throbber
NIH Public Access
`Author Manuscript
`Gene Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 May 19.
`Published in final edited form as:
`Gene Ther. 2008 November ; 15(21): 1411–1423. doi:10.1038/gt.2008.90.
`
`Development of optimal bicistronic lentiviral vectors facilitates
`high-level TCR gene expression and robust tumor cell recognition
`
`S Yang, CJ Cohen, PD Peng, Y Zhao, L Cassard, Z Yu, Z Zheng, S Jones, NP Restifo, SA
`Rosenberg, and RA Morgan
`Surgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of
`Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
`
`Abstract
`In human gene therapy applications, lentiviral vectors may have advantages over γ-retroviral vectors
`in several areas, including the ability to transduce nondividing cells, resistance to gene silencing and
`a potentially safer integration site profile. However, unlike γ-retroviral vectors it has been problematic
`to drive the expression of multiple genes efficiently and coordinately with approaches such as internal
`ribosome entry sites or dual promoters. Using different 2A peptides, lentiviral vectors expressing
`two-gene T-cell receptors directed against the melanoma differentiation antigens gp100 and MART-1
`were constructed. We demonstrated that addition of amino-acid spacer sequences (GSG or SGSG)
`before the 2A sequence is a prerequisite for efficient synthesis of biologically active T-cell receptors
`and that addition of a furin cleavage site followed by a V5 peptide tag yielded optimal T-cell receptor
`gene expression. Furthermore, we determined that the furin cleavage site was recognized in
`lymphocytes and accounted for removal of residual 2A peptides at the post-translational level with
`an efficiency of 20–30%, which could not be increased by addition of multiple furin cleavage sites.
`The novel bicistronic lentiviral vector developed herein afforded robust anti-melanoma activities to
`engineered peripheral blood lymphocytes, including cytokine secretion, cell proliferation and lytic
`activity. Such optimal vectors may have immediate applications in cancer gene therapy.
`
`Keywords
`T-cell receptor; adoptive immunotherapy; tumor immunity; lentivirus; 2A peptide
`
`Introduction
`The genetic engineering of human lymphocytes as a potential therapy for inherited, acquired
`or infectious disease requires efficient transfer and expression of the transgene. In the case of
`adoptive immunotherapy for cancer, naturally occurring antitumor T-cell receptors (TCRs)
`have been used to endow normal T cells with antitumor reactivity.1 In a recent clinical trial,
`we demonstrated the successful conferral of antitumor function through ex vivo γ-retroviral
`transduction of a MART-1-reactive TCR gene into the peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs)
`in patients with metastatic melanoma resulted in clinical tumor responses.2 Although
`successful in demonstrating the potential of this cancer gene therapy approach, there are several
`limitations to current γ-retroviral vector-based gene transfer systems.
`
`Correspondence: Dr RA Morgan, Surgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health,
`10 Center Drive, Building 10, CRC 3W-3864, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. E-mail: E-mail: rmorgan@mail.nih.gov.
`Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Gene Therapy website (http://www.nature.com/gt)
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Replimune Limited Ex. 2019 - Page 1
`Transgene and Bioinvent International AB v. Replimune Limited
`PGR2022-00014 - U.S. Patent No. 10,947,513
`
`

`

`Yang et al.
`
`Page 2
`
`In T-cells, the level of transgene expression is modulated by the activation state of the cell,3
`and γ-retroviral based vectors have been shown to be subject to gene silencing in certain cell
`types,4,5 and they have a preference for integration near transcription start sites,6 which may
`increase the potential for insertional mutagenesis. Furthermore, the current γ-retroviral vector
`based protocols require T cells to be fully activated for efficient transduction and this may be
`deleterious to their function.7,8 We previously reported that in a murine model, prolonged ex
`vivo stimulation yielded fully differentiated effector T cells which were capable of in vitro
`tumor killing and high-level INF-γ release but, exhibited inferior activity for in vivo tumor
`treatment compared to naive and less differentiated effectors.9 Finally, there is a growing need
`for gene delivery systems to carry multiple genes in one construct, and γ-retroviral vectors
`have a limited coding capacity (<7 kb).
`
`Lentiviral vectors with their larger coding capacity and ability to more easily express complex
`expression cassettes may be advantageous in this regard compared to γ-retroviral vectors.10,
`11 An example of a clinically important multi-gene construct is a tumor-associated antigen
`TCR, which is a heterodimer of TCR-α and -β chains.12 The TCRs for a variety of tumor-
`associated antigens (TAA) have been identified including the MART-1 and gp100 melanoma
`differentiation antigens, the NY-ESO-1 cancer-testis antigen and the p53 tumor suppressor.
`13–18 An important aspect of TCR expression vector design is that, the TCR-α- and -β chains
`must be coordinately expressed for proper biologically activity.12
`
`The most common strategy for the expression of multiple genes has been based on internal
`ribosome entry site (IRES) elements.19 However, bicistronic lentiviral vectors containing
`IRES elements have consistently demonstrated a biased expression of two transgenes with the
`second gene being under expressed.20–22 We confirmed these reports (data not shown) and
`thus assembled a series of dual promoter-containing lentiviral vectors to express the α- and β-
`TCR chains, but consistently failed to achieve a high percentage of TCR expression in PBL (S
`Jones, data not shown). Naldini and co-workers recently reported that lentiviral vectors
`coordinately expressing two genes could be assembled using a synthetic bidirectional
`promoter,21 but this synthetic promoter exhibited poor activity in PBL (approximately 5–10%
`of transduced cells expressed both genes). An alternative to these approaches is the use of
`ribosomal skipping via 2A peptides.23,24 Several viruses use 2A peptides to mediate protein
`cleavage, including foot-and-mouth disease virus (F2A), equine Rhinitis A virus, porcine
`teschovirus-1 (P2A) and Thosea asigna virus (T2A). The 2A peptide consensus motif
`(DVEXNPGP) is extremely rare and is associated with cleavage-like activity between 2A and
`2B genes through a ribosomal skip mechanism; the 2A peptide impairs normal peptide bond
`formation between 2A and 2B without affecting the translation of 2B. 2A peptides have been
`shown in γ-retroviral vectors to initiate the production of up to four proteins both in vitro and
`in vivo.24,25 When exogenous genes are linked using this approach, about 18 amino acids are
`left on the C terminus of the first gene and a single proline residue remains on the N terminus
`of the second gene. Although linking of the TCR-α and -β chains by 2A peptide has been
`reported,25 the effect of the residual amino acids on the function of expressed TCR has not
`been fully explored. In this study, we inserted a furin protease recognition site ahead of the 2A
`peptide to obtain a more native TCR chain by post-translational processing. Furin is a
`ubiquitous subtilisin-like proprotein convertase, whose natural substrates include certain serum
`proteins and growth factor receptors, such as the insulin-like growth factor receptor. The
`consensus sequence for furin cleavage is RXXR but the potential for actual cleavage is
`dependent on substrate tertiary structure and the amino acids immediately surrounding the
`recognition site.26
`
`Herein, we developed a novel bicistronic lentiviral vector that combines a furin cleavage site,
`and an aminoacid spacer followed by a 2A ribosomal skip peptide. When the spacer sequence
`was augmented by the addition of a synthetic V5 peptide tag sequence, this specifically boosted
`
`Gene Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 May 19.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Replimune Limited Ex. 2019 - Page 2
`Transgene and Bioinvent International AB v. Replimune Limited
`PGR2022-00014 - U.S. Patent No. 10,947,513
`
`

`

`Yang et al.
`
`Page 3
`
`protein processing and resulted in a lentiviral vector capable of mediating high-level TCR
`expression in transduced lymphocytes.
`
`Results
`2A peptides along with furin and spacer facilitate transgene expression
`In preliminary experimentation, we investigated several strategies such as dual promoters or
`IRES, to drive a two-gene TCR expression cassette, but none of these lentiviral vectors yielded
`significant levels of TCR expression (data not shown). Encouraged by the successful use of
`2A peptides in γ-retroviral vectors to express multiple genes in one construct,24,25,27 we
`attempted to develop lentiviral vectors expressing antitumor antigen-specific TCRs using
`different 2A peptides. In Figure 1a, the amino acids from different 2A peptides are illustrated
`and the conservative domains highlighted. We utilized T2A, F2A and P2A to link the α- and
`β-chains of a murine TCR that specifically recognized the human melanoma differentiation
`antigen gp100 (154–162) (Figure 1b). It has been reported that in γ-retroviral constructs,
`expression of multiple genes linked with 2A peptides can be facilitated by a spacer sequence
`(GSG) ahead of the 2A peptides.25,27 We designed several constructs combining a spacer
`(SGSG or GSG) and furin (R-A-K-R)28 cleavage site with different 2A peptides in bicistronic
`lentiviral vectors (Figure 1b).
`
`To compare the ability of different 2A peptide linkers to express TCRs, lentiviral vectors were
`used to transduce human T-cell lines Jurkat-T3 and SupT1. All the constructs, irrelevant to the
`origin of 2A peptides (T2A, F2A, P2A), functioned to produce the TCR in these two cell lines
`as demonstrated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis following gp100
`tetramer staining (Figure 1c). In contrast to a previous report,29 the addition of furin to the 2A
`peptide inhibited TCR expression, whereas furin plus the addition of spacer sequences (GSG
`or SGSG) enabled highly efficient gene expression (up to 95%). While active in T-cell lines,
`these constructs produced significantly less TCR in primary PBL (<34% tetramer+;
`Supplementary Figure 1).
`
`Addition of peptide tags increases TCR expression
`In an attempt to optimize TCR expression in primary human T cells, we determined the
`maturation events of the expressed precursors proteins. The lack of available α- and β-chain
`antibodies that functioned in western blot analysis necessitated the addition of peptide tags.
`The V5 synthetic peptide tag was added between the furin cleavage site and the amino-acid
`spacer-F2A sequence (at the C terminus of α-chain) and a hemagglutinin (HA) tag was added
`to the C terminus of the β-chain (Figure 2a). As depicted in Figure 2a, when 2A peptides initiate
`a ribosomal skip during translation, two molecules can result: the TCR-α chain with an F2A
`residual peptide (including the V5 tag), and the TCR-β chain with an HA tag. If the furin site
`is additionally recognized, this leads to the production of the TCR-α chain without the V5 tag.
`Western blotting with anti-HA antibody demonstrated approximately 90% efficiency of
`processing of the β-chain in the T-cell lines (Figure 2b, quantitation not shown). When the
`anti-V5 antibody was used for western blot analysis, a relatively lower percentage of the α-
`chain was detected, which was likely caused by the loss of the V5 tag following furin cleavage
`(Figure 2a). On the basis of the difference in processing detected by the two antibodies, we
`estimated that cleavage at the furin site occurred at a post-translational level of 28% in SupT1
`and 19% in Juarkt-T3 cells (Figure 2b, compare HA and V5 blots, quantitation not shown).
`Interestingly, this ‘tag-modified’ vector also showed enhanced tetramer staining in the two
`transduced T-cell lines (data not shown).
`
`We next tested whether the superior performance of the tag-modified vector also applied to
`primary human PBL. PBLs were transduced with peptide tag vectors with or without a furin
`
`Gene Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 May 19.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Replimune Limited Ex. 2019 - Page 3
`Transgene and Bioinvent International AB v. Replimune Limited
`PGR2022-00014 - U.S. Patent No. 10,947,513
`
`

`

`Yang et al.
`
`Page 4
`
`cleavage site (Figure 2c). By western blot analysis we observed a similar pattern of TCR chain
`maturation (Figure 2b, right panel) as described in T-cell lines, where furin contributed to 28%
`cleavage at the post-translational level in primary PBL (quantitation not shown). The
`unexpectedly high protein processing of the F2A fusion protein with the V5 and HA peptide
`tags led us to further investigate the biological properties of this tag-modified vector. When
`primary PBLs were transduced with the tag-modified vectors, we observed a significant
`enhancement in TCR expression measured by tetramer staining using the vector with a furin
`site and peptide tags (Figure 2c). The lower tetramer staining observed without the furin site
`suggested that post-translational cleavage at the furin site may be important in the maturation
`of the TCR heterodimer in transduced human PBL.
`
`Furin plus V5 is critical for optimal TCR expression in PBL
`We next systematically tested the biological activities of several 2A linker modifications
`following transduction of PBL from melanoma patients. Analysis of PBL transduced with the
`vectors containing the furin site and peptide tags demonstrated a significant and reproducible
`improvement in TCR production (Figure 3a) as measured by both an increased transduction
`rate (66% versus 38%) and enhanced expression per cell mean fluorescence intensity ((MFI)
`211 versus 84). To test the antigen reactivity of the expressed TCR, transduced cells were co-
`cultured with peptide-pulsed cells and specific dose-dependent induction of interferon (IFN)-
`γ was demonstrated (Figure 3a, right panel). The level of IFN-γ induction was correlated with
`the transduction rate and MFI, that is, the TCR with the peptide tags was more active than TCR
`without the peptide tags. To further define the role of the tag sequences, the V5 and HA tags
`were removed and the various combinations tested in one experiment (Figure 3b). As depicted
`in Figure 3c, the combination of a furin cleavage site followed by the V5 peptide tag sequence
`showed the highest amount of TCR expression in transduced PBL (image 5). Removal of the
`HA tag did not affect the performance of the vector (compare images 5 versus 6). Removal of
`the furin site significantly decreased TCR expression from the vector (compare images 5 and
`7). The tag-modified vectors also demonstrated superior biological activity when transduced
`PBLs were co-cultured with peptide-pulsed T2 cells (Figure 3d). To address whether the few
`residual amino acids from 2A peptide affect the functionality of expressed TCR, we monitored
`TCR activity using a γ-retroviral construct where TCR-α and -β chains were linked by an IRES
`(this arrangement produced α- and β-chains without residual amino acids). When compared to
`PBL expressing similar amounts of TCR by tetramer staining (images 4 versus 8) the level of
`IFN-γ induction was similar in both vectors (Figure 3d), indicating that the extra amino acids
`added to the TCR-α and -β chains using the 2A linker approach did not significantly affect the
`functionality of this TCR.
`
`We next screened a series of linker peptides inserted between furin and F2A sequences to
`determine if the specific amino acids in the V5 peptide influenced the enhanced biological
`activity of this construct (Figure 3e). In two constructs we dissected the V5 into two parts and
`accordingly made the two constructs as depicted in Figure 3e (second and third images). Next,
`we replaced the V5 peptide with a synthetic hinge region commonly used in chimeric TCR
`constructs30 ((G4S)2, construct 4) or naturally occurring hinge regions from primate
`immunoglobulins31 (constructs 5–8). The original vector with the furin site plus the complete
`V5 peptide (construct 9) consistently displayed the highest level of TCR expression, whereas
`other vectors showed a performance similar to the vector where furin was linked directly to
`F2A (construct 10).
`
`To verify the applicability of this novel molecular strategy to other TCR, we constructed a
`human anti-MART-1 TCR linked by furin-V5-SGSGF2A in the same lentiviral vector
`backbone (Figure 4a). This TCR, DMF5 was previously shown to be highly reactive against
`MART-1 expressing melanoma tumor cell lines.32 Similar to the mouse anti-gp100 TCR
`
`Gene Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 May 19.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Replimune Limited Ex. 2019 - Page 4
`Transgene and Bioinvent International AB v. Replimune Limited
`PGR2022-00014 - U.S. Patent No. 10,947,513
`
`

`

`Yang et al.
`
`Page 5
`
`vector, superior performance was observed in two patient PBL transduced with a vector where
`the TCR chains were linked with a furin site plus the V5 peptide (Figure 4b). We observed
`enhancement not only in the number of tetramer-positive cells (60–69 and 61–75%) but also
`in expression measured by MFI (74–88 and 63–78). When transduced PBLs were co-cultured
`with antigen expressing human lymphocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-matched tumor line 624, we
`observed a significant increase in IFN-γ production in one of the donors tested, while a modest
`increase in cytokine production was observed with the other donor (Figure 4c). As the
`magnitude of increased biological activity was less pronounced than noted for the gp100 TCR,
`thus it is possible that the improved function of V5 peptide linked TCR constructs may vary
`depending on the genes involved.
`
`One furin site is sufficient for TCR maturation
`In a last series of vectors, we tested alternatives to the single furin cleavage site. Some naturally
`occurring growth factors like insulin-like growth factor I are synthesized as a proprotein that
`is converted to the mature form by cleavage within a unique pentabasic-processing motif
`(KXXKXXRXXRXXR) containing four furin recognition sites. We tested if these tetra-furin
`sites when engineered into the vector could further improve the performance of the vector. In
`Figure 5, we assembled two constructs where tetra-furin sites were inserted either with the V5
`tag or directly fused to the F2A peptide. These vectors were used to transduce PBL, and TCR
`expression assayed by tetramer staining. FACS data demonstrated that the vectors with tetra-
`furin sites did not improve TCR expression compared to the vector with a single furin site
`(compare images 3–5 and images 2–4). When tetra-furin was combined with the V5 peptide,
`we again observed an improvement in TCR expression (compare images 4 and 5), indicating
`that the V5 peptide tag facilitated the cleavage by endoproteolysis at the tetra-furin site.
`
`Both TCR-engineered CD4 and CD8 cells recognize and kill tumor cells
`As a final test of the optimized vector design, we transduced melanoma patient PBL with the
`anti-gp100 TCR vectors and analyzed these engineered cells for anti-melanoma activity. The
`ability to expand following encounter with tumor antigen in vivo may be essential to successful
`TCR gene therapy. To test the proliferative capacity the V5 peptide-containing vectors, we
`transduced PBL from a melanoma patient with the V5 tag-containing F2A vectors and
`determined antigen-specific cell proliferation (Figure 6a, left panel). When the TCR-
`engineered PBLs were co-cultured with melanoma tumor cell lines, the gp100 TCR-engineered
`PBL underwent proliferation with HLA-A2+-matched gp100+ melanoma cell line 624, but not
`with control tumor lines (Figure 6a). The specific TCR used in these studies, gp100 (154–162),
`has been determined to be CD8-independent (L Cassard, manuscript in preparation). To test
`TCR activities in potential helper versus killer T cells, we separated CD4 and CD8T cell subsets
`from PBL by negative selection, and the purified lymphocytes were transduced with the V5
`peptide tag-containing TCR lentiviral vector. The expression of TCR and purity of CD4 or
`CD8 was analyzed by FACS analysis (Figure 6b). The CD4 cells were 89% tetramer-positive,
`whereas the CD8T cells were 56% tetramer-positive (the difference in transduction efficiency
`may relate to the growth of the cells during the time of transduction, as the growth rate of CD4
`was greater than CD8 cells, data not shown). The biological activity of the TCR-engineered
`CD4 and CD8T cells were tested by co-culture with melanoma tumor lines. Both T-cell subsets
`exhibited significant release of IFN-γ to HLA A2-matched tumor cells (Figure 6c). Lastly,
`tumor cell lysis by the TCR-engineered CD4/CD8 lymphocytes was determined by 51Cr release
`assay following co-culture with two HLA A2+ and two HLA A2− melanoma lines (Figure 6d).
`Both CD4 and CD8 TCR-transduced T cells demonstrated specific lytic activity and as
`expected, CD8T cells lysed tumors to a greater extent than CD4T cells.
`
`Gene Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 May 19.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Replimune Limited Ex. 2019 - Page 5
`Transgene and Bioinvent International AB v. Replimune Limited
`PGR2022-00014 - U.S. Patent No. 10,947,513
`
`

`

`Yang et al.
`
`Page 6
`
`Discussion
`Lentiviral vectors were developed in the mid-1990s by adopting strategies defined over the
`past decade to optimize γ-retroviral vectors for safety and effectiveness.33,34 Lentiviral
`vectors can integrate in nondividing cells, making them more effective than γ-retroviral vectors
`for gene transfer to postmitotic or slowly dividing cells, which may include hematopoietic stem
`cells and naive T cells.35 The lentiviral vector used in this report contain several elements
`previously shown to enhance vector function, including a central polypurine tract (cPPT) for
`improved replication and nuclear import,36 a promoter from the murine stem cell virus
`(MSCV), which has been shown to lessen vector silencing in some cell types,37,38 a
`woodchuck hepatitis virus post-transcriptional responsive element (WPRE) for improved
`transcriptional termination,39 and the backbone was a deleted 3′-LTR self-inactivating (SIN)
`vector design that may have improved safety, sustained gene expression and antisilencing
`properties.5,40–42
`The ability of lentiviral vector to transduce minimally stimulated T cells43 may have significant
`advantages. In vitro analysis of human T cells transduced with γ-retroviral vectors following
`T-cell activation indicated that both TCR Vβ usage and global gene expression patterns were
`altered44,45 and such changes may affect the in vivo survival and function of gene-modified
`T cells. The use of a transgenic mouse model of adoptive cell transfer (ACT)46 also indicated
`that ex vivo stimulated and fully differentiated effector T cells, where inferior for in vivo tumor
`treatment compared to naive or less differentiated T cells (this was despite the fact that they
`demonstrated superior in vitro tumor killing and high-level IFN-γ release).9 We recently
`confirmed and extended these observations in this murine model of ACT by demonstrating
`that TCR gene transfer into stimulated murine splenocytes was less efficacious than T cells
`containing the same TCR isolated from transgenic mice.47 These reports suggested that the
`ability to use lentiviral vectors to genetically modify T lymphocytes at a less differentiated
`stage may have important applications in cancer immunotherapy.
`
`The individual α- and β-chains of the TCR heterodimer must be expressed at equal levels for
`full biologically activity.12 In the case of TCR gene transfer into mature T cells, there is an
`additional complication that the introduced genes must compete with the endogenous TCR
`chains for TCR complex assembly. If mixed heterodimers were formed, they would not
`recognize their appropriate target antigens, and while mixed heterodimer formation can be
`lessened by protein modifications,48,49 the individual α- and β-chains must still be optimally
`expressed. A common strategy for multiple gene expression has relied on IRES element, but
`the use of these elements in bicistronic lentiviral vectors was demonstrated to lead to biased
`expression of the transgenes.20–22,50 Although it has been reported that lentiviral vectors
`containing two independent internal promoters transferred high-level expression of multiple
`transgenes,20 we consistently failed to achieve a high percentage of TCR expression using this
`approach in PBL (data not shown). Naldini and co-workers recently developed lentiviral
`vectors coordinately expressing dual-genes driven by synthetic bidirectional promoters.21
`While they observed coordinated gene expression in various cells and tissues, these synthetic
`promoters exhibited lower activities in activated (10%) and naive PBL (5%).
`
`Encouraged by the successful use of 2A peptides in γ-retroviral vectors to express multiple
`genes in one construct,24,25,27,51 we attempted to develop lentiviral vectors expressing
`antitumor antigen TCR using different 2A peptides for adoptive immunotherapy. The main
`advantage of using 2A peptides in the construction of bicistronic vectors is the potential for
`co-expression of both genes at equal levels. Our western blot analysis indicated that cleavage
`of the polyprotein occurred approximately 90% of the time (Figure 2), thus assuring near
`stoichiometric synthesis of the TCR-α- and -β chains. A potential disadvantage in the use of
`2A peptides is the residual amino acids left on the C terminus of the first protein with the
`
`Gene Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 May 19.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Replimune Limited Ex. 2019 - Page 6
`Transgene and Bioinvent International AB v. Replimune Limited
`PGR2022-00014 - U.S. Patent No. 10,947,513
`
`

`

`Yang et al.
`
`Page 7
`
`potential for inappropriate targeting of proteins to different subcellular organelles.52 The
`residual 2A peptide left on the α-chain did not appear to significantly affect TCR function in
`comparison to an α-chain without these residues (Figure 3), but this observation is likely gene
`specific as we have observed the loss of biological activity of cytokine genes produced using
`2A peptides (data not shown).
`
`The concern for optimizing TCR gene expression led us to compare three 2A peptides-T2A,
`F2A and P2A,25,29 and consistent with published observations,21,50 2A peptides alone failed
`to achieve high level of TCR expression (Figure 1). Interestingly, when these 2A peptides were
`combined with spacer sequences (SGSG or GSG) and a furin cleavage site, there was
`significant increase in TCR expression (>95%) in T-cell lines, but expression in transduced
`PBL was significantly lower (generally 20%; Supplementary data). This result suggested a
`failure of 2A peptide-mediated ribosomal skipping in PBL, and led us to perform protein-
`processing studies using TCRs modified with peptide tags compatible with western blot
`analysis. This analysis led to the surprising observation that a vector in which the furin cleavage
`site was followed by a V5 peptide tag significantly improved TCR expression compared to
`TCR vectors without the tag. Although the precise mechanism that accounts for enhanced
`processing is unknown, we speculate that the specific V5 peptide sequence may permit
`enhanced ribosomal skipping in this context. Attempts to substitute other sequences for the V5
`peptide were unsuccessful (Figure 3e), suggesting that the specific amino-acid sequence of the
`V5 peptide may be involved in the enhanced activity. This effect was observed with both
`murine and human TCRs.
`
`By western blotting (Figure 2), we saw a robust processing of the TCR 2A fusion protein into
`the individual α- and β-chains (more than 90% of the initial polyprotein as processed). By
`analyzing TCR-α chain fused with V5 tag we observed that post-translational cleavage at furin
`site occurred approximately 30% of the time. Cleavage could not be enhanced using a naturally
`occurring tetra-furin sequence and this sequence may have inhibited the ribosomal skip, as
`TCR expression was lower in tetra-furin sequence-containing vectors (Figure 5). Taken
`together, the combination of a single furin cleavage site followed by a V5 peptide tag plus a
`2A ribosomal skip peptide represents a unique molecular strategy, which may overcome
`technical difficulties using 2A peptides in lentiviral vectors to express multiple genes in one
`construct.
`
`This report also points out the importance of testing transgene expression in the ultimate target
`cell. On the basis of the data from human T-cell lines (where >95% of the simple 2A constructs
`were processed and expressed), we might have concluded TCR vector design to be optimized.
`The fact that TCR expression in PBL was generally less than one quarter of the activity in T-
`cell lines lead to the continued refinement in vector design such that all current TCR vectors
`now produce robust expression in transduced primary human lymphocytes. Recently, Levine
`et al.53 reported on a phase 1 clinical trial using lentiviral vectors that demonstrated efficient
`and safe gene delivery to patients’ T cells with good persistence in vivo. The novel bicistronic
`lentiviral vectors harboring specific antitumor TCR described herein provide the opportunity
`not only for sustained transgene expression but also new methodologies to modify T
`lymphocytes at a less differentiated stage, and may have important applications in cancer
`immunotherapy.
`
`Materials and methods
`Cell culture
`
`PBLs used in this study were from metastatic melanoma patients seeking treatments at Surgery
`Branch, National Cancer Institute. Briefly, PBLs were collected by leukapheresis, and
`lymphocytes were separated by Ficoll/Hypaque cushion centrifugation, washed and
`
`Gene Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 May 19.
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`NIH-PA Author Manuscript
`
`Replimune Limited Ex. 2019 - Page 7
`Transgene and Bioinvent International AB v. Replimune Limited
`PGR2022-00014 - U.S. Patent No. 10,947,513
`
`

`

`Yang et al.
`
`Page 8
`
`resuspended at a concentration of 1 × 106 per ml in AIM-V medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
`CA, USA) supplemented with 300 IU ml−1 interleukin IL-2 and 5% heat-inactivated human
`AB serum (Valley Biomedical, Winchester, VA, USA). CD4+- and CD8+-enriched
`populations were separated using a magnetic beads-based method for both negative and
`positive selection of these subsets (Invitrogen). The other cell lines used in this study, including
`a human lymphoid cell line SupT1, (ATCC, CRL-1942), a T-cell acute leukemia, Jurkat
`(ATCC, TIB-152) and a lymphoblastoid cell line deficient in TAP function, T2 (Starter, 1985)
`were maintained in RPMI-1640 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with heat-
`inactivated 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 U ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine
`and 25 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer solution.
`Melanoma cells included MART-1-positive HLA-A2+ 624, 526 and two MART-1-positive
`HLA-A2− cells 888 and 938. Other lines included breast cancer line MDA231 (HLA-A2+
`MART-1 negative), 293T and 293FT (Invitrogen) that were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified
`Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin,
`2 mM L-glutamine, 20 μM 2-mercaptoenthanol and 25 mM HEPES buffer solution. All cell
`lines were cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2-humidified incubator.
`
`Peptide synthesis
`Peptides in this study were synthesized using a solid-phase method on a peptide synthesizer
`(Gilson, Middleton, WI USA) at the Surgery Branch (NCI). The quality of peptide was
`evaluated by the mass spectrometry (Biosynthesis, Lewisville, TX, USA). The peptides used
`in this study are as follows: gp100 (154–162) (KTWGQYWQV) and control influenza peptide
`(GILGFVFTL).
`
`Vector construction
`The lentiviral constructs utilized are from pLenti6/V5-D-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and
`pRRLSIN.cPPT. MSCV/GFP.WPRE harboring a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene driven
`by MSCV U3 promoter (S Jones, unpublished data). Mouse TCR (sp0.01 A-α and -β,
`DQ452619 and DQ452620) targeting gp100 (154–162) melanoma differentiation antigen was
`screened and established in Surgery Branch (L Cassard, unpublished data). MSGV1-154-AIB
`(γ-retroviral construct with gp100 (154) TCR gene linked with IRES) and MSGV-154-A2AB
`(γ-ret

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket