throbber
BEFORE THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS,
`
`THE PATENT OFFICE
`
`KOLKA1A
`
`in !qe na:cr .f Die Paei’Is M, 1970 as iiprdei b’v The
`Patents iAirerdn-ent Ac! 2005:
`
`In the mallet of The Ptert? Ainenc1nionI) RtiLs 200ui an
`as ;4lflerrsd fl 201(,
`
`And
`
`1 336/KOL2O13
`In The Mi:er of Patent A phciticr No.
`dated November 26, 2013 in the narie at UPL LIMITED,
`ErihUed “A METHOD FOR CQNIROLLING RUST”, havhu
`its oruicipal p12cc o b’jsines! a Agrcrhemical PIaiL
`Durqachak HaIda —721 602, Midnacn’o UI%t We1 eri!
`1111112.
`
`Applicant
`
`.
`
`Page 1 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035 L.1j2
`
`i-SI
`
`SYNGENTA v. LJPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`_____
`
`APHDAVIT
`
`IT GiLsm .4pi’9cr1c’ Henl7or?&qiIdo Do O/heha, sclenri!y arlrrn and deciare as jider inni the Global
`Pcor;nn? Leiiii — Ssralecy & .?wo]t:or, rir LJPL &r:-inI Ltd.
`( am t3irO of !i;’c sub1&i matfoc £:iNi!.’;eø
`as b&?ia p:eJse’Rr/y amended, in wpr a if fluE lr:dian L/I.’hCit7lY1
`33&KCE 2O 3 ai air
`nanisct n; flu prosoit ej’takn’i
`
`1
`
`2
`
`I tid’df? hem rovidcd ‘uth the cpy of lidian Palieril Application No 1 336K0U2013 (reteried
`herein aer as
`‘133m,
`the ri:pe DI UPL LTD unlilied
`A METHOD FOR
`CONTROLLING RUST.
`
`fllJ in
`
`The presc:nt
`r.veflhion re?atUs :o a funqii:EaI t:i;nbindpon Comprising at east ens rnUItLs:te
`(unqirudo and al least two vsrernc 1tnqcides selected from a 11i19cflUO:JtsIcIe i1i1hior a
`qulnone nside i.q.iiibit.ar, a ciQrneLhyIalion nhibii>r art] a succraIe dehydrenatw I9nbilc
`1I!E preGent invCflhiofl also mobiles o a rnethcd ft]r treating soybn rs in a host legLirninoils
`r:lan by di,plng Iliese cor’it:.ratlDns AccordingEy Ihe peainL invent’on relates to a Iriple
`cumhinal:on of fungic;des essentially Ore ol The uses of Ihis r:nnibnatcl9 Is aqanst Rsiari
`soybean rust
`
`:3. &0 providing data thai esbihirshos tiattrna presoitly c’ainiet CD91LW1HIIOnS are syrergisic,
`I hereby explain L’lo¼’ the need for he present rwenhon
`
`Need for th& invention:
`
`4.
`
`Experiments weic concluded at the Eouncdiron t’M Rnndonopotis the Univursty ci Rio
`Verde arid instititions pal ticuatinq in the Cooperative I esorig f rungcdes (beqirirriny in
`?003é04) Thest xperinien1s proved 11w redut:tibn
`of
`control
`effectiveness y
`conlpariricj
`the oHrforinarce of aonazcje ftinqicides ri the 2och/’r season with the
`season 2012/13 l; the season 2005/06 tue avei ape rust control by ronazole lurgicides
`was 903%. After eight oacs. corcesponclig to the ?UI?f13 season ronr•l of conaznte
`rcing cicles was 520% wiTh a redurion in efficacy cii 42% labu 1).
`
`Table 1 Reducee scyhean rust coi-trcl by conan1e fur9cides
`
`S No.
`
`Fungtide
`
`I
`
`-
`
`..
`
`—.
`
`[3
`14
`
`.
`
`I.
`i-prxicoriazoIe
`fehucortazole
`Mean
`
`brops year
`]2005/O6
`95 0
`0
`5.U
`90.3
`
`I
`
`..
`
`-
`
`2012/13
`2.0
`4U U
`
`32.O
`
`Perrcentaqe
`fredisciion
`
`40.0
`326
`k2.D
`
`Page 2 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-000l7
`
`

`

`0
`
`N.
`
`C0 V
`
`U
`
`Vt
`C,
`
`0 ‘
`
`-I-,
`
`C0
`
`C CC
`
`)
`
`2)a
`
`c
`
`,
`C
`
`4
`
`Sr
`
`x
`
`S.
`
`“I
`
`‘S1
`
`-‘S
`
`1;
`
`Vie—
`C,
`
`3
`
`Ciinrrole3.
`
`[C
`
`It— a
`
`C
`
`o
`
`C)
`
`U a
`
`=a
`r
`
`-n
`
`-J—
`
`Cl’
`
`CL
`C)
`
`a
`
`c03-
`
`-
`
`0
`
`2-
`
`003C
`
`,)
`
`C,
`
`) Sa C
`0 aC2
`
`(1
`
`C 2[
`
`ct
`
`C)
`-U
`
`r;
`
`0C
`
`-4
`
`)C a
`0 N
`
`Ca
`
`C)
`’)
`
`3 F
`
`3
`
`2 0a C
`
`D
`
`ci
`
`CD
`
`0
`
`N0
`
`CI)
`
`-.
`‘-E
`
`N)
`-4
`
`CDt
`ri
`
`<0
`II
`<9
`
`3‘
`
`—
`
`It
`
`C
`
`a2
`—C
`—ci
`5..
`
`3
`
`‘C
`3_
`‘.3
`to
`
`c
`
`(C
`
`Ct
`
`LI)
`It
`
`vp
`.)0
`N)
`I)
`
`—C
`N)
`-‘3
`
`C—,
`
`-J
`
`u
`
`‘3
`-0
`
`S
`
`0 (
`
`C V
`
`S
`
`CC
`C:
`
`2C
`
`CD
`-:
`
`C
`
`[C
`
`2
`
`‘C
`
`o
`
`it
`
`-J
`
`II
`
`C a2
`
`3
`
`C’,
`
`N
`)
`
`-
`
`—4
`
`o V
`
`u
`
`-U
`
`.t
`
`‘—..±?t
`
`—j..j!4—
`
`ee
`
`c
`
`Ciumirole1%
`
`I——.
`
`“I
`
`-—
`
`‘4
`
`I—a
`
`7—.
`
`—
`
`- -
`
`I,
`
`-
`
`•
`
`4
`
`I
`
`I—
`
`—
`
`L4
`
`0
`
`—C
`C,
`
`aa 3 U
`
`?
`
`C)
`
`-I
`
`U
`
`C-j
`C,
`[—3
`
`t
`Cf
`
`C‘
`
`Ce,
`Ct
`fl
`
`4,
`a.
`
`-I
`1)
`
`-4
`
`1’,
`3-
`—I
`
`3
`
`C,
`C,1
`Vu
`Cl,
`
`0)
`
`-‘3
`
`I 0 C
`
`D
`
`N)
`4.
`
`+ pc
`m
`
`c 0O
`0 -
`
`i C
`3c
`
`)
`
`[.0
`
`(0
`
`-Ic;’
`00 .aw
`0-a
`a-I
`‘3—
`
`W
`0M
`
`on
`.fl
`
`Co
`
`0S
`l>
`Cz0I
`0-
`z-
`
`ll
`
`C
`
`(0
`b14
`
`l
`C-
`
`3
`m‘
`
`(0
`.v
`
`

`

`the elfedjvsness of this n;Ixkjre has beeri
`2013114 seasnn on’y 4lYn conlro[
`
`eiciijced by 6.54% per year.
`
`ieiching [he
`
`10
`
`Figuie 3 depics :he rcUucHcl r;onlro’ ot soybean rust ty cyprooDnazoie + prcoxysrobin
`mixaice over sx sersons.
`
`v
`
`—Qx ÷ 14)4)
`= 0,5H!4)
`
`L)4
`
`SO
`74)
`
`41)
`
`20
`
`10
`
`I-fr
`
`-:
`
`-s
`
`I E
`
`C
`
`a
`
`S
`
`aCt
`
`4-
`
`•I’e Ii IpIU Is;
`
`11
`
`lisrnq the eqJatiori v = + lOOM 9.Ox II w;ls caicul.ated Ihal from 2008/Dc) the el[cc!iveriess
`of he rnxture cyprt)c:r]nazde
`picoxysirohin. nas been reduced b 9 0% per year
`ieachrng 37% curiicI r.rop in 2013/14
`
`12.
`
`Fiyiire 4 depicfs the rediced coritro) of soybean usi
`niixkjre over si sraaoris
`
`by epoxiconazole t pyracloslibbIn
`
`li.IIJ
`9)
`FI)
`74)
`(‘4,
`
`-‘I.’
`
`il)
`29
`III
`Ii
`
`-J
`
`I
`
`%$
`#
`
`.
`
`Itui A Iiriq
`
`$5.
`
`,#
`
`Page 4 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`J i.
`
`

`

`13.
`
`14.
`
`The riix1ure ‘e:mx:conazo!e + pyracostrobii has been ‘used since LiUY/08 Witi fl:+
`the nercentoge at annual redLc:horI
`c.onirol (%) x
`÷ 99,0 -1 2,6x [w[wi oy
`eqLIhon y
`the effectiveness at
`t[i’s
`harvest
`of contoIj, h v/as atcu;atei hat from the
`nixtt” has been decreased by 126% per year. reacI-in lh last season 23%.
`
`Figure 5 dep,cts t[ average rediclion at Hoy’uc’an rust rontro by cyproconazole +
`azoxyIribin, epoxicuriacIe + pyrac.Iotrobin ind cyproccriainle ± preoxystrobin over six
`000soris.
`
`I’ll
`
`“II
`
`‘II
`
`. Sri
`
`411
`
`ill
`
`Iii
`
`a
`
`4,/
`
`I
`
`4’
`
`“P
`
`,,‘
`
`•g
`
`,“.‘
`
`4.
`
`‘iii::, V
`
`15.
`
`16,
`
`17
`
`18.
`
`IU.
`
`Accomirij to the eqtidlicn y z-99x + ‘1000 from 2’DD/D9 the 3v0Fage eflecti’,eness at
`and
`picoxystrotNn’
`“cypft’conazoie
`azoxystrobin”,

`cyprocc)n3zo +
`flixtures
`9 Q’¾ i-
`opoxicanazoo • pyraciostrobin” nvei six crops lia Len rediit:,J
`icachina 3/% in the Ia& season
`
`Fgjure 3 depicts t reduced control .:1 soybean ‘ijsl for azcxytibin cner six seasons
`
`It was observed that froru the 2005/09 season, the’e was reduction ri the control o(/kSian
`soybean rtn using azoxystiohin and reached only’Ib% olconirni in the 2013)14 season
`
`tlsing the equation y = ± 928 13,S ii was determinud that from 20D9!10 the effEcacy at
`this tungicide has been teducea by ‘13.8% per year and endini by reaching the 2013,
`at only 1 ‘S’”..e1 ‘Don trot
`
`A study was conductecs In determine the oamtrhuliun of the addition of niancuzee to the
`known mixtures at ‘‘1icIyiurin ‘F triaiotes7 The experimeis were uonduc.ted in the field,
`in nine different Iccation where the contrihuunri of the. addiliori of mancon± to the
`t’iszclns” was obsnved.
`rM-n’centage control ohseved using irlixturos of “strobilulin ‘I
`
`Page 5 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`______
`
`_______
`
`______
`
`_________
`__
`
`20
`
`Twa closes woe [€ed
`(1.5 arid 2 0 kg / lia with lJaiiciIjs numbers ci rnancozeb
`appl:r;3tions The uffent of macozdi fl 5kg / ha) inr,orpoiat€’
`Kito ‘Di) i’iiflerrI.j mxtu4
`as aiso tesled
`
`21 Mnccieh arirulation vas used /W1 WDG water disparsible granula, conirnercia ly
`a,a;13h1e
`for aili’ation as nirrczeh.
`
`22.
`
`Table 2 lists Un? prccentage canirn’ of soybean rust by mixing flNtulCs of ‘strobiluriri +
`Fr H/ole witn na wilhcu; auded r-nancozob anplied L[iree
`inies rn
`‘‘o gro ups of
`Pheninogica s’aces of soybean. evaluated v the ales L1nCCI the disease crc.inss
`curve IAUDPC
`
`S r’To
`
`A;xture
`
`1
`
`‘2
`
`3
`
`6
`
`Cyprocona2oe
`A.’nrjstrohir
`$yproconazole
`
`Picowystrohrn
`
`Thhuconazole
`
`Mean
`
`Mancozob
`Wthout
`42.8
`
`74.0
`
`[DiUerence in percentage
`DOfllfol
`31.2
`
`+
`
`I
`
`19
`
`131
`
`I
`
`Seventy in The coqirol = 10%
`
`CV
`
`4 6c):.
`
`23.
`
`1 able 3 ists the perce9taqe cririliol of soybean rust by riixttjres of ‘strobihirin
`triaales
`v’th or will’oul added niancozeb applied tflIeH times at d;lfererz gro’vlfl stages and
`assessed thc± seveniy in leaflet
`
`S No
`
`ixiure
`
`proconaole ± tax tnhw
`
`‘T
`I?
`
`IPycIoslrc
`3JThhticonazole + Pcnxystrobiii
`jMean
`Sevwily in the oonlw = 77 3%. CV
`
`64:3%
`
`rvla ncczeb
`/cahni4
`
`(58:
`40.5
`
`57.B
`
`I..
`
`75.2
`H
`31 3
`
`1 :‘itterenbc
`poir:enitage
`koonirol
`2
`347
`
`235
`
`24.
`
`25
`
`Prom the expet menial resulI, it ws thus tourd that
`the ic1dkion of the niaricazeh
`fungicide not uri’y enhances the prr:entg’2 control, but also reverts tie ohsenjed ctriLrol
`to the original
`levei of O%.
`
`1 hus. in view ci the above results, it was surpnsngly found hat the addiiori ci niancozeb
`nrjeased corilicI of ‘ust ‘sith the ;urI’Jert. anal ‘ii1[Jlc’iIe mixture Di mixLunez of ‘‘strobiluri,.
`
`Page 6 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`_
`

`

`I
`
`triazoles
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28.
`
`The coriboalion of a deinethsrlation ntihitor and a qHinorr outside ririi)itc’r flas ucen
`known to be used or the control of Esian soybean rust, pwtoulnrly n Braz I. However,
`these cori;biiations has decayed by
`the emoacy (ii
`it has heen seen reeenU Uiat
`tire cancellation of tIies rEgis1rations by the 6razIir
`to
`!e;idu1cj
`rude chari 50%.
`itqulatoiy aulhoiity MAPA In tact. e&rna1y as 63 existing reqisiratiors for thu control i,P
`efficacy
`decay
`Lu
`due
`Airan soybean rust were usriceiled
`h?psJ’wwt’s errbrapa.br?eiibua-de-noticIa&/r.oticil19373761riia.suscende-ieislro-
`de63ftrnc.ccI2spara controle-da ferr:. q-rIti-da-soja
`
`ri
`
`in
`
`Vhs regulatory action was uIjh:hcd on the Brazilian Official Gazehe {Act
`71)
`n
`Decembet, 2016. The action was based on Ihe ovaIuann o ofFectivenew reports and
`ft.chnical opuniol’.s by tire Technrr:4I Comniissrc;ri of icgr:morrrIc Revaluation of Pesticides
`Fejrniulated Products for the Conrcl of Pskys.ic.it:-.ci;y;?i; on Sotean Cioc
`
`Some Df the prodt;cts ftu which th€-i cfxsiirq reqslratiofls were cancelled were knower
`combinations of de’nelhylation inhik;rors and quin:nie outside inh;b ters Scrc’ of these
`products lam which the ecoinniendalons were sIJspt2ilded are
`
`Con-nec cial Narire
`
`Composition
`
`MArA Req ster NC
`
`RCADA
`
`kresoxinimethyl ÷ tebijccna,u:u
`
`8511
`
`Sovcr?I tailed attenipts in the prior art to conirol soybean rust
`
`29
`
`3D.
`
`3 1
`
`Applicant ‘iAtcs that the method of :;ontiohinq soybean rust us also a technnrar feaLre vht:lu
`us the or curial ing pa nt For cDnfer’ I in uuvefty and j ‘ivoru ie sic r on the cia cried rnDthad I his
`is because Inure rave reDi’ nume ous fai cr1 alttirr;pts in Inc aie of th. mit
`Ci conlra!tiriq
`soybean r.ist. and that :ie present invention ac;ovcs success nhere such n’Jrnerous prior
`kitlen’pts in ilic state of thu It have Iai[e.
`
`ri ornertn describe Lbe slate &tlie an aithetirne o’1ling efihe above or :a:cr. and a Icing
`fL need for a fungionda! combination as disclosed in Iheaoplr;atiun and recuhd n the cu’rentl
`punding claims, we p’ovudo flue foiky’ni;
`
`li’e applir;cliori as ciruqiriaUv filed, discioses triple Eombinati Dii or a least heo Iungirin1es
`
`Page 7 of 179
`
`SYNGEPITA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`cnlrprislriq at least are rnittAsite furigic:d such ris ditiiwcarbamatu (tingk.ide, at lcst one
`sdccnate nehydmgorias inhibitor furcide ancUcr at ‘es 311€ Quin::•re outside nhititor
`fL;ngicid andfor at
`leasl one demel’rylat’on inhibitor
`fungicide,
`arid
`the use of
`sUch
`•ooinbinatinn in lieairiq soybean rust Ax such,
`the application is directed to a furiqrdal
`cOn’biiiIion cornprisiri a nijlti.sjtc• coilacI ¶un•icide ccJ[9Ocarbar11aei and two sys[emi’c
`Iunqirirjes ‘:succinate dehydrcenase ntiihitor Quiriole CLitsida nhibitor fungicide, andör
`derriath ylation ir•l’ibilc’r: The oidini claIms aiD dwuted to the Iipe coinbiqaticjn of ‘jnqic dcc
`and [he use of such crnhinaon in treahng .soyxi’i rust
`
`Sot,ean rus also elerreuto as Asian soybean iul ‘s caused by P,awooso,a wich’,’thizi and
`is +n agjresstve lnJlho9en that as
`detected n Ihe U.S. n Lhe fall of 2004 Since then to
`Ike Inc .yf f’lirs of ne nMant applica’uon,
`it had sp’ead from
`:4ia to. atleasl, A’rmca, South
`America. and the U S Yield losses ‘ere estlinacd to be see& w’”i this ise
`api almost
`10-80% have ucen reported. Despite signiñcant ellorts to sustain soybean rust, it has ter a
`record crob:ouI (or soybean gIower in the sOLttw.sslern United S1aes.
`
`Ike control of styhean rust sa ma;or concern for soyeJfl puducers. For exflrnp;e. soybean
`r,;st-mediatod y.eld losses sciween 130% and 1(i[Y: were leixited n Brazil P;iraguay. aid
`Soun Africa diving the ear y 200Cs. Yo;iriofl, J,T, ci aL, Epic/emits of snyhean rust
`(Phzikc’osora eiitvr.bz.
`in Dme.rm and Para.Jjav horn 2001 to 2003 Plant Dis 2X)S, 3G. 675—
`
`ti 1
`
`Yilr] l0551J!; eshinated at 25% were first rec-orted troni conirncmc’I Iietds in t1ississippi in 21)00
`Aflen, T. W eta!., A contitttiinq saga: soybean rust in the continental United States, 2004
`to 2013. OutIoDks Pest ttThnag. 2014, 25, l1—174.
`
`‘Starling with me ?003/20r4 so?bean prc&cti’ season, economic losses du9 to the disease
`(including ccsts ::-t contrcl:l ha’se been esImated at rrore thai 5? bilion annually Schctrn ot
`a?., Crop Protection. 28(2009) 774-782
`
`rn 2012. cc ybean rust reduced y:eld by over 60% n ‘ 200 h in Alabama, Sikora, F,J. ci a!..
`Observations on soyh can rust
`rnannçscrnenl
`in Alabama in 2012.
`In Proceedings
`at the Southern Soybean Disease Workers 401k Armni& MeetirQ, Pensacola Beach, FL USA.
`13—14 March 2013
`
`Since from 2001200? crop season Ia 2011/2012 crop season, the a[nJLillt spent in c3ntR’11i4
`soybean iust Increased om USD 1 (I rnilln to L’SI) 1.73 bilNon Qodoy, CV. eta?., Asian
`soybean rust in Brazil: Past, presenW ann (orate. PesquisaAgropec4sAria Brasileira. 2016,
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`31
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37
`
`Page 8 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`iic disease was slnhiti?d to cause ie d oSses ohip to
`51(?:407—42l. See Table I
`ri lIi industry. udgezt by Israpidepansion,
`lie irrlpDrlai’ce of soyteari rusi was ‘:ery evideni
`irulenc, aid amount ot osses. T9se are alsn [‘hI:htcd in Dr flodnys 5dy esinatinq
`fri
`qrain losses and coss due to Asian soyceon rust cjritm’j[
`
`f the Instant
`
`38. r-1 most commonly iJsE(l for soybean rList rnanaqc’iic il. until pihlk€jtii’j
`iiihibrois DMlm and
`rkirionyIatc’:i
`into :wa ciasss
`applicatr, v,’e typoally iln;I’:le(l
`4UflO9e ZR;tsrie iiiibiicrs (Qol) DM1 an Gd fungicides kite !oc-ally systemic, irbiinl Ma;
`thin the ea hut nUl neccosarily horn Iea Ic leaf
`they are laken up by the eases and i’iavo
`srobi1unns
`Several DM1 and Qol fuijcides, iiclidjqq 6 riazoles. 2 s;rohilurhs 5 triazoles
`use tcr 3obean rust contra. Since
`fits!
`trazoIe + hsrizridazole have hri
`aid I
`lurcicidos emer.janry recoiniended for ie 2002iC3 season (aza:qs:robin di1enocoriio
`and et1;conazoIe:i rnarw rUW’Q (flu ation: were
`flucsnazolo. pyraclosticibir • cpo;icon.aznl€,
`added to the arsen3i to contra! rust. Sensiliv.ly nioiitoring tests by vancts groups in the
`iiica’Wy over the
`industry rE-:iale’:l that the &f cacy of the kingicr3es has boon decrear.’nc Sc:
`
`:sears
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`clear trer;d iowarcls decreasinqelficacy of funq.ciaes in cOrilr3ll iç so’cear
`Research shows
`rust severity Cr inceasing yield iii 2013. when corr’pared with 2006 o 200/
`Id.
`
`Stuthes roricluctod by Dr Cli:iia Viaira Goicy a:encwnocl and hichly puhisrcd scientst in
`:tau-.; . including spec lic;IIy soybean rust sont’oI
`abl:stied a
`the field ni kuigci’:la I co-nt
`iliiKtures towwds lIie .Ofltrol
`graduaL rtecay in thc &fcacy ni froblunns or c’jnazoles or Erci
`of soybsin rus with their use 9radLiaIIy o’Jer the years Claudia Weira Godey, Risk and
`Management Df Fungicide Resistance In the Asian Soybean Rust Fungus Phakospora
`pachyrhizi, Fungicide Resisfance in Ctop Protection: Risk and Management (ad. TS,
`Thind CAB International 2012 Coiutiinatior,s ct strcakiriris w lh lnazoles irnprovd dsaa
`tIuu+Juued1eiiom1ance:Thfiazolus
`arid yield loss cnm,lril concyed with eilhL?r class alone .
`ii asohed a level at wi:ri rust
`obsir’od 7 years after the inlrodimotion cit P pachyrh/zi in Hra,mI
`the se of straiqht s,nies has
`rj,’
`control with straighi azc.Ios became i:ns;iLisIacc’ry. Sine
`l)Rii- deceasing a-idh use of trmaole-- strcbilur’r n1xtires was intensified s tI’e niaOr
`statoqy to ‘educe the ii of resistnce. Id. Ilowever the cornbnaiOn of such Irizole ano
`slichilurin dd not piovido a consistent suyeai1 rust conVol ested from 2006J07 to ?0U91lD.
`the suidies show a decrease ri the eftacy at the combination of triaznle and
`lit PLrther
`frcbiIuin after use over a few years Id
`
`41
`
`A:.v cu aflce pen&rlinq a ineta-anelticai syntriesis ot the isuts of 71 ijr.ltorni fLn9icide
`trials Dontair ng R30 spc’c1k:: fungicide trek3tn’ents for the control of soytean rust and yet
`
`Page 9 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA V. UPL, PGR202300017
`
`

`

`42.
`
`43.
`
`concluded thai c.DiI;binalions of strcbilurrs with trjazoles was the Lest Ireatmert avajable iii
`he rdtslr. Scherrn. H. e( at. Quantitative review of fungicide efficacy ttlal-s for
`nianagbtg soybean rust in Brazil. Crop Proteclion. 2009, 28. 774-782. Latei. evidence
`showed that even the efficacy of this best -usihIe reatmen b\ c:jrnhinauons of slrobuurins
`c’iiTh 1riazclo was seen to be 3ecayiix eith jaot:al decay I:rQcI Il’s years Id Coir;biiialions
`of triatulus with a benz!nhidazDIa fiinqi:
`did not irnpf0i2
`:nrnn:ired witi Iria2OIes alcre
`
`Id.
`
`A newok cit
`InitOinl kingciot iials (LII- I s}, involved in ani,ually e’.a1uatin luncicides since
`the 2C<2i(i season orovided uviiJenc. stigqes.tuig a deell:ie in sens livily wthirl the local f
`j:ai;?:yyz; populations to irult pl f.:,qudes, sinco elicar:v nas been roativel’9 ‘rA’/ arc
`appentl’j ecreasing in recent years rgrnnnred to pre’iimis reports. Godoy eta)., 51(5):407-
`421
`
`II was reported that in ZODS?U6 season rust averajc CLHIITo. y DMls was [90.3% •Mler only
`eiuht seasons. corresponding to 201213, DM1 cenircil was 520%. sncwiiq 4?% control
`efficacy redi.iction Godoç C. V. et . Eüciáricia de fun gicidas pani a conEroio cia
`ferru gem- -asiãtico do soja, Phaknpsora pacliyrhizi,
`urn so fro 2012/13: resultaclos
`sumar&ados dos etwaios caoperativos. Londrina:2013 (Circular
`recnica, 9a) PR.
`Setenihro, 2011 7 p. The edtiolion in Pp sensiliv ly to the ftjnciicides Ivtniconazoe and
`cyproconazc!e. with only 42 and 38S control, rescc1;vety. was also establshed Gorfoy. C V:
`Palave;; I, Ensaio cuuperativo para avaliação do efici&icia dc fun gicido no control., do
`ferrugeni do soja. em Londrinji, PR, no sake 2010/11. In: Rcueiiáo do pesquisa cie sq/a
`cia reçjiio central do BrasH. 3Z, 2011, São Pedro. Resuoios. Sac Pedro, 2011,
`In tha
`same season, DM1 + Qul milL.res did no
`reduced effooncy ye:. cypoconazole +
`:l7oxyslrotiri had 72% orirr,l and pyraclostrobin t epoxyconazole, &B% control At this tinio
`the mean control for the mxtures was 80%.
`Id. It is likely that the otfec1iv&ness was ensurca
`by Qols. as th uuctnl uiein rr DM1 was only d0Y Sd DM1 and ‘:2o1 ILnoicides c+ct on only
`one speorfic sue of ihoiisii rcs of bin’:hemical reaclions in the tuiqal ce
`reretsre they are
`unerable to fLi’cial sIrdin sMection towards sensiti.’ty rec1i:1ion or loss The difficulty in
`coniroling ASR wiLl
`lunqicides is heccning ncneasingy evident. Lq the high ñjn[9al
`aaaptzoilky. Godoy et at, Londrina:2013 (Circzil.jr Tócrica.
`PR,Se(entbro. 2013;
`Schrnitz, H. K ef at, Pest Managevteexte Science, 2013. As an exinipfe tebuconazole
`&1cienc has becri uiNdiiaIIv redu:ed from 90% to 24% rn ten soascis (ci Sonic ac:ons
`shuId be taken In iroki AS •cheniraI control reach 80-90% eticioncy:qain as in 2002i03
`lo 2CCBt- grow rio seasons fri
`
`Page 10 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`44.
`
`4i,
`
`46.
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`49.
`
`DiIa obtoinel from the studies corducted by ‘ubrapa Soy1ear, sI-o’ned a marked rrduciion
`ri Inc efficacy 0f soybean rust ron[rul. Claudia
`witi an increase in the reduction vory year,
`‘Ch3n yes in prfnmtance of SBR fun qicid’s over the years and new
`V. Cocky,
`nlanaqoflrent sfrategies adopted in Brazil, Enthrapa SoybeanS BR — slide presentation
`Ye, dudng those years &riost 0% of the soybi’i rust cont’oI 000sIrv was using nictures of
`systsr’ic turigicides despI.e oithe rE1ucfion in efficacy. Id
`
`repc’its of resislnce to [)M aim:I
`The poor fungicide pertonnces are ssiby linked it
`201.3 Schmitz, H. K. ot a?., Sensitivity of Phakopsoro
`Gel fi.i!icideS Schm,tz et al
`arid
`and demethylaUon-inli{bitors,
`towards qtsinnric-outsde-inIiibitors
`pachyrMzl
`coriesponding resistance inuchanisnis Pest N1naq. Sci. 2013, 70:372-388.
`
`As such, the industry was lw:ed with a prnbicrm ‘n the rc’sistait inaragenwrI DI furicida!
`corfliriatic:i’s and was in the need of a sniut,on to address s•jh pi ublem t reduc;n9 ercscy
`ur krcwr Fiiriqicides tawares soyuean rust
`
`11Th) efñcac of Lombinal’uns of varicLs systemic
`e decrease iii
`Rcognizinq the problem,
`ii&s were
`the effic;icy of be systemic fur
`liinqicides differert auproaches to nanI-iiri
`undertaken
`
`rarbencla:irn + Ihram or
`liealej wh comtnrIat(Jr’ of
`Soyoaar seed was
`epoxicorrazotc
`arid
`pyr:lcstrohin
`treatrient with
`toinwed
`by
`flllquiricofla7ritt
`:rifloxisrohin + tebtcc,rls2oie. Godoy and Henning, Pesq. agvopec. bras,1 Braslila, v43,
`n.1O, p1297-13OZ out 2003
`
`fungicdes
`
`+
`
`A prelilix at s’jtonik ‘ii:igi: Des aLOxystrobn and Cyprtro:i2ole) was appl!e1 IC- differen
`growh shoes o cortrrl s.cijbean rniiI. Godoy, (DiV. ef aL, Eticiènci a do centrole cia ferfugeni
`asiatkca da soja em tunçao do memento de apllaaflo sob condiçós de epideinia em
`Londrqua, PR. Tropical Plant Pathology 34 (1) Jamwry - Filbruary 2009.
`
`51)
`
`“.3jtei 2007P00tS the dmrLase in e1fcacy becaiiic a genera] trend for DM1 ung.c des.
`
`it had been
`ihe only oxceptiar was prnlhicconaiule, which vta launciwd ni 2010, •Jthougi
`assessed rce 20052006. Beciisu of Ire redLjc’ad sFfic.c:y of OMIa. prethicuonazolc was
`Ia’jnthed as a mixture wfth Uifloxystrobn.” Got-Joy, C. V. et at,. Pesq. aqropec. bras., Brasitia,
`v51, n. p407-421, male 2016
`
`51,
`
`,age Ivhib tors iSDIis
`Ccmhin1aor.s ccrflpr.sr-o iIQ\, broad-spectruni Sicc.pate I)&-wdro
`(Qols). aqan both .ysten’ic fungicides,
`fungcides rriixed with quinone nUtsde inht:i!c>i
`
`Page 11 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. Ufl.., PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`‘/ere iauncIiri onto [ne market
`ii ?D13. Goday, CV ef aL, BraziU,9n sojibean pest
`management and threats to its susMinabliitv. Outlooks on Pest Management — June
`2015. Trijle conthiniions, conipr’sng a:l systemic kiriqi::ides. were also tested for
`irflCrcrt±Iieflt in th ellicacy comLuiiations in cenlroihnq soybean ii Godoy, C. V. ef 31.,
`Eficiéacia tie fun gicidas pars a controle da fcrrugern-asiátic da soja, Phkopsors
`pachyrhiii, na salts 2014/15: ress.illados sumarizadus tins ensaios coopenativos, p:1-6
`
`52.
`
`Tna offorts hgn,iqhtezt aba/c ri addition Ii> varioua utlw:
`to overconie [lie
`pobteins RssaoiaW:I with cecreas in efñcac •:it tunoi•oici& combinations in treating soybesn
`rt..st
`did
`rot
`esijll
`a
`in
`i’joraHe
`result
`Fur examp,
`seed treatment
`fluqurmonazol de;ayd neftnei he appearance of (ist syrnptoiri nor the ovolutor or
`tie
`jsaa in adiur to uickinq any benefit in the maiaqnlent of List Godoy and Hemiing,
`v.43. nW, p.129?-1302, 2008 rhese i:jdies asu :.nnr.Iuded [Hat rhe addition of a Icliar
`ILnqlcjde reatrtient rerun cii did not [iavi a avorahIe , rfj•jonce on the stRrdari known
`¶uatmenl legilne of slioc Li + ccazol fungiotes for the control of sc’vb4!an rust. d rhis
`Wds a clear teaching away from he scoud mf the preerit rQerIion
`
`V,Ilfl
`
`e(cacy of
`
`Eullnwng the wread ot sovbtan rust a Afitca and South America in the last decc,de the high
`tiazoles in i:ieiwisuwilh a few eceplinns sjch as triadcreronl 4ias been
`ccnrrne n ;‘ILF[l-yeaf Lr.al
`tnes& tEiafs showort that the st1ei:Jiirins, The newest class of
`f:iirjirdes ovkiated !oe Iho iianagemeil of soybean rust, we ulfecli’de in reducing disease
`i:ltersty and associated yield loss.
`
`The mca cfrecti:e strate’j avaiable to. arid unriorstood n,
`the industry — unit diSCc’sej
`in the instant application — was the use of doubt’:’ .s ud ti—plo corliorattens of deniethylation
`inhibitors, quinone inhibitors
`and succinate daiydrrqenasc inhibitors
`at of which are
`s’?stem;ofurigcides—forlhe cnrilra of soybean rust. Howe’ier. siriceeffecthc tirgicidos with a
`new niode ii acton aro not eai:lil uyailahe Ite prnhtems associalcu ‘vth Oecrease in
`tiingicidal efficacy over thr yers nersisld due to tiOsLicCeSSfUt illempts The need to reverse
`si:cb probler-ca v.’itn the elficacy of snternic Jniq.cies was ‘ketl recognized in Pie
`eld of
`‘ringitidal con-l:tnalons.
`
`tie inventors u’tlis appicatiori c9(iLCtOd strides sot Iorth in the lisrani applir;aicn to ornide
`a oiiq-o’naired Rokction for tIn? dre&ful piotern :c’ [ha industry :f li;r9icciai iriihinatci-s icr
`soybean aisi cirtrol
`
`As ;nen1ioad above [in paraqraph I most cc•mniont used fLriglcides w soytean iit
`inariaqemenl unhi puo1ication L)t the insla iii application heonged to dei’iehylaion inhibitors
`
`j4.
`
`55.
`
`56.
`
`Page 12 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`57.
`
`58.
`
`bY.
`
`60
`
`an’i
`
`ol which are ysemic :iinrri.s
`imntIt
`‘nrbilais Qc•I),
`-j.r,oie outside
`(DM1)
`and triple) nn’iibiriaioiis of systenic fur9icides wee Icsted for aiiIio.
`AIthouh ;:urlaii [clotjh
`such as
`a ccnibn alien ci systemic fungicides wilfl nijtisjte tunqcides
`of soybean r jst
`ci .tliocarbacHstLs was ItJ tested prior to the fil nq ol 11w riiflant appli catia
`
`Mull ste fiinycides such as Jithecarhan1 a are interim: in ensure ie çiroleclion 01 Clant:4
`before caIropii attack. They iriList be appliuu bofore the czlhoqens infect 11w plant, torn]ir[
`a protective h,rrer toxic for furiçj and hactera n ptants, Vdhen app1 CD to the surface of plant
`inhhit r. Inc spores
`iincji
`rc. ie iu:Cl, ation of
`tyj
`exert 1;x!C barrie’ pr€ccnt
`nerrn,nat’oD pracess. Synqcnta. B&ethn Ténicc, Pzio,i Xtra.SAo Paufu: Sec:orflqro; 2004,
`
`p. 31
`
`let
`
`the first
`
`lime. describes a funçjicidal ctiib:riaiion ccmmpr’sncj a
`The nitant apc.icslic:i,
`a Ioiq-awa’ted solution to the protlem
`tinq.c:ec- ann lw SySiCifliC ‘unqi’;itlet€,
`miultisne contarl
`Df rnairtairlincj etficac of the combHations tovtards m:ontrot;ing soybean I ust Specification
`as orignafly fled. pige 6.
`
`cr1 p115 P (lOt Ie sI uric flu Iti she :onl aut
`The anpl cation ci is Dlnsis a funqic.icla i 1:0 Ollal ‘‘31
`fui’gicide sucb as ii dithlccarbarnai4 4l.l:i[clde. at least one firsi systemic fungicide (sich as
`ci qicdDi, aid at least one second sjslernic. tcircIcIcJ.2
`a sui:.clnalo dci’ydrciqeriao nmbro’
`i’qi ce’: or a ernethyIatior inhbiar urig.cidei for trs
`(such as a qu i:or,e ouside rihiblto fi
`LcIlrol Asia sojbean rust, fri
`
`Studies rnrtfuctcd by the iwenlors ot the nislant appiication showed that sysleinic furcicid+
`‘ift,tted ecti.iniinoLs ont A’h;le
`cifi:ctiely penetrate We dense canopy ami’ier of Fhe
`il’r— contaci
`ii’:ulIarec.tsv rot alowinq [ho ?lJst paihogon to move mip t!io plan: foliaqt.
`potectiwe ci ti’,IuLaItnate (unqicide component .jf the coiribination efecIil’ penetrated
`l” dense plant folaoe. whPe the systeniicfiingicido comnponerll effcctivey priwented the rust
`the
`educinq
`the plant cffectivey
`Ierila:niig portion of
`;i’fectn9 1im+
`Imon I
`p;4thog’Dl
`Iowa, Js rie riecticr This synerq’slic coniplenmrlaliur’, was nol
`the clart
`susceclIhilly ot
`seen ‘.iben cithe the folar prc:i+ctive fungicide or the Systemic Iui’icicle was indi’dually used
`n isolation bit was obserjed when [he wo tiinr,cIdes i’,ere ‘.isen ri conjur-oton
`
`61
`
`In ±11 hon o a:t1iissncj the Ionq-s:ardng reed [of contro:I’r.i soybean rush in the industry
`the syneristir cornplementation between the contact preventi’edithiocarbin-.ate fuicicide and
`the treatnem;[ amid contro of Phakopsora
`tie cormior,at:on of [we systemic fuigeides for
`species of Linqcdes was toti’i:l to i:’e unexpeclecar:]strD-Isirv
`
`Page 13 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`1 tie understandinq in 9e industi w9s that since systemic funfilcides
`iDMl, Qol, ur
`:ornhiiiaion lt’i
`i:’I were ii’izated It, he ih e besi a’ t;4t)le (or the cont.oi cit soybean riis!,
`there woLia nd be:’iy 9eed ñjr a multisile !cirgicido Svsterric funo:cides such os DM1 and
`Gol, is taker up by i prt and is then Ii ansbcated, wil[iiri the plan systL?Ifl thus proteci4 tti
`plant from: the allac of pathoaenic fungi cr lirritinci api aiready established nfector.. Mwreas
`mullisite fungicide musf be appii’d betore the pathaqens r:fe:l the plant. forming a pi<tc:I ce
`oarrie[ ftxic for fungi and bacicr n plarus. Accodinqly. die t
`tie ci4’€-tern modes of actions
`of system L irid rn.j.115 C kinj:t[uj.s They were nine: ccristcierad ft ta oi-nbiricd unlil after
`the pubtca1 ni of the rsant au plic&icn
`
`is the ;;alt!::cn for toytea” rust is locahy sswrutr There was in Rxr,eo[ed advanlarie to be
`accfucc by Ihe adcition o a iiiu$lste fi:rgicide to d ccimhination of systemic tunciedes in use
`
`The ftseaich ccrmucrei:l oy the inventors, arid the sihecI mdltPr disclosed and rljned,
`in me irllnt appical co found thai the adciticri of a multiste luriqicicie e.g. iancoea to
`of 5cLinate
`C42TiibIfl.t!Ofl
`nehy’jroqc uise
`the
`nhjbiici
`dernef-ii,lalian
`iti”:;cide
`inhib.’tor or qunore oue-idu iiit’ibtor re’erses the daray of efficacy olihe known combination
`and evei Is it to the oriciiriai Ic’i:.,n efficacy or nidler efficacy.
`
`Tria were cnnci.red to aluate the inipoiftint;e of n;anc.ooh in associalion ‘At!; ome
`f1inqicides in r’hokcpsom 93’Jr’.rhizi cortici
`in oyheai- usiriq ‘uanccizeb ii c:wiihinaton
`wili rütures cit strchiluitus, or Iriazotes wth succinale deliydm uLer1ase inhibitai ILinqIEtnas
`
`62.
`
`6:3
`
`64.
`
`GF3.
`
`66.
`
`isolation,
`
`SLu’:Ins lwwed ha: the i,.trtticn of mancoieb.
`to -n 60k
`fungicide ando a srohiIurin
`funQicide ar1dD LI caqazole fLifKJ ride conibitialiun wSEa sLirpi sr;qtv ceae ilnii; what was
`expected Iron, a knowled
`of
`the ncoveinent accrJLm to Pie e1icacy iI
`si.JcDinaie
`dohydrc’genase inhibitci
`lurigickles with either The s?:ohi:Lrin fiingici’:Ie or
`the ronazole
`I! was corstenily rt*der than al east 20% :i.e. double the
`ir’Jmoverrent in the ‘soated s.iccrate dehycreqenase rI’tiIor tun’gicides wilK srobiiurin or
`tfle LYI iaole fungiDldc’)
`
`Funcji::ide
`
`fl
`
`67.
`
`Surputsirig!y,
`in the aoserce of maricozeb.
`the (Lingicidal efficacy of these tLingicdes was
`known it rrauai’.y decay wilt Ii’oi’ usage oyet the years See figure below.
`
`Page 14 of 179
`
`ku
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`Technical Circular5 EMBRAPA
`
`rn,
`
`,
`
`ii?
`
`7 I. tfln ran :-,‘
`
`I
`
`pp 21 1 7;
`
`, ri ‘met
`
`5pvtiii pti2 i.(iiiteIlPl p,,tti 17pri1 IIpiITh:P i1iie ;Phy dte kQ t.i.tlt.pv,I..,ii .+it’i t,up.p,ipp. Li’,’ 1’’’ace
`il hi.,pti I,, i’ tiw p.),, r,lni
`
`L’—_,_
`
`——‘I————F--- —z
`- -, —
`
`—
`
`--
`
`‘J.
`
`;).Z____
`
`4T
`
`.,,*..,.m-.a -
`
`V
`3
`
`4”
`
`0
`
`JrMHI,
`
`i’,iuii I
`
`/ii
`
`)[1fl1)
`
`Jütv I
`
`.‘,-,fl,
`
`t:ic(,.
`
`tI1f1r
`
`JUItiiI
`
`63
`
`69
`
`Tie rrorpoiation ot niaricozeb to io cornnaon reversed he decrease in the elticaoy
`‘ias surorising arfli 000xr3ecIe:
`nt ‘::mtic:I rc, soyhe;in ust by he coiiiuflaters. wr’ic
`
`in Ihe state o the art rot ftingcdes that can
`there tas been 3 diii? roeci
`Accc-rziirq]y,
`eflicaciciusly control mt A&iOr soyberi rust in Rr:lfi and other co:iiilries
`
`ioijjreserited by the InvontlOn:
`
`/0.
`
`71
`
`the Hratiliaii AgriculturaL
`Acccrlil9iy, a study was conirnissk:’nod by EMBRAPA i.e
`Research .cipo-ritimii, ‘Mitch is a stale LwilOil resear[;Ii auncy afliliated wv[th the Brazilidi’.
`r rstry of A.ricuhure Tlu research paper published by G000Y. Ctidia as a res’.ilt
`of this sliidy is annexed hereto arid also offered as posI publishei evidence in suppo’
`of the inventive step 31 Ihu oresert n’€’rilicr.
`
`[his research corrohora1c whal the present invention Eci2ld ai its priortty diLe (2012) Ic
`the additorn of a mu’tiMe fungicide e9 inaiicozeb to the c;ciitinit;rjri o( deiiethyialici;
`the kno’sn
`ci
`i evwsos the lecay of
`effir:;3r:v
`liihiihitor + (1[uJ;CnIe Ot:tSJdU inhibitor
`inhibitor • quinc’ie n itsidu inihi btor and everts ito ihs
`con,biraliun’ o[ deriielhyliLiori
`original krmwi efficacy or helter efia:;i
`
`72.
`
`Fle relevant dala [rem the table 5 ac•pearii1’ in thi. table is reproduced hiuruinbelow
`
`iTrertrr rid
`Thflexysli:iini
`
`* Prmhiocrn’azole
`
`Dosre ( a I Ha’
`60 + 3D
`
`.-e niyi)
`
`Page 15 of 179
`
`SYNGENTA EXHIBIT 1035
`SYNGENTA v. UPL, PGR2023-00017
`
`

`

`Itriloxystrobin
`rnanebzeb
`Tcittox’ptrohin
`nianccizeb
`[1i:1loxyscrohn
`
`T1if1oysi;nhin
`n,ancozcb
`
`+
`
`Prothioconazale
`
`andSO i 30
`
`220
`
`Prothoconzoe
`
`I
`
`•
`
`PieThunconazole
`
`Prothiconazole
`
`ani3O 1 30 + i%)D
`I
`aridQ 30 + 2210
`
`and6o t 30 • 2240
`[
`
`89
`
`121.2
`
`20. I
`
`I
`
`73.
`
`7&
`
`Acr:ording!y,
`it v
`observed that
`ri he presence ol rnancozeb,
`reduction in to peiccnaqe ocidence of soybean rust
`iii erent in the ri
`I t On clai Died 0 he pr esenc invenilorl
`
`there was 15 tO 30%
`
`rhis confirms Ihe inventive step
`
`rnpnrtanlly, these combinalions comprising niancozeb in addition In
`derrie1[iyrtion
`uth:hitor and a quirione outside irihibior were coisidered by EM BRAPA for
`the coriIrnI
`of -chean [List
`1h15 combination was :(und t’asUcceeo where I3 o1he exislt
`pLpciitQtJv 3uccessIulIy_conliol Asian soypeanmst.
`
`The enibinaUons ale yp@rqistic:
`
`75.
`
`1€3
`
`Not only The pesriiy claimed coriibinaions re.iert the ef1cacy of ilie systemic lunqicides
`ID the pro cocay Iceir2. the esuIt;riçj Lrirle coribinabori Of a IfluitIIiH contact fnqrides
`3Rd at cast Wc) FAStenhiC funjticies 3r0 also synergistic This ynerg:stIc colielation
`heM’een these conponents of the c:ci!nhinr4t+cns ‘31 lI

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket