throbber
Control of Powdery
`Mildew on Leaves
`and Stems of
`Gooseberry
`
`Deric D. Picton1 and
`Kim E. Hummer2
`
`ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. Ribes uva-
`crispa, Ribes grossularia, Sphaerotheca
`mors-uvae, efficacy, mineral oil,
`biological control, Trichoderma
`
`SUMMARY. Powdery mildew
`(Sphaerotheca mors-uvae ) severely
`infects young leaves and stems of
`gooseberry (Ribes uva-crispa )
`throughout the world. Environmen-
`tally friendly control measures are
`being sought as alternatives to sulfur
`or demethylation inhibiting fungi-
`cides. This study examined the effect
`of a mineral oil spray, the biological
`control agent Trichoderma harzianum
`Rifai strain T-22 (Trichoderma), a
`combination mineral oil +
`Tricoderma, and the chemical fungi-
`cide thiophanate, on powdery mildew
`severity in ‘Industry,’ a susceptible
`gooseberry. Mineral oil at 8 mL·L–1
`(1.0 fl oz/gal), Tricoderma at 4 g·L–1
`(0.5 oz/gal) and thiophanate at 1.45
`mL·L–1 (0.186 fl oz/gal), and mineral
`oil + Tricoderma mix was applied to
`plants until runoff at 2-week intervals
`from February 2002 through April
`2002, on potted ‘Industry’ plants
`growing in a greenhouse in U. S.
`Department of Agriculture, Agricul-
`tural Research Service, National
`Clonal Germplasm Repository
`(NCGR), Corvallis, Ore. The percent
`of infected leaves per plant were
`calculated and the percent of infected
`stem surface areas were visually rated
`in mid-April. The fungicide, mineral
`oil, and mineral oil + Tricoderma
`treatment applications significantly
`reduced powdery mildew severity in
`
`The use of trade names does not imply endorsement of
`the products named nor criticism of similar ones not
`named. We acknowledge the Northwest Center for
`Small Fruits Research and CRIS 5358-21000-029-
`00D for providing funding support for this project.
`
`1Graduate research assistant, Department of Horticul-
`ture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon,
`97330. Present address: BARC-West, Floral and Nurs-
`ery Plants Research Unit, 10300 Baltimore, Ave. Bldg
`010A Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350.
`
`2Research leader, USDA ARS NCGR, 33447 Peoria
`Road, Corvallis, Oregon 97333-2521; to whom corre-
`spondence should be addressed; e-mail khummer@ars-
`grin.gov.
`
`365
`
`Fig. 4. Medium leachate analysis for pH and electrical conductivity (EC) in 1998.
`
`quirements. There was a sharp decrease
`in irrigation required from August to
`October with decreasing temperatures.
`Yeager (1998) reported that moni-
`toring both water use and discharge is
`essential in identifying water requirements
`and accumulation of soluble salts during
`times of inadequate rainfall. Effluent analysis
`during the month of August in this study
`determined nutrients (N, Phosphorus, Po-
`tassium, Calcium, Magnesium) were at
`acceptable levels and pH (7.8) at slightly
`higher than recommended (Fig. 3 and 4).
`Below normal rainfall high temperatures,
`and water evaporation may have been
`responsible for increased leachate electro
`conductivity (EC) and pH measurements
`(Fig. 4). Additional irrigation was required
`to leach accumulated salts.
`The closed capture system could be
`used as an objective nursery irrigation
`management tool providing data to
`make informed decisions. Yearly accu-
`mulated data could eventually be trans-
`formed into an irrigation model for each
`species, media, and climate. Previous
`research has shown that effluent based
`irrigation could reduce fertilizer and
`irrigation requirements (Davis, et al.,
`2001). Monthly monitoring reports
`could provide adequate data for manag-
`ing irrigation; as well as, monitoring
`nutrient availability and leaching.
`
`Literature cited
`Beeson, Jr., R.C. and G.W. Knox. 1991. Analysis
`of efficiency of overhead irrigation in container
`production. HortScience 26(7):848–850.
`
`Davis, M.K., E.W. Bush, and J.S. Kuehny. 2001.
`The effects of leaching fraction and fertilizer
`concentration on Euphorbia pulcherrima ‘Free-
`dom Red’. Proc. S. Nursery Assn. Res. Conf.
`46:140–143.
`
`Fain, D.C., Tilt, K.M., C.H. Gilliam, H.G. Pon-
`der, and J. L. Sibley. 1999. Cyclic irrigation
`improves irrigation application efficiency and
`growth of sawtooth oak. J. Arboricult. 25:200–
`204.
`
`Fare, D.C., C.H. Gilliam, G.J. Keever, and J.W.
`Olive. 1994. Irrigation reduces container leachate
`nitrate-nitrogen concentration. HortScience
`29(12):1514–1517.
`
`Mason, J. 1994. Nursery management. Kanga-
`roo Press, Kenthurst, Australia.
`
`Niemiera, A.X. and C.E. Leda. 1993. Nitrogen
`leaching from osmocote-fertilized pine bark at
`leaching fractions of 0 to 0.4. J. Environ. Hort.
`11:75–77.
`
`Yeager, T.H., C.H. Gilliam, T.E. Bilderback,
`D.C. Fare, A.X. Niemiera, and K.M. Tilt. 1997.
`Best management practices guide for producing
`container-grown plants. S. Nursery Assn.,
`Marietta, Ga.
`
`Yeager, T.H. 1998. Water sample collection pro-
`cedures for container nurseries. Proc. S. Nursery
`Assn. Res. Conf. 43:526–528.
`
`● April–June 2003 13(2)
`
`

`

`TECHNOLOGY & PRODUCT REPORTS
`
`both leaves and stems as compared
`with those of the unsprayed plants.
`The stem powdery mildew reduction
`levels of the mineral oil or a combina-
`tion of mineral oil + Trichoderma
`treatments, were not statistically
`different than that of thiophanate,
`which is reported as commercially
`acceptable. We recommend mineral oil
`spray, or mineral oil + Tricoderma, as
`alternatives to fungicide control of
`powdery mildew on leaves and stems
`of young gooseberry plants.
`
`P owdery mildew is a spring
`
`and summer disease of
`gooseberries in Asia, Europe,
`North America, Australia, and New
`Zealand (Diekmann et al., 1994). This
`disease can be severe in the rainy, mild
`climate of the Pacific northwestern
`United States. The fungus appears as a
`white powdery growth on the young
`leaf and stem surfaces and can cause
`stunting and a reduction in marketable
`fruit (Pscheit, 2002).
`Control recommendations for
`powdery mildew in fruit crops include
`inorganic sulfur in dust or wettable for-
`mulations, and demethylation-inhibi-
`tor fungicides (Dell et al., 1998; Pscheidt,
`2002). A biological control containing
`the fungal hyperparasite Ampelomyces
`quisqualis in a mineral-oil-based surfac-
`tant is a mildew preventative (Pscheidt,
`2002). Trichoderma harzianum isolates
`can control foliar and soilborne fungi
`including Botrytis cinerea, Pseudopero-
`nospora cubensis, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
`and Sphaerotheca spp. (Elad, 2000;
`Scheuerell and Mahaffee, 2000). The
`organism has multiple modes of action
`that inhibit or kill the pathogen (Elad,
`2000). These organisms may not pro-
`vide commercially accepted control with
`present formulations.
`Mineral oil has proven effective in
`controlling powdery mildew on grapes
`(Vitis vinifera) (Dell et al., 1998), roses
`(Rosa spp.)(McWhorter, 1927) and
`hops (Humulus lupulus) (Pscheidt,
`2002). Oil is effective in low concentra-
`tions, has little or no toxicity to animals,
`and is relatively inexpensive (Dell et al.,
`1998). Mineral oil was effective in re-
`ducing mildew infection in black cur-
`rants (Ribes nigrum) (Hummer and
`Picton, 2001) and in reducing white
`pine blister rust (caused by Cronartium
`ribicola) on Ribes (Picton and Hum-
`mer, 2003). Calpouzos (1966) men-
`tions two disadvantages: that oil may
`not be effective against some of plant
`diseases, and that it may cause phyto-
`
`366
`
`toxicity. The object of this study was to
`determine if mineral oil, Tricoderma, or
`a combination of mineral oil +
`Tricoderma, could reduce powdery mil-
`dew on leaves and stems of susceptible
`gooseberries in contrast with control
`from the recommended commercial
`fungicide, thiophanate.
`
`Materials and methods
`‘Industry’ was chosen for this study
`based on preliminary observations of
`naturally occurring powdery mildew in
`the cultivated gooseberries at NCGR-
`Corvallis. ‘Industry’ is highly suscep-
`tible to powdery mildew (Brennan,
`1996). In January 2002, ‘Industry’
`plants were placed in the greenhouse in
`Corvallis, Ore., in a completely ran-
`domized design with four replicates of
`five treatments with a total of 20 plants.
`This study was conducted on 2-year-old
`plants that had not reached full fruiting
`capacity.
`The treatments were applied at 2-
`week intervals from February 2002
`through April 2002. They included an
`unsprayed control, mineral oil (JMS
`Stylet Oil; JMS Flowers Farms, Inc.,
`Vero Beach, Fla.), Tricoderma
`(Plantshield; Bioworks Inc., Geneva,
`N.Y.), thiophanate (Cleary 3336; W.A.
`
`Cleary Chem. Co., Summerset, N.J.),
`and a combination of mineral oil +
`Tricoderma. JMS Stylet-Oil, a highly
`refined paraffinic mineral oil with an
`unsulfonated residue of 99.1%, was
`sprayed on treated leaves until runoff at
`8 mL·L–1. PlantShield, a biologically
`active formulation of Trichoderma
`harzianum strain T-22 in a clay sub-
`strate, was applied at a rate of 4 g·L–1.
`Thiophanate, the recommended chemi-
`cal control of mildew on gooseberries
`(Pscheit, 2002), was applied at 1.45
`g·L–1. The mineral oil + Tricoderma
`treatment was applied mixed at the same
`rates as above. All sprays were applied
`using a handheld 1.51-L (0.4-gal)
`sprayer.
`In mid-April, the powdery mildew
`infection of leaves and stems on current
`year’s growth was visually assessed by
`observing the undersides of the leaves.
`Infected and total leaves of the plant
`were counted, and the percent of in-
`fected leaves per plant was calculated.
`Young, green stems were also rated for
`mildew damage and a percent infection
`rating was given per plant. The leaf and
`stem surface area covered by fungal
`infection was visually rated by estimat-
`ing the percent of the leaf surface show-
`ing mildew damage on a whole plant
`
`Fig. 1. Mean powdery mildew severity rating for leaves (percent infected leaves
`per plant) and stems (estimated percent area covered by infection), n = 4, for
`five treatments on ‘Industry’gooseberry: 1) no spray, 2) Trichoderma
`harzianum strain T-22 in a clay substrate (Tricoderma) (Plantshield; Bioworks
`Inc., Geneva, N.Y.) at 4 g·L–1 (0.5 oz/gal), 3) mineral oil (JMS Stylet Oil; JMS
`Flowers Farms, Inc., Vero Beach, Fla) at 8 mL·L–1 (1.0 fl oz/gal) + Tricoderma
`at 4 g·L–1, 4) mineral oil at 8 mL·L–1, and 5) thiophanate (Cleary 3336; W.A.
`Cleary Chem. Co., Summerset, N.J.) at 1.45 g·L–1 (0.186 fl oz/gal) applied at 2-
`week intervals from Feb. 2002 through Apr. 2002. Disease severity ratings were
`taken on 21 Apr. 2002. Standard deviation = 0 for the mean thiophanate rating.
`
`● April–June 2003 13(2)
`
`

`

`Literature cited
`Brennan, R.M. 1996. Currants and goose-
`berries, p. 191–295. In: J. Janick and J.N.
`Moore (eds.). Fruit breeding. vol. 2. Wiley,
`New York.
`
`Calpouzos, L. 1966. Action of oil in the
`control of plant disease. Ann. Rev.
`Phytopathol. 4:369–390.
`
`Dell, K.J., W.D. Gubler, R. Krueger, M.
`Sanger, and L.J. Bettiga. 1998. The effi-
`cacy of JMS stylet-oil on grape powdery
`mildew and Botrytis bunch rot and effects
`on fermentation. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic.
`49:11–16.
`
`Diekmann, M., E.A. Frison, and T. Putter
`(eds.). 1994. FAO/IPGRI Technical
`Guidelines for the safe movement of small
`fruit germplasm. Food Agr. Org. United
`Nations, Rome/Intl. Plant Genet. Resour.
`Inst., Rome.
`
`Elad Y. 2000. Biological control of foliar
`pathogens by means of Trichoderma
`harzianum and potential modes of action.
`Crop Protection 19:709–714.
`
`Hummer, K.E. and D. D. Picton. 2001.
`Oil application reduces powdery mildew
`severity in black and red currants.
`HortTechnology 11:445–446.
`
`McWhorter. 1927. Fungicidal value of oil
`sprays. Phytopathology 17:201–202.
`
`Picton, D.D. and K.E. Hummer. 2003.
`Oil application reduces white pine blister
`rust severity in black currants. Small Fruit
`Rev. 2(1):43–49.
`
`Pscheit, J.W. 2002. Gooseberry and cur-
`rant—Powdery mildew. In: Online guide
`to plant disease control. 25 June 2002.
`h t t p : / / p l a n t - d i s e a s e . o r s t . e d u /
`disease.cfm?RecordID=512.
`
`Scheuerell S.J. and W.F. Mahaffee. 2000.
`Assessing aerated and non-aerated watery
`fermented compost and Trichoderma
`harzianum T-22 for control of powdery
`mildew (Sphaerotheca pannosa var. rosae)
`of Rose in the Willamette Valley, Oregon.
`Phytopathology. 90(6 Supp.):S69.
`
`basis. Analyses of variance were ap-
`plied to the percentages and ratings to
`determine significance of the treat-
`ments. Tukey’s least square difference
`(LSD) test was applied to separate means.
`
`Results and discussion
`Analyses of variance for ratings on
`both leaves and stems were highly
`significant (P < 0.0001). All treat-
`ments were significantly better than
`the no-spray control for stem infection
`(Fig. 1). Thiophanate, mineral oil, or
`the mineral oil + Tricoderma treat-
`ments gave the best control (P = 0.05)
`for stem infection. For leaf infection,
`the thiophanate and the mineral oil
`treatments were significantly more ef-
`fective at reducing powdery mildew
`than was Tricoderma alone or the no
`spray control (Fig. 1). The combina-
`tion treatment was intermediate, pro-
`viding significantly less control than
`the fungicide treatment but not sig-
`nificantly less than the oil treatment
`(Fig. 1). These results agree with pre-
`vious studies for disease control using
`mineral oil (Hummer and Picton,
`2001; Scheuerell and Mahaffee, 2000).
`The lack of powdery mildew control
`on leaves for mineral oil + Tricoderma
`may be due to an interaction between
`a component of the biological control
`and the oil that reduced the coating
`capacity of the oil on the leaf.
`Tricoderma alone did not significantly
`reduce leaf infection (Fig. 1). Unfor-
`tunately, in this treatment we observed
`an increased level of leaf necrosis not
`caused by mildew. This damage was
`not observed in the other treatments.
`The damage appeared in the same
`vicinity as the mildew area. We do not
`recommend Tricoderma alone to con-
`trol powdery mildew on gooseberries.
`The powdery mildew reduction
`of the mineral oil or the combination
`of mineral oil + Tricoderma treatments
`were not statistically different than that
`of the thiophanate, which is reported
`as commercially acceptable. We rec-
`ommend the application of mineral oil
`or mineral oil + Tricoderma, as alterna-
`tives to fungicide in reducing powdery
`mildew in leaves and stems of young,
`greenhouse-grown gooseberry plants.
`Further study is needed to determine
`effective controls of gooseberry fruit
`mildew using environmentally friendly
`materials.
`
`● April–June 2003 13(2)
`
`367
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket