throbber
30561909
`
`=> 2 PROPERTY OF THE
`NATIONAL
`NATIONAL
`|IBRARY OF
`LMEDICNE]«=WEDICINE Sie
`
`AAV-based gene therapy prevents neuropathology and results in normalcognitive
`developmentin the hyperargininemic mouse
`si
`encipiaainiath ;
`GENE THERAPY
`
`N [2013 VOLUME 2@ ISSUE 8
`
`| (aN0:8;
`
`Page 1 of 12
`
`KELONIA EXHIBIT 1007
`
`Gene therapy.
`v. 20, no. 8 (Aug. 2013)
`General Collection
`W1 GE184Q
`2013-08-28 13:22:13
`
`Volume 20 Number8
`
`August 2013
`
`www.nature.com/gt
`
`7
`
`a.A
`
`ACMeteatte
`
`ic vehicle for CNS
`
`En
`
`ature publishing
`P
`
`grou
`6 5f0up
`
`5
`
`IND
`SR96801
`
`Page 1 of 12
`
`KELONIA EXHIBIT 1007
`
`

`

`Gene Therapy
`
`European Editor
`Nicholas Lemoine
`London, UK
`
`USA Editor
`Joseph Glorioso
`Pittsburgh, PA, USA
`
`Associate Editors
`
`Robin Ali
`University College London, UK
`Roger Hajjar
`Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
`Steven Ghivizzani
`University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
`Antonio Chiocca
`Ohio University, Columbus, OH, USA
`
`David Fink
`University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Ml, USA
`Edvard Smith
`Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
`Xuetao Cao
`Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, P. R. China
`
`Editorial Office
`
`Virginia Boylan
`
`Aims and Scope
`
`Gene Therapy covers both the research and clinical applications of the new genetic therapy techniques currently being
`developed. Over the last decade, gene therapy protocols have entered clinical trials in increasing numbers and as they
`cover a wide spectrum of diseases, these studies promise to unite the diverse organ-based specialities into which
`modern medicine has becomedivided. Gene Therapy coversall aspects of gene therapy as applied to human disease,
`including:
`
`Novel technological developments for gene transfer, control and silencing
`Basic science studies of mechanisms of gene transfer and control of expression
`Preclinical animal model systems and validation studies
`Clinical trial reports which have significant impact for the field
`Gene-based vaccine development and applications
`Cell-based therapies including all aspects of stem cells and genetically modified cellular approaches
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`

`

`Gene Therapy
`
`
`
`August 2013
`
`
`CONTENTS
`
`Volume 20, Number 8
`
`| ORIGINAL ARTICLES
`
`785
`
`797
`
`807
`
`816
`
`AAV-based gene therapy prevents neuropathology and results in normal cognitive development in the hyperargininemic
`mouse
`EK Lee, C Hu, R Bhargava, R Ponnusamy, H Park, S Novicoff, N Rozengurt, B Marescau, P De Deyn, D Stout, L Schlichting,
`WW Grody, SD Cederbaum and GS Lipshutz
`
`Engineered stem cell-derived microglia as therapeutic vehicle for experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
`C Beutner, V Lepperhof, A Dann, B Linnartz-Gerlach, S Litwak, | Napoli, M Prinz and H Neumann
`
`Engineering a serum-resistant and thermostable vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein for pseudotyping retroviral
`and lentiviral vectors
`B-Y Hwang and DV Schaffer
`
`Novelelectric power-driven hydrodynamic injection system for gene delivery: safety and efficacy of human
`factor IX delivery in rats
`T Yokoo, K Kamimura, T Suda, T Kanefuji, M Oda, G Zhang, D Liu and Y Aoyagi
`
`824
`
`Retinal gene therapy with a large MYO7A cDNA using adeno-associated virus
`VS Lopes, SE Boye, CM Louie, $ Boye, F Dyka, V Chiodo, H Fofo, WW Hauswirth and DS Williams
`
`834
`
`846
`
`Suppression of breast tumor growth by DNA vaccination against phosphatase of regenerating liver 3
`J Lv,
`Liu, H Huang, L Meng, B Jiang, Y Cao, Z Zhou, T She, L Qu, S Wei Song and C Shou
`
`Hydrodynamic delivery of adiponectin and adiponectin receptor 2 gene blocks high-fat diet-induced obesity
`andinsulin resistance
`Y Ma and D Liu
`
`SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
`
`| 853
`
`Efficient selection of genetically modified human T cells using methotrexate-resistant human dihydrofolate
`reductase
`M Jonnalagadda, CE Brown, WC Chang, JR Ostberg, SJ Forman and MC Jensen
`
`861
`
`868
`
`Multi-cistronic vector encoding optimized safety switch for adoptive therapy with T-cell receptor-modified T cells
`MM van Loenen, R de Boer, RS Hagedoorn, V Jankipersadsing, AL Amir, JHF Falkenburg and MHM Heemskerk
`
`Lack of genotoxicity due to foamy virus vector integration in human iPSCs
`DR Deyle,
`IF Khan, G Ren and DW Russell
`
`@
`
`nature publishing group
`
`
`
`Copyright © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited
`
`Subscribing organisations are encouraged to copy and distribute
`this table of contents for internal, non-commercial purposes
`
`This issue is now available at:
`www.nature.com/gt
`This journal is a member of, and subscribes to the principles of, the
`Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) www.publicationethics.org
`
`cor |
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`€
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`

`

`residues (Thr344, lle98, Phe125 and Phe470) would appear unable
`to interact with components of human serum, and the former set
`of mutations was instead investigated.
`
`Functional analysis of individual VSV-G mutations
`As there were no dominant individual clones following selection,
`we analyzed the roles of the common mutations in potential VSV-G
`serum resistance. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to introduce
`the individual, identified point mutations into the surface-exposed
`positions of wild-type VSV-G (Figure 1), and GFP-expressing retroviral
`vectors were packaged. We found that with the exception of $162T,
`the genomic titers (G-titers) of mutant vectors were equivalent to
`wild-type vector (Figure 2a), suggesting that VSV-G can tolerate
`mutations that emerged from this library selection without the loss
`of assembly. The mutantinfectioustiters (\-titers) were similar to wild
`type, with the exceptions that VSV-G E380K exhibited a 40%
`increase, and K66T and T368A showed a 70% decrease,respectively,
`in infectivity (Figure 2b). We investigated the relativeratio of I-titer to
`G-titer of all mutant variants (Figure 2c and Supplementary Data
`Figure S4C). Vector containing K66T, $162T, T230N or T368A VSV-G
`showed somewhatlower I-titer/G-titer ratios compared with the
`wild type, suggesting that these mutations slightly decreased the
`infectivities of the viral vectors. We also investigated the relative
`ratio of VSV-G expression level, as obtained with a VSV-G Enzyme
`linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), to G-titer (Figure 2c), and did
`not observe any significant differences compared with wild-type
`VSV-G.
`
`Engineering a serum-resistant and thermostable VSV-G
`B-Y Hwang and DVSchaffer
`
`e 8
`
`08
`
`sensitivity to human complement, through this approach has not
`been broadly explored.”°
`Directed evolution has recently been developed and imple-
`mented to improve numerous properties of viral vectors, and this
`approach can be effective even in the absence of a mechanistic
`understanding of challenges facing a vector system.In particular,
`multiple studies have applied molecular evolution to improve
`vector stability, pseudotyping efficiency, transduction efficiency,
`resistance to antibodies, genomic integration selectivity and other
`properties.**** Here, we explore whether directed evolution of
`the VSV-G envelope may enable pseudotyped viral vectors to
`resist neutralization by human serum. Through a combination of
`evolution and site-directed mutagenesis, we created VSV-G
`variants that are both resistant to a panel of human and animal
`sera and are thermostable. Furthermore, variants exhibited enhan-
`ced gene delivery in the presence of human serum in vivo.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Library construction and selection
`two
`VSV-G libraries were constructed by error-prone PCR at
`different mutation rates: a 210° mutant
`library with a low
`error
`rate of 1-4 nucleotide mutations per VSV-G sequence
`and a 2x 10° mutant
`library with 3-8 nucleotide mutations
`per sequence, as quantified by sequencing of randomly chosen
`clones. For selection, these libraries were inserted into a retroviral
`vector plasmid that was used to package a library of vector
`particles, where each harbored a vector genome encoding the
`Human serum inactivation of variant VSV-G retroviral vectors
`VSV-G variant incorporated in the envelope of that particle. This
`The human serum inactivation of retroviral vectors bearing wild
`requires that ~ 1 plasmid carrying a VSV-G variant be transfected
`type and single mutant VSV-G variants was examined. As
`into a producer cell during packaging. Forinitial optimization of
`noninfectious of empty particles could conceivably affect a
`this process, Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) 293T cells were
`neutralization assay, we used the results of a VSV-G ELISA assay
`transfected with 62.5 ng—2 wg of the retroviral vector pCLPIT GFP
`(Supplementary Data Figure $4C) to equalize the amountof VSV-G
`followed by flow cytometry analysis (Supplementary Data Figure
`added to each sample. The resulting ELISA-normalized viral
`$1). Upon transfection with 62.5 ng of pCLPIT GFP, ~ 15% of cells
`vectors levels were incubated with the mixture of human serum
`expressed GFP, suggesting that these conditions may introduce
`from 18 donors. Following serum incubation at 37Cfor 1h, titers
`on average <1 plasmid per cell and could thus produce the
`were quantitated and reported as the percentage of remaining
`desired virion library. Therefore,
`the two CLPIT VSV-G libraries
`titer compared with that of control samples incubated at 37 C for
`were packaged separately using these conditions, and the
`1h with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) (Figure 3a) or
`resulting vectors were combinedfor selection.
`heat inactivated (56 C, 30min) human sera (HIHS) (Supplemen-
`To develop a strategy for selecting VSV-G variants resistant to
`tary Data Figure $5A). Viral vectors were not inactivated in HIHS,
`serum neutralization, retroviral vector pseudotyped with wild-type
`suggesting that the inactivation may be caused by complement
`VSV-G was diluted fivefold in a mixture of human serum from 18
`(Supplementary Data Figure S5B), and the results of these two
`donors and incubated at 37 C (Supplementary Data Figure $2).
`normalization were thus very comparable.In particular, individual
`Vector infectivity progressively decreased with longerincubations,
`VSV-G mutants $162T (P<0.05), T230N (P<0.05) or T368A
`such that only ~ 5%of the vector remainedinfective after 6h. The
`(P<0.05) showed significantly increased human serum resistance
`VSV-G library was
`thus
`selected to evade human serum
`compared with wild-type VSV-G (Figure 3a).
`inactivation by incubating the virions with serum at 37 C for
`6h. 293T cells were then infected with the treated viral vector
`Incubation in serum at 37 C may select not only for serum
`resistance but serendipitously also for
`thermostability, so we
`library (at a multiplicity of infection<0,1 to prevent multiple
`further examined the results for the vectors before and after
`infections of a single cell). Following the selection with 1 jig ml |
`incubation for 1h in PBS (Figure 3b). Mutants carrying K66T, T368A
`of puromycin, the selected viral pool was rescued via transfection
`or E380K interestingly showed higher thermostability compared
`of the pCMV gag/pol helper plasmid.
`with wild-type VSV-G (P<0.05). Because of the combined effects
`This process was repeated for six selection steps, and VSV-G
`of serum resistance and thermal stability, a mutant carrying T368A
`variants were then recovered from 293T cell genomic DNA via
`showed > 1.6-fold higher infectivity (P<0.01) compared with wild-
`PCR and inserted into the plasmid pcDNA IVS to generate
`type VSV-G upon incubation in human serum at 37°C for 1h
`helper plasmids for vector production. DNA sequencing revealed
`(Figure 3c). On the basis of these data, the $162T, T230N and
`that while there were no duplicates among 36 randomly chosen
`T368A mutations were deemed beneficial for serum resistance.
`VSV-G clones, common mutations were present
`(Figure 1a;
`Combining mutations that individually contribute to a given
`Supplementary Data Figure $3). The positions of these ‘hot spot’
`property can further enhance that property.*'“* We therefore,
`mutations were analyzed within the structure of the prefusion
`generated a number of double and triple VSV-G mutants from
`form of VSV-G (Figure 1b),“° which indicated that Lys66, Ser162,
`individual mutations shown to confer serum resistance. All VSV-G
`Asp208, Ser212, Lys216, Thr230, Thr368 and Glu380 are located on
`mutants analyzed showedsignificantly higher resistance (P<0.01
`the protein surface.
`In addition, Thr344 is
`located in
`the
`or 0.05) to human serum (gray bars in Figure 4a). Furthermore, all
`core region, lle98 and Phe125 are located on the leg region that
`such mutants showed similar thermal stability compared with
`points toward the viral membrane and Phe470 is located on the
`wild-type VSV-G (striped bars in Figure 4a). For comparison, we
`transmembrane domain of VSV-G. The latter, nonsolvent exposed
`
`Gene Therapy (2013) 807-815
`
`2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`€
`

`

`Engineering a serum-resistant and thermostable VSV-G
`B-Y Hwang and DV Schaffer
`
`809
`
`
`
`a 66
`
`> 0.5
`=]
`55
`04
`o
`& 03

`&
`2
`S 02
`= 0.1
`
`301
`
`351
`
`401
`
`451
`
`504
`
`E380K
`S212E
`T368A
`
`
`D208A \ Fras
`T230N/A
`T3444
`S
`\
`F4708
`
`
`$162T
`/
`201 251
`
`154
`
`Position
`
`Figure 1. Common mutations following directed evolution of VSV-G. (a) The frequency of mutation at each amino acid residue of VSV-G
`among 36 randomly chosen VSV-G clonesafter five or six selection steps. (b) The location of each apparent ‘hot spot mutation’in the crystal
`structure of the prefusion form of VSV-G (PDBID: 2J6J). Figure was made using PyMol (http://www.pymol.org). Each monomer of VSV-G was
`colored in green, purple and sky blue, respectively. Green, blue and red balls represent carbon, nitrogen and oxygen atoms, respectively.
`
`also prepared retroviral vector pseudotyped with an RD114
`envelope, which has previously been reported to have higher
`serum resistance than wild-type VSV-G,**" as another control. As
`reported, RD114 showed increased resistance to human serum
`compared with wild-type VSV-G,
`though again this envelope
`cannot package vector to the high titers needed for in vivo use.**
`Collectively,
`the T230N+7T368A mutant
`showed the highest
`residual infectivity (~ 68%) compared with the residual infectivity
`of parental VSV-G (~ 37%) and similar residual infectivity (~ 68%)
`of RD114 after incubation in human serum at 37 C for 1h.
`K66T, T368A and E380K mutations increased VSV-G thermal
`Stability (Figure 3), and we thus investigated the effects of adding
`these mutations
`to the promising serum-resistant variants.
`Several variants containing K66T or K66T + E380K substitutions
`showed similar or slightly higher thermal stability compared
`with wild-type VSV-G, and several mutants
`(K66T +S162T +
`T230N+7368A, K66T+T368A+E380K and K66T+S$162T+
`T230N + E380K) also showedstatistically higher serum resistance
`(P<0.05) (Figures 4b andc).
`
`Human serum inactivation of variant VSV-G lentiviral vectors
`Although the envelope compositions of retroviral and lentiviral
`vectors are likely similar, we also analyzed the ability of VSV-G
`
`variants to confer serum resistance to lentivirus. On the basis of
`results with retroviral vectors, we analyzed the top five VSV-G
`variants (S162T + T230N, S162T + T368A, T230N + T368A, K66T +
`T368A+E380K and K66T+5$162T +1T230N+T368A)
`showing
`higher
`serum resistance
`for
`retrovirus. Equal
`amounts of
`packaged lentivirus (7 x 10° GFP TU) were diluted fivefold in
`human serum, or PBS (pH 7.4) as a control, and incubated at 37 C
`for 1h. Vector pseudotyped with several mutant VSV-G showed a
`greater resistance to human serum compared with wild-type
`VSV-G pseudotyped lentiviral vector
`(Figure 5).
`Importantly,
`mutants
`1T230N+7368A or K66T+5S162T+7230N+1368A
`had higher combined thermostability and serum resistance than
`wild-type VSV-G.
`
`Vector inactivation by animal serum
`VSV-G pseudotyped viral vectors can be inactivated by sera from
`mouse, rat and guinea pig, which can impact the interpretation of
`animal studies.”’“* The relative sensitivity of VSV-G pseudotyped
`retroviral or lentiviral vectors to several animal sera was thus
`tested (Figures 6a and b, respectively). $162T +T230N, T230N +
`T368A or K66T + $162T + T230N + T368A VSV-G showed statisti-
`cally higher resistance to mouse and rabbit sera for both retroviral
`and lentiviral vectors.
`
`© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited
`
`Gene Therapy (2013) 807-815
`
`me
`Page 6 of 12
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`

`


`810
`
`Engineering a serum-resistant and thermostable VSV-G
`B-Y Hwang and DV Schaffer
`
`a 1.0E+10
`s
`E
`>
`2 1.06409

`F
`
`;
`
`:
`
`a 700
`ZS
`60.0
`:
`=
`S

`3
`3oOo
`[rd
`
`.
`
`:
`
`;
`
`;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`j
`
`-
`:
`1.0E+08
`WT
`K66T S162T D208A $212E K216N T230N T368A E380K
`
`WT -K66T=$462T S212E«-KZ16N|T230NT368A 380K«208A
`1.0E+07
`
`b
`
`
`
`
`=
`5
`© 1.0+06
`=
`5
`Fa
`
`1.0E+05
`
`c
`
`1.6
`44
`o 12
`2,
`o
`>
`08
`3 06
`04
`ia
`
`o
`
`$162T D208A S212E K218N T230N T368A E380K
`K66T
`WT
`Figure 2. Genomic andinfectioustiters of VSV-G chimeric retroviral
`vectors. Murine retroviral vector was packaged with the pCLPIT GFP
`vector plasmid, pCMV gag-pol and pcDNAIVS VSV-G helper plasmid
`containing individual VSV-G variants.
`(a) Vector genomic titers
`(G-titers) were measured by real-time quantitative PCR. (b) Trans-
`duction efficiencies on 293T cells were determined by flow
`cytometry analysis of retroviral vector mediated GFP expression.
`(c) Relative ratios of infectioustiters (Ititers) to G-titers (gray bars)
`and VSV-G ELISA data to G-titers (black bars) of the retroviral vectors
`were calculated with the ratio of wild-type VSV-G pseudotyped
`retroviral vector as 1, respectively. Error bars denote s.d. (n= 3).
`* and ** indicate statistical differences of P<0.05 and P<0.01,
`respectively, compared with infectivity of wild-type VSV-G,
`as
`determined using an one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
`
`b 100.090.0
`= 80.0
`2 700
`= 800
`@
`Z 500
`= 40.0
`S 300
`2 20.0
`40.0
`0.0
`
`
`
`c 600
`=
`— 45.0
`= 40.0
`= 350]
`3 300
`2
`|
`2 250)
`3 20.0
`SB
`150
`2 1004
`=
`504
`0.0
`
`WT
`
`-K66T
`
`=—S162T
`
`208A S212E
`
`-K216N
`
`T230N
`
`T368A
`.
`
`E3BOK
`
`T
`
`|
`m
`
`|
`
`|
`
`;
`
`:
`
`-
`
`1
`
`980K
`T36BA
`T230N
`KZ16N
`S212E
`0208A
`S162T
` K6ST
`WT
`Figure 3, Human serum resistance and thermostability of retroviral
`vectors pseudotyped with VSV-G mutants. The amounts of viral
`vectors were normalized based on VSV-G ELISA assay. (a) Human
`serum neutralization was quantified by measuring vectortiters after
`incubation with human serum at 37 C for 1h,relative to those after
`incubation with PBS at 37 C for 1h.
`(b) Thermal effects were
`determined by quantifying relative titers after incubation with PBS
`at 37 C for 1h compared with those without incubation at 37 C.
`(c) Human serum neutralization and thermal effects were deter-
`mined by calculation of relative titers after incubation with human
`serum at 37 C for 1h compared with those without incubation at
`37 C. Error bars denote s.d. (n=4). * and ** indicate statistical
`differences of P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively, compared with
`infectivity of wild-type VSV-G, as determined using an one-way
`ANOVA.
`
`In vitro transduction of several cell lines
`Although theinfectivities of 293T cells were comparable with wild-
`type VSV-G in the absence of human serum (Figure 2), we
`characterized transduction of several other cell lines to determine
`whether the mutations affected infectivity (Figure 7). Although the
`infectivities of the variants were somewhat lower for several cell
`types, the trends in infectivity for all
`lines was similar between
`wild-type and mutant VSV-G. Interestingly, the mutant carrying
`K66T + $1621 +1230N +1368A showedstatistically higher trans-
`duction efficiency to Hela cells compared with wild type
`(P<0.01).
`
`In vivo analysis of human serum resistance
`The ability of two promising variants—which we now term mutant
`1
`(T230N+7368A)
`and mutant
`2
`(K66T+$162T+T230N+
`T368A)—to resist human serum neutralization in
`a murine
`model was analyzed. For the in vivo neutralization assays, vector
`could be added to 100% human serum; however, human serum
`
`administration in vivo results in an ~ 10-fold dilution of the serum
`into circulation. To tune the level of vector that should be
`administered to observe neutralization, a preliminary study with
`wild-type VSV-G was conducted, and the interval between serum
`and lentiviral vector administration was also varied. BALB/c mice
`were injected with 20041 of human serum, or PBS as a control,
`into the tail vein. One, 5, or 24h later, lentiviral vector encoding
`firefly luciferase was administered. For an 8 x 10'° vector genome
`administration, after two weeks expression was observed in the
`liver,
`the primary site of lentiviral vector transduction.” Also,
`expression levels were lower for vector administered 1 or 5h, but
`not 24h,after infection of human serum, compared with the PBS
`control (data not shown).
`To assess neutralization of the VSV-G mutants, equal levels of
`lentiviral vector (8 x 10'° vector genomes) were injected via the
`tail vein 1h after the administration of 200 ul of human serum of
`PBS. After 2 weeks, the mice were killed, and luciferase expression
`levels were analyzed in the liver. The presence of human serum
`reduced luciferase expression mediated by wild-type VSV-G to
`
`Gene Therapy (2013) 807-815
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`

`

`Engineering a serum-resistant and thermostable VSV-G
`
`B-Y Hwang and DV Schaffer
`
`0.0 Residual
`
`Infectivity(%)
`
`\N
`\
`\
`NN
`r S
`T230N,
`T3684,
`
`RS
`
`g 8
`
`60.0
`40.0
`20.0
`0.0
`
`SS
`
`T
`
`WT
`
`$162T,
`T230N
`
`$162T,
`T368A,
`
`T
`
`K66T,
`T368A,
`E380K
`
`K66T,
`$162T,
`T230N,
`T368A
`
`5. Human serum neutralization and thermostability of
`Figure
`lentiviral vectors pseudotyped with VSV-G variants. A standard
`GFP encoding lentiviral vector was packaged with five VSV-G
`mutants that appeared promising in the retroviral results. Five VSV-G
`variants ($162T+T230N, S162T + T368A, T230N+7368A, K66T +
`T368A + E380K and K66T + $162T + T230N + T368A) showing higher
`resistance and thermal stability for retroviral vector packaging were
`selected. Thermal effects, human serum neutralization and com-
`bined serum neutralization and thermal effects were determined by
`quantifying relative titers after incubation with PBS at 37°C for 1h
`compared with those without incubation at 37°C, after incubation
`with human serum at 37 C for 1h compared with those after
`incubation with PBS at 37°C for 1h, and after incubation with
`human serum at 37 C for 1h compared with those without
`incubation at 37 C,
`respectively. Error bars denote s.d. (n= 4).
`* and ** indicate statistical differences of P<0.05 and P<0.01,
`respectively, compared with the wild-type VSV-G, as determined
`using an one-way ANOVA.
`
`
`
`RDW14
`
`WT
`
`$1627, T230N S162T,T36BA T230N,T368A $4162T,
`
`T230N,A
`
`
`
`z43€E
`
`S53ze
`
`oowe
`
`oO
`
`rmal
`120.0
`a 420>|= Thermal
`Serum
`Serum
`mal+Serum
`4
`@ Thermai+Serum!
`
`100 +
`SS
`
`
`
`ResidualInfectivity(%)
`(%) RDIW14
`
`ResidualInfectivity
`
`
`
`WT
`
`
`
`vehicles for gene transfer gene in vitro and in vivo. However,
`while VSV-G pseudotyped vectors
`have been increasingly
`explored for ex vivo gene delivery in clinical
`trials,#°*” serum
`neutralization of
`the VSV-G pseudotyped viral vectors
`is
`a
`significant obstacle for direct
`in vivo administration.
`In this
`study, we conducted directed evolution of VSV-G to create
`K66T,
`K667,
`K66T,
`K66T,
`Ké66T,
`K66T,
`K66T,
`$1627,
`T230N,
`$1627,
`$162T,
`368A,
`T230N,
`S162T,
`serum-resistant VSV-G mutants. After six selection steps, followed
`T230N,
`T36BA,
`T368A,
`T230N,
`E380K
`E380K
`E380K
`
`
`E3s0K §=6E380K=T368A,«6E380K
`by functional analysis of common mutations, we identified several
`E380K
`mutations ($162T, T230N and T368A) that enhanced VSV-G serum
`resistance. Furthermore, as incubation at 37 C was inherent to
`the selection, we also identified several adventitious mutations
`(K66T, T368A and E380K)
`that apparently increased VSV-G
`thermostability. Upon combining these two classes of mutations,
`retroviral and lentiviral vectors pseudotyped with two resulting
`VSV-G_
`variants
`(T230N+T368A and K66T+S$162T+7230N
`+ 1368A) showed higher resistance to human and animal sera,
`as well as increased thermostability compared with wild-type
`VSV-G. While adeno-associated virus has been evolved to resist
`antibody neutralization,*®***? to our knowledge this is the first
`effort to harness iterative random mutagenesis and selection to
`endow retroviral or lentiviral vectors with the capacity to resist
`serum inactivation.
`VSV-G pseudotyped viral vectors can be inactivated in serum by
`complement,“°*° a major elementof the innate immune response
`that
`in general
`functions via classical, alternative and lectin
`pathways.”' All pathways can mediate virus opsonization, virolysis
`and anaphylatoxin and chemotaxin production. However,
`the
`particular mechanisms by which complement inactivates VSV-G
`presenting virions are unknown. The mutation sites
`(Ser162,
`Thr230 and Thr368) we identified do notlie within several known
`antibody binding epitopes,”° indicating that these residues may
`lie in previously uncharacterized epitopes, or that VSV-G may
`interact with complement via mechanisms
`independent of
`antibody
`neutralization. Despite
`the
`lack of mechanistic
`information underlying a given gene delivery problem, directed
`evolution can still be used to create enhanced variants, which in
`
`4. Human serum neutralization and thermostability of
`Figure
`retroviral vectors pseudotyped with VSV-G variants that combine
`several
`‘hot
`spot mutations! VSV-G mutants with combined
`beneficial mutations were generated bysite-directed mutagenesis.
`The amounts ofviral vectors were normalized based on VSV-G ELISA
`assay. Thermal effects, human serum neutralization and combined
`serum neutralization and thermal effects were determined by
`quantifying relative titers after incubation with PBS at 37 C for 1h
`compared with those without incubation at 37 ‘C, after incubation
`with human serum at 37 C for 1h compared with those after
`incubation with PBS at 37°C for 1h, and after incubation with
`human serum at 37°C for 1h compared with those without
`incubation at 37 C, respectively. (a) Variants contained ‘hot spot
`Mutations’ for human serum resistance. (b) K66T and (¢) E380K were
`added to enhance the thermal stability of retroviral vectors. Error
`bars denote s.d. (n=4). * and ** indicate statistical differences
`of P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively, compared with the wild-type
`VSV-G, as determined using an one-way ANOVA.
`
`Only 22.1% of PBS-injected controls in the liver. The human serum
`reduced mutants 1 and 2 to only 60%of PBS controls, levels that
`Were nearly threefold higher than wild-type VSV-G under the same
`Conditions (Figure 8).
`
`DISCUSSION
`their broad tropism and high stability, VSV-G
`Because of
`Pseudotyped retroviral and lentiviral vectors are promising
`
`© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited
`
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`Gene Therapy (2013) 807-815
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`

`

`S WT
`G T230N, T368A
`@ K66T, $162T, T230N, T368A
`
`
`
`
`
`Relativeluciferaseactivity(%)
`
`
`
`
`
`two variants
`Figure 8. Human serum neutralization in vivo. For
`(T230N +7368A and K66T + $162T + T230N + T368A) and wild type
`VSV-G,lentiviral vectors encoding luciferase were administered via
`tail vein injection to female BALB/c mice one hour after human
`serum or PBS introduction. After two weeks,
`levels of luciferase
`activity were determined and normalized to total protein for each
`sample analyzed. Relative
`luciferase
`expression in
`liver was
`determined by quantifying relative enzyme activity from human
`serum-primed mice relative to activity from naive mice. Error bars
`denote s.d. (n = 4). * and ** indicate statistical differences of P<0.05
`and P<0.01,
`respectively, compared with wild type VSV-G, as
`determined using an one-way ANOVA.
`
`Engineering a serum-resistant and thermostable VSV-G
`B-Y Hwang and DVSchaffer
`
`aWT
`(0 $162T, T230N
`5 T230N, T368A
`©) K66T, $1627, T230N, T368A
`
`Mouse
`
`Rabbit
`
`a
`
`=
`=&
`eao
`
`=a33w®
`
`iv
`
`5@e N
`
`b 100.0 5
`
`= 300 |
`
`
`
`
`
`
`60.0
`
`4005
`
`20.0 4
`
`0.0
`
`Mouse
`
`Rabbit
`
`2==
`
`33a o
`
`e
`
`2&w
`
`e
`
`Figure 6. Aminal serum neutralization of retroviral and lentiviral
`vectors pseudotyped with VSV-G variants. For
`three variants
`(S162T +T230N, T230N +T368A and K66T+$162T +T230N +
`T368A) and wild-type VSV-G, neutralization by animal sera was
`examined.
`(a) Retroviral vectors and (b)
`lentiviral vectors were
`diluted fivefold in animal sera and incubated at 37 C for 1h, Serum
`inactivation was determined by quantifying relative titers after
`incubation with human serum at 37 C for 1h compared with those
`after incubation with PBS at 37 C for 1h. Error bars denote s.d.
`(n=4). * and ** indicate statistical differences of P<0.05 and
`P<0.01,
`respectively, compared with the wild-type VSV-G,
`as
`determined using an one-way ANOVA.
`
`administration. The extracellular half-life of retroviral vectorslies
`between 3.5 and 8h at 37°C°°°'? and our measurement
`(t1/2= ~3h) is close to this range. Therefore, our incubation of
`the library for 6h in human serum at 37 C also selected for
`enhanced thermostability. An increased protein thermal stability
`can be caused by several factors such as disulfide bond formation,
`hydrophobic interactions or change of electrostatic interactions of
`the surface.*? The E380K mutation in VSV-G may eliminatealike-
`4.0E+08
`charge
`repulsion with Asp381
`and create opposite-charge
`attraction on the protein surface to confer thermostability to the
`protein. By comparison, potential mechanisms for K66T and T368A
`thermostabilization are not as readily apparent. At any rate,
`combining these mutations with others that conferred serum
`resistance resulted in vectors with both the properties.
`In
`particular, mutants 1 and 2 showed a twofold increase in half-
`life at 37 -C (ty. = ~ 6h). These improvements of thermal stability
`may have also contributed slightly to a greater stability to vector
`concentration by ultracentrifugation (data not shown).
`for
`Cocal-pseudotyped lentiviral vectors may have potential
`in vivo gene therapy, due to their high titers, broad tropism,
`stability and reported increased resistance to human serum
`compared with VSV-G pseudotyped vectors.*' However, unlike
`VSV-G,
`their
`in vivo use has not yet been reported. RD114-
`pseudotped vectors also exhibit
`resistance to human serum.
`Green et al. ** conducted immunostaining for RD114 receptors,
`which were present in the colon,testis, bone marrow,skeletal
`muscle and skin epithelia. However, the receptors are absent in
`the lung, thyroid and artery, suggesting that the application of
`RD114-pseudotyped vectors to treat some diseases may be
`limited. By comparison, VSV-G pseudotyped lentiviral vectors
`have potential for broad tropism.”*
`In this study, we evolved VSV-G and successfully created
`variants with higher resistance to human, rabbit and mouse sera
`in vitro and human serum in vivo. This work therefore further
`establishes the power of directed evolution to improve viral
`
`=mm4s 1.0E+05
`
`WT
`
`$162T, T230N
`
`T230N, T368A
`
`
`
`Titer(TU/ml)
`
`lines with retroviral
`/n vitro transduction of multiple cell
`Figure 7.
`vectors pseudotyped with VSV-G variants. Retroviral vectors expres-
`sing GFP were used to transduce a panel of cell
`lines: HEK 293T,
`HT1080 (human fibrosarcoma cell
`line), CHO K1, NIH 3T3 (mouse
`embryonic fibroblast
`cell
`line), and HeLa cells to assess
`the
`transduction profile of the novel VSV-G variants. Error bars denote
`s.d.
`(n=3).
`**
`indicates
`statistical differences of P<0.01,
`as
`determined using an one-way ANOVA,
`
`this case could aid future efforts to investigate mechanisms of
`retroviral or lentiviral vector inactivation by complement.
`As a byproduct of the evolution, mutations that enhanced the
`thermal
`stability of VSV-G were also identified, which can
`potentially enhance vector production and reduce the dosage of
`
`Gene Therapy (2013) 807-815
`
`© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`

`

`vectors, and these results may enhance the utility of retroviral and
`jentiviral vectors to treat human disease. In addition, VSV itself has
`emerged as a promising candidate in the field of oncolytic virus
`therapy. Therefore, incorporating a VSV variant encoding a human
`serum-resistant and thermostable VSV-G may enhance the thera-
`peutic potential of VSV for treating human cancer.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Library construction and selection
`Random mutagenesis libraries were generated by standard error-prone
`PCR of a VSV-G template using VSV-G fwd and VSV-G rev as primers (see
`Supplementary Table S1
`for all primer sequences). The amplified PCR
`fragments were digested with Sf | and Xho|, and the resulting fragments
`were ligated into the corresponding sites of the retroviral vector pCLPIT,
`which contains a puromycin resistance gene and places VSV-G under a
`tetracycline responsive promoter.
`HEK 2937 cells were cultured in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium
`supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Calrsbad, CA, USA)
`and 1%penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37 C and 5% CO,. The VSV-
`G library was packaged into retroviral vectors via calcium phosphate
`transfection of 62.5ng of pCLPIT

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket