throbber
United States Patent
`US 10,028,464 B1
`(10) Patent No.:
`(12)
`Colbertet al.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Jul, 24, 2018
`
`
`US010028464B1
`
`9/2016 Curran etal.
`9,445,572 Bl
`10/2016 Smalley et al.
`9,456,566 Bl
`10/2016 Hoffbeck et al.
`9,456,570 Bl
`11/2016 Carloneet al.
`9,504,221 Bl
`2013/0291219 A1* 10/2013 Larkins ......ccccee AOLH 5/10
`800/275
`3/2014 Waycott oo... AOIH 5/12
`426/615
`8/2014 Corona, IID... CIID 1/02
`8/137
`8/2014 Haroun .ecccssccse BOLJ 8/0492
`208/108
`8/2014 Darnaud. ............ CO8K 3/36
`523/156
`
`2014/0224707 AL*
`
`2014/0228479 A1*
`
`2014/0072693 AL*
`
`2014/0223669 Al*
`
`(54) MAIZE HYBRID X15K728
`.
`.
`(71) Applicant: PIONEER HI-BRED
`INTERNATIONAL,INC., Johnston,
`IA (US)
`
`(72)
`
`Inventors: Terry R Colbert, Dyersburg, TN (US),
`:
`:
`Nicholas Adam Crowley, Evansville,
`IN (US); Charles Thomas
`Cunnyngham, Tipton, IN (US); Mark
`Jacob Gadlage, Dyersburg, TN (US);
`Daniel Preston Gorman, Tallahassee,
`FL (US); Randall Newton Holley,
`Henderson, KY (US); Daniel Joseph
`Pohl, Princeton, IN (US); Jennifer Ann
`Steinke, Champaign, IL (US); Luis A
`Verde Chifflet, Johnston, IA (US)
`
`:
`(73) Assignee: PIONEER HI-BRED
`INTERNATIONAL, INC., Johnston,
`JA (US)
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`US.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 15/447,428
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Mar. 2, 2017
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`(2018.01)
`AOLH 5/10
`(2006.01)
`AOLH 1/02
`(2006.01)
`CIDN 15/82
`(2006.01)
`CI2N 15/10
`CPC veces AO1H 5/10 (2013.01); AOIH 102
`(2013.01); CI2N 15/1003 (2013.01); C12N
`15/8243 (2013.01); CI2N 15/8245 (2013.01);
`C1I2N 15/8246 (2013.01); CI2N 15/8247
`(2013.01); CI2N 15/8251 (2013.01); C12N
`15/8274 (2013.01); CI2N 15/8279 (2013.01);
`C1I2N 15/8286 (2013.01); CI2N 15/8289
`(2013.01)
`
`(58) Field of Classification Search
`None
`See application file for complete search history.
`.
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`(56)
`
`8,383,883 BI*
`
`2/2013 Kevern oe AO1H 5/10
`800/260
`
`8,907,160 Bl
`9,084,408 BI
`9,226,468 Bl
`9,277,707 Bl
`9,282,702 Bl
`9,307,718 Bl
`9,326,471 Bl
`9,326,475 Bl
`9,374,963 Bl
`9,374,964 Bl
`9,398,751 Bl
`9,426,959 Bl
`
`12/2014 Verde Chifflet
`7/2015 Cooperet al.
`1/2016 Carloneet al.
`3/2016 Verde Chifflet et al.
`3/2016 Kilgore-Norquest et al.
`4/2016 Verde Chifflet et al.
`5/2016 Verde Chifflet et al.
`5/2016 Rosset al.
`6/2016 Fischer et al.
`6/2016 Henkeet al.
`7/2016 Fischer et al.
`8/2016 Henkeet al.
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Fehr; “Backcross Method” (1987) Iowa State University, “Prin-
`ciples of Cultivar Development,” vol. 1 Theory and Technique and.
`vol. 2 Crop Species, Soybean, Macmillian Publishing Company,
`New York; pp. 360-376.*
`The British Dictionary (via Websters.com) definition for “essen-
`tially”; downloaded from the world wide web in 2014; p. | of 1.*
`Moore, M. “A shallow gene pool” (2008) in Farm Industry News;
`ae
`pp.
`1-3.
`soen No. 15/447,398 for Maize Inbred PH240F;filed Mar. 2,
`US Plant Variety Protection Certificate No. 201300302 for Maize
`Inbred PH1VST; issued Sep. 11, 2014.
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/086,145 for Maize Hybrid X08H760; filed Mar.
`31, 2016
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/086,167 for Maize Hybrid X13H943; filed Mar.
`31, 2016
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/086,178 for Maize Hybrid X08H816; filed Mar.
`31, 2016
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/086,268 for Maize Hybrid X13H922; filed Mar.
`31, 2016
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/086,279 for Maize Hybrid X13H891; filed Mar.
`31, 2016
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/086,282 for Maize Hybrid X05H238;filed Mar.
`US. Appl. No. 15/086,288 for Maize Hybrid X05H233; filed Mar.
`31, 2016
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/447,431 for Maize Hybrid X13K545; filed Mar.
`2, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner — Cathy Kingdon Worley
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Pioneer Hi-Bred Int’1,
`Inc.
`
`ABSTRACT
`(57)
`Anovel maize variety designated X15K728 and seed, plants
`and plant parts thereof are produced by crossing inbred
`maize varieties. Methods for producing a maize plant by
`crossing hybrid maize variety X15K728 with another maize
`plant are disclosed. Methods for producing a maize plant
`containing in its genetic material one or moretraits intro-
`gressed into X15K728 through backcross conversion and/or
`transformation, and to the maize seed, plant and plant part
`producedthereby. This invention relates to the maize variety
`X15K728, the seed, the plant produced from the seed, and
`variants, mutants, and minor modifications of maize variety
`X15K728. This invention further relates to methods for
`producing maize varieties derived from maize variety
`X15K728.
`
`20 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Inari v. Pioneer
`
`Inari Exhibit 1066
`Inari Exhibit 1066
`Inari v. Pioneer
`
`

`

`US 10,028,464 B1
`Page 2
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/447,445 for Maize Hybrid X08K266;filed Mar.
`2, 2017.
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/447,451 for Maize Hybrid X08H786;filed Mar.
`2, 2017.
`U.S. Appl. No. 15/447,479 for Maize Hybrid X05K734;filed Mar.
`2, 2017.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`

`

`US 10,028,464 B1
`
`1
`MAIZE HYBRID X15K728
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`2
`inherited trait is the male sterility trait. Cytoplasmic-male
`sterility (CMS)is a pollen abortion phenomenondetermined
`by the interaction between the genes in the cytoplasm and
`the nucleus. Alteration in the mitochondrial genome and the
`lack of restorer genes in the nucleus will lead to pollen
`abortion. With either a normal cytoplasm or the presence of
`restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, the plant will produce pollen
`normally. A CMSplant can be pollinated by a maintainer
`version of the same variety, which has a normal cytoplasm
`but lacks the restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, and continues
`to be male sterile in the next generation. The male fertility
`of a CMSplant can be restored by a restorer version of the
`same variety, which must have the restorer gene(s) in the
`nucleus. With the restorer gene(s) in the nucleus, the off-
`spring of the male-sterile plant can produce normal pollen
`grains and propagate. A cytoplasmically inherited trait may
`be a naturally occurring maize trait or a trait introduced
`through genetic transformation techniques.
`A tissue culture of regenerable cells of a plant of variety
`X15K728 is provided. The tissue culture can be capable of
`regenerating plants capable of expressing all of the physi-
`ological and morphological or phenotypic characteristics of
`the variety and of regenerating plants having substantially
`the same genotypeas other plants of the variety. Examples
`of some of the physiological and morphological character-
`istics of the variety X15K728 that may be assessed include
`characteristics related to yield, maturity, and kernel quality.
`The regenerable cells in such tissue cultures can be derived,
`for example, from embryos, meristematic cells, immature
`tassels, microspores, pollen, leaves, anthers, roots, root tips,
`silk, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, husks, or stalks, or from
`callus or protoplasts derived from those tissues. Maize
`plants regenerated from the tissue cultures and plants having
`The hybrid maize plant may further comprise a cytoplas-
`all or essentially all of the physiological and morphological
`mic or nuclear factor capable of conferring male sterility or
`characteristics of variety X15K728 are also provided.
`otherwise preventing self-pollination, such as by self-incom-
`A method of producing hybrid maize seed comprising
`patibility. Parts of the maize plants disclosed herein are also
`crossing a plant of variety PH240F with a plant of variety
`provided, for example, pollen obtained from an hybrid plant
`PH1V5T. In a cross, either parent may serve as the male or
`and an ovule of the hybrid plant.
`female. Processes are also provided for producing maize
`Seed of the hybrid maize variety X15K728 is provided
`seeds or plants, which processes generally comprise cross-
`and maybe provided as a population of maize seed of the
`ing a first parent maize plant as a male or female parent with
`variety designated X15K728.
`a second parent maize plant, wherein at least one of the first
`Compositions are provided comprising a seed of maize
`or second parent maize plants is a plant of the variety
`variety X15K728 comprised in plant seed growth media. In
`designated X15K728. In such crossing, either parent may
`certain embodiments, the plant seed growth media is a soil
`serve as the male or female parent. These processes may be
`or synthetic cultivation medium. In specific embodiments,
`the growth medium may be comprised in a container or may,
`further exemplified as processes for preparing hybrid maize
`
`for example, be soil inafield. seed or plants, wherein a first hybrid maize plant is crossed
`Hybrid maize variety X15K728 is provided comprising an
`with a second maize plant of a different, distinct variety to
`added heritable trait. The heritable trait may be a genetic
`provide a hybrid that has, as one of its parents, the hybrid
`locus that
`is a dominant or recessive allele. In certain
`maize plant variety X15K728. In these processes, crossing
`will result in the production of seed. The seed production
`occurs regardless of whether the seed is collected or not.
`In some embodiments, the first step in “crossing” com-
`prises planting, often in pollinating proximity, seeds ofa first
`and second parent maize plant, and in manycases, seeds of
`a first maize plant and a second, distinct maize plant. Where
`the plants are not in pollinating proximity, pollination can
`nevertheless be accomplished by other means, such as by
`transferring a pollen or tassel bag from oneplantto the other.
`A second step comprises cultivating or growing the seeds
`of said first and second parent maize plants into plants that
`bear flowers (maize bears both male flowers (tassels) and
`female flowers (silks) in separate anatomical structures on
`the same plant).
`A third step comprises preventing self-pollination of the
`plants,
`i.e., preventing the silks of a plant from being
`fertilized by any plant of the same variety, including the
`
`embodiments, the genetic locus confers traits such as, for
`example, male sterility, waxy starch, herbicide tolerance or
`resistance, insect resistance, resistance to bacterial, fungal,
`nematodeorviral disease, and altered or modified fatty acid,
`phytate, protein or carbohydrate metabolism. The genetic
`locus may be a naturally occurring maize gene introduced
`into the genomeofa parent of the variety by backcrossing,
`a natural or induced mutation, or a transgene introduced
`through genetic transformation techniques. When intro-
`duced through transformation, a genetic locus may comprise
`one or more transgenes integrated at a single chromosomal
`location.
`Ahybrid maize plant of the variety designated X15K728
`is provided, wherein a cytoplasmically-inherited trait has
`been introducedinto the hybrid plant. Such cytoplasmically-
`inherited traits are passed to progeny through the female
`parent in a particular cross. An exemplary cytoplasmically-
`
`The goal of hybrid developmentis to combine,in a single
`hybrid, various desirable traits. For field crops, these traits
`may includeresistance to diseases and insects, resistance to
`heat and drought, reducing the time to crop maturity, greater
`yield, and better agronomic quality. With mechanical har-
`vesting of many crops, uniformity of plant characteristics
`such as germination, stand establishment, growth rate, matu-
`rity, and plant and ear height is important. Traditional plant
`breeding is an important
`tool
`in developing new and
`improved commercial crops.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`Provided is a novel maize, Zea mays L., variety, seed,
`plant, cells and its parts designated as X15K728, produced
`by crossing two maize inbred varieties. The hybrid maize
`variety X15K728, the seed, the plant andits parts produced
`from the seed, and variants, mutants and minor modifica-
`tions of maize X15K728 are provided. Processes are pro-
`vided for making a maize plant containing in its genetic
`material one or more traits introgressed into X15K728
`through locus conversion, backcrossing and/or transforma-
`tion, and to the maize seed, plant and plant parts produced
`thereby. Methods for producing maize varieties derived
`from hybrid maize variety X15K728 are also provided. Also
`provided are maize plants having all the physiological and
`morphological characteristics of the hybrid maize variety
`X15K728.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`

`

`US 10,028,464 B1
`
`3
`same plant. This can be done, for example, by emasculating
`the male flowers of the first or second parent maize plant,
`(i.e., treating or manipulating the flowers so as to prevent
`pollen production, in order to produce an emasculated parent
`maizeplant). Self-incompatibility systems may also be used
`in some hybrid crops for the same purpose. Self-incompat-
`ible plantsstill shed viable pollen and can pollinate plants of
`other varieties but are incapable of pollinating themselves or
`other plants of the same variety.
`A fourth step may comprise allowing cross-pollination to
`occur between the first and second parent maize plants.
`Whenthe plants are notin pollinating proximity, this can be
`done by placing a bag, usually paper or glassine, over the
`tassels of the first plant and another bag overthe silks of the
`incipient ear on the secondplant. The bagsare left in place
`for at least 24 hours. Since pollen is viable for less than 24
`hours, this assures that the silks are not pollinated from other
`pollen sources, that any stray pollen on the tassels ofthe first
`plant is dead, and that the only pollen transferred comes
`from the first plant. The pollen bag overthe tassel of thefirst
`plant is then shaken vigorously to enhancerelease of pollen
`from thetassels, and the shoot bag is removed from the silks
`of the incipient ear on the second plant. Finally, the pollen
`bag is removed from thetasselofthefirst plant and is placed
`overthe silks of the incipient ear of the secondplant, shaken
`again andleft in place. Yet another step comprises harvest-
`ing the seeds from at least one of the parent maize plants.
`The harvested seed can be grown to produce a maize plant
`or hybrid maize plant.
`Maize seed and plants are provided that are produced by
`a process that comprises crossing a first parent maize plant
`with a second parent maize plant, wherein at least one of the
`first or second parent maize plants is a plant of the variety
`designated X15K728. Maize seed and plants produced by
`the process are first generation hybrid maize seed and plants
`producedby crossing an inbred with another, distinct inbred.
`Seed of an F1 hybrid maize plant, an F1 hybrid maize plant
`and seed thereof, specifically the hybrid variety designated
`X15K728 is provided.
`Plants described herein can be analyzed bytheir “genetic
`complement.” This term is used to refer to the aggregate of
`nucleotide sequences, the expression of which defines the
`phenotype of, for example, a maize plant, or a cell or tissue
`of that plant. A genetic complement thus represents the
`genetic make up of an cell, tissue or plant. Provided are
`maize plant cells that have a genetic complement in accor-
`dance with the maize plant cells disclosed herein, and plants,
`seeds and diploid plants containing suchcells.
`Plant genetic complements may be assessed by genetic
`markerprofiles, and by the expression of phenotypic traits
`that are characteristic of the expression of the genetic
`complement, e.g., isozyme typing profiles. It is understood
`that variety X15K728 could be identified by any of the many
`well-known techniques used for genetic profiling disclosed
`herein.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`A new anddistinctive maize hybrid variety designated
`X15K728, which has been the result of years of careful
`breeding and selection in a comprehensive maize breeding
`program is provided.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`Maize, Zea mays L., can be referred to as maize or corn.
`Certain definitions used in the specification are provided
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`below. Also in the examples that follow, a number of terms
`are used herein. In order to provide a clear and consistent
`understanding of the specification and claims, including the
`scope to be given such terms, the following definitions are
`provided. NOTE: ABS is in absolute terms and % MN is
`percent of the mean for the experiments in which the inbred
`or hybrid was grown. PCT designates that
`the trait
`is
`calculated as a percentage. % NOT designates the percent-
`age of plants that did not exhibit a trait. For example,
`STKLDG % NOTis the percentage of plants in a plot that
`were not stalk lodged. These designators will follow the
`descriptors to denote how the values are to be interpreted.
`Below are the descriptors used in the data tables included
`herein.
`ABIOTIC STRESS TOLERANCE: resistance to non-
`biological sources of stress conferred by traits such as
`nitrogen utilization efficiency, altered nitrogen responsive-
`ness, drought resistance, cold, and salt resistance
`ABTSTK=ARTIFICIAL BRITTLE STALK:A count of
`
`the numberof “snapped”plants per plot following machine
`snapping. A snapped planthasits stalk completely snapped
`at a node betweenthe base of the plant and the node above
`the ear. Expressed as percent of plants that did not snap.
`ALLELE: Any of one or more alternative forms of a
`genetic sequence. In a diploid cell or organism, the two
`alleles of a given sequence typically occupy corresponding
`loci on a pair of homologous chromosomes.
`ALTER: The utilization of up-regulation, down-regula-
`tion, or gene silencing.
`ANTHESIS: The time of a flower’s opening.
`ANTIOXIDANT: A chemical compound or substance
`that inhibits oxidation, including but not limited to tocoph-
`erol or tocotrienols.
`
`ANT ROT=ANTHRACNOSE STALK ROT (Colletotri-
`chum graminicola): A 1
`to 9 visual rating indicating the
`resistance to Anthracnose Stalk Rot. A higher score indicates
`a higher resistance. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`BACKCROSSING:Process in which a breeder crosses a
`hybrid progeny variety back to one ofthe parental genotypes
`one or more times.
`BACKCROSS PROGENY:Progeny plants produced by
`crossing one maize line (recurrent parent) with plants of
`another maize line (donor) that comprise a desired trait or
`locus, selecting progeny plants that comprise the desired
`trait or locus, and crossing them with the recurrent parent 1
`or more times to produce backcross progeny plants that
`comprise said trait or locus.
`BARPLT=BARREN PLANTS: Thepercent of plants per
`plot that were not barren (lack ears).
`BLUP=BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION.The
`BLUPvalues are determined from a mixed model analysis
`of hybrid performance observations at various locations and
`replications. BLUP values for inbred maize plants, breeding
`values, are estimated from the same analysis using pedigree
`information.
`BORBMN=ARTIFICIAL BRITTLE STALK MEAN:
`
`The mean percentofplants not “snapped”in a plot following
`artificial selection pressure. A snapped plant has its stalk
`completely snapped at a node betweenthe base of the plant
`and the node above the ear. Expressed as percent of plants
`that did not snap. A higher numberindicates better tolerance
`to brittle snapping.
`BRENGMN=BRITTLE STALK ENERGY MEAN: The
`
`mean amount of energy per unit area neededto artificially
`brittle snap a corn stalk. A higher numberindicates better
`tolerance to brittle snapping.
`
`

`

`US 10,028,464 B1
`
`5
`BREEDING:The genetic manipulation of living organ-
`isms.
`
`BREEDING CROSS: A cross to introduce new genetic
`material into a plant for the development of a new variety.
`For example, one could cross plant A with plant B, wherein
`plant B would be genetically different from plant A. After
`the breeding cross, the resulting F1 plants could then be
`selfed or sibbed for one, two, three or more times (F1, F2,
`F3, etc.) until a new inbred variety is developed.
`BRLPNE=ARTIFICIAL ROOT LODGING EARLY
`
`SEASON:The percent of plants not root lodged in a plot
`following artificial selection pressure applied prior to flow-
`ering. A plant is considered root lodged if it leans from the
`vertical axis at an approximately 30 degree angle or greater.
`Expressed as percent of plants that did not root lodge. A
`higher numberindicates higher tolerance to root lodging.
`BRLPNL=ARTIFICIAL ROOT LODGING LATE SEA-
`
`lodged in a plot
`SON: The percent of plants not root
`following artificial selection pressure during grain fill. A
`plant is considered root lodged if it leans from the vertical
`axis at an approximately 30 degree angle or greater.
`Expressed as percent of plants that did not root lodge. A
`higher numberindicates higher tolerance to root lodging.
`BRTSTK=BRITTLE STALKS: This is a measure of the
`stalk breakage near the time of pollination, and is an
`indication of whether a hybrid or inbred would snap or break
`near the time of flowering under severe winds. Data are
`presented as percentage of plants that did not snap. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`BRTPCN=BRITTLE STALKS: This is an estimate of the
`stalk breakage near the time of pollination, and is an
`indication of whether a hybrid or inbred would snap or break
`near the time of flowering under severe winds. Data are
`presented as percentage of plants that did not snap. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`CARBOHYDRATE: Organic compounds comprising
`carbon, oxygen and hydrogen,
`including sugars, starches
`and cellulose.
`CELL: Cell as used herein includes a plant cell, whether
`isolated, in tissue culture or incorporated in a plant or plant
`part.
`CLDTST=COLD TEST: The percent of plants that ger-
`minate under cold test conditions.
`CLN=CORN LETHAL NECROSIS: Synergistic interac-
`tion of maize chlorotic mottle virus (MCMV)in combina-
`tion with either maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV-A or
`MDMV-B)or wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV). A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to Corn Lethal Necro-
`sis. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`CMSMT=COMMON SMUT:This is the percentage of
`plants not infected with Common Smut. Data are collected
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`COMRST=COMMONRUST(Puccinia sorghi): A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to Common Rust. A
`higher score indicates a higherresistance. Data are collected
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`6
`but also including protoplast fusion and other molecular
`biology methods of combining genetic material from two
`sources.
`
`D and D1-Dn:represents the generation of doubled hap-
`loid.
`
`D/D=DRYDOWN:This represents the relative rate at
`which a hybrid will reach acceptable harvest moisture
`compared to other hybrids on a 1 to 9 rating scale. A high
`score indicates a hybrid thatdries relatively fast while a low
`score indicates a hybrid that dries slowly.
`DIGENG=DIGESTIBLE ENERGY:Near-infrared trans-
`
`mission spectroscopy, NIT, prediction of digestible energy.
`DIPERS=DIPLODIA EAR MOLD SCORES (Diplodia
`maydis and Diplodia macrospora): A 1 to 9 visual rating
`indicating the resistance to Diplodia Ear Mold. A higher
`score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected only
`when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment
`measured.
`
`DIPLOID PLANTPART:Refersto a plant part or cell that
`has a same diploid genotype.
`DIPROT=DIPLODIA STALK ROT SCORE: Score of
`stalk rot severity due to Diplodia (Diplodia maydis).
`Expressed as a 1 to 9 score with 9 being highly resistant.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`DRPEAR=DROPPED EARS: A measure of the number
`of dropped ears per plot and represents the percentage of
`plants that did not drop ears prior to harvest. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`D/T=DROUGHT TOLERANCE: This represents a 1 to 9
`rating for drought tolerance, and is based on data obtained
`understress conditions. A high score indicates good drought
`tolerance and a low score indicates poor droughttolerance.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`EARHT=EAR HEIGHT: The ear height is a measure
`from the ground to the highest placed developed ear node
`attachment and is measured in inches.
`
`EARMLD=GENERAL EAR MOLD: Visual rating (1 to
`9 score) where a 1
`is very susceptible and a 9 is very
`resistant. This is based on overall rating for ear mold of
`mature ears without determining the specific mold organism,
`and maynot be predictive for a specific ear mold. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`EARSZ=EARSIZE: A 1 to 9 visual rating of ear size. The
`higher the rating the larger the ear size.
`EBTSTK=EARLY BRITTLE STALK: A count of the
`
`numberof “snapped”plants per plot following severe winds
`when the corn plant is experiencing very rapid vegetative
`growth in the V5-V8 stage. Expressed as percent of plants
`that did not snap. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`ECB1 LF=EUROPEAN CORN BORER FIRST GEN-
`
`ERATION LEAF FEEDING (Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to preflowering leaf
`feeding by first generation European Corn Borer. A higher
`score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected only
`when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment
`measured.
`ECB2IT=EUROPEAN CORN BORER SECOND GEN-
`
`CROSS POLLINATION:Fertilization by the union of
`two gametes from different plants.
`CROSSING: The combination of genetic material by
`traditional methods such as a breeding cross or backcross,
`
`65
`
`ERATION INCHES OF TUNNELING(Ostrinia nubilalis):
`Average inches of tunneling per plant in the stalk. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`
`

`

`US 10,028,464 B1
`
`7
`ECB2SC=EUROPEAN CORN BORER SECOND GEN-
`
`ERATION (Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9 visual rating indi-
`cating post flowering degree of stalk breakage and other
`evidence of feeding by second generation European Corn
`Borer. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`ECBDPE=EUROPEAN CORN BORER DROPPED
`
`EARS (Ostrinia nubilalis): Dropped ears due to European
`Corn Borer. Percentage ofplants that did not drop ears under
`second generation European Corn Borer infestation. Data
`are collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in
`the experiment measured.
`ECBLSI=EUROPEAN CORN BORER LATE SEASON
`
`INTACT(Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9 visual rating indicat-
`ing late season intactness of the corn plant given damage
`(stalk breakage above and below the top ear) caused pri-
`marily by 2” and/or 3” generation ECB larval feeding
`before harvest. A higher score is good and indicates more
`intact plants. Data are collected only when sufficient selec-
`tion pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`EGRWTH=EARLY GROWTH: This is a measure of the
`
`relative height and size of a cor seedling at the 2-4 leaf
`stage of growth. This is a visual rating (1 to 9), with 1 being
`weak or slow growth, 5 being average growth and 9 being
`strong growth. Taller plants, wider leaves, more green mass
`and darker color constitute higher score. Data are collected
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`
`ERTLDG=EARLY ROOT LODGING:Thepercentage of
`plants that do not root lodge prior to or around anthesis;
`plants that lean from the vertical axis at an approximately 30
`degree angle or greater would be counted as root lodged.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`ERTLPN=EARLY ROOT LODGING:An estimate of the
`percentage of plants that do not root lodgeprior to or around
`anthesis; plants that lean from the vertical axis at an approxi-
`mately 30 degree angle or greater would be considered as
`root lodged. Data are collected only when sufficient selec-
`tion pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`ERTLSC=EARLY ROOT LODGING SCORE:Score for
`
`lean from a vertical axis at an
`severity of plants that
`approximate 30 degree angle or greater which typically
`results from strong winds prior to or around flowering
`recorded within 2 weeks of a wind event. Expressed as a 1
`to 9 score with 9 being no lodging. Data are collected only
`when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment
`measured.
`ESSENTIAL AMINO ACIDS: Amino acids that cannot
`be synthesized by an organism and therefore must be sup-
`plied in the diet.
`ESTCNT=EARLY STAND COUNT:This is a measure of
`
`the stand establishment in the spring and represents the
`numberofplants that emerge on perplot basis for the inbred
`or hybrid.
`EXPRESSING: Having the genetic potential such that
`under the right conditions, the phenotypic trait is present.
`EXTSTR=EXTRACTABLE STARCH: Near-infrared
`transmission spectroscopy, NIT, prediction of extractable
`starch.
`EYESPT=EYE SPOT(Kabatiella zeae or Aureobasidium
`zeae): A1 to 9 visual rating indicating the resistance to Eye
`Spot. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`8
`FATTY ACID: A carboxylic acid (or organic acid), often
`with a long aliphatic tail (long chains), either saturated or
`unsaturated.
`
`F1 PROGENY:A progeny plant produced by crossing a
`plant of one maize line with a plant of another maize line.
`FUSERS=FUSARIUM EAR ROT SCORE (Fusarium
`moniliforme or Fusarium subglutinans): A 1
`to 9 visual
`rating indicating the resistance to Fusarium Ear Rot. A
`higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected
`only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`
`GDU=GROWING DEGREE UNITS: Using the Barger
`Heat Unit Theory, which assumes that maize growth occurs
`in the temperature range 50 degrees F.-86 degrees F. andthat
`temperatures outside this range slow down growth;
`the
`maximum daily heat unit accumulation is 36 and the mini-
`mum daily heat unit accumulation is 0. The seasonal accu-
`mulation of GDU is a major factor in determining maturity
`zones.
`
`GDUSHD=GDU TO SHED: The number of growing
`degree units (GDUs) or heat units required for an inbred
`variety or hybrid to have approximately 50 percent of the
`plants shedding pollen and is measured from the time of
`planting. Growing degree units are calculated by the Barger
`Method, where the heat units for a 24-hour period are:
`
`GDU
`
`(Max.
`
`temp.+Min.
`2
`
`temp.)
`
`50
`
`The units determined by the Barger Method are then
`divided by 10. The highest maximum temperature used is 86
`degrees F. and the lowest minimum temperature used is 50
`degrees F. For each inbred or hybrid it takes a certain
`number of GDUsto reach various stages of plant develop-
`ment.
`
`GDUSLK=GDU TO SILK: The number of growing
`degree units required for an inbred variety or hybrid to have
`approximately 50 percent of the plants with silk emergence
`from time of planting. Growing degree units are calculated
`by the Barger Method as given in GDUSHDdefinition and
`then divided by 10.
`GENE SILENCING:Theinterruption or suppression of
`the expression of a gene at the level of transcription or
`translation.
`
`GENOTYPE: Refers to the genetic mark-up or profile of
`a cell or organism.
`GIBERS=GIBBERELLA EAR ROT (PINK MOLD)
`(Gibberella zeae): A 1
`to 9 visual rating indicating the
`resistance to Gibberella Ear Rot. A higher score indicates a
`higher resistance. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`GIBROT=G/BBERELLA STALK ROT SCORE: Score of
`stalk rot severity due to Gibberella (Gibberella zeae).
`Expressed as a 1 to 9 score with 9 being highly resistant.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`GLFSPT=GRAY LEAF SPOT (Cercospora zeae-may-
`dis): A 1 to 9 visual rating indicating the resistance to Gray
`Leaf Spot. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data
`are collected only when sufficient selection pressure exists in
`the experiment measured.
`(Corynebacterium
`WILT
`GOSWLT=GOSS’
`nebraskense): A 1 to 9 visual rating indicating the resistance
`to Goss’ Wilt. A higher score indicates a higher resistance.
`
`

`

`US 10,028,464 B1
`
`9
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`GRAIN TEXTURE:A visual rating used to indicate the
`appearance of mature grain observed in the middle third of
`the uppermost ear when well developed. Grain or seed with
`a hard grain texture is indicated as flint; grain or seed with
`a soft grain texture is indicted as dent. Medium grain or seed
`texture may be indicatedas flint-dent or intermediate. Other
`grain textures include flint-like, dent-like, sweet, pop, waxy
`and flour.
`to 9
`GRNAPP=GRAIN APPEARANCE: This is a 1
`rating for the general appearance of the shelled

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket