throbber
International Bureau
`
`(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(19) World Intellectual Property
`Organization
`
`1111111111111111 IIIIII IIIII 111111111111111 II Ill 111111111111111 IIIII IIIII IIII IIIIIII IIII 11111111
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(10) International Publication Number
`(43) International Publication Date
`
`WO 2015/079334 Al
`4 June 2015 (04.06.2015) WIPO I PCT
`
`� �
`
`(81)
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`
`
`
`
`(51) International Patent Classification:
`
`
`A0IN 37/44 (2006.01) A0IN 43/653 (2006.01)
`
`
`
`
`kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM,
`A0IN 37/34 (2006.01) A0IN 43/54 (2006.01)
`AO,AT,AU,AZ,BA,BB,BG,BH,BN,BR,BW,BY,
`A0IP 3/00 (2006.01)
`BZ,CA,CH,CL,CN,CO,CR,CU,CZ,DE,DK,DM,
`
`DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT,
`(21) International Application Number:
`
`
`HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR,
`PCT/IB2014/06489 l
`
`KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG,
`
`MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM,
`
`
`
`PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC,
`27 September 2014 (27.09.2014)
`
`SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN,
`English
`
`TR, TT, TZ, VA, VG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
`
`
`
`(25) Filing Language:
`
`(22) International Filing Date:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(26) Publication Language:
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`
`
`1336/KOL/2013 26 November 2013 (26.l l .2013) IN
`
`English
`(84)
`Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every
`
`
`
`
`
`
`kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH,
`
`
`
`GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ,
`
`TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU,
`
`
`(71) Applicant: UPL LIMITED [IN/IN]; Agrochemical Plant,
`
`TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE,
`
`
`
`
`
`Durgachak, Midnapore Dist., West Bengal, Haldia 721 602
`
`
`
`
`DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU,
`(IN).
`
`
`
`
`LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK,
`
`
`
`
`SM, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ,
`Inventors: DE OLIVEIRA, Gilson, Aparecido, Herme­
`
`
`
`
`
`GW, KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`
`
`negildo; United Phosphorus do Brasil Ltda, Avenida
`
`
`Jandira, 257, Cjt 142 / 143, Indianapolis, Sao Paulo -SP
`
`
`
`(BR). SHROFF, Jaidev, Rajnikant; Uniphos House,
`
`
`
`
`
`Madhu Park, l l th Road, Khar (West), State of Maha­
`
`patent (Rule 4.17 (ii))
`
`rashtra, Mumbai 400 052 (IN). SHROFF, Vikram, Ra­
`
`
`
`
`jnikant; Uniphos House, Madhu Park, l l th Road, Khar
`
`
`(West), State of Maharashtra, Mumbai 400 052 (IN).
`
`Declarations under Rule 4.17:
`
`as to applicant's entitlement to apply for and be granted a
`
`as to the applicant's entitlement to claim the priority of the
`
`
`
`
`
`earlier application (Rule 4.17 (iii))
`
`(72)
`
`;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
`
`-
`
`--
`
`-;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
`
`
`;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
`
`(74) Agents: MAJUMDAR, Subhatosh et al.; S Majumdar & Published:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CO, 5, Harish Mukherjee Road, Kolkata 700025 (IN). with international search report (Art. 21 (3))
`
`- -
`
`--
`
`--;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
` -;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
`
`
`
`-;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
`
`-
`
`- --
`
`-;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
` -
`
`-;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
`;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
`
`- -
`
`--;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
` -
`
`
`
`(54) Title: A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING RUST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(57) Abstract: A combination comprising a multi-site contact fungicide, a first systemic fungicide and optionally a second systemic
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fungicide and a method using the same.
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1007
`Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`1
`
`A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING RUST
`
`Technical Field of the invention:
`
`The present invention relates to a method for the prevention and/or treatment of
`
`phytopathogenic fungi. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method of using
`
`fungicides for the prevention and/or treatment of Asian soybean rust in leguminous plants.
`
`Background of the invention:
`
`The fungus of the genus Phakopsora is known to infect legumes. Two most prominent strains
`
`of the genus are Phakopsora pachyrhizi and Phakopsora meibmniae. Soybean rust caused by
`
`Phakopsora pachyrhizi is the most damaging disease affecting the yield of leguminous plants
`
`causing widespread damage to crops and depleting yield from 10 to 90% if not treated in
`
`tirne. Commonly known as Asian Soybean Rust (ASR), Phakopsora pachyrhizi infections
`
`must be detected early and treated early so as to prevent the geographic spread of the disease,
`
`which is airborne and causes severe loss of yield. l11e disease spreads through spores called
`
`urediniospores which are carried through the environs, resulting in wide spread damage. l11e
`
`disease earlier restricted to Asia and Australia has spread to Africa and in the past two
`
`decades, spread to South and North America. The first detection in the Americas was in
`
`2001 in South America; from there it spread to North America where it was first detected in
`
`2004.
`
`Phalwpsora pachyrhizi is known to infect over 30 legumes including commercially
`
`important edible beans as well as kudzu. l11e additional host crops serve as a reservoir for
`
`spores which can settle over the winter on the host crops and then spread in warmer weather.
`
`Early detection and treatment of Phakopsora is very essential to prevent the spread of disease
`
`and the loss of yield. Fungicides typically recommended for the treatment of this disease
`
`include Qo inhibitors (Quinone outside inhibitors), DM inhibitors (demethylation inhibitor),
`
`SDH Inhibitors (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors). These fungicides when applied alone
`
`provided some control but, resistance ·was quickly observed, specifically in DM inhibitors (K
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`2
`
`Schmitz et.al, Pest Management Science, Vol. 69, Issue 10 (2013)). Combination of Qo
`
`and DM inhibitors are also kno\vn in the art for the treatment of the disease, however, the
`
`treatment is not effective in controlling the disease and improving yields at the same time.
`
`Also, resistance to DM inhibitors effectively renders such combination compositions useless
`
`as the ASR strains can effectively overcome the effects of DM inhibitors. Venancio et.al
`
`(Poster #24, 201 1 Field Crops Rust Symposium) taught the use of combination of
`
`stroilurins (Qo inhibitors) and triazoles (DM inhibitors) for the treatment of ASR, the control
`
`of the disease was found to be favorable; however, yield was significantly low, and some
`
`combinations showed lower disease control and significantly poor yield. Older studies have
`
`demonstrated the use of multi-site inhibitor fungicides such as chloronitriles and
`
`dithiocarbamate for the treatment of Soybean Rust; however, none of the multi-site inhibitor
`
`fungicides were successful in the control of the disease or the increase in yield.
`
`The most important factor in Soybean Rust is the loss of foliage that results in the loss of
`
`nutrients and decrease in the overall yield of the crop. Numerous papers have been published
`
`that demonstrate moderate increase in yield with the application of fungicides. However,
`
`there is a need for a method of treatment that demonstrates improved yields along with
`
`preventive and/or curative capabilities in the treatment of Soybean Rust.
`
`Compositions comprising the single actives used in the treatment of ASR have demonstrated
`
`very little control as compared to combinations, however, the cost and concentrations of such
`
`combination fungicides used in the treatment of ASR is significantly higher. There is
`
`therefore a need in the art for a method of treatment that provides excellent control over
`
`Asian Soybean Rust in host plants, as well as provides high yields, maintain nutrition and
`
`quality of the plants.
`
`Hartrm1n, G. L, Samfazmi, K lVL. and Tschanz, A. 1'., Sd.t'.n.Hfic eds. 19�}2, Amwtated
`
`bibliography e�l soybean
`rust
`(Phakopsora pachyrhizi Sydow), A VRDC Lilm:uy
`Bibliography Series 4�1 5 Tropical Vegt'.table In.fonn.ation. Service, Taipei: Asian
`
`Vegehabk Research and Dfvefopmtnt Center, reconunended the use of lriadilnefon.
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`3
`
`thiabem.bzole, chlorothalonil and certain ethvlenebis--dithiocarbamates for the control of
`
`soybean rust. 'The protection offered by triadirnefon was inconsistent, in companson to
`
`mancozeb, although it succes;.;foUy prevented yield losses. However, triadimefon required
`
`frequent applicatiom at 10-20 day intervals, starting frorn the fiovv·ering stage in order to
`
`retain its effectiveness. T.hiabendazole ,vas found to be Jess effective than certain ethy1enehis-­
`
`dithiocarbarnates, and further was found effective only when u;.;ed vvith oxycarbox in.
`
`Thiabendazok was also found to be phytotox ic. Ch1orothaloni1 offered equal or worse rust
`
`control vis-i�~vis the other fongicides recoinrnended in this paper.
`
`'The use of ethyknebis-dithiocarbamates such as mancozeb, lind} or rnaneb alone has been
`
`found effective for the control of ;.;oybean rust 'Nhen applied 7 to 21 days apart, provided the
`
`first application was made three weeks after planting and continued as late as tiU the
`
`flowering stage. Moreover, not aU the smdied showed yield increase due to the individual
`
`applications of ethyknebis~dithiocarbamate;.;_
`
`Oxycarboxin ,vas found less effective than ethy1enehis--dithiocarbamates, was found
`
`inconsistent in rnst control and yield protection varied ,vith the particular stm.iy. Oxycarboxin
`
`is also requ.ired to ·be a.pplieri ,;vh_en lesions fjrst appear ancl tl1en at 7--intervals for effecti,ve
`
`control, which i;.; expensive and inconvenient.
`
`Azoxystrohin is another fungicide, which has been recommended for ;.;oybean rust control.
`
`However, it i;.; .kno,vn in the art that a single 1ate application of azoxystrobin doe;.; not control
`
`soybean rust or protect yield los;.;es.
`
`A recent survey by the present applicant found that a limited number of about 8--10
`
`fungicides were approved to be used for the control of soybean rn;.;t, which are;
`
`(A) Conazole type tung1c1des such as myc1obutaniL propiconazole, tetrnconazole and
`
`tebuconazole�
`
`(H) Strobilurin type fungicides such a;.; az.oxystrohin and pyraclostrobin;
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`4
`
`(C) Combinations of conazole and strobilmin type fongicides such as propiconazole +
`
`trilfoxystrobin; and
`
`(D)Ethylenehis--dithiocarbamates such as mancozeh.
`
`Thu;.;, additional fungicides are needed for soybean rust control due to economic reasons as
`
`\vell as for resistance rrn.ma_gement strategies. However, the chojce of fungicides for soybean
`
`i;.; not straightfon.vard.
`
`Soybean is not usually treated ,;vith foliar fungicjdes. Therefore, the choice of a protective
`
`foljar fungicide leaves open the question of its app!icatlon methods or the effect of the
`
`particular selected fongicide on the crop. The pathogen for soybean rnst is usually found on
`
`the Jcn.ver leaves of the plant 1-vhere the lesion mnnbers increases as the inoculum builds up.
`
`As the plant begins to flower, thi;.; inoculurn builds up increases and the infection moves up
`
`the plant as the lovver leaves die off and drop, 'The crop needs protection from flov,u:ring
`
`stage to the pod fiU stage, during 1-vhich the plant canopy is very deme. The dense canopy is
`
`an effective barrier to penetration of fungicides applied over the top of the canopy. Therefore,
`
`foliar fungicides are not preferred during this stage of fungicida1 control, or even the
`
`systemic fungicide;.; that do not move dov,m the plant ;.;ystem present a problem.
`
`US 8044084 discloses a method for controUing harmful fungi by applying a combination of a
`
`strobilmin fungicide with an ethylene modulator. It ,vas found that the ho;.;t p1ants are
`
`damaged to a lesser extent than after the treatment ',vith a custornary fungicide. Specifically,
`
`this pawnt leaches a cornbination of pyradostrobin vv·ith prohexadiorw~Ca in weight rmio of
`
`from 20: J to 0.05: J.
`
`US 20 1 1 /0312493 teache;.; a method for controlling Asian ;.;oyhean rust The method
`
`compri;.;e;.; treating a glyphosate tolerant soybean p1ant propagation material vvith a fungicide
`'
`·1
`se1ected
`
`1pconazoie� epoxycon.azo1e�
`from
`flutriafol,
`
`tebuconazole,
`
`tnt1conazole,
`
`orysastrobin, prothioconazok, fluoxastrobin, azoxystrobin, for;.Hnelpyr, cyproconazok and
`
`subsequently ,vith glyphosme.
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`5
`
`US 2008/0153824 discloses for controlling rust infections in leguminous plants by using
`
`orysastrohin or a mixture of orysastrobin 'vvith azoles, acy1alanines, amine derivatives,
`.
`neterocyc .JC
`j'
`
`.
`
`. -i
`
`ditlu ocarbmates,
`
`compounds,
`
`anilinopyri mi dines,
`
`,·
`
`I
`
`tdcar Jox11moes,
`
`p 1eny pyrro es, cmnamHie;.; am.i ana ogs t ereo
`l
`1
`1
`.
`j h
`t'
`l
`· -1
`
`WO 2012/110 464 djscloses a method for controlling A.sian soybean rust by applying a
`
`succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicide.
`
`There is a need in the art for a fungkidal method of control of soybean nrnt that takes into
`
`account the economics of fungicide application, the timing and number of sprays and lastly,
`
`the choice of the fungicide for an effective control. 'fhese issues present a considerab1e
`
`chaUenge to an agronomist.
`
`Moreover, the single fungicide treatment regimen for Asian Soybean Rust (ASR) has many
`
`drawbacks. Azoxystrobin was one of the first of the Qo inhibitors to be used for the treatment
`
`of soybean rust individually and it provided good control. However, according to FRAC
`
`guidelines, Azoxystrobin should be used more as a preventive fungicide rather than a
`
`curative fungicide. The risk of resistance to Qo inhibitors is also very high. Another
`
`drawback is that even at the lowest labeled rate of use product, Qo inhibitor fungicide still
`
`costs the highest.
`
`Alternatively, DM Inhibitors have shown good efficacy towards ASR, however, recent
`
`findings have suggested that Phakopsora pachyrhizi is capable of developing resistance to
`
`DM inhibitors.
`
`Combinations of Qo inhibitors and DM inhibitors are currently registered in the Americas
`
`have demonstrated 40 to 60% control of ASR. However, the control efficacy mixtures of
`
`DM inhibitors with Qo inhibitors have reduced in the past seasons. Also, there is no great
`
`increase in yield and no decrease in the stress on the plant due to pest pressure.
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`6
`
`Use of SDH inhibitors is also recommended for soybean rust control. However, single
`
`fungicides such as Boscalid offer only a moderate control of ASR.
`
`Dithiocarbamates, and mancozeb in particular, was one of the first fungicides to be used for
`
`the treatment of ASR. Over the years many trials have been conducted on the use of
`
`Mancozeb alone for the treatment of ASR. However, the efficacy of mancozeb alone towards
`
`soybean rust control requires further research.
`
`The present invention aims to overcome the problems in the prior art, namely, the need for a
`
`method of treatment that wi !l not render Phakopsora resistant to actives, improve yield
`
`substantially and at reduced concentrations of actives, as well as reduced costs.
`
`Objects of the invention:
`
`The present invention, described hereinafter, achieves at least one of the following objects of
`
`the invention.
`
`It is an object of the present invention to provide a method to prevent and/or treat
`
`
`
`
`
`Phakopsora pachyrhizi and/or Phakopsora meibomiae infection in a host plant.
`
`
`
`
`
`It is another object of the present invention to provide a method of treating Soybean Rust in a
`
`host plant that boosts the nutrient 1eve1 in the plants and irnproves the quality of the plants.
`
`It is another object of the present invention to provide a method of treating Soybean Rust in a
`
`host plant such that the quantities of fungicides used in the treatment is greatly reduced.
`
`It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for treating soybean rust in a
`
`host plant wherein the fungicides used provides a synergistic control of soybean rust.
`
`Summary of the invention:
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`7
`
`In an aspect, the present invention provides an improved method of treating soybean rust
`
`infection in a host leguminous plant, wherein the improvement comprises treating the plant at
`
`the locus of the infection with a dithiocarbamate fungicide, and concurrently, prior or
`
`subsequently to the dithiocarbamate fungicide, with at least another fungicide selected from a
`
`demethylation inhibitor, quinone outside inhibitor, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor,
`
`quinone inside inhibitor or combinations thereof.
`
`In another aspect, the present invention provides a fungicidal combination for treating
`
`soybean rust infection in a host leguminous plant, wherein the combination comprises a first
`
`dithiocarbamate fungicide, and at least second fungicide selected from a demethylation
`
`inhibitor, quinone outside inhibitor, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor, quinone inside
`
`inhibitor or combinations thereof.
`
`In another aspect, the present invention provides the use of a dithiocarbamate fungicide as a
`
`synergist to improve disease control in a host plant infected by soybean rust when applied
`
`subsequently, pnor or concurrently to at least another fungicide selected from a
`
`demethylation inhibitor, quinone outside inhibitor, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor,
`
`quinone inside inhibitor or combinations thereof.
`
`Detailed Description of the invention:
`
`It has surprisingly been found that the use of a contact protective dithiocarbamate fungicide
`
`along with at least one systemic fungicide effectively penetrates the dense canopy barrier of
`
`the infected leguminous plant while simultaneously not allowing the rust pathogen to move
`
`up the plant foliage. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the contact
`
`protective dithiocarbmate fungicide component of the combination effectively penetrates the
`
`dense plant foliage, while the systemic fungicide component effectively prevents the rust
`
`pathogen from infecting the remaining portion of the plant effectively reducing the
`
`susceptibility of the plant towards the infection. This synergistic complementation was not
`
`seen when either the foliar protective fungicide or the systemic fungicide were individually
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`8
`
`used in isolation, but was observed when the two fungicides were used in conjunction. This
`
`synergistic complementation between the contact preventive dithiocarbamate fungicide and a
`
`systemic fungicide for the treatment and control of Phakopsora species of fungicides was
`
`unexpected and surprising.
`
`Thus, in an aspect, the present invention provides a method for treating soybean rust in a host
`
`leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at the locus of the
`
`infection with at least one multi-site contact fungicide; and concurrently, prior or
`
`subsequently to the multi-site contact fungicide, with at least one systemic fungicide.
`
`The multi-site contact fungicides of the present invention inhibit fungal growth through
`
`multiple sites of action and have contact and preventive activity. In an embodiment, the
`
`multi-site contact fungicide may be selected from copper fungicides, sulfur fungicides,
`
`dithiocarbamate fungicides, phthalimide fungicides, chloronitrile fungicides, sulfamide
`
`fungicides, guanidine fungicides, triazines fungicides and quinone fungicides.
`
`The copper fungicides of the present invention are inorganic compounds containing copper,
`
`typically in the copper (II) oxidation state and are preferably selected from copper
`
`oxychloride, copper sulfate, copper hydroxide and tribasic copper sulfate (Bordeaux
`
`mixture). The sulfur fungicides of the present invention are inorganic chemicals containing
`
`rings or chains of sulfur atoms and is preferably elemental sulfur. The dithiocarbamate
`
`fungicides of the present invention contain a dithiocarbamate molecular moiety and are
`
`selected from amobam, asomate, azithiram, carbamorph, cufraneb, cuprobam, disulfiram,
`
`ferbam, metam, nabam,
`
`tecoram,
`
`thiram, urbacide, ziram, dazomet, etem, milneb,
`
`mancopper, mancozeb, maneb, metiram, polycarbamate, propineb and zineb. The
`
`phthalimide fungicides of the present invention contain a phthalimide molecular moiety and
`
`are selected from folpet, captan and captafol. The chloronitrile fungicide of the present
`
`invention comprises an aromatic ring substituted with chloro- and cyano-substituents and is
`
`preferably chlorothalonil. The sulfamide fungicides of the present invention are preferably
`
`selected from dichlofluanid and tolylfluanid. The guanidine fungicides of the present
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`9
`
`invention are preferably selected from dodine, guazantine and iminoctaadine. The triazine
`
`fungicide of the present invention is preferably anilazine. The quinone fungicide of the
`
`present invention is preferably dithianon.
`
`In an embodiment, the multi-site contact fungicide of the present invention is a
`
`dithiocarbamate fungicide selected from amobam, asomate, azithiram, carbamorph, cufraneb,
`
`cuprobam, disulfiram, ferbam, metam, nabam, tecoram, thiram, urbacide, ziram, dazomet,
`
`etem, milneb, mancopper, mancozeb, maneb, metiram, polycarbamate, propineb and zineb.
`
`Thus, in this aspect, the present invention provides a method for treating soybean rust in a
`
`host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at the locus of the
`
`infection with at least one dithiocarbamate fungicide selected from amobam, asomate,
`
`azithiram, carbamorph, cufraneb, cuprobam, disulfiram, ferbam, metam, nabam, tecoram,
`
`thiram, urbacide, ziram, dazomet, etem, milneb, mancopper, mancozeb, maneb, metiram,
`
`polycarbamate, propineb and zineb; and concurrently, prior or subsequently to the
`
`dithiocarbamate fungicide, with at least one systemic fungicide.
`
`In an embodiment, the dithiocarbamate fungicide is mancozeb.
`
`In an embodiment, the multi-site contact fungicide is a combination of mancozeb and
`
`chlorothalonil.
`
`Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for treating soybean rust
`
`in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at the locus of
`
`the infection with mancozeb; and concurrently, prior or subsequently to mancozeb, with at
`
`least one systemic fungicide.
`
`The term contact fungicide as used herein for the dithiocarbamate fungicides denotes a
`
`fungicide that remains at the site where it is applied but does not travel within the plant.
`
`Typically, these fungicides do not show any post-infection activity.
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`10
`
`In an embodiment, the contact dithiocarbamate fungicide may be applied repeatedly at the
`
`site of the infection at pre-determined time intervals.
`
`The term "systemic fungicide" as used herein shall denote a fungicide that is absorbed into
`
`the plant tissue and possesses at least some amount of an after-infection activity. Preferably,
`
`the systemic fungicide of the present invention is capable of moving freely throughout the
`
`plant. However, the term "systemic fungicide" is intended herein to include the upwardly
`
`systemic fungicide as well as the locally systemic fungicide.
`
`In an embodiment, the systemic fungicide is preferably a quinone outside inhibitor (QoI). In
`
`this embodiment, the quinone outside inhibitor is selected from an imidazolinone fungicide,
`
`an oxazolidinedione fungicide or a strobilurin fungicide.
`
`Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for treating soybean rust
`
`in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at the locus of
`
`the infection with at least one dithiocarbamate fungicide selected from amobam, asomate,
`
`azithiram, carbamorph, cufraneb, cuprobam, disulfiram, ferbam, metam, nabam, tecoram,
`
`thiram, urbacide, ziram, dazomet, etem, milneb, mancopper, mancozeb, maneb, metiram,
`
`polycarbamate, propineb and zineb, or combinations thereof with chlorothalonil; and
`
`concurrently, prior or subsequently to the dithiocarbamate fungicide, with at least one
`
`quinone outside inhibitor.
`
`The QoI inhibitors useful in this embodiment of the present invention effect the inhibition of
`
`complex III: cytochrome bcl (ubiquinol oxidase) at Qo site i.e. cyt b gene.
`
`In one embodiment, the imidazolinone fungicide is fenamidone.
`
`In another embodiment, the oxazolidinedione fungicide is famoxadone.
`
`In another embodiment, the strobilurin fungicide is selected from the group consisting of
`
`azoxystrobin,
`
`mandestrobin,
`
`coumoxystrobin,
`
`enoxastrobin,
`
`flufenoxystrobin,
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`1 1
`
`pyraoxystrobin,
`
`dimoxystrobin,
`
`enestrobin,
`
`fluoxastrobin,
`
`kresoxim-methyl,
`
`metominostrobin,
`
`orysastrobin,
`
`picoxystrobin,
`
`pyrametostrobin,
`
`triclopyricarb,
`
`fenaminstrobin, pyraclostrobin and trifloxystrobin.
`
`In another embodiment, the systemic fungicide of the present invention 1s preferably a
`
`demethylation inhibitor (DMI).
`
`Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for treating soybean rust
`
`in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at the locus of
`
`the infection with at least one dithiocarbamate fungicide selected from amobam, asomate,
`
`azithiram, carbamorph, cufraneb, cuprobam, disulfiram, ferbam, metam, nabam, tecoram,
`
`thiram, urbacide, ziram, dazomet, etem, milneb, mancopper, mancozeb, maneb, metiram,
`
`polycarbamate, propineb and zineb or combinations thereof with chlorothalonil; and
`
`concurrently, prior or subsequently to the dithiocarbamate fungicide, with at least one
`
`demethylation inhibitor.
`
`In this embodiment, the preferred DMI inhibitor is preferably a conazole fungicide selected
`
`from the group consisting of climbazole, clotrimazole, imazalil, oxpoconazole, prochloraz,
`
`prochloraz-manganese, triflumizole, azaconazole, bitertanol, bromuconazole, cyproconazole,
`
`diclobutrazol, difenoconazole, diniconazole, diniconazole-M, epoxiconazole, etaconazole,
`
`fenbuconazole, fluotrimazole,
`
`fluquinconazole, flusilazole, flutriafol,
`
`furconazole,
`
`furconazole-cis, hexaconazole, imibenconazole, ipconazole, metconazole, myclobutanil,
`
`pencoconazole, propiconazole, prothioconazole, quinconazole, simeconazole, tebuconazole,
`
`tetraconazole,
`
`triadimefon,
`
`triadimenol,
`
`triticonazole, uniconazole, perfurazoate and
`
`uniconazole-P.
`
`In another embodiment, the preferred DMI inhibitor is preferably selected from triflurnizole,
`
`triforine, pyridinitrile, pyrifenox, fenarimol, nuarimol and triarimol.
`
`In another embodiment, the systemic fungicide of the present invention is a combination of at
`
`least one quinone outside inhibitor and at least demethylation inhibitor.
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`12
`
`Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for treating soybean rust
`
`in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at the locus of
`
`the infection with at least one dithiocarbamate fungicide selected from amobam, asomate,
`
`azithiram, carbamorph, cufraneb, cuprobam, disulfiram, ferbam, metam, nabam, tecoram,
`
`thiram, urbacide, ziram, dazomet, etem, milneb, mancopper, mancozeb, maneb, metiram,
`
`polycarbamate, propineb and zineb; and concurrently, prior or subsequently to the
`
`dithiocarbamate fungicide, with at least one quinone outside inhibitor and at least one
`
`demethylation inhibitor.
`
`In an embodiment, the preferred quinone outside inhibitor is a strobilurin fungicide and the
`
`preferred demethylation inhibitor is a conazole fungicide. In this embodiment, the preferred
`
`dithiocarbamate is selected from the group consisting of thiram, ziram, mancozeb, maneb,
`
`metiram, propineb and zineb.
`
`Therefore, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for treating soybean
`
`rust in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at the locus
`
`of the infection with at least one dithiocarbamate fungicide selected from thiram, ziram,
`
`mancozeb, maneb, metiram, propineb and zineb or combinations thereof with chlorothalonil;
`
`and concurrently, prior or subsequently to the dithiocarbamate fungicide, with at least one
`
`strobilurin fungicide and at least one conazole fungicide.
`
`In an embodiment, the preferred dithiocarbamate is mancozeb. In this embodiment, the
`
`preferred strobilurin fungicide is selected from trifloxystrobin, picoxystrobin, azoxystrobin or
`
`pyraclostrobin, while the preferred conazole fungicide is selected from prothioconazole,
`
`tebuconazole, cyproconazole, epoxiconazole, metconazole and tebuconazole.
`
`Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for treating soybean rust
`
`in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at the locus of
`
`the infection with mancozeb or combinations thereof with chlorothalonil; and concurrently,
`
`prior or subsequently to mancozeb, with at least one strobilurin fungicide selected from
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`13
`
`trifloxystrobin, picoxystrobin, azoxystrobin or pyraclostrobin and at least one conazole
`
`fungicide selected from prothioconazole, tebuconazole, cyproconazole, epoxiconazole,
`
`metconazole and tebuconazole.
`
`In one embodiment, the preferred strobilurin is trifloxystrobin and the preferred conazole is
`
`prothioconazole. Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for
`
`treating soybean rust in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the
`
`plant at the locus of the infection with mancozeb; and concurrently, prior or subsequently to
`
`mancozeb, with trifloxystrobin and with prothioconazole.
`
`In one embodiment, the preferred strobilurin is picoxystrobin and the preferred conazole is
`
`tebuconazole. Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for treating
`
`soybean rust in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at
`
`the locus of the infection with mancozeb; and concurrently, prior or subsequently to
`
`mancozeb, with picoxystrobin and with tebuconazole.
`
`In one embodiment, the preferred strobilurin is picoxystrobin and the preferred conazole is
`
`cyproconazole. Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for
`
`treating soybean rust in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the
`
`plant at the locus of the infection with mancozeb; and concurrently, prior or subsequently to
`
`mancozeb, with picoxystrobin and with cyproconazole.
`
`In one embodiment, the preferred strobilurin is azoxystrobin and the preferred conazole is
`
`cyproconazole. Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for
`
`treating soybean rust in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the
`
`plant at the locus of the infection with mancozeb; and concurrently, prior or subsequently to
`
`mancozeb, with azoxystrobin and with cyproconazole.
`
`In one embodiment, the preferred strobilurin is pyraclostrobin and the preferred conazole is
`
`epoxiconazole. Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for
`
`treating soybean rust in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the
`
`

`

`WO 2015/079334
`
`PCT /IB2014/064891
`
`14
`
`plant at the locus of the infection with mancozeb; and concurrently, prior or subsequently to
`
`mancozeb, with pyraclostrobin and with epoxiconazole.
`
`In one embodiment, the preferred strobilurin is pyraclostrobin and the preferred conazole is
`
`tebuconazole. Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for treating
`
`soybean rust in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at
`
`the locus of the infection with mancozeb; and concurrently, prior or subsequently to
`
`mancozeb, with pyraclostrobin and with tebuconazole.
`
`In one embodiment, the preferred strobilurin is pyraclostrobin and the preferred conazole is
`
`metconazole. Thus, in this embodiment, the present invention provides a method for treating
`
`soybean rust in a host leguminous plant, wherein the method comprises treating the plant at
`
`the locus of the infection with mancozeb; and concurrently, prior or subsequently to
`
`mancozeb, with pyraclostrobin and with metconazole.
`
`In another embodiment, the preferred strobilurin is trifloxystrobin and the preferred conazole
`
`is selected from cyproconazole, propiconazole or tebuconazole. Thus, in this embodiment,
`
`the present invention provides a method for treating soybean rust in a host leguminous plant,
`
`wherein the method comprises treating the plant at the locus of the infection with mancozeb;
`
`and

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket