasse, so the
`Board’s guidance is respectfully requested. The parties’ respective positions as to this scheduling
`dispute are provided below.
`
`
`Petitioners have suggested equal extensions of 16 days to due dates 2 and 3 (moving those
`deadlines to July 29th and September 8th, respectively), so that this motion practice would be
`complete before the next merits brief is filed.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s position is that Petitioners’ request (both for additional discovery and a
`resulting extension of time) is untimely. The parties negotiated an agreed production of
`certain materials as part of discovery on May 5, 2022. Petitioners did not seek additional
`materials until seven weeks later, June 23rd, or seek the Board’s intervention until July 2nd,
`twelve days before its reply brief date. Under the circumstances, and for additional reasons
`Patent Owner could explain on a conference call, further extensions to the schedule are
`unwarranted.
`
`
`The parties are available today (7/7) between 1pm-2pm eastern time to discuss, or are available
`tomorrow (7/8) between 9am-10:30am or 12-1pm eastern time to discuss.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`Alex Stein, Reg. No. 71,397
`Counsel for Petitioners
`
`Alexander B. Stein
`Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (Silicon Valley Office)
`(650) 843-7278 | Email My Assistant
`
`From: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2022 9:13 AM
`To: Stein, Alexander B. <alexander.stein@morganlewis.com>; Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Heard, Preston <Preston.Heard@wbd-us.com>; Moyles, Lisa <LMoyles@moylesip.com>;
`Rockman, J <JRockman@moylesip.com>; Ney, Angela <Angela.Ney@wbd-us.com>; Herman, Barry
`<Barry.Herman@wbd-us.com>; Friedman, Ana <Ana.Friedman@wbd-us.com>; Das, Sujohn
`<sujohn.das@morganlewis.com>; Hawes, C. Erik <erik.hawes@morganlewis.com>; Story, Melissa
`<melissa.story@morganlewis.com>; 697 Patent-PGR-Service <697Patent-PGR-
`Service@morganlewis.com>
`Subject: RE: PGR2021-00097 - Request for Conference Call
`
`[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
`Counsel,
`
`No conference call is necessary.
`
`PGR2021-00097
`
`2
`
`Ex. 3011
`
`

`

`
`Petitioner is authorized to file the requested motion for discovery. The motion shall be filed no later
`than July 13, 2022, and shall otherwise comply with the Board’s rules. Patent Owner may file an
`opposition no later than July 20, 2022, which shall also comply with the Board’s rules.
`
`Petitioner is not authorized a reply at this time.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Megan Carlson
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`(571) 272-1650
`Megan.Carlson@uspto.gov
`
`From: Stein, Alexander B. <alexander.stein@morganlewis.com>
`Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2022 2:16 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Heard, Preston <Preston.Heard@wbd-us.com>; Moyles, Lisa <LMoyles@moylesip.com>;
`Rockman, J <JRockman@moylesip.com>; Ney, Angela <Angela.Ney@wbd-us.com>; Herman, Barry
`<Barry.Herman@wbd-us.com>; Friedman, Ana <Ana.Friedman@wbd-us.com>; Das, Sujohn
`<sujohn.das@morganlewis.com>; Hawes, C. Erik <erik.hawes@morganlewis.com>; Story, Melissa
`<melissa.story@morganlewis.com>; 697 Patent-PGR-Service <697Patent-PGR-
`Service@morganlewis.com>
`Subject: PGR2021-00097 - Request for Conference Call
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Your Honors,
`
`Petitioners SWM and NexTier request a conference call with the panel in PGR2021-00097 to discuss
`a discovery dispute. In particular, the dispute relates to three sealed deposition transcripts that
`Patent Owner possesses from a related district court case, and those deposition transcripts include
`testimony from Patent Owner’s witnesses concerning aspects of the SafeJet System (the asserted
`product prior art at issue in this PGR). While the parties were able to resolve an initial dispute and
`Patent Owner did produce portions of the deposition transcripts, the unproduced portions of the
`deposition transcripts also appear likely to discuss the SafeJet System. Patent Owner has declined to
`produce the full deposition transcripts and associated exhibits.
`
`Accordingly, Petitioners respectfully request a conference call to discuss authorization to (i) file a
`motion to compel this routine discovery or, (ii) in the alternative, file a motion to obtain the three
`full deposition transcripts (and associated exhibits) as additional discovery.
`
`The parties are available on (i) July 5th from 9-11 AM or after 2 PM ET or (ii) July 6th from 9-11 AM or
`
`PGR2021-00097
`
`3
`
`Ex. 3011
`
`

`

`after 4 PM ET to discuss this request.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`Alex Stein, Reg. No. 71,397
`Counsel for Petitioners
`
`Alexander B. Stein
`Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP (Silicon Valley Office)
`(650) 843-7278 | Email My Assistant
`
`
`DISCLAIMER
`This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use
`of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an
`attorney-client communication and as such privileged and
`confidential and/or it may include attorney work product.
`If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review,
`copy or distribute this message. If you have received this
`communication in error, please notify us immediately by
`e-mail and delete the original message.
`
`PGR2021-00097
`
`4
`
`Ex. 3011
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket