throbber
Trials
`Krumplitsch, Susan; Trials
`Harwood, Melissa; 334PGR@mcandrews-ip.com; Brad P. Loren; bmahon@mcandrews-ip.com;
`amenchaca@mcandrews-ip.com
`RE: PGR2023-00043, Intas Pharm. Ltd. v. Atossa Therapeutics, Inc.
`Wednesday, September 4, 2024 4:28:06 PM
`image001.png
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Counsel:
`
`From the Board –
`
`Patent Owner’s unopposed request for authorization to file a supplemental declaration of Dr. Davies
`with its Sur-Reply is granted. Dr. Davies’s supplemental declaration shall be limited to responding to
`Petitioner’s enablement argument, as agreed upon by the parties.
`
`Petitioner is also authorized to file the cross-examination transcript as an exhibit as soon as it
`becomes available and to file observations no later than 10 business days after the cross-
`examination of Dr. Davies, if it so chooses (given the schedule, however, the Board encourages
`Petitioner to file the observations as soon as possible). Observations must be a concise statement of
`the relevance of the testimony and are not an opportunity to raise new issues or re-argue issues.
`Observations should identify by page and line number the relevant testimony of the witness, identify
`what specific argument (i.e., by paper number and pincite) that the testimony responds to, and
`include a very short one to two sentence statement of why that testimony is relevant.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Krumplitsch, Susan <Susan.Krumplitsch@us.dlapiper.com>
`Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 3:16 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Harwood, Melissa <Melissa.Harwood@us.dlapiper.com>; Krumplitsch, Susan
`<Susan.Krumplitsch@us.dlapiper.com>; 334PGR@mcandrews-ip.com; Brad P. Loren
`<BLoren@mcandrews-ip.com>; bmahon@mcandrews-ip.com; amenchaca@mcandrews-ip.com
`Subject: PGR2023-00043, Intas Pharm. Ltd. v. Atossa Therapeutics, Inc.
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`In PGR2023-00043, Patent Owner requests authorization to include a supplemental declaration from
`Patent Owner’s expert, Dr. Davies, as an exhibit to Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply, limited to responding
`to enablement opinions offered by Petitioner’s expert.
`
`Exhibit 3001
`
`

`

`
`Petitioner’s Reply included an Expert Declaration of Ron Bihovsky, PhD (Ex. 1030) responding to
`the opinions raised by Patent Owner’s expert in support of Patent Owner’s Response that the prior
`art reference relied on was not enabled. Patent Owner’s expert has therefore not had an opportunity
`to respond to the enablement opinions raised in Dr. Bihovsky’s declaration.
`
`The parties have conferred. Petitioner does not oppose Patent Owner’s request to submit a
`supplemental declaration from Dr. Davies as an exhibit to Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply provided that
`Petitioner be permitted to depose Dr. Davies and submit his transcript into the record and provide
`observations, if necessary. Patent Owner does not object to Petitioner’s request to make Dr. Davies
`available for deposition regarding his opinions contained in his supplemental declaration.
`
`In addition, Patent Owner requests an extension to Due Date 3, from August 28, 2024 to September
`6, 2024. No other dates in the schedule would be impacted.
`
`Petitioner does not oppose Patent Owner’s request to move Due Date 3 to September 6, 2024.
`
`The parties are available for a conference call at the Board’s request.
`
`Kind regards,
`
`Susan Krumplitsch
`
`
` Susan Krumplitsch
`
`Partner
`
`T +1 650 833 2440
`F +1 650 687 1230
`susan.krumplitsch@us.dlapiper.com
`
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`
`
`The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use
`of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
`unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its
`contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy
`all copies of the message. To contact us directly, send to postmaster@dlapiper.com. Thank you.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket