throbber
WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`7
`
`Figure 2 Repertoire complexity and antigen binding capacity of camel IgG15 IgG2
`and IgG3 analysed by radioimmunoprecipitation (A) or Western blotting
`(B & C).
`Serum or purified IgG fractions from healthy or Trypanoma evansi
`(A)
`infected C. dromedarius (CATT titer 1/160 (7)) were incubated with labelled
`trypanosome lysate, recovered with Protein A Sepharose and analysed by SDS-
`PAGE. The relative counts recovered are inscribed below each lane. No
`trypanosome proteins bind to the Protein A or to the healthy camel
`immunoglobulins.
`20 pg of IgGj, IgG, and IgG3 from healthy and trypanosome
`(B)
`infected animals were separated by SDS-PAGE without prior reduction or heating.
`The electroblotted proteins were incubated with the labelled trypanosome lysate.
`The IgG2 shows a single antigen binding component corresponding to the heavy
`chain immunoglobulin whereas the IgG3 fraction appears to contain in addition two
`larger antigen binding components barely detectable by Ponceau Red staining (C).
`These are possibly Ig classes copurified as immunocomplexes present in the serum
`of the infected animals.
`
`METHODS. (35S)-methionine labelled Trypanosoma evansi lysate (500,000 counts)
`(22) was incubated (4°C, 1 hour) with 10 pl of serum or, 20 pg of IgG15 IgG2 or IgG3
`in 200 pl of 0.4 M NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris (pH 8.3), containing 0.1 M
`TLCK. 10 mg of Protein A SeDharose suspended in 200 pl of the same buffer was
`added (4°C, 1 hour). After washing and centrifugation, each pellet was resuspended
`in 75 pl SDS PAGE sample solution containing DTT, and heated for 3 min. at
`100°C. After centrifugation, 5 pl of the supernatant was saved for radioactivity
`counting and the remainder analysed by SDS PAGE and fluorography.
`The nitrocellullose filter of the Western blot of purified fractions IgG)5 IgG, apd
`IgG3 was stained with Ponceau Red (C) or incubated with 1% ovalbumin in TST
`buffer (Tris 10 mM, NaCl 150 mM, Tween 0,05%) (B). The membrane was
`extensively washed with TST buffer and incubated for 2 hours with (35S)-labelled
`trypanosome antigen. To avoid unspecific binding, the labelled trypanosome antigen
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 663 of 1663
`
`KELONIA EXHIBIT 1004 (Part 2 of 3)
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`8
`
`lysate was filtered (45 p) and incubated with healthy camel immunoglobulin and
`ovalbumin adsorbed on a nitrocellulose membrane.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Figure 3 Amino acid sequences of the Vn framework, and hinge/Cn2 of Camelus
`dromedarius heavy chain immunoglobulins, compared to human (italic) VH
`framework (subgroup III) and hinges of human IgG (14).
`METHODS. Total RNA was isolated from a dromedary spleen (23). mRNA was
`purified with oligo T-paramagnetic beads (PolyATract-Promega). 1 pg mRNA was
`used for preparing double-strand cDNA (23) after an oligo-dT priming using
`enzymes provided by Boehringer Mannheim. 5 pg of cDNA was amplified by PCR
`in a 100 pl reaction mixture (WmM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 50 mM KC1,15 mM MgCl2,
`0.01% (w/v) gelatine, 200 pM of each dNTP). 25 pmoles of each oligonucleotide of
`the mouse VH (24), containing a Xhol site, and 5'-CGCCATCAAGGTACCAGT-
`TGA-3' (see SEQ. ID. NO: 3) were used as primers. The 3' end primer was deduced
`from partial sequences corresponding to y chain amino acid 296 to 288
`(T.Atarhouch, C..Hamers-Casterman, G. Robinson, private communication) in which
`one mismatch was introduced to create a KDnl restriction site. After a round of
`denaturing annealing (94°C for 5 min. and 54°C for 5 min.), 2 U of Taq DNA
`polymerase were added, to the reaction mixture before subjecting it to 35 cycles of
`amplification (5). The PCR products were purified by phenol-chloroform extraction
`followed by HPLC (Genpak-fax column, Waters) and finally by MERMAID (BIO
`101, Inc.). After these purification steps, the amplified cDNA was digested with
`Xhol and Kpnl, and ligated into pBluescript.
`The clones were sequenced by the dideoxy chain termination method (25). The
`sequences were translated into amino acids which allowed their assignment to well
`defined domains of the Ig molecule (14); see SEO. ID. NO: 4-12
`
`Figure 4 Schematic representation of the structural organisation of the camel
`immunoglobulins (adapted from 26).
`On the basis of size consideration, the IgG! fraction possess probably the normal
`antibody assembly of two light and two heavy chains. IgG3 would have a hinge
`comparable in size to the human IgG|t IgG, and IgG^. The two antigen binding sites
`
`Page 664 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`9
`
`are much closer to each other as this camel IgG lacks the CB1 domain. In the camel
`IgG, the long hinge, being formed of Pro-X repeats (X = Glu, Gin or Lys), most
`likely adopt a rigid structure (19,20). This long hinge could therefore substitute the
`CH1 domain and bring the two antigen binding sites of IgG, to normal positions.
`— End of Draft publication —
`
`Background of the invention
`Already at a very early stage during evolution antibodies have been developed to
`protect the host organisms against invading molecules or organisms. Most likely one
`of the earliest forms of antibodies must have been developed in Agnatha. In these
`primitive fishes antibodies of the IgM type consisting of heavy and lights chains have
`been detected. Also in many other forms of life ranging from amphibians to
`mammals antibodies are characterized by the feature that they consist of two heavy
`and two light chains, although the heavy chains of the various classes of
`immunoglobulins are quite different. These heavy and light chains interact with each
`other by a number of different physical forces, but interactions between hydrophobic
`patches present on both the heavy and light chain are always important. The interac¬
`tion between heavy and light chains exposes the complementarity determining
`regions (CDRs) of both chains in such a way that the immunoglobulin can bind the
`antigen optimally. Although individual heavy or light chains have also the capability
`to bind antigens (Ward et al., Nature 341 (1989) 544-546 = ref. 5 of the above given
`draft publication) this binding is in general much less strong than that of combined
`heavy and light chains.
`Heavy and light chains are composed of constant and variable domains. In the
`organisms producing immunoglobulins in their natural state the constant domains
`are very important for a number of functions, but for many applications of
`antibodies in industrial processes and products their variable domains are sufficient.
`Consequently many methods have been described to produce antibody fragments.
`
`One of these methods is characterized by cleavage of the antibodies with proteolytic
`enzymes like papain and pepsin resulting in (a) antibody fragment comprising a light
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 665 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`10
`
`chain bound via an S-S bridge to part of a corresponding heavy chain formed by
`proteolytic cleavage of the heavy chain (Fab), or (b) a larger fragment of the
`antibody comprising two of these Fabs still connected to each other via an S-S
`bridge in enlargements of the heavy chain parts, indicated with F(ab)„ respectively
`(see patent applications EP-A-0125023 (GENENTECH / Cabilly et al., 1984) and
`WO-A-93/02198 (TECH. RES. CENT. FINLAND / Teeri et al., 1993) for defini¬
`tions of these abbreviations). The disadvantage of the enzymatic route is that the
`production of whole antibodies is expensive and the enzymatic processing increases
`the costs of these fragments even more. The high costs of antibody fragments block
`the application of these fragments in processes and products outside the
`pharmaceutical industry'.
`
`Another method is based on linkage on DNA level of the genes encoding (parts of)
`the heavy chain and the light chain. This linkage and the subsequent production of
`these chimeric immunoglobulins in microorganisms have been described (for Fab
`fragments see e.g, Better et al., Science 240 (1988) 1041-1043, for Fv fragments
`(combination of variable fragments of the heavy chain (VH) and light chain (VjJ still
`connected to each other by non-covalent binding interactions) see e.g. Skerra et aL,
`Science 240 (1988) 1938, and for single chain Fv fragments (ScFv; an Fv fragment in
`which the two variable fragments are linked to each other by a linker peptide) see
`e.g. Bird et al., Science 242 (1988) 423-426. Provided that an appropriate signal
`sequence has been placed in front of the single chain VH and VL antibody fragment
`(ScFv), these products are translocated in E. coli into the periplasmic space and can
`be isolated and activated using quite elaborate and costly procedures. Moreover the
`application of antibody fragments produced by E. coli in consumer products requires
`extensive purification processes to remove pyrogenic factors originating from E. coli.
`For this and other reasons the production of ScFv in microorganisms that are
`normally used in the fermentation industry, like prokaryotes as Streptomyces or
`Bacillus (see e.g. Wu et al. Bio/Technology 11 (1993) 71) or yeasts belonging to the
`genera Saccharomyces (Teeri et al., 1993, supra), Kluyveromyces, Hansenula, or Pichia
`or moulds belonging to the genera Aspergillus or Trichodenna is preferred. However
`with a very few exceptions the production of ScFv antibodies using these systems
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 666 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`11
`
`proved to be impossible or quite poor. Although the exact reasons for the poor
`production are not well known, the use of linkers between the Vn and VL chains not
`designed for secretion (Teeri et al., 1993, supra) may be a reason.
`
`Another reason may be incorrect folding of ScFv. The frameworks and to a limited
`extend the CDRs of variable domains of light and heavy chains interact with each
`other. It has been described by Chothia et al. (J. Mol. Biol. 186 (1985) 651-663 =
`ref. 13 of the above given draft publication) that this interaction involves amino
`acids at the following positions of the variable region of the heavy chain: 35, 37, 39,
`44-45, 47, 100-103 and 105 (numbering according to Kabat et al, In "Sequences of
`Proteins of Immunological Interest, Public Health Service, NIH, Washington DC,
`1983 = ref. 14 of the above given draft publication). Especially leucine at position
`45 is strongly conserved and the whole apolar side chain of this amino acid seems to
`be involved in the interaction with the light chain. These strong interactions may
`fold the ScFv into a structure that can not be translocated in certain types of lower
`eukaryotes.
`
`Thus the use of a linker in the production of ScFv for connecting a VH chain to a VL
`chain, might negatively influence either the translocation, or the folding of such ScFv
`or both.
`
`Not prior-published European patent application 92402326.0 filed 21.08.92 (C.
`Casterman & R. Hamers) discloses the isolation of new animal-derived immuno¬
`globulins devoid of light chains (also indicated as heavy chain immunoglobulins),
`which can especially originate from animals of the camelid family (Camelidae). This
`European patent specification, now publicly available as EP-A1-0 584 421, is incor¬
`porated herein by reference. These heavy chain immunoglobulins are characterized
`in that they comprise two heavy polypeptide chains sufficient for the formation of
`one or more complete antigen binding sites, whereby a complete antigen binding
`site means a site which will alone allow the recognition and complete binding of an
`antigen, which can be verified by any known method regarding the testing of the
`binding affinity. The European patent specification further discloses methods for
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 667 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`12
`
`isolating these heavy chain immunoglobulins from the serum of Camelidae and
`details of the chemical structure of these heavy chain immunoglobulins. It also indi¬
`cates that these heavy chain immunoglobulins and derivatives thereof can be made
`by using recombinant DNA technology in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The
`present invention relates to a further development of the work disclosed in that
`prior-filed but not prior-published European specification.
`
`Due to the absence of light chains in most of the immunoglobulins of Camelidae
`such linkers are not necessary, thereby avoiding the above-mentioned potential
`problems.
`As described above in the draft publication for Nature, now publicly available as
`Nature 363 (3 June 1993) 446-448, and in the not prior-published European patent
`application 92402326.0 (supra) it was surprisingly found that the majority of the
`protein A-binding immunoglobulins of Camelidae consists just of two heavy chains
`and that these heavy chains are quite different from common forms of heavy chains,
`as the CH1 domain is replaced by a long or short hinge (indicated for IgG2 and IgG3,
`respectively, in Figure 4 of the above given draft publication for Nature).
`Moreover these heavy chains have a number of other features that make them
`remarkably different from the heavy chains of common immunoglobulins.
`One of the most significant features is that they contain quite different amino acid
`residues at those positions involved in binding to the light chain, which amino acids
`are highly conserved in common immunoglobulins consisting of two heavy and two
`light chains (see Table 1 and SEO. ID. NO: 13-31).
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`Page 668 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`Table 1
`Comparison af ainino acid sequences of various immunoglobulins
`Alignment of a number of V,, regions of Camel heavy chain antibodies compared
`with those of mouse (M, top line) and human (H, second line). Framework
`fragments are indicated in capitals, CDR fragments in small print; see SEQ. ID.
`NO: 13-31 for sequences indicated by M, H, 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,
`21, 24, 25, 27, 29, respectively.
`
`m
`EVKLVESGGG LVQPGGSLRL SCATSGFTFS dfyme..WVR QPPGRRLEWI
`EVQLVESGGG LVQPGGSLRL SCAASGFTFS syams..WVR QAPGRGLEWV
`h
`GG SVQAGGSLRL SCAASGYSNC pltWS..WYR QFPGTEREFV
`caml
`cam2 DVQLVASGGG SVQAGGSLRL SCTASGDSFS rfams..WFR QAPGKECELV
`GG SVQTGGSLRL SCAVSGFSFS tscma..WFR QASGRQREGV
`cam3
`GG SVQGGGSLRL SCAISGYTYG sfcmg..WFR EGPGREREGI
`cam7
`GG SVQAGGSLTL SCVYTNDTGT ...mg..WFR QAPGRECERV
`cam9
`GG SVQAGGSLRL SCNVSGSPSS tyclg..WFR QAPGREREGV
`camll
`GG SVEAGGSLRL SCTASGYVSS ...ma..WFR QVPGQEREGV
`caml3
`GG SAQAGGSLRL SCAAHGIPLN gyyia..WFR QAPGRGREGV
`caml6
`GG SVQPGGSLTL SCTVSGATYS dysig..WIR QAPGRDREW
`caml7
`GG SVQAGGSLRL SCTGSGFPYS tfcig..WFR QAPGREREGV
`caml8
`GG SVQAGGSLRL SCAASDYTIT dycma..WFR QAPGRERELV
`caml9
`..GG SVQVGGSLRL SCVASTHTDS stcig..WFR QAPGREREGV
`cam20
`..GG SVQVGGSLRL SCRISGGTPD rvpkslaWFR QAPEREREGI
`cam21
`..GG SVQAGGSLRL SCNVSGSPSS tyclg..WFR QAPGREREGV
`cam24
`.-GG SVQTGGSLRL SCEISGLTFD dsdvg..WYR QAPGDECRLV
`cam25
`..GG SVQAGGSLRL SCASSSRYMP ctydmt.WYR QAPGREREFV
`cam27
`exxGG SVQAGGSLRL SCVASGFNFE tsrma..WYR QTPGNVCELV
`cam29
`
`100
`m
`A..asrnkan dytteysasv kgRFIVSRDT SQSILYLQMN ALRAEDTAIY
`h S..xisxktd ggxtyyadsv kgRFTISRDN SRNTLYLQMN SLRAEDTAVY
`caml S..smd...p dgntkytysv kgRFTMSRGS TEYTVFLQMD NLRPEDTAMY
`cam2 S..siq
`s ngrtteadsv qgRFTISRDN SRNTVYLQMN SLRPEDTAVY
`Aainsgggrt yyntyvaesv kgRFAISQDN ARTTVYLDMN NLTPEDTATY
`cam3
`A..tiln..g gtntyyadsv kgRFTISQDS TLRTMYLLMN NLRPEDTGTY
`cam7
`A..hit...p dgmtfidepv kgRFTISRDN AQRTLSLRMN SLRPEDTAVY
`cam9
`camll T..aint..d gsiiyaadsv kgRFTISQDT ARETVHLQMN NLQPEDTATY
`A..fvqt..a dnsalygdsv kgRFTISRDN ARNTLYLQMR NLQPDDTGVY
`caml3
`A..ting..g rdvtyyadsv tgRFTISRDS PKNTVYLQMN SLRPEDTAIY
`caml6
`A..aant..g atskfyvdfv kgRFTISQDN AKNTVYLQMS FLKPED.TAIY
`caml7
`A..gins..a ggntyyadav kgRFTISQGN AKNTVFLQMD NLKPEDTAIY
`caml8
`A.aiqvvrsd trltdyadsv kgRFTISQGN TRNTVNLQMN SLTPEDTAIY
`caml9
`cam20 A..siyf..g dggtnyrdsv kgRFTISQLN AQNTVYLQMN SLRPEDSAMY
`cam21 A..vlst..k dgktfyadsv kgRFTIFLDN DRTTFSLQLD RLNPEDTADY
`cam24 T..aint..d gsviyaadsv kgRFTISQDT ARKTVYLQMN NLQPEDTATY
`cam25 Sgilsdgtpy tksgdyaesv rgRVTISRDN ARNMIYLQMN DLRPEDTAMY
`cam27 S..sin...i dgkttyadsv kgRFTISQDS ARNTVYLQMN SLRPEDTAMY
`cam29 S..siy...s dgktyyvdrm kgRFTISREN AKNTLYLQLS GLKPEDTAMY
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`Page 669 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`14
`
`Table 1 (Cont.) Comparison al' amino acid sequences of various immunoglobulins
`Alignment of a number of VB regions of Camel heavy chain antibodies compared
`with those of mouse (M, top line) and human (H, second line). Framework
`fragments are indicated in capitals, CDR fragments in small print; see SEQ. ID.
`NO: 13-31 for sequences indicated by M, H, 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,
`21, 24, 25, 27, 29, respectively.
`
`101
`139
`m
`y.. f
`dvWG AGTTVTVSS
`YCARdyygss
`h YCARxxxxxx xxxxxyyyyh x....fdyWG QGTLVTVSS
`caml YCKTalqpgg ycgygx
`clWG QGTQVTVSS
`cam2 YCGAvslmdr isqh
`gcRG QGTQVTVSL
`cam3 YCAAvpahlg pgaildlkky
`kyWG QGTQVTVSS
`dyWG QGTQVTVSS
`cam7 YCAAelsggs celpllf
`gqWG QGAQVTVSS
`cam9 YCAAdwkywt cgaqtggyf
`camll YCAArltemg acdarwatla trtfaynyWG QGTQVTVSS
`caml3 YCAAqkkdrt rwaeprew
`nnWG QGTQVTASS
`caml6 FCAAgsrfss pvgstsrles .sdy..nyWG QGIQVTASS
`caml7 YCAAadpsiy ysilxiey
`kyWG QGTQVTVSS
`caml8 YCAAdspcym ptmpappird sfgw..ddFG QGTQVTVSS
`nvWG QGTQVTVSS
`caml9 SCAAtssfyw ycttapy
`cam20 YCAIteiewy gcnlrttf
`trWG QGTQVTVSS
`cam21 YCAAnqlagg wyldpnywls vgay..aiWG QGTHVTVSS
`cam24 YCAArltemg acdarwatla trtfaynyWG RGTQVTVSS
`cam25 YCAVdgwtrk eggiglpwsv qcedgynyWG QGTQVTVSS
`dvWG QGTQVTVSS
`cam27 YCKIdsypch 11
`cam29 YCAPveypia dmcs
`ryGD PGTQVTVSS
`
`For example, according to Pessi et al. (1993) a subdomain portion of a VH region of
`common antibodies (containing both heavy chains and light chains) is sufficient to
`direct its folding, provided that a cognate VL moiety is present. Thus it might be
`expected from literature on the common antibodies that without VL chains proper
`folding of heavy chains cannot be achieved. A striking difference between the
`common antibodies and the Camelidae-derived heavy chain antibodies is, that the
`highly conserved apolar amino acid leucine (L) at place 45 present in commoh .
`antibodies is replaced in most of the Camelidae-dQmed heavy chain antibodies by
`the charged amino acid arginine (R), thereby preventing binding of the variable
`region of the heavy chain to that of the light chains.
`Another remarkable feature is that one of the CDRs of the heavy chains of this type
`of immunoglobulins from Canudidae, CDR3, is often much longer than the
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`Page 670 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`15
`
`corresponding CDR3 of common heavy chains. Besides the two conserved cysteines
`forming a disulphide bridge in common VH fragments, the Camelidae VH fragments
`often contain two additional cysteine residues, one of which often is present in
`CDR3.
`According to the present inventors these features indicate that CDR3 may play an
`important role in the binding of antigens by these heavy chain antibodies and can
`compensate for the absence of light chains (also containing CDRs) in binding of
`antigens by immunoglobulins in Camelidae.
`Thus, as the heavy chains of Camelidae do not have special features for interacting
`with corresponding light chains (which are absent), these heavy chains are very dif¬
`ferent from common heavy chains of immunoglobulins and seem intrinsically more
`suitable for secretion by prokaryotic and lower eukaryotic cells.
`
`The present inventors realized that these features make both intact heavy chain
`immunoglobulins of Camelidae and fragments thereof very attractive for their
`production by microorganisms. The same holds for derivatives thereof including
`functionalized fragments. In this specification the term "functionalized fragment" is
`used for indicating an antibody or fragment thereof to which one or more functional
`groups, including enzymes and other binding polypeptides, are attached resulting in
`fusion products of such antibody fragment with another biofunctional molecule.
`
`Summary of the invention
`In a broad sense the invention provides a process for the production of an antibody
`or a fragment or functionalized fragment thereof using a transformed lower
`eukaryotic host containing an expressible DNA sequence encoding the antibody or
`(functionalized) fragment thereof, wherein the antibody or (functionalized) fragment
`thereof is derived from a heavy chain immunoglobulin of Camelidae and is devoid of
`light chains, and wherein the lower eukaryotic host is a mould or a yeast. Thus the
`lower eukaryotic host can be a mould, e.g. belonging to the genera Aspergillus or
`Trichoderma, or a yeast, preferably belonging to the yeast genera Saccharomyces,
`Kluyveromcyes, Hansentda, or Pichia. Preferably the fragments still contain the whole
`variable domain of these heavy chains.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 671 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`16
`
`The invention also provides methods to produce such heavy chain immunoglobulins
`or (functionalized) fragments thereof in which methods the framework or the CDRs
`of these heavy chains are modified by random or directed mutagenesis in such a way
`that the mutated heavy chain is optimized for secretion by the host microorganism
`into the fermentation medium.
`Another embodiment of the invention is that CDRs can be grafted on these
`optimized frameworks (compare grafting of CDRs on human immunoglobulins as
`described by e.g. Jones et al., Nature 321 (1986) 522). These CDRs can be obtained
`from common antibodies or they may originate from heavy chain immunoglobulins
`of Camelidae. The binding properties may be optimized by random or directed
`mutagenesis. Thus in a process according to the invention an antibody or
`(functionalized) fragment thereof derived from a heavy chain immunoglobulin of
`Camelidae can be produced which comprises a CDR different from the CDR
`belonging to the natural antibody ex Camelidae which is grafted on the framework
`of the variable domain of the heavy chain immunoglobulin ex Camelidae.
`The invention also provides a method for the microbiological production of catalytic
`antibodies. These antibodies are preferably raised in Camelidae against transition
`state molecules following procedures similar to the one described by Lerner et al..
`Science 252 (1991) 659-667. Using random or site-directed mutagenesis such
`catalytic antibodies or fragments thereof can be modified in such a way that the
`catalytic activity of these (functionalized) antibodies or fragments can be further
`improved.
`For preparing modified heavy chain antibodies a process according to the invention
`is provided, in which the DNA sequence encodes a modified heavy chain immuno¬
`globulin or a (functionalized) fragment thereof derived from Camelidae and being
`devoid of light chains, and is made by random or directed mutagenesis or both.
`Thus the resulting immunoglobulin or (functionalized) fragment thereof is modified
`such that
`-
`it is better adapted for production by the host cell, or
`it is optimized for secretion by the lower eukaryotic host into the fermentation
`-
`medium, or
`its binding properties (kon and kofr) are optimized, or
`
`-
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 672 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`17
`
`-
`-
`-
`
`its catalytic activity is improved, or
`it has acquired a metal chelating activity, or
`its physical stability is improved.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Another particular embodiment of the present invention relates to genes encoding
`fusion proteins consisting of both a heavy chain immunoglobulin from Camelidae or
`part thereof and a second protein or another polypeptide, e.g. an enzyme, in parti¬
`cular an oxido-reductase, and to expression products of such genes. By means of the
`heavy chain immunoglobulin (fragment) the protein or enzyme can be guided to a
`target thereby increasing the local efficiency of the protein or enzyme significantly.
`Thus according to this embodiment of the invention a process is provided, in which
`the functionalized antibody or fragment thereof comprises a fusion protein of both a
`heavy chain immunoglobulin from Camelidae or a fragment thereof and another
`polypeptide, e.g. an enzyme, preferably an oxido-reductase.
`
`As a result of a process according to the invention known products may be
`produced, e.g. antibodies also produced by Camelidae, but many of the possible
`products will be new products, thus the invention also provides new products
`obtainable by a process according to the invention.
`The products so produced can be used in compositions for various applications.
`Therefore, the invention also relates to compositions containing a product produced
`by a process according to the invention. This holds for both old products and new
`products.
`
`Brief Description of the Figures
`Figures 1-4 were already described above in the draft publication.
`Characterisation and purification of camel IgG classes on Protein
`Figure 1
`A, Protein G and gel filtration.
`Repertoire complexity and antigen binding capacity of camel IgGj,
`IgG, and IgG, analysed by radioimmunoprecipitation (A) or
`Western blotting (B & C).
`
`Figure 2
`
`Page 673 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`Figure 3
`
`5
`
`Figure 4
`
`Figure 5
`
`10
`
`Figure 6
`
`Figure 7
`Figure 8
`Figure 9
`Figure 10
`Figure 11
`Figure 12
`Figure 13
`Figure 14
`Figure 15
`Figure 16
`Figure 17
`Figure 18
`Figure 19
`
`Figure 20
`Figure 21
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`18
`
`Amino acid sequences of the VH framework, and hinge/CqZ of
`Camelus divniedarius heavy chain immunoglobulins, compared to
`human (italic) Vj, framework (subgroup III) and hinges of human
`IgG (14); see SEQ. ID. NO: 4-12.
`Schematic representation of the structural organisation of the camel
`immunoglobulins (adapted from 26).
`DNA and amino acid sequences of the Camel VH fragments fol¬
`lowed by the Flag sequence as present in pB03 (Figure 5A), pB09
`(Figure 5B) and pB24 (Figure 5C); see SEQ. ID. NO: 32-37.
`Nucleotide sequence of synthetic DNA fragment cloned into
`pEMBL9 (Example 1); see SEQ. ID. NO: 38-41.
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pUR4423
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pUR4426
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pUR2778
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pUR4429
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pUR4430
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pUR4445
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pUR4446
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pUR4447
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pUR4451
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pUR4453
`Schematic drawings of plasmids pUR4437 and pUR4438
`Schematic drawings of plasmids pUR4439 and pUR4440
`Nucleotide sequence of synthetic DNA fragment cloned into
`pEMBL9 (Example 6); see SEQ. ID. NO: 42-45.
`Schematic drawing of plasmid pAW14B.
`Western blot analysis of culture medium of S. cerevisiae trans;
`formants containing pUR4423M (see A) or pUR4425M (see B).
`Samples were taken after 24 (see 1) or 48 hours (see 2). For
`pUR4425M two bands were found due to glycosylation of the
`antibody fragment.
`
`Page 674 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`19
`
`Detailed description of the invention
`The present invention relates io the production of antibodies or (functionalized)
`fragments thereof derived from heavy chain immunoglobulins of Camelidae by
`eukaryotes, more in particular by lower eukaryotes such as yeasts and fungi.
`Therefore, mRNA encoding immunoglobulins of Camelidae was isolated and
`transcribed into cDNA according to the procedures described in the above given
`draft publication and not prior-published European patent application 92402326.0.
`In each case primers for the PCR reaction directed to the N-terminus of the VH
`domain and PCR primers that either hybridize with the C-terminal regions of the
`Vn domain or with the short or large hinge regions as described in the above given
`draft publication, or with the C-terminal region of the Crl2 or CH3 domains can be
`used. In this way structural genes can be obtained encoding the following fragments
`of heavy chain immunoglobulins of Camelidae (Table 2).
`
`Table 2. The various forms of immunoglobulins of Camelidae that can be
`expressed in microorganisms.
`
`a.
`b.
`c.
`d.
`
`e.
`
`the variable domain of a heavy chain;
`the variable domain and the short hinge of a heavy chain;
`the variable domain and the long hinge of a heavy chain;
`the variable domain, the CH2 domain, and either the short or long hinge
`of a heavy chain;
`a complete heavy chain, including either the short or long hinge.
`
`According to procedures described in detail in the Examples these cDNAs can be
`integrated into expression vectors.
`Known expression vectors for Sacchammyces, Khiyveromcyes, Hansenula, Pichia and
`Aspergillus can be used for incorporating a cDNA or a recombinant DNA according
`to the invention. The resulting vectors contain the following sequences that are re¬
`quired for expression: (a) a constitutive, or preferably an inducible, promoter; (b) a
`leader or signal sequence; (c) one of the structural genes as described in Table 2
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 675 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`20
`
`and (d) a terminator. If the vector is an episomal vector, it preferably comprises an
`origin of replication as well as a selection marker, preferably a food grade selection
`marker, (EP-A-487159, UNILEVER / Leenhouts et al.). If the vector is an
`integration vector, then it preferably comprises sequences that ensure integration
`and a selection marker in addition to the sequences required for expression of the
`structural gene encoding a form of the heavy chain immunoglobulin of Camelidae or
`derivatives thereof. The preferred sequences for integration are sequences encoding
`ribosomal DNA (WO 91/00920, 1991. UNILEVER / Giuseppin et al.) whereas the
`selection marker will be preferably a food grade marker.
`For Saccharomyces the preferred inducible promoter is the GAL7 promoter (EP-A-
`0255153, UNILEVER / Fellinger et al.); for Kluyveromyces the preferred inducible
`promoter is the inulinase promoter (not yet published EP application 92203932.6,
`UNILEVER / Toschka & Verbakel, which is incorporated herein by reference); for
`Hansenula or Pichia the preferred inducible promoter is the methanol-oxidase
`promoter (Sierkstra et al., Current Genetics 19 (1991) 81-87) and for Aspergillus the
`preferred inducible promoter is the endo-xylanase promoter (not prior-published
`PCT application PCT/EP 92/02896, UNILEVER / Gouka et al., now publicly
`available as WO-A-93/12237, which is incorporated herein by reference).
`To achieve efficient secretion of the heavy chain immunoglobulin or parts thereof
`the leader (secretion) sequences of the following proteins are preferred: invertase
`and a-factor for Saccharomyces, inulinase for Kluyveromyces, invertase for Hansenula
`or Pichia (Sierkstra et al., 1991 supra) and either glucoamylase or xylanase for
`Aspergillus (not prior-published PCT application WO-A-93/12237, supra). As food¬
`grade selection markers, genes encoding anabolic functions like the leucine2 and
`tryptophan3 are preferred (Giuseppin et al. 1991, supra). The present invention
`describes the heterologous production of (functionalized) derivatives or fragments of
`immunoglobulins in a microorganism, which immunoglobulins in nature occur .not as
`a composite of heavy chains and light chains, but only as a composite of heavy
`chains. Although the secretion mechanism of mammals and microorganisms is quite
`similar, in details there are differences that are important for developing industrial
`processes.
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`Page 676 of 1663
`
`

`

`WO 94/25591
`
`PCT/EP94/01442
`
`21
`
`To obtain frameworks of the heavy chain immunoglobulins, that are optimally
`secreted by lower eukaryotes, genes encoding several different heavy chains can be
`cloned into the coat protein of bacteriophages and subsequently the frameworks of
`these heavy chain immunoglobulins can be mutated using known PCR technology,
`e.g. Zhou et al., (1991). Subsequently the mutated genes can be been cloned in
`Saccharomyces and Aspergillus and the secretion of the mutated genes can be
`compared with the wild type genes. In this way frameworks optimized for secretion
`may be selected.
`Alternatively these structural genes can be linked to the cell wall anchoring part of
`cell wall proteins, preferably GPl-linked cell wall proteins of lower eukaryotes,
`which result in the expression of a chimeric protein on the cell wall of these lower
`eukaryotes (not prior-published EP application 92202080.5, UNILEVER / Klis et
`al., now publicly available as International (PCT) patent application WO-A-
`94/01567, which is incorporated herein by reference).
`Both methods have the advantage that the binding parts of the immunoglobulins are
`well exposed to the surrounding of the cell, microorganism, or phage and therefore
`can bind antigens optimally. By changing the external conditions the binding rates
`and dissociation rates of this binding reaction can be influenced. Therefore, these
`systems are very suitable to select for mutated immunoglobulins that have different
`binding properties. The mutation of the immunoglobulins can either be obtained by
`random mutagenesis, or directed mutagenesis based on extensive molecular
`modelling and molecul

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket