throbber
@
`
`Revista Agrarian
`ISSN: 1984-2538
`
`Effects of cyproconazole, azoxystrobin and mineral oil on soybean leaf anatomy
`
`Ef eitos de ciproconazole, azoxistrobina e 6leo mineral sob re a anatomia Jo liar da soja
`
`Paula Caroline Silva Moura 1, Maria Bernadete Gom;alves Martins2, Raphael Gon~alves Martins 1,
`Isabella Romitelli2, Paulo Roberto de Camargo e Castro1
`
`1Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP), Escola Superior de Ag,icultura "Luiz de Queiroz" (ESALQ), Av. Padua
`Dias, 11 - Piracicaba - SP, CEP 134 18-900, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. E-mail: prcastro@usp.br
`2lJnivers idade Rstadual Paulist.a (l JNRSP), Campus Rxperime ntal do I ,it.oral Pa ulista, Sao Vicente, SP, Rrazil
`
`Recebido e m: 18/05/2012
`
`Aceito em: 26/11/201 2
`
`Abstract. A fungicide composed of a triazole (cyproconazole), a strobiluri n (azoxystrobin) and a mineral oil
`(nimbus) is used for disease control, Asian Rust ma inly, currently considered one of the major soybean
`diseases in Brazil. With the purpose of studying the effect of the fungicide and its constituents on
`histological characte1i stics of soybean (Glycine max cv. Pintado) leaves, the fungicides plus mineral oil,
`cyproconazole, azoxystrobin plus mineral oil and j ust mineral oil, were applied at Rl stage (anthesis), R3
`and R5 stages. Fourteen days after the last application, central leaflet of each trifoliate leaf were harvested
`from fi ve plants. Leaf anatomy variables were measured in four leaves collected in each of fi ve plants per
`treatme nt. Histological analysis showed that the fungicide plus mineral oil increased leaf blade thickness,
`midrib, xylem, phloem and the width of the midrib. Azoxystrobin plus mineral oil increased the thickness of
`midrib, xylem, phloem and che width of rhe midrib. Cyproconazole increased the thickness of xylem and
`phloem. Finally, mineral oil reduced the thickness of leaf blade and midrib.
`
`Keywords. Asian rust, fungi cide, leaf histology
`
`Resumo. Um fun gicida composto por um triazol (ciproconazol), uma estrobilurina (azoxistrobina) e um oleo
`mineral (nimbus) te rn sido utilizado para controle de doern;:as, p1incipalmente ferrugem asiatica, atualmente
`considerada uma das principais doern;:as da soja no Brasil. Com o o bjetivo de estudar o efeito do fungicida e
`seus constituintes sobre as caracten sticas histologicas das folhas de soja (Glycine max cv. Pintado),
`fungicida + oleo mineral, ciproconazol, azoxystrobina + oleo mineral e apenas oleo mineral, foram aplicados
`nos estadios RI (antese), R 3 e R5. Quatorze dias apos a ultima aphcac;:ao, as porc;:oes centrais de cada folha
`trifo liolada foram colhidas de cinco plantas. A anatomia de variaveis foliares foram determinadas em quatro
`folhas coletadas e m cada uma das cinco plantas por tratamento. Analise histologica mostrou que o fungicida
`+ oleo mineral, aume ntou a espessura da lamina foliar, nervura central, xilema, fl oema e largura da nervura
`central. Azoxistrobina + oleo mineral, aumentou a espessura da nervura central, tloema, xilema, e largura da
`nervura central. Ciproconazol aumentou a espessura do xilema e do tloema. Finalmente, oleo mineral
`reduziu a espessura da lamina foliar e nervura central.
`
`Palavras-chave. Ferrugem asiatica, fungicida, histologia foliar
`
`Introduction
`In the 2010/11 Brazilian crops of soybean
`(Glycine max (L.) Menill) amounted 75,0 millio n
`hectares, producing 60.1 million tons with 3106 kg
`ha-1 of average productivity
`(Conab, 20 11) .
`affected by
`However, production has been
`aggravated fungal diseases, causing considerable
`damage to growers, to breeding programs and
`therefore to the country (Sediyama et al., 2005) . In
`Brazil, 34 types of fungal diseases in soybean have
`been identified (Embrapa, 2008). Among the major
`
`rust caused by
`the Asian soybean
`diseases,
`Phakopsora pachyrhizi, which has provoked great
`concerns among growers and technicians, mainly
`after the 2002/03 crop, when spread to all producing
`regions, posing as a threat 10 the culture due to
`damage caused and to the increased production costs
`generated for its control. The most widespread and
`effective method still used in controlling soybean
`rust is the use of fungicides. Among the fungicides
`most commonly used are mixtures of diffe rent
`groups of strobilurins with triazoles, which have
`
`Moura et al. (2013)- Dourados, v.6, n.20, p.154-160, 2013
`
`154
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1017
`Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`@
`
`Revista Agrarian
`ISSN: 1984-2538
`
`controlling
`
`the disease
`
`in
`
`effective
`proven
`(Embrapa, 2008).
`Characteristic effects of triazole application in
`plants include reduction in height, increase in stem
`diameter and compactness of the plant canopy. The
`intensity of these changes depends on the triazole,
`the plant specie and age, the dose and method of
`application of the triazole. Plants
`treated with
`triazole have smaller, but thicker leaves and thicker
`cuticle. The increase in leaf thickness has heen
`coffelated with the increase in the diameter of cells
`and/or with the presence of additional cell layers
`(Gao et al., 1988).
`The sectional area of chloroplasts of leaves
`treated with triazoles, under a microscope and a
`spectrophotometer, is significantly larger than that
`of untreated leaves. In maize, a treatment with
`paclobutrazole did not affect
`the number of
`chloroplasts, but
`increased
`the
`amount of
`chlorophyll per chloroplast. Both paclobutrazole and
`uniconazole are used as growth retardants on fruit
`trees, ornamental plants and crops. The uniconazole
`was considered more active than paclobmrazole in
`reducing plant height, however, in soybeans, both
`compounds showed similar effects on plant stunting.
`Retardants increased the chlorophyll content and
`leaf thickness in soybeans but had no effect on these
`parameters in maize. The increase in soybean leaf
`thickness was due, p1imarily, to an increase in the
`thickness of palisade layer cells (Barnes et al ., 1989)
`ln many species, treatment with tJiazole leads
`inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis, delaying
`to
`senescence and leaf abscission (Fletcher et al.,
`2000).
`Several experiments have been carried out to
`examine the physiological effects of strobilurin on
`wheat, barley and soybeans,
`in which
`these
`fungicides have
`reduced
`the
`rate of water
`conductance through the stomata closure in the three
`crops. This
`resulted
`in
`lower
`rates of net
`photosynthesis, transpiration and intercellular CO2.
`The
`water
`use
`efficiency
`(net
`photosynthesis/transpiration ratio) in well-irrigated
`plants
`is often
`improved by
`treatment with
`strobilurin. This is because these fungicides reduce
`more transpiration than photosynthesis; however, in
`plants under water deficit, water efficiency is not
`improved and
`is occasionally
`reduced after
`treatment with strobilurin. Strobilmin
`reduces
`photosynthesis, regardless of the effect on stomata.
`The effects of strobilurin are temporary, but the
`recovery speed of photosynthetic parameters after
`the application of these fungicides depends on
`
`stJ·obilurin group. The effects of pyraclostrobin
`persist for at least 14 days after spraying (Nason et
`al., 2004).
`Mineral oils, such as the nimbus, can exert
`some control over pests, but are also widely used as
`spreader-stickers. The purpose of this study was to
`evaluate the effect of a fungicide and its constituents
`on
`the anatomical characteristics of leaves of
`soybean 'Pintado' to know more about the action of
`the agrochemica I.
`
`Material and Methods
`The soybean plants were cultivated under
`greenhouse conditions,
`irrigated near
`to
`field
`capacity and treated with the fungicide and the vase
`substract (sand, organic matter and soil at the
`relation
`2:1 :2)
`received
`the
`application of
`conventional mineral salts.
`The treatments were: control (non-treated
`plants at anthesis stage), the fungicide (200 g L-1
`-
`20% m/v azoxystrobin + 80 g L-' - 8% rn/v
`cyproconazole + 428 g L-1 mineral oil),
`azoxystrobin (200 g L-1
`- 20% rn/v + 428 g L-'
`nimbus - mineral oil), cyproconazole (80 g L- ' - 8%
`rn/v) and mineral oil (428 g L·' of mineral oil) were
`applied three times: at R I stage (anthesis), R3 and
`R5 stages. Fourteen days after the last application,
`four samples of centJ·al leaflet of each trifoliate leaf
`were harvested from five plants.
`For the anatomical study, four central leaflets
`were used (blade and midrib) of the third node of
`five adult individuals randomly chosen in each five
`treatments, collected at the end of the reproductive
`stage (R6).
`in FAA 70 (1: 1:8
`Samples were fixed
`formaldehyde, glacial acetic acid and ethyl alcohol
`70%) for 24 hours, dehydrated in a graded ethanol
`series and embedded in hydroxyl-ethyl methacrylate
`(Leica Historesin). Serial sections were cut on a
`rotary microtome (5 - JO µ m thick), stained with l %
`toluidine blue with 1 % of sodium borate in 100 mL
`of distilled water (Gerrits, 1991 ).
`Twenty measurements per treatment were
`taken of the following leaf anatomical variables:
`thickness of leaf blade. thickness of the phloem and
`xylem and thickness and width of the midrib.
`Photomicrographs were taken with a Leica®
`. DMLB photomicroscope equipped with a Leica®
`DC 300F camera. Data on leaf histological analysis
`were subject
`to variance analysis and, when
`significant, the means were compared using the
`Tukey lest at 5% probability.
`
`Moura et al. (2013)- Dourados, v.6, n.20, p.154-160, 2013
`
`155
`
`

`

`@
`
`Revista Agrarian
`ISSN: 1984-2538
`
`Results and Discussion
`The mesophyll is dorsiventral type, having
`two layers of palisade cells (Figure 1 ), characte1istic
`of the Phaseolae tribe (Lackey, 1978). The spongy
`parenchyma is composed of cells of various shapes
`and sizes with intercellular spaces quite pronounced.
`Lateral
`vascular bundles
`surrounded
`by
`a
`parenchymatous sheath of isodiametric cells, with
`
`-SO um
`
`extensions to both faces of leaf surface, were also
`observed along the mesophyll (Figure J ) .
`Below the innermost layer of the palisade,
`there are cells with hmizontal orientation, when
`compared with others of mesophyll ceIJs, called
`(Figure 1 ). These cells
`paraveinal mesophyll
`facilitate horizontal translocation of photosynthesis
`products (Fisher, 1967).
`
`A
`
`B
`
`Figure 1. Cross sections of central leaflet blade of Glycine max 'Pintado' . (A) non-treated (control). (B)
`- 8% m/v cyproconazole + 428 g L-1 nimbus -
`fungicide (200 g L-1
`- 20% m/v azoxystrobin + 80 g L- 1
`mineral oil). ep = epidermis; fv = vascular bundle; mpn: paraveinal mesophyll; pl = spongy parenchyma; pp
`= palisade parenchyma.
`
`By comparing the cross sections of the leaf of
`control soybean 'Pintado' (Figure. I A and 3A) with
`mesophyll sections of that treated with fungicide +
`mineral oil (Fig. l B) and with cyproconazole (Fig.
`3B), it is verified that the treatments caused an
`increase on
`the structure dimensions of
`the
`mesophyll The herbicide t1idiphane did affect the
`growth and structure of soybean leaf tissue too
`(Dionigini & Dekker,
`1990). The
`triazole
`
`triadimefon increased the thickness of leaf in wheat
`and barley (Sopher et al., 1999; Asarni et al., 2000).
`The mid,ib vascular system is composed of a
`collateral bundle in the form of an abaxial arc and
`one or two smaller bundles embedded in the ground
`tissue (Figure 2A). Sclerenchyma fibers external to
`phloem and coIJenchyma deposited in the adaxial
`arc and the abaxial of midrib, are observed (Figure
`2A)_
`
`Moura et al. (2013)- Dourados, v.6, n.20, p.154-160, 2013
`
`156
`
`

`

`@
`
`Revista Agrarian
`ISSN: 1984-2538
`
`Figure 2. Cross sections of central leaflet midrib of Glycine max 'Pintado'. (A) non-treated (control). (B)
`Fungicide (200 g L-1
`- 20% m/v azoxystrobin + 80 g L-1
`- 8% m/v cyproconazole + 428 g L-1 nimbus -
`mineral oil). X = xylem; F = phloem. The ground parenchyrna has more cell layers in treated leaflets than in
`the control.
`
`-SO um
`
`A
`
`.. _ .... .u. .... ~
`
`B
`
`Figure 3. Cross sections of central leaflet blade of Glycine max ' Pintado' . (A) non-treated (control). (B)
`cyproconazole (80 g L- 1
`- 8% m/v). ep = epidermis; fv = vascular bundle; mpn: paraveinal mesophyll; pl =
`spongy parenchyma; pp = palisade parenchyma.
`
`Moura et al. (2013)- Dourados, v.6, n.20, p.154-160, 2013
`
`157
`
`

`

`@
`
`Revista Agrarian
`ISSN: 1984-2538
`
`When comparing the cross sections of the
`midrib of the control soybean 'Pintado' (Figure. 2A
`and 4A) with midrib sections from leaflets treated
`with fungicide + mineral oil (Fig. 2B) and with
`cyproconazole (Figure 4B), it is observed that the
`treatments
`increased
`
`tissue constituents of the -
`
`tridiphane
`midrib. Soybean leaves treated with
`presented parenchyma cells (Dionigini & Dekker,
`1990), but treated unifoliate midrib tissue appeared
`similar to untreated midrib tissue at both sampling
`points (Dionigini & Dekker, 1990) .
`
`A
`
`Figure 4. Cross sections of central leaflet midrib of Glycine max 'Pintado'. (A) non-treated (control). (8 ).
`- 8% m/v). X = xylem; F = ph]oem.
`cyproconazole (80 g L- 1
`
`Fungicide + mineral oil increased leaf blade
`thickness, whiJe the mineral oil reduced it.The
`midrib thickness was increased in treatments with
`fungicide + mineral oil and azoxystrobin + mineral
`oil, and it was reduced in plants treated with mineral
`oil. Treatments with fungicide + mineral oil and
`with azoxystrobin + mineral oil increased the midrib
`width of soybean leaves (Table 1).
`rnineraJ oil,
`Application of fungicide +
`azoxystrobin + mineral oil and cyproconazole
`increased
`the xylem
`thickness, whereas
`the
`fungicide + mineral oil, azoxystrobin + mineral oil
`and cyproconazole increased the phloem thickness
`(Table I ). In Amophophallus campanulatus plants,
`the thickness of leaf increased gradually in plants
`treated with triadimefon than in the control plants
`(Gopi et al., 2008). Triazole treatments increased the
`
`number of cells per unit area in the palisade and
`spongy layer of the leaf (Gopi et al., 2008).
`Increased mesophyll thickness, chloroplast size and
`level were reported in wheat with triadimefon
`treatment (Gao et al., 1988).
`A secondary factor associated with systemic
`fungicides
`is possible hormonal causes your
`application
`in
`plants,
`influenci11g
`various
`physiological processes. Th.is
`influence became
`known as 'tonic effect' and visually characterized by
`a greater vigor and leafiness of the plant and a shade
`darker green leaves. However, the exact mechanism
`that generates this fact is still unknown, but it is
`attributed to a possible hormonal effect, which
`indirectly
`influences growth by increasing
`the
`absorption of water and nutrients (Almeida &
`Matiello, 2000). After absorption and translocation
`
`Moura et al. (2013)- Dourados, v.6, n.20, p.154-160, 2013
`
`158
`
`

`

`@
`
`Revista Agrarian
`ISS
`: 1984-2538
`
`through the xylem, the active ingredient settles on
`leaves and prolongs the photosynthetic activity. This
`fact is due to hormonal concentration that it has.
`According to Castro (2006), the molecules of the
`active hormonal action act in two ways. The first
`influences
`in order to activate cell membrane
`proteins enabling greater ionic transport increasing
`
`the mineral nutTition of the plant. The second acts in
`increased enzyme activity in increase of p1imary and
`secondary metabolism, increased synthesis of amino
`acid precursors for the synthesis of new proteins and
`plant hormones. These facts justify the increased
`thickness of the leaf soybean leaves treated with
`fungi cides.
`
`NE (µm)
`722.81 C
`1023.l 8 a
`774.99 C
`
`168.32 b
`
`885 .86 b
`
`Table 1. Effect of fu ngicide and its constituents on histologi cal characte1istics of 'Pintado' soybean leaves:
`hlarle th ickness (RT) mirlrih thi ckness ( E), mirltih wirlth ( W), xylem thickness (XT ) and phloem
`thickness (PT). Means of 20 replications.
`TREATME TS
`BT (µm )
`Control
`169.60 b*
`Fungicide + Mineral oil
`253.98 a
`Cyproconazole
`177. l 7 b
`Azoxystrobin +
`Mineral oil
`45 .82 C
`125.29 C
`530.76 d
`602.88 d
`133.69 C
`Mineral Oil
`134.85 **
`94.09 **
`67.39 **
`55.4 1 **
`46.49 **
`F (treatment)
`V . C. (%)
`17.22
`11.50
`12.56
`9.21
`9.46
`* Simi lar letters in the columns indicate that there was no difference between the means compared in the
`Tukey test at 5% of probability.
`** Significant by tbe 1-<" test at l % of probability.
`
`NW (µm)
`601.69 cd
`854.29 a
`630.66 C
`
`755.33 b
`
`XT (µ m)
`126.78 C
`186.67 a
`148.37 b
`
`182.44 a
`
`PT (µm)
`51.63 C
`100.08 a
`66.69 b
`
`75. 16 b
`
`Conclusion
`The fungicide and its constituents applied on
`soybean 'Pintado' increased tissue components of
`the leaf mesophyll and midrib, while the mineral oil
`decreased tissues of these leaf structures.
`
`Acnowledgements
`The authors gratefully acknowledge Beatriz
`Appezz.ato-da-Gl6ria
`and Wi llian Rodrigues
`Macedo for their help with the preparation of this
`manusctipt and for the lab disponibility.
`
`References
`
`ALMEIDA, S.R. ; MATIELLO, J.B . Efeito de
`fungicidas cupricos e sistemicos e sua associac;:ao
`para o controle de doern;:as no cafeeiro e sua ac;:ao
`sobre o desenvolvimento do sistema radicular e a
`prazo. In:
`26° Congresso
`produc;:ao
`a medio
`Brasileiro de Pesquisas Cafeeiras. Marflia - SP,
`2000. Ri o de Janeiro, MAAPA/PROCAFE, p. 48-
`50 2000.
`
`ASAMI, T .; M[N Y.K.:
`AGATA.
`Y AMAGISHI, K. T AKATSUTO, S. FUJIOKA S.
`.; YAMAGUCHI, I. · YOSHIDA,
`MUROFUS HI
`S. Characterization of brassinozole, a triazo le - type
`inhi bitor. Plant
`brassinosteroid, a biosynthesis
`Physiology, v. 123, p. 93- JO0, 2000.
`
`BAR ES, A.M.; WALSER, R.H. ; DA VIS, T.D.
`Anatomy of Zea mays and Glycine max seedlings
`treated with
`triazole, plant growth
`regul ator.
`Biology Plant, v. 31 , p.370-375, 1989.
`
`P.R.C. Agroqufmicos de controle
`CASTRO
`na
`agricultura
`tropical. Piracicaba,
`hormonal
`ESALQ, Divisao de Biblioteca e Documentac;:ao, 46
`p. (Se,ie Produtor Rural, 32) 2006.
`
`CO AB. Acompanhamento da safra 2010/2011 .
`Decimo terceiro levantamento - agosto de 201 1.
`
`DIO IG rNI C.P.; DE KKER, J.H. Effects of
`tridiphane on growth and structure of oybeans leaf
`tissue. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
`v.37, p.287-292, 1990.
`
`EMBRAPA. Tecnologia de prodm;ao de soja -
`regiao Central do Brasil 2009 e 2010. Lonchina:
`Ernbrapa Soja. 2008 . 262 p. (Sistemas de ProdU<;:ao,
`13).
`
`FISHER, D.B. An unusual layer of cells in the
`mesophyll of soybean leaf. Botanical Gazette, v.
`128, p. 2 15-218 1967.
`
`FLETCHER, R. A. ; GILLEY, A. ; S KLA,
`DA VIS, T. D. T1iazo]es as plant growth regulators
`
`Moura et al. (2013)- Dourados, v.6, n.20, p.154-J 60, 2013
`
`159
`
`

`

`@
`
`Revista Agrarian
`ISSN: 1984-2538
`
`and stress protectants. Horticulture Review, v. 24,
`p. 55-1 38, 2000.
`
`GAO, J.; HOFSTRA, G.; FLETCHER, R.A.
`Anatomical changes induced by triazoles in wheat
`seedlings. Canadian Journal of Botany, v. 66, p.
`1178-1 185, 1988.
`
`GERRITS, P.O. The application of glycol
`metacrylate
`in
`histotechnology:
`some
`fundamental principles. Groningen: Department of
`Anatomy and Embriology, 1991, p. 239.
`
`GOPI, R. ; CHERUTH, A.J.; RAJARAM, P. Leaf
`anatomical
`responses
`of
`Amorphophallus
`campanulatus to triazoles fungicides. Eurasian
`Journal of Biosciences, v. 2, p. 46-52, 2008.
`
`LACKEY, J.A. Leaf anatomy of Phaseolae
`(Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) and is relation to
`taxonomy. Botanical Gazette, v. 139, p 436-446,
`1978.
`
`NASON, M. Strobirulin fungicides alter plant
`metabolism. Syngenta Jealott's Dill lnteroatinal
`Research Center, 2004, p.22.
`
`SEDIY AMA, T. ; TEIXEIRA, R.C.; REIS, M.S.
`Melhoramento de soja. In: BOREM, A. (Ed.).
`Melhoramento de especies cultivadas. Yi<;:osa:
`Universidade Federal de Yi<;:osa, 2005, p. 553-602.
`
`SOPHER, RC.; KROL, M.; HUNER, N.P.A.;
`FLETCHER, R.A. Chloroplastic changes associated
`with paclobutrazol
`induced stress protection in
`maize seedling. Canadian Journal of Botany, v.
`77, p. 1-12, 1999.
`
`Moura et al. (2013)- Dourados, v.6, n.20, p.154-160, 2013
`
`160
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket