`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`FORT WORTH DIVISION
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`DECLARATION OF MAURICE J. MARONGIU ON DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS
`
`
`
`MIDAS GREEN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
` PLAINTIFF,
`
`V.
`
`IMMERSION SYSTEMS LLC,
` DEFENDANT.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-00555-O
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`1 of 135
`
`
`
`Table of Contents
`I. Qualifications, Experience, and Publications .............................................................. - 3 -- 3 -
`II. Compensation .............................................................................................................. - 5 -- 5 -
`III.
`Prior Testimony ....................................................................................................... - 5 -- 5 -
`IV. Materials Considered. .............................................................................................. - 6 -- 6 -
`V. Summary of Opinions .................................................................................................. - 6 -- 6 -
`VI.
`The Patents-in-Suit and Relevant Technology ........................................................ - 7 -- 7 -
`A. Background Technology .......................................................................................... - 7 -- 7 -
`B. The Claims ............................................................................................................... - 7 -- 7 -
`VII. Claim Construction Principles ............................................................................. - 10 -- 10 -
`VIII. Level of Skill in the Art ....................................................................................... - 11 -- 11 -
`IX.
`Background Information ...................................................................................... - 11 -- 11 -
`X. Two Disputed Claim Terms/Phrases: ...................................................................... - 19 -- 19 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`2 of 135
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Maurice J Marongiu, declare, under penalty of perjury, as follows:
`
`1. I am a consulting engineer and expert on the subject of thermal management and
`
`engineering for electronics. I submit this Declaration in relation to Plaintiff’s Brief on Disputed
`
`Claim Terms for Construction of MIDAS GREEN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ("MGT" or
`
`“Plaintiff”). In particular, I submit this Declaration to provide relevant background information
`
`regarding the technology at issue in U.S. Patent No. 10,405,457 (the ‘457 Patent or "Patent-in-
`
`Suit") (attached as Exhibit 1), and U.S. Patent No. 10,820,446 (the ‘446 Patent or "Patent-in-Suit")
`
`(attached as Exhibit 2) and to set forth my opinions about the meaning of certain disputed claim
`
`terms in the ‘457 Patent and ‘446 Patent from the perspective of a person of ordinary skill in the
`
`pertinent field.
`
`I. Qualifications, Experience, and Publications
`2. The following is a brief summary of my background and qualifications. My background
`
`and qualifications are more fully set out in my curriculum vitae (CV), attached as Exhibit 3.
`
`3. My current position is President of MJM Engineering Co. and PCM Thermal Solutions.
`
`MJM Engineering Co. is a consulting firm specialized in the design and development of thermal
`
`management systems for electronics and telecommunications applications. PCM Thermal
`
`Solutions is a consulting firm specialized in the analysis, design, and development of thermal
`
`engineering applications.
`
`4. I received my B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at
`
`Urbana-Champaign in 1980. I received in 1982 my M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and, in 1985,
`
`I earned a doctorate in Mechanical Engineering, both degrees from the University of Illinois at
`
`Urbana-Champaign. The emphasis in my graduate studies was experimental/analytical methods
`
`applied to thermal and fluid mechanics problems to include electronics and telecom systems.
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`3 of 135
`
`
`
`5. I have over 10 years of engineering teaching experience in the thermal engineering areas.
`
`I was a visiting assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Texas A&M University at College
`
`Station, TX and adjunct assistant professor at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) in Chicago, as
`
`well as graduate teaching assistant at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I have taught
`
`heat transfer, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, thermal systems, thermal management,
`
`experimental methods, and other courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels as well as
`
`conducted research projects in thermal management, heat transfer and fluid mechanics.
`
`6. In 1995, I founded MJM Engineering Co. after several years of performing part-time
`
`consulting projects for the electronics/telecommunications industry in the Chicago area. My area
`
`of expertise is the thermal analysis, design, development, and troubleshooting of thermal
`
`management systems of electric, electronic and telecommunication components and systems as
`
`well as other engineering applications. My expertise includes heat exchanger design, thermal
`
`system design and optimization, fluid mechanics and convection heat transfer, and cooling of
`
`electronic systems, including phase change materials. I have been active professionally, being a
`
`member of ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers), IEEE (Institute of Electrical and
`
`Electronics Engineers), ISHM (International Society of Hybrid and Microelectronics), IEPS
`
`(International Electronics Packaging Society), Cryogenics Society of America, and AIAA
`
`(American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics). I was chairman of ASME Fox Valley Local
`
`Section and member of ASME Ad Hoc Computational Heat Transfer Committee. I am currently a
`
`contributor in Electronics Cooling, which is a paper and online magazine. I have taught
`
`undergraduate and graduate courses concerning fluid mechanics, heat transfer, thermodynamics,
`
`and thermal systems for over 10 years.
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`4 of 135
`
`
`
`7. As shown in my CV, I have authored or co-authored over 20 publications. I am an inventor
`
`of a U.S. patent (US 8,541,721) titled “Wake Generating Elements for Joule Heating or Infrared
`
`Heating”.
`
`II. Compensation
`8. I am being compensated for my time spent on this matter at the rate of $150/hr. plus
`
`reasonable expenses. My compensation is not related to the outcome of this action, and I have no
`
`financial interest in this case.
`
`III. Prior Testimony
`9. Although I have been hired to consult as expert (with the intention to provide testimony as
`
`requested), I have not testified as an expert in any litigation during the last four years. However, I
`
`have served as an expert witness in the following cases in the last 4 years:
`
`a) LINDA ANDREW a/k/a JANE DOE, a Florida resident, Plaintiff, v. RADIANCY, INC.,
`
`a foreign corporation; PHOTOMEDEX, INC., a foreign corporation; and DOLEV
`
`RAFAELI, a New Jersey Resident, Case Nr. 6:16-CV-1061-ORL-37GJK, UNITED
`
`STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA,
`
`ORLANDO DIVISION, 2017;
`
`b) Manufacturing Resources International, Inc. Plaintiff, v. Civiq Smartscapes, LLC, Civiq
`
`Holdings, LLC, Comark, LLC, and Comark Holdings, LLC, Case Nr. 17 cv-00269-UN,
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE 2018;
`
`and
`
`c) 3M COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. NEOLOGY, INC. and EQUITY PARTNERS VI, L.P.,
`
`Case Nr. C.A. No. N18C-07-089 AML CCLD, SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE
`
`OF DELAWARE, 2020.
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`5 of 135
`
`
`
`IV. Materials Considered.
`10. In preparing this declaration, I have considered the ‘457 Patent and its prosecution history,
`
`as well as the prosecution histories of family member patents related to the ‘457 Patent, including
`
`provisional application numbers 61/737,200 and 61/832,211. I have considered the ‘446 Patent,
`
`its prosecution history, as well as the prosecution histories of family member patents related to the
`
`‘446 Patent, including application number 14/355,533 and provisional application 61/832,211. I
`
`have also considered PCT application PCT/US2013/075126 corresponding to U.S. application
`
`14/355,533. I have considered the parties' claim construction disclosures, and the other materials
`
`identified in Exhibit 4 – Exhibit 10 attached to this Declaration. I also relied upon my over 35
`
`years of general experience in the field, though the testimony I offer is from the person of ordinary
`
`skill as I have defined it below.
`
`V. Summary of Opinions
`11. I understand that MGT has filed the present lawsuit against IMMERSION SYSTEMS,
`
`INC. (“Defendant” or “Immersion”) and alleges infringement of claims 1, 5, 6, 10, 11 and 14 of
`
`the ‘457 Patent and claims 1, 5, 6 and 10 of the ‘446 Patent.
`
`12. I understand the parties dispute the meaning of the following terms/phrases used in the
`
`claims of the ‘457 and ‘446 Patents:
`
` "overflow lip ... adapted to facilitate [substantially uniform recovery]"
`
` "weir ... adapted to facilitate [substantially uniform recovery]"
`
`13. If called as a witness to testify at a claim construction hearing, I expect to testify on the
`
`following topics and provide opinions and testimony on what is summarized in this declaration:
`
` The ‘457 and ‘446 Patents including their specifications, claims and prosecution history,
`
`and the science underlying what is disclosed in the ‘457 and ‘446 Patents.
`
` The level of ordinary skill in the art to which the ‘457 and ‘446 Patents are directed.
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`6 of 135
`
`
`
` My opinions on how the disputed terms/phrases identified in paragraph above would
`
`have been interpreted by a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention.
`
`14. In my opinion, a person of ordinary skill in the art on the earliest priority date (i.e.,
`
`December 14, 2012) for claims in the ‘457 Patent and '446 Patent would have no trouble to
`
`ascertaining the meaning of these two terms/phrases. In particular, such a person of ordinary skill
`
`in the art would have interpreted the terms as set forth below:
`
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Claim Term
`“a weir … having an overflow lip adapted to
`facilitate substantially uniform recovery”
`
`“a weir … adapted to facilitate substantially
`uniform recovery”
`
`Proper Interpretation
` “a weir … having an overflow edge or boundary
`capable of easing or helping substantially uniform
`recovery”
` “weir … capable of easing or helping substantially
`uniform recovery”
`
`VI. The Patents-in-Suit and Relevant Technology
`15. The '457 Patent is titled APPLIANCE IMMERSION COOLING SYSTEM and generally
`
`relates to cooling of electric/electronic appliances. The '446 Patent is titled APPLIANCE
`
`IMMERSION COOLING SYSTEM and generally relates to cooling of electric/electronic
`
`appliances.
`
`A. Background Technology
`16. For the purposes of this case, it is useful to have a basic understanding of thermal
`
`management of electronics components to include the following relevant technologies: heat
`
`transfer, fluid mechanics, thermal systems, and control systems for thermal systems.
`
`B. The Claims
`17. The '457 Patent contains 16 total claims, consisting of 3 independent claims and 13
`
`dependent claims. As noted above, I understand that MGT is asserting infringement of claims 1,
`
`5, 6, 10 and 14. The ‘446 Patent contains 10 claims, consisting of 2 independent claims and 8
`
`dependent claims. As noted above, I understand that MGT is asserting infringement of claims 1,
`
`5, 10.
`
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`7 of 135
`
`
`
`18. The disputed claim terms identified in Paragraph 12, above, appear in the asserted claims
`
`as follows:
`
`a) Claim 1 of the ‘457 Patent:
`
`“An appliance immersion cooling system comprising:
`
`a tank adapted to immerse in a dielectric fluid a plurality of electrical appliances, each in a
`
`respective appliance slot distributed vertically along, and extending transverse to, a long wall
`
`of the tank, the tank comprising:
`
`a weir, integrated horizontally into the long wall of the tank adjacent all appliance slots, having
`
`an overflow lip adapted to facilitate substantially uniform recovery of the dielectric
`
`fluid flowing through each appliance slot; and;
`
`a dielectric fluid recovery reservoir positioned vertically beneath the overflow lip of the weir
`
`and adapted to receive the dielectric fluid as it flows over the weir;
`
`a primary circulation facility adapted to circulate the dielectric fluid through the tank, comprising:
`
`a plenum, positioned adjacent the bottom of the tank, adapted to dispense the dielectric fluid
`
`substantially uniformly upwardly through each appliance slot;
`
`a secondary fluid circulation facility adapted to extract heat from the dielectric fluid circulating in
`
`the primary circulation facility, and to dissipate to the environment the heat so extracted; and
`
`a control facility adapted to coordinate the operation of the primary and secondary fluid circulation
`
`facilities as a function of the temperature of the dielectric fluid in the tank.”
`
`
`
`b) Claim 5 of the ‘457 Patent:
`
`“The system of claim 1 wherein the control facility further comprises a communication facility
`
`adapted to facilitate monitoring and control of the control facility from a remote location.”
`
`
`
`c) Claim 6 of the ‘457 Patent:
`
`“A tank module adapted for use in an appliance immersion cooling system, the tank module
`
`comprising:
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`8 of 135
`
`
`
`a tank adapted to immerse in a dielectric fluid a plurality of electrical appliances, each in a
`
`respective appliance slot distributed vertically along, and extending transverse to, a long wall
`
`of the tank, the tank comprising:
`
`a weir, integrated horizontally into the long wall of the tank adjacent all appliance slots, having
`
`an overflow lip adapted to facilitate substantially uniform recovery of the dielectric
`
`fluid flowing through each appliance slot; and;
`
`a dielectric fluid recovery reservoir positioned vertically beneath the overflow lip of the weir
`
`and adapted to receive the dielectric fluid as it flows over the weir;
`
`a primary circulation facility adapted to circulate the dielectric fluid through the tank, comprising:
`
`a plenum, positioned adjacent the bottom of the tank, adapted to dispense the dielectric fluid
`
`substantially uniformly upwardly through each appliance slot; and
`
`a control facility adapted to control the operation of the primary fluid circulation facility as a
`
`function of the temperature of the dielectric fluid in the tank.”
`
`
`
`d) Claim 10 of the ‘457 Patent:
`
`“The module of claim 6 wherein the control facility further comprises a communication facility
`
`adapted to facilitate monitoring and control of the control facility from a remote location.”
`
`
`
`e) Claim 14 of the ‘457 Patent:
`
`“The module of claim 11 wherein the control facility further comprises a communication facility
`
`(62, 64) adapted to facilitate monitoring and control of the control facility from a remote
`
`location.”
`
`
`
`f) Claim 1 of the ‘446 Patent:
`
`“An appliance immersion cooling system comprising:
`
`a tank adapted to immerse in a dielectric fluid a plurality of electrical appliances, each in a
`
`respective appliance slot distributed vertically along, and extending transverse to, a long wall
`
`of the tank, the tank comprising:
`
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`9 of 135
`
`
`
`a weir, integrated horizontally into the long wall of the tank adjacent all appliance slots,
`
`adapted to facilitate substantially uniform recovery of the dielectric fluid flowing
`
`through each appliance slot;
`
`a primary circulation facility adapted to circulate the dielectric fluid through the tank, comprising:
`
`a plenum, positioned adjacent the bottom of the tank, adapted to dispense the dielectric fluid
`
`substantially uniformly upwardly through each appliance slot;
`
`a secondary fluid circulation facility adapted to extract heat from the dielectric fluid circulating in
`
`the primary circulation facility, and to dissipate to the environment the heat so extracted; and
`
`a control facility adapted to coordinate the operation of the primary and secondary fluid circulation
`
`facilities as a function of the temperature of the dielectric fluid in the tank.”
`
`
`
`g) Claim 5 of the ‘446 Patent:
`
`“The system of claim 1 wherein the control facility further comprises a communication facility
`
`adapted to facilitate monitoring and control of the control facility from a remote location.”
`
`
`
`h) Claim 10 of the ‘446 Patent:
`
`“The module of claim 6 wherein the control facility further comprises a communication facility
`
`adapted to facilitate monitoring and control of the control facility from a remote location.”
`
`
`
`VII. Claim Construction Principles
`19. I understand that claim construction is the process by which a court determines, as a matter
`
`of law, the scope and meaning of terms used in the claims of a patent. I further understand that the
`
`goal of this process is to give claim terms the meaning they would have had to a person of ordinary
`
`skill in the art (“POSA”) at the time of the invention, after reading the entire patent and prosecution
`
`history.
`
`20. I further understand that it is possible that the patent specification and/or file prosecution
`
`history may reveal a special definition given to a claim term by the patentee that differs from the
`
`
`
`- 10 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`10 of 135
`
`
`
`meaning it would otherwise have to a POSA. In such cases, I understand that the patentee's
`
`definition usually controls.
`
`21. I understand that the prosecution history of a patent can inform the meaning of some claim
`
`language and must be taken into account in construing the claims.
`
`22. I understand that, in some cases, the court may consider extrinsic evidence, such as
`
`technical dictionaries, treatises, and expert opinions, to understand the underlying technology and
`
`the way in which claim terms would be understood by a POSA at the relevant time. However, I
`
`also understand that such extrinsic evidence should not be used to vary, contradict, expand, or limit
`
`the claim language from how it is defined in the specification or prosecution history.
`
`23. I understand that a patent can be held invalid for indefiniteness if its claims, viewed in light
`
`of the specification and prosecution history, fail to inform with reasonable certainty those skilled
`
`in the art about the scope of the invention. I further understand that definiteness is to be evaluated
`
`from the perspective of someone with skill in the relevant art at the time that the patent was filed.
`
`VIII. Level of Skill in the Art
`24. Having reviewed the ‘457 and ‘446 Patents and their prosecution history, in my opinion, a
`
`person of ordinary skill in the art would have had at least a B.S. degree in the field of mechanical
`
`engineering, or a similar science or engineering degree, and 5-10 years of experience with thermal
`
`systems and thermal management of electronics. For the purpose of this declaration, I understand
`
`the time of invention to be late in the year 2012.
`
`IX. Background Information
`25. A background of the words “weir” and “plenum” is appropriate when considering the
`
`contested terms as summarized in Section V.
`
`a) “weir”
`
`
`
`- 11 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`11 of 135
`
`
`
`26. The term “weir” appears in claims 1, 5, 6, 10, 11, 14 of the ‘457 Patent and also appears in
`
`claims 1, 5, 6, 10 of the ‘446 Patent. The term “weir,” means “an overflow structure or barrier that
`
`determines the level of liquid.”
`
`27. The term “weir” appears in the ‘457 Patent specification and drawings at: Abstract, FIGS.
`
`5, 6, 11, 12, 13; Column/line – 3:1-6, 3:16-19, 3:23-25, 3:39-63, 4:30-34, 4:57-58, 8:22, 9:7-24,
`
`9:37-46, 10:20-29, and 10:65-11:3. The term appears in the ‘446 Patent specification and drawings
`
`at: Abstract; FIGS. 5, 6, 11, 12, 13; Column/line – 3:3-8, 3:18-21, 3:25-27, 3:38-58, 4:29-34, 4:57-
`
`60, 8:25, 9:10-27, 9:42-45, and 10:26-29.
`
`28. A weir, generally, can be (and was at the time the ’457 patent was filed) a structure used
`
`in open channels that carry liquids, to control flow and determine the level of the liquid, such as
`
`water. Holding ponds and industrial tanks for handling liquids may include a weir. As one
`
`exemplary reference (hereafter, the “CTG Website”) teaches “in industrial cleaning systems, weirs
`
`perform two basic functions. The first is to establish and control liquid level in a tank or other
`
`vessel. The other is to selectively remove floating contaminants from the surface of a liquid.”
`
`29. A basic weir as used in industrial cleaning applications as taught by the CTG Website.
`
`When the liquid level in the tank exceeds that of the weir, liquid overflows the weir. Figure 1
`
`(below) illustrates two arrangements of industrial tanks for handling liquids, where each liquid
`
`tank includes a weir. As shown in Figure 2 from the CTG Website , weirs may be used to
`
`determine the liquid level in a tank and regulate the flow or discharge of liquid from the tank to
`
`another location.
`
`
`
`- 12 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`12 of 135
`
`
`
`Figure 1 Illustration of Weir Operation1
`
`
`
`Figure 2 Example of Weirs used to Transfer Liquid to Another Location2
`
`
`
`30. Weirs generally are structures that have horizontal, vertical and thickness components or
`
`dimensions. The horizontal and vertical components are perpendicular to the channel flow or tank.
`
`Furthermore, weirs have a vertical component from the bottom of the upstream liquid body to the
`
`overflow height. These points are illustrated by another exemplary reference, hereafter
`
`
`1 Cleaning Technologies Group, LLC, publisher https://techblog.ctgclean.com/2014/10/weirs/, accessed April
`18, 2021
`2 Cleaning Technologies Group, LLC, publisher https://techblog.ctgclean.com/2014/10/weirs/, accessed April
`18, 2021
`
`
`
`- 13 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`13 of 135
`
`
`
`Thermopedia. Figure 3 illustrates the 3-dimensionality of channel flow control provided by a
`
`typical weir.
`
`
`
`Figure 3 Illustration of Weir 3-Dimensionality3
`
`31. In general, weirs have been classified as simple or complex; what they have in common is
`
`a boundary that separates a body of liquid from the targeted discharge. Furthermore, simple weirs’
`
`vertical walls may cause the liquid to overflow along edges along the boundary. In complex weirs,
`
`the edge changes along the horizontal component; in other words, complex weirs have divided
`
`horizontal component sections, and when the vertical component exceeds the edge, it is a separator
`
`of the segments of the edge. This is shown in Figure 4, below, excepted from the
`
`Openchannelflow.com website.
`
`32. Complex weirs can be composed of consecutive orifices (circular weirs), slots (both
`
`vertical and horizontal), holes, notches, or "saw-tooth" edges deployed along the horizontal edge
`
`of a boundary; these may be contiguous or separated by a preselected distance. In another example,
`
`from the Nano-Reef.com website, Figure 5 shows an example of a weir using slots; moreover,
`
`circular weirs are variant of these slotted holes.
`
`
`3 Thermopedia-TM, Jader R Barbosa, Executive Editor, https://thermopedia.com/content/1259/, Accessed
`April 18, 2021
`
`
`
`- 14 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`14 of 135
`
`
`
`
`Figure 4 Photograph of Segmented Weir along Horizontal Boundary4
`
`Figure 5 Weir on 3 Walls made of Slots5
`
`
`
`33. Furthermore, circular weirs are variant of the slotted weirs. Figure 6 below, from the
`
`Openchannelflow.com website, shows a circular weir adapted to control flow in a culvert. Figure
`
`
`4 Openchannelflow.com/tracomfrp, publisher, https://www.openchannelflow.com/blog/circular-weirs-for-
`measuring-flows-in-partially-full-pipes, Accessed April 18, 2021
`5 Nano-Reef.com Community, Christopher Marks Founder, https://www.nano-reef.com/forums/topic/25717-
`third-diy-overflow-box/, accessed April 18, 2021
`
`
`
`- 15 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`15 of 135
`
`
`
`7 below, from the thesis paper by Armond Dudley Barefoot, shows still another example of a
`
`circular hole operating as a weir. Similarly, Figure 8 shows a series of circular weirs. It is of note
`
`that weirs vertical components may end at the fluid level or may be submerged.
`
`
`Figure 6 Circular Weir Inside a Culvert6
`
`
`
`
`6 Openchannelflow.com/tracomfrp, publisher, https://www.openchannelflow.com/blog/circular-weirs-for-
`measuring-flows-in-partially-full-pipes, Accessed April 18, 2021
`
`
`
`- 16 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`16 of 135
`
`
`
`Figure 7 Example of a Single Circular Weir7
`
`Figure 8 Example of Multiple Circular Weirs8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7 M.S. Thesis, "The Hydraulic Properties of Orifices and Circular Weirs with a 45 Degree Slope," by Armond
`Dudley Barefoot, MS Degree, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 1953, p16
`8 M.S. Thesis, "The Hydraulic Properties of Orifices and Circular Weirs with a 45 Degree Slope," by Armond
`Dudley Barefoot, MS Degree, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 1953, p40
`
`
`
`- 17 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`17 of 135
`
`
`
`b) “plenum”
`
`34. The term “plenum” appears in claims 1, 5, 6, 10, 11, 14 in the ‘457 Patent and claims 1, 5,
`
`6, and 10 of the ‘446 Patent. The term “plenum” means “a structure for dispensing liquid.”
`
`35. The term “plenum” also appears in the ‘457 Patent specification and drawings at: Abstract;
`
`FIGS. 1, 5, 6, 11, 13; Column/line – 3:1-6, 3:13-19, 3:52-56, 4:17-26, 4:27-32, 4:55-58, 6:45, 6:49-
`
`54, 7:12-19, 8:22, 9:7-24, 9:38-42, 10:21-25, and 10:66-11:3. The term appears in the ‘446 Patent
`
`specification and drawings at: Abstract; FIGS. 1, 5, 6, 11, 13; Column/line – 3:1-6, 3:13-19, 3:52-
`
`56, 4:17-26, 4:27-32, 4:55-58, 6:45, 6:49-54, 7:12-19, 8:22, 9:10-27, 9:42-45, and 10:26-29.
`
`36. In tanks for handling liquids, generally, a plenum is a structure having a space to collect
`
`incoming liquid for the subsequent dispensing of the liquid to various locations. As described in
`
`the specification and shown in FIGS. 1, 7, 8, and 9 of the ‘457 Patent and ‘446 Patent, the plenum
`
`is a structure that collects the incoming liquid (e.g., dielectric fluid) and dispenses the liquid (e.g.,
`
`dielectric fluid) substantially uniformly upwardly through each appliance slot.
`
`37. One function of the plenum is to change the liquid flow from the incoming liquid velocity
`
`to discharge velocity based on the inlet and outlet cross-sectional areas. As shown, for example,
`
`in FIG. 8 of the ‘457 Patent, the liquid (e.g., dielectric fluid) is constrained to collect and then exit
`
`through predesigned outlets such as orifices or nozzles. As shown, for example, in FIG. 10 of the
`
`‘457 Patent, the outlets are located and sized to direct the flow of liquid towards various locations.
`
`A definition is considered, which is “plenum”: the whole of space regarded as being filled with
`
`matter (opposed to vacuum,) Merriam-Webster.9
`
`
`9 “Plenum - a space or all space every part of which is full of matter” Merriam-Webster's Unabridged
`Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://unabridged.merriam-webster.com/unabridged/plenum. Accessed May 4,
`2021.
`
`
`
`- 18 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`18 of 135
`
`
`
`38. Additionally, a POSA would understand that a plenum will include non-chamber structures
`
`for dispensing a liquid such as a network of pipes used to collect and then dispense liquid as
`
`illustrated in Figure 9.
`
`Figure 9 Illustration of Plenum Structure Embodiment
`
`
`
`
`
`X. Two Disputed Claim Terms/Phrases:
` “a weir … having an overflow lip adapted to facilitate substantially uniform
`
`recovery”
`
` “a weir … adapted to facilitate substantially uniform recovery”
`
`39. The first term/phrase above -- “a weir … having an overflow lip adapted to facilitate
`
`substantially uniform recovery” -- appears in the ‘457 Patent claims 1, 5, 6, 10.This first
`
`term/phrase also appears in the specification and drawings in the ‘457 Patent Specification at:
`
`Abstract, FIGS. 1, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13; Column/line – 2:59-61, 3:1-6, 3:13-19, 3:23-25, 3:39-63, 4:30-
`
`34, 4:57-58, 8:22, 9:7-24, 9:37-46, 10:20-29; and 10:65-11:3.
`
`
`
`- 19 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`19 of 135
`
`
`
`40. Each of the words in the above first term/phrase has a plain and ordinary meaning that a
`
`POSA will easily comprehend. The term “weir” has the meaning discussed above, i.e., an overflow
`
`structure or barrier that determines the level of a liquid. Obviously, from the context, the “overflow
`
`lip” is part of the weir. The overflow lip is the part of the weir over which liquid flows. Therefore,
`
`a person having ordinary skill in the art will understand that “a weir … having an overflow lip”
`
`means an “overflow edge or boundary of the weir.”
`
`41. The term “adapted to” simply means “suitable for” or “capable of.” The term “facilitate”
`
`means “to make easier” or “to help bring about.”10
`
`42. So the above phrase simply means “a weir…having an overflow edge or boundary capable
`
`of easing or helping to bring about the substantially uniform recovery (of the dielectric fluid
`
`flowing through each appliance slot).” A POSA should have no problem understanding the
`
`meaning of this phrase.
`
`43. The second term/phrase above --“a weir … adapted to facilitate substantially uniform
`
`recovery" appears in claims 1 and 6 of the ‘446 Patent.
`
`44. The term also appears throughout the specifications of both of the patents-in-suit, for
`
`example, in the ‘457 Patent specification and drawings at: Abstract, FIGS. 5, 6, 11, 12, 13;
`
`Column/line – 3:1-6, 3:16-19, 3:23-25, 3:39-63, 4:30-34, 4:57-58, 8:22, 9:7-24, 9:37-46, 10:20-
`
`29, and 10:65-11:3, and in the ‘446 Patent specification and claims at: Abstract; FIGS. 5, 6, 11,
`
`12, 13; Column/line – 3:3-8, 3:18-21, 3:25-27, 3:38-58, 4:29-34, 4:57-60, 8:25, 9:10-27, 9:42-45,
`
`and 10:26-29.
`
`
`10 Facilitate – “to make easier : help bring about” Merriam-Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, Merriam-
`Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/facilitate Accessed May 27, 2021
`
`
`
`- 20 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`20 of 135
`
`
`
`45. Similar to the above, each of the words in the above second term/phrase has a plain and
`
`ordinary meaning that a POSA will easily comprehend. As before, the term “weir” has the
`
`meaning discussed above, i.e., an overflow structure or barrier that determines the level of a liquid.
`
`46. As before, the term “adapted to” simply means “suitable for” or “capable of.” And as
`
`before, the term “facilitate” means “to make easier” or “to help bring about.”
`
`47. So the above second disputed term/phrase simply means “a weir… capable of easing or
`
`helping to bring about the substantially uniform recovery (of the dielectric fluid flowing through
`
`each appliance slot).” Again, in my opinion, a POSA should have no problem understanding the
`
`meaning of this phrase.
`
`48. I am informed that Immersion has taken the position that the above two terms/phrases
`
`found in various claims of the two patents-in-suit render the two patents to be indefinite.
`
`49. I understand that a patent is indefinite if its claims, read in light of the specification and the
`
`prosecution history, fail to inform, with reasonable certainty, those skilled in the art about the scope
`
`of the invention. It is my opinion that there is nothing in the above two phrases that fail to inform
`
`a POSA about the scope of the claimed invention with reasonable certainty. Indeed, as
`
`demonstrated above, the proper meaning of these two phrases is simple to understand.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 21 -
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (U.S. 10,820,446 B2)
`21 of 135
`
`
`
`Immersion Systems LLC – Ex. 1022
`PGR 2021-00104 (