throbber
United States Patent
`US 9,699,995 BI
`(10) Patent No.:
`(12)
`Henkeetal.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Jul, 11, 2017
`
`
`US009699995B1
`
`(54) MAIZE HYBRID X08F037
`
`(71) Applicant: PIONEER HI-BRED
`INTERNATIONALINC. Johnston. IA
`>
`>
`(US)
`
`(72)
`
`Inventors: Gary Edward Henke, Marshall, MO
`(US); Sara Jane Lira, Adel, IA (US);
`Elliot Lee Heffner, Des Moines,
`IA
`.
`’
`fi
`>
`(US); Luis A Verde Chifflet, Johnston,
`IA (US); Russell Fox, Stuart, [A (US);
`Matthew David Smalley, Urbandale,
`1A (US); Dennis James Dolan, York,
`NE (US)
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`(73) Assignee: PIONEER HI-BRED
`INTERNATIONAL, INC., Johnston,
`JA (US)
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`rec Fesot adjusted under 35
`“— (b)
`by
`ays.
`(21) Appl. No.: 14/623,623
`— ,
`Filed:
`Feb. 17. 2015
`,
`Related U.S. Application Data
`.
`.
`(60) Provisional application No. 61/948,695, filed on Mar.
`6, 2014.
`
`(22)
`
`(51)
`
`Int. CL
`AOIH 5/10
`(2006.01)
`C120 1/68
`(2006.01)
`ee On 0
`(
`01)
`_ CRN 15/82
`(2006.01)
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`CPC veces AOIH 5/10 (2013.01); AOLH 1/02
`(2013.01); AOIH 1/08 (2013.01); C12N
`15/8245 (2013.01); C12N 15/8247 (2013.01);
`CI2N 15/8251 (2013.01); CI2N 15/8271
`(2013.01); C12N 15/8274 (2013.01); C12N
`15/8279 (2013.01); C12N 15/8286 (2013.01);
`CI2N 15/8289 (2013.01); C12Q 1/6895
`(2013.01); C12Q 2600/156 (2013.01)
`.
`(58) Field of Classification Search
`.
`None
`See application file for complete search history.
`.
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`(56)
`
`8,278,504 BL* 10/2012 Verde Chifflet
`
`7,230,171 B2*
`
`8,258,384 B1*
`
`8,354,577 BL*
`8,847,036 Bl
`8,895,819 BL
`
`9/2012 Verde Chifflet
`
`6/2007 Dolan oe AOILH 5/10
`800/260
`......... AOIII 5/10
`800/260
`......... AOLH 5/10
`800/265
`1/2013 Grote wu 435/320.1
`9/2014 Dolan
`11/2014 Smalley
`
`1/2015 Dolan etal.
`8,937,228 Bl
`2/2015 Smalley et al.
`8,962,949 Bl
`3/2015 Rosset al.
`8,993,859 BI
`4/2015 Smalley et al.
`9,000,277 Bl
`4/2015 Smalley et al.
`9,000,280 Bl
`4/2015. Rossetal.
`9,006,539 BL
`4/2015 Smalley et al.
`9,006,540 Bl
`5/2015 Carlone ctal.
`9,024,152 Bl
`7/2015 Barker et al.
`9,089,101 Bl
`10/2015 Smalleyet al.
`9,161,503 Bl
`2013/0291219 A1* 10/2013 Larkins 0. C1IB 1/00
`800/275
`3/2014 Waycott wo. AO1H 5/12
`426/615
`8/2014 Corona, TIT oe. CUD 1/02
`8/137
`8/2014 Haroun oo... BOLJ 8/0492
`208/108
`8/2014 Darnaud. ose CO8K 3/36
`523/156
`
`2014/0223669 A1l*
`2014/0224707 A1*
`
`2014/0228479 AL*
`
`2014/0072693 Al*
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Fehr “Backcross Method”(1987) Iowa State University, “Principles
`of Cultivar Development,” vol. 1 Theory and Technique and vol. 2
`Crop Species, Soybean, Macmillian Publishing Company, New
`York; pp. 360-376."
`British Dictionary (via Websters.com) defines essentially.*
`Moore “A shallow gene pool” (2008) in Farm Industry News; pp.
`1-3."
`.
`a.
`.
`UPOV Maize—Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness,
`uniformity and stability (2009) International Union for the Protec-
`tion of new Varieties of Plants; pp. 1-62.*
`US Plant Variety Protection Certificate No. 201200324 for Maize
`Variety PHIKTF; issued on Mar. 11, 2014.
`US Plant Variety Protection Certificate No. 201200312 for Maize
`Variety PHICP1; issued Jun. 25, 2014.
`U.S. Appl. No. 14/150,801, filed Jan. 9, 2014.
`U.S. Appl. No. 14/623,542, filed Feb. 17, 2015.
`U.S. Appl. No. 13/765,887, filed Feb. 13, 2013.
`US. Appl. No. 14/150,809,filed Jan. 9, 2014.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Primary Examiner — Cathy Kingdon Worley
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Pioneer Hi-Bred Int’],
`Inc.
`
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`Anovel maize variety designated X08F037 andseed, plants
`and plant parts thereof are produced by crossing inbred
`maize varieties. Methods for producing a maize plant by
`crossing hybrid maize variety XO8F037 with another maize
`plant are disclosed. Methods for producing a maize plant
`containing in its genetic material one or moretraits intro-
`gressed into X08F037 through backcross conversion and/or
`transformation, and to the maize seed, plant and plant part
`produced thereby. This invention relates to the maize variety
`X08F037, the seed, the plant produced from the seed, and
`variants, mutants, and minor modifications of maize variety
`XO8F037. This invention further relates to methods for
`
`producing maize varieties derived from maize variety
`X08F037.
`
`20 Claims, No Drawings
`
` Inari Exhibit 1045
`
`Inari Exhibit 1045
`Inari v. Pioneer
`Inari v. Pioneer
`
`

`

`US 9,699,995 B1
`
`1
`MAIZE HYBRID X08F037
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to
`provisional application Ser. No. 61/948,695 filed Mar. 6,
`2014, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`10
`
`2
`at a node between the base of the plant and the node above
`the ear. Expressed as percent of plants that did not snap.
`ALLELE: Any of one or more alternative forms of a
`genetic sequence. In a diploid cell or organism, the two
`alleles of a given sequence typically occupy corresponding
`loci on a pair of homologous chromosomes.
`ALTER: The utilization of up-regulation, down-regula-
`tion, or gene silencing.
`ANTHESIS: The time of a flower’s opening.
`ANTIOXIDANT: A chemical compound or substance
`that inhibits oxidation, including but not limited to tocoph-
`erol or tocotrienols.
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`ANT ROT=ANTHRACNOSESTALK ROT (Colletotri-
`chum graminicola): A 1
`to 9 visual rating indicating the
`resistance to Anthracnose Stalk Rot. A higher score indicates
`a higher resistance. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`BACKCROSSING:Process in which a breeder crosses a
`The goal of hybrid developmentis to combine,inasingle
`hybrid progeny variety back to one of the parental genotypes
`hybrid, various desirable traits. For field crops, these traits
`one or more times.
`may include resistance to diseases and insects, resistance to
`BACKCROSS PROGENY:Progeny plants produced by
`heat and drought, reducing the time to crop maturity, greater
`crossing one maize line (recurrent parent) with plants of
`yield, and better agronomic quality. With mechanical har-
`another maize line (donor) that comprise a desired trait or
`vesting of many crops, uniformity of plant characteristics
`locus, selecting progeny plants that comprise the desired
`such as germination, stand establishment, growth rate, matu-
`trait or locus, and crossing them with the recurrent parent 1
`rity, and plant and ear height is important. Traditional plant
`or more times to produce backcross progeny plants that
`breeding is an important
`tool
`in developing new and
`comprise said trait or locus.
`improved commercial crops.
`BARPLT=BARREN PLANTS: Thepercent of plants per
`plot that were not barren (lack ears).
`BLUP=BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION.The
`
`This invention relates generally to the field of maize, Zea
`mays L., breeding, specifically relating to hybrid maize
`variety designated X08F037.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`According to the invention, there is provided a novel
`maize, Zea mays L., variety, seed, plant, and its parts
`designated as X0O8F037, produced by crossing two Pioneer
`Hi-Bred International, Inc. proprietary maize inbred variet-
`ies. This invention relates to the hybrid maize variety
`X08FO037 the seed, the plant and its parts produced from the
`seed, and variants, mutants and minor modifications of
`maize X0O8F037. This invention also relates to processes for
`making a maize plant containing in its genetic material one
`or more traits introgressed into XO8F037 through locus
`conversion and/or transformation, and to the maize seed,
`plant and plant parts produced thereby. This invention
`further relates to methods for producing maize varieties
`derived from hybrid maize variety XO8F037.
`Definitions
`
`Certain definitions used in the specification are provided
`below. Also in the examples that follow, a number of terms
`are used herein. In order to provide a clear and consistent
`understanding of the specification and claims, including the
`scope to be given such terms, the following definitions are
`provided. NOTE: ABS is in absolute terms and % MN is
`percent of the mean for the experiments in which the inbred
`or hybrid was grown. PCT designates that
`the trait
`is
`calculated as a percentage. % NOT designates the percent-
`age of plants that did not exhibit a trait. For example,
`STKLDG % NOTis the percentage of plants in a plot that
`were not stalk lodged. These designators will follow the
`descriptors to denote how the values are to be interpreted.
`Below are the descriptors used in the data tables included
`herein.
`ABIOTIC STRESS TOLERANCE: resistance to non-
`
`biological sources of stress conferred by traits such as
`nitrogen utilization efficiency, altered nitrogen responsive-
`ness, drought resistance, cold, and salt resistance
`ABTSTK=ARTIFICIAL BRITTLE STALK: A count of
`the numberof“snapped”plants per plot following machine
`snapping. A snappedplanthasits stalk completely snapped
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`BLUPvalues are determined from a mixed model analysis
`of hybrid performance observations at various locations and
`replications. BLUPvalues for inbred maize plants, breeding
`values, are estimated from the same analysis using pedigree
`information.
`BORBMN=ARTIFICIAL BRITTLE STALK MEAN:
`
`The meanpercentofplants not “snapped”in a plot following
`artificial selection pressure. A snapped plant has its stalk
`completely snapped at a node between the base ofthe plant
`and the node above the ear. Expressed as percent of plants
`that did not snap. A high number is good and indicates
`tolerance to brittle snapping.
`BRENGMN=BRITTLE STALK ENERGY MEAN: The
`
`mean amount of energy per unit area neededto artificially
`brittle snap acorn stalk. A high numberis good andindicates
`tolerance to brittle snapping.
`BREEDING: The genetic manipulation of living organ-
`isms.
`
`BREEDING CROSS:A cross to introduce new genetic
`material into a plant for the development of a new variety.
`For example, one could cross plant A with plant B, wherein
`plant B would be genetically different from plant A. After
`the breeding cross, the resulting F1 plants could then be
`selfed or sibbed for one, two, three or more times (F1, F2,
`F3, etc.) until a new inbred variety is developed.
`BRLPNE=ARTIFICIAL ROOT LODGING EARLY
`
`SEASON:Thepercent of plants not root lodged in a plot
`followingartificial selection pressure applied prior to flow-
`ering. A plant is considered root lodged if it leans from the
`vertical axis at an approximately 30 degree angle or greater.
`Expressedas percentof plants that did not root lodge. A high
`numberis good and indicates tolerance to root lodging.
`BRLPNL=ARTIFICIAL ROOT LODGING LATE SEA-
`
`lodged in a plot
`SON: The percent of plants not root
`following artificial selection pressure during grain fill. A
`plant is considered root lodged if it leans from the vertical
`axis at an approximately 30 degree angle or greater.
`
`

`

`US 9,699,995 B1
`
`3
`Expressed as percentof plants that did not root lodge. A high
`numberis good andindicates tolerance to root lodging.
`BRTSTK=BRITTLE STALKS: This is a measure of the
`
`stalk breakage near the time of pollination, and is an
`indication of whether a hybrid or inbred would snap or break
`near the time of flowering under severe winds. Data are
`presented as percentage of plants that did not snap. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`BRTPCN=BRITTLE STALKS: This is an estimate of the
`stalk breakage near the time of pollination, and is an
`indication of whether a hybrid or inbred would snap or break
`near the time of flowering under severe winds. Data are
`presented as percentage of plants that did not snap. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`CARBOHYDRATE: Organic compounds comprising
`carbon, oxygen and hydrogen,
`including sugars, starches
`and cellulose.
`
`CELL: Cell as used herein includes a plant cell, whether
`isolated, in tissue culture or incorporated in a plant or plant
`part.
`CLDTST=COLD TEST: The percent ofplants that ger-
`minate under cold test conditions.
`
`CLN=CORN LETHAL NECROSIS: Synergistic interac-
`tion of maize chlorotic mottle virus (MCMV)in combina-
`tion with either maize dwarf mosaic virus (MDMV-A or
`MDMV-B)or wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV). A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to Com Lethal Necro-
`sis. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`CMSMT=COMMON SMUT: This is the percentage of
`plants not infected with Common Smut. Data are collected
`only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`
`COMRST=COMMONRUST(Puccinia sorghi): A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to Common Rust. A
`higher score indicates a higherresistance. Data are collected
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`
`CROSS POLLINATION:Fertilization by the union of
`two gametes from different plants.
`CROSSING: The combination of genetic material by
`traditional methods such as a breeding cross or backcross,
`but also including protoplast fusion and other molecular
`biology methods of combining genetic material from two
`sources.
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`D and D1-Dn: represents the generation of doubled hap-
`loid.
`
`50
`
`D/D=DRYDOWN:This represents the relative rate at
`which a hybrid will reach acceptable harvest moisture
`compared to other hybrids on a 1 to 9 rating scale. A high
`score indicates a hybrid that dries relatively fast while a low
`score indicates a hybrid that dries slowly.
`DIGENG=DIGESTIBLE ENERGY:Near-infrared trans-
`
`55
`
`mission spectroscopy, NIT, prediction of digestible energy.
`DIPERS=D/PLODIA EAR MOLD SCORES (Diplodia
`maydis and Diplodia macrospora): A 1 to 9 visual rating
`indicating the resistance to Diplodia Ear Mold. A higher
`score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected only
`when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment
`measured.
`
`DIPLOID PLANTPART:Refers to a plant part or cell that
`has a same diploid genotype.
`DIPROT=DIPLODIA STALK ROT SCORE: Score of
`
`65
`
`4
`Expressed as a 1 to 9 score with 9 being highly resistant.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`DRPEAR=DROPPED EARS: A measure of the number
`
`of dropped ears per plot and represents the percentage of
`plants that did not drop ears prior to harvest. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`D/T=DROUGHT TOLERANCE: This represents a 1 to 9
`rating for drought tolerance, and is based on data obtained
`understress conditions. A high score indicates good drought
`tolerance and a low score indicates poor droughttolerance.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`EARHT=EAR HEIGHT: The ear height is a measure
`from the ground to the highest placed developed ear node
`attachment and is measured in inches.
`
`EARMLD=GENERAL EAR MOLD: Visualrating (1 to
`9 score) where a 1
`is very susceptible and a 9 is very
`resistant. This is based on overall rating for ear mold of
`mature ears without determining the specific mold organism,
`and may notbe predictive for a specific ear mold. Data are
`collected only whensuflicient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`EARSZ=EARSIZE: A 1 to 9 visual rating of ear size. The
`higher the rating the larger the ear size.
`EBTSTK=EARLY BRITTLE STALK: A count of the
`numberof “snapped”plants per plot following severe winds
`when the corn plant is experiencing very rapid vegetative
`growth in the V5-V8 stage. Expressed as percent of plants
`that did not snap. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`ECB1LF=EUROPEAN CORN BORER FIRST GEN-
`
`ERATION LEAF FEEDING (Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9
`visual rating indicating the resistance to preflowering leaf
`feeding by first generation European Corn Borer. A higher
`score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected only
`when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment
`measured.
`ECB2IT=EUROPEAN CORN BORER SECOND GEN-
`
`ERATION INCHES OF TUNNELING(Ostrinia nubilalis):
`Average inches of tunneling per plant in the stalk. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`ECB2SC=EUROPEAN CORN BORER SECOND GEN-
`
`ERATION (Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9 visual rating indi-
`cating post flowering degree of stalk breakage and other
`evidence of feeding by second generation European Corn
`Borer. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`ECBDPE=EUROPEAN CORN BORER DROPPED
`
`EARS(Ostrinia nubilalis): Dropped ears due to European
`Corn Borer. Percentage of plants that did not drop ears under
`second generation European Corn Borer infestation. Data
`are collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in
`the experiment measured.
`ECBLSI=EUROPEAN CORN BORER LATE SEASON
`
`INTACT (Ostrinia nubilalis): A 1 to 9 visual rating indicat-
`ing late season intactness of the corn plant given damage
`(stalk breakage above and below the top ear) caused pri-
`marily by 2” and/or 3” generation ECB larval feeding
`before harvest. A higher score is good and indicates more
`intact plants. Data are collected only when sufficient selec-
`tion pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`EGRWTH=EARLY GROWTH: This is a measure of the
`
`stalk rot severity due to Diplodia (Diplodia maydis).
`
`relative height and size of a corn seedling at the 2-4 leaf
`
`

`

`US 9,699,995 B1
`
`5
`stage of growth. This is a visual rating (1 to 9), with 1 being
`weak or slow growth, 5 being average growth and 9 being
`strong growth. Taller plants, wider leaves, more green mass
`and darker color constitute higher score. Data are collected
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`
`ERTLDG=EARLY ROOT LODGING:Thepercentage of
`plants that do not root lodge prior to or around anthesis;
`plants that lean from the vertical axis at an approximately 30
`degree angle or greater would be counted as root lodged.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`ERTLPN=EARLY ROOT LODGING:An estimate of the
`
`percentageofplants that do not root lodge prior to or around
`anthesis; plants that lean from the vertical axis at an approxi-
`mately 30 degree angle or greater would be considered as
`root lodged. Data are collected only when sufficient selec-
`tion pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`ERTLSC=EARLY ROOT LODGING SCORE:Score for
`
`lean from a vertical axis at an
`severity of plants that
`approximate 30 degree angle or greater which typically
`results from strong winds prior to or around flowering
`recorded within 2 weeks of a wind event. Expressed as a 1
`to 9 score with 9 being no lodging. Data are collected only
`when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment
`measured.
`ESSENTIAL AMINO ACIDS: Amino acids that cannot
`
`be synthesized by an organism and therefore must be sup-
`plied in the diet.
`ESTCNT=EARLY STAND COUNT:Thisis a measure of
`the stand establishment in the spring and represents the
`numberofplants that emerge on perplot basis for the inbred
`or hybrid.
`EXPRESSING: Having the genetic potential such that
`under the right conditions, the phenotypic trait is present.
`EXTSTR=EXTRACTABLE STARCH: Near-infrared
`transmission spectroscopy, NIT, prediction of extractable
`starch.
`EYESPT=EYE SPOT (Kabatiella zeae or Aureobasidium
`zeae): Al to 9 visual rating indicating the resistance to Eye
`Spot. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`FATTY ACID: A carboxylic acid (or organic acid), often
`with a long aliphatic tail (ong chains), either saturated or
`unsaturated.
`
`Fl PROGENY:A progeny plant produced by crossing a
`plant with a plant of another maize line.
`FUSERS=FUSARIUM EAR ROT SCORE (Fusarium
`moniliforme or Fusarium subglutinans): A 1
`to 9 visual
`rating indicating the resistance to Fusarium Ear Rot. A
`higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`ment measured.
`GDU=GROWING DEGREE UNITS: Using the Barger
`Heat Unit Theory, which assumesthat maize growth occurs
`in the temperature range 50 degrees F.-86 degrees F. and that
`temperatures outside this range slow down growth;
`the
`maximum daily heat unit accumulation is 36 and the mini-
`mum daily heat unit accumulation is 0. The seasonal accu-
`mulation of GDU is a major factor in determining maturity
`zones.
`
`GDUSHD=GDU TO SHED: The number of growing
`degree units (GDUs) or heat units required for an inbred
`variety or hybrid to have approximately 50 percent of the
`plants shedding pollen and is measured from the time of
`
`15
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`6
`planting. Growing degree units are calculated by the Barger
`Method, where the heat units for a 24-hour period are:
`
`GDU=(Max. temp.+Min. temp.)—50/2
`
`The units determined by the Barger Method are then
`divided by 10. The highest maximum temperature used is 86
`degrees F. and the lowest minimum temperature used is 50
`degrees F. For each inbred or hybrid it takes a certain
`number of GDUsto reach various stages of plant develop-
`ment.
`
`GDUSLK=GDU TO SILK: The number of growing
`degree units required for an inbred variety or hybrid to have
`approximately 50 percent of the plants with silk emergence
`from time of planting. Growing degree units are calculated
`by the Barger Method as given in GDU SHDdefinition and
`then divided by 10.
`GENE SILENCING:The interruption or suppression of
`the expression of a gene at the level of transcription or
`translation.
`
`
`
`GENOTYPE: Refers to the genetic mark-up or profile of
`a cell or organism.
`GIBERS=G/BBERELLA EAR ROT (PINK MOLD)
`(Gibberella zeae): A 1
`to 9 visual rating indicating the
`resistance to Gibberella Ear Rot. A higher score indicates a
`higher resistance. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`GIBROT=G/BBERELLA STALK ROT SCORE: Score of
`stalk rot severity due to Gibberella (Gibberella zeae).
`Expressed as a 1 to 9 score with 9 being highly resistant.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`GLFSPT=GRAY LEAF SPOT (Cercospora zeae-may-
`dis): A 1 to 9 visual rating indicating the resistance to Gray
`Leaf Spot. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data
`are collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in
`the experiment measured.
`(Corynebacterium
`WILT
`GOSWLT=GOSS’
`nebraskense): A 1 to 9 visual rating indicating the resistance
`to Goss’ Wilt. A higher score indicates a higher resistance.
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`exists in the experiment measured.
`GRNAPP=GRAIN APPEARANCE: This is a 1
`
`to 9
`
`rating for the general appearance ofthe shelled grain asit is
`harvested based on such factors as the color of harvested
`grain, any mold on the grain, and any cracked grain. High
`scores indicate good grain visual quality.
`H and H1: Refers to the haploid generation.
`HAPLOID PLANT PART: Refers to a plant part or cell
`that has a haploid genotype.
`HCBLT=HELMINTHOSPORIUM CARBONUM LEAF
`
`to 9 visual
`BLIGHT (Helminthosporium carbonum): A 1
`rating indicating the resistance to Helminthosporium infec-
`tion. A higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`HD SMT=HEAD SMUT(Sphacelotheca reiliana): This
`indicates the percentage of plants not infected. Data are
`collected only whensufficient selection pressure exists in the
`experiment measured.
`to 9 score based on
`HSKCVR=HUSK COVER: A 1
`performance relative to key checks, with a score of 1
`indicating very short husks, tip of ear and kernels showing;
`5 is intermediate coverage of the ear under most conditions,
`sometimes with thin husk; and a 9 has husks extending and
`closed beyondthe tip of the ear. Scoring can best be done
`near physiological maturity stage or any time during dry
`down until harvested.
`
`

`

`US 9,699,995 B1
`
`8
`through harvest; plants that lean from the vertical axis at an
`approximately 30 degree angle or greater would be consid-
`ered as root lodged. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`LRTLSC=LATE ROOT LODGING SCORE: Score for
`
`lean from a vertical axis at an
`severity of plants that
`approximate 30 degree angle or greater which typically
`results from strong winds after flowering. Recordedprior to
`harvest when a root-lodging event has occurred. This lodg-
`ing results in plants that are leaned or “lodged” over at the
`base of the plant and do notstraighten or “goose-neck” back
`to a vertical position. Expressed as a 1 to 9 score with 9
`being no lodging. Data are collected only when sufficient
`selection pressure exists in the experiment measured.
`MALE STERILITY: A male sterile plant is one which
`produces no viable pollen no (pollen that is able to fertilize
`the egg to produce a viable seed). Male sterility prevents self
`pollination. These male sterile plants are therefore useful in
`hybrid plant production.
`MDMCPX=MAIZE DWARF MOSAIC COMPLEX
`
`(MDMV=Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus and MCDV=Maize
`Chlorotic DwarfVirus). A 1 to 9 visual rating indicating the
`resistance to Maize Dwarf Mosaic Complex. A higher score
`indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected only when
`sufficient selection pressure exists in the experiment mea-
`sured.
`MILKLN=percent milk in mature grain.
`MST=HARVEST MOISTURE: The moisture is
`
`the
`
`7
`HTFRM=Near-infrared transmission spectroscopy, NIT,
`prediction of fermentables.
`HYBRID VARIETY:A substantially heterozygous hybrid
`line and minor genetic modifications thereof that retain the
`overall genetics of the hybrid line including but not limited
`to a locus conversion, a mutation, or a somoclonal variant.
`INBRED: A variety developed through inbreeding or
`doubled haploidy that preferably comprises homozygous
`alleles at about 95% or more of its loci. An inbred can be
`
`reproduced by selfing or growing in isolation so that the
`plants can only pollinate with the same inbred variety.
`INC D/A=GROSS INCOME (DOLLARS PER ACRE):
`Relative incomeper acre assuming drying costs of two cents
`per point above 15.5 percent harvest moisture and current
`market price per bushel.
`INCOME/ACRE: Incomeadvantage of hybrid to be pat-
`ented over other hybrid on peracre basis.
`INC ADV=GROSS INCOME ADVANTAGE: Gross
`
`15
`
`income advantage of variety #1 over variety #2.
`INTROGRESSION:The process of transferring genetic
`material from one genotype to another.
`KERUNT=KERNELSPER UNIT AREA(Acres or Hect-
`ares).
`KERPOP=KERNEL POP SCORE: Thevisual 1-9 rating
`of the amountof rupturing of the kernel pericarp at an early
`stage in grain fill. A higher score is good and indicates no
`popped (ruptured) kernels.
`KER_WT=KERNEL NUMBER PER UNIT WEIGHT
`(Pounds or Kilograms): The number of kernels in a specific
`measured weight; determined after removal of extremely
`small and large kernels.
`KSZDCD=KERNEL SIZE DISCARD: The percent of
`discard seed; calculated as the sum ofdiscarded tip kernels
`and extra-large kernels.
`LINKAGE: Refers to a phenomenon whereinalleles on
`the same chromosometend to segregate together more often
`than expected by chanceif their transmission was indepen-
`dent.
`
`actual percentage moisture of the grain at harvest.
`MSTADV=MOISTURE ADVANTAGE: The moisture
`advantage of variety #1 over variety #2 as calculated by:
`MOISTURE of variety
`#2-MOISTURE of variety
`#1=MOISTURE ADVANTAGEofvariety #1.
`NEI DISTANCE: A quantitative measure of percent simi-
`larity between twovarieties. Nei’s distance between variet-
`ies A and B can be defined as 1-(2*number alleles in
`common/(number alleles in A+numberalleles in B). For
`example, if varieties A and B are the samefor 95 out of 100
`LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM:Refers to a phenomenon
`alleles, the Nei distance would be 0.05. If varieties A and B
`wherein alleles tend to remain together in linkage groups
`are the samefor 98 out of 100 alleles, the Nei distance would
`when segregating from parents to offspring, with a greater
`be 0.02. Free software for calculating Nei distance is avail-
`frequency than expected from their individual frequencies.
`able on the internet at multiple. See Nei, Proc Natl Acad Sci,
`LOCUS: A specific location on a chromosome.
`76:5269-5273 (1979) which is incorporated by reference for
`LOCUS CONVERSION:(Also called TRAIT CONVER-
`this purpose.
`SION) A locus conversion refers to plants within a variety
`that have been modified in a mannerthat retains the overall
`NLFBLT=NORTHERN LEAF BLIGHT (Helminthospo-
`rium turcicum or Exserohilum turcicum): A 1
`to 9 visual
`genetics of the variety and further comprises one or more
`rating indicating the resistance to Northern Leaf Blight. A
`loci with a specific desiredtrait, such as male sterility, insect,
`higher score indicates a higher resistance. Data are collected
`disease or herbicide resistance. Examples of single locus
`only when sufficient selection pressure exists in the experi-
`conversions include mutant genes, transgenes and native
`ment measured.
`traits finely mapped to a single locus. One or more locus
`NUCLEIC ACID: An acidic, chainlike biological macro-
`conversion traits may be introduced into a single corn
`molecule consisting of multiple repeat units of phosphoric
`variety.
`acid, sugar, and purine and pyrimidine bases.
`L/POP=YIELD AT LOW DENSITY: Yield ability at
`OILT=GRAINOIL: Absolute value of oil content of the
`relatively low plant densities on a 1 to 9 relative system with
`kernel as predicted by Near-Infrared Transmittance and
`a higher numberindicating the hybrid responds well to low
`expressed as a percent of dry matter.
`plant densities for yield relative to other hybrids. A 1, 5, and
`PERCENT IDENTITY: Percent identity as used herein
`9 would represent very poor, average, and very good yield
`refers to the comparison of the alleles present
`in two
`response, respectively, to low plant density.
`varieties. For example, when comparing twoinbredplants to
`LRTLDG=LATE ROOT LODGING:The percentage of
`each other, each inbred plant will have the sameallele (and
`plants that do not root lodge after anthesis through harvest;
`therefore be homozygous) at almostall of their loci. Percent
`plants that lean from the vertical axis at an approximately 30
`
`degree angle or greater would be counted as root lodged. identity is determined by comparingastatistically signifi-
`Data are collected only when sufficient selection pressure
`cant numberof the homozygousalleles of two varieties. For
`exists in the experiment measured.
`example, a percent identity of 90% between XO8F037 and
`LRTLPN=LATE ROOT LODGING:An estimate of the
`other variety means that the two varieties have the same
`homozygousalleles at 90% of their loci.
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`65
`
`percentage of plants that do not root lodge after anthesis
`
`

`

`US 9,699,995 B1
`
`9
`PLANT: As used herein, the term “plant” includesrefer-
`ence to an immature or mature wholeplant, including a plant
`that has been detasseled or from which seed or grain has
`been removed. Seed or embryo that will producethe plantis
`also considered to be the plant.
`the term “plant part”
`PLANT PART: As used herein,
`includes leaves, stems, roots, seed, grain, embryo, pollen,
`ovules, flowers, ears, cobs, husks, stalks, root tips, anthers,
`pericarp, silk, tissue, cells and the like. In some embodi-
`ments,
`the plant part contains al least one cell of hybrid
`maize variety XO8F037.
`PLATFORMindicates the variety with the base genetics
`and the variety with the base genetics comprising locus
`conversion(s). There can be a platform for the inbred maize
`variety and the hybrid maize variety.
`PLTHT=PLANT HEIGHT: This is a measure of the height
`of the plant from the ground tothetip of the tassel in inches.
`POLPRD=POLLEN PRODUCTION SCORE: Theesti-
`
`mated total amount of pollen produced by tassels based on
`the numberof tassel branches and the density of the spike-
`lets.
`
`POLSC=POLLEN SCORE: A 0 to 9 visual rating indi-
`cating the amountof pollen shed. The higher the score the
`more pollen shed.
`POLWT=POLLEN WEIGHT: This is calculated by dry
`weight of tassels collected as shedding commences minus
`dry weight from similar tassels harvested after shedding is
`complete.
`POP K/A=PLANT POPULATIONS: Measured as 1000’s
`per acre.
`POP ADV=PLANT POPULATION ADVANTAGE: The
`
`plant population advantage of variety #1 over variety #2 as
`calculated by PLANT POPULATIONofvariety #2-PLANT
`POPULATION of variety #1=PLANT POPULATION
`ADVANTAGEofvariety #1.
`PRM=PREDICTED RELATIVE MATURITY:Thistrait,
`predicted relative maturity, is based on the harvest moisture
`of the grain. The relative maturity rating is based on a known
`set of checks andutilizes standard linear regression analyses
`and is also referred to as the Comparative Relative Maturity
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket