throbber
From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Guerra, Kenneth <Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com>
`Monday, January 8, 2024 11:00 AM
`Herbert, Toni-Junell
`Bucca, Daniel; Carson, Charles C.; Klecyngier, David M.; Rick, Michelle; Mehta, Rakesh;
`Feldstein, Mark; Gupta, Raj; UPL-PGR-FINNEGAN
`RE: RE:PGR2023-00017
`
`[External Email: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.]
`
`Hi Toni,
`
`We were unable to respond to your Friday email by COB the same day due to UPL time zone
`considerations. Based on the information you provided, UPL will oppose leave by Syngenta to file its
`proposed motion for additional discovery. We are available for a conference call with the Board on
`January 11 from 10 am to 12 pm and 2 pm to 7 pm.
`
`We also note that your email failed to include UPL’s designated service email address and all counsel of
`record. We have added them to this reply.
`
`Best,
`Ken
`
`Kenneth S. Guerra
`Associate
`Pronouns: He, Him, His
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001-4413
`+1 202 408 4124 | mobile +1 219 576 4160 | Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com | www.finnegan.com
`
`From: Herbert, Toni-Junell <therbert@bakerlaw.com>
`Sent: Friday, January 5, 2024 11:40 AM
`To: Feldstein, Mark <mark.feldstein@finnegan.com>; Guerra, Kenneth
`<Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com>; Mehta, Rakesh <rmehta@bakerlaw.com>
`Cc: Bucca, Daniel <dbucca@bakerlaw.com>; Carson, Charles C. <ccarson@bakerlaw.com>; Klecyngier,
`David M. <dklecyngier@bakerlaw.com>; EXT-Mrick@bakerlaw.com <Mrick@bakerlaw.com>
`Subject: RE:PGR2023-00017
`
`Dear Counsel,
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1045
`Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`

`

`Please advise whether you would oppose a motion by Petitioner to seek: (1) the underlying data and
`materials related to the examples in the patent at issue (the ‘727 patent) or, in the alternative that the
`underlying data and materials cannot be found; (2) a deposition of inventor Rajju Devidas Shroff,
`resident in India where the experiments for the examples took place.
`
`Please also provide multiple times you are available next week for a conference call with the Board. We
`ask that you provide your availability no later than the close of business today.
`
`Kind Regards,
`Toni
`
`Toni Herbert
`Partner
`
`
`Washington Square
`1050 Connecticut Ave N.W. | Suite 1100
`Washington, DC 20036-5403
`T +1.202.861.1578
`
`therbert@bakerlaw.com
`bakerlaw.com
`
`This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is
`addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
`confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended
`recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying
`or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited.
`If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately
`by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
`
`Any tax advice in this email is for information purposes only. The content
`of this email is limited to the matters specifically addressed herein
`and may not contain a full description of all relevant facts or a
`complete analysis of all relevant issues or authorities.
`
`Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of
`inaccuracies as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
`destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore,
`we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are
`present in this email, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result
`of e-mail transmission.
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please advise
`the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please advise
`the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`

`

`Guerra, Kenneth <Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com>
`Tuesday, January 2, 2024 1:08 PM
`Herbert, Toni-Junell
`Carson, Charles C.; Klecyngier, David M.; Bucca, Daniel; Rick, Michelle; Feldstein,
`Mark; Gupta, Raj; UPL-PGR-FINNEGAN
`RE: Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Toni,
`
`As we noted from the start, you have continuously misrepresented Dr. Jacobsen’s declaration. To be
`clear, we disagree that his opinions rely on testing referenced in the ’727 patent. You have further
`failed to provide legal and factual bases for any of your proposed discovery fishing expeditions. Indeed,
`it is not even clear from your evolving demands what discovery Syngenta now seeks. What is clear,
`however, is that the information sought is unlike the additional discovery of Syngenta’s testing ordered
`by the Board, which you directed and relied upon specifically for the purposes of this proceeding,
`intentionally withheld, and misrepresented as “not helpful to Patent Owner” (EX2019, 10:13-14).
`
`Accordingly, while you can inform the Board that we are available on January 3, 2023 from 2-4 pm and
`January 4, 2023 from 10 am to 1 pm, please advise them that it remains Patent Owner’s position that
`there is no dispute ripe for their consideration. Likewise, to the extent you have any other
`information—factual or legal—in support of your extraordinary additional discovery, please fully advise
`us today rather than sandbagging us before the Board.
`
`Best,
`Ken
`
`Kenneth S. Guerra
`Associate
`Pronouns: He, Him, His
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001-4413
`+1 202 408 4124 | mobile +1 219 576 4160 | Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com | www.finnegan.com
`
`From: Herbert, Toni-Junell <therbert@bakerlaw.com>
`Sent: Friday, December 29, 2023 4:52 PM
`To: Guerra, Kenneth <Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com>; Feldstein, Mark
`<mark.feldstein@finnegan.com>; Gupta, Raj <Raj.Gupta@finnegan.com>; UPL-PGR-FINNEGAN <UPL-
`PGR-FINNEGAN@finnegan.com>
`Cc: Carson, Charles C. <ccarson@bakerlaw.com>; Klecyngier, David M. <dklecyngier@bakerlaw.com>;
`Bucca, Daniel <dbucca@bakerlaw.com>; EXT-Mrick@bakerlaw.com <Mrick@bakerlaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`

`

`EXTERNAL Email:
`
`Ken,
`
`We note that you do not dispute that Dr. Jacobsen relied in his declaration on the testing referenced in the ‘727
`patent. As such we are entitled to all data, protocols, assessments, etc. relating to that testing as more specifically
`identified in our email dated Dec. 13. We further understand that you have investigated and determined that
`none of the identified data or other information exists. This is surprising given the discussion of the testing in the ‘
`patent, UPL’s reliance upon it during prosecution as described in our petition, and Dr. Jacobsen’s reliance upon it in
`his declaration. Your representation that no documentation exists only underscores the need to depose the ‘727
`inventor regarding the testing and to determine, for example, whether the disclosed testing was actually
`performed and the underlying documentation discarded or lost.
`
`Please give your availability for a call with the Board between January 3-5, 2024.
`
`Kind regards,
`Toni
`
`Toni Herbert
`Partner
`
`
`Washington Square
`1050 Connecticut Ave N.W. | Suite 1100
`Washington, DC 20036-5403
`T +1.202.861.1578
`
`therbert@bakerlaw.com
`bakerlaw.com
`
`From: Guerra, Kenneth <Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 6:06 PM
`To: Herbert, Toni-Junell <therbert@bakerlaw.com>
`Cc: Bucca, Daniel <dbucca@bakerlaw.com>; Klecyngier, David M. <dklecyngier@bakerlaw.com>; Carson,
`Charles C. <ccarson@bakerlaw.com>; Rick, Michelle <MRick@bakerlaw.com>; Feldstein, Mark
`<mark.feldstein@finnegan.com>; Gupta, Raj <Raj.Gupta@finnegan.com>; UPL-PGR-FINNEGAN <UPL-
`PGR-FINNEGAN@finnegan.com>
`Subject: RE: Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`Hi Toni,
`
`Syngenta has provided neither factual nor legal bases to justify any of its now multiple requests for
`additional discovery. Your continued fishing also suggests that you may be trying to fabricate a dispute
`to raise with the Board.
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`

`

`Nevertheless, as previously explained, UPL investigated and was unable to locate data relating to trials
`described in the ’727 patent beyond those reported therein. UPL will also not agree to the deposition of
`Mr. Rajju Devidas Shroff.
`
`Best,
`Ken
`
`Kenneth S. Guerra
`Associate
`Pronouns: He, Him, His
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001-4413
`+1 202 408 4124 | mobile +1 219 576 4160 | Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com | www.finnegan.com
`
`From: Herbert, Toni-Junell <therbert@bakerlaw.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2023 12:02 PM
`To: Feldstein, Mark <mark.feldstein@finnegan.com>; Guerra, Kenneth
`<Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com>; Gupta, Raj <Raj.Gupta@finnegan.com>; UPL-PGR-FINNEGAN <UPL-
`PGR-FINNEGAN@finnegan.com>
`Cc: Bucca, Daniel <dbucca@bakerlaw.com>; Klecyngier, David M. <dklecyngier@bakerlaw.com>; Carson,
`Charles C. <ccarson@bakerlaw.com>; EXT-Mrick@bakerlaw.com <Mrick@bakerlaw.com>
`Subject: Re: Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`EXTERNAL Email:
`
`Counsel,
`
`Further to our email below, we ask that you respond to us by the close of business Wednesday
`(December 27th) about availability of underlying data and whether you will voluntarily make Rajju
`Devidas Shroff available for a deposition.
`Kind Regards,
`Toni
`
`Toni Herbert
`Partner
`
`
`Washington Square
`1050 Connecticut Ave N.W. | Suite 1100
`Washington, DC 20036-5403
`T +1.202.861.1578
`
`therbert@bakerlaw.com
`bakerlaw.com
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`

`

`From: Herbert, Toni-Junell
`Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2023 4:09 PM
`To: Guerra, Kenneth <Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com>; Bucca, Daniel <dbucca@bakerlaw.com>;
`Feldstein, Mark <mark.feldstein@finnegan.com>; Gupta, Raj <Raj.Gupta@finnegan.com>; UPL-PGR-
`FINNEGAN <UPL-PGR-FINNEGAN@finnegan.com>
`Cc: Klecyngier, David M. <dklecyngier@bakerlaw.com>; Carson, Charles C. <ccarson@bakerlaw.com>;
`Rick, Michelle <MRick@bakerlaw.com>; Bucca, Daniel <dbucca@bakerlaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`Dear Counsel,
`
`We are bit confused by your assertion. Dr. Jacobsen unambiguously relies on the testing in the ’727
`patent. For example, we cited to paragraph 52 of Jacobsen’s declaration in our original email. Indeed,
`unless Jacobsen did not review this portion of the ’727, it is unclear how the data would not influence
`his opinion.
`
`Further, we would also like to confirm that you and UPL investigated the availability of underlying
`material, correct? And that nothing was found? We understand such material allegedly existed as the
`’727 plainly states, e.g., "trials were carried out at various locations in India.” Accordingly, the results
`provided in the ’727 would presumably be averages. As you are aware, disease control is based on
`disease severity/pressure. As such, we expect disease severity/pressure would have been collected to
`determine a % control.
`
`To this end, we further note that the testing protocol used in the ’727 patent is at issue. Since these
`trials were “carried out at various locations in India” and you are representing the data and protocol
`material, etc. do not now exist, we now ask whether you will voluntarily make available the one inventor
`who may be able to provide information as to the trials in India: inventor, Rajju Devidas Shroff,
`residence in India. For convenience, we would be willing to take the deposition remotely.
`
`Kind Regards,
`
`Toni Herbert
`Partner
`
`
`
`Washington Square
`1050 Connecticut Ave N.W. | Suite 1100
`Washington, DC 20036-5403
`T +1.202.861.1578
`
`therbert@bakerlaw.com
`bakerlaw.com
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`

`

`From: Guerra, Kenneth <Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2023 6:52 PM
`To: Bucca, Daniel <dbucca@bakerlaw.com>; Feldstein, Mark <mark.feldstein@finnegan.com>; Gupta,
`Raj <Raj.Gupta@finnegan.com>; UPL-PGR-FINNEGAN <UPL-PGR-FINNEGAN@finnegan.com>
`Cc: Herbert, Toni-Junell <therbert@bakerlaw.com>; Klecyngier, David M. <dklecyngier@bakerlaw.com>;
`Carson, Charles C. <ccarson@bakerlaw.com>; Rick, Michelle <MRick@bakerlaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`[External Email: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.]
`
`Counsel,
`
`Your emails misrepresent Dr. Jacobsen’s Declaration and provide neither factual nor legal bases to
`support your request for data underlying examples in the ’727 patent. Nevertheless, UPL has
`investigated and was unable to locate any data beyond those reported in the ’727 patent.
`
`Best,
`Ken
`
`Kenneth S. Guerra
`Associate
`Pronouns: He, Him, His
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001-4413
`+1 202 408 4124 | mobile +1 219 576 4160 | Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com | www.finnegan.com
`
`From: Bucca, Daniel <dbucca@bakerlaw.com>
`Sent: Monday, December 18, 2023 10:31 AM
`To: Feldstein, Mark <mark.feldstein@finnegan.com>; Guerra, Kenneth
`<Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com>; Gupta, Raj <Raj.Gupta@finnegan.com>; UPL-PGR-FINNEGAN <UPL-
`PGR-FINNEGAN@finnegan.com>
`Cc: Herbert, Toni-Junell <therbert@bakerlaw.com>; Klecyngier, David M. <dklecyngier@bakerlaw.com>;
`Carson, Charles C. <ccarson@bakerlaw.com>; EXT-Mrick@bakerlaw.com <Mrick@bakerlaw.com>
`Subject: RE: Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`EXTERNAL Email:
`
`Counsel,
`
`Further to our email below, we ask that you respond to our email about producing data relied upon by
`Dr. Jacobsen by the close of business Tuesday (December 19th).
`
`Regards,
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`

`

`Daniel Bucca, Ph.D.
`
`T +1.202.861.1575
`M +1.703.402.9442
`
`
`
`From: Bucca, Daniel
`Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 2:29 PM
`To: Feldstein, Mark <mark.feldstein@finnegan.com>; Guerra, Kenneth
`<Kenneth.Guerra@finnegan.com>; Gupta, Raj <Raj.Gupta@finnegan.com>; UPL-PGR-FINNEGAN <UPL-
`PGR-FINNEGAN@finnegan.com>
`Cc: Herbert, Toni-Junell <therbert@bakerlaw.com>; Klecyngier, David M. <dklecyngier@bakerlaw.com>;
`Carson, Charles C. <ccarson@bakerlaw.com>; Rick, Michelle <MRick@bakerlaw.com>
`Subject: Syngenta v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`Counsel,
`
`We note that in Dr. Jacobsen’s Declaration he relies on the examples of the ‘727 patent as
`“demonstrating the effectiveness of the fungicidal combinations of the invention … as shown in Table
`1.” Ex2020 at paragraph 52. As such, we ask that you provide all data and assessments in relation to
`the Examples referred to in the ‘727 Patent and Table 1 including any testing/experimental protocol, the
`underlying data for disease control, and any calculations or determinations of efficacy, disease control,
`and synergistic effect.
`
`Regards,
`
`Daniel Bucca, Ph.D.
`He | Him | His
`Counsel
`
`
`Washington Square
`1050 Connecticut Ave N.W. | Suite 1100
`Washington, DC 20036-5403
`T +1.202.861.1575
`M +1.703.402.9442
`
`dbucca@bakerlaw.com
`bakerlaw.com
`
`This email is intended only for the use of the party to which it is
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`

`

`addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
`confidential, or protected by law. If you are not the intended
`recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying
`or distribution of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited.
`If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately
`by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
`
`Any tax advice in this email is for information purposes only. The content
`of this email is limited to the matters specifically addressed herein
`and may not contain a full description of all relevant facts or a
`complete analysis of all relevant issues or authorities.
`
`Internet communications are not assured to be secure or clear of
`inaccuracies as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
`destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore,
`we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are
`present in this email, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result
`of e-mail transmission.
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please advise
`the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please advise
`the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please advise
`the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please advise
`the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please advise
`the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please advise
`the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`Page 9 of 9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket