throbber
Vol 70(3) 1·514 (2005)
`
`COMMUNICATIONS IN AGRICULTURAL AND
`APPLIED BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
`formerly known as
`MEDEDELINGEN FACULTEIT LANDBOUWKUNDIGE
`EN TOEGEPASTE BIOLOGISCHE WETENSCHAPPEN
`
`PUBUSHERS
`
`Professoren
`Pascal Boeckx
`Peter Bossier
`GuySmagghe
`Walter Steurbaut
`Els Van Damme
`Erick Vandamme
`Niko Verhoest
`
`EDITORIAL ADDRESS
`Coupure links 653
`9000 Gent (Belgium)
`
`Website: http://www.fbw.ugent/
`
`ISSN 1379-1176
`
`

`

`Comm. Appl. Biol. Sci, Ghent University, 70/3, 2005
`
`193
`
`ACTIVITY OF PLANT AND MINERAL OILS
`IN THE CONTROL OF
`PUCCINIA PELARGONII-ZONAUS
`
`A.T. WOJDYtA
`Research Institute of Pomology and Floriculture
`Pomologiczna 18, PL·96 100 Skiemiewice, Poland
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Effectiveness of plant oils from com, olive, rape, soya and sunflower, oils recom·
`mended for plant protection (Dedal 90 EC, Olejan 80 EC) and mineral oils (Atpolan 80
`EC. lkar 95 EC, Olemix 84 EC and Promanal 60 EC) 1n the control of pelargonium
`rust (Puccinia pelargonif-zonalis) was studied. Oils were applied curatively as a plant
`spray at concentration 1%, 4 times at 7·day-tntervals. After 4-week experiment more
`than 11 uredta per leaf were noted on control plants. At the same time, on plants
`protected wtth oils from olive or soya, lkar 95 EC or Olemix 84 EC uredia number
`decreased at least 501/o. The other oils were not effective 1n a suppression of uredta
`formation. On control plants no uredia were destroyed as compared to 11 to 71%
`destruction on plants protected wtth the tested oils. Oils from olive, soya and also
`At po Ian 80 EC, lkar 95 EC, Ole mix 84 EC caused drying off more than 5001& uredta.
`Furthermore, some oils inhibited germination of ured1ospores on PDA medium (potato
`dextrose agar). Fourteen days after the last spraying more than 83% of germinating
`urediospores were found on control leaves. At the same time spores collected from
`protected plants germinated in 17 to 701/o. Among tested products oils from rape, com,
`sunflower and Dedal 90 EC, Ikar 95 EC. Olemix 84 EC were the most effective.
`In the next part of experiment. plants with visible sporulation of P. pelargonti-zonalts
`were sprayed with I o/o oils. After 1 and 7 days of incubation, total number of spores
`and number of germinating spores were counted. One day after treatment, uredio•
`spores collected from leaf blades protected with oils germinated 1n 20 - 601/o. Oils from
`olive, com, Atpolan 80 EC and lkar 95 EC caused 1nh1bition of spore germination at
`least 1n 401/o . Whereas uredtospores from nontreated plants germinated in 86%. After
`7 days. urediospores collected from untreated plants germinated in 651¾, whereas from
`plants sprayed wtth tested oils 1n 23 - 68%. Oils from olive, sunflower and Dedal 90
`EC, Atpolan 80 EC were the most effective 1n suppressing uredtospores germination.
`
`Key words: Puccinia pelargontt-zonalts, pelargoniwn, oils, spore, germination, effec(cid:173)
`tiveness
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Pelargonium rust caused by Puccinia pelargonii-zonalis is one of the most
`frequent and serious diseases on pelargonium. The most effective control of
`the pathogen is possible by use of fungicides. In other experiments on the
`control of Puccinia pelargonU-zonalts, azoxystrobin, tebuconazole + triadime·
`fon, tebuconazole + tolylfluanide and triadimefon gave over 90% effectiveness
`in suppression of new uredta fonnation (Wojdyla 2004). Also, in the case of
`this ~ompounds all (azoxystrobtn) or majority of already present uredia were
`browned and destroyed. In the recent years, oils became popular as a new,
`plant protection agent with anti-vtrus (Ramadan et al. 1995) and antl•fungal
`activtty (McGrath and Shishkoff 2000, Wojdyla 2003). Oils can be used as an
`alternative to conventional fungicides, and become integrated into protection
`
`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`

`

`194
`
`programs including other products, thereby reducing the frequency of each
`product use and the risk of resistance to all fungicide groups in the program
`(Northover and Schneider 1996). Among others the prospect of using plant
`oils as fungicides is very appealing, because refined oils are now readily
`·available and they are safe for human consumption and commonly used in
`baked goods, salad dressings and deep-frying. Their use as natural alterna(cid:173)
`tive to synthetic fungicides would be especially attractive to home gardeners
`and producers of organically grown produce (Northover and Schneider 1996).
`In experiments, oils have proven to be effective against Altemaria solani (Ba(cid:173)
`bus et al. 2000), Botrytis cinerea (Bourbos et al. 1994, Wojdyla 2003). Diplo(cid:173)
`carpon rosae (Osnaya-Gonzales and Schlosser 1998), Venturia inaequalis
`(Northover and Schneider 1993). Oils had particularly good effectiveness
`against pathogens causing powdery mildew on different plant species (Clem(cid:173)
`ent et al. 1994. Wojdyla 2000, Wojdyla 2002). When.,,used curatively. some
`oils gave good control of pathogens causing rust on bean (Locke and Stave
`1992). wheat (Sajid et al. 1995. Zekaria-Orenet et al. 1991). willow (Wojdyla
`and Jankiewtci 2004). In the control of Puccinia menthae and P. dracuncu(cid:173)
`lina on Mentha x piperita the neem (Azadirachta indtca) oil applied with an
`adjuvant exhibited a fungicidal activity similar to that of the chemical control
`- propiconazole (D'Aulerio et al. 1988). Also Sajid et al. (1995) obtained good
`results when neem oil was applied as a spray against Puccinia recondita on
`wheat.
`The aim of research was to evaluate effectiveness of plant oils from com.
`olive, rape. soya and sunflower, oils recommended for plant protection
`(Dedal 90 EC, Olejan 80 EC) and mineral oils (Atpolan 80 EC, Ikar 95 EC.
`Olemix 84 EC and Promanal 60 EC) in the control of pelargonium rust.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`The following compounds were used in the experiments:
`
`Mineral oils: Atpolan 80 EC (76% SN oil) - produced by Agromix Nie(cid:173)
`polomtce Poland, lkar 95 EC (95% SAE petroleum oil) - produced by Dan(cid:173)
`mark Lodz Poland. Olemix 84 EC (84% DSA petroleum oil) - produced by
`Danmark Lodz Poland. Promanal 60 EC (60% petroleum oil) - produced by
`Neudorff
`Plant oils recommended for plant protection: Dedal 90 EC (90% vegetable
`oil) - produced by Danmark Lodz Poland. Olejan 80 EC (85% rape oil) - pro(cid:173)
`duced by Dan.mark Lodz Poland
`Plant olla used u a food: com oil (seeds). olive oil (fruits). rape oil (seeds).
`soya oil (seeds). and sunflower oil (seeds),
`Fungicide: Amistar 250 SC (250 g azoxystrobine/dm3) produced by Syn(cid:173)
`genta
`Surfactant: Terg1tol O"M) 15-S-9 produced by Dow Chemical C/O.
`The experiment was carried out on pelargonium cv. Pulsar Fl Salmon grown
`in pots on benches in a greenhouse. When the first disease symptoms (ured(cid:173)
`inia of fungus on the lower side of leaves) were noted, plants were sprayed 4
`times at 7 day intervals With tested oils at 1 o/o concentration (Table 1). Ct(cid:173)
`towett AL at concentration 0.02% was added to spray mtxture of Arnistar 250
`SC (standard). A special kind of surfactant recommended for plant oils -
`
`

`

`Comm. Appl. Biol. Sci, Ghent University, 70/3, 2005
`
`195
`
`Tergitol (TM) 15-S-9 at cone. 0.3% was added to suspensions of edible plant
`oils. The observation of severity of disease symptoms was conducted before
`treatment of plants and after 4 weeks of protection. During observation a
`number of uredia per leaf, diameter of uredia, percentage of diseased leaves
`and destroyed pustules were counted and height of plants was determined.
`After 1 or 2 weeks from the end of protection, spores from leaves were col(cid:173)
`lected and percentage of germinating spores was found using the same
`method as in the next experiment (Table 2}.
`In the next trial, plants of the same cultivar with visible· disease symptoms
`were sprayed with 1 % solution of tested compounds (Table 3). The experi(cid:173)
`ments were done during the summer time. One and 7 days after treatment
`leaves with visible disease symptoms were sampled. In the laboratory a drop(cid:173)
`let of sterilized water was put on the leaf surface and urediospores were
`scraped with razor blade into potato-dextrose agar (PDA) medium. A second
`droplet of water was added to the suspension of spores and than it was
`spread over the medium surface. For reduction of bacteria development, rose
`bengal 0.5 mg/dm3 and 80,000 units penicillin per dm3 were added to the
`medium. After 18 h of incubation at 18-20°C, total number of urediospores
`and number of germinating spores were counted in the observation field of
`light microscope at magnification of 125x. For counting. places with 30-60
`urediospores in the observation field were selected. In the case of high num(cid:173)
`ber of urediospores they were counted only from a half or 1 / 4 of observation
`field and next the percentage of germinating spores was calculated.
`The experiment was set in randomised block design witl) 4 replicates and
`each replicate consisted of 4 plants or plates of PDA.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`In the trial the results collected after 4 weeks revealed an average of about
`11 uredia per leaf on control plants (Table 1). At the same time, on plants
`protected with Ikar 95 EC, Olemi.x 84 EC, Olejan 85 EC. olive and soya oil
`significantly less pustules per leaf were found compared to control. There
`was not statistically significant difference in mean number of pustules on
`plants protected with Atpolan 80 EC. Promanal 60 EC, Dedal 90 EC, corn,
`rape and sunflower oil, ranging from 7.8 to 8 .5 pustules per leaf. On unpro(cid:173)
`tected plants no uredia were dried. On the leaves of plants protected with
`oils, from 11 to about 71 % of pustules were dried up. Out of the tested oils,
`the most effective in drying up of uredinia were Atpolan 80 EC, Ikar 95 EC,
`Olemix 84 EC, olive and soya oils where, on average, from 51 to about 71%
`of dried up uredia were noted. Average diameter of pustules on the leaves of
`control plants was ca. 3.6 mm. At the same time on plants protected with
`Dedal 90 EC, Olejan 85 EC and com oil diameter of pustules was from 4.5 to
`about 5.4 mm i.e. even more than on control plants. In the case of most of
`the tested oils diameter of spots was significantly lower than on control pe(cid:173)
`largonium plants. Except of Dedal 90 EC, no influence of the used oils on
`growth of plants was found. Also diameter of plants did not differ between
`control plants and ones protected with tested oils. Similarly, Picton and
`Hummer (2003) showed that mineral oil used for control of Cronatrium ribi(cid:173)
`cola on black current cultivars significantly reduced rust infection comparing
`to the unsprayed control.
`
`

`

`Table 1. Effectiveness of oils, applied curatively, in the control of Puccinia pelargonU(cid:173)
`zonalis on pelargonium. First spraying: 08.10.2004, (4 sprayings at 7 day intervals).
`
`196
`
`Treatments
`
`Cone. Mean num- % of dried up
`uredia
`ber of ure-
`in%
`dia/leaf
`.
`11.4 d
`0.1
`3.5ab
`
`O.Oa
`99.68 h
`
`51.4 ef
`58.7 lg
`70.7g
`11.0 b
`
`33.8 cd
`23.1 e
`
`Height of
`plants
`incm
`30.6ab
`30.Sab
`
`26.3a
`28.8 ab
`26.1 a
`30.9 ab
`
`39.Sc .
`34.6 be
`
`Diam. of
`plants
`incm
`29.2 a-e
`30.0 a-e
`
`26.9 ab
`26.1 a
`27.3 a-e
`31.4 e
`
`27.5 a-c
`31.0 be
`
`Diam.of
`spots
`inmm
`3.6e
`2.6ab
`
`2.5ab
`2.1 a
`2.4ab
`3.1 be
`
`5.4 d
`4.9 d
`
`Control
`Amistar 250 SC
`Mineral oils
`7.8cd
`1.0
`Alpolan80EC
`5.5 a-c
`1.0
`lkar95 EC
`1.6 a
`1.0
`Olemix84 EC
`8.5cd
`1.0
`Promanal 60 EC
`Plant oils recommended for olant orotection
`10.5 d
`Dedal90 EC
`1.0
`6.0be
`1.0
`Oleian 80 EC
`Plant oils used as a food
`, 33.4bc
`4.5d
`29.3 a-e
`40.5de
`8.3cd
`1.0
`Corn oil
`3.6c
`26.0a
`312 ab
`55.1 e-g
`5.5 a-c
`1.0
`Olive oil
`2.4ab
`27.7 a-c
`29.8 ab
`29.8 cd
`7.8cd
`1.0
`Rape oil
`2.4ab
`26.6 ab
`30.6 ab
`59.0fg
`3.3ab
`1.0
`Soya oil
`2.2 ab
`28.3 a-c
`342bc
`32.8 cd
`8.1 cd
`1.0
`Sunflower oil
`Note: Means, Within the column, followed by the same letter are not significantly dif(cid:173)
`ferent at p=0.05.
`
`Analysts of P. pelargonii-zonalts spore germination showed, that 7 days after
`the end of experiment. spores taken from control plants germinated in about
`98% (Table 2). At the same time spores taken from plants sprayed with oils
`germinated in about 86 to 96%. Statistically similar percentage of germi(cid:173)
`nated spores, to that in control. was found on pelargonium protected with
`Promanal 60 EC. Spores taken from plants sprayed with azoxystrobin (stan(cid:173)
`dard) genntnated only sporadically.
`Fourteen days after the last spraying, more than 83% of germinating uredio(cid:173)
`spores were found on control leaves (Table 2). At the same time spore col(cid:173)
`lected from protected plants genntnated in 1 7 to 71 % .' Among the tested
`products, oils from rape. corn, sunflower and Dedal 90 EC, lkar 95 EC,
`Olemix 84 EC were the most effective.
`One day after treatment. urediospores of P. pelargonti-zonalts collected from
`leaf blades protected with oils germinated in 20 to 61% (Table 3). Oils from
`olive, com and Atpolan 80 EC, Ikar 95 EC caused inhibition of spore germi(cid:173)
`nation by at lest 40%. On untreated leaves more than 86% of germinating
`spores were found. After 7 days urediospores collected from untreated plants
`germinated in 65% whereas from plants sprayed with the tested oils in 23 to
`68%. Oils from olive, sunflower and Dedal 90 EC, Atpolan 80 EC were the
`most effective in suppressing spores germination. Also Sajid et al. (1995) in
`the in vitro trials found that neem oil completely inhibited germination of
`urediniospores of P: recondite, while Letessier et al. (2001) showed that es(cid:173)
`sential oil of hyssop (Hyssopus oJftcinalts) reduced germination of uredinio(cid:173)
`spores of Uromyces vtciaefabae and rust infection of broad bean.
`Earlier experiments of Wojdyla (2003) showed that the oils tested in this trial
`strongly suppressed germination of Botrytts cinerea spores and germ tube
`development on roses.
`
`

`

`Comm. Appl. Biol. Sci, Ghent University, 70/3, 2005
`
`197
`
`Table 2. Effectiveness of oils tn the control of Puccinia pelargonii-zonalts on pelargo(cid:173)
`ruum: Percentage of germinating urediospores. First spraytng: 08.10.2004
`
`Treatments
`
`Cone. in% Days after the end
`of eXDeriment
`7
`14
`98.2 f
`82.9 j
`2.0a
`0.0a
`
`.
`0.1
`
`Control
`Amistar 250 SC
`Mineral oils
`90.4e
`1.0
`Atpolan 80 EC
`1.0
`89.6 be
`lkar95 EC
`90.Se
`1.0
`Olemix84 EC
`96.4 ef
`1.0
`Promanal 60 EC
`Plant oils recommended for olant orolection
`1.0
`Dedal90 EC
`95.0de
`Oleian 80 EC
`1.0
`95.Sde
`Plant oils used as a food
`23.Sbc
`86.3b
`Com oil
`1.0
`49.1 g
`93.4 cd
`Olive oil
`1.0
`17.2b
`95.Sde
`Rape oil
`1.0
`45.4 fg
`93.0 cd
`Soya oil
`1.0
`28.3 cd
`91.2 e
`Sunflower oil
`1.0
`Note: Means, within the column, followed by the same letter are not sigruflcantly dif(cid:173)
`ferent at p=0.05.
`
`55.0gh
`38.6 ef
`34.0de
`70.9 i
`
`34.7de
`60.0h
`
`Table 3. Effectiveness of oils tn the control of Puccinia pelargonU-zonalts on pelargo(cid:173)
`ruum: Percentage of genrunatlng urediospores.
`Mean values from 2 series - 22.11.2004 and 29.11.2004
`
`Treatments
`
`Cone. in% Days after sprayina
`1
`7
`.
`85.8e
`64.3be
`0.1
`2.7a
`14.6 a
`
`Kontrola
`Amistar 250SC
`Mineral oils
`Atpolan 80 EC
`20.0 ab
`1.0
`22.9 a-e
`1.0
`lkar95 EC
`59.9 de
`1.0
`Promanal 60 EC
`60.9de
`1.0
`Olemix84EC
`Plant oils recommended for plant protection
`1.0
`Olejan80EC
`54.2e-e
`Dedal90EC
`1.0
`40.7 b-d
`Plant oils used as a food
`68.1 e
`34.1 b-d
`Comoil
`1.0
`Olive oil
`23.6ab
`26.2 b-d
`1.0
`58.7bc
`Rape oil
`45.2b-d
`1.0
`55.2 c-e
`53.0a-c
`Soyao~
`1.0
`55.2 c-e
`39.8 a-c
`Sunflower oil
`1.0
`Note: Means, within the column, followed by the same letter are not signtllcantly dif(cid:173)
`ferent at p=0.05.
`
`38.8 a·e
`53.9 be
`57.7 be
`47.8 a-e
`
`59.0 be
`36.0a•e
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`Number of Puccinia pelargonii-zonalis uredia per leaf noted on plants pro(cid:173)
`tected with oils from olive, soya, Ikar 95 EC or Olemix 84 EC was reduced by
`at least 50% compared to nontreated plants.
`
`

`

`198
`
`Oils from olive, soya and additionally Atpolan 80 EC. lkar 95 EC, Olemix 84
`EC caused drying of more than 500/4 of uredia.
`One day after pelargonium spraying with oils, germination of urediniospores
`ranged from 20 to 60% as compared to 86% on untreated control plants.
`·111e tested oils we·re not phytotoxic to pelargonium.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`BABU s .. SEETHARAMAN K., NANDAKUMAR R. & JOHNSON I. (2000). Effect of selected
`extracts/oils against tomato leaf blight. International Journal of Tropical Agricul(cid:173)
`ture 18(2): 153-157.
`B0URB0S V.A., SK0UDRIDAKIS M.T .. HAITAS v.c. & FOTIADIS K.S. (1994). The possible
`control of Botrytts cinerea Pers. using paraffinic oils, Brtghton Crop Protection Con(cid:173)
`ference, Pest and Diseases (2):797-800.
`CLEMENT D.L., GILLS.A. & POTTS w. (1994). Alternatives for powdery mildew control on
`lilac. Journal of Arbortculture 20(4):227-230.
`D'AULERIO A.Z .. ZAMB0NELlJ A.. BIANCHI A .. CATELLANIA P.L. & BIFF1 B.S. (1998). Rust
`control trials · on Mentha x ptperita and Artemtsia dracunculus with natural prod·
`ucts. Proceedings of Giomate Fttopatologische, held at Scicli e Ragusa. Italy. from
`• 3-7 May 1998:667-670.
`LETESSIER M.P., SVOBODA K.P & WALTERS D .. (2001). Antifungal activity of the essential
`oU of hyssop (Hyssopus offlcinalis). Journal of Phytopathology 149(11-12):673-
`678.
`LocKE J.C. & SrAVE J.R. (1992). Efficacy of neem seed extraction products and two
`petroleum oils against bean rust. Fungic. Nemattcide Tests 47:76.
`MCGRATH M.T. & SHISHKOFF N. (2000). Control of cucurbit powdery mildew with JMS
`Style-Oil. Plant Disease 84(9):989-993.
`NORTHOVER J. & SCHNEIDER K.E. (1993). Activity of plant oils and diseases caused by
`Podosphaera leucotricha. Venturia inaequalis, and Albugo occidental.is. Plant Dis(cid:173)
`ease 77(2):152- 157.
`NORTHOVER J. & SCHNEIDER K.E. (1996). Physical modes of action of petroleum and
`plant oils on powdery and downy mildew of grapevines. Plant Disease 80(5):544-
`550.
`OSNAYA-G0NSALEZ M. & SCHLOSSER E. (1998). Effect of vegetable oils on black spot of
`roses. Med. Fae. Landbow. Univ. Gent 63(3b):995-998.
`PICTON D.D. & HUMMER K.E. (2003). Oil application reduces pine blister rust seventy
`in black currants. Small Fruits Review 2(1):43-49.
`RAMADAN N.A., AL-MALI.AH M.K. & KASsIM N.A. (1995). Control of lettuce mosaic dis(cid:173)
`eases by mineral oil. Arab Universities Journal of Agrtcultural Sciences 3(1):185-
`191.
`SAJID M.N., IHSAN J., NASIR M.A. & SHAKIR A.S. (1995). Comparative efficacy of neem
`products and Baytan against leaf rust of wheat. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathol(cid:173)
`ogy 7(1):71-75.
`WOJDYIA A.T. (2000). Influence of some compounds on development of Sphaerotheca
`pannosa var. rosae, J. Plant Protection Res. 40(2): 106-122.
`WQ.JDYIA A.T. (2002) . . Oils acttvtty in the control of rose powdery mildew. Med. Fae.
`Landbouw. Univ. Gent 63(3b):995-998.
`WQ.JDYIA A.T. (2003). Biological activity of plant and mineral oils in the control of
`Botrytis cinerea. Bull. Pol. Ac. 67(2):369-376.
`WOJDYl.A A.T. (2004). Pelargonium rust. OWK 14:32-33.
`WOJDYIA A.T., JANKIEWICZ D. (2004). Oils activity in the control of willow rust. Comm.
`App. Biol. Sci. Ghent University 69(4):695-705.
`ZEKARIA-OREN J., EYAL Z. & Zlv 0. (1991). Effect of film-forming compounds on the
`development ofleafrust on wheat seedlings. Plant Dis. 75:231-234.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket